Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

SuryaBench: Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Machine Learning in Heliophysics and Space Weather Prediction

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SuryaBench offers the full SDO solar archive at native resolution for machine learning

desk verdict Genuinely useful full-resolution SDO dataset, but the saturation clamp needs validation before the high-fidelity claims are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14107 v1 pith:LSZ73EIM submitted 2025-08-18 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IMcs.AI

Sujit Roy , Dinesha V. Hegde , Johannes Schmude , Amy Lin , Vishal Gaur , Rohit Lal , Kshitiz Mandal , Talwinder Singh
show 17 more authors
Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo Kang Yang Chetraj Pandey Jinsu Hong Berkay Aydin Ryan McGranaghan Spiridon Kasapis Vishal Upendran Shah Bahauddin Daniel da Silva Marcus Freitag Iksha Gurung Nikolai Pogorelov Campbell Watson Manil Maskey Juan Bernabe-Moreno Rahul Ramachandran
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IMcs.AI
keywords SuryaBenchsolarphysicsspaceweatherSDOAIAHMImachinelearningdatasetbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SuryaBench is presented as the largest curated, homogenized machine-learning-ready dataset of NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory, preserving the full 4096×4096 resolution of AIA and HMI images at a steady 12-minute cadence from May 2010 to July 2024. The paper's aim is to remove the preprocessing burden that has kept SDO data out of mainstream ML workflows and to standardize six core heliophysics tasks—flare prediction, active-region segmentation and emergence, coronal field extrapolation, EUV spectra, and solar wind—with baseline results. If this dataset works as claimed, it gives model developers a single, reproducible floor for comparing AI models on space-weather forecasting.

What carries the argument

The homogenization pipeline is the central object: it promotes AIA data from level 1 to level 1.5, removes spacecraft roll, rescales to a common 0.6 arcsec/pixel grid, fixes the solar disk to a radius of 976 arcsec, normalizes exposure times, applies degradation correction clamped at 16,383 DN, re-projects HMI to the same grid, and matches all channels to HMI's 12-minute magnetogram cadence. This pipeline is what makes the simultaneous full-disk, multi-wavelength snapshot at each timestamp possible.

What would settle it

Count the fraction of pixels in the released AIA files that hit the 16,383 DN clamp for each timestamp and channel, then re-run one benchmark (e.g., flare prediction) on a sample after masking or un-clamping those pixels; if the skill scores change materially, the clamping assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SDO's roughly 1.5 TB/day of raw data can be converted into a fixed-grid, AI-ready collection through a pipeline of level-1.5 promotion, exposure normalization, degradation compensation with saturation clamping, disk-radius normalization to 976 arcsec, and HMI re-projection to 0.6 arcsec/pixel, all synchronized to 12-minute timestamps. On top of this core collection, the authors construct six labelled benchmark datasets (DS1–DS6) with specified evaluation protocols and baseline results from ResNet, U-Net, and Transformer architectures. The resulting collection totals about 360 TB, divided into training (2010–2018), validation (2019), and test (2020) subsets with roug

Load-bearing premise

The central claim relies on the assumption that clamping degradation-corrected AIA values at the 16,383 DN saturation limit does not remove information needed for flare and active-region benchmarks, and that the benchmark labels themselves are correct—label generation is only summarized in the main text and deferred to the Supplementary Information.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Full-resolution training inputs (4096×4096) become feasible for self-supervised and foundation models, potentially improving detection of small-scale features such as emerging flux and polarity inversion lines.
  • A uniform 12-minute cadence across a full solar cycle enables consistent temporal models for flare and solar-wind forecasting without per-instrument alignment work.
  • The six benchmark datasets give researchers reference baselines (ResNet, U-Net, SpatioTemporal Transformer) so new models can be compared on identical splits and metrics.
  • The public Hugging Face collection and open code make the preprocessing reproducible, lowering the entry barrier for ML researchers without heliophysics domain expertise.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 6% data loss through the QUALITY-flag filter likely concentrates around eclipse seasons and instrument anomalies; training on the remaining timestamps may introduce a subtle temporal bias that could affect flare statistics. This is an inference, not a claim in the paper.
  • Because the dataset fixes the solar disk radius and centralizes the Sun, it should support direct registration across wavelengths without further alignment, which in turn enables multimodal fusion models that combine EUV and magnetogram channels—an extension the paper notes but does not demonstrate.
  • A testable extension would be to compare model skill for flare prediction using the 512×512 SDOML dataset against SuryaBench's 4096×4096 version on the same held-out flares; the paper does not run this comparison, so the resolution benefit remains a hypothesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. SuryaBench introduces a curated, ML-ready dataset from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), covering May 2010 through December 2024. The core dataset provides AIA extreme-ultraviolet/UV images (eight channels) and HMI line-of-sight/vector magnetograms at the native 4096×4096 pixel scale and a homogenized 12-minute cadence. Preprocessing includes roll-angle correction, plate-scale alignment, exposure normalization, degradation compensation, and fixed solar-disk-radius rescaling. Six auxiliary benchmark datasets target active-region segmentation, active-region emergence forecasting, coronal magnetic-field extrapolation, solar flare prediction, solar EUV spectra prediction, and solar wind speed estimation; baseline model results are reported for several tasks. The manuscript claims that SuryaBench is the largest curated and homogenized SDO dataset to date and is designed to support machine-learning benchmarking, self-supervised learning, and operational space-weather workflows.

