pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.09688 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Stabilizing boundary time crystals through Non-markovian dynamics

Bandita Das , Rahul Ghosh , Victor Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords boundary time crystalsnon-Markovian dynamicsopen quantum systemsdissipative dynamicshigher-order limit cyclesquantum Fisher informationtime translational symmetry breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Markovian dynamics stabilizes boundary time crystals across broad ranges of dissipation in open quantum systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines boundary time crystals in open quantum systems when the environment has memory, known as non-Markovian dynamics. It shows that these memory effects allow the characteristic periodic oscillations to persist even when dissipation occurs at moderate strengths, in contrast to memoryless cases where the order typically breaks down. The authors track this stabilization and the appearance of higher-order limit cycles through quantum Fisher information, average magnetization, a non-Markovianity measure, and a dynamical phase diagram. This points toward realizing time-translation symmetry breaking in more realistic dissipative quantum settings.

Core claim

Non-Markovian dynamics can be highly beneficial for stabilizing BTCs over a wide range of parameter values, even in the presence of intermediate rates of dissipation. Notably, higher-order limit cycles emerge for some parameter regimes. The effect is analyzed using quantum Fisher information, time-averaged magnetization, a measure of non-Markovianity, and a dynamical phase diagram, all of which show complex behaviors with changing non-Markovianity parameters.

What carries the argument

Non-Markovian dynamics applied to boundary time crystals, analyzed through quantum Fisher information, magnetization, and a dynamical phase diagram to reveal stability and higher-order limit cycles.

If this is right

  • Boundary time crystals remain stable under intermediate dissipation when memory effects are present.
  • Higher-order limit cycles appear as additional phases for certain non-Markovian strengths.
  • Time-translational symmetry breaking can be maintained in open quantum systems with realistic environments.
  • Further studies of varied dissipative dynamics become feasible for symmetry-breaking phenomena.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Quantum devices subject to natural environmental memory may host more robust time crystals than previously expected.
  • Similar memory-assisted stabilization could extend to other dissipative symmetry-breaking systems in quantum optics.
  • Optimal memory timescales for stability could be identified by scanning non-Markovian parameters in controlled experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The specific non-Markovian model and numerical integration scheme capture realistic open-system dynamics without introducing artifacts that artificially enhance the observed stability.

What would settle it

A physical experiment in which increasing the non-Markovian memory parameter causes the persistent oscillations in magnetization or the peak in quantum Fisher information to decay would falsify the stabilization result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09688 by Bandita Das, Rahul Ghosh, Victor Mukherjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plot showing the dynamics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: c), supported by multiple dominant Fourier peaks (Fig. 2f)) and a limit cycle on the Bloch sphere (Fig. 2i)). a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) FIG. 2. Plot showing the dynamics of mz in the non￾Markovian regime for m = κ0/4, (a, b, c), the corresponding FFT (d, e, f) and the representation of the dynamics on the Bloch sphere (g, h, i), for different values of ω0/κ0, in the non￾Markovian regime. mz shows (a) irre… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) We plot the QFI in the non-Markovian regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. FFT peak ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Complete phase diagram as we go from Markovian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Figure showing (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study Boundary time crystals (BTCs) in the presence of non-Markovian dynamics. In contrast to BTCs observed in earlier works in the Markovian regime, we show that non-Markovian dynamics can be highly beneficial for stabilizing BTCs over a wide range of parameter values, even in the presence of intermediate rates of dissipation. Notably, we also observe the emergence of higher-order limit cycles (HO-LCs) for some parameter regimes. We analyze the effect of non-Markovian dynamics on BTCs and HO-LCs using quantum Fisher information, time-averaged magnetization, a measure of non-Markovianity, and a dynamical phase diagram, all of which show complex behaviors with changing non-Markovianity parameters. Our studies can pave the way for stabilizing time crystals in dissipative systems, as well as lead to studies on varied dissipative dynamics on time translational symmetry breaking.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines boundary time crystals (BTCs) in open quantum systems subject to non-Markovian dynamics. It reports that non-Markovian effects stabilize BTCs across a wider parameter range than in the Markovian limit, even at intermediate dissipation strengths, and additionally observes higher-order limit cycles (HO-LCs) in certain regimes. These findings are supported by numerical phase diagrams constructed from quantum Fisher information, time-averaged magnetization, and a non-Markovianity measure.

