Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 175 references

A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper presents the first comprehensive review of 89 clinical mental health datasets and 16 synthetic data resources for training AI clinical assistants, organized by disorder, modality, task, accessibility, and culture, with a gap analy

desk verdict A useful, well-organized catalog of clinical mental health datasets for AI, with a genuinely novel synthetic-data review; the 'comprehensive' claim needs a better search write-up and Table 2's size column needs cleaning. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09809 v2 pith:PL5R7TUP submitted 2025-08-13 cs.CL cs.AI

Aishik Mandal , Prottay Kumar Adhikary , Hiba Arnaout , Iryna Gurevych , Tanmoy Chakraborty This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords clinicalmentalhealthdatasetsAIassistantsdatasetsurveydataaccessibilitysyntheticmultimodalculturaldiversitydisorders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that AI for mental health is limited less by algorithms than by the data they learn from, and that no prior review has mapped the clinical datasets available for this purpose. It assembles 89 real-world clinical datasets and 16 synthetic resources, and sorts them by mental disorder, modality, task type, accessibility level, and cultural context. It claims this is the first review to do so, and the first to include synthetic clinical mental health data in the same map. The value of the map is practical: researchers building, testing, or comparing mental-health AI systems can see what data exists, who can access it, and where the holes are. The central gaps it identifies are missing longitudinal data, weak cultural and linguistic coverage, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and synthetic data that is almost entirely text-based.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a five-axis taxonomy, carried through tables and a Sankey diagram, that turns a scattered set of references into comparable distributions. The axes are: disorder (depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, PTSD, schizophrenia), modality (text, audio, video, EEG, MRI, and multimodal combinations), task type (binary classification, multi-class classification, questionnaire-score prediction, and therapeutic response generation), accessibility (public, restricted, or private), and cultural/linguistic context. The taxonomy is what makes the gap analysis possible: it converts subjective impressions about data scarcity into counts and categories that can be inspected and extend

What would settle it

Count clinically validated mental health datasets published in medical or clinical journals (for example, therapy transcripts or clinician notes with 50+ participants) that are not found by the keywords and sources the paper used; if more than a handful exist, the claim of comprehensiveness and the gap analysis built on it would need revision. A second check: attempt to download or apply for every dataset labeled public or restricted and record the actual success rate, which would test whether the accessibility distribution in Figure 1(b) reflects real availability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the landscape of clinical mental health datasets for AI can be systematically mapped along five dimensions — disorder type, data modality, task formulation, accessibility level, and sociocultural context — and that doing so reveals a field whose foundations are narrower than its ambitions. Its inventory covers 89 real datasets spanning depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and schizophrenia, using text, audio, video, EEG, and MRI, alone or in combination, plus 16 synthetic data resources. On its own analysis, most resources are private, most are small (often under 200 participants), and most come from a handful of English- or Chinese-speaking countrie

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes its keyword-based search of the three literature databases it queried captured essentially all relevant clinical mental health datasets, so the gaps it reports are real gaps rather than search misses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Using this map, researchers can identify which clinical datasets exist for a given disorder, modality, and access level before designing a study, instead of discovering them by chance.
  • Therapeutic response generation is nearly empty: among all reviewed datasets, only MEDIC supports it, so progress on therapy-session AI depends on new data collection rather than new architectures.
  • Because most datasets are private and small, model results reported on public corpora cannot be assumed to hold in clinical deployment.
  • The scarcity of longitudinal and culturally diverse data means generalizable AI for these disorders will require new collection efforts, not just better models.
  • Synthetic data is currently concentrated in English and Chinese text dialogues; creating multimodal and multilingual synthetic datasets would directly address the privacy and scale problems the paper identifies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence of the accessibility analysis: if each dataset's public/restricted/private label were verified by actually attempting to download or apply for access, the ratio would likely shift, because the paper's labels come from published descriptions rather than verified access.
  • Because clinical datasets published in medical-indexed journals outside the three searched literature sources may be absent, the gap analysis could understate coverage in EEG and MRI modalities; a companion search of medical literature databases would settle this.
  • The cultural-diversity argument implies that tasks such as depression detection should be benchmarked by language and dialect; a multilingual evaluation built from the identified datasets could test whether cross-dialect performance actually drops.
  • The emphasis on privacy suggests that public release of multimodal data will require anonymization methods with formal cross-modal guarantees; a practical benchmark comparing such methods on audio-plus-text or video-plus-audio pairs would be a direct next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys clinical mental health datasets intended for training and evaluating AI-powered clinical assistants. It claims to be the first comprehensive review of such resources, cataloging 89 real-world clinical datasets and 16 synthetic datasets. The datasets are organized along five dimensions: mental disorder (depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, PTSD, schizophrenia), accessibility (public/restricted/private), task type (binary and multi-class classification, questionnaire score prediction, therapeutic response generation), modality (text, audio, video, EEG, MRI, and combinations), and cultural/linguistic context. The paper also reviews synthetic data generation efforts and identifies gaps such as small sample sizes, limited cultural and linguistic diversity, lack of standardization, and missing modalities in synthetic data. It concludes with recommendations involving federated learning with local differential privacy, theoretically grounded multimodal synthetic data, and public release of anonymized multimodal datasets.

