Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

A two-layer lithium niobate resonator reaches 19.23 MHz with Q of 3187 and 29% coupling.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A periodically poled bi-layer lithium niobate resonator excites a second-order thickness mode at 19.23 MHz with Q=3187 and k2=29%, claiming the highest f*Q among piezoelectric power resonators.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Real device progress with inflated headline numbers: the P3F A2-mode demonstration is worth refereeing, but Q=3187 and k2=29% don't hold up against the paper's own data. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.09407 v1 pith:URUP6YRX submitted 2025-08-13 physics.app-ph

Periodically Poled Piezoelectric Lithium Niobate Resonator for Piezoelectric Power Conversion

Ziqian Yao , Clarissa Daniel , Lezli Matto , Heather Chang , Vakhtang Chuluhadze , Michael Liao , Jack Kramer , Eric Stolt
show 3 more authors
Mark S. Goorsky Juan Rivas-Davila Ruochen Lu
This is my paper
classification physics.app-ph
keywords periodically poled piezoelectric filmlithium niobatethickness-extensional resonatorpiezoelectric power conversionelectromechanical couplingquality factorwafer bondinghigh-power testing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Periodically poled piezoelectric film (P3F) structures—two lithium niobate layers bonded with opposite crystal polarity—can excite the second-order antisymmetric thickness-extensional (A2) mode that a single-layer resonator suppresses. The paper reports the first P3F lithium niobate resonator built for power conversion, operating at 19.23 MHz with a claimed electromechanical coupling of 29% and a quality factor of 3187. If these values hold, the device achieves the highest frequency-times-quality product among reported piezoelectric power resonators, opening a path to smaller, higher-frequency power converters that replace magnetic inductors with vibrating crystals. The paper also documents thermal behavior to 150°C and a high-power failure study up to 58 dBm.

Core claim

The central claim is that reversing the piezoelectric polarity between two bonded 36° Y-cut lithium niobate layers lets a thickness-extensional resonator couple strongly to its second-order antisymmetric (A2) overtone, instead of the fundamental symmetric (S1) mode. In a single layer, opposing stress phases cancel the charge buildup for even-order modes, so overtones are suppressed; in the P3F stack, the inverted piezoelectric coefficients flip the sign of e33 across the interface, making charge buildup constructive for A2 and destructive for S1. This lets the device operate at 19.23 MHz using a 0.34 mm-thick stack—thicker than a single-layer resonator at the same frequency—preserving acoust

What carries the argument

The periodically poled piezoelectric film (P3F) stack: two lithium niobate layers bonded face-to-face with opposite crystal orientation, so piezoelectric coefficients odd under inversion (e33, e31, e32) flip sign across the interface. This alternating polarity is the mechanism that selectively couples even-order antisymmetric thickness modes (A2, A6) while cancelling odd-order symmetric modes (S1), enabling higher resonance frequencies with a thicker film stack.

Load-bearing premise

The record-breaking frequency-quality product depends on accepting the smoothed BodeQ of 3187 as the quality factor and the 29% coupling extracted from the series and parallel resonances; using the standard IEEE-176 effective coupling formula on the same resonances gives about 19%, and the 3-dB bandwidth Q is 1282.

