Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

This paper proves that every set of incompatible measurements—even those that look local in ordinary Bell tests—generates nonlocality when the measurement inputs are quantum, and that the extractable nonlocality is capped by the measurement

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Every incompatible measurement set, including Bell-local ones, can generate nonlocality in a quantum-input (Buscemi) scenario, and the extractable amount is capped by the degree of incompatibility.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Clean sufficiency result for Buscemi nonlocality, but the only text I can read is the abstract; the proof is unverifiable in this extraction. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.14421 v1 pith:BV46QE4O submitted 2025-08-20 quant-ph

All incompatible sets of measurements can generate Buscemi nonlocality

Andr\'es F. Ducuara , Patryk Lipka-Bartosik , Cristian E. Susa , Paul Skrzypczyk This is my paper
classification quant-ph MSC 81P4081P1581P45 PACS 03.65.Ud03.67.Mn
keywords Bell nonlocalityincompatible measurementsBuscemi nonlocalityquantum inputsjoint measurabilityhidden nonlocalityincompatibility degreegeneralised measurement set
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In standard Bell experiments, incompatible measurements are necessary for nonlocality but not sufficient: some incompatible sets can only produce local correlations. The paper closes this gap by shifting to an extended scenario where the inputs themselves are quantum. It proves that every incompatible set of measurements, including the previously problematic incompatible-local ones, yields nonlocality once quantum inputs are allowed. It also shows that the maximum amount of nonlocality extractable this way is bounded by the degree of incompatibility of the original set, making the bound achievable. A reader should care because this turns incompatibility into a genuine resource with a quantitative limit, and it reveals a form of hidden nonlocality in measurement sets that look entirely classical in ordinary Bell tests.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that incompatibility is not only necessary but also sufficient for nonlocality in the Buscemi scenario, where the measurement inputs are quantum rather than classical. For any set of incompatible measurements, even an incompatible-local set, there exists a shared entangled state and a choice of quantum inputs such that the resulting correlations violate a Bell-type inequality. The set therefore possesses hidden nonlocality that a quantum-input experiment can reveal. Additionally, the maximum amount of nonlocality that can be extracted in this way is bounded above by the degree of incompatibility of the original measurement set, and this bound is achievable. The p

What carries the argument

The generalised set of measurements: a construction that packages an original measurement set together with the quantum input states into a single measurement object. It carries the argument because it lets the authors translate a quantum-input Bell experiment into an ordinary joint-measurability problem. The incompatibility of the generalised set is shown to be equivalent to the nonlocality of the original scenario, and the degree of incompatibility of the generalised set supplies the achievable upper bound on extractable nonlocality.

Load-bearing premise

The generalised set of measurements faithfully represents the quantum-input scenario: it must preserve exactly which original measurement sets are incompatible and which correlations are nonlocal, so that nothing is lost or gained in the translation.

What would settle it

Take a known incompatible-local measurement set, construct its generalised set, and compute both its degree of incompatibility and the maximum Buscemi violation via a semidefinite search. If any such set has a jointly measurable generalised version, or if its violation exceeds the claimed incompatibility bound, the paper's central claim and its upper bound both fail.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Incompatibility is sufficient as well as necessary for nonlocality once quantum inputs are allowed: every incompatible measurement set is a nonlocal resource in the extended scenario.
  • Incompatible-local measurement sets are not useless for quantum information; they carry hidden nonlocality that a quantum-input test can reveal.
  • The extractable nonlocality of a measurement set is quantitatively controlled by its degree of incompatibility, giving a tight resource-theoretic bound.
  • The generalised set of measurements provides a single framework for analysing any scenario with quantum inputs, potentially simplifying future proofs in this area.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the construction is robust, the degree of incompatibility may serve as a full resource monotone for a measurement set's nonlocal power, not merely an upper bound—this would make 'hidden nonlocality' a proper resource theory.
  • The result suggests a device-independent certification scheme: a classical observer who sees only local correlations cannot conclude that a measurement set is compatible, but a quantum-input test can certify incompatibility even for incompatible-local sets.
  • A natural testable extension is to ask whether the bound is saturated for all measurement sets or only some; finding explicit states and quantum inputs that achieve the bound for specific families, such as three-outcome measurements, would sharpen the resource picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove that all sets of incompatible measurements can generate nonlocality in an extended Bell scenario with quantum measurement inputs (Buscemi nonlocality), including previously problematic incompatible-local sets. It further claims that the maximum amount of extractable nonlocality is bounded by a measure of the degree of incompatibility, and it introduces a new construct, the "generalised set of measurements," as a unifying framework for quantum-input scenarios.