Significance. The review addresses a real gap: it consolidates many scattered clinical mental health datasets and provides structured comparisons (Tables 2–4) and visual summaries (Figures 1–3). If the inventory and dataset coding are accurate, the paper will be a useful entry point for researchers selecting training and evaluation data for mental health AI. The dedicated treatment of synthetic datasets is a genuinely useful addition that most prior surveys lack. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or code, but its contribution is catalogic and analytical, not derivational. The significance is thus conditional on the reliability of the search protocol and the correctness of the dataset table; both need substantial strengthening before the 'comprehensive' claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Introduction (search protocol)] The search description ('systematic search across Google Scholar, DBLP, and the ACL Anthology ... narrowed down to 89 datasets') lacks dates, full query strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, duplicate handling, screening agreement, and validation of accessibility labels. Since the central claim is that this is the first comprehensive review of clinical mental health datasets, the 89-dataset inventory and the gap analyses in Figures 1 and 3 are only as trustworthy as this protocol. Many relevant datasets appear in medical venues (e.g., Scientific Data, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Affective Disorders); a keyword scan of three sources, one of which is NLP-specific, can miss them. Please provide a PRISMA-style flow diagram with search dates and queries, and perform a recall check against the datasets included in prior systematic reviews (e.g., refs 15, 19, 24).
  2. [Table 2] The 'Size (P)' column mixes participants, visits, words, and records. Examples: WorryWords (44,450) is the number of English words, not participants; CHSN '6M (1M)' is visits (students); Gehrmann et al. '41,000 (41,000)' are clinical notes/mentions; Shen et al. contains three values in one cell. The caption defines P as participants. Because Figures 1 and 3 and the per-disorder/per-accessibility counts inherit these values, the quantitative summary cannot be independently audited. Rename the column (e.g., 'Size' with a per-row unit column), verify each entry against the source, and correct the caption accordingly.
  3. [Dataset Modalities section] The sentence 'Ten public datasets include all three modalities – text, audio, and video' is contradicted by Table 2: the ten TAV rows (E-DAIC, CMDC, VH DAIC, Schultebraucks et al., MEDIC, BDS, Chuang et al., Premananth et al., Zhang et al., Tao et al.) are almost all marked Restricted or Private; only CMDC is Public. If 'public' was not intended, please rephrase; the current wording overstates the availability of public multimodal data and conflicts with Figure 1(b) and the accessibility discussion.
  4. [Introduction and Table 1] The claim that no prior review is 'comprehensive' overstates the difference with existing surveys. Table 1 itself lists prior reviews covering up to 102–300 datasets with several of the same dimensions (e.g., refs 19, 23, 24 cover clinical data, disorder, access, task, modality). The distinctive contributions of this paper are the explicit cultural-context dimension, the synthetic-data review, and the focus on datasets rather than algorithms. I recommend rewording the novelty claim accordingly (e.g., 'first review that combines disorder, accessibility, task, modality, cultural context, and synthetic data' rather than 'first comprehensive review').
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] Row 99: 'Pend et al.' should read 'Peng et al.' to match reference 99.
  2. [References] Several references are duplicated: [7] and [13] are the same Dehbozorgi et al. paper; [8] and [14] are the same Shatte et al. paper; [9] and [16] are the same Iyortsuun et al. paper; [10] and [17] are the same Scherbakov et al. paper. These should be consolidated.
  3. [Figure 1(e) and Language and Cultural Diversity section] The text lists 'Taiwan, Taipei' in a way that suggests Taipei is a country; please correct geographic labels, e.g., 'Taiwan' or 'Taipei, Taiwan'.
  4. [Data Accessibility] In the paragraph on private datasets, the sentence 'As shown in Figure 1, private datasets represent the majority' should refer to Figure 1(b), for consistency with the other accessibility references.
  5. [Search protocol] The keyword list given in the Introduction should be moved to an appendix or supplementary material, along with the exact search strings and the date(s) of the searches, so that the protocol is reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No meaningful circularity: descriptive survey with no derived predictions; the single self-citation is background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a descriptive survey, not a derivation. The central claim is the comprehensiveness of a catalog of 89 clinical mental health datasets, supported by the described search protocol: a keyword search across Google Scholar, DBLP, and the ACL Anthology yielding 560 records, narrowed to 89 after deduplication and relevance screening. There are no equations, fitted parameters, or predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. The only self-citation is reference 176, used in the Privacy section to support the general statement that traditional anonymization is often single-modality and without formal guarantees. That claim is background context and does not carry the cataloging or gap-analysis argument. The comprehensiveness claim is vulnerable to search-recall limitations (e.g., missing PubMed-indexed clinical datasets), but that is a correctness and reporting concern, not circularity. Accordingly, the paper warrants a low score rather than a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

There are no fitted parameters or invented entities. The survey rests on three domain assumptions: the external prevalence data, the representativeness/completeness of the 89-dataset selection, and the accuracy of accessibility labels. The strongest of these is representativeness, which is under-supported by the reported search method.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The WHO and NIMH prevalence figures and disorder definitions used for categorization are accurate.
    The review organizes datasets by depression, anxiety, bipolar, PTSD, and schizophrenia based on these external sources (Section 'Mental Disorders').
  • domain assumption The 89 selected records are representative of the universe of clinical mental health datasets for AI.
    The central gap analysis depends on the completeness of the search; the paper does not provide a formal protocol or reproducibility log.
  • domain assumption Accessibility labels (public/restricted/private) assigned to each dataset reflect current reality.
    The paper assigns labels by reading source papers, but access status changes over time and is not verified with dataset providers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PL5R7TUP

@misc{pith2026250809809,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PL5R7TUP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09809}
}
read the original abstract

Mental health disorders are rising worldwide. However, the availability of trained clinicians has not scaled proportionally, leaving many people without adequate or timely support. To bridge this gap, recent studies have shown the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist mental health diagnosis, monitoring, and intervention. However, the development of efficient, reliable, and ethical AI to assist clinicians is heavily dependent on high-quality clinical training datasets. Despite growing interest in data curation for training clinical AI assistants, existing datasets largely remain scattered, under-documented, and often inaccessible, hindering the reproducibility, comparability, and generalizability of AI models developed for clinical mental health care. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive survey of clinical mental health datasets relevant to the training and development of AI-powered clinical assistants. We categorize these datasets by mental disorders (e.g., depression, schizophrenia), data modalities (e.g., text, speech, physiological signals), task types (e.g., diagnosis prediction, symptom severity estimation, intervention generation), accessibility (public, restricted or private), and sociocultural context (e.g., language and cultural background). Along with these, we also investigate synthetic clinical mental health datasets. Our survey identifies critical gaps such as a lack of longitudinal data, limited cultural and linguistic representation, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and a lack of modalities in synthetic data. We conclude by outlining key challenges in curating and standardizing future datasets and provide actionable recommendations to facilitate the development of more robust, generalizable, and equitable mental health AI systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09809 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An overview of the distribution of clinical mental health datasets reviewed in this work. (a) Distribution by mental health disorder, including schizophrenia (SZ), depression (Dep), anxiety (Anx), bipolar disorder (BD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (b) Distribution by dataset accessibility level: public, restricted, and private. (c) Distribution by task type: binary classification (BC), multi-class cla… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic overview of this review. This diagram illustrates the key dimensions covered in our review, including mental health disorder categories, dataset accessibility levels, task types, synthetic data sources, data modalities, and cultural or linguistic representation. The taxonomy offers a structured framework for understanding the landscape of clinical mental health datasets and serves as a guide for navigating… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sankey diagram depicting the distribution of dataset modalities across mental health disorders and their accessibility levels. The figure visualizes the types and combinations of modalities present in clinical mental health datasets for various disorders, along with their accessibility status (public, restricted, or private), highlighting gaps in data availability and openness across different disorders and formats.… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulation) (text with eea relevance) (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996

    Act, A. Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996. Public law 104, 191 (1996)

    1996

  3. [3]

    Shen, J. H. & Rudzicz, F. Detecting anxiety through reddit. In Hollingshead, K., Ireland, M. & Loveys, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology - From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality, CLPsych@ACL 2017, Vancouver, Canada, August 3, 2017, 58–65, DOI: 10.18653/V1/W17-3107 (Association for Computa...

    doi:10.18653/v1/w17-3107 2017

  4. [4]

    & Coppersmith, G

    Mitchell, M., Hollingshead, K. & Coppersmith, G. Quantifying the language of schizophrenia in social media. In Mitchell, M., Coppersmith, G. & Hollingshead, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and 14/23 Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality, CLPsych@NAACL-HLT 2015, June 5, 2015, Denver, Colorado...

    work page doi:10.3115/v1/w15-1202 2015

  5. [5]

    & Han, J

    Yoon, J., Kang, C., Kim, S. & Han, J. D-vlog: Multimodal vlog dataset for depression detection. In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022, Thirty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2022, The Twelveth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2022 Virtual Event,...

