pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.14754 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Near-resonant nuclear spin detection with megahertz mechanical resonators

Diego A. Visani , Letizia Catalini , Christian L. Degen , Alexander Eichler , Javier del Pino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nuclear spin detectionmechanical resonatorsmegahertz frequencydynamical backactionfrequency variancemagnetic gradientsingle spin sensingquantum sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluctuating nuclear spin polarization increases resonator frequency variance enough for single-spin detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes detecting nuclear spins by monitoring the frequency variance of a megahertz mechanical resonator coupled to them through a magnetic field gradient. The average polarization produces a mean frequency shift that is too small to measure in small volumes, but random fluctuations in the spin ensemble cause a detectable increase in variance. Analytical and numerical models of dynamical backaction show that this effect can be observed with existing devices, enabling single nuclear spin detection. This opens a path to sensing and potentially controlling individual nuclear spins using mechanical sensors.

Core claim

Dynamical backaction between the sensor and an ensemble of N nuclear spins produces a shift in the sensor's resonance frequency. The mean frequency shift due to the Boltzmann polarization is challenging to measure in nanoscale sample volumes. The fluctuating polarization of the spin ensemble results in a measurable increase of the resonator's frequency variance, which on the basis of analytical and numerical results allows single nuclear spin detection with existing resonator devices.

What carries the argument

Dynamical backaction between megahertz mechanical resonator and nuclear spin ensemble via magnetic field gradient, where spin polarization fluctuations increase the resonator frequency variance.

If this is right

  • Single nuclear spin detection is predicted to be possible using current megahertz resonator devices.
  • The variance measurement provides an alternative to direct mean frequency shift detection in small samples.
  • Nuclear spin ensembles can be sensed without requiring large Boltzmann polarization signals.
  • The method supports both detection and potential control of nuclear spins through the same coupling mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending this to individual spins might allow integration with quantum information protocols using nuclear spins as qubits.
  • Similar variance effects could be explored in other sensor-spin systems, such as with different resonator frequencies or materials.
  • Testing the model with varying spin densities or temperatures could validate the dynamical backaction predictions experimentally.

Load-bearing premise

The increase in frequency variance from spin polarization fluctuations can be accurately modeled and distinguished from other noise sources in the resonator system.

What would settle it

Perform an experiment where the number of nuclear spins is known and reduced toward one, checking if the observed frequency variance increase matches the predicted value from the dynamical backaction equations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.14754 by Alexander Eichler, Christian L. Degen, Diego A. Visani, Javier del Pino, Letizia Catalini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the proposed experiment: A spin ensemble is placed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mean (δω) and standard deviation (σδω) of the frequency shift of a string resonator [13] due to a single proton spin calculated as a function of the detuning between the Larmor frequency ωL and the mechanical frequency ω0. Analytical and numerical results are shown for the two contributions of the spin polarization: Boltzmann (a) and statistical (b). Note the different y-axis scales. Blue lines correspond … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dependence of simulated frequency shift variance on the resonator’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power spectral density (PSD) of the steady state of a simulated SiN [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Single trajectory simulation for a single proton spin interacting with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase and frequency shift of a single trajectory simulation for a sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Numerical simulation of a cobalt nanomagnet (black rectangle) pre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Boltzmann polarization compared to the statistical polarization for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mechanical resonators operating in the megahertz range have become a versatile platform for fundamental and applied quantum research. Their exceptional properties, such as low mass and high quality factor, make them also appealing for force sensing experiments. In this work, we propose a method for detecting, and ultimately controlling, nuclear spins by coupling them to megahertz resonators via a magnetic field gradient. Dynamical backaction between the sensor and an ensemble of $N$ nuclear spins produces a shift in the sensor's resonance frequency. The mean frequency shift due to the Boltzmann polarization is challenging to measure in nanoscale sample volumes. Here, we show that the fluctuating polarization of the spin ensemble results in a measurable increase of the resonator's frequency variance. On the basis of analytical as well as numerical results, we predict that the variance measurement will allow single nuclear spin detection with existing resonator devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes detecting single nuclear spins by coupling an ensemble of N spins to a megahertz mechanical resonator via a magnetic field gradient. Dynamical backaction produces a mean resonance-frequency shift from the Boltzmann polarization that is difficult to resolve in small volumes; instead, the fluctuating polarization is shown to increase the resonator frequency variance. Analytical derivations and numerical simulations are presented to predict that this variance signal enables single-spin detection using existing resonator devices.