Significance. If the numerical evidence is robust, the work is significant because it identifies non-Markovian memory as a practical resource for protecting time-crystalline order against dissipation, a result that could guide experimental searches in platforms with controllable environments. The appearance of HO-LCs further enriches the dissipative phase diagram and may stimulate studies of higher-order time-translation symmetry breaking.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods and phase diagrams] The numerical methods and results sections provide no information on Hilbert-space dimension, system size, integrator step size, or convergence tests with respect to these parameters. Because the central claim—that non-Markovian dynamics enlarges the BTC region even at intermediate dissipation—rests entirely on these simulations, the absence of such checks leaves open the possibility that the reported stabilization is influenced by finite-size effects or discretization artifacts.
  2. [Model and non-Markovianity measure] The non-Markovianity measure and the memory kernel (or collision-model implementation) are introduced without an explicit statement of the discretization scheme or comparison to an exactly solvable limit. Without such validation, it is difficult to rule out that the observed widening of the BTC phase arises from numerical backflow rather than genuine physical non-Markovianity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure captions for the dynamical phase diagrams should explicitly state the system size and integration parameters used to generate each panel.
  2. [Introduction] A brief comparison paragraph with the Markovian limit (e.g., recovery of known BTC boundaries when the memory time is taken to zero) would strengthen the narrative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and robustness of the numerical evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods and phase diagrams] The numerical methods and results sections provide no information on Hilbert-space dimension, system size, integrator step size, or convergence tests with respect to these parameters. Because the central claim—that non-Markovian dynamics enlarges the BTC region even at intermediate dissipation—rests entirely on these simulations, the absence of such checks leaves open the possibility that the reported stabilization is influenced by finite-size effects or discretization artifacts.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit 'Numerical Implementation' subsection that reports the Hilbert-space dimension (2^N for N spins), the system sizes used (N = 3, 4, 6 with main results for N = 4), the fixed-step Runge-Kutta integrator (dt = 0.001), and convergence tests performed by halving the time step and increasing N where computationally feasible. These tests show that the location and extent of the BTC region remain qualitatively unchanged, indicating that the reported stabilization is not an artifact of finite-size effects or discretization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model and non-Markovianity measure] The non-Markovianity measure and the memory kernel (or collision-model implementation) are introduced without an explicit statement of the discretization scheme or comparison to an exactly solvable limit. Without such validation, it is difficult to rule out that the observed widening of the BTC phase arises from numerical backflow rather than genuine physical non-Markovianity.

    Authors: We agree that further validation strengthens the presentation. The revised manuscript now contains a detailed description of the collision-model discretization, including the memory-kernel time step chosen to ensure stability and convergence. We have also added a direct comparison to the exactly solvable Markovian limit: when the memory time is taken to zero the non-Markovianity measure vanishes and the BTC phase boundaries recover the Markovian results of prior literature. This limit test supports that the observed widening arises from physical non-Markovian effects rather than numerical backflow. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; non-Markovian stabilization of BTCs rests on independent numerical diagnostics

full rationale

The paper derives its central claim from numerical integration of a time-nonlocal master equation or collision model for non-Markovian open-system dynamics. Diagnostics including quantum Fisher information, time-averaged magnetization, a separately defined non-Markovianity measure, and the dynamical phase diagram are applied to the resulting trajectories. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling reduce the stabilization result to its own inputs. Earlier Markovian BTC references are contrasted without forcing the non-Markovian benefit. The analysis is therefore self-contained relative to the chosen model and observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a specific non-Markovian master equation whose memory kernel is chosen to interpolate between Markovian and strongly non-Markovian limits; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • non-Markovianity strength parameter
    Controls the memory time or kernel width and is scanned to produce the phase diagram.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The open-system dynamics can be described by a time-local or time-nonlocal master equation with a phenomenological memory kernel.
    Standard in open quantum systems but assumes the bath correlation function takes a particular functional form.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1324 out tokens · 43875 ms · 2026-05-18T23:26:10.687000+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamics of a quantum phase tran- sition and relaxation to a steady state

    Jacek Dziarmaga. Dynamics of a quantum phase tran- sition and relaxation to a steady state. Advances in Physics, 59(6):1063–1189, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Chakrabarti, Uma Divakaran, Thomas F

    Amit Dutta, Gabriel Aeppli, Bikas K. Chakrabarti, Uma Divakaran, Thomas F. Rosenbaum, and Diptiman Sen. Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Spin Models: From Statistical Physics to Quantum Informa- tion. Cambridge University Press, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Coherent quantum annealing in a programmable 2,000 qubit ising chain

    Andrew D King, Sei Suzuki, Jack Raymond, Alex Zucca, Trevor Lanting, Fabio Altomare, Andrew J Berkley, Sara Ejtemaee, Emile Hoskinson, Shuiyuan Huang, Eric Ladizinsky, Allison J R MacDonald, Gaelen Marsden, Travis Oh, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Mauricio Reis, Chris Rich, Yuki Sato, Jed D Whittaker, Jason Yao, Richard Harris, Daniel A Lidar, Hidetoshi Nishimo...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry