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21483 2022

  6. [6]

    C., Yaden, D

    Guntuku, S. C., Yaden, D. B., Kern, M. L., Ungar, L. H. & Eichstaedt, J. C. Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 18, 43–49 (2017)

    2017

  7. [8]

    Shatte, A. B. R., Hutchinson, D. M. & Teague, S. J. Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications. Psychol. Medicine 49, 1426–1448, DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719000151 (2019)

    doi:10.1017/s0033291719000151 2019

  8. [10]

    A., Hubig, N

    Scherbakov, D. A., Hubig, N. C., Lenert, L. A., Alekseyenko, A. V . & Obeid, J. S. Natural language processing and social determinants of health in mental health research: Ai-assisted scoping review. JMIR Ment Heal. 12, e67192, DOI: 10.2196/67192 (2025)

    work page doi:10.2196/67192 2025

Show all 175 references
  1. [11]

    Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 688–701 (2023)

    2023

  2. [12]

    Graham, S. et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: an overview. Curr. psychiatry reports 21, 1–18 (2019)

    2019

  3. [13]

    Dehbozorgi, R. et al. The application of artificial intelligence in the field of mental health: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry 25, 132 (2025)

    2025

  4. [14]

    B., Hutchinson, D

    Shatte, A. B., Hutchinson, D. M. & Teague, S. J. Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications. Psychol. medicine 49, 1426–1448 (2019)

    2019

  5. [15]

    & Wang, F

    Su, C., Xu, Z., Pathak, J. & Wang, F. Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review. Transl. psychiatry 10, 116 (2020)

    2020

  6. [16]

    K., Kim, S.-H., Jhon, M., Yang, H.-J

    Iyortsuun, N. K., Kim, S.-H., Jhon, M., Yang, H.-J. & Pant, S. A review of machine learning and deep learning approaches on mental health diagnosis. Healthcare 11, DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030285 (2023)

    2023 doi

  7. [17]

    A., Hubig, N

    Scherbakov, D. A., Hubig, N. C., Lenert, L. A., Alekseyenko, A. V . & Obeid, J. S. Natural language processing and social determinants of health in mental health research: Ai-assisted scoping review. JMIR Mental Heal. 12, e67192 (2025)

    2025

  8. [18]

    Laricheva, M., Liu, Y ., Shi, E. & Wu, A. Scoping review on natural language processing applications in counselling and psychotherapy. Br. J. Psychol. (2024)

    2024

  9. [19]

    D., Zech, J

    Malgaroli, M., Hull, T. D., Zech, J. M. & Althoff, T. Natural language processing for mental health interventions: a systematic review and research framework. Transl. Psychiatry 13, 309 (2023)

    2023

  10. [20]

    Mental health analysis in social media posts: a survey

    Garg, M. Mental health analysis in social media posts: a survey. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 30, 1819–1842 (2023)

    2023

  11. [21]

    Ahmed, A. et al. Overview of the role of big data in mental health: A scoping review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. Updat. 2, 100076, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100076 (2022)

    2022

  12. [22]

    & Doherty, G

    Thieme, A., Belgrave, D. & Doherty, G. Machine learning in mental health: A systematic review of the HCI literature to support the development of effective and implementable ML systems.ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.27, 34:1–34:53, DOI: 10.1145/3398069 (2020)

    2020 doi

  13. [23]

    H., Nazih, W., Alharbi, M

    El-Sappagh, S. H., Nazih, W., Alharbi, M. & AbuHmed, T. Responsible artificial intelligence for mental health disorders: Current applications and future challenges. J. Disabil. Res. 4, 20240101 (2025)

    2025

  14. [24]

    Uyanik, H. et al. Automated detection of neurological and mental health disorders using eeg signals and artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 15, e70002 (2025)

    2025

  15. [25]

    Tyagi, A., Singh, V . P. & Gore, M. M. Towards artificial intelligence in mental health: a comprehensive survey on the detection of schizophrenia. Multimed. Tools Appl. 82, 20343–20405 (2023)

    2023

  16. [26]

    A., Patras, I

    Sahili, Z. A., Patras, I. & Purver, M. Multimodal machine learning in mental health: A survey of data, algorithms, and challenges. CoRR abs/2407.16804, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2407.16804 (2024). 2407.16804. 15/23

    2024 doi arXiv

  17. [27]

    & Coppersmith, G

    Sarioglu Kayi, E., Diab, M., Pauselli, L., Compton, M. & Coppersmith, G. Predictive linguistic features of schizophrenia. In Ide, N., Herbelot, A. & Màrquez, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2017), 241–250, DOI: 10....

    2017 doi

  18. [28]

    Gehrmann, S. et al. Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives. PloS one 13, e0192360 (2018)

    2018

  19. [29]

    Mohammad, S. M. WorryWords: Norms of anxiety association for over 44k English words. In Al-Onaizan, Y ., Bansal, M. & Chen, Y .-N. (eds.)Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 16261–16278, DOI: 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.910 (A...

    2024 doi

  20. [30]

    Hou, Y ., Xu, J., Huang, Y . & Ma, X. A big data application to predict depression in the university based on the reading habits. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 1085–1089, DOI: 10.1109/ICSAI. 2016.7811112 (2016)

    2016

  21. [31]

    Turner, J. C. & Keller, A. College Health Surveillance Network: Epidemiology and Health Care Utilization of College Students at US 4-Year Universities. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 63, 530–538, DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1055567 (2015). Publisher: Informa UK Limited

    2015

  22. [32]

    Gideon, J., Provost, E. M. & McInnis, M. G. Mood state prediction from speech of varying acoustic quality for individuals with bipolar disorder. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2016, Shanghai, China, March 20-25, 2016, 2...

    2016

  23. [33]

    A., Pérez, D

    Islam, K. A., Pérez, D. & Li, J. A transfer learning approach for the 2018 FEMH voice data challenge. In Abe, N. et al. (eds.) IEEE International Conference on Big Data (IEEE BigData 2018), Seattle, WA, USA, December 10-13, 2018 , 5252–5257, DOI: 10.1109/BIGDATA.2018.8622447 (...

