Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Probing Magnetic Properties of RuO$_{2}$ Heterostructures Through the Ferromagnetic Layer

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Thin-film RuO2 shows no intrinsic magnetic order; apparent antiferromagnetic signatures come from interfaces.

desk verdict A smart two-sample design for the RuO2 altermagnet question, but the central null result is uncalibrated and the abstract's own hedging points to a softer conclusion than its first sentence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15004 v1 pith:VF4NSZT6 submitted 2025-08-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Frank M. Abel , Subhash Bhatt , Shelby S. Fields , Vinay Sharma , Dai Q. Ho , Daniel Wines , D. Quang To , Joseph C. Prestigiacomo
show 15 more authors
Tehseen Adel Riccardo Torsi Maria F. Munoz David T. Plouff Xinhao Wang Brian Donovan Don Heiman Gregory M. Stephen Adam L. Friedman Garnett W. Bryant Anderson Janotti Michelle E. Jamer Angela R. Hight Walker John Q. Xiao Steven P. Bennett
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.70.-i75.50.Ee78.30.-j
keywords RuO2altermagnetismexchangebiasmagneto-Ramanspectroscopymagnonthin-filmheterostructuresinterfaceeffectsantiferromagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

RuO2 has been proposed as the prototypical altermagnet, a material whose magnetic order has a unique spin-split band structure without net magnetization. This paper tests that claim in thin films by combining magnetometry and magneto-Raman spectroscopy on RuO2/NiFe and RuO2/Fe heterostructures grown independently in two labs. Both show exchange bias below about 15 K, the signature usually attributed to an antiferromagnetic or altermagnetic RuO2 layer. But bare RuO2 thin films show no magnon mode in magneto-Raman; the magnon appears only when a NiFe layer is present. The authors conclude that the apparent antiferromagnetic behavior is an interface effect—interlayer diffusion or interfacial spin disorder supported by DFT—not intrinsic long-range magnetic order in RuO2.

What carries the argument

The central probe is the magnon mode in magneto-Raman spectroscopy—an inelastic-light-scattering signature of collective spin excitations that should appear if a material has long-range magnetic order. The paper uses two measurement pillars: magnetometry of exchange bias in RuO2/NiFe and RuO2/Fe heterostructures, and Raman detection of magnons in bare versus ferromagnet-capped RuO2 films. The comparison carries the argument: the magnon appears only with the NiFe layer, so the ordered state must be tied to the interface rather than intrinsic to RuO2; DFT calculations provide the microscopic routes (diffusion, interface spin disorder).

What would settle it

A magnon mode observed in a bare RuO2 thin film—with known thickness, stoichiometry, and sensitivity limits, at temperatures down to 2 K—would directly contradict the claim that RuO2 films lack intrinsic magnetic ordering. Conversely, element-specific depth profiling (e.g., atomically resolved EELS) showing no interdiffusion while exchange bias persists would weaken the interface-diffusion explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that thin-film RuO2 does not exhibit an intrinsic magnetic excitation expected from antiferromagnetic or altermagnetic order: magneto-Raman measurements on RuO2 films reveal a magnon mode only in the presence of a NiFe ferromagnetic layer. In both independently grown heterostructures, field-cooling in +1 T produces exchange bias below about 15 K and a spin-transition feature near 31 K, yet the absence of the magnon in the bare film points away from a bulk-like ordered RuO2 layer. The authors argue that exchange-bias-like signatures observed in RuO2/ferromagnet bilayers can be explained by interlayer diffusion or spin disorder at the interface, as their