    Krzysztof Sacha. Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry. Phys. Rev. A , 91:033617, Mar 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Zaletel, Mikhail Lukin, Christopher Monroe, Chetan Nayak, Frank Wilczek, and Norman Y

    Michael P. Zaletel, Mikhail Lukin, Christopher Monroe, Chetan Nayak, Frank Wilczek, and Norman Y. Yao. Col- loquium: Quantum and classical discrete time crystals. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 95:031001, Jul 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Vedika Khemani, C. W. von Keyserlingk, and S. L. Sondhi. Defining time crystals via representation theory. Phys. Rev. B , 96:115127, Sep 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system

    Soonwon Choi, Joonhee Choi, Renate Landig, Georg Kucsko, Hengyun Zhou, Junichi Isoya, Fedor Jelezko, Shinobu Onoda, Hitoshi Sumiya, Vedika Khemani, et al. Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system. Nature, 543(7644):221–225, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Soham Pal, Naveen Nishad, T. S. Mahesh, and G. J. Sreejith. Temporal order in periodically driven spins in star-shaped clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120:180602, May 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Boundary time crystals

    Fernando Iemini, Angelo Russomanno, Jonathan Keel- ing, Marco Schir` o, Marcello Dalmonte, and Rosario Fazio. Boundary time crystals. Physical review letters , 121(3):035301, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Boundary time crystals in collec- tive d-level systems

    Luis Fernando dos Prazeres, Leonardo da Silva Souza, and Fernando Iemini. Boundary time crystals in collec- tive d-level systems. Phys. Rev. B, 103:184308, May 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Observation of a continuous time crystal

    Phatthamon Kongkhambut, Jim Skulte, Ludwig Mathey, Jayson Cosme G., Andreas Hemmerich, and Hans Kessler. Observation of a continuous time crystal. Sci- ence, 377(6606):670, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Nonequilibrium many-body quantum engine driven by time-translation symmetry breaking

    Federico Carollo, Kay Brandner, and Igor Lesanovsky. Nonequilibrium many-body quantum engine driven by time-translation symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125:240602, Dec 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Autti, P

    S. Autti, P. J. Heikkinen, J. T. M¨ akinen, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov. Ac josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals. Nature Materials , 20(2):171–174, Feb 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Quantum thermodynamics of boundary time-crystals

    Federico Carollo, Igor Lesanovsky, Mauro Antezza, and Gabriele De Chiara. Quantum thermodynamics of boundary time-crystals. Quantum Science and Technol- ogy, 9(3):035024, may 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Time crystallinity in open quantum sys- tems

    Andreu Riera-Campeny, Maria Moreno-Cardoner, and Anna Sanpera. Time crystallinity in open quantum sys- tems. Quantum, 4:270, May 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Discrete time-crystalline order in cavity and circuit qed systems

    Zongping Gong, Ryusuke Hamazaki, and Masahito Ueda. Discrete time-crystalline order in cavity and circuit qed systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120:040404, Jan 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Observation of a dissipative time crystal

    Hans Keßler, Phatthamon Kongkhambut, Christoph Georges, Ludwig Mathey, Jayson G Cosme, and Andreas Hemmerich. Observation of a dissipative time crystal. Physical Review Letters , 127(4):043602, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Symmetries and conserved quanti- ties of boundary time crystals in generalized spin models

    Giulia Piccitto, Matteo Wauters, Franco Nori, and Nathan Shammah. Symmetries and conserved quanti- ties of boundary time crystals in generalized spin models. Phys. Rev. B , 104:014307, Jul 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Generating discrete time crystals through optimal con- trol, 2025

    Mrutyunjaya Sahoo, Rahul Ghosh, Bandita Das, Shishira Mahunta, Bodhaditya Santra, and Victor Mukherjee. Generating discrete time crystals through optimal con- trol, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems

    Bihui Zhu, Jamir Marino, Norman Y Yao, Mikhail D Lukin, and Eugene A Demler. Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems. New Journal of Physics , 21(7):073028, jul 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Dis- crete time crystals in the presence of non-markovian dy- namics

    Bandita Das, Noufal Jaseem, and Victor Mukherjee. Dis- crete time crystals in the presence of non-markovian dy- namics. Phys. Rev. A , 110:012208, Jul 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Exotic syn- chronization in continuous time crystals outside the sym- metric subspace

    Parvinder Solanki, Midhun Krishna, Michal Hajduˇ sek, Christoph Bruder, and Sai Vinjanampathy. Exotic syn- chronization in continuous time crystals outside the sym- metric subspace. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 133:260403, Dec 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Chaos in time: A dissipative continuous quasi time crystals, 2024

