Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 67 references

Shadow of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalized Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a nonlinear-electrodynamics generalization of the Kerr-Newman anti-de Sitter black hole produces shadow angular diameters consistent with the Event Horizon Telescope images of M87* and Sagittarius A*, and that this…

desk verdict Potentially useful shadow analysis whose EHT constraints hinge on an effective-metric issue that the visible text does not address. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13341 v1 pith:AYNQ6E2O submitted 2025-08-18 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

Mohsen Fathi This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-th PACS 04.20.Fy04.20.Jb04.25.-g
keywords blackholeshadownonlinearelectrodynamicsKerr-Newman-AdSspacetimephotonorbitsEventHorizonTelescopeHawkingtemperatureobservables
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a rotating, charged black hole whose electromagnetic field obeys a nonlinear electrodynamics instead of Maxwell's linear theory can reproduce the shadow angular diameters of M87* and Sagittarius A* reported by the Event Horizon Telescope. The spacetime is a generalized Kerr-Newman solution in anti-de Sitter space, described by mass, spin, an effective charge, and a nonlinearity parameter. The shadow is constructed in celestial coordinates for an observer at finite distance, which is required because the AdS background is not asymptotically flat. Matching the predicted angular diameters to the observed ones restricts the spin, effective charge, and nonlinearity parameter, and the paper concludes that this model is a viable extension of the standard Kerr description. The result matters because it shows that departures from classical general relativity can remain consistent with the sharpest horizon-scale images we have.

What carries the argument

The central object is the NLE-KNAdS metric, a stationary, axisymmetric solution of Einstein gravity coupled to a nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian, carrying four parameters: mass, spin, effective charge, and nonlinearity parameter. The argument is carried by the null geodesic flow of this spacetime: the photon region is located where circular photon orbits exist, the critical impact parameters define the shadow edge, and the shadow is projected onto the sky of a finite-distance observer through celestial coordinates, an essential step because the AdS boundary is not flat. Shadow observables such as radius, distortion, area, and oblateness are then compared with the observed angular diameters, and the energy-emission rate is computed from the shadow radius together with the Hawking temperature.

What would settle it

Compute the effective metric that governs photon propagation for the specific nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian used in the paper, trace light rays through that effective metric for the same black hole parameters, and compare the resulting shadow angular diameters with the paper's predictions and with the EHT measurements; if the effective-metric diameter disagrees with the observed values while the paper's does not, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the shadow of the nonlinear-electrodynamics generalized Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole can be matched to the Event Horizon Telescope angular diameters for both M87* and Sagittarius A*, and that this match is informative rather than automatic. Both the spin and the nonlinearity parameter alter the shadow size and shape, while the effective charge is confined to a narrow allowed range by the observations. The author therefore reads the fit as evidence that the NLE-KNAdS metric is a physically consistent and observationally viable alternative to the Kerr metric for these two black holes. Alongside the shadow geometry, the paper derives the Hawking energy-emission rate from the shadow radius and temperature, finding that rotation and nonlinear electrodynamics modify the evaporation behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The shadow is assumed to be traced by ordinary light-ray paths of the spacetime geometry, but in nonlinear electrodynamics light generally travels on a different effective geometry; if that is true for this model, the computed shadow would not be the actual image.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The current horizon-scale images of M87* and Sgr A* do not by themselves distinguish the Kerr metric from this nonlinear-electrodynamics extension, so the search for deviations must rely on finer shadow features or higher-resolution observations.
  • The EHT angular diameters turn into an upper bound on the effective charge and a correlated allowed region for spin and nonlinearity parameter; sharper future images will shrink that region.
  • Because the shadow's distortion and oblateness respond to the spin, the same fitting procedure offers a way to estimate spin within the NLE model rather than assuming the Kerr relation.
  • The modified Hawking energy-emission rate implies that rotation and nonlinear electrodynamics change the evaporation history of these black holes compared with the Kerr-Newman case.
  • The finite-distance celestial-coordinate construction provides a working method for shadow predictions in other non-asymptotically flat spacetimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the model is to compute photon paths in the effective optical metric that governs light in this nonlinear electrodynamics; if that metric differs from the spacetime metric, the paper's shadow and parameter bounds would need to be recalculated.
  • The same finite-distance shadow formalism can be applied to other nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangians, and the predicted shadow oblateness could then discriminate between competing models.
  • The spin range allowed by the shadow fit can be cross-checked against independent spin estimates for Sgr A* or M87* from jet or outflow methods, providing a test that does not depend on the shadow calculation itself.
  • Because the background is anti-de Sitter, the shadow size depends on the observer's distance; future observations with sufficient resolution could in principle use this dependence to probe the cosmological constant.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the shadow of a rotating, charged, asymptotically AdS black hole in a nonlinear electrodynamics (NLE) generalization of Kerr-Newman, using the celestial-coordinate approach for finite-distance observers. It derives shadow observables (size, distortion, area, oblateness), compares predicted shadow angular diameters with EHT measurements for M87* and Sgr A* to bound the spin, effective charge, and nonlinearity parameter, and computes the energy emission rate. The central claim is that the model is a physically consistent and observationally viable extension of the standard Kerr paradigm.