Significance. If the data-quality claims hold, SuryaBench would be a valuable community resource: it avoids the spatial-resolution loss of the existing 512×512 SDO ML dataset, covers more than a solar cycle at a consistent 12-minute cadence, and packages six concrete benchmark tasks with public code and baselines. The use of standard tools (SunPy/aiapy), public JSOC calibration tables, explicit QUALITY-flag filtering, and a clear train/validation/test chronology are strengths. However, the paper's central 'high-fidelity' claim is not yet fully established because the degradation-corrected AIA images are clamped at the 16,383 DN saturation limit without quantitative validation of the affected pixels. A numerical inconsistency in the reported storage volume and the thin main-text description of label-generation protocols also need attention before the dataset can serve as a trustworthy benchmark resource.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1.1, Fig. 2] The degradation-corrected AIA images are clamped to the 16,383 DN saturation limit. The paper itself states that this 'may lead to issues' but provides no statistics on the fraction of pixels affected, their spatial distribution, or the interaction with the DS1 and DS4 labels. Figure 2 reports only full-disk mean intensities, which are insensitive to upper-tail clamping. Because saturated pixels are expected in active regions and flare kernels—precisely the structures targeted by DS1 and DS4—the central high-fidelity claim is not yet supported. Please quantify saturated-pixel rates per channel and year, compare active-region versus quiet-Sun rates, and assess whether the benchmark labels or baseline results change under an alternative treatment (e.g., retaining pre-clamp values, using log-scaled intensities, or publishing a saturation mask).
  2. [Sec. 3] The reported data volume is internally inconsistent. With ~600 MB per hourly netCDF file and 379,920 training files, the training set is ~228 TB, not the stated ~360 TB; adding the validation and test splits brings the total to roughly 280 TB. Please report exact per-file sizes (including data type and compression), the total size of each split, and the overall collection size. These figures are part of the public dataset record and directly affect usability and storage planning.
  3. [Sec. 2.2 / Supplementary] The construction of the six benchmark labels is only summarized in the main text; the actual protocols (AR/PIL mask generation, flare and emergence event definitions, target windows, solar-wind target alignment, EVE spectral preprocessing, etc.) are deferred to the Supplementary Information. Since the correctness of DS1–DS6 is central to the benchmark package, the main manuscript should either include the label-generation protocols in sufficient detail or clearly point to the exact online documentation. It should also report key validation statistics, such as label distributions, event counts, and class balance, so that users can judge benchmark difficulty and potential label errors.
  4. [Sec. 1 / Abstract] The claim that SuryaBench is 'the largest curated and homogenized dataset to date' is not quantitatively substantiated. The only explicit comparison is to the 512×512 resolution of Galvez et al. (2019). For a dataset paper, please add a comparison table covering spatial resolution, temporal cadence, temporal coverage, number of channels, and total size against existing SDO ML datasets, so that the 'largest' claim can be verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4] Baseline results are reported without error bars, confidence intervals, or the number of independent runs. Please state the number of seeds and the standard deviation across runs; otherwise it is difficult to judge whether the differences between architectures are meaningful.
  2. [Table 1] Please clarify units in the dynamic-range row: AIA values are DN after clamping, while the text also refers to DN/sec after exposure normalization; HMI vector components should specify their coordinate frame (e.g., radial, heliographic).
  3. [Sec. 3] The global '~6% missing data' figure should be disaggregated by year, channel, and instrument. Missing data is rarely uniform over a solar cycle, and users of the 12-minute sequence need to know where gaps concentrate.
  4. [Sec. 2.1.1] The name of the specific SunPy/aiapy function used for the level-1.5 promotion is garbled in the typeset text. Please cite the exact function and version so that the preprocessing is reproducible.
  5. [Table 2] DS3 has H=4,186 rather than 4,096, and DS6 has 1,343 output channels. These are unusual dimensions; a one-sentence explanation in the main text would help users understand the data layout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain; minor self-citations in baselines and label methods are not load-bearing.

