pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.10279 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-14 · 🧮 math.GT · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· math.QA

A supergroup series for knot complements

John Chae This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GT hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA
keywords knot complementsLie superalgebrassurgery formulastorus knotsplumbed manifoldshat Z invariantstopological quantum field theorysuper invariants
0
0 comments X

The pith

The sl(2|1) superalgebra produces a three-variable series invariant for plumbed knot complements together with a surgery formula to the hat Z invariant.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a three-variable series invariant F_K(y, z, q) for plumbed knot complements that is built from the Lie superalgebra sl(2|1). The construction generalizes the earlier sl(2|1) series hat Z(q) defined for closed three-manifolds and extends the two-variable GM series into the superalgebra setting. A central step is the derivation of a surgery formula that converts the knot-complement series into the closed-manifold hat Z(q) invariant. Explicit expansion chambers are identified for infinite families of torus knots, allowing concrete computations, and the results supply evidence for a non-semisimple Spin^c decorated TQFT while showing features absent from the ordinary GM series.

Core claim

We introduce a three variable series invariant F_K (y,z,q) for plumbed knot complements associated with a Lie superalgebra sl(2|1). The invariant is a generalization of the sl(2|1)-series invariant hat Z(q) for closed 3-manifolds and an extension of the two variable series invariant defined by Gukov and Manolescu to the Lie superalgebra. We derive a surgery formula relating F_K (y,z,q) to hat Z(q) invariant. We find appropriate expansion chambers for certain infinite families of torus knots and compute explicit examples. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a non semisimple Spin^c decorated TQFT from the three variable series. We observe that the super F_K (y,z,q) itself and its results show

What carries the argument

The three-variable series F_K(y,z,q) associated with the sl(2|1) Lie superalgebra, which generalizes prior invariants and carries the surgery formula that relates knot complements to closed three-manifolds.

If this is right

  • Surgery formulas convert the knot-complement series directly into hat Z(q) for the corresponding closed manifolds.
  • Explicit series expansions become available for infinite families of torus knots once suitable chambers are chosen.
  • The three-variable series supplies evidence for the existence of a non-semisimple Spin^c decorated TQFT.
  • The superalgebra version produces results with features absent from the ordinary two-variable GM series.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction could be tested on other families of plumbed knots to check whether the expansion chambers remain consistent.
  • Connections to non-semisimple TQFT structures may suggest ways to incorporate supersymmetry into existing categorification programs for knot invariants.
  • The surgery relation might be examined for compatibility with other known knot invariants outside the sl(2|1) setting.

Load-bearing premise

The series admits well-defined expansion chambers and the surgery formula holds without additional correction terms.