    2018

  24. [34]

    Banerjee, D. et al. A deep transfer learning approach for improved post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 60, 1693–1724 (2019)

    2019

  25. [35]

    Kathan, A. et al. The effect of clinical intervention on the speech of individuals with PTSD: features and recognition performances. In Harte, N., Carson-Berndsen, J. & Jones, G. (eds.) 24th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2...

    2023

  26. [36]

    Vergyri, D. et al. Speech-based assessment of PTSD in a military population using diverse feature classes. In 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2015, Dresden, Germany, September 6-10, 2015, 3729–3733, DOI: 10.21437/INTERS...

    2015 doi

  27. [37]

    Marmar, C. R. et al. Speech-based markers for posttraumatic stress disorder in us veterans. Depress. anxiety 36, 607–616 (2019)

    2019

  28. [38]

    & Ren, Z

    Hu, J., Zhao, C., Shi, C., Zhao, Z. & Ren, Z. Speech-based recognition and estimating severity of ptsd using machine learning. J. Affect. Disord. 362, 859–868, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.015 (2024)

    2024 doi

  29. [39]

    Cummins, N. et al. Multilingual markers of depression in remotely collected speech samples: A preliminary analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 341, 128–136, DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.097 (2023)

    2023 doi

  30. [40]

    Chang, K.-h., Chan, M. K. & Canny, J. AnalyzeThis: unobtrusive mental health monitoring by voice. InCHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1951–1956, DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979859 (ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 2011)

    1951

  31. [41]

    L., van der Sluis, F

    van den Broek, E. L., van der Sluis, F. & Dijkstra, T. Cross-validation of bimodal health-related stress assessment. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 215–227 (2013)

    2013

  32. [42]

    W., Glenn, J

    Salekin, A., Eberle, J. W., Glenn, J. J., Teachman, B. A. & Stankovic, J. A. A Weakly Supervised Learning Framework for Detecting Social Anxiety and Depression. Proc. ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.2, 1–26, DOI: 10.1145/3214284 (2018). Publisher: Assoc...

    2018 doi

  33. [43]

    Abbas, A. et al. Computer vision-based assessment of motor functioning in schizophrenia: Use of smartphones for remote measurement of schizophrenia symptomatology. Digit. Biomarkers 5, 29–36 (2021)

    2021

  34. [44]

    Shafique, S. et al. Towards automatic detection of social anxiety disorder via gaze interaction. Appl. Sci. 12, 12298 (2022). 16/23

    2022

  35. [45]

    K., Lim, M

    Langer, J. K., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. C. & Rodebaugh, T. L. Social anxiety disorder is associated with reduced eye contact during conversation primed for conflict. Cogn. therapy research 41, 220–229 (2017)

    2017

  36. [46]

    Pampouchidou, A. et al. Automated facial video-based recognition of depression and anxiety symptom severity: cross-corpus validation. Mach. Vis. Appl. 31, 30 (2020)

    2020

  37. [47]

    Jiang, Z. et al. Classifying major depressive disorder and response to deep brain stimulation over time by analyzing facial expressions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 68, 664–672, DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3010472 (2021)

    2020

  38. [48]

    Gilanie, G. et al. A robust method of bipolar mental illness detection from facial micro expressions using machine learning methods. Intell. Autom. & Soft Comput. 39 (2024)

    2024

  39. [49]

    & Lin, L

    Shen, Y ., Yang, H. & Lin, L. Automatic depression detection: an emotional audio-textual corpus and A gru/bilstm-based model. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2022, Virtual and Singapore, 23-27 May 2022, 6247–6251, DOI: 10.110...

    2022

  40. [50]

    & Vinciarelli, A

    Aloshban, N., Esposito, A. & Vinciarelli, A. Language or paralanguage, this is the problem: Comparing depressed and non-depressed speakers through the analysis of gated multimodal units. In Hermansky, H. et al. (eds.) 22nd Annual Conference of the International Speech Communic...

    2021 doi

  41. [51]

    Qin, J. et al. Mental-perceiver: Audio-textual multi-modal learning for estimating mental disorders. In Walsh, T., Shah, J. & Kolter, Z. (eds.) AAAI-25, Sponsored by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, February 25 - March 4, 2025, Philadelphia, PA, ...

    2025 doi

  42. [52]

    Tang, S. X. et al. Natural language processing methods are sensitive to sub-clinical linguistic differences in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. npj Schizophr. 7, 25 (2021)

    2021

  43. [53]

    & Sarzynska-Wawer, J

    Wawer, A., Chojnicka, I., Okruszek, L. & Sarzynska-Wawer, J. Single and cross-disorder detection for autism and schizophrenia. Cogn. Comput. 14, 461–473 (2022)

    2022

  44. [54]

    Hong, K. et al. Lexical use in emotional autobiographical narratives of persons with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Psychiatry Res. 225, 40–49, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.10.002 (2015)

    2014 doi

  45. [55]

    & Alonso-Sánchez, M

    Allende-Cid, H., Zamora, J., Alfaro-Faccio, P. & Alonso-Sánchez, M. F. A machine learning approach for the automatic classification of schizophrenic discourse. IEEE Access 7, 45544–45553, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908620 (2019)

    2019

  46. [56]

    & Jurafsky, D

    Iter, D., Yoon, J. & Jurafsky, D. Automatic detection of incoherent speech for diagnosing schizophrenia. In Loveys, K., Niederhoffer, K., Prud’hommeaux, E., Resnik, R. & Resnik, P. (eds.)Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: Fr...

    2018 doi

  47. [57]

    W., Rosenstein, M

    Elvevåg, B., Foltz, P. W., Rosenstein, M. & DeLisi, L. E. An automated method to analyze language use in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives. J. Neurolinguistics 23, 270–284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling. 2009.05.002 (2010). Language, Comm...

    2009 doi

  48. [58]

    Bedi, G. et al. Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths. npj Schizophr. 1, 1–7 (2015)

    2015

  49. [59]

    W., Weinberger, D

    Elvevåg, B., Foltz, P. W., Weinberger, D. R. & Goldberg, T. E. Quantifying incoherence in speech: An automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 93, 304–316, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres. 2007.03.001 (2007)

    2007 doi

  50. [60]

    Li, R. et al. Deciphering language disturbances in schizophrenia: A study using fine-tuned language models. Schizophr. Res. 271, 120–128, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.016 (2024)

    2024 doi

  51. [61]

    & Sommer, I

    Ciampelli, S., V oppel, A., de Boer, J., Koops, S. & Sommer, I. Combining automatic speech recognition with semantic natural language processing in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 325, 115252, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023. 115252 (2023)

    2023 doi

  52. [62]

    Çabuk, T. et al. Natural language processing for defining linguistic features in schizophrenia: A sample from turkish speakers. Schizophr. Res. 266, 183–189, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.02.026 (2024)

    2024 doi

  53. [63]

    Xu, S. et al. Automatic verbal analysis of interviews with schizophrenic patients. In23rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, DSP 2018, Shanghai, China, November 19-21, 2018, 1–5, DOI: 10.1109/ICDSP.2018.8631830 (IEEE, 2018). 17/23

    2018

  54. [64]

    Jeong, L. et al. Exploring the use of natural language processing for objective assessment of disorganized speech in schizophrenia. Psychiatr. Res. Clin. Pract. 5, 84–92, DOI: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20230003 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1176/ appi.prcp.20230003

    2023 doi

  55. [65]

    Parola, A. et al. Speech disturbances in schizophrenia: Assessing cross-linguistic generalizability of nlp automated measures of coherence. Schizophr. Res. 259, 59–70, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.07.002 (2023). Language and Speech Analysis in Schizophrenia and R...