full rationale

SuryaBench is a data descriptor rather than a derivation paper. The central claim—largest curated, homogenized SDO dataset preserving full 4096×4096 native resolution with a consistent 12-minute cadence—is established by the construction of the dataset itself and by comparison with the external 512×512 dataset of Galvez et al. (cited in Sec. 1). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; the six benchmark datasets (DS1–DS6) are built from externally sourced labels such as GOES flare reports, HMI magnetograms, EVE spectra, and ACE solar wind measurements. The baseline models (ResNet, U-Net, AlexNet, etc.) are evaluated, not derived from the dataset, so there is no fit-to-prediction circularity. Self-citations do occur: Sec. 4 uses 'the modified long-short Spectral Transformer [4]' from the authors' own prior work as a baseline architecture, and several label-generation methods cite co-authored papers (e.g., Cai et al. [28] for PIL detection, Kasapis et al. [29] for AR emergence, Pandey et al. [48,50] for flare forecasting). However, these citations are not load-bearing for the dataset's validity or for its headline claims; they are implementation choices or baseline references. The acknowledged saturation clamping in Sec. 2.1.1 is a genuine preprocessing limitation with potential impact on flare/AR tasks, but it is not a circular step: clamping is a post-processing operation independent of the benchmark labels and does not make the dataset's output equivalent to its input. Thus, while minor self-references exist, no circular reduction of the central claim is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a data descriptor, so the ledger captures the domain assumptions required for the preprocessing to be valid rather than fitted parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AIA level-1 to level-1.5 promotion via aiapy is correct and sufficient.
    Section 2.1.1 relies on standard SunPy/aiapy routines for roll removal, pixel scaling, and centering.
  • domain assumption HMI 0.5 arcsec data can be bilinearly re-projected onto the AIA 0.6 arcsec grid without loss of magnetic information needed for subsequent tasks.
    Section 2.1.2 uses bilinear interpolation via SunPy for HMI re-projection.
  • domain assumption AIA QUALITY flag equal to zero reliably indicates data suitable for ML training.
    Section 2.1.3 filters all AIA timestamps based on this criterion without further manual inspection.
  • domain assumption JSOC degradation correction tables are accurate and clamping at the 16,383 DN saturation value is acceptable.
    Section 2.1.1 applies degradation correction and clamps values above the saturation limit.
  • domain assumption The 2-minute temporal search window around HMI timestamps causes negligible misalignment.
    Section 2.1.3 matches AIA data to HMI timestamps within two minutes.
  • domain assumption The labels for the six application benchmark datasets are correctly generated and aligned to the core imagery.
    Section 2.2 describes the datasets but defers label validation details to the Supplementary Information.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SuryaBench: Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Machine Learning in Heliophysics and Space Weather Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LSZ73EIM