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion assumes the magneto-Raman setup on the bare RuO2 film would have detected a magnon if long-range magnetic order were present, and that the bare film represents the RuO2 inside the exchange-biased heterostructures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Exchange bias measured in RuO2/ferromagnet bilayers should not be taken as standalone evidence for altermagnetic order in RuO2.
  • The magnon mode observed with a NiFe cap is an interface-driven feature, so interface quality and capping material control the magnetic response.
  • Thin-film RuO2 cannot serve as the prototypical altermagnet until magnetic order is demonstrated on a free or nonmagnetic-capped surface.
  • Interlayer diffusion and interfacial spin disorder are concrete alternatives to intrinsic order; DFT calculations identify them as plausible in the studied samples.
  • Reported antiferromagnetic/altermagnetic signatures in RuO2 heterostructures may require re-examination for interface contributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The null Raman result is silent on bulk RuO2 crystals: the paper's conclusion is about thin films, and bulk altermagnetic order could still exist if film growth suppresses it.
  • A decisive test would be a temperature-dependent magneto-Raman and neutron or muon measurement on the same bare film with calibrated sensitivity; a magnon appearing below a lower temperature would invalidate the 'no intrinsic order' reading.
  • If interface disorder drives exchange bias, then controlled annealing or diffusion-barrier layers should tune or eliminate the bias; that prediction is testable without invoking altermagnetism.
  • The 31 K spin-transition feature, if verified by specific heat or susceptibility, may track interfacial moments rather than a bulk RuO2 transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports magnetometry and magneto-Raman measurements on two RuO2/ferromagnet heterostructures (RuO2/NiFe and RuO2/Fe) grown independently. Both samples show exchange bias below about 15 K after field cooling in +1 T, and a spin-related feature near 31 K. The central claim is that magneto-Raman measurements on bare RuO2 thin films show no magnon mode, whereas a magnon appears when a NiFe layer is present; the authors conclude that RuO2 does not intrinsically possess long-range magnetic ordering, and that the exchange bias observed in heterostructures arises from interlayer diffusion or interface spin disorder, supported by DFT calculations. The paper is framed as evidence against intrinsic altermagnetic order in thin-film RuO2.

Significance. If the conclusion is correct, this is a timely and important negative result for the altermagnet debate: it would shift the interpretation of exchange bias and related signatures in RuO2/ferromagnet heterostructures from intrinsic antiferromagnetic/altermagnetic order to interface-driven effects. The study has genuine strengths: two independently grown heterostructures show consistent exchange-bias behavior, the magneto-Raman null result is a falsifiable observation, and the authors do not overfit parameters. However, the central negative claim rests on an uncalibrated null Raman measurement, and the supporting DFT statement is presented without computational detail. The manuscript currently does not provide the sensitivity controls or film-state comparisons needed to elevate the conclusion from suggestive to established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, final sentence] The central inference is a null result: the absence of a magnon mode in bare RuO2 is taken to mean no long-range magnetic order. For this inference to be valid, the same measurement must be shown capable of detecting the putative RuO2 magnon if it existed. The manuscript gives no positive control (e.g., a known antiferromagnet under identical conditions), no estimate of Raman sensitivity or probe volume, and no statement of the Raman measurement temperature relative to the 15 K exchange-bias onset and the 31 K feature. If the Raman spectra were collected above 31 K, the null would be expected even for ordered RuO2. Please report the laser wavelength, polarization/scattering geometry, spectral range, temperature, and an explicit detection limit.
  2. [Abstract / sample characterization] The bare RuO2 film used for the null measurement is assumed to represent the RuO2 layer inside the exchange-biased heterostructures. The manuscript does not provide thicknesses, growth conditions, stoichiometry checks, or structural comparison (XRD, TEM/STEM) between bare and capped films. A bare film may differ from the interface-adjacent RuO2 layer in strain, oxygen content, or crystallinity; conversely, capping with NiFe/Fe may alter the RuO2 layer via intermixing. Without this information, the null on the bare film does not constrain the state of RuO2 in the heterostructures. Ideally, Raman should be measured on the same film before and after capping, or on a control capped with a nonmagnetic layer.
  3. [Abstract / Conclusions (DFT support)] The text states that the observed behavior points to 'diffusion between the layers or spin disorder at the interface as seen by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.' No DFT method, supercell, disorder model, or energy scales are reported in the readable portion of the manuscript. As presented, this is a hypothesis, not supporting evidence. The DFT statement cannot convert the null Raman observation into a positive mechanism for exchange bias. Either provide the calculations with sufficient detail for evaluation or explicitly label the interpretation as a conjecture to be tested by future work.
  4. [Magnetometry results / Table 1] The exchange-bias observations are central to the interpretation, but the manuscript reports no error bars, sample-to-sample statistics, or definition of the 31 K feature. Are the exchange-bias fields reproducible to within, say, 10% or 50%? Is the 31 K feature a peak, an inflection, or a hysteresis change? Without quantified values and a clear definition, the reader cannot judge whether the 31 K feature is intrinsic to RuO2 or arises from the ferromagnetic layer. Please add error bars or multiple-sample data, and define the feature operationally.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo: 'long range magnetic ordering..' contains a double period. Also, 'spin transitional feature' is awkward; consider 'magnetic transition feature' or 'spin-reorientation feature' with a definition.
  2. [Body text] The version provided to me has extensive character corruption (mojibake) in the body text, tables, and equations, making it impossible to verify section-level details. Please ensure the submitted manuscript is not corrupted and that all figure/table captions are readable.
  3. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract states that 'several reports have recently questioned its intrinsic magnetic ordering' but does not cite them in the abstract; the main text should clearly distinguish these conflicting findings and explain how the present work resolves the discrepancy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central negative claim is an independent experimental null result, with DFT used only as post-hoc interpretive support.