Significance. If correct, the paper would extend the black-hole-shadow program to a nontrivial NLE setting and would provide observational constraints on the nonlinearity parameter. The analytical treatment of the shadow and the use of a known exact NLE solution are appropriate, and the EHT comparison gives falsifiable predictions. However, the significance is conditional on the photon-propagation issue described in the major comments; the paper's strongest conclusion is not supported unless the effective-metric problem is resolved. The manuscript is otherwise competently structured and covers the standard shadow observables and energy emission rate.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.A] The photon orbits are computed as null geodesics of the background NLE-KNAdS metric, but in nonlinear electrodynamics light propagation is generically governed by an effective metric G^{\mu\nu} = L_F g^{\mu\nu} - 4 L_{FF} F^{\mu\alpha} F^{\nu}_{\ \alpha}, which differs from the spacetime metric g_{\mu\nu}. Unless the chosen NLE Lagrangian has L_{FF}=0 (Maxwell) or the effective metric is conformally equivalent to g_{\mu\nu}, the shadow derived in Section III.B is the shadow of hypothetical null test particles rather than of actual photons. Since the EHT constraints in Section IV.C rest on associating the computed shadow with the observed M87* and Sgr A* images, this identification is load-bearing for the paper's central claim. Please justify that the photon trajectories coincide with background null geodesics for the specific Lagrangian used, or repeat the shadow calculation with the appropriate effective metric.
  2. [Section IV.C] The observational constraints quote bounds on spin, effective charge, and nonlinearity parameter from EHT angular diameters, but the EHT observable is the bright ring diameter, not the shadow diameter, and the conversion involves calibration and astrophysical modeling. Please specify precisely which reported quantities (e.g., the ring diameters in Refs. [14,15] and their error bars) are used, and state whether systematic uncertainties are included in the parameter bounds. Without this information, the quoted constraint regions may be overinterpreted.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III.A] The text refers to 'orbits of constant radius' but does not specify whether the analysis is restricted to the equatorial plane or applies to off-equatorial spherical photon orbits; please clarify this assumption.
  2. [Section III.B] The abstract states that the shadow is constructed for observers at finite distances; the celestial-coordinate approach should define how the observer position is fixed and how the asymptotic limit is recovered for the non-asymptotically flat spacetime, or else readers cannot assess the validity of the finite-distance correction.
  3. [Section II.A] The explicit NLE Lagrangian L(F) is not shown in the visible portion of the manuscript; including it, together with a verification that the line element solves the Einstein-NLE equations, would make the derivation self-contained and checkable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the shadow is derived from the metric and the EHT angular diameters are external constraints; the author's earlier orbit paper is cited only as a method reference and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: take the NLE-KNAdS metric (from the external solution of Galindo-Uriarte and Breton, Ref. [13]), compute null-geodesic critical impact parameters for circular photon orbits (Sec. III.A), construct the shadow in celestial coordinates (Sec. III.B), compute shape observables (Sec. IV), and then compare the predicted shadow angular diameter with the EHT measurements for M87* and Sgr A* (Sec. IV.C). The EHT values are external data; the model parameters (spin, effective charge, nonlinearity parameter) are free and are bounded by requiring consistency with those data. This is parameter estimation, not a prediction forced by construction: the abstract explicitly says the angular diameters 'allow us to bound the parameter space,' not that the model predicts the diameters from a prior fit. No equation in the available text defines a model parameter in terms of a target shadow diameter and then re-derives that same diameter, so the self-definitional and fitted-input-called-prediction patterns do not apply. The only self-citation is Ref. [40] (Fathi, Olivares and Villanueva) on spherical photon orbits in other rotating spacetimes; it is used as a methodological reference for orbit analysis and provides no uniqueness theorem or existence condition that forces the shadow. The concern about NLE effective photon metrics is a physical-correctness issue (whether background null geodesics represent actual light rays), not a circularity issue, because the output would still not be an input in the argument. Hence no circular step is identifiable from the available text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main free parameters are the three model parameters constrained by EHT data. The axioms are the background metric from prior work, the geodesic light-ray assumption (which is questionable in NLE), and the identification of the EHT ring with the shadow.