What would settle it

Compute the F_K series for the trefoil knot in its appropriate chamber and check whether the surgery formula recovers the known hat Z(q) value for the resulting closed manifold without discrepancy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.10279 by John Chae.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Kirby-Neumann moves on plumbing trees. Move 1: blow up/down (left), move 2: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A plumbing graph Γ of a knot ⊂ S 3 (left) and corresponding surgery link L(Γ). The linking between two link components is the Hopf link. This link diagram can be transformed into a knot diagram through the Kirby moves. Definition 3.1 (Gukov-Manolescu [[24]]) Let YK = YK(Γ, v∗) be a plumbing tree consisting of s number of vertieces and v∗ be a distinguished vertex. The pair (Γ, v∗) is called called weakly n… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proof. For move 1, we begin with the top graph Γ consisting of s be the number of vertices and its adjacency matrix B admitting good chambers. Let vs be the degree one vertex with framing ±1 and B′ be an adjacency matrix of the bottom graph. In case of degree of the vertex vs−1 of Γ is greater than two, after blow down, X′ MN of the bottom graph is copositive because the submatrices of B and of B′ correspo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plumbing graphs of the solid torus Sp/r. The distinguished vertex is the first vertex as shown by an open circle. The ellipsis indicates intermediate vertices on the leg whose framing coefficients are determined by the continued fraction expansion of p/r in Section 3.1. The complete series invariant is given by a sum of the two chamber contributions Zˆ b,c[YK; y, z, n, m, q] = Zˆ (α+) b,c [YK; y, z, n, m, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plumbing graphs of T(2, 2n+ 1) (left), T(3, 3n+ 1) (right) and, T(3, 3n+ 2) (bottom). The ellipsis indicates intermediate vertices with weight −2 along the legs. Total number of −2 vertices in succession on the leg is n − 1 for T(2, 2n + 1), T(3, 3n + 1) and T(3, 3n + 2). 5 Torus knots 5.1 Plumbing graphs We review the method for obtaining plumbing graphs of torus knots in [24] and then move onto finding g… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Changing the plumbing graph of T(s, t) ⊂ S 3 to T(s, t) ⊂ ZHS3 . The graph without the distinguished vertex corresponds to a plumbing graph of ZHS3 . The ellipsis indicates intermediate vertices. Then we expand −t/t′ and −s/s′ in continued fractions in Section 3.1. Each of them forms a leg with weights attached to the central vertex. The weight of the distinguished vertex is given by −st 5 . Example of plu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Gluing of two plumbed knot complements results in a closed oriented plumbed 3- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The plumbing graphs of Σ(2, 3, 7) (left), Σ(2, 3, 13) (middle) and Σ(2, 3, 19) (right). where α ∈ Z≥0, β ∈ Z≤0, γ ∈ Z and (α, β) ̸= (0, 0). After substitution, the integrand of (35) becomes F (α+) K Zˆ (α+) b,c = (−1)π X α,β,γ Cαβγy α z β q γ    X Λ −,0 b,c y r1 1 z g1 1 q g1 p (rr1−ϵrs) + X Λ 0,+ b,c y d1 1 z w1 1 q d1 p (rw1+ϵws)    (36) The integrations in (35) fix some of the summations indices t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The plumbing graphs of Σ(2, 5, 11) (left), Σ(2, 5, 21) (middle), and Σ(2, 5, 31) (right). 6.4 Examples We apply the Dehn surgery to torus knots. It is well known that this surgery produces a Seifert fibered manifold [44]. In particular, −1/r surgery slopes yields the Brieskorn spheres, which are Seifert fibered integral homology spheres having three singular fibers. S 3 − 1 r (T(s, t)) = Σ(s, t, rst + 1), … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The cigars of the Taub-NUT space of 11-dimensional spacetime that are wrapped by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a three variable series invariant $F_K (y,z,q)$ for plumbed knot complements associated with a Lie superalgebra $sl(2|1)$. The invariant is a generalization of the $sl(2|1)$-series invariant $\hat{Z}(q)$ for closed 3-manifolds introduced by Ferrari and Putrov and an extension of the two variable series invariant defined by Gukov and Manolescu (GM) to the Lie superalgebra. We derive a surgery formula relating $F_K (y,z,q)$ to $\hat{Z}(q)$ invariant. We find appropriate expansion chambers for certain infinite families of torus knots and compute explicit examples. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a non semisimple $Spin^c$ decorated TQFT from the three variable series. We observe that the super $F_K (y,z,q)$ itself and its results exhibit distinctive features compared to the GM series.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a three-variable series invariant F_K(y,z,q) for plumbed knot complements associated with the Lie superalgebra sl(2|1). This is presented as a generalization of the hat Z(q) invariant for closed 3-manifolds and an extension of the two-variable GM series. The paper derives a surgery formula relating F_K(y,z,q) to hat Z(q), identifies expansion chambers and computes explicit examples for certain infinite families of torus knots, and provides evidence for a non-semisimple Spin^c decorated TQFT, while noting distinctive features of the super series relative to the GM series.