What would settle it

Measure the device impedance at low input power and recompute k2 from the series and parallel resonance frequencies with the IEEE-176 effective coupling formula; if k2 comes out near 19% rather than 29%, or if the quality factor from the 3-dB bandwidth is 1282 instead of the smoothed BodeQ peak of 3187, the state-of-the-art fs·Q claim does not hold.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The P3F design breaks the usual trade-off between frequency scaling and coupling efficiency: higher-order thickness modes can be excited at higher fs without thinning the film or shrinking the active region.
  • The same polarity-alternation principle extends to multilayer stacks, offering additional frequency scaling and bandwidth control.
  • Because the resonator operates at 19.23 MHz with high k2 and Q, it is suited for piezoelectric DC-DC converters targeting high-frequency, high power-density operation.
  • The demonstrated A6 mode at 63.9 MHz shows that the P3F structure can excite still higher overtones, potentially pushing power conversion into the tens-of-megahertz range.
  • Wafer bonding and electroplating processes yield >97% bonded area and about 1 J/m2 bond strength, providing a manufacturable integration route for P3F devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the standard IEEE-176 effective coupling formula to the measured series and parallel resonances (19.23 MHz and 21.38 MHz) gives roughly 19% rather than 29%; if that value is used, the claimed state-of-the-art fs·Q product drops below the cited single-layer LN-TE figure. This is an extraction choice the paper makes, not a paper claim.
  • The same polarity-alternation mechanism could be tested in other piezoelectric materials such as lithium tantalate or aluminum nitride; if it generalizes, the frequency-scaling benefit would extend beyond lithium niobate.
  • The grounded-ring layout suppresses spurious modes less effectively in the P3F configuration than in single-layer resonators; optimizing the ring geometry or adopting a different lateral-mode trap is a testable path to cleaner spectra.
  • Power handling was measured at a single frequency; mapping the failure threshold across the full resonance band would show whether the 58 dBm limit reflects a material limit or a particular operating point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a bi-layer 36°Y-cut lithium niobate resonator using the periodically poled piezoelectric film (P3F) concept, in which two oppositely oriented LN layers are bonded to excite the second-order antisymmetric thickness-extensional (A2) mode. The authors present FEA mode-shape evidence, a wafer-bonding and fabrication process, electrical characterization (fs = 19.23 MHz, fp = 21.38 MHz), a claimed k2 of 29% and Q of 3187, temperature-dependent measurements, and destructive high-power testing up to 58 dBm. The central claims are that this is the first P3F TE LN resonator for power conversion and that it achieves a record fs·Q product among piezoelectric power resonators.

Significance. If the headline numbers are correct, the work is significant for power electronics: it demonstrates a structural route to higher operating frequency without thinning the piezoelectric layer, and it provides the first systematic high-power and temperature data on P3F LN. The measured absence of the S1 mode and the FEA mode-shape comparison give credible support to the proposed A2 excitation mechanism, and the wafer-bonding and power-handling results are useful to the community. However, the quantitative performance claims rest on nonstandard or unspecified Q and k2 extraction procedures, so the paper's main quantitative contribution is not yet established as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Figs. 8–9, and Table I] The headline Q = 3187 is the peak of a Gaussian-smoothed BodeQ trace, while the paper itself reports a 3-dB Q of 1282 for the same device, attributed to electrode loading. The state-of-the-art fs·Q value in Table I uses 3187. For a power-conversion resonator, the loaded 3-dB Q is the relevant figure. With 1282, fs·Q = 19.23 MHz × 1282 = 2.46×10^10, which is below the single-layer LN-TE value already tabulated (10.14 MHz × 4000 = 4.06×10^10). The smoothed BodeQ also has an unspecified Gaussian filter width and is not a conservative estimate. The conclusion even states Q = 3148, inconsistent with 3187. Please report both Q values, specify the extraction procedure, and recompute all SOTA comparisons using the loaded Q.
  2. [Section V, Fig. 8, and Section II.B] The coupling coefficient k2 = 29% is stated to be 'extracted' from fs = 19.23 MHz and fp = 21.38 MHz, but no formula is given. Standard effective-coupling formulas from these two frequencies give lower values: (fp^2 − fs^2)/fp^2 ≈ 19%, and the IEEE-176 thickness-mode relation gives about 23%. The 29% value therefore appears to require a different or fitted definition. Since k2 enters the FoM and Table I, and since the FEA section also reports k2 = 24% without giving its formula, the experimental/simulation comparison is not verifiable. Specify the extraction formula and use one consistent definition for all k2 numbers.
  3. [Section VI, Figs. 14–15, and Conclusion] The device shows a permanent change in the frequency response at 42 dBm, attributed by the authors to bonding damage, and the 58 dBm value is complete physical failure with visible cracks and burned electrodes. The conclusion states 'power handling up to a failure threshold of 58 dBm,' but the useful operating range is limited by the irreversible degradation at 42 dBm. Please report both thresholds explicitly and clarify that 58 dBm is catastrophic failure, not the maximum power level at which the resonator remains functional.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section V, temperature measurements] The text refers to 'Fig. 9(a)' and 'Fig. 9(b)' when discussing the temperature-dependent impedance and extracted fs; these should be Fig. 11(a) and Fig. 11(b).
  2. [References] Several references contain encoding artifacts, e.g., 'Jkslashorgensen', 'Bę', and '5.1kslash%' and '19.4kslash%'. These should be cleaned before submission.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 8] The measured impedance trace shows multiple in-band spurious peaks, yet the abstract and introduction list 'spurious-free response' as a target. The paper is honest about the residual spurious modes in the text, but the framing could be adjusted to avoid implying that the demonstrated device is spurious-free.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the paper is an experimental demonstration with independent FEA and measurements.