Significance. If the variance-based detection threshold is validated, the work would offer a practical route to nanoscale nuclear-spin sensing that sidesteps the small mean-polarization signal. The emphasis on existing MHz resonators and the combination of analytic plus numeric results would strengthen its relevance for quantum sensing and force microscopy platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Noise budget and variance calculation): The analytic expression for the spin-induced frequency variance (derived from the dynamical-backaction model) is compared only to the thermomechanical noise floor; no quantitative comparison is made to published frequency-stability data for existing MHz resonators (e.g., Allan deviation or integrated phase noise at the relevant integration times). This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that single-spin detection is feasible with current devices.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2, Eq. (8)–(10): The derivation of the variance shift assumes that sample-geometry and thermal-environment corrections remain sub-dominant; however, the manuscript provides neither explicit bounds on these corrections nor additional simulations that include realistic cantilever–sample separation variations or temperature fluctuations. For N=1 this assumption directly affects whether the predicted signal remains distinguishable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the legend for the N=1 curve is missing the integration-time value used in the numerical trace.
  2. [Eq. (5)] The definition of the effective coupling strength g_eff in the text following Eq. (5) should explicitly state the units and the averaging procedure over the spin ensemble.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Noise budget and variance calculation): The analytic expression for the spin-induced frequency variance (derived from the dynamical-backaction model) is compared only to the thermomechanical noise floor; no quantitative comparison is made to published frequency-stability data for existing MHz resonators (e.g., Allan deviation or integrated phase noise at the relevant integration times). This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that single-spin detection is feasible with current devices.

    Authors: We agree that benchmarking the predicted variance against published experimental frequency-stability data would strengthen the feasibility claim. Our analysis centers on the thermomechanical noise floor as the fundamental limit, but we recognize that real devices exhibit additional technical noise. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct comparison to representative Allan deviation and phase-noise values reported for megahertz resonators in the literature, using integration times consistent with our proposed variance measurement, to show that the spin-induced signal exceeds typical achieved stabilities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2, Eq. (8)–(10): The derivation of the variance shift assumes that sample-geometry and thermal-environment corrections remain sub-dominant; however, the manuscript provides neither explicit bounds on these corrections nor additional simulations that include realistic cantilever–sample separation variations or temperature fluctuations. For N=1 this assumption directly affects whether the predicted signal remains distinguishable.

    Authors: The derivation in §3.2 isolates the dynamical-backaction contribution under fixed geometry and temperature to obtain a clear analytic result. We acknowledge that explicit bounds on corrections from separation fluctuations or temperature drift would be useful, especially for the N=1 case. In the revision we will add a short discussion with order-of-magnitude estimates of these effects based on typical experimental values (cantilever-sample distances of tens of nanometers and millikelvin temperature stability), demonstrating that the corrections remain sub-dominant relative to the predicted variance signal for the parameters considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; variance prediction follows from independent dynamical backaction modeling