Significance. If the proof is correct, this is a substantial advance: it would close the long-standing gap between incompatibility and nonlocality by showing that, once inputs are quantum, incompatibility is not only necessary but sufficient. The explicit upper bound in terms of an incompatibility degree would also provide a quantitative bridge between two central resources in quantum information. The proposed "generalised set of measurements" could be a useful unifying tool for studying quantum-input scenarios. The claim is falsifiable and the result, if established, would likely influence subsequent work on measurement incompatibility and nonlocality.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (as provided)] The supplied manuscript text is heavily corrupted: nearly all equations, definitions, and proof steps are illegible mojibake, and an unrelated arXiv header (arXiv:2508.14422v4 [eess.SY]) is embedded in the text. The central claim is a proof-based theorem, so the derivation is the evidence. As provided, no proof step can be checked: in particular, the definition of the "generalised set of measurements" and the arguments that it preserves both incompatibility and the nonlocality-relevant structure of the quantum-input scenario cannot be audited. This is load-bearing for the main theorem.
  2. [Abstract / upper-bound claim] The abstract states that the maximum extractable nonlocality is "limited by the degree of incompatibility." Without a readable definition of this degree and of the nonlocality quantifier, I cannot verify that the bound is nontrivial, monotone, or achievable. The proof of this bound is not accessible in the supplied text, so the claim that the bound is "achievable" rather than merely formal remains unsubstantiated in the artifact under review.
  3. [General framework] The paper introduces a new object, the "generalised set of measurements," and asserts it provides a unifying way to study any quantum-input scenario. The fidelity of this construction is a premise of the proof: it must preserve the incompatibility of the original set and the correlation structure of the scenario. I cannot check this from the provided text. A clean, legible statement of the definition and its key properties is essential for evaluating the main claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Full text] The text contains an unrelated header "arXiv:2508.14422v4 [eess.SY] 17 May 2026"; this should be removed. The corruption of Greek letters, equation alignment, and section headings makes the manuscript unreadable; a clean PDF or source version is needed.
  2. [References/notation] Because the text is garbled, I cannot verify that the notation is consistent or that all referenced definitions (e.g., Buscemi nonlocality, incompatible-local sets) are standard. Please ensure a clean version for review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identifiable: proof text is illegible, so no specific reduction can be exhibited

