Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

The paper argues that rendering actions as 2D skeleton images, rather than encoding them as text or raw states, yields a unified and precise control signal for action-to-video generation of complex interactions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Skeleton-based visual action prompts give precise, cross-domain action control for video generation of human and robot interactions.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid and useful: rendering actions as 2D skeletons is a new control signal for video generation that works across human and robot data, but the missing appendix for the IRASim baseline reimplementation is a real soft spot. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.13104 v1 pith:VMD47GQQ submitted 2025-08-18 cs.CV cs.RO

Precise Action-to-Video Generation Through Visual Action Prompts

Yuang Wang , Chao Wen , Haoyu Guo , Sida Peng , Minghan Qin , Hujun Bao , Xiaowei Zhou , Ruizhen Hu This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.RO
keywords action-to-video generationvisual action prompts2D skeletonshuman-object interactionrobot manipulationcross-domain transfervideo diffusion modelsaction conditioning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Action-to-video generation faces a tradeoff: text and high-level skills are broadly applicable but cannot specify intricate hand or gripper motion, while embodiment-specific low-level states are precise but do not transfer across robot types or to humans. The paper tries to break this tradeoff by representing actions as visual prompts—specifically 2D skeletons rendered into the image plane—so action control lives in the same modality as the generated video. It builds scalable pipelines that recover hand skeletons from egocentric interaction videos and render gripper skeletons from robot state logs, then fine-tunes a pretrained video diffusion model on these prompt-video pairs. Across EgoVid, RT-1, and DROID, skeleton prompts beat both text and raw 7-DoF states on generation fidelity and interaction accuracy, and they enable joint training across human and robot data. If right, this gives a practical way to build action-controllable world models that learn interaction dynamics from heterogeneous video corpora.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that visual action prompts—actions rendered into image-space visual signals, chiefly 2D skeletons—form a unified action representation that is precise enough to control high-degree-of-freedom interactions and general enough to transfer across domains. Rather than asking a model to decode abstract text or embodiment-specific state vectors, the authors project action-induced 3D agent state into the same visual modality as the video the model generates. They build robust pipelines to obtain skeletons from human-object-interaction videos and from robot manipulation logs, fine-tune a pretrained video diffusion model to condition on these prompts, and report that skele

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the rendering operation $R(a_{0:t-1}) = v_{1:t}$, which maps an action trajectory into a sequence of 2D skeleton images in the camera image plane; this rendered sequence is the named 'visual action prompt.' The prompt converts heterogeneous action spaces—human hands, robot grippers, dexterous hands—into a common visual form, so a single pretrained video model can be conditioned through a trainable control branch with zero-initialized layers plus low-rank adaptation of the diffusion backbone. The skeleton prompt carries geometric precision while remaining domain-agnostic because it lives in image space.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the recovered 2D skeletons accurately tracking the true hand or gripper motion; if occlusion, tracking drift, or camera-calibration error separates the skeleton from the actual agent, the model cannot learn the promised precision or cross-domain transfer.