full rationale

The manuscript contains no formal derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs. The central claims are experimental: a fabricated P3F TE-mode LN resonator is measured, and its fs, k2, and Q are extracted from the measured impedance/admittance. The FEA simulations (Section II) use literature material constants and are not fitted to the measured results; the simulated fs (19.39 MHz) and k2 (24%) are close to but not identical to the measured values, indicating an independent prediction. The P3F concept is cited from prior work by the same authors, but the present contribution is the device demonstration and power-handling study, so the citations provide context rather than bearing the weight of the claim. The only near-concern is the metric choice for Q: the abstract and Table I use the smoothed peak BodeQ (3187) while the paper itself reports a 3dB Q of 1282, and the k2 extraction from fs/fp is not specified with a formula. These are measurement-interpretation or reporting choices that affect the strength of the state-of-the-art comparison, but they are not circular: the Q and k2 values are not fitted to make the fs·Q claim true, and the paper explicitly discloses the alternative 3dB Q. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely relabeled. Under the rules, disagreement with the chosen metric or inconsistency between abstract and conclusion is a correctness/consistency issue, not circularity. Therefore the circularity score is low (1), reflecting only a minor self-citation presence that is not load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on literature material constants, an ideal-bond assumption in FEA, and two measurement definitions (smoothed BodeQ and an unspecified k2 extraction). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Gaussian moving average filter width for BodeQ = not stated
    The reported peak Q of 3187 comes from a smoothed BodeQ curve; the filter width is chosen by the authors and not quantified, and it directly sets the headline performance metric.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption 36 degree Y-cut LN piezoelectric constants in Eq. (1) are valid for both bonded layers
    FEA and mode analysis rely on these literature constants; the bonded stack is assumed to behave as two ideal oppositely poled crystals.
  • domain assumption The bonded interface is acoustically transparent in the FEA and does not add loss
    Simulation treats the P3F stack as continuous; interface roughness, voids, and bond compliance are not modeled, yet Q=3187 depends on low loss.
  • ad hoc to paper The coupling coefficient is extracted by an unstated formula that yields 29% from the stated resonances
    The standard effective coupling formula gives about 19% for fs=19.23 MHz and fp=21.38 MHz; the paper's 29% requires a different, unspecified definition.
  • ad hoc to paper Smoothed peak BodeQ represents the resonator quality factor for SOTA comparison
    The 3dB Q of the same device is 1282; using 3187 instead is a measurement-interpretation choice that sustains the fs*Q record claim.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Periodically Poled Piezoelectric Lithium Niobate Resonator for Piezoelectric Power Conversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URUP6YRX

@misc{pith2026250809407,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Periodically Poled Piezoelectric Lithium Niobate Resonator for Piezoelectric Power Conversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URUP6YRX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09407}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