full rationale

The paper derives an increase in resonator frequency variance from fluctuating nuclear spin polarization via analytical and numerical application of dynamical backaction equations. This leads to the prediction of single-spin detectability with existing MHz devices. No step reduces the claimed output to its inputs by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the result is a forward prediction from the interaction model rather than a tautological renaming or fit. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as measured resonator noise floors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central prediction rests on a model of dynamical backaction between resonator and spin ensemble; the abstract does not introduce new free parameters or invented entities but implicitly assumes standard quantum noise and thermal fluctuation relations.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dynamical backaction between mechanical resonator and nuclear spin ensemble produces a frequency shift whose fluctuations increase the observed variance.
    Invoked in the description of the coupling mechanism and variance measurement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1274 out tokens · 31176 ms · 2026-05-18T22:32:09.127282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Cantilevers to Membranes: Advanced Scanning Protocols for Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy

    physics.app-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations indicate that strained SiN resonators paired with multislice compressed-sensing protocols can reduce MRFM acquisition time by up to two orders of magnitude while preserving reconstruction fidelity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. A. Sidles, Noninductive detection of single-proton magnetic resonance , Applied Physics Letters 58(24), 2854 (1991), doi:10.1063/1.104757

    work page doi:10.1063/1.104757 1991

  2. [2]

    Poggio and C

    M. Poggio and C. L. Degen, Force-detected nuclear magnetic resonance: re- cent advances and future challenges , Nanotechnology 21(34), 342001 (2010), doi:10.1088/0957-4484/21/34/342001

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/21/34/342001 2010

  3. [3]

    C. L. Degen, M. Poggio, H. J. Mamin, C. T. Rettner and D. Rugar, Nanoscale mag- netic resonance imaging , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5), 1313 (2009), doi:10.1073/pnas.0812068106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0812068106 2009

  4. [4]

    J. M. Nichol, T. R. Naibert, E. R. Hemesath, L. J. Lauhon and R. Budakian, Nanoscale fourier-transform magnetic resonance imaging , Physical Review X 3(3), 031016 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.031016 2013

  5. [5]

    U. Grob, M. D. Krass, M. H´ eritier, R. Pachlatko, J. Rhensius, J. Koˇ sata, B. A. Moores, H. Takahashi, A. Eichler and C. L. Degen, Magnetic resonance force mi- croscopy with a one-dimensional resolution of 0.9 nanometers , Nano Letters 19(11), 7935 (2019), doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03048

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03048 2019

  6. [6]

    H. Haas, S. Tabatabaei, W. Rose, P. Sahafi, M. Piscitelli, A. Jordan, P. Priyadarsi, N. Singh, B. Yager, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu and R. Budakian, Nuclear magnetic reso- nance diffraction with subangstrom precision , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(40), e2209213119 (2022), doi:10.1073/pnas.2209213119

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2209213119 2022

  7. [7]

    Eichler, Ultra-high-q nanomechanical resonators for force sensing , Materials for Quantum Technology 2(4), 043001 (2022), doi:10.1088/2633-4356/acaba4

    A. Eichler, Ultra-high-q nanomechanical resonators for force sensing , Materials for Quantum Technology 2(4), 043001 (2022), doi:10.1088/2633-4356/acaba4. 26 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page doi:10.1088/2633-4356/acaba4 2022

  8. [8]

    Reinhardt, T

    C. Reinhardt, T. M¨ uller, A. Bourassa and J. C. Sankey,Ultralow-noise sin trampoline resonators for sensing and optomechanics , Physical Review X 6(2), 021001 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021001 2016

  9. [9]

    Norte, J

    R. Norte, J. Moura and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Mechanical resonators for quantum optome- chanics experiments at room temperature , Physical Review Letters 116(14), 147202 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.147202 2016

  10. [10]

    Tsaturyan, A

    Y. Tsaturyan, A. Barg, E. S. Polzik and A. Schliesser, Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamping and dissipation dilution , Nature Nanotechnology 12(8), 776 (2017), doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.101

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.101 2017

  11. [11]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan and A. Schliesser, Measurement- based quantum control of mechanical motion , Nature 563(7729), 53 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8 2018

  12. [12]