@misc{pith2026250814107,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SuryaBench: Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Machine Learning in Heliophysics and Space Weather Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LSZ73EIM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14107}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a high resolution, machine learning-ready heliophysics dataset derived from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), specifically designed to advance machine learning (ML) applications in solar physics and space weather forecasting. The dataset includes processed imagery from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) and Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI), spanning a solar cycle from May 2010 to July 2024. To ensure suitability for ML tasks, the data has been preprocessed, including correction of spacecraft roll angles, orbital adjustments, exposure normalization, and degradation compensation. We also provide auxiliary application benchmark datasets complementing the core SDO dataset. These provide benchmark applications for central heliophysics and space weather tasks such as active region segmentation, active region emergence forecasting, coronal field extrapolation, solar flare prediction, solar EUV spectra prediction, and solar wind speed estimation. By establishing a unified, standardized data collection, this dataset aims to facilitate benchmarking, enhance reproducibility, and accelerate the development of AI-driven models for critical space weather prediction tasks, bridging gaps between solar physics, machine learning, and operational forecasting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author Schrijver , C. J. , author Dobbins , R. , author Murtagh , W. & author Petrinec , S. M. journal title Assessing the impact of space weather on the electric power grid based on insurance claims for industrial electrical equipment . Space Weather volume 12 , pages 487--498 , 10.1002/2014SW001066 ( year 2014 ). 1406.7024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    author Pesnell , W. D. , author Thompson , B. J. & author Chamberlin , P. C. journal title The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) . volume 275 , pages 3--15 , 10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3 ( year 2012 )

    doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3 2012

  3. [3]

    Machine learning in solar physics

    author Asensio Ramos , A. , author Cheung , M. C. M. , author Chifu , I. & author Gafeira , R. journal title Machine learning in solar physics . Living Reviews in Solar Physics volume 20 , pages 4 , 10.1007/s41116-023-00038-x ( year 2023 ). 2306.15308

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    author Roy, S. et al. journal title Ai foundation model for heliophysics: Applications, design, and implementation . arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10841 ( year 2024 )

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    author Galvez, R. et al. journal title A machine-learning data set prepared from the nasa solar dynamics observatory mission . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series volume 242 , pages 7 ( year 2019 )

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    author Poduval, B. et al. journal title Ai-ready data in space science and solar physics: problems, mitigation and action plan . Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences volume 10 , pages 1203598 ( year 2023 )

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & author Green, L

    author van Driel‑Gesztelyi, L. & author Green, L. M. journal title Evolution of active regions . Living Reviews in Solar Physics volume 12 , pages 1 , 10.1007/lrsp-2015-1 ( year 2015 ). note Open Access Review Article

    doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-1 2015

  8. [8]

    author Schrijver, C. J. journal title A characteristic magnetic field pattern associated with all major solar flares . Astrophysical Journal Letters volume 655 , pages L117--L120 , 10.1086/511857 ( year 2007 ). note Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    doi:10.1086/511857 2007

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    & author Takasao, S

    author Toriumi, S. & author Takasao, S. journal title Numerical simulations of flare-productive active regions: -sunspots, sheared polarity inversion lines, energy storage, and predictions . The Astrophysical Journal volume 850 , pages 39 , 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95c2 ( year 2017 )

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    author Wang, J. et al. journal title Solar flare predictive features derived from polarity inversion line masks in active regions using an unsupervised machine learning algorithm . The Astrophysical Journal volume 892 , pages 140 , 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b6c ( year 2020 )

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    author Cicogna, D. et al. journal title Flare-forecasting algorithms based on high-gradient polarity inversion lines in active regions . The Astrophysical Journal volume 915 , pages 38 , 10.3847/1538-4357/abfafb ( year 2021 )

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    author Ji, A. et al. journal title A systematic magnetic polarity inversion line data set from sdo/hmi magnetograms . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series volume 265 , pages 28 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  5. [13]

    , author Dere, K

    author Zhang, J. , author Dere, K. P. , author Howard, R. A. , author Kundu, M. R. & author White, S. M. journal title On the temporal relationship between coronal mass ejections and flares . The Astrophysical Journal volume 559 , pages 452–462 , 10.1086/322405 ( year 2001 )

    2001 doi

  6. [14]

    author Yasyukevich, Y. et al. journal title The 6 september 2017 x-class solar flares and their impacts on the ionosphere, gnss, and hf radio wave propagation . Space Weather volume 16 , pages 1013--1027 ( year 2018 )

    2017

  7. [15]

    author Cranmer, S. R. & author Winebarger, A. R. journal title The properties of the solar corona and its connection to the solar wind . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 57 , pages 157--187 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  8. [16]

    author Oughton , E. J. , author Skelton , A. , author Horne , R. B. , author Thomson , A. W. P. & author Gaunt , C. T. journal title Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather due to failure in electricity transmission infrastructure . Space Weather volume ...

