Mitigating Jailbreaks with Intent-Aware LLMs
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SYSRC46Wrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Despite extensive safety-tuning, large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks via adversarially crafted instructions, reflecting a persistent trade-off between safety and task performance. In this work, we propose Intent-FT, a simple and lightweight fine-tuning approach that explicitly trains LLMs to infer the underlying intent of an instruction before responding. By fine-tuning on a targeted set of adversarial instructions, Intent-FT enables LLMs to generalize intent deduction to unseen attacks, thereby substantially improving their robustness. We comprehensively evaluate both parametric and non-parametric attacks across open-source and proprietary models, considering harmfulness from attacks, utility, over-refusal, and impact against white-box threats. Empirically, Intent-FT consistently mitigates all evaluated attack categories, with no single attack exceeding a 50\% success rate -- whereas existing defenses remain only partially effective. Importantly, our method preserves the model's general capabilities and reduces excessive refusals on benign instructions containing superficially harmful keywords. Furthermore, models trained with Intent-FT accurately identify hidden harmful intent in adversarial attacks, and these learned intentions can be effectively transferred to enhance vanilla model defenses. We publicly release our code at https://github.com/wj210/Intent_Jailbreak.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DT-Guard: Intent-Driven Reasoning-Active Training for Reasoning-Free LLM Safety Guardrail
A 4B LLM safety guardrail trained with reasoning supervision but deployed with reasoning-free inference outperforms 8B baselines on safety benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.