As the demand for compact and efficient power conversion systems increases, piezoelectric power converters have gained attention for their ability to replace bulky magnetic inductors with acoustic resonators, enabling higher power density and improved efficiency. Achieving optimal converter performance requires resonators with high quality factor ($Q$), strong electromechanical coupling ($k^2$), high power handling capability, and a spurious-free response. Lithium niobate (LN) has emerged as a promising material in this context due to its high figure of merit (FoM = $Q \cdot k^2$). While previous studies on single-layer LN resonators have demonstrated high FoM values, they typically operate at relatively low resonance frequencies ($f_s$). Recently, periodically poled piezoelectric film (P3F) structures, formed by stacking piezoelectric layers with alternating crystal orientations, have shown the potential to both scale up the operating frequency and enhance the FoM compared to single-layer counterparts in piezoelectric power conversion. This work presents the first P3F thickness-extensional (TE) LN resonator for power conversion, operating at 19.23 MHz, with a large \textit{$k^2$} of 29\% and a high \textit{Q} of 3187, achieving a state-of-the-art (\textit{ $f_s \cdot Q$}) product among piezoelectric power resonators. A high-power testing procedure is performed to systematically study the nonlinear behavior and power handling of P3F LN for power applications. With further optimization, P3F TE resonators have the potential to open up a new design space for high-power and high-frequency power conversion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09407 by Clarissa Daniel, Eric Stolt, Heather Chang, Jack Kramer, Juan Rivas-Davila, Lezli Matto, Mark S. Goorsky, Michael Liao, Ruochen Lu, Vakhtang Chuluhadze, Ziqian Yao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematics of (a) side-view with material axes of P3F [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FEA simulated results of the proposed P3F resonator: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated wideband impedance response from 1–100 MHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Optical image of the bonded 36°Y-cut|36°Y-cut LiNbO3 pair with 97% effective bonded area. Inset: bonding design schematic. Schematics of wafer orientation for the (b) top and the (c) bottom wafer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bond strength measurement showing a crack length of 4.7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Measured frequency domain impedance and resistance of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fabrication and integration process for P3F TE LN resonator. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Measured wideband impedance response from 1–100 MHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Measured frequency domain impedance and resistance at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: High power resonator impedance testing setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a) New resonator and matching network frequency response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Normalized |Z| vs power of new resonator from 10dBm to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spurious-Free Lithium Niobate Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator with Grounded-Ring Electrode

    eess.SY 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    A grounded-ring electrode in lithium niobate creates a spurious-free thickness-extensional BAW resonator operating at 10.14 MHz with 29.6% electromechanical coupling and maximum Q of 5230.

  2. Bimorph Lithium Niobate Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer

    physics.app-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    A bimorph lithium niobate PMUT with opposite in-plane polarizations was fabricated and driven to a flexural mode near 1 MHz; the 3.6% coupling figure is from FEA, not from the measured data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Onsize and magnetics: Why small efficient power inductors are rare,

    C.R.Sullivan,B.A.Reese,A.L.Stein,andP.A.Kyaw“Onsize and magnetics: Why small efficient power inductors are rare,” in 2016 International Symposium on 3D Power Electronics IntegrationandManufacturing(3D-PEIM)IEEEpp.1–232016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    A comparative study on parasitic capacitance in inductors with series or parallel windings,

    H. Zhao, Z. Yan, S. Luan, D. N. Dalal, J. K. Jkslashorgensen, R. Wang, X. Zhou, and Bę “A comparative study on parasitic capacitance in inductors with series or parallel windings,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 15140– 15151 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Measurements and performance factor comparisons of magnetic materials at high frequency,

    A. J. Hanson, J. A. Belk, S. Lim, C. R. Sullivan, and D. J. Perreault “Measurements and performance factor comparisons of magnetic materials at high frequency,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 7909–7925 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    A snapshot in time: The future in filters for cell phones,