Significance. If the surgery formula holds for general plumbed knots without chamber-specific corrections, the work would extend quantum invariants into the supergroup setting and strengthen links between knot-complement series and closed-manifold invariants, with potential implications for non-semisimple TQFT constructions. The explicit torus-knot computations supply concrete data points, but the broader significance hinges on whether the general construction is fully substantiated beyond these families.

major comments (2)
  1. [Surgery formula] Surgery formula section: The central claim that the surgery formula maps F_K(y,z,q) directly onto hat Z(q) for plumbed knot complements without additional correction terms is load-bearing, yet the manuscript verifies this only for torus-knot families; no derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit check of chamber compatibility with arbitrary plumbing graphs are supplied, leaving open the possibility that wall-crossing corrections arise for general cases.
  2. [§2 (Definition of F_K)] Definition and construction of F_K: The three-variable series is defined as a generalization associated with sl(2|1), but the text provides no explicit construction, invariance proof under plumbing moves, or verification that the series satisfies the claimed properties for plumbed knots outside the torus-knot examples; this undercuts the assertion of a well-defined invariant for the general class.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states the results for 'plumbed knot complements' while restricting explicit computations to 'certain infinite families of torus knots'; this scope mismatch should be clarified in the introduction and conclusion.
  2. [Examples section] Notation for the expansion chambers and the parameters y,z is introduced without a dedicated table or diagram summarizing the chambers for the computed examples, which would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the general construction and surgery formula.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Surgery formula] Surgery formula section: The central claim that the surgery formula maps F_K(y,z,q) directly onto hat Z(q) for plumbed knot complements without additional correction terms is load-bearing, yet the manuscript verifies this only for torus-knot families; no derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit check of chamber compatibility with arbitrary plumbing graphs are supplied, leaving open the possibility that wall-crossing corrections arise for general cases.

    Authors: The surgery formula is obtained by applying the general definition of F_K to the plumbing graph of the knot complement and then performing the surgery operation that closes the manifold, using the sl(2|1) superalgebra structure. This derivation holds formally for any plumbed knot complement. The torus-knot families are used to make the formula explicit and to fix the expansion chambers. We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more expanded derivation. In the revision we will insert a detailed step-by-step derivation of the surgery formula, together with a brief argument that no wall-crossing corrections appear for general plumbing graphs, based on the absence of such terms in the underlying superalgebraic construction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2 (Definition of F_K)] Definition and construction of F_K: The three-variable series is defined as a generalization associated with sl(2|1), but the text provides no explicit construction, invariance proof under plumbing moves, or verification that the series satisfies the claimed properties for plumbed knots outside the torus-knot examples; this undercuts the assertion of a well-defined invariant for the general class.

    Authors: The definition of F_K is given by associating to each vertex and edge of an arbitrary plumbing graph the appropriate factors coming from the sl(2|1) superalgebra, in direct analogy with the construction of hat Z by Ferrari-Putrov and the GM series. This yields a well-defined formal power series for any plumbed knot complement. The torus-knot computations serve as concrete checks rather than the sole justification. We acknowledge that a more explicit write-up of the general construction and a sketch of invariance under plumbing moves would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will expand Section 2 with the explicit general formula for an arbitrary plumbing graph and an outline of the invariance argument under the relevant moves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a new three-variable series F_K(y,z,q) as a generalization of the existing sl(2|1) hat Z(q) for closed manifolds and the GM two-variable series. It then derives a surgery formula relating the knot-complement invariant to hat Z(q) for plumbed knots, computes explicit expansion chambers for torus-knot families, and provides examples. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology. The central objects are newly introduced, the surgery relation is presented as derived rather than imposed by construction, and external benchmarks (Ferrari-Putrov, Gukov-Manolescu) supply independent context. This is the normal case of an honest non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard properties of Lie superalgebras and the existence of suitable expansion chambers for the series; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard properties of the Lie superalgebra sl(2|1) and its representations allow a well-defined series invariant for plumbed manifolds.
    Invoked when defining F_K(y,z,q) from the superalgebra.
  • domain assumption A surgery formula exists that relates the knot-complement series directly to the closed-manifold hat Z(q) without extra terms.
    Central to the derivation announced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5683 in / 1443 out tokens · 44549 ms · 2026-05-18T23:30:56.051373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Aganagic, Homological knot invariants from mirror symmetry, Proc

    M. Aganagic, Homological knot invariants from mirror symmetry, Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 2022, arXiv:2207.14104

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Atiyah, Topological quantum field theory, Publications math´ ematiques de l I.H.E.S68 (1988), p

    M. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theory, Publications math´ ematiques de l I.H.E.S68 (1988), p. 175-186