What would settle it

On a held-out set of robot episodes with heavy gripper occlusion or camera calibration drift, compare ST-IoU of the skeleton-conditioned model against the raw-7-DoF-state model on the same clips. If accuracy drops to the raw-state level whenever skeleton alignment error exceeds a few pixels, the precision advantage belongs to the recovery pipeline rather than to the visual-prompt representation itself.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • One model can be trained jointly on human egocentric interaction videos and robot manipulation episodes, and the joint model matches or improves single-domain performance while enabling held-out skills such as closing drawers on RT-1.
  • Skeleton prompts give finer interaction control than raw 7-DoF end-effector states, with ST-IoU rising from 0.507 to 0.604 on RT-1 and from 0.365 to 0.450 on DROID.
  • The same visual-prompt format covers different robot embodiments and human hands without re-encoding actions per agent, making heterogeneous data pools usable for training.
  • For applications that need still higher fidelity, skeleton prompts can be fine-tuned into mesh or depth prompts, which raise ST-IoU to 0.586 and 0.581 on DROID while keeping the same injection mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not say this, but if skeletons are a truly domain-agnostic action prompt, the same conditioning format should extend to other embodiments—quadruped locomotion, virtual characters, multi-finger hands—by adding rendering pipelines, with no change to the model architecture.
  • A testable extension: combine the skeleton prompt with sparse 3D joint or depth cues around the contact region. The authors' own ablation shows mesh and depth prompts already lift ST-IoU on DROID from 0.450 to 0.586/0.581, so sparse 3D cues may close most of that gap at a fraction of the acquisition cost.
  • If joint training succeeds because the skeleton simplifies the learning objective, then scaling the same recipe to a larger mix of interaction datasets (household tasks, assembly, sports) should keep improving held-out skill generalization; this is a quantitative prediction that can be checked by measuring ST-IoU on novel skills as data scale grows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes replacing abstract action representations (text, primitive skills, raw agent states) with rendered 2D skeletons as 'visual action prompts' for action-conditioned video generation. It introduces two data pipelines: a Wilor+SAMURAI-based tracker for egocentric HOI videos and a state-rendering pipeline with MatchAnything-based filtering and homography correction for robot episodes. These skeletons are injected into CogVideoX via ControlNet and LoRA. Experiments on EgoVid, RT-1 and DROID compare skeleton prompts against text conditioning and a reimplemented IRASim raw-state baseline, and also evaluate a unified model trained jointly on all three datasets, including held-out DROID labs/skills and RT-1 held-out skills. The paper claims visual action prompts achieve better action fidelity and cross-domain transferability than text or raw states.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper makes a solid practical contribution: a common visual action interface that lets one video generator be trained across human-object and robotic manipulation data, with a genuine held-out generalization setup (novel DROID labs and skills, RT-1 unseen skill) and dynamic-centric metrics rather than only reconstruction metrics. The architecture ablations and comparisons across prompt forms are informative, and the unified model improvements on DROID/EgoVid are encouraging. The main caveat is that the evidence is conditional: the raw-state baseline is an unvalidated reimplementation, the EgoVid evaluation uses 32 manually selected clips without error bars, and skeleton fidelity is not measured. None of these is fatal by itself, but together they mean the headline precision advantage is not yet established at the reported confidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1 / Table 1] The central comparison against agent-centric raw states uses a reimplementation of IRASim. The text states that 'We present quantitative comparisons between this reimplementation and the pretrained IRASim model in appendix,' but the arXiv v1 manuscript contains no appendix (the section ends at Sec. 5; references are followed directly by the limitations paragraph). This is load-bearing: if the reimplementation underperforms the official IRASim, the reported ST-IoU gaps (RT-1: 0.604 vs 0.507; DROID: 0.450 vs 0.365) could be due to baseline weakness rather than the skeleton representation. Please include the validation in the paper or release the reimplementation with trained weights, and report the official IRASim numbers on the same evaluation splits.
  2. [Sec. 4 / Table 1] EgoVid results are computed on 32 manually selected clips and no error bars or significance tests are reported anywhere in Tables 1-4. FVD and ST-IoU are noisy at this sample size, and manual selection risks bias toward clips where the pipeline works well. Please report confidence intervals (bootstrap or multiple seeds) and, where feasible, a larger random evaluation set. This is needed to support the claimed 'comprehensive superiority' and the unified-model gains (e.g., EgoVid FVD 1243.6 vs 1142.3).
  3. [Sec. 3.2 / Fig. 3] The paper's premise is that skeletons provide 'precise' action rendering, but no evidence is given that the recovered skeletons are accurate. HOI skeletons rely on Wilor+SAMURAI under severe occlusion; robot skeletons rely on MatchAnything episode filtering and per-frame homography correction with a threshold theta_IoU and homography warping. None of these steps is quantified (e.g., keypoint reprojection error, tracking retention rate, alignment success rate), and there is no ablation on skeleton noise. Because the method is only as precise as its conditioning signal, please add a skeleton-fidelity evaluation on a labeled subset (or synthetic renderings with ground-truth joints) and a test of sensitivity to injected joint noise.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 / Sec. 3.2] Typos: 'strucutres', 'representaion', 'camera drfit' should be corrected.
  2. [Algorithm 1] The subroutines HandnessFilter, Merge, NumberOfHandsFilter and the threshold theta_IoU are not defined in the text; please specify these operations so the pipeline is reproducible.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 / Table 1] For RT-1, the unified model is worse than the single-dataset model on PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS and ST-IoU but better on FVD. The statement that joint training gives 'improved or comparable' results should be qualified with a discussion of this trade-off.
  4. [Sec. 3.3] The loss amplification weight for hand/gripper regions and the clip-sampling bias around gripper-state changes are mentioned but not specified or ablated; please provide values and, ideally, a sensitivity study.
  5. [Sec. 3.3 / Eq. (2)] The dimensions of the trajectory encoder output are written as R^{T/4 x H/8 x W/8 x 16}; the downsampling factors should be defined explicitly and integer divisibility assumptions clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No substantive circularity; minor self-citation in data-pipeline tooling and an unvalidated baseline reimplementation are rigor concerns, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's contribution is an empirical representation study, not a derivation: it proposes visual action prompts (2D skeletons) as conditioning for action-to-video generation and compares against text (CogVideoX) and raw 7-DoF states (IRASim-style) on RT-1, DROID, and EgoVid. The skeleton is defined in Eq. 2 as a rendering R(a) of the action sequence, so the skeleton trivially contains the action; however, the claimed advantage concerns generated-video quality (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/FVD/ST-IoU and SAM-2 J&F) measured against ground-truth video, which is not forced by construction—the model could have failed to exploit the skeleton. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation reduces to its own input. The only same-group citation in the pipeline is MatchAnything [28] for episode filtering and homography rectification; it is tooling, not the load-bearing justification for the central claim, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. One genuine rigor problem is flagged: in Sec. 4.1 the paper states 'We present quantitative comparisons between this reimplementation and the pretrained IRASim model in appendix to demonstrate its effectiveness,' but arXiv v1 contains no appendix, leaving the raw-state baseline unvalidated. This affects the strength of the headline comparison but is a missing-support/correctness risk, not circularity, since the underlying comparison is empirical and could have favored raw states. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation and the unverified baseline, not a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are about the sufficiency and accuracy of 2D skeleton prompts and the reliability of the data construction pipelines, plus standard assumptions about fine-tuning pretrained video models. The free parameters are mostly unstated training and filtering choices that could affect the reported gains.