free parameters (3)
  • spin parameter a/M
    The spin is a model parameter constrained by EHT angular diameter data, according to the abstract.
  • effective charge q (or Q)
    The effective charge is a model parameter constrained by EHT data; abstract says both spin and nonlinearity play key roles in restricting the effective charge.
  • nonlinearity parameter (e.g., beta)
    The nonlinearity parameter is a model parameter constrained by EHT observations; abstract states it shapes the shadow.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The NLE-KNAdS metric from refs [11-13] is an exact solution of Einstein-nonlinear-electrodynamics equations.
    The shadow computations use this metric as the fixed background, so the solution's correctness is assumed from prior literature.
  • ad hoc to paper Photon orbits are described by null geodesics of the background metric.
    This is the standard shadow calculation, but for nonlinear electrodynamics the photon effective metric may differ; the paper does not justify the geodesic treatment.
  • domain assumption The observed EHT ring angular diameter corresponds to the theoretical shadow angular diameter.
    The constraint on parameters uses the EHT angular diameters for M87* and Sgr A*, which are often interpreted as shadow sizes, though the emission ring may differ from the photon shadow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shadow of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalized Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AYNQ6E2O

@misc{pith2026250813341,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shadow of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalized Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AYNQ6E2O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13341}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the shadow properties of the Kerr-Newman-Anti-de Sitter black hole coupled to a nonlinear electrodynamics. We construct the shadow by employing the celestial coordinate approach for observers located at finite distances, accounting for the non-asymptotically flat nature of the spacetime. The size, distortion, area, and oblateness of the shadow are analyzed in terms of the black hole parameters, including the spin, effective charge, and nonlinearity parameter. We further explore observational constraints using the Event Horizon Telescope results for M87* and Sgr~A*. The angular diameters inferred from the observed images allow us to bound the parameter space of the model, showing that both spin and nonlinearity play key roles in shaping the shadow and in restricting the effective charge. Additionally, we examine the energy emission rate derived from the shadow radius and Hawking temperature, highlighting the influence of rotation and nonlinear electrodynamics on black hole evaporation. Our results demonstrate that the black hole model provides a physically consistent and observationally viable extension of the standard Kerr paradigm, with potential implications for near-horizon quantum processes and tests of gravity beyond general relativity.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Stationary Rotating Black Hole Exact Solution within Einstein–Nonlinear Electrodynamics,

    A. A. Garcia-Diaz, “Stationary Rotating Black Hole Exact Solution within Einstein–Nonlinear Electrodynamics,” arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2112.06302, Dec. 2021

    arXiv 2021

  2. [12]

    AdS–dS stationary rotating black hole exact solution within Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics,

    A. A. Garc ´ıa-D´ıaz, “AdS–dS stationary rotating black hole exact solution within Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics,”Annals of Physics, vol. 441, p. 168880, June 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [13]

    Nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Kerr-Newman solution with a cosmological con- stant,

    O. Galindo-Uriarte and N. Breton, “Nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Kerr-Newman solution with a cosmological con- stant,” Physical Review D, vol. 110, p. 064021, Sept. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [14]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V . Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V . Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 875, no. 1, p. L5, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [15]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 930, no. 2, p. L12, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [16]

    Analysis of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Reissner–Nordstr¨om black hole,

    A. Ara ´ujo Filho, “Analysis of a nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Reissner–Nordstr¨om black hole,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 85, p. 454, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [17]

    Remarks on a nonlinear electromagnetic extension in AdS Reissner-Nordstr¨om spacetime,

    A. Ara ´ujo Filho, “Remarks on a nonlinear electromagnetic extension in AdS Reissner-Nordstr¨om spacetime,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2025, p. 072, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [18]

    Extraction of Rotational Energy from a Black Hole,

    R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, “Extraction of Rotational Energy from a Black Hole,” Nature Physical Science, vol. 229, pp. 177–179, Feb. 1971

    work page 1971

Show all 67 references
  1. [19]