    2022 doi

  56. [66]

    Aich, A. et al. Towards intelligent clinically-informed language analyses of people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. In Goldberg, Y ., Kozareva, Z. & Zhang, Y . (eds.)Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates...

    2022 doi

  57. [67]

    Arslan, B. et al. Computational analysis of linguistic features in speech samples of first-episode bipolar disorder and psychosis. J. Affect. Disord. 363, 340–347, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.102 (2024)

    2024 doi

  58. [68]

    & Novikova, J

    Tasnim, M., Ehghaghi, M., Diep, B. & Novikova, J. DEPAC: a Corpus for Depression and Anxiety Detection from Speech, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.12443 (2023). ArXiv:2306.12443 [eess]

    2023 doi arXiv

  59. [69]

    & Yellowlees, P

    Diederich, J., Al-Ajmi, A. & Yellowlees, P. Ex-ray: Data mining and mental health. Appl. Soft Comput. 7, 923–928, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2006.04.007 (2007)

    2006 doi

  60. [70]

    Hayati, M. F. M., Ali, M. A. M. & Rosli, A. N. M. Depression Detection on Malay Dialects Using GPT-3. In 2022 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), 360–364, DOI: 10.1109/IECBES54088. 2022.10079554 (2022)

    2022

  61. [71]

    Jiang, Z. et al. Multimodal mental health digital biomarker analysis from remote interviews using facial, vocal, linguistic, and cardiovascular patterns. IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Informatics 28, 1680–1691, DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3352075 (2024)

    2024

  62. [72]

    Valstar, M. F.et al. A VEC 2013: the continuous audio/visual emotion and depression recognition challenge. In Schuller, B. W., Valstar, M. F., Cowie, R., Krajewski, J. & Pantic, M. (eds.)Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Audio/visual emotion challenge, AVEC@...

    2013

  63. [73]

    & Cohn, J

    Dibeklioglu, H., Hammal, Z. & Cohn, J. F. Dynamic multimodal measurement of depression severity using deep autoencoding. IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Informatics 22, 525–536, DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2676878 (2018)

    2017

  64. [74]

    Alghowinem, S. et al. Multimodal depression detection: Fusion analysis of paralinguistic, head pose and eye gaze behaviors. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 9, 478–490, DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2634527 (2018)

    2016

  65. [75]

    & Mahmoud, M

    Lin, W., Orton, I., Li, Q., Pavarini, G. & Mahmoud, M. Looking at the body: Automatic analysis of body gestures and self-adaptors in psychological distress. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 14, 1175–1187, DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3101698 (2023)

    2021

  66. [76]

    Guo, W., Yang, H., Liu, Z., Xu, Y . & Hu, B. Deep neural networks for depression recognition based on 2d and 3d facial expressions under emotional stimulus tasks. Front. neuroscience 15, 609760 (2021)

    2021

  67. [77]

    DeVault, D. et al. Simsensei kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Bazzan, A. L. C., Huhns, M. N., Lomuscio, A. & Scerri, P. (eds.) International conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS ’14, Paris, France, May 5-9, 2014, ...

    2014

  68. [78]

    Zou, B. et al. Semi-structural interview-based chinese multimodal depression corpus towards automatic preliminary screening of depressive disorders. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 14, 2823–2838, DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3181210 (2023)

    2022

  69. [79]

    & Morency, L

    Stratou, G., Scherer, S., Gratch, J. & Morency, L. Automatic nonverbal behavior indicators of depression and PTSD: the effect of gender. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 9, 17–29, DOI: 10.1007/S12193-014-0161-4 (2015)

    2015 doi

  70. [80]

    Y ., Bonanno, G

    Schultebraucks, K., Yadav, V ., Shalev, A. Y ., Bonanno, G. A. & Galatzer-Levy, I. R. Deep learning-based classification of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma utilizing visual and auditory markers of arousal and mood. Psychol. Medicine 52, 957–967, D...

    2022 doi

  71. [81]

    Zhu, Z. et al. MEDIC: A multimodal empathy dataset in counseling. In El-Saddik, A. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2023, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 29 October 2023- 3 November 2023, 6054–6062, DOI: 10.1145/3581783.3612346 (ACM, 202...

    2023

  72. [82]

    & Salah, A

    Çiftçi, E., Kaya, H., Güleç, H. & Salah, A. A. The turkish audio-visual bipolar disorder corpus. In 2018 First Asian Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII Asia), 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/ACIIAsia.2018.8470362 (2018)

    2018

  73. [83]

    Multimodal assessment of schizophrenia symptom severity from linguistic, acoustic and visual cues

    Chuang, C.-Y .et al. Multimodal assessment of schizophrenia symptom severity from linguistic, acoustic and visual cues. IEEE Transactions on Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 31, 3469–3479, DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3307597 (2023)

    2023

  74. [84]

    Premananth, G. et al. A multimodal framework for the assessment of the schizophrenia spectrum. In Lapidot, I. & Gannot, S. (eds.) 25th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2024, Kos, Greece, September 1-5, 2024, DOI: 10.21437/INT...

    2024 doi

  75. [85]

    Zhang, J. et al. Automatic schizophrenia detection using multimodality media via a text reading task. Front. Neurosci. V olume 16 - 2022, DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.933049 (2022)

    2022

  76. [86]

    Classifying Anxiety and Depression through LLMs Virtual Interactions: A Case Study with ChatGPT

    Tao, Y .et al. Classifying Anxiety and Depression through LLMs Virtual Interactions: A Case Study with ChatGPT. In Proceedings - 2023 2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2023, 2259–2264, DOI: 10.1109/BIBM58861.2023.10385305 (Institute of ...