    R. Ruby “A snapshot in time: The future in filters for cell phones,” IEEE Microwave Magazine vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 46–59 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Mi- crowave acoustic devices: Recent advances and outlook,

    S. Gong, R. Lu, Y. Yang, L. Gao, and A. E. Hassanien “Mi- crowave acoustic devices: Recent advances and outlook,” IEEE Journal of Microwaves vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 601–609 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Acoustically driven electromagnetic radiating elements,

    A. E. Hassanien, M. Breen, M. Li, and S. Gong “Acoustically driven electromagnetic radiating elements,” Scientific reports vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17006 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Feedback control for a piezoelectric-resonator-based dc-dc power con- verter,

    J. J. Piel, J. D. Boles, J. H. Lang, and D. J. Perreault “Feedback control for a piezoelectric-resonator-based dc-dc power con- verter,” in 2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL) IEEE pp. 1–8 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Optimized res- onators for piezoelectric power conversion,

    W. D. Braun, E. A. Stolt, L. Gu, J. Segovia-Fernandez, S. Chakraborty, R. Lu, and J. M. Rivas-Davila “Optimized res- onators for piezoelectric power conversion,” IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics vol. 2, pp. 212–224 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Piezoelectric-based power conversion: Recent progress, opportunities, and challenges,

    J. D. Boles, J. J. Piel, N. Elaine, J. E. Bonavia, J. H. Lang, and D. J. Perreault “Piezoelectric-based power conversion: Recent progress, opportunities, and challenges,” in 2022 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC) IEEE pp. 1–8 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Resonant current estimation and phase-locked loop control system for inductorless step-up single piezo element-based (SUPRC) DC- DC converter,

    J. Forrester, M. P. Foster, and J. N. Davidson “Resonant current estimation and phase-locked loop control system for inductorless step-up single piezo element-based (SUPRC) DC- DC converter,” in IECON 2022–48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society IEEE pp. 1–6 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    AStackedRadial Mode Lithium Niobate Transformer for DC-DC Conversion,

    E.A.Stolt,C.Daniel,andJ.M.Rivas-Davila“AStackedRadial Mode Lithium Niobate Transformer for DC-DC Conversion,” in 2024 IEEE Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL) IEEE pp. 1–7 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    A stacked piezoelectric converter using a segmented idt lithium niobate resonator,

    W. D. Braun, E. A. Stolt, K. Nguyen, J. Segovia-Fernandez, S. Chakraborty, R. Lu, and J. M. Rivas-Davila “A stacked piezoelectric converter using a segmented idt lithium niobate resonator,” IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics vol. 5, pp. 286–294 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    A spurious-free piezoelectric resonator based 3.2 kW DC–DC converter for EV on-board chargers,

    E. Stolt, W. Braun, K. Nguyen, V. Chulukhadze, R. Lu, and J. Rivas-Davila “A spurious-free piezoelectric resonator based 3.2 kW DC–DC converter for EV on-board chargers,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2478–2488 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Lithium Tantalate Bulk Acoustic Resonator For Piezoelec- tric Power Conversion,

    Z.Yao,C.Daniel,E.Stolt,V.Chulukhadze,J.R.Davila,andR. Lu “Lithium Tantalate Bulk Acoustic Resonator For Piezoelec- tric Power Conversion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03198 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    High-Efficiency Isolated Piezoelectric Transformers for Magnetic-less DC-DC Power Conversion,

    S. Naval, W. Xu, M. Touhami, and J. D. Boles “High-Efficiency Isolated Piezoelectric Transformers for Magnetic-less DC-DC Power Conversion,” in 2025 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) IEEE pp. 1012–1019 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    A Piezoelectric- Resonator-Based “Active Inductor