free parameters (5)
  • Loss amplification weight for hand/gripper regions = not specified
    Section 3.3 states 'we amplify loss values around hand / gripper regions' without quantifying the weight; it is a hand-tuned hyperparameter affecting interaction learning.
  • Clip sampling bias around gripper-state changes = not specified
    Section 3.3 says 'we sample more clips around timestamps where gripper state changes'; the sampling strategy changes the training distribution.
  • IoU threshold thetaIoU for tracklet association = not specified
    Algorithm 1 uses thetaIoU to decide when to start a new tracklet; the threshold is hand-picked.
  • ControlNet block count = 14
    Section 3.3: 'trainable copies of the first 14 blocks of the pretrained DiT'; chosen without reported ablation.
  • Episode filtering threshold for MatchAnything = not specified
    Section 3.2: episodes with 'significant matching coordinates discrepancy' are discarded; the threshold is unstated.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption 2D skeletons in image space preserve enough action precision for the video model to recover interaction dynamics.
    Core of Sec. 3.1; the paper chooses skeletons over mesh or depth for acquisition efficiency, accepting lower 3D fidelity, which is also noted as a limitation in Sec. 5.
  • domain assumption The hand tracking and robot calibration pipelines produce skeletons aligned with the video observations.
    Sec. 3.2 relies on Wilor, SAMURAI, MatchAnything, and homography rectification; accuracy is assumed from these tools.
  • domain assumption CogVideoX fine-tuned with ControlNet and LoRA can learn skeleton-conditioned action control without catastrophic forgetting.
    Sec. 3.3 adopts this recipe from prior work (CogVideoX, ControlNet, Wonderland) and assumes it works at the described scale.
  • domain assumption Scene-centric captions generated by Qwen2.5-VL do not leak action information that would confound the comparison against text conditioning.
    Sec. 4 implementation: captions exclude action and dynamic descriptions; if captions leaked action information, the skeleton advantage would shrink.
  • domain assumption The evaluation metrics, including PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, FVD, ST-IoU, and SAM-2 mask tracking, reflect action fidelity and dynamic correctness.
    Sec. 4 metrics section; photometric and perceptual metrics are used as proxies for action correctness.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precise Action-to-Video Generation Through Visual Action Prompts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMD47GQQ