    Parvinder Solanki and Fabrizio Minganti. Chaos in time: A dissipative continuous quasi time crystals, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    The The- ory of Open Quantum Systems

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione. The The- ory of Open Quantum Systems . Oxford University Press, 01 2007

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    D. F. Walls, P. D. Drummond, S. S. Hassan, and H. J. Carmichael. Non-equilibrium phase transitions in coop- erative atomic systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 64:307–320, 02 1978

    work page 1978

  26. [26]

    Colloquium: Non-markovian dy- namics in open quantum systems

    Heinz-Peter Breuer, Elsi-Mari Laine, Jyrki Piilo, and Bassano Vacchini. Colloquium: Non-markovian dy- namics in open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 88:021002, Apr 2016

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    General non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems

    Wei-Min Zhang, Ping-Yuan Lo, Heng-Na Xiong, Matisse Wei-Yuan Tu, and Franco Nori. General non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 109:170402, Oct 2012

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Efficiency of quantum controlled non-markovian thermalization

    Victor Mukherjee, Vittorio Giovannetti, Rosario Fazio, Susana F Huelga, Tommaso Calarco, and Simone Mon- tangero. Efficiency of quantum controlled non-markovian thermalization. New Journal of Physics , 17(6):063031, 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Degree of non-markovianity of quantum evolution

    Dariusz Chru´ sci´ nski and Sabrina Maniscalco. Degree of non-markovianity of quantum evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:120404, Mar 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems

    Heinz-Peter Breuer, Elsi-Mari Laine, and Jyrki Piilo. Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:210401, Nov 2009

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one- atom maser

    Gerhard Rempe, Herbert Walther, and Norbert Klein. Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one- atom maser. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 58:353–356, Jan 1987. 8

    work page 1987

  32. [32]

    Constructive method for detecting the information back- flow of non-markovian dynamics

    Bogna Bylicka, Markus Johansson, and Antonio Ac´ ın. Constructive method for detecting the information back- flow of non-markovian dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118:120501, Mar 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Non-markovianity, information backflow, and system- environment correlation for open-quantum-system pro- cesses

    Yun-Yi Hsieh, Zheng-Yao Su, and Hsi-Sheng Goan. Non-markovianity, information backflow, and system- environment correlation for open-quantum-system pro- cesses. Phys. Rev. A , 100:012120, Jul 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Flo- quet time crystals as quantum sensors of ac fields

    Fernando Iemini, Rosario Fazio, and Anna Sanpera. Flo- quet time crystals as quantum sensors of ac fields. Phys. Rev. A, 109:L050203, May 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and constraints

    Dominic Gribben, Anna Sanpera, Rosario Fazio, Jamir Marino, and Fernando Iemini. Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and constraints. SciPost Phys., 18:100, 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Genoni, Abolfazl Bayat, and Matteo G

    Victor Montenegro, Marco G. Genoni, Abolfazl Bayat, and Matteo G. A. Paris. Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals. Communications Physics , 6(1):304, Oct 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Boundary time crystals as ac sensors: Enhancements and constraints

    Dominic Gribben, Anna Sanpera, Rosario Fazio, Jamir Marino, and Fernando Iemini. Boundary time crystals as ac sensors: Enhancements and constraints. SciPost Physics, 18(3):100, 2025

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Com- putation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Exact solution of a boundary time-crystal phase transition: Time- translation symmetry breaking and non-markovian dy- namics of correlations

    Federico Carollo and Igor Lesanovsky. Exact solution of a boundary time-crystal phase transition: Time- translation symmetry breaking and non-markovian dy- namics of correlations. Phys. Rev. A , 105:L040202, Apr 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Entangled time-crystal phase in an open quantum light- matter system

    Robert Mattes, Igor Lesanovsky, and Federico Carollo. Entangled time-crystal phase in an open quantum light- matter system. Phys. Rev. A , 108:062216, Dec 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Michael J. W. Hall, James D. Cresser, Li Li, and Erika Andersson. Canonical form of master equations and characterization of non-markovianity. Phys. Rev. A , 89:042120, Apr 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Quantum non-markovianity: characterization, quantifi- cation and detection

    ´Angel Rivas, Susana F Huelga, and Martin B Plenio. Quantum non-markovianity: characterization, quantifi- cation and detection. Reports on Progress in Physics , 77(9):094001, aug 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Non-markovian quantum jumps

    Jyrki Piilo, Sabrina Maniscalco, Kari H¨ ark¨ onen, and Kalle-Antti Suominen. Non-markovian quantum jumps. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 100:180402, May 2008

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Goswami, C

    K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, C. Monterola, S. Shrapnel, J. Romero, and F. Costa. Experimental characteriza- tion of a non-markovian quantum process. Phys. Rev. A , 104:022432, Aug 2021

    work page 2021