    T. J. Skinner, M. Touhami, and J. D. Boles “A Piezoelectric- Resonator-Based “Active Inductor”,” in 2024 IEEE Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL) IEEE pp. 1–8 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    A piezoelectric-resonator-based dc–dc converter demonstrating 1 kw/cm resonator power density,

    J. D. Boles, J. E. Bonavia, J. H. Lang, and D. J. Perreault “A piezoelectric-resonator-based dc–dc converter demonstrating 1 kw/cm resonator power density,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2811–2815 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Fundamental examination of multiple potential passive component technolo- gies for future power electronics,

    P. A. Kyaw, A. L. Stein, and C. R. Sullivan “Fundamental examination of multiple potential passive component technolo- gies for future power electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 10708–10722 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Analysis of high- efficiency operating modes for piezoelectric resonator-based dc- dc converters,

    J. D. Boles, J. J. Piel, and D. J. Perreault “Analysis of high- efficiency operating modes for piezoelectric resonator-based dc- dc converters,” in 2020 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con- ference and Exposition (APEC) IEEE pp. 946–953 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Vertically stacked piezoelectric transformer for high-frequency power amplifier,

    Y. Hou, M. Garud, Q. Ji, A. Persaud, P. Seidl, T. Schenkel, A. Lal, and K. Afridi “Vertically stacked piezoelectric transformer for high-frequency power amplifier,” in 2023 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) IEEE pp. 392–396 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Evaluating piezoelectric materials and vibration modes for power conversion,

    J. D. Boles, J. E. Bonavia, P. L. Acosta, Y. K. Ramadass, J. H. Lang, and D. J. Perreault “Evaluating piezoelectric materials and vibration modes for power conversion,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 3374–3390 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Fixed-frequency con- trolofpiezoelectricresonatordc-dcconvertersforspuriousmode avoidance,

    E. Stolt, W. D. Braun, L. Gu, J. Segovia-Fernandez, S. Chakraborty, R. Lu, and J. Rivas-Davila “Fixed-frequency con- trolofpiezoelectricresonatordc-dcconvertersforspuriousmode avoidance,” IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics vol. 2, pp. 582–590 2021. 9

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Spurious-free lithium niobate bulk acoustic resonator for piezo- electric power conversion,

    K. Nguyen, E. Stolt, W. Braun, V. Chulukhadze, J. Segovia- Fernandez, S. Chakraborty, J. Rivas-Davila, and R. Lu “Spurious-free lithium niobate bulk acoustic resonator for piezo- electric power conversion,” in 2023 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS) IEEE pp. 1–4 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Near spurious- free thickness shear mode lithium niobate resonator for piezo- electric power conversion,

    K. Nguyen, V. Chulukhadze, E. Stolt, W. Braun, J. Segovia- Fernandez, S. Chakraborty, J. Rivas, and R. Lu “Near spurious- free thickness shear mode lithium niobate resonator for piezo- electric power conversion,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1536– 1543 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Piezoelectric materials for the DC-DC converters based on piezoelectric resonators,

    M. Touhami, G. Despesse, T. Hilt, M. Bousquet, A. Reinhardt, E. Borel, V. Breton, K. Gneza, and F. Costa “Piezoelectric materials for the DC-DC converters based on piezoelectric resonators,” in 2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL) IEEE pp. 1–8 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Process and design challenge for SMR-type bulk acoustic wave (BAW) fil- ters at frequencies above 5 GHz,

    M. Schaefer, R. Rothemund, and G. Fattinger “Process and design challenge for SMR-type bulk acoustic wave (BAW) fil- ters at frequencies above 5 GHz,” in 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) IEEE pp. 1696–1699 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Nonlinear losses and material limits of piezoelectric resonators for dc-dc converters,

    C. Daniel, E. Stolt, W. Braun, R. Lu, and J. Rivas-Davila “Nonlinear losses and material limits of piezoelectric resonators for dc-dc converters,” in 2024 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) IEEE pp. 1560–1565 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Enabling higher or- der lamb wave acoustic devices with complementarily oriented piezoelectricthinfilms,