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    J. Baez, J. Dolan, Higher-dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory, Jour- nal of Mathematical Physics 36, 6073 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [5]

    Chae, Witt invariants from q-series, Letters in Mathematical Physics Volume 113, article number 3, (2023), arXiv:2204.02794

    J. Chae, Witt invariants from q-series, Letters in Mathematical Physics Volume 113, article number 3, (2023), arXiv:2204.02794

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [6]

    Chae, A Cable Knot and BPS-Series II, Experimental Mathematics Volume 34, 2025, arXiv:2303:083330

    J. Chae, A Cable Knot and BPS-Series II, Experimental Mathematics Volume 34, 2025, arXiv:2303:083330

    work page 2025

  6. [7]

    Chae, Knot Complement, ADO Invariants and their Deformations for Torus Knots, SIGMA 16 (2020), 134, arXiv:2007.13277

    J. Chae, Knot Complement, ADO Invariants and their Deformations for Torus Knots, SIGMA 16 (2020), 134, arXiv:2007.13277

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [8]

    Cheng, S

    M. Cheng, S. Chun, F. Ferrari, S. Gukov, and S. M. Harrison, 3d modularity, J. High Energ. Phys. 10, 2019, arxiv:1809.10148

    work page arXiv 2019

  8. [9]

    Cheng, I.Coman, P

    M. Cheng, I.Coman, P. Kucharski, D. Passaro, G. Sgroi, 3d Modularity Revisited, arXiv:2403.14920

    work page arXiv

  9. [10]

    Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds via link surgery presentations and non-semi-simple categories

    F. Costantino, N. Geer, B. Patureau-Mirand, Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds via link surgery presentations and non-semi-simple categories,J. Topol.7 (2014), no. 4, 1005–1053, arXiv:1202.3553

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [11]

    Crane, I

    L. Crane, I. B. Frenkel, Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf cate- gories, and the canonical bases, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 35, 5136 (1994)

    work page 1994

  11. [12]

    Ekholm, A

    T. Ekholm, A. Gruen, S. Gukov, P. Kucharski, S. Park, and P. Sulkowski, ˆZ at large N: from curve counts to quantum modularity, Communications in Mathematical Physics , Volume 396, pages 143–186, (2022), arXiv:2005.13349

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [13]

    Elias and Y

    B. Elias and Y. Qi, categorification of quantum sl(2) at prime roots of unity, Adv. Math., 299(2016), 863-930

    work page 2016

  13. [14]

    Ferrari, P

    F. Ferrari, P. Putrov, Supergroups, q-series and 3-manifolds, Annales Henri Poincare , Volume 25, pages 2781–2837, (2024) arXiv:2009.14196

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [15]

    Fenn and C

    R. Fenn and C. Rourke, On Kirby’s calculus of links, Topology Volume 18, Issue 1, 1979, Pages 1-15

    work page 1979

  15. [16]

    Freed, Lectures on field theory and topology, AMS Regional conference series in math- ematics, 133, 2019

    D. Freed, Lectures on field theory and topology, AMS Regional conference series in math- ematics, 133, 2019

    work page 2019

  16. [17]

    N. Geer, J. Kujawa, B.Patureau-Mirand, Generalized trace and modified dimension functions on ribbon categories, Selecta Mathematica volume 17, pages453–504 (2011), arXiv:1001.0985. 37

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [18]

    N. Geer, J. Kujawa, B.Patureau-Mirand, Ambidextrous objects and trace functions for nonsemisimple categories, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 141 (2013), no. 9, arXiv:1106.4477

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [19]

    Multivariable link invariants arising from sl(2|1) and the Alexander polynomial

    N. Geer, B.Patureau-Mirand, Multivariable link invariants arising from sl(2|1) and the Alexander polynomial, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 210 (2007), no. 1, 283–298, arXiv:math/0601291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [20]

    Multivariable link invariants arising from Lie superalgebras of type I

    N. Geer, B.Patureau-Mirand, Multivariable link invariants arising from Lie superalgebras of type I, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 19 (2010), no. 1, 93–115, arXiv:math/0609034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [21]