@misc{pith2026250813104,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precise Action-to-Video Generation Through Visual Action Prompts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMD47GQQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13104}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present visual action prompts, a unified action representation for action-to-video generation of complex high-DoF interactions while maintaining transferable visual dynamics across domains. Action-driven video generation faces a precision-generality trade-off: existing methods using text, primitive actions, or coarse masks offer generality but lack precision, while agent-centric action signals provide precision at the cost of cross-domain transferability. To balance action precision and dynamic transferability, we propose to "render" actions into precise visual prompts as domain-agnostic representations that preserve both geometric precision and cross-domain adaptability for complex actions; specifically, we choose visual skeletons for their generality and accessibility. We propose robust pipelines to construct skeletons from two interaction-rich data sources - human-object interactions (HOI) and dexterous robotic manipulation - enabling cross-domain training of action-driven generative models. By integrating visual skeletons into pretrained video generation models via lightweight fine-tuning, we enable precise action control of complex interaction while preserving the learning of cross-domain dynamics. Experiments on EgoVid, RT-1 and DROID demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach. Project page: https://zju3dv.github.io/VAP/.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PhysEditWorld: A Large-Scale Dataset Toward Physics-Editable World Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PhysEditWorld is a new dataset of over 60 million frames from 12 UE5 cinematic scenes with synchronized multimodal signals and explicit gravity labels, built via replay to support physics-editable world models.

  2. Mask2Real-WM: Segmentation Masks as a Sim-to-Real Bridge for Controllable Dexterous World Models

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Segmentation-space dynamics pretrained on 50+ hours of simulation, then fine-tuned on under 2.5 hours of real data, plus a ControlNet RGB renderer, give per-DoF controllability across a 23-DoF dexterous hand.

  3. Controllable Egocentric Video Generation via Occlusion-Aware Sparse 3D Hand Joints

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new occlusion-aware control module generates high-fidelity egocentric videos from sparse 3D hand joints, supported by a million-clip dataset and cross-embodiment benchmark.

  4. Controllable Egocentric Video Generation via Occlusion-Aware Sparse 3D Hand Joints

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Sparse 3D hand joints plus an occlusion-aware control module produce higher-fidelity, 3D-consistent egocentric hand-object videos than dense-2D or implicit-pose baselines.

  5. PhysEditWorld: A Large-Scale Dataset Toward Physics-Editable World Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PhysEditWorld supplies 12 UE5 scenes, 60+ million frames, and explicit gravity labels via a replay paradigm to support gravity-faithful and physically editable world models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 25 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Easymocap - make human motion capture easier. Github,

  2. [2]

    Cosmos world foundation model platform for physical ai

    Niket Agarwal, Arslan Ali, Maciej Bala, Yogesh Balaji, Erik Barker, Tiffany Cai, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Yongxin Chen, Yin Cui, Yifan Ding, et al. Cosmos world foundation model platform for physical ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Interdyn: Con- trollable interactive dynamics with video diffusion models

    Rick Akkerman, Haiwen Feng, Michael J Black, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Victoria Fern´andez Abrevaya. Interdyn: Con- trollable interactive dynamics with video diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11785, 2024. 2, 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Diffusion for world modeling: Visual details matter in atari

    Eloi Alonso, Adam Jelley, Vincent Micheli, Anssi Kanervisto, Amos J Storkey, Tim Pearce, and Franc ¸ois Fleuret. Diffusion for world modeling: Visual details matter in atari. NeurIPS,