full rationale

The supplied full text is almost entirely mojibake, with equations and prose corrupted and a stray header from an unrelated arXiv record (arXiv:2508.14422v4) embedded. Only the abstract is readable. The abstract's central claim—that every incompatible set of measurements generates Buscemi nonlocality via a 'generalised set of measurements', and that extractable nonlocality is bounded by the degree of incompatibility—does not by itself exhibit any definitional collapse or fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The 'degree of incompatibility' could in principle be defined to equal the nonlocality quantifier, making the upper bound vacuous, but the paper's definitions are unreadable, and no specific equation or construction can be quoted to demonstrate such a reduction. Per the hard rules, circularity may only be claimed when the paper can be quoted and the specific reduction exhibited. No such reduction is available. The absence of a detected flaw reflects the absence of readable evidence, not demonstrated correctness; this is an explicit non-finding rather than an endorsement of the proof.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The abstract itself carries the only auditable axioms: the definition of the extended quantum-input scenario, the background facts about incompatibility and Bell locality, and the assumed behavior of the incompatibility measure used in the upper bound. Proof-level axioms (properties of the generalised set of measurements) are not legible in this artifact. No free parameters are present; the paper is purely mathematical. The one invented entity is the generalised set of measurements, a definitional tool with no independent empirical handle.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Quantum states, rather than classical labels, are admissible as measurement inputs, and the locality condition in this scenario is defined relative to shared entanglement (Buscemi scenario).
    The entire claim is stated relative to this scenario; if the local bound were defined differently, 'nonlocality' would change meaning. Location: abstract, 'extended Bell scenario where quantum, instead of classical, measurement inputs are considered'.
  • domain assumption Bell-nonlocal correlations imply incompatibility of the measurement sets (background result used as the departure point).
    The abstract's first sentence states this implication as known; the proof plausibly uses it to define the gap being closed. Location: abstract, first sentence.
  • domain assumption There exist incompatible measurement sets that produce only local correlations in the classical-input scenario ('incompatible-local' sets).
    The abstract asserts this as established background; the new result is that even these sets become nonlocal under quantum inputs. Location: abstract, second sentence.
  • domain assumption The chosen 'degree of incompatibility' is a well-defined measure with the properties needed for the upper bound (monotonicity, normalization, achievability of the bound).
    The upper-bound claim requires a quantitative link between the nonlocality quantifier and the incompatibility quantifier; the definition is not legible in this extraction. Location: abstract, 'maximum amount of nonlocality ... limited by the degree of incompatibility'.
invented entities (1)
  • Generalised set of measurements no independent evidence
    purpose: A unifying mathematical description of scenarios with quantum inputs, used as the vehicle for the proof that all incompatible sets generate Buscemi nonlocality.
    Introduced in the abstract as a new term. It is a definitional tool within the proof: its only support is internal consistency and the theorems it enables, with no independent falsifiable handle. Whether it is genuinely new or a repackaging of known objects (instruments, assemblages, quantum channels) cannot be checked from the garbled body.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All incompatible sets of measurements can generate Buscemi nonlocality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BV46QE4O

@misc{pith2026250814421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All incompatible sets of measurements can generate Buscemi nonlocality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BV46QE4O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14421}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The presence of Bell-nonlocality in the correlations arising from measuring spatially-separated systems guarantees that the sets of measurements used are necessarily incompatible. Not all sets of incompatible measurements can however lead to Bell-nonlocality, as there exist incompatible sets of measurements which can only produce local correlations. In this work we prove that all sets of incompatible measurements are nevertheless able to generate nonlocality in an extended Bell scenario where quantum, instead of classical, measurement inputs are considered. In particular, this holds true for all incompatible-local sets of measurements and, consequently, shows that these sets of measurements posses a form of hidden nonlocality which can be revealed in such a scenario. We furthermore prove that the maximum amount of nonlocality that can be extracted in such a way is limited by the degree of incompatibility of the given set of measurements, thus effectively establishing an achievable upper bound. In order to obtain these results, we introduce a new object which we term a \emph{generalised set of measurements}, which provides a unifying way to study any scenario involving quantum inputs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantifying randomness with measurement incompatibility

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Measurement incompatibility robustness provides a tight, SDP-computable upper bound on an eavesdropper's guessing probability in prepare-and-measure randomness generation.

  2. You Only Evaluate Once: A Tree-based Rerank Method at Meituan

    cs.IR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    YOLOR is a one-stage reranking method for recommenders that removes the candidate-reduction search unit while keeping the exact search unit, using tree-based context extraction and a permutation cache.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Horodecki , author P

    author author R. Horodecki , author P. Horodecki , author M. Horodecki , \ and\ author K. Horodecki ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 865 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  2. [2]

    Brunner , author D

    author author N. Brunner , author D. Cavalcanti , author S. Pironio , author V. Scarani , \ and\ author S. Wehner ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 419 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 2014

  3. [3]

    Scarani ,\ https://books.google.com.co/books?id=39ShDwAAQBAJ title Bell Nonlocality ,\ Oxford Graduate Texts\ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author V. Scarani ,\ https://books.google.com.co/books?id=39ShDwAAQBAJ title Bell Nonlocality ,\ Oxford Graduate Texts\ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  4. [4]