full rationale

The paper's inference chain is empirical: it measures exchange bias and a spin-transition feature in RuO2/NiFe and RuO2/Fe heterostructures, performs magneto-Raman on bare RuO2 and on RuO2 with a NiFe overlayer, observes a magnon only in the capped case, and concludes that intrinsic long-range magnetic ordering in the bare RuO2 film is not supported. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation or definition makes the conclusion identical to the input. The DFT statement in the abstract ('possible diffusion between the layers or spin disorder at the interface as seen by density functional theory (DFT) calculations') is offered as a qualitative interpretation of the interface effects, not as the source of the magnon null result. The central claim therefore does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The main vulnerability of the argument—that the null Raman result could be due to insufficient sensitivity or to differences between bare and capped films—is a validity or correctness concern, not circular reasoning, because the conclusion is not assumed in the measurement. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is present in the available text. The paper is self-contained in the sense required for a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on a null Raman measurement interpreted through an implicit sensitivity assumption, and on transferring the bare-film measurement to the RuO2 layer inside heterostructures. No fitted free parameters are evident from the abstract; the reported thresholds (15 K, 31 K, +1 T) are measurement conditions or observed features, not adjustable model inputs. The proposed interface mechanisms are known physical processes, not newly invented entities.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Magneto-Raman on bare RuO2 thin films has sufficient sensitivity to detect a magnon mode if long-range altermagnetic order were present.
    The central negative conclusion depends on absence of a magnon peak being meaningful. Appears in the abstract sentence: 'Magneto-Raman measurements on RuO2 thin films only reveal a magnon mode when there is a NiFe layer...'.
  • domain assumption The bare films measured by Raman are structurally and stoichiometrically representative of the RuO2 layers inside the exchange-biased heterostructures.
    If the bare film differs in thickness, strain, stoichiometry, or growth conditions from the interfaced film, the comparison between the Raman null result and the magnetometry is invalid. No such characterization is reported in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Density functional theory calculations of interdiffusion or spin disorder at the RuO2/ferromagnet interface are accurate enough to support the interface-effect interpretation.
    The abstract ends with 'as seen by density functional theory (DFT) calculations'. DFT is a modeling choice whose interface energetics and magnetic configuration depend on approximations, not an independent measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Magnetic Properties of RuO$_{2}$ Heterostructures Through the Ferromagnetic Layer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VF4NSZT6

@misc{pith2026250815004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Magnetic Properties of RuO$_2$ Heterostructures Through the Ferromagnetic Layer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VF4NSZT6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15004}
}
abstract

RuO$_{2}$ has been proposed as the prototypical altermagnetic material. However, several reports have recently questioned its intrinsic magnetic ordering, leading to conflicting findings, especially in thin film heterostructures pointing to possible interface effects being convoluted with supposed antiferromagnetic/altermagnetic signatures. Here, extensive magnetometry measurements were performed on two independently grown thin film heterostructures of RuO$_{2}$ interfaced with either NiFe or Fe acting as the ferromagnetic layer. Below about 15 K, both samples exhibit exchange bias fields when cooled to approximately 2 K in a $+$1 T field, and a spin transitional feature is observed around 31 K. Magneto-Raman measurements on RuO$_{2}$ thin films only reveal a magnon mode when there is a NiFe layer, suggesting that RuO$_{2}$ does not intrinsically possess long range magnetic ordering.. When in contact with a ferromagnet, RuO$_2$ displays effects that could be ascribed to antiferromagnetism. However, the lack of intrinsic magnon modes points toward possible diffusion between the layers or spin disorder at the interface as seen by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions in non-altermagnetic Ru$_{1-x}$Cr$_{x}$O$_{2}$