    Reetz, R

    C. Reetz, R. Fischer, G. Assump¸ c˜ ao, D. McNally, P. Burns, J. Sankey and C. Regal, Analysis of membrane phononic crystals with wide band gaps and low-mass defects , Physical Review Applied 12(4), 044027 (2019), doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.044027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.044027 2019

  13. [13]

    A. H. Ghadimi, S. A. Fedorov, N. J. Engelsen, M. J. Bereyhi, R. Schilling, D. J. Wilson and T. J. Kippenberg, Elastic strain engineering for ultralow mechanical dissipation, Science 360(6390), 764 (2018), doi:10.1126/science.aar6939

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar6939 2018

  14. [14]

    Beccari, D

    A. Beccari, D. A. Visani, S. A. Fedorov, M. J. Bereyhi, V. Boureau, N. J. Engelsen and T. J. Kippenberg, Strained crystalline nanomechanical resonators with quality factors above 10 billion , Nature Physics 18(4), 436 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01498-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01498-4 2022

  15. [15]

    Gisler, M

    T. Gisler, M. Helal, D. Sabonis, U. Grob, M. H´ eritier, C. L. Degen, A. H. Ghadimi and A. Eichler, Soft-clamped silicon nitride string resonators at millikelvin temperatures , Physical Review Letters 129(10), 104301 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.104301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.104301 2022

  16. [16]

    Cupertino, D

    A. Cupertino, D. Shin, L. Guo, P. G. Steeneken, M. A. Bessa and R. A. Norte, Centimeter-scale nanomechanical resonators with low dissipation , Nature Communi- cations 15(1), 4255 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    M. J. Bereyhi, A. Arabmoheghi, A. Beccari, S. A. Fedorov, G. Huang, T. J. Kip- penberg and N. J. Engelsen, Perimeter modes of nanomechanical resonators exhibit quality factors exceeding 109 at room temperature, Physical Review X 12(2), 021036 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.021036 2022

  18. [18]

    Fedorov, A

    S. Fedorov, A. Beccari, N. Engelsen and T. Kippenberg, Fractal-like mechanical resonators with a soft-clamped fundamental mode , Physical Review Letters 124(2), 025502 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.025502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.025502 2020

  19. [19]

    M. J. Bereyhi, A. Beccari, R. Groth, S. A. Fedorov, A. Arabmoheghi, T. J. Kip- penberg and N. J. Engelsen, Hierarchical tensile structures with ultralow mechanical dissipation, Nature Communications 13(1), 3097 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41467-022- 30586-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022- 2022

  20. [20]

    D. Shin, A. Cupertino, M. H. J. de Jong, P. G. Steeneken, M. A. Bessa and R. A. Norte, Spiderweb nanomechanical resonators via bayesian optimization: Inspired by nature and guided by machine learning , Advanced Materials 34(3), 2270019 (2021), doi:10.1002/adma.202106248. 27 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202106248 2021

  21. [21]

    Moser, J

    J. Moser, J. G¨ uttinger, A. Eichler, M. J. Esplandiu, D. E. Liu, M. I. Dykman and A. Bachtold, Ultrasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator , Nature Nanotechnology 8(7), 493 (2013), doi:10.1038/NNANO.2013.97

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.97 2013

  22. [22]

    Rossi, F

    N. Rossi, F. R. Braakman, D. Cadeddu, D. Vasyukov, G. T¨ ut¨ unc¨ uoglu, A. Fontcu- berta i Morral and M. Poggio, Vectorial scanning force microscopy using a nanowire sensor, Nature Nanotechnology 12(2), 150 (2016), doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.189

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.189 2016

  23. [23]

    H¨ alg, T

    D. H¨ alg, T. Gisler, Y. Tsaturyan, L. Catalini, U. Grob, M.-D. Krass, M. H´ eritier, H. Mattiat, A.-K. Thamm, R. Schirhagl, E. C. Langman, A. Schliesser et al. , Membrane-based scanning force microscopy, Physical Review Applied 15(2), l021001 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.L021001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.l021001 2021