    Cavalcanti \ and\ author P

    author author D. Cavalcanti \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ http://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/80/i=2/a=024001 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 80 ,\ pages 024001 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  5. [5]

    Uola , author A

    author author R. Uola , author A. C. S. \ Costa , author H. C. \ Nguyen , \ and\ author O. G\"uhne ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 015001 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015001 2020

  6. [6]

    Heinosaari , author T

    author author T. Heinosaari , author T. Miyadera , \ and\ author M. Ziman ,\ 10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/123001 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 49 ,\ pages 123001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/123001 2016

  7. [7]

    Duarte \ and\ author B

    author author C. Duarte \ and\ author B. Amaral ,\ 10.1063/1.5018582 journal journal Journal of Mathematical Physics \ volume 59 ,\ pages 062202 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.5018582 2018

  8. [8]

    Modi , author A

    author author K. Modi , author A. Brodutch , author H. Cable , author T. Paterek , \ and\ author V. Vedral ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 1655 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 2012

  9. [9]

    Streltsov , author G

    author author A. Streltsov , author G. Adesso , \ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.041003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 041003 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.041003 2017

  10. [10]

    Adesso , author T

    author author G. Adesso , author T. R. \ Bromley , \ and\ author M. Cianciaruso ,\ http://stacks.iop.org/1751-8121/49/i=47/a=473001 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 49 ,\ pages 473001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  11. [11]

    Gisin ,\ 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90805-i journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 154 ,\ pages 201–202 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    author author N. Gisin ,\ 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90805-i journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 154 ,\ pages 201–202 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90805-i 1991

  12. [12]

    Gisin \ and\ author A

    author author N. Gisin \ and\ author A. Peres ,\ 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90949-m journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 162 ,\ pages 15–17 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90949-m 1992

  13. [13]

    Popescu \ and\ author D

    author author S. Popescu \ and\ author D. Rohrlich ,\ 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90711-t journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 166 ,\ pages 293–297 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90711-t 1992

  14. [14]

    author author R. F. \ Werner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 40 ,\ pages 4277 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 1989

  15. [15]

    Barrett ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042302 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Barrett ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042302 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 65 ,\ pages 042302 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042302 2002

  16. [16]

    Augusiak , author M

    author author R. Augusiak , author M. Demianowicz , \ and\ author A. Ac \' n ,\ http://stacks.iop.org/1751-8121/47/i=42/a=424002 journal journal J. Phys. A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 47 ,\ pages 424002 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  17. [17]

    Hirsch , author M

    author author F. Hirsch , author M. T. \ Quintino , author T. V\'ertesi , author M. F. \ Pusey , \ and\ author N. Brunner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.190402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 190402 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190402 2016

  18. [18]

    Cavalcanti , author L

    author author D. Cavalcanti , author L. Guerini , author R. Rabelo , \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.190401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 190401 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190401 2016

  19. [19]

    Popescu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2619 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Popescu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2619 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 2619 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.2619 1995

  20. [20]

    Gisin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)80001-6 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 210 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    author author N. Gisin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)80001-6 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 210 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)80001-6 1996

  21. [21]

    Linden , author S

    author author N. Linden , author S. Massar , \ and\ author S. Popescu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3279 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 3279 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3279 1998

  22. [22]

    Kent ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2839 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Kent ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2839 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 2839 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2839 1998

  23. [23]

    Kent , author N

    author author A. Kent , author N. Linden , \ and\ author S. Massar ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2656 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 2656 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.2656 1999

  24. [24]

    Verstraete , author J

    author author F. Verstraete , author J. Dehaene , \ and\ author B. DeMoor ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.010101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 64 ,\ pages 010101 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.010101 2001

  25. [25]

    Verstraete \ and\ author M

    author author F. Verstraete \ and\ author M. M. \ Wolf ,\ doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.170401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 170401 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.170401 2002

  26. [26]