    R. Lu, Y. Yang, S. Link, and S. Gong “Enabling higher or- der lamb wave acoustic devices with complementarily oriented piezoelectricthinfilms,”JournalofMicroelectromechanicalSys- tems vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1332–1346 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Experimental Study of Periodically Poled Piezoelectric Film Lithium Niobate Resonator at Cryogenic Temperatures,

    J. Kramer, O. Barrera, S. Cho, V. Chulukhadze, T. Hsu, and R. Lu “Experimental Study of Periodically Poled Piezoelectric Film Lithium Niobate Resonator at Cryogenic Temperatures,” in 2024 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium- IMS 2024 IEEE pp. 154–157 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Fundamental antisymmetric mode acous- tic resonator in periodically poled piezoelectric film lithium niobate,

    O. Barrera, J. Kramer, R. Tetro, S. Cho, V. Chulukhadze, L. Colombo, and R. Lu “Fundamental antisymmetric mode acous- tic resonator in periodically poled piezoelectric film lithium niobate,” in 2023 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) IEEE pp. 1–4 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Recent Advances in High-Performance Millimeter-Wave Acoustic Resonators and Filters Using Thin-Film Lithium Nio- bate,

    R. Lu “Recent Advances in High-Performance Millimeter-Wave Acoustic Resonators and Filters Using Thin-Film Lithium Nio- bate,” Progress in Quantum Electronics pp. 100565 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    A manufacturable AlScN periodically polarized piezoelectric film bulk acoustic wave resonator (AlScN P3F BAW) operating in overtone mode at X and Ku band,

    R. Vetury, A. Kochhar, J. Leathersich, C. Moe, M. Winters, J. Shealy, and R. H. Olsson “A manufacturable AlScN periodically polarized piezoelectric film bulk acoustic wave resonator (AlScN P3F BAW) operating in overtone mode at X and Ku band,” in 2023 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium-IMS 2023 IEEE pp. 891–894 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Thin-film lithium niobate acoustic resonator with high Q of 237 and k 2 of 5.1kslash% at 50.74 GHz,

    J. Kramer, V. Chulukhadze, K. Huynh, O. Barrera, M. Liao, S. Cho, L. Matto, M. S. Goorsky, and R. Lu “Thin-film lithium niobate acoustic resonator with high Q of 237 and k 2 of 5.1kslash% at 50.74 GHz,” in 2023 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS) IEEE pp. 1–4 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    23.8-GHz acoustic filter in periodically poled piezoelectric film lithium niobate with 1.52- dB IL and 19.4kslash% FBW,

    S. Cho, O. Barrera, J. Kramer, V. Chulukhadze, T. Hsu, J. Campbell, I. Anderson, and R. Lu “23.8-GHz acoustic filter in periodically poled piezoelectric film lithium niobate with 1.52- dB IL and 19.4kslash% FBW,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    A 56 ghz trilayer aln/scaln/aln periodically poled fbar,

    W. Peng, S. Nam, D. Wang, Z. Mi, and A. Mortazawi “A 56 ghz trilayer aln/scaln/aln periodically poled fbar,” in 2024 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium-IMS 2024 IEEE pp. 150–153 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    The impact of area on BAW resonator performance and an approach to device miniaturization,

    N. Nguyen, A. Johannessen, S. Rooth, and U. Hanke “The impact of area on BAW resonator performance and an approach to device miniaturization,” Ultrasonics vol. 94, pp. 92–101 2019

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    57 GHz acoustic resonator with k 2 of 7.3kslash% and Q of 56 in thin-film lithium niobate,

    J. Kramer, S. Cho, M. E. Liao, K. Huynh, O. Barrera, L. Matto, M. S. Goorsky, and R. Lu “57 GHz acoustic resonator with k 2 of 7.3kslash% and Q of 56 in thin-film lithium niobate,” in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE pp. 16–4 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Thin-film lithium niobate based piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducers,