    2023

  77. [87]

    Cai, H. et al. A multi-modal open dataset for mental-disorder analysis. Sci. Data 9, 178 (2022)

    2022

  78. [88]

    Exploring individual differences of public speaking anxiety in real-life and virtual presentations, DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3048299 (2022)

    Yadav, M.et al. Exploring individual differences of public speaking anxiety in real-life and virtual presentations, DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3048299 (2022)

    2020

  79. [89]

    The mind research network uonm (2012) the center for biomedical research excellence (cobre). (2012)

    2012

  80. [90]

    Park, S. M. et al. Identification of Major Psychiatric Disorders From Resting-State Electroencephalography Using a Machine Learning Approach. Front. Psychiatry 12, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707581 (2021). Publisher: Frontiers

    2021

  81. [91]

    & Jernajczyk, W

    Olejarczyk, E. & Jernajczyk, W. Graph-based analysis of brain connectivity in schizophrenia. PLOS ONE 12, e0188629, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188629 (2017). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2017 doi

  82. [92]

    Wang, L. et al. SchizConnect: Mediating Neuroimaging Databases on Schizophrenia and Related Disorders for Large- Scale Integration. NeuroImage 124, 1155–1167, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.065 (2016)

    2015 doi

  83. [93]

    Bilder, R. et al. UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics LA5c Study, DOI: 10.18112/openneuro.ds000030. v1.0.0 (2018)

    2018 doi

  84. [94]

    Wang, L. et al. Northwestern university schizophrenia data and software tool (nusdast). Front. neuroinformatics 7, 25 (2013)

    2013

  85. [95]

    Gollub, R. L. et al. The MCIC Collection: A Shared Repository of Multi-Modal, Multi-Site Brain Image Data from a Clinical Investigation of Schizophrenia. Neuroinformatics 11, 367–388, DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9184-3 (2013)

    2013 doi

  86. [96]

    Silva, R. F. et al. The tenth annual mlsp competition: Schizophrenia classification challenge. In 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/MLSP.2014.6958889 (2014)

    2014

  87. [97]

    Keator, D. B. et al. The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository. NeuroImage 124, 1074–1079, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.003 (2016)

    2015 doi

  88. [98]

    Cai, H. et al. A Pervasive Approach to EEG-Based Depression Detection. Complexity 2018, 5238028, DOI: 10.1155/ 2018/5238028 (2018). _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2018/5238028

    2018 doi

  89. [99]

    Peng, H. et al. Multivariate Pattern Analysis of EEG-Based Functional Connectivity: A Study on the Identification of Depression. IEEE Access 7, 92630–92641, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927121 (2019)

    2019

  90. [100]

    Zhu, J. et al. Multimodal Mild Depression Recognition Based on EEG-EM Synchronization Acquisition Network. IEEE Access 7, 28196–28210, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901950 (2019)

    2019

  91. [101]

    A., Azhar Ali, S

    Mumtaz, W., Xia, L., Mohd Yasin, M. A., Azhar Ali, S. S. & Malik, A. S. A wavelet-based technique to predict treatment outcome for Major Depressive Disorder. PLOS ONE 12, e0171409, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171409 (2017). Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)

    2017 doi

  92. [102]

    F., Bismark, A

    Cavanagh, J. F., Bismark, A. W., Frank, M. J. & Allen, J. J. B. Multiple Dissociations Between Comorbid Depression and Anxiety on Reward and Punishment Processing: Evidence From Computationally Informed EEG. Comput. Psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) 3, 1–17, DOI: 10.1162/cpsy_a_00...

    2019 doi

  93. [103]

    Luo, G. et al. Exploring Adaptive Graph Topologies and Temporal Graph Networks for EEG-Based Depression Detection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 31, 3947–3957, DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3320693 (2023)

    2023

  94. [104]

    Garg, S., Shukla, U. P. & Cenkeramaddi, L. R. Detection of Depression Using Weighted Spectral Graph Clustering With EEG Biomarkers. IEEE Access 11, 57880–57894, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3281453 (2023). 19/23

    2023

  95. [105]

    Li, L. et al. Construction of a resting EEG-based depression recognition model for college students and possible mechanisms of action of different types of exercise. BMC psychiatry 23, 849, DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05352-0 (2023)

    2023 doi

  96. [106]

    Shen, J. et al. Exploring the Intrinsic Features of EEG Signals via Empirical Mode Decomposition for Depression Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.31, 356–365, DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3221962 (2023)

    2022

  97. [107]

    & Abimannan, S

    Chung, K.-H., Chang, Y .-S., Yen, W.-T., Lin, L. & Abimannan, S. Depression assessment using integrated multi-featured EEG bands deep neural network models: Leveraging ensemble learning techniques. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 23, 1450–1468, DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.022 (2024)

    2024 doi

  98. [108]

    F., Napolitano, A., Wu, C

    Cavanagh, J. F., Napolitano, A., Wu, C. & Mueen, A. The Patient Repository for EEG Data + Computational Tools (PRED+CT). Front. Neuroinformatics 11, DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00067 (2017). Publisher: Frontiers

    2017

  99. [109]

    Ros, T. et al. Neurofeedback Tunes Scale-Free Dynamics in Spontaneous Brain Activity. Cereb. Cortex (New York, N.Y.:

  100. [110]

    Nicholson, A. A. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: A preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI. NeuroImage...

    2020

  101. [111]

    Kim, J.-Y ., Lee, H. S. & Lee, S.-H. EEG Source Network for the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia and the Identification of Subtypes Based on Symptom Severity—A Machine Learning Approach. J. Clin. Medicine 9, 3934, DOI: 10.3390/ jcm9123934 (2020). Number: 12 Publisher: Multidisciplin...

    2020

  102. [112]

    M., Pinheiro, A

    Barros, C., Roach, B., Ford, J. M., Pinheiro, A. P. & Silva, C. A. From Sound Perception to Automatic Detection of Schizophrenia: An EEG-Based Deep Learning Approach. Front. Psychiatry 12, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.813460 (2022). Publisher: Frontiers

    2021

  103. [113]

    V ., Kaplan, A

    Borisov, S. V ., Kaplan, A. Y ., Gorbachevskaya, N. L. & Kozlova, I. A. Analysis of EEG Structural Synchrony in Adolescents with Schizophrenic Disorders. Hum. Physiol. 31, 255–261, DOI: 10.1007/s10747-005-0042-z (2005)

    2005 doi

  104. [114]

    A., Waltz, J

    Albrecht, M. A., Waltz, J. A., Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J. & Gold, J. M. Increased conflict-induced slowing, but no differences in conflict-induced positive or negative prediction error learning in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia 123, 131–140, DOI: 10.1016/j.ne...