    Pramanik , author Y.-W

    author author T. Pramanik , author Y.-W. \ Cho , author S.-W. \ Han , author S.-Y. \ Lee , author Y.-S. \ Kim , \ and\ author S. Moon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.030101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 99 ,\ pages 030101 ( year 2019 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.030101 2019

  27. [27]

    Pramanik , author Y.-W

    author author T. Pramanik , author Y.-W. \ Cho , author S.-W. \ Han , author S.-Y. \ Lee , author S. Moon , \ and\ author Y.-S. \ Kim ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.042311 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 100 ,\ pages 042311 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.042311 2019

  28. [28]

    Hirsch , author M

    author author F. Hirsch , author M. T. \ Quintino , author J. Bowles , \ and\ author N. Brunner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.160402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 160402 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.160402 2013

  29. [29]

    Navascu\'es \ and\ author T

    author author M. Navascu\'es \ and\ author T. V\'ertesi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.060403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 106 ,\ pages 060403 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060403 2011

  30. [30]

    Palazuelos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.190401 journal journal Phys

    author author C. Palazuelos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.190401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 190401 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.190401 2012

  31. [31]

    Cavalcanti , author A

    author author D. Cavalcanti , author A. Ac\' n , author N. Brunner , \ and\ author T. V\'ertesi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042104 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 87 ,\ pages 042104 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042104 2013

  32. [32]

    Cavalcanti , author M

    author author D. Cavalcanti , author M. L. \ Almeida , author V. Scarani , \ and\ author A. Ac \' n ,\ 10.1038/ncomms1193 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 2 ( year 2011 ),\ 10.1038/ncomms1193 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1193 2011

  33. [33]

    Buscemi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.200401 journal journal Phys

    author author F. Buscemi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.200401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 200401 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.200401 2012

  34. [34]

    Bowles , author F

    author author J. Bowles , author F. Hirsch , \ and\ author D. Cavalcanti ,\ 10.22331/q-2021-07-13-499 journal journal Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 499 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-13-499 2021

  35. [35]

    Masanes , author Y.-C

    author author L. Masanes , author Y.-C. \ Liang , \ and\ author A. C. \ Doherty ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.090403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 090403 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.090403 2008

  36. [36]

    \ Liang , author L

    author author Y.-C. \ Liang , author L. Masanes , \ and\ author D. Rosset ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052115 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 86 ,\ pages 052115 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052115 2012

  37. [37]

    author author A. F. \ Ducuara , author J. Madro \ n ero , \ and\ author J. H. \ Reina ,\ 10.11144/javeriana.sc21-2.otao journal journal Universitas Scientiarum \ volume 21 ,\ pages 129 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.11144/javeriana.sc21-2.otao 2016

  38. [38]

    author author M. M. \ Wolf , author D. Perez-Garcia , \ and\ author C. Fernandez ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.230402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 230402 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.230402 2009

  39. [39]

    Ghosh , author C

    author author P. Ghosh , author C. Srivastava , author S. Choudhary , \ and\ author U. Sen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.052208 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 111 ,\ pages 052208 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052208 2025

  40. [40]

    author author M. T. \ Quintino , author J. Bowles , author F. Hirsch , \ and\ author N. Brunner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.052115 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 052115 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.052115 2016

  41. [41]

    Bene \ and\ author T

    author author E. Bene \ and\ author T. V \' e rtesi ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/aa9ca3 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 013021 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa9ca3 2018

  42. [42]

    Hirsch , author M

    author author F. Hirsch , author M. T. \ Quintino , \ and\ author N. Brunner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012129 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 97 ,\ pages 012129 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012129 2018

  43. [43]

    \ Ku , author C.-Y

    author author H.-Y. \ Ku , author C.-Y. \ Hsieh , \ and\ author C. Budroni ,\ @noop title Measurement incompatibility cannot be stochastically distilled , \ ( year 2023 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2308.02252 arXiv:2308.02252 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    \ Ku , author C.-Y

    author author H.-Y. \ Ku , author C.-Y. \ Hsieh , author S.-L. \ Chen , author Y.-N. \ Chen , \ and\ author C. Budroni ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-32466-y journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 13 ( year 2022 ),\ 10.1038/s41467-022-32466-y NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32466-y 2022