    R.Lu,M.Breen,A.Hassanien,Y.Yang,andS.Gong“Thin-film lithium niobate based piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducers,” in 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Sympo- sium (IUS) IEEE pp. 1–3 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Ultra-widebandMEMSfiltersusing localized thinned 128kslash° Y-cut thin-film lithium niobate,

    J. Wu, S. Zhang, P. Zheng, L. Zhang, H. Yao, X. Fang, X. Tian, X.Zhao,T.Wu,andX.Ou“Ultra-widebandMEMSfiltersusing localized thinned 128kslash° Y-cut thin-film lithium niobate,” in 2023 IEEE 36th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) IEEE pp. 177–180 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    7.5 GHz near-zero temperature coef- ficient of frequency lithium niobate resonator,

    K. Liu, Y. Lu, and T. Wu “7.5 GHz near-zero temperature coef- ficient of frequency lithium niobate resonator,” IEEE Electron Device Letters vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 305–308 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Review and Comparison of Bulk Acoustic Wave FBAR, SMR Technology,

    R. Ruby “Review and Comparison of Bulk Acoustic Wave FBAR, SMR Technology,” in 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Sympo- sium Proceedings IEEE pp. 1029–1040 2007

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Bond strength measurements for wafer bonding,

    W. P. Maszara, G. Goetz, A. Caviglia, and J. B. McKitterick “Bond strength measurements for wafer bonding,” Journal of Applied Physics vol. 64, pp. 4943–4950 1988

    work page 1988

  43. [43]

    Direct bonding of lithium niobate and silicon dioxide wafers,

    R. Takigawa, N. Oshima, T. Matsumae, and S. Tanaka “Direct bonding of lithium niobate and silicon dioxide wafers,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics vol. 57, pp. 06HJ12 2018

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Room- temperature direct bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers,

    H. Takagi, K. Kikuchi, R. Maeda, and T. R. Chung “Room- temperature direct bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering vol. 11, pp. 348–352 2001

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Augmented piezoelectric resonators for power conversion,

    J. E. Bonavia, J. D. Boles, J. H. Lang, and D. J. Perreault “Augmented piezoelectric resonators for power conversion,” in 2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL) IEEE pp. 1–8 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    After 60 years: A new formula for computing quality factor is war- ranted,

    D. A. Feld, R. Parker, R. Ruby, P. Bradley, and S. Dong “After 60 years: A new formula for computing quality factor is war- ranted,” in 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium IEEE pp. 431– 436 2008

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    Temperature dependence of the main piezoelectric parameters of a Nb-Li doped PZT ce- ramic,

    C. Miclea, C. Tanasoiu, L. Amarande, M. Cioangher, L. Trupina, C. Miclea, and C. David “Temperature dependence of the main piezoelectric parameters of a Nb-Li doped PZT ce- ramic,” in 2006 International Semiconductor Conference IEEE pp. 279–282 2006

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    Temperature dependence of the elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of lithium tantalate and lithium niobate,

    R. Smith and F. Welsh “Temperature dependence of the elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of lithium tantalate and lithium niobate,” Journal of applied physics vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2219–2230 1971

    work page 1971

  49. [49]

    A laterally vibrating lithium niobate MEMS resonator array operating at 500kslash° C in air,

    S. R. Eisner, C. A. Chapin, R. Lu, Y. Yang, S. Gong, and D. G. Senesky “A laterally vibrating lithium niobate MEMS resonator array operating at 500kslash° C in air,” Sensors vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 149 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Thermal Resilience of Suspended Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Acoustic Resonators up to 550 {\deg}C

    M. Chaudhari, N. Ahmed, V. Tallavajhula, J. Campbell, Y. Wang, Z. Du, and R. Lu “Thermal Resilience of Suspended Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Acoustic Resonators up to 550 ° C,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20840 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.