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chromium alloying does not turn ruthenium dioxide into an altermagnet; chromium moments form ferromagnetic clusters with antiferromagnetic inter-cluster coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S S mejkal , author J

    author author L. S S mejkal , author J. Sinova , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 12 ,\ pages 040501 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022

  2. [2]

    author author M. B. \ Jungfleisch , author W. Zhang , \ and\ author A. Hoffmann ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 382 ,\ pages 865 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  3. [3]

    Zhang , author H

    author author Y. Zhang , author H. Bai , author L. Han , author C. Chen , author Y. Zhou , author C. Back , author F. Pan , author Y. Wang , \ and\ author C. Song ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202313332 journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 34 ,\ pages 2313332 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/adfm.202313332 2024

  4. [4]

    Chi , author L

    author author B. Chi , author L. Jiang , author Y. Zhu , author G. Yu , author C. Wan , author J. Zhang , \ and\ author X. Han ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.034038 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 034038 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.034038 2024

  5. [5]

    Ryden \ and\ author A

    author author W. Ryden \ and\ author A. Lawson ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 52 ,\ pages 6058 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970

  6. [6]

    Fletcher , author W

    author author J. Fletcher , author W. Gardner , author B. Greenfield , author M. Holdoway , \ and\ author M. Rand ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of the Chemical Society A: Inorganic, Physical, Theoretical \ volume 0 ,\ pages 653 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968

  7. [7]

    Over ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 112 ,\ pages 3356 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author H. Over ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 112 ,\ pages 3356 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Mukuda , author K

    author author H. Mukuda , author K. Ishida , author Y. Kitaoka , author K. Asayama , author R. Kanno , \ and\ author M. Takano ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.12279 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 60 ,\ pages 12279 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.12279 1999

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Berlijn , author P

    author author T. Berlijn , author P. C. \ Snijders , author O. Delaire , author H.-D. \ Zhou , author T. A. \ Maier , author H.-B. \ Cao , author S.-X. \ Chi , author M. Matsuda , author Y. Wang , author M. R. \ Koehler , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters...

    2017

  2. [10]

    author author Z. H. \ Zhu , author J. Strempfer , author R. R. \ Rao , author C. A. \ Occhialini , author J. Pelliciari , author Y. Choi , author T. Kawaguchi , author H. You , author J. F. \ Mitchell , author Y. Shao-Horn , \ and\ author R. Comin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.01...

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Yi-Chi , author B

    author author Z. Yi-Chi , author B. Hua , author Z. Dong-Hui , author C. Chong , author H. Lei , author L. Shi-Xuan , author C. Rui-Yue , author D. Jian-Kun , author S. Maciek , author P. Feng , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Chin. Phys. Lett. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 027301 ( ye...

    2025

  4. [12]

    Uchida , author T

    author author M. Uchida , author T. Nomoto , author M. Musashi , author R. Arita , \ and\ author M. Kawasaki ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.147001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 147001 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Ruf , author H

    author author J. Ruf , author H. Paik , author N. J. \ Schreiber , author H. P. \ Nair , author L. Miao , author J. K. \ Kawasaki , author J. N. \ Nelson , author B. D. \ Faeth , author Y. Lee , author B. H. \ Goodge , author B. Pamuk , author C. J. \ Fennie , author L. F. \ K...

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Fedchenko , author J

    author author O. Fedchenko , author J. Minár , author A. Akashdeep , author S. W. \ D’Souza , author D. Vasilyev , author O. Tkach , author L. Odenbreit , author Q. Nguyen , author D. Kutnyakhov , author N. Wind , author L. Wenthaus , author M. Scholz , author K. Rossnagel , a...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Feng , author X

    author author Z. Feng , author X. Zhou , author L. Šmejkal , author L. Lei Wu , author H. Zhu , Z. Huixin Guo , author R. González-Hernández , author X. Xiaoning Wang , author H. Yan , author P. Qin , author X. Zhang , author H. Wu , author H. Chen , author Z. Meng , author L....

    2022

  8. [16]

    Tschirner , author P

    author author T. Tschirner , author P. Ke ler , author R. D. \ Gonzalez Betancourt , author T. Kotte , author D. Kriegner , author B. B \"u chner , author J. Dufouleur , author M. Kamp , author V. Jovic , author L. Smejkal , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal APL Materials \ volu...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Smolyanyuk , author I

    author author A. Smolyanyuk , author I. I. \ Mazin , author L. Garcia-Gassull , \ and\ author R. Valent\' ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.134424 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 109 ,\ pages 134424 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Hiraishi , author H

    author author M. Hiraishi , author H. Okabe , author A. Koda , author R. Kadono , author T. Muroi , author D. Hirai , \ and\ author Z. Hiroi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.166702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 166702 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Ke ler , author L

    author author P. Ke ler , author L. Garcia-Gassull , author A. Suter , author T. Prokscha , author Z. Salman , author D. Khalyavin , author F. Orlandi , author I. Mazin , author Valent\'i , \ and\ author S. Moser ,\ 10.1038/s44306-024-00055-y journal journal npj spintronics \ ...

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Liu , author J

    author author J. Liu , author J. Zhan , author T. Li , author J. Liu , author S. Cheng , author Y. Shi , author L. Deng , author M. Zhang , author C. Li , author J. Ding , author Q. Jiang , author M. Ye , author Z. Liu , author Z. Jiang , author S. Wang , author Q. Li , author...

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    author author D. T. \ Plouff , author L. Scheuer , author S. Shrestha , author W. Wu , author N. J. \ Parvez , author S. Bhatt , author X. Wang , author L. Gundlach , author M. B. \ Jungfleisch , \ and\ author J. Q. \ Xiao ,\ @noop journal journal npj Spintronics \ volume 3 ,\...

    2025

  14. [22]

    Kiefer , author F

    author author L. Kiefer , author F. Wirth , author A. Bertin , author P. Becker , author L. Bohat \`y , author K. Schmalzl , author A. Stunault , author J. A. \ Rodr \' guez-Velamaz \'a n , author O. Fabelo , \ and\ author M. Braden ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics:...

    2025

  15. [23]

    Wu , author A

    author author X. Wu , author A. J. \ Grutter , author R. Liu , author P. P. \ Balakrishnan , author C. J. \ Kinane , author A. J. \ Caruana , author Y. Zhang , author X. Ren , author Y. Jiang , author R. Lortz , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume ...

    2025

  16. [24]

    Osumi , author K

    author author T. Osumi , author K. Yamauchi , author S. Souma , author P. Shubhankar , author A. Honma , author K. Nakayama , author K. Ozawa , author M. Kitamura , author K. Horiba , author H. Kumigashira , author C. Bigi , author F. Bertran , author T. Oguchi , author T. Tak...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Lin , author D

    author author Z. Lin , author D. Chen , author W. Lu , author X. Liang , author S. Feng , author K. Yamagami , author J. Osiecki , author M. Leandersson , author B. Thiagarajan , author J. Liu , author C. Felser , \ and\ author J. Ma ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.134450 journal jour...

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    \ Liao , author Y.-C

    author author C.-T. \ Liao , author Y.-C. \ Wang , author Y.-C. \ Tien , author S.-Y. \ Huang , \ and\ author D. Qu ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 133 ,\ pages 056701 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    2024

  19. [27]

    Kobayashi , author S

    author author Y. Kobayashi , author S. Karube , author I. Sugiura , author H. Narita , author R. Hisatomi , author Y. Shiota , \ and\ author T. Ono ,\ 10.1063/5.0213320 journal journal AIP Advances \ volume 14 ,\ pages 115120 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs....

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Bose , author N

    author author A. Bose , author N. J. \ Schreiber , author R. Jain , author D.-F. \ Shao , author H. P. \ Nair , author J. Sun , author X. S. \ Zhang , author D. A. \ Muller , author E. Y. \ Tsymbal , author D. G. \ Schlom , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Electronics \ ...

    2022

  21. [29]

    \ Ahn , author A

    author author K.-H. \ Ahn , author A. Hariki , author K.-W. \ Lee , \ and\ author J. Kune s ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 184432 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  22. [30]

    Bai , author Y

    author author H. Bai , author Y. Zhang , author Y. Zhou , author P. Chen , author C. Wan , author L. