REVIEW 6 cited by
Exploring Autonomous Agents: A Closer Look at Why They Fail When Completing Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Autonomous agent systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities in automating complex tasks. However, current evaluations largely rely on success rates without systematically analyzing the interactions, communication mechanisms, and failure causes within these systems. To bridge this gap, we present a benchmark of 34 representative programmable tasks designed to rigorously assess autonomous agents. Using this benchmark, we evaluate three popular open-source agent frameworks combined with two LLM backbones, observing a task completion rate of approximately 50%. Through in-depth failure analysis, we develop a three-tier taxonomy of failure causes aligned with task phases, highlighting planning errors, task execution issues, and incorrect response generation. Based on these insights, we propose actionable improvements to enhance agent planning and self-diagnosis capabilities. Our failure taxonomy, together with mitigation advice, provides an empirical foundation for developing more robust and effective autonomous agent systems in the future.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Failure as a Process: An Anatomy of CLI Coding Agent Trajectories
Across 1,794 CLI agent trajectories, failures are mostly epistemic, start by median step 7, and often stay silent until after lock-in.
-
Inference-Time Budget Control for LLM Search Agents
A VOI-based controller for dual inference budgets improves multi-hop QA performance by prioritizing search actions and selectively finalizing answers.
-
When Agents Look the Same: Quantifying Distillation-Induced Similarity in Tool-Use Behaviors
New RPS and AGS metrics show within-family distilled LLM agents have 5.9 pp higher tool-use graph similarity than cross-family pairs, with some models exceeding their teachers.
-
Profile-Then-Reason: Bounded Semantic Complexity for Tool-Augmented Language Agents
PTR framework profiles a workflow upfront then executes it deterministically with bounded verification and repair, limiting LM calls to 2-3 while outperforming ReAct in 16 of 24 tested configurations.
-
When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
Introduces EPC-AW to mitigate epistemic miscalibration in LLM multi-agent planning via consistency-based selection and refinement, reporting 9.75% average success improvement.
-
Characterizing Faults in Agentic AI: A Taxonomy of Types, Symptoms, and Root Causes
An empirical study of real-world issues yields a taxonomy of 34 fault types, symptoms, and root causes in agentic AI systems, validated by 145 practitioners.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.