  5. [5]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923, 2025. 5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Introducing hot3d: An egocentric dataset for 3d hand and object tracking, 2024

    Prithviraj Banerjee, Sindi Shkodrani, Pierre Moulon, Shreyas Hampali, Fan Zhang, Jade Fountain, Edward Miller, Selen Basol, Richard Newcombe, Robert Wang, Jakob Julian Engel, and Tomas Hodan. Introducing hot3d: An egocentric dataset for 3d hand and object tracking, 2024. 3

    2024

  7. [7]

    Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Hila Chefer, Omer Tov, Charles Herrmann, Roni Paiss, Shiran Zada, Ariel Ephrat, Junhwa Hur, Guanghui Liu, Amit Raj, et al. Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, 2024. 1

    2024

  8. [8]

    Automatic rigging and anima- tion of 3d characters

    Ilya Baran and Jovan Popovi´c. Automatic rigging and anima- tion of 3d characters. ACM TOG, 2007. 2

    2007

  9. [9]

    Gen2act: Human video generation in novel scenarios enables generalizable robot manipulation

    Homanga Bharadhwaj, Debidatta Dwibedi, Abhinav Gupta, Shubham Tulsiani, Carl Doersch, Ted Xiao, Dhruv Shah, Fei Xia, Dorsa Sadigh, and Sean Kirmani. Gen2act: Human video generation in novel scenarios enables generalizable robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16283, 2024. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Zero- shot robotic manipulation with pretrained image-editing dif- fusion models

    Kevin Black, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Pranav Atreya, Homer Walke, Chelsea Finn, Aviral Kumar, and Sergey Levine. Zero- shot robotic manipulation with pretrained image-editing dif- fusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10639, 2023. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakr- ishnan, Karol Hausman, Alex Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, et al. Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817, 2022. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Genie: Generative interactive environments

    Jake Bruce, Michael D Dennis, Ashley Edwards, Jack Parker- Holder, Yuge Shi, Edward Hughes, Matthew Lai, Aditi Mavalankar, Richie Steigerwald, Chris Apps, et al. Genie: Generative interactive environments. In ICML, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  13. [13]

    1C filter: a simple speed-based low-pass filter for noisy input in interac- tive systems

    G´ery Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, and Daniel V ogel. 1C filter: a simple speed-based low-pass filter for noisy input in interac- tive systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2012. 4

    2012

  14. [14]

    Gamegen-x: Interactive open-world game video generation

    Haoxuan Che, Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Cheng Jin, and Hao Chen. Gamegen-x: Interactive open-world game video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00769, 2024. 1, 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset

    Dima Damen, Hazel Doughty, Giovanni Maria Farinella, Sanja Fidler, Antonino Furnari, Evangelos Kazakos, Davide Moltisanti, Jonathan Munro, Toby Perrett, Will Price, et al. Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset. In ECCV, 2018. 3

    2018

  16. [16]

    Oasis: A universe in a transformer,

    Etched Decart, Spruce Campbell, Quinn McIntyre, Xinlei Chen, and Julian Quevedo. Oasis: A universe in a transformer,

  17. [17]

    Genie 2: A large-scale foundation world model,

    DeepMind. Genie 2: A large-scale foundation world model,

  18. [18]

    Motion capture from internet videos

    Junting Dong, Qing Shuai, Yuanqing Zhang, Xian Liu, Xi- aowei Zhou, and Hujun Bao. Motion capture from internet videos. In ECCV, 2020. 2

    2020

  19. [19]

    Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel

    Yilun Du, Mengjiao Yang, Bo Dai, Hanjun Dai, Ofir Nachum, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation,

  20. [20]

    Arctic: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand- object manipulation

    Zicong Fan, Omid Taheri, Dimitrios Tzionas, Muhammed Kocabas, Manuel Kaufmann, Michael J Black, and Otmar Hilliges. Arctic: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand- object manipulation. In CVPR, 2023. 3

    2023

  21. [21]