  24. [24]

    Koˇ sata, O

    J. Koˇ sata, O. Zilberberg, C. L. Degen, R. Chitra and A. Eichler, Spin detection via parametric frequency conversion in a membrane resonator , Physical Review Applied 14(1), 014042 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014042 2020

  25. [25]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86(4), 1391 (2014), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 2014

  26. [26]

    Bachtold, J

    A. Bachtold, J. Moser and M. I. Dykman, Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045005 (2022), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045005

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045005 2022

  27. [27]

    J. A. Sidles, Folded stern-gerlach experiment as a means for detecting nuclear mag- netic resonance in individual nuclei , Physical Review Letters 68(8), 1124 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1124

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1124 1992

  28. [28]

    G. P. Berman and V. I. Tsifrinovich, Magnetic resonance force microscopy with matching frequencies of cantilever and spin , Journal of Applied Physics 131(4), 044301 (2022), doi:10.1063/5.0073237

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0073237 2022

  29. [29]

    K. W. Lee, D. Lee, P. Ovartchaiyapong, J. Minguzzi, J. R. Maze and A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, Strain coupling of a mechanical resonator to a single quantum emitter in diamond , Physical Review Applied 6(3), 034005 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.034005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.034005 2016

  30. [30]

    Teissier, A

    J. Teissier, A. Barfuss and P. Maletinsky, Hybrid continuous dynamical decou- pling: a photon-phonon doubly dressed spin , Journal of Optics 19(4), 044003 (2017), doi:10.1088/2040-8986/aa5f62

    work page doi:10.1088/2040-8986/aa5f62 2017

  31. [31]

    E. R. MacQuarrie, T. A. Gosavi, N. R. Jungwirth, S. A. Bhave and G. D. Fuchs, Mechanical spin control of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond , Physical Review Letters 111(22), 227602 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.227602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.227602 2013

  32. [32]

    T. O. Niinikoski, The Physics of Polarized Targets , Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781108475075, doi:10.1017/9781108567435 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108567435 2020

  33. [33]

    C. L. Degen, M. Poggio, H. J. Mamin and D. Rugar, Role of spin noise in the detection of nanoscale ensembles of nuclear spins , Physical Review Letters 99(25), 250601 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.250601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250601 2007

  34. [34]

    thesis, ETH Zurich, doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000536378 (2022)

    Krass, Marc-Dominik, 3D Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000536378 (2022). 28 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000536378 2022

  35. [35]

    C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance , vol. 1 of Springer Series in Solid- State Sciences , Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642- 08069-2 978-3-662-09441-9, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09441-9 (1990)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09441-9 1990

  36. [36]

    2019.Normal Sleep EEG

    M. Krack and J. Gross, Harmonic Balance for Nonlinear Vibration Problems , Springer International Publishing, ISBN 9783030140236, doi:10.1007/978-3-030- 14023-6 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030- 2019

  37. [37]

    Koˇ sata, J

    J. Koˇ sata, J. del Pino, T. L. Heugel and O. Zilberberg, Harmonicbalance.jl: A julia suite for nonlinear dynamics using harmonic balance , SciPost Physics Codebases p. 6 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.6

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.6 2022

  38. [38]

    McCoy and R

    M. McCoy and R. Ernst, Nuclear spin noise at room temperature , Chemical Physics Letters 159(5–6), 587 (1989), doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)87537-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)87537-2 1989

  39. [39]

    Hashin, S

    M. Gu´ eron and J. Leroy, Nmr of water protons. the detection of their nuclear-spin noise, and a simple determination of absolute probe sensitivity based on radiation damping, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 85(1), 209 (1989), doi:10.1016/0022- 2364(89)90338-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0022- 1969

  40. [40]

    V. B. Braginsky and A. Manukin, Ponderomotive effects of electromagnetic radiation, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics (1967)

    work page 1967

  41. [41]