    2018 doi

  105. [115]

    Tanaka, S. C. et al. A multi-site, multi-disorder resting-state magnetic resonance image database. Sci. Data 8, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01004-8 (2021). Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

    2021 doi

  106. [116]

    A rating scale for depression

    Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. neurology, neurosurgery, psychiatry23, 56 (1960)

    1960

  107. [117]

    Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The phq-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. general internal medicine 16, 606–613 (2001)

    2001

  108. [118]

    T., Ward, C

    Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. general psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961)

    1961

  109. [119]

    Zung, W. W. A self-rating depression scale. Arch. general psychiatry 12, 63–70 (1965)

    1965

  110. [120]

    Rush, A. J. et al. The 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (qids), clinician rating (qids-c), and self-report (qids-sr): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol. psychiatry 54, 573–583 (2003)

    2003

  111. [121]

    W., Muntaner, C., Smith, C., Tien, A

    Eaton, W. W., Muntaner, C., Smith, C., Tien, A. & Ybarra, M. Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Review and revision. The use psychological testing for treatment planning outcomes assessment 363–377 (2004)

    2004

  112. [122]

    Zigmond, A. S. & Snaith, R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta psychiatrica scandinavica 67, 361–370 (1983)

    1983

  113. [123]

    J., Carmody, T

    Rush, A. J., Carmody, T. & Reimitz, P.-E. The inventory of depressive symptomatology (ids): clinician (ids-c) and self-report (ids-sr) ratings of depressive symptoms. Int. journal methods psychiatric research 9, 45–59 (2000)

    2000

  114. [124]

    HEIMBERG, R. G. et al. Psychometric properties of the liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychol. Medicine 29, 199–212, DOI: 10.1017/S0033291798007879 (1999)

    1999 doi

  115. [125]

    Fountoulakis, K. N. et al. Reliability and psychometric properties of the greek translation of the state-trait anxiety inventory form y: preliminary data. Annals Gen. Psychiatry 5, 1–10 (2006)

    2006

  116. [126]

    L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J

    Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W. & Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The gad-7. Arch. Intern. Medicine 166, 1092–1097, DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 (2006). https://jamanetwork. com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/...

    2006 doi

  117. [127]

    Mattick, R. P. & Clarke, J. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety11editor’s note: This article was written before the development of some contemporary measures of social phobia, such as the social phobia and anxiet...

    1989

  118. [128]

    C., Biggs, J

    Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V . E. & Meyer, D. A. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity.Br. J. Psychiatry 133, 429–435, DOI: 10.1192/bjp.133.5.429 (1978)

    1978 doi

  119. [129]

    Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition

    Wolpe, J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Cond. reflex: a Pavlovian journal research & therapy 3, 234–240 (1968)

    1968

  120. [130]

    Weathers, F. W.et al. The ptsd checklist for dsm-5 (pcl-5) (2013)

    2013

  121. [131]

    B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T

    Blanchard, E. B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T. C. & Forneris, C. A. Psychometric properties of the ptsd checklist (pcl). Behav. Res. Ther. 34, 669–673, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(96)00033-2 (1996)

    1996 doi

  122. [132]

    Andreasen, N. C. Scale for the assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS) (University of Iowa, 2000)

    2000

  123. [133]

    Andreasen, N. C. Scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS). (University of Iowa Iowa City, 1981)

    1981

  124. [134]

    Andreasen, N. C. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: definition and reliability. Arch. general psychiatry 39, 784–788 (1982)

    1982

  125. [135]

    R., Fiszbein, A

    Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The positive and negative syndrome scale (panss) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. bulletin 13, 261–276 (1987)

    1987

  126. [136]

    Andreasen, N. C. Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication (tlc). Schizophr. bulletin 12, 473 (1986)

    1986

  127. [137]

    Chatgpt (2023)

    OpenAI. Chatgpt (2023). Large language model, accessed July 2025

    2023

  128. [138]

    & Zhang, Y

    Wu, Y ., Chen, J., Mao, K. & Zhang, Y . Automatic post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis via clinical transcripts: A novel text augmentation with large language models. In IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, BioCAS 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada, October 19-21, 2023,...

    2023

  129. [139]

    Liu, J. M. et al. Chatcounselor: A large language models for mental health support. CoRR abs/2309.15461, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2309.15461 (2023). 2309.15461

    2023 doi arXiv

  130. [140]

    Xu, J. et al. Mentalchat16k: A benchmark dataset for conversational mental health assistance. CoRR abs/2503.13509, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2503.13509 (2025). 2503.13509

    2025 doi arXiv

  131. [141]

    Yin, C. et al. Mdd-5k: A new diagnostic conversation dataset for mental disorders synthesized via neuro-symbolic LLM agents. In Walsh, T., Shah, J. & Kolter, Z. (eds.) AAAI-25, Sponsored by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, February 25 - March 4, ...

    2025 doi

  132. [142]

    Yao, B. et al. D4: a chinese dialogue dataset for depression-diagnosis-oriented chat. In Goldberg, Y ., Kozareva, Z. & Zhang, Y . (eds.)Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December...

    2022 doi

  133. [143]

    M., Cervone, A., Danieli, M

    Mousavi, S. M., Cervone, A., Danieli, M. & Riccardi, G. Would you like to tell me more? generating a corpus of psychotherapy dialogues. In Shivade, C.et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Medical Conversations, 1–9, DOI: 10.18653/v...

    2021 doi

  134. [144]

    BN, S. et al. Thousand voices of trauma: A large-scale synthetic dataset for modeling prolonged exposure therapy conversations. CoRR abs/2504.13955, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2504.13955 (2025). 2504.13955

    2025 doi arXiv

  135. [146]

    Xiao, M. et al. Healme: Harnessing cognitive reframing in large language models for psychotherapy. In Ku, L., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V . (eds.)Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, T...

    2024 doi

  136. [147]

    Maddela, M. et al. Training models to generate, recognize, and reframe unhelpful thoughts. In Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J. L. & Okazaki, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2023, Toronto,...

    2023 doi

  137. [148]

    & Lan, Z

    Qiu, H., He, H., Zhang, S., Li, A. & Lan, Z. SMILE: single-turn to multi-turn inclusive language expansion via chatgpt for mental health support. In Al-Onaizan, Y ., Bansal, M. & Chen, Y . (eds.)Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, Miami, Flor...

    2024

  138. [149]

    Soulchat: Improving llms’ empathy, listening, and comfort abilities through fine-tuning with multi-turn empathy conversations

    Chen, Y .et al. Soulchat: Improving llms’ empathy, listening, and comfort abilities through fine-tuning with multi-turn empathy conversations. In Bouamor, H., Pino, J. & Bali, K. (eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Singapore, December ...

    2023 doi

  139. [150]

    & Huang, M

    Sun, H., Lin, Z., Zheng, C., Liu, S. & Huang, M. Psyqa: A chinese dataset for generating long counseling text for mental health support. In Zong, C., Xia, F., Li, W. & Navigli, R. (eds.)Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL/IJCNLP 2021, Online Event, A...