    The matrix: Infinite-horizon world generation with real-time moving control

    Ruili Feng, Han Zhang, Zhantao Yang, Jie Xiao, Zhilei Shu, Zhiheng Liu, Andy Zheng, Yukun Huang, Yu Liu, and Hongyang Zhang. The matrix: Infinite-horizon world generation with real-time moving control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03568, 2024. 1, 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Gigahands: A massive annotated dataset of bimanual hand activities, 2024

    Rao Fu, Dingxi Zhang, Alex Jiang, Wanjia Fu, Austin Funk, Daniel Ritchie, and Srinath Sridhar. Gigahands: A massive annotated dataset of bimanual hand activities, 2024. 3

    2024

  23. [23]

    Vista: A generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile controllability

    Shenyuan Gao, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Kashyap Chitta, Yihang Qiu, Andreas Geiger, Jun Zhang, and Hongyang Li. Vista: A generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile controllability. NeurIPS, 2025. 2

    2025

  24. [24]

    Motion prompting: Controlling video generation with motion trajec- tories

    Daniel Geng, Charles Herrmann, Junhwa Hur, Forrester Cole, Serena Zhang, Tobias Pfaff, Tatiana Lopez-Guevara, Carl Doersch, Yusuf Aytar, Michael Rubinstein, et al. Motion prompting: Controlling video generation with motion trajec- tories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02700, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    The ”something something” video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense, 2017

    Raghav Goyal, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Vincent Michalski, Joanna Materzy´nska, Susanne Westphal, Heuna Kim, Valentin Haenel, Ingo Fruend, Peter Yianilos, Moritz Mueller-Freitag, Florian Hoppe, Christian Thurau, Ingo Bax, and Roland Memisevic. The ”something something” video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense, 2017. 3

    2017

  26. [26]

    Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In CVPR, 2022. 3, 7

    2022

  27. [27]

    Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first- and third-person perspectives

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Lorenzo Torresani, Kris Kitani, Jitendra Malik, Triantafyllos Afouras, Kumar 9 Ashutosh, Vijay Baiyya, Siddhant Bansal, Bikram Boote, et al. Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first- and third-person perspectives. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    2024

  28. [28]

    Matchanything: Universal cross-modality image matching with large-scale pre-training

    Xingyi He, Hao Yu, Sida Peng, Dongli Tan, Zehong Shen, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Matchanything: Universal cross-modality image matching with large-scale pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07556, 2025. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Hand-eye calibration

    Radu Horaud and Fadi Dornaika. Hand-eye calibration. The international journal of robotics research, 1995. 2

    1995

  30. [30]

    LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR,

  31. [31]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation

    Li Hu. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation. In CVPR, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  32. [32]

    Ani- mate anyone 2: High-fidelity character image animation with environment affordance

    Li Hu, Guangyuan Wang, Zhen Shen, Xin Gao, Dechao Meng, Lian Zhuo, Peng Zhang, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. Ani- mate anyone 2: High-fidelity character image animation with environment affordance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06145,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Co- tracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos

    Nikita Karaev, Iurii Makarov, Jianyuan Wang, Natalia Neverova, Andrea Vedaldi, and Christian Rupprecht. Co- tracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.11831, 2024. 5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    The kinetics human action video dataset, 2017

    Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, Mustafa Suleyman, and Andrew Zisserman. The kinetics human action video dataset, 2017. 3

    2017

  35. [35]

    Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot ma- nipulation dataset

    Alexander Khazatsky, Karl Pertsch, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Bal- akrishna, Sudeep Dasari, Siddharth Karamcheti, Soroush Nasiriany, Mohan Kumar Srirama, Lawrence Yunliang Chen, Kirsty Ellis, et al. Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot ma- nipulation dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12945, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els

    Rawal Khirodkar, Timur Bagautdinov, Julieta Martinez, Su Zhaoen, Austin James, Peter Selednik, Stuart Anderson, and Shunsuke Saito. Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els. In ECCV, 2024. 4

    2024

  37. [37]

    Learning to act from actionless videos through dense correspondences

    Po-Chen Ko, Jiayuan Mao, Yilun Du, Shao-Hua Sun, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. Learning to act from actionless videos through dense correspondences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08576, 2023. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Pose space deformation: a unified approach to shape interpolation and skeleton-driven deformation