    T. M. Karg, B. Gouraud, C. T. Ngai, G.-L. Schmid, K. Hammerer and P. Treutlein, Light-mediated strong coupling between a mechanical oscillator and atomic spins 1 meter apart, Science 369(6500), 174 (2020), doi:10.1126/science.abb0328

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abb0328 2020

  42. [42]

    R. A. Thomas, M. Parniak, C. Østfeldt, C. B. Møller, C. Bærentsen, Y. Tsaturyan, A. Schliesser, J. Appel, E. Zeuthen and E. S. Polzik, Entanglement between dis- tant macroscopic mechanical and spin systems , Nature Physics 17(2), 228 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1031-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1031-5 2020

  43. [43]

    1993 , file =

    E. Hairer, G. Wanner and S. P. Nørsett, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 9783540788621, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78862-1 (1993)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78862-1 1993

  44. [44]

    B. E. Herzog, D. Cadeddu, F. Xue, P. Peddibhotla and M. Poggio, Boundary between the thermal and statistical polarization regimes in a nuclear spin ensemble , Applied Physics Letters 105(4), 043112 (2014), doi:10.1063/1.4892361

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4892361 2014

  45. [45]

    Y. Seis, T. Capelle, E. Langman, S. Saarinen, E. Planz and A. Schliesser, Ground state cooling of an ultracoherent electromechanical system , Nature Communications 13(1), 1507 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29115-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29115-9 2022

  46. [46]

    T. R. Albrecht, P. Gr¨ utter, D. Horne and D. Rugar, Frequency modulation detection using high-q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity , Journal of Applied Physics 69(2), 668 (1991), doi:10.1063/1.347347

    work page doi:10.1063/1.347347 1991

  47. [47]

    Schmid, L

    S. Schmid, L. G. Villanueva and M. L. Roukes, Fundamentals of Nanomechanical Resonators, Springer International Publishing, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28691-4 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28691-4 2016

  48. [48]

    D. W. Allan, J. E. Gray and H. E. Machlan, The national bureau of stan- dards atomic time scales: Generation, dissemination, stability, and accuracy , IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 21(4), 388 (1972), doi:10.1109/TIM.1972.4314051. 29 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.1972.4314051 1972

  49. [49]

    Bloch, Nuclear induction , Physical Review 70(7–8), 460 (1946), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.460

    F. Bloch, Nuclear induction , Physical Review 70(7–8), 460 (1946), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.460

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.70.460 1946

  50. [50]

    Rugar, R

    D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. J. Mamin and B. W. Chui, Single spin detec- tion by magnetic resonance force microscopy , Nature 430(6997), 329 (2004), doi:10.1038/nature02658

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02658 2004

  51. [51]

    Gavartin, P

    E. Gavartin, P. Verlot and T. J. Kippenberg, Stabilization of a linear nanomechanical oscillator to its thermodynamic limit , Nature Communications 4(1), 2860 (2013), doi:10.1038/ncomms3860

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms3860 2013

  52. [52]

    Poggio, C

    M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, C. T. Rettner, H. J. Mamin and D. Rugar, Nuclear mag- netic resonance force microscopy with a microwire rf source, Applied Physics Letters 90(26), 263111 (2007), doi:10.1063/1.2752536

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2752536 2007

  53. [53]

    Hunger, S

    D. Hunger, S. Camerer, M. Korppi, A. J¨ ockel, T. H¨ ansch and P. Treutlein,Coupling ultracold atoms to mechanical oscillators , Comptes Rendus Physique 12(9–10), 871 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2011.04.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2011.04.015 2011

  54. [54]

    M. C. Butler and D. P. Weitekamp, Polarization of nuclear spins by a cold nanoscale resonator , Physical Review A 84(6), 063407 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.063407

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.063407 2011

  55. [55]