    Observers in Kerr spacetimes: the ergoregion on the equatorial plane,

    D. Pugliese and H. Quevedo, “Observers in Kerr spacetimes: the ergoregion on the equatorial plane,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 78, p. 69, Jan. 2018

    2018

  2. [20]

    Global structure of the kerr family of gravitational fields,

    B. Carter, “Global structure of the kerr family of gravitational fields,” Physical Review, vol. 174, pp. 1559–1571, Oct 1968

    1968

  3. [21]

    Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford classic texts in the physical sciences, Oxford University Press, 2002

    2002

  4. [22]

    Equatorial circular orbits in Kerr–Newman–de Sitter spacetimes,

    P. Slan ´y and Z. Stuchl´ık, “Equatorial circular orbits in Kerr–Newman–de Sitter spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 587, 2020

    2020

  5. [23]

    Analytical solution of the geodesic equation in kerr-(anti-) de sitter space-times,

    E. Hackmann, C. L ¨ammerzahl, V . Kagramanova, and J. Kunz, “Analytical solution of the geodesic equation in kerr-(anti-) de sitter space-times,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 044020, 2010

    2010

  6. [24]

    Light escape cones in local reference frames of kerr–de sitter black hole spacetimes and related black hole shadows,

    Z. Stuchl ´ık, D. Charbul´ak, and J. Schee, “Light escape cones in local reference frames of kerr–de sitter black hole spacetimes and related black hole shadows,” Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 78, 2018

    2018

  7. [25]

    Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,

    B. Carter, “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,” Phys. Rev., vol. 174, pp. 1559–1571, 1968

    1968

  8. [26]

    Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation,

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 178, pp. 347–370, Dec. 1972

    1972

  9. [27]

    Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric,

    J. Bardeen, “Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric,” in Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics: Black Holes , pp. 215–240, 1973

    1973

  10. [28]

    Polar orbits in the Kerr space-time,

    E. Stoghianidis and D. Tsoubelis, “Polar orbits in the Kerr space-time,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 19, pp. 1235–1249, Dec. 1987

    1987

  11. [29]

    Using the Uncharged Kerr Black Hole as a Gravitational Mirror,

    C. R. Cramer, “Using the Uncharged Kerr Black Hole as a Gravitational Mirror,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 29, pp. 445– 454, Apr. 1997

    1997

  12. [30]

    Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole,

    E. Teo, “Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 35, pp. 1909–1926, Nov. 2003

    1909

  13. [31]

    PHOTON RINGS AROUND KERR AND KERR-LIKE BLACK HOLES,

    T. Johannsen, “PHOTON RINGS AROUND KERR AND KERR-LIKE BLACK HOLES,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 777, p. 170, oct 2013

    2013

  14. [32]

    Photon regions and shadows of kerr-newman-nut black holes with a cosmological constant,

    A. Grenzebach, V . Perlick, and C. L ¨ammerzahl, “Photon regions and shadows of kerr-newman-nut black holes with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev., vol. D89, p. 124004, Jun 2014

    2014

  15. [33]

    Light propagation in a plasma on kerr spacetime: Separation of the hamilton-jacobi equation and calculation of the shadow,

    V . Perlick and O. Y . Tsupko, “Light propagation in a plasma on kerr spacetime: Separation of the hamilton-jacobi equation and calculation of the shadow,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 95, p. 104003, May 2017

    2017

  16. [34]

    Spherical photon orbits in the field of Kerr naked singularities,

    D. Charbul ´ak and Z. Stuchl´ık, “Spherical photon orbits in the field of Kerr naked singularities,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 78, p. 879, Nov. 2018

    2018

  17. [35]

    Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring,

    M. D. Johnson, A. Lupsasca, A. Strominger, G. N. Wong, S. Hadar, D. Kapec, R. Narayan, A. Chael, C. F. Gammie, P. Galison, D. C. M. Palumbo, S. S. Doeleman, L. Blackburn, M. Wielgus, D. W. Pesce, J. R. Farah, and J. M. Moran, “Universal interferometric signatures of a black ho...