    John P Lewis, Matt Cordner, and Nickson Fong. Pose space deformation: a unified approach to shape interpolation and skeleton-driven deformation. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2. 2023. 2

    2023

  39. [39]

    Wonderland: Navigating 3d scenes from a single image

    Hanwen Liang, Junli Cao, Vidit Goel, Guocheng Qian, Sergei Korolev, Demetri Terzopoulos, Konstantinos N Plataniotis, Sergey Tulyakov, and Jian Ren. Wonderland: Navigating 3d scenes from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12091,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Taco: Benchmarking general- izable bimanual tool-action-object understanding

    Yun Liu, Haolin Yang, Xu Si, Ling Liu, Zipeng Li, Yuxiang Zhang, Yebin Liu, and Li Yi. Taco: Benchmarking general- izable bimanual tool-action-object understanding. In CVPR,

  41. [41]

    The babyview dataset: High-resolution egocentric videos of infants’ and young children’s everyday experiences

    Bria Long, Violet Xiang, Stefan Stojanov, Robert Z Sparks, Zi Yin, Grace E Keene, Alvin WM Tan, Steven Y Feng, Chengxu Zhuang, Virginia A Marchman, et al. The babyview dataset: High-resolution egocentric videos of infants’ and young children’s everyday experiences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10447, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Mediapipe: A framework for building perception pipelines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172, 2019

    Camillo Lugaresi, Jiuqiang Tang, Hadon Nash, Chris Mc- Clanahan, Esha Uboweja, Michael Hays, Fan Zhang, Chuo- Ling Chang, Ming Guang Yong, Juhyun Lee, et al. Mediapipe: A framework for building perception pipelines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172, 2019. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  43. [43]

    Mimo: Controllable character video synthesis with spatial decomposed modeling

    Yifang Men, Yuan Yao, Miaomiao Cui, and Liefeng Bo. Mimo: Controllable character video synthesis with spatial decomposed modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16160 ,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Do generative video models understand physical principles? arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09038, 2025

    Saman Motamed, Laura Culp, Kevin Swersky, Priyank Jaini, and Robert Geirhos. Do generative video models understand physical principles? arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09038, 2025. 5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    A survey on deep learning for skeleton-based human animation

    Lucas Mourot, Ludovic Hoyet, Franc ¸ois Le Clerc, Franc ¸ois Schnitzler, and Pierre Hellier. A survey on deep learning for skeleton-based human animation. In Computer Graphics Forum, 2022. 2

    2022

  46. [46]

    Openai sora, 2023

    OpenAI. Openai sora, 2023. 1

    2023

  47. [47]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhiram Maddukuri, Ab- hishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Poo- ley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, Ajinkya Jain, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In ICRA, 2024. 3

    2024

  48. [48]

    Computer animation: algorithms and techniques

    Rick Parent. Computer animation: algorithms and techniques

  49. [49]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In ICCV, 2023. 5

    2023

  50. [50]

    Sampson, Shikai Li, Simone Parmeggiani, Steve Fine, Tara Fowler, Vladan Petrovic, and Yuming Du

    Adam Polyak, Amit Zohar, Andrew Brown, Andros Tjan- dra, Animesh Sinha, Ann Lee, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Chih-Yao Ma, Ching-Yao Chuang, David Yan, Dhruv Choud- hary, Dingkang Wang, Geet Sethi, Guan Pang, Haoyu Ma, Ishan Misra, Ji Hou, Jialiang Wang, Kiran Jagadeesh, Kun- peng Li, Luxin Zhang, Mannat Singh, Mary Williamson, Matt Le, Matthew Yu, Mitesh Kuma...