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    author Woods , T. N. et al. journal title Solar EUV Experiment (SEE): Mission overview and first results . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) volume 110 , pages A01312 , 10.1029/2004JA010765 ( year 2005 )

    2005 doi

  10. [18]

    , author Burns , A

    author Qian , L. , author Burns , A. G. , author Chamberlin , P. C. & author Solomon , S. C. journal title Variability of thermosphere and ionosphere responses to solar flares . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) volume 116 , pages A10309 , 10.1029/2011JA016777 ( ...

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    author Goncharenko , L. P. et al. journal title A New Model for Ionospheric Total Electron Content: The Impact of Solar Flux Proxies and Indices . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) volume 126 , pages e28466 , 10.1029/2020JA02846610.1002/essoar.10503730.1 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  12. [20]

    & author Tsurutani , B

    author Buzulukova , N. & author Tsurutani , B. journal title Space Weather: From Solar Origins to Risks and Hazards Evolving in Time . Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences volume 9 , pages 429 , 10.3389/fspas.2022.1017103 ( year 2022 ). 2212.11504

    2022

  13. [21]

    author Lemen , J. R. et al. journal title The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) . volume 275 , pages 17--40 , 10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 ( year 2012 )

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    author Scherrer , P. H. et al. journal title The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) . volume 275 , pages 207--227 , 10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2 ( year 2012 )

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    author Press, W. H. , author Flannery, B. P. , author Teukolsky, S. A. & author Vetterling, W. T. title Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN 77: The Art of Scientific Computing ( publisher Cambridge University Press , year 1992 ), edition 2 edn

    1992

  16. [24]

    journal title The sunpy project: Open source development and status of the version 1.0 core package

    author The SunPy Community et al. journal title The sunpy project: Open source development and status of the version 1.0 core package . The Astrophysical Journal volume 890 , pages 68-- , 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4f7a ( year 2020 )

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    , author Pap, J

    author Turmon, M. , author Pap, J. M. & author Mukhtar, S. journal title Automated recognition of solar active-region properties . Solar Physics volume 260 , pages 347--363 , 10.1007/s11207-009-9440-8 ( year 2010 ). note Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Delouille, V

    author Verbeeck, C. , author Delouille, V. , author Mampaey, B. & author De Visscher, R. journal title The spoca-suite: Software for extraction, characterization, and tracking of active regions and coronal holes on euv images . Astronomy & Astrophysics volume 561 , pages A29 ,...

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    & author Aranda, M

    author Caballero, C. & author Aranda, M. C. journal title A comparative study of clustering methods for active region detection in solar euv images . Solar Physics volume 283 , pages 691–717 , 10.1007/s11207-013-0239-2 ( year 2013 )

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    , author Aydin, B

    author Cai, X. , author Aydin, B. , author Ji, A. , author Georgoulis, M. K. & author Angryk, R. title A framework for detecting polarity inversion lines from longitudinal magnetograms . In booktitle 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) , pages 4175--4183 ...

    2020

  21. [29]

    , author Kitiashvili, I

    author Kasapis, S. , author Kitiashvili, I. N. , author Kosovichev, A. G. , author Stefan, J. T. & author Apte, B. journal title Predicting the emergence of solar active regions using machine learning . Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union volume 19 , pages 311-...

    2023

  22. [30]

    author Arge, C. N. et al. title Air force data assimilative photospheric flux transport (adapt) model . In booktitle AIP conference proceedings , vol. volume 1216 , pages 343--346 ( organization American Institute of Physics , year 2010 )

    2010

  23. [31]

    author Arge, C. N. et al. title Improving data drivers for coronal and solar wind models . In booktitle 5th international conference of numerical modeling of space plasma flows (astronum 2010) , vol. volume 444 , pages 99 ( year 2011 )

    2010

  24. [32]

    author Arge, C. N. et al. title Modeling the corona and solar wind using adapt maps that include far-side observations . In booktitle AIP conference proceedings , vol. volume 1539 , pages 11--14 ( organization American Institute of Physics , year 2013 )

    2013

  25. [33]

    author Hickmann, K. S. , author Godinez, H. C. , author Henney, C. J. & author Arge, C. N. journal title Data assimilation in the adapt photospheric flux transport model . Solar Physics volume 290 , pages 1105--1118 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  26. [34]

    & author Harvey, J

    author Worden, J. & author Harvey, J. journal title An evolving synoptic magnetic flux map and implications for the distribution of photospheric magnetic flux . Solar Physics volume 195 , pages 247--268 ( year 2000 )

    2000

  27. [35]

    & author Pizzo, V

    author Arge, C. & author Pizzo, V. journal title Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics volume 105 , pages 10465--10479 ( year 2000 )

    2000

  28. [36]

    author Arge, C. N. , author Odstrcil, D. , author Pizzo, V. J. & author Mayer, L. R. title Improved method for specifying solar wind speed near the sun . In booktitle AIP conference proceedings , vol. volume 679 , pages 190--193 ( organization American Institute of Physics , y...