  45. [45]

    Pl\'avala , author O

    author author M. Pl\'avala , author O. G\"uhne , \ and\ author M. T. \ Quintino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.200201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 200201 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.200201 2025

  46. [46]

    Cavalcanti , author P

    author author D. Cavalcanti , author P. Skrzypczyk , \ and\ author I. S S upi c \' c ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.110501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 110501 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.110501 2017

  47. [49]

    Horodecki \ and\ author J

    author author M. Horodecki \ and\ author J. Oppenheim ,\ 10.1142/s0217979213450197 journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. B \ volume 27 ,\ pages 1345019 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1142/s0217979213450197 2012

  48. [50]

    Chitambar \ and\ author G

    author author E. Chitambar \ and\ author G. Gour ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 025001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025001 2019

  49. [51]

    Vidal \ and\ author R

    author author G. Vidal \ and\ author R. Tarrach ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.141 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 59 ,\ pages 141 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.59.141 1999

  50. [52]

    Steiner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.054305 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Steiner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.054305 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 67 ,\ pages 054305 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.67.054305 2003

  51. [53]

    Cavalcanti \ and\ author P

    author author D. Cavalcanti \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.052112 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 052112 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.052112 2016

  52. [54]

    Piani \ and\ author J

    author author M. Piani \ and\ author J. Watrous ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.060404 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 060404 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.060404 2015

  53. [55]

    Piani , author M

    author author M. Piani , author M. Cianciaruso , author T. R. \ Bromley , author C. Napoli , author N. Johnston , \ and\ author G. Adesso ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042107 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 042107 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042107 2016

  54. [56]

    Napoli , author T

    author author C. Napoli , author T. R. \ Bromley , author M. Cianciaruso , author M. Piani , author N. Johnston , \ and\ author G. Adesso ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 150502 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.150502 2016

  55. [57]

    Skrzypczyk \ and\ author N

    author author P. Skrzypczyk \ and\ author N. Linden ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.140403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 140403 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.140403 2019

  56. [58]

    Buscemi ,\ 10.1134/S0032946016030017 journal journal Probl

    author author F. Buscemi ,\ 10.1134/S0032946016030017 journal journal Probl. Inf. Transm. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 201 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1134/s0032946016030017 2016

  57. [59]

    Buscemi ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2487-1_6 booktitle Reality and M easurement in A lgebraic Q uantum T heory ,\ editor edited by\ editor M

    author author F. Buscemi ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2487-1_6 booktitle Reality and M easurement in A lgebraic Q uantum T heory ,\ editor edited by\ editor M. Ozawa , editor J. Butterfield , editor H. Halvorson , editor M. R \'e dei , editor Y. Kitajima , \ and\ editor F. Buscemi \ ( publisher Springer Singapore ,\ address Singapore ,\ year ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2487-1_6 2018

  58. [60]

    author author S. M. P. P. A. T. \ Francesco Buscemi , Kodai Kobayashi ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-06-07-1035 journal journal Quantum \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1035 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-06-07-1035 2023

  59. [61]

    S S upi c \' c , author P

    author author I. S S upi c \' c , author P. Skrzypczyk , \ and\ author D. Cavalcanti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032334 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 99 ,\ pages 032334 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032334 2019

  60. [62]

    Lipka-Bartosik \ and\ author P

    author author P. Lipka-Bartosik \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023029 journal journal Phys. Rev. Research \ volume 2 ,\ pages 023029 ( year 2020 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023029 2020

  61. [63]

    Howard \ and\ author E

    author author M. Howard \ and\ author E. Campbell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.090501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 090501 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.090501 2017

  62. [65]

    author author A. F. \ Ducuara , author P. Lipka-Bartosik , \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033374 journal journal Phys. Rev. Research \ volume 2 ,\ pages 033374 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033374 2020

  63. [66]