    Nunnenkamp, V

    A. Nunnenkamp, V. Sudhir, A. Feofanov, A. Roulet and T. Kippenberg, Quantum- limited amplification and parametric instability in the reversed dissipation regime of cavity optomechanics , Physical Review Letters 113(2), 023604 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.023604

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.023604 2014

  56. [56]

    R. Ohta, L. Herpin, V. Bastidas, T. Tawara, H. Yamaguchi and H. Okamoto, Rare- earth-mediated optomechanical system in the reversed dissipation regime , Physical Review Letters 126(4), 047404 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.047404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.047404 2021

  57. [57]

    Kirton and J

    P. Kirton and J. Keeling, Suppressing and restoring the dicke superradiance tran- sition by dephasing and decay , Physical Review Letters 118(12), 123602 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.123602 2017

  58. [58]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, Y. Shchadilova, E. Y. Wilner, M. D. Lukin and E. Demler, Dicke phase transition without total spin conservation , Physical Review A 94(6), 061802 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.061802

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.061802 2016

  59. [59]

    J. M. Dobrindt and T. J. Kippenberg, Theoretical analysis of mechanical displace- ment measurement using a multiple cavity mode transducer , Physical Review Letters 104(3), 033901 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.033901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.033901 2010

  60. [60]

    Burgwal, J

    R. Burgwal, J. d. Pino and E. Verhagen, Comparing nonlinear optomechanical cou- pling in membrane-in-the-middle and single-cavity systems , New Journal of Physics 22(11), 113006 (2020), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abc1c8

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abc1c8 2020

  61. [61]

    Burgwal and E

    R. Burgwal and E. Verhagen, Enhanced nonlinear optomechanics in a coupled- mode photonic crystal device , Nature Communications 14(1), 1526 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37138-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37138-z 2023

  62. [62]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non- Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics , Springer Science & Business Media (2004). 30 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    R. H. Rand, Lecture Notes on Nonlinear Vibrations , http://audiophile.tam. cornell.edu/randdocs/nlvibe52.pdf (2005)

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    InEvolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, António Gaspar-Cunha, Carlos Henggeler Antunes, and Carlos Coello Coello (Eds.)

    P. Breiding and S. Timme, Homotopycontinuation.jl: A package for homotopy con- tinuation in julia , In Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 10931 LNCS, pp. 458–465. Springer International Publishing, ISBN 9783319964188, doi:10.1007/978- 3-319-96418-8 54 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2018

  65. [65]

    L. A. Lugiato, P. Mandel and L. M. Narducci, Adiabatic elimination in nonlinear dynamical systems , Physical Review A 29(3), 1438 (1984), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1438

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.29.1438 1984

  66. [66]

    M. J. Bhaseen, J. Mayoh, B. D. Simons and J. Keeling, Dynamics of nonequilibrium dicke models , Physical Review A 85(1), 013817 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.013817

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.013817 2012

  67. [67]

    Chitra and O

    R. Chitra and O. Zilberberg, Dynamical many-body phases of the parametri- cally driven, dissipative dicke model , Physical Review A 92(2), 023815 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023815

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.023815 2015

  68. [68]

    Kocman, G

    V. Kocman, G. M. Di Mauro, G. Veglia and A. Ramamoorthy, Use of paramagnetic systems to speed-up nmr data acquisition and for structural and dynamic studies, Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 102, 36 (2019), doi:10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.07.002 2019

  69. [69]

    Eichler and O

    A. Eichler and O. Zilberberg, Classical and quantum parametric phenomena , Oxford University Press (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    J. G. Longenecker, H. J. Mamin, A. W. Senko, L. Chen, C. T. Rettner, D. Rugar and J. A. Marohn, High-gradient nanomagnets on cantilevers for sensitive detection of nuclear magnetic resonance, ACS Nano 6(11), 9637 (2012), doi:10.1021/nn3030628. 31

    work page doi:10.1021/nn3030628 2012