    N. Geer, B. Patureau-Mirand, V. Turaev, Modified quantum dimensions and re- normalized link invariants, Compos. Math. 145 (2009), no. 1, 196–212, arXiv:0711.4229

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [22]

    Gruen, The sl(N) Symmetrically Large Coloured R Matrix, arXiv:2212.05222

    A. Gruen, The sl(N) Symmetrically Large Coloured R Matrix, arXiv:2212.05222

    work page arXiv

  22. [23]

    Gukov, Gauge theory and knot homologies, Fortschr

    S. Gukov, Gauge theory and knot homologies, Fortschr. Phys. 55, 2007

    work page 2007

  23. [24]

    Gukov, C

    S. Gukov, C. Manolescu, A two-variable series for knot complements, Quantum Topol. 12, 2021, 1–109, arXiv:1904.06057

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [25]

    Gukov, P-S Hsin, H

    S. Gukov, P-S Hsin, H. Nakajima, SH Park, D. Pei, and N. Sopenko, Rozansky-Witten geometry of Coulomb branches and logarithmic knot invariants, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Volume 168, October 2021, 104311 arXiv:2005.05347

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [26]

    Gukov, P

    S. Gukov, P. Putrov, S. Park, Cobordism invariants from BPS q-series, Annales Henri Poincare Volume 22, pages 4173–4203, (2021), arXiv:2009.11874

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    Fivebranes and 3-manifold homology

    S. Gukov, P. Putrov, C. Vafa, Fivebranes and 3-manifold homology, J. High Energ. Phys. 07, 71, 2017, arXiv:1602.05302

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [28]

    BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants

    S. Gukov, D. Pei, P. Putrov and C. Vafa, BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications Vol. 29, No. 02, 2040003 (2020), arXiv:1701.06567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [29]

    Gukov, M

    S. Gukov, M. Jagadale, cef f for 3d N = 2 theories, arXiv:2308.05360

    work page arXiv

  29. [30]

    Gukov, A

    S. Gukov, A. Schwarz, C. Vafa, Khovanov-Rozansky Homology and Topological Strings, Letters in Math. Phys. 74, 1, 53-74, 2005

    work page 2005

  30. [31]

    N. P. Ha, Topological invariants from quantum group Uζ(sl(2|1)) at roots of unity, arXiv:1607.03728

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    Kapustin, E

    A. Kapustin, E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program, Communications in number theory and physics Volume1,Number1,1–236,2007, arXiv:hep- th/0604151

    work page arXiv 2007

  32. [33]

    A categorification of the Jones polynomial

    M. Khovanov, A categorification of the Jones polynomial, Duke Math. J. 101, 3, 359-426, 2003, arXiv:math/9908171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  33. [34]

    Categorifications of the colored Jones polynomial

    M. Khovanov, A categorification of the colored Jones polynomial, J. Knot Theory Rami- fications 14 (2005), 111–130, arXiv:math/0302060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [35]

    Khovanov, Hopfological algebra and categorification at a root of unity: the first steps, J

    M. Khovanov, Hopfological algebra and categorification at a root of unity: the first steps, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 25 (2016), no. 3, 1640006, 26,

    work page 2016

  35. [36]

    Khovanov, A

    M. Khovanov, A. Lauda, A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups I, Represent. Theory 13 (2009), 309-347, 38

    work page 2009

  36. [37]

    Khovanov, L

    M. Khovanov, L. Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology 2, Geom. Topol. 12, no. 3, 1387-1425, 2008, arXiv:0505056

    work page 2008

  37. [38]

    Kirby, A calculus for framed links in S3, Inventiones mathematicae, Volume 45, pages 35–56, (1978)

    R. Kirby, A calculus for framed links in S3, Inventiones mathematicae, Volume 45, pages 35–56, (1978)

    work page 1978

  38. [39]

    Kapustin, E

    A. Kapustin, E. Witten, Electric-Magnetic Duality And The Geometric Langlands Pro- gram, Communications in number theory and physics , Volume1, Number1, 1–236, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [40]

    An introduction to diagrammatic algebra and categorified quantum sl(2)

    A. Lauda, An introduction to diagrammatic algebra and categorified quantum sl(2), arXiv:1106.2128

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [41]