    2020

  18. [36]

    Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring,

    E. Himwich, M. D. Johnson, A. Lupsasca, and A. Strominger, “Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, p. 084020, Apr 2020

    2020

  19. [37]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in the kerr geometry,

    Z. Gelles, E. Himwich, M. D. Johnson, and D. C. M. Palumbo, “Polarized image of equatorial emission in the kerr geometry,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, p. 044060, Aug 2021

    2021

  20. [38]

    Testing gravity with black hole shadow subrings,

    D. Ayzenberg, “Testing gravity with black hole shadow subrings,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 39, p. 105009, may 2022

    2022

  21. [39]

    Study of circular geodesics and shadow of rotating charged black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter immersed in plasma,

    A. Das, A. Saha, and S. Gangopadhyay, “Study of circular geodesics and shadow of rotating charged black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter immersed in plasma,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 39, p. 075005, mar 2022

    2022

  22. [40]

    Spherical photon orbits around a rotating black hole with quintessence and cloud of strings,

    M. Fathi, M. Olivares, and J. R. Villanueva, “Spherical photon orbits around a rotating black hole with quintessence and cloud of strings,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 138, p. 7, Jan. 2023

    2023

  23. [41]

    Investigating effects of dark matter on photon orbits and black hole shadows,

    A. Anjum, M. Afrin, and S. G. Ghosh, “Investigating effects of dark matter on photon orbits and black hole shadows,” Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 40, p. 101195, 2023

    2023

  24. [42]

    Radii of spherical photon orbits around kerr-newman black holes,

    Y .-X. Chen, J.-H. Huang, and H. Jiang, “Radii of spherical photon orbits around kerr-newman black holes,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 107, p. 044066, Feb 2023

    2023

  25. [43]

    Spherical orbits around Kerr-Newman and regular black holes,

    L. Andaru, A. Alam, B. Jayawiguna, and H. Ramadhan, “Spherical orbits around Kerr-Newman and regular black holes,” preprint, In Review, Oct. 2023

    2023

  26. [44]

    Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings,

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, “Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, p. 024018, Jul 2019. 22

    2019

  27. [45]

    Analytical study of higher-order ring images of the accretion disk around a black hole,

    G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Y . Tsupko, “Analytical study of higher-order ring images of the accretion disk around a black hole,” Physical Review D, vol. 105, p. 064040, Mar. 2022

    2022

  28. [46]

    Shape of higher-order images of equatorial emission rings around a Schwarzschild black hole: Analytical description with polar curves,

    O. Y . Tsupko, “Shape of higher-order images of equatorial emission rings around a Schwarzschild black hole: Analytical description with polar curves,” Physical Review D, vol. 106, p. 064033, Sept. 2022

    2022

  29. [47]

    The geometry of photon surfaces,

    C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, “The geometry of photon surfaces,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 42, pp. 818–838, Feb. 2001

    2001

  30. [48]

    Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing,

    K. S. Virbhadra, “Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, p. 083004, Apr. 2009

    2009

  31. [49]

    Compactness of supermassive dark objects at galactic centers,

    K. Virbhadra, “Compactness of supermassive dark objects at galactic centers,” Canadian Journal of Physics, pp. cjp–2023–0313, June 2024

    2023

  32. [50]

    Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation,

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation,” Astrophys. J, vol. 178, pp. 347–370, Dec. 1972

    1972

  33. [51]

    Strong-field gravitational lensing by a Kerr black hole,

    S. E. V ´azquez and E. P. Esteban, “Strong-field gravitational lensing by a Kerr black hole,”Nuovo Cimento B Serie, vol. 119, p. 489, May 2004

    2004

  34. [52]

    Grenzebach, The Shadow of Black Holes, pp

    A. Grenzebach, The Shadow of Black Holes, pp. 55–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016

    2016

  35. [53]

    Measurement of the Kerr Spin Parameter by Observation of a Compact Object’s Shadow,

    K. Hioki and K.-i. Maeda, “Measurement of the Kerr Spin Parameter by Observation of a Compact Object’s Shadow,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, p. 024042, 2009

    2009

  36. [54]

    Constraints on Barrow Entropy from M87* and S2 Star Observations,

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-A ¨ınou, M. Jamil, and E. N. Saridakis, “Constraints on Barrow Entropy from M87* and S2 Star Observations,” Universe, vol. 8, p. 102, Feb. 2022

    2022

  37. [55]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and grey- body factors,

    M. Okyay and A. ¨Ovg¨un, “Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and grey- body factors,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2022, p. 009, Jan. 2022

    2022

  38. [56]

    Parameter estimation of hairy Kerr black holes from its shadow and constraints from M87*,

    M. Afrin, R. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, “Parameter estimation of hairy Kerr black holes from its shadow and constraints from M87*,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 504, pp. 5927–5940, May 2021

    2021

  39. [57]