    2021 doi

  140. [151]

    CBT-LLM: A chinese large language model for cognitive behavioral therapy-based mental health question answering

    Na, H. CBT-LLM: A chinese large language model for cognitive behavioral therapy-based mental health question answering. In Calzolari, N. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC/C...

    2024

  141. [152]

    Lee, S. et al. Cactus: Towards psychological counseling conversations using cognitive behavioral theory. In Al-Onaizan, Y ., Bansal, M. & Chen, Y . (eds.)Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, Miami, Florida, USA, November 12-16, 2024, 14245–142...

    2024

  142. [153]

    Zhang, C. et al. Cpsycoun: A report-based multi-turn dialogue reconstruction and evaluation framework for chinese psychological counseling. In Ku, L., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V . (eds.)Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and v...

    2024 doi

  143. [154]

    & Lee, G

    Kim, S., Kim, H., Do, H. & Lee, G. Multimodal cognitive reframing therapy via multi-hop psychotherapeutic reasoning. In Chiruzzo, L., Ritter, A. & Wang, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Lin...

    2025

  144. [155]

    & Lee, G

    Kim, S., Kim, H., Lee, J., Jeon, Y . & Lee, G. G. Mirror: Multimodal cognitive reframing therapy for rolling with resistance. CoRR abs/2504.13211, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2504.13211 (2025). 2504.13211

    2025 doi

  145. [156]

    Chim, J. et al. Overview of the CLPsych 2024 shared task: Leveraging large language models to identify evidence of suicidality risk in online posts. In Yates, A. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2024), ...

    2024

  146. [157]

    Cummins, N. et al. A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis. Speech Commun. 71, 10–49 (2015)

    2015

  147. [158]

    Slonim, D. A. et al. Facing change: using automated facial expression analysis to examine emotional flexibility in the treatment of depression. Adm. Policy Mental Heal. Mental Heal. Serv. Res. 51, 501–508 (2024)

    2024

  148. [159]

    Ringeval, F. et al. Avec 2017: Real-life depression, and affect recognition workshop and challenge. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge, A VEC ’17, 3–9, DOI: 10.1145/3133944.3133953 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, 2017)

    2017

  149. [160]

    Avec 2019 workshop and challenge: State-of-mind, detecting depression with ai, and cross-cultural affect recognition

    Ringeval, F.et al. Avec 2019 workshop and challenge: State-of-mind, detecting depression with ai, and cross-cultural affect recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop, A VEC ’19, 3–12, DOI: 10.1145/3347320.3357688 (Assoc...

    2019

  150. [161]

    Ringeval, F. et al. A VEC 2018 workshop and challenge: Bipolar disorder and cross-cultural affect recognition. In Ringeval, F., Schuller, B. W., Valstar, M. F., Cowie, R. & Pantic, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop, AVEC@MM 2018, ...

    2018

  151. [162]

    Sue, D. W. et al. Position paper: Cross-cultural counseling competencies. The Couns. Psychol. 10, 45–52, DOI: 10.1177/0011000082102008 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000082102008

    1982 doi

  152. [163]

    Cultural competence and metaphor in mental healthcare interactions: A linguistic perspective

    Magaña, D. Cultural competence and metaphor in mental healthcare interactions: A linguistic perspective. Patient Educ. Couns. 102, 2192–2198, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.010 (2019)

    2019 doi

  153. [164]

    Kirmayer, L. J. et al. Cultural variations in the clinical presentation of depression and anxiety: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J. clinical psychiatry 62, 22–30 (2001)

    2001

  154. [165]

    Birtel, M. D. & Mitchell, B. L. Cross-cultural differences in depression between white british and south asians: Causal attributions, stigma by association, discriminatory potential. Psychol. Psychother. Theory, Res. Pract. 96, 101–116 (2023)

    2023

  155. [166]

    Hofmann, S. G. & Hinton, D. E. Cross-cultural aspects of anxiety disorders. Curr. psychiatry reports 16, 450 (2014)

    2014

  156. [167]

    Ceylan, A. C. & Y ALÇINKAY A ALKAR, Ö. The cross-cultural differences in symptoms of schizophrenia: A systematic review. J. Cogn. Behav. Psychother. Res. 12, 179 (2023)

    2023

  157. [168]

    & Dalery, J

    Douki, S., Nacef, F., Triki, T. & Dalery, J. Les aspects culturels du trouble bipolaire: résultats d’une étude comparative entre des patients français et tunisiens. L’Encéphale 38, 194–200, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2011.04.003 (2012)

    2011 doi

  158. [169]

    Patel, A. R. & Hall, B. J. Beyond the dsm-5 diagnoses: A cross-cultural approach to assessing trauma reactions. Focus 19, 197–203, DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200049 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20200049

    2021 doi

  159. [170]

    & Naseem, M

    Aleem, M., Zahoor, I. & Naseem, M. Towards culturally adaptive large language models in mental health: Using chatgpt as a case study. In Farzan, R. et al. (eds.) Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW Comp...

    2024

  160. [171]

    E., Hanafy, R

    Zahran, N., Fouda, A. E., Hanafy, R. J. & Fouda, M. E. A comprehensive evaluation of large language models on mental illnesses in arabic context. CoRR abs/2501.06859, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2501.06859 (2025). 2501.06859

    2025 doi arXiv

  161. [172]

    & y Arcas, B

    McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S. & y Arcas, B. A. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Singh, A. & Zhu, X. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, AISTATS 2017...

    2017

  162. [173]

    & Chua, T

    Wu, S., Fei, H., Qu, L., Ji, W. & Chua, T. Next-gpt: Any-to-any multimodal LLM. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024(OpenReview.net, 2024)

    2024

  163. [174]

    Nagy, B. et al. Privacy-preserving federated learning and its application to natural language processing.Knowledge-Based Syst. 268, 110475, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110475 (2023)

    2023

  164. [175]

    Basu, P. et al. Benchmarking differential privacy and federated learning for BERT models. CoRR abs/2106.13973 (2021). 2106.13973

    2021 arXiv

  165. [176]

    & Gurevych, I

    Mandal, A., Chakraborty, T. & Gurevych, I. Towards privacy-aware mental health AI models: Advances, challenges, and opportunities. CoRR abs/2502.00451, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2502.00451 (2025). 2502.00451

    2025 doi arXiv

  166. [177]

    Counselbench: A large-scale expert evaluation and adversarial benchmark of large language models in mental health counseling

    Li, Y .et al. Counselbench: A large-scale expert evaluation and adversarial benchmark of large language models in mental health counseling. CoRR abs/2506.08584, DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV .2506.08584 (2025). 2506.08584. 23/23

    2025 doi arXiv

  167. [1991]

    27, 4911–4922, DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw285 (2017)

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.