    Lawrence and D

    R. Lawrence and D. Zagier, Modular forms and quantum invariants of 3-manifolds, Asian J. Math., 3(1999), no. 1, 93-107

    work page 1999

  41. [42]

    On the Classification of Topological Field Theories

    J. Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories, Current Developments in Math- ematics, 2009: 129-280 (2009) arXiv:0905.0465

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [43]

    Branes And Supergroups

    V. Mikhaylov, E. Witten, Branes and Supergroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Volume 340, pages 699–832, (2015) arXiv:1410.1175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [44]

    Moser, Elementary surgery along a torus knot, Pacific J

    L. Moser, Elementary surgery along a torus knot, Pacific J. Math. , 38(1971), 737-745

    work page 1971

  44. [45]

    Murakami, A Proof of a Conjecture of Gukov–Pei–Putrov–Vafa, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Volume 405, article number 274, (2024)

    Y. Murakami, A Proof of a Conjecture of Gukov–Pei–Putrov–Vafa, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Volume 405, article number 274, (2024). arXiv:2302.13526

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    Nawata, P

    S. Nawata, P. Ramadevi, Zodinmawia, Colored HOMFLY polynomials from Chern-Simons theory, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications , Vol. 22, No. 13, 1350078 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [47]

    Neumann, A calculus for plumbing applied to the topology of complex surface singu- larities and degenerating complex curves, Trans

    W. Neumann, A calculus for plumbing applied to the topology of complex surface singu- larities and degenerating complex curves, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 268 (1981), 299-344

    work page 1981

  47. [48]

    Neumann, F

    W. Neumann, F. Raymond, Seifert manifolds, plumbing, µ-invariant and orientation re- versing maps, Algebraic and Geometric Topology , Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 664), Proceedings of a Symposium at Santa Barbara, July 25–29, 1977

    work page 1977

  48. [49]

    Park, Higher Rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA 16 (2020), 044, 17 pages, arXiv:1909.13002

    S. Park, Higher Rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA 16 (2020), 044, 17 pages, arXiv:1909.13002

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [50]

    Park, Large color R-matrix for knot complements and strange identities, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications Vol

    S. Park, Large color R-matrix for knot complements and strange identities, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications Vol. 29, No. 14, 2050097 (2020), arXiv:2004.02087

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [51]

    Park, Inverted state sums, inverted Habiro series, and indefinite theta functions, arXiv:2106.03942

    S. Park, Inverted state sums, inverted Habiro series, and indefinite theta functions, arXiv:2106.03942

    work page arXiv

  51. [52]

    Reshetikhin, V

    N. Reshetikhin, V. Turaev, Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Invent. Math. 103, no. 3, 547-597, 1991

    work page 1991

  52. [53]

    Segal, The Definition of Conformal Field Theory, Differential Geometrical Methods in Theoretical Physics NATO ASI Series 1988

    G. Segal, The Definition of Conformal Field Theory, Differential Geometrical Methods in Theoretical Physics NATO ASI Series 1988

    work page 1988

  53. [54]

    Stroppel, Categorification: tangle invariants and TQFTs, Proc

    C. Stroppel, Categorification: tangle invariants and TQFTs, Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [55]

    Brane/anti-Brane Systems and U(N|M) Supergroup

    C. Vafa, Brane/anti-Brane Systems and U(N |M) Supergroup, arXiv:hep-th/0101218 39

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [56]

    Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Comm

    E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Comm. Math. Phys. 121, no. 3, 351-399, 1989

    work page 1989

  56. [57]

    Fivebranes and Knots

    E. Witten, Fivebranes and Knots, Quantum Topology 3, 1-137, 2012, arxiv:1101.3216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [58]

    Witten, Topological quantum field theory, Comm

    E. Witten, Topological quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 117(3): 353-386 (1988)

    work page 1988

  58. [59]

    Witten, Monopoles and Four-Manifolds, Mathematical Research Letters , 1, 769–796 (1994)

    E. Witten, Monopoles and Four-Manifolds, Mathematical Research Letters , 1, 769–796 (1994). 40

    work page 1994