  51. [51]

    Wilor: End-to-end 3d hand localization and reconstruction in-the-wild

    Rolandos Alexandros Potamias, Jinglei Zhang, Jiankang Deng, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Wilor: End-to-end 3d hand localization and reconstruction in-the-wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12259, 2024. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Sam 2: Segment any- thing in images and videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. Sam 2: Segment any- thing in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    World-grounded human motion recovery via gravity-view co- ordinates

    Zehong Shen, Huaijin Pi, Yan Xia, Zhi Cen, Sida Peng, Zechen Hu, Hujun Bao, Ruizhen Hu, and Xiaowei Zhou. World-grounded human motion recovery via gravity-view co- ordinates. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, 2024. 2

    2024

  54. [54]

    Motion-i2v: Consistent and controllable image-to-video gen- eration with explicit motion modeling, 2024

    Xiaoyu Shi, Zhaoyang Huang, Fu-Yun Wang, Weikang Bian, Dasong Li, Yi Zhang, Manyuan Zhang, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Hongwei Qin, Jifeng Dai, and Hongsheng Li. Motion-i2v: Consistent and controllable image-to-video gen- eration with explicit motion modeling, 2024. 3

    2024

  55. [55]

    Genhowto: Learning to generate actions and state transformations from instructional videos

    Tom´aˇs Souˇcek, Dima Damen, Michael Wray, Ivan Laptev, and Josef Sivic. Genhowto: Learning to generate actions and state transformations from instructional videos. In CVPR,

  56. [56]

    Optimal hand-eye cali- bration

    Klaus H Strobl and Gerd Hirzinger. Optimal hand-eye cali- bration. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intel- ligent robots and systems, 2006. 2

    2006

  57. [57]

    Controlling the world by sleight of hand

    Sruthi Sudhakar, Ruoshi Liu, Basile Van Hoorick, Carl V on- drick, and Richard Zemel. Controlling the world by sleight of hand. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  58. [58]

    Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow

    Zachary Teed and Jia Deng. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow. In European conference on com- puter vision, pages 402–419. Springer, 2020. 5

    2020

  59. [59]

    A new technique for fully autonomous and efficient 3 d robotics hand/eye calibration

    Roger Y Tsai, Reimar K Lenz, et al. A new technique for fully autonomous and efficient 3 d robotics hand/eye calibration. IEEE Transactions on robotics and automation, 1989. 2

    1989

  60. [60]

    Fvd: A new metric for video generation

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Rapha¨el Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Fvd: A new metric for video generation. ICLR workshop, 2019. 5

    2019

  61. [61]

    Diffusion models are real-time game engines

    Dani Valevski, Yaniv Leviathan, Moab Arar, and Shlomi Fruchter. Diffusion models are real-time game engines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14837, 2024. 1, 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Boximator: Generating rich and controllable motions for video synthesis

    Jiawei Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Jiaxin Zou, Yan Zeng, Guoqiang Wei, Liping Yuan, and Hang Li. Boximator: Generating rich and controllable motions for video synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01566, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Motion inversion for video customization

    Luozhou Wang, Ziyang Mai, Guibao Shen, Yixun Liang, Xin Tao, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Yijun Li, and Yingcong Chen. Motion inversion for video customization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20193, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Egovid-5m: A large-scale video-action dataset for egocentric video generation

    Xiaofeng Wang, Kang Zhao, Feng Liu, Jiayu Wang, Gu- osheng Zhao, Xiaoyi Bao, Zheng Zhu, Yingya Zhang, and Xingang Wang. Egovid-5m: A large-scale video-action dataset for egocentric video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08380, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE TIP, 2004. 5

    2004

  66. [66]

    Mo- tionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation

    Zhouxia Wang, Ziyang Yuan, Xintao Wang, Yaowei Li, Tian- shui Chen, Menghan Xia, Ping Luo, and Ying Shan. Mo- tionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers,

    2024

  67. [67]

    ivideogpt: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models

    Jialong Wu, Shaofeng Yin, Ningya Feng, Xu He, Dong Li, Jianye Hao, and Mingsheng Long. ivideogpt: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models. NeurIPS, 2025. 2

    2025

  68. [68]

    Samurai: Adapt- ing segment anything model for zero-shot visual tracking with motion-aware memory, 2024

    Cheng-Yen Yang, Hsiang-Wei Huang, Wenhao Chai, Zhongyu Jiang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Samurai: Adapt- ing segment anything model for zero-shot visual tracking with motion-aware memory, 2024. 4

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.