    Superradiant evolution of the shadow and photon ring of Sgr A *,

    Y . Chen, R. Roy, S. Vagnozzi, and L. Visinelli, “Superradiant evolution of the shadow and photon ring of Sgr A *,” Physical Review D, vol. 106, p. 043021, Aug. 2022

    2022

  40. [58]

    Tests of Loop Quantum Gravity from the Event Horizon Telescope Results of Sgr A*,

    M. Afrin, S. Vagnozzi, and S. G. Ghosh, “Tests of Loop Quantum Gravity from the Event Horizon Telescope Results of Sgr A*,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 944, p. 149, Feb. 2023

    2023

  41. [59]

    Shadow of the Kerr-like black hole,

    F. Sarikulov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and B. Ahmedov, “Shadow of the Kerr-like black hole,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 82, p. 771, Sept. 2022

    2022

  42. [60]

    Shadow of rotating and twisting charged black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence,

    M. Zahid, J. Rayimbaev, F. Sarikulov, S. U. Khan, and J. Ren, “Shadow of rotating and twisting charged black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 83, p. 855, Sept. 2023

    2023

  43. [61]

    4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole in Power-Yang-Mills field: a shadow study,

    M. Zubair, M. A. Raza, F. Sarikulov, and J. Rayimbaev, “4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole in Power-Yang-Mills field: a shadow study,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2023, p. 058, Oct. 2023

    2023

  44. [62]

    A coordinate-independent characterization of a black hole shadow,

    A. A. Abdujabbarov, L. Rezzolla, and B. J. Ahmedov, “A coordinate-independent characterization of a black hole shadow,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 454, pp. 2423–2435, Dec. 2015

    2015

  45. [63]

    Black Hole Parameter Estimation from Its Shadow,

    R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, “Black Hole Parameter Estimation from Its Shadow,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 892, p. 78, Apr. 2020

    2020

  46. [64]

    Analytical calculation of black hole spin using deformation of the shadow,

    O. Y . Tsupko, “Analytical calculation of black hole spin using deformation of the shadow,”Phys. Rev., vol. D95, p. 104058, May 2017

    2017

  47. [65]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 875, p. L1, 2019

    2019

  48. [66]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 875, no. 1, p. L6, 2019

    2019

  49. [67]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 930, no. 2, p. L17, 2022

    2022

  50. [68]

    Measurement of the spin of the M87 black hole from its observed twisted light,

    F. Tamburini, B. Thid´e, and M. Della Valle, “Measurement of the spin of the M87 black hole from its observed twisted light,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 492, no. 1, pp. L22–L27, 2020

    2020

  51. [69]

    New black hole spin values for Sagittarius A* obtained with the outflow method,

    R. A. Daly, M. Donahue, C. P. O’Dea, B. Sebastian, D. Haggard, and A. Lu, “New black hole spin values for Sagittarius A* obtained with the outflow method,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 527, no. 1, pp. 428–436, 2023

    2023

  52. [70]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV . Variability, Morphology, and Black Hole Mass,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV . Variability, Morphology, and Black Hole Mass,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 930, no. 2, p. L15, 2022

    2022

  53. [71]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature, vol. 248, pp. 30–31, 1974

    1974

  54. [72]

    Deflection angle and shadow behaviors of quintessential black holes in arbitrary dimensions,

    A. Belhaj, M. Benali, A. El Balali, H. El Moumni, and S.-E. Ennadifi, “Deflection angle and shadow behaviors of quintessential black holes in arbitrary dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 37, p. 215004, Nov. 2020

    2020

  55. [73]

    Observing the shadow of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion black hole,

    S.-W. Wei and Y .-X. Liu, “Observing the shadow of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion black hole,”Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics, vol. 2013, pp. 063–063, Nov. 2013

    2013

  56. [74]

    Fine structure of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes,

    Y . D´ecanini, A. Folacci, and B. Raffaelli, “Fine structure of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes,”Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, p. 175021, Sept. 2011

    2011

  57. [75]

    Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe,

    P.-C. Li, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 101, p. 084041, Apr. 2020

    2020

  58. [76]

    Vi`ete, descartes and the cubic equation,

    R. W. D. Nickalls, “Vi`ete, descartes and the cubic equation,” The Mathematical Gazette, vol. 90, no. 518, p. 203–208, 2006

    2006

  59. [77]

    92.34 the cubic equation – a new look at the irreducible case,

    I. Zucker, “92.34 the cubic equation – a new look at the irreducible case,”The Mathematical Gazette, vol. 92, no. 524, pp. 264–268, 2008

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.