    Schmid , author D

    author author D. Schmid , author D. Rosset , \ and\ author F. Buscemi ,\ 10.22331/q-2020-04-30-262 journal journal Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 262 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-30-262 2020

  64. [67]

    Wolfe , author D

    author author E. Wolfe , author D. Schmid , author A. B. \ Sainz , author R. Kunjwal , \ and\ author R. W. \ Spekkens ,\ 10.22331/q-2020-06-08-280 journal journal Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 280 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-08-280 2020

  65. [68]

    Rosset , author D

    author author D. Rosset , author D. Schmid , \ and\ author F. Buscemi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.210402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 210402 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.210402 2020

  66. [69]

    Heisenberg ,\ 10.1007/BF01397280 journal journal Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik \ volume 43 ,\ pages 172 ( year 1927 ) NoStop

    author author W. Heisenberg ,\ 10.1007/BF01397280 journal journal Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik \ volume 43 ,\ pages 172 ( year 1927 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/bf01397280 1927

  67. [70]

    Bohr ,\ 10.1038/121580a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 121 ,\ pages 580 ( year 1928 ) NoStop

    author author N. Bohr ,\ 10.1038/121580a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 121 ,\ pages 580 ( year 1928 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/121580a0 1928

  68. [71]

    author author H. P. \ Robertson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.34.163 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 34 ,\ pages 163 ( year 1929 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.34.163 1929

  69. [72]

    Kraus , editor A

    editor K. Kraus , editor A. B\" o hm , editor J. D. \ Dollard , \ and\ editor W. H. \ Wootters ,\ eds.,\ 10.1007/3-540-12732-1 title States, Effects, and Operations Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory \ ( publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 1983 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/3-540-12732-1 1983

  70. [73]

    Busch , author T

    author author P. Busch , author T. Heinonen , \ and\ author P. Lahti ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.05.006 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 452 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.05.006 2007

  71. [74]

    Heinosaari , author D

    author author T. Heinosaari , author D. Reitzner , \ and\ author P. Stano ,\ 10.1007/s10701-008-9256-7 journal journal Foundations of Physics \ volume 38 ,\ pages 1133 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/s10701-008-9256-7 2008

  72. [75]

    Heinosaari , author J

    author author T. Heinosaari , author J. Kiukas , \ and\ author D. Reitzner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022115 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 92 ,\ pages 022115 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022115 2015

  73. [76]

    Heinosaari \ and\ author T

    author author T. Heinosaari \ and\ author T. Miyadera ,\ 10.1088/1751-8121/aa5f6b journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 50 ,\ pages 135302 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5f6b 2017

  74. [77]

    Carmeli , author T

    author author C. Carmeli , author T. Heinosaari , author T. Miyadera , \ and\ author A. Toigo ,\ 10.1063/1.5126496 journal journal Journal of Mathematical Physics \ volume 60 ,\ pages 122202 ( year 2019 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.5126496 2019

  75. [78]

    Carmeli , author T

    author author C. Carmeli , author T. Heinosaari , \ and\ author A. Toigo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012126 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 012126 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.012126 2018

  76. [79]

    Carmeli , author T

    author author C. Carmeli , author T. Heinosaari , \ and\ author A. Toigo ,\ 10.1209/0295-5075/130/50001 journal journal EPL (Europhysics Letters) \ volume 130 ,\ pages 50001 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/130/50001 2020

  77. [80]

    note A faithful resource measure achieves the value zero if and only if the object belongs to the free set NoStop

  78. [81]

    Carmeli , author T

    author author C. Carmeli , author T. Heinosaari , \ and\ author A. Toigo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.130402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 130402 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.130402 2019

  79. [82]

    Uola , author T

    author author R. Uola , author T. Kraft , author J. Shang , author X.-D. \ Yu , \ and\ author O. G\"uhne ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.130404 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 130404 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.130404 2019

  80. [83]

    Skrzypczyk , author I

    author author P. Skrzypczyk , author I. S S upi c \' c , \ and\ author D. Cavalcanti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.130403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 130403 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.130403 2019

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.