    2003

  29. [37]

    , author Hughes, W

    author McGregor, S. , author Hughes, W. , author Arge, C. & author Owens, M. journal title Analysis of the magnetic field discontinuity at the potential field source surface and schatten current sheet interface in the wang--sheeley--arge model . Journal of Geophysical Research...

    2008

  30. [38]

    author Schatten, K. H. , author Wilcox, J. M. & author Ness, N. F. journal title A model of interplanetary and coronal magnetic fields . Solar Physics volume 6 , pages 442--455 ( year 1969 )

    1969

  31. [39]

    & author Sheeley Jr, N

    author Wang, Y.-M. & author Sheeley Jr, N. journal title On potential field models of the solar corona . Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 392, no. 1, June 10, 1992, p. 310-319. Research supported by US Navy. volume 392 , pages 310--319 ( year 1992 )

    1992

  32. [40]

    author Fletcher, L. et al. journal title An observational overview of solar flares . Space science reviews volume 159 , pages 19--106 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  33. [41]

    author Gloeckler, G. M. title Ace solar wind ion composition spectrometer (swics) solar wind plasma elemental and isotopic density, speed, thermal speed, charge state, and ratio parameters, level 2 (l2), 1 h data ( year 2023 )

    2023

  34. [42]

    author Woods , T. N. et al. journal title Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO): Overview of Science Objectives, Instrument Design, Data Products, and Model Developments . volume 275 , pages 115--143 , 10.1007/s11207-009-9487-...

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    & author Eparvier , F

    author Woodraska , D. & author Eparvier , F. G. title SDO/EVE Level 2B Version 8 Data Product Documentation . howpublished LASP / University of Colorado Boulder Technical Document ( year 2024 ). note Available at https://lasp.colorado.edu/eve/data_access/eve_data/products/leve...

    2024

  36. [44]

    author Chamberlin , P. C. , author Woods , T. N. , author Eparvier , F. G. & author Jones , A. R. title Next generation x-ray sensor (XRS) for the NOAA GOES-R satellite series . In editor Fineschi , S. & editor Fennelly , J. A. (eds.) booktitle Solar Physics and Space Weather ...

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    , author Sutskever, I

    author Krizhevsky, A. , author Sutskever, I. & author Hinton, G. E. journal title Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks . Advances in neural information processing systems volume 25 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  38. [46]

    author Howard, A. G. journal title Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications . arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 ( year 2017 )

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    , author Zhang, X

    author He, K. , author Zhang, X. , author Ren, S. & author Sun, J. title Deep residual learning for image recognition . In booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 770--778 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  40. [48]

    , author Adeyeha, T

    author Pandey, C. , author Adeyeha, T. , author Hong, J. , author Angryk, R. A. & author Aydin, B. title Advancing Solar Flare Prediction Using Deep Learning with Active Region Patches , pages 50–65 ( publisher Springer Nature Switzerland , year 2024 )

    2024

  41. [49]

    author Owens, M. J. , author Challen, R. , author Methven, J. , author Henley, E. & author Jackson, D. journal title A 27 day persistence model of near-earth solar wind conditions: A long lead-time forecast and a benchmark for dynamical models . Space Weather volume 11 , pages...

    2013

  42. [50]

    , author Angryk, R

    author Pandey, C. , author Angryk, R. A. & author Aydin, B. title Solar flare forecasting with deep neural networks using compressed full-disk hmi magnetograms . In booktitle 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) , pages 1725–1730 , 10.1109/bigdata52589.202...

    2021

  43. [51]

    journal title Solar wind sources and their variations over the solar cycle

    author Schwenn, R. journal title Solar wind sources and their variations over the solar cycle . Solar dynamics and its effects on the heliosphere and Earth pages 51--76 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  44. [52]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block ...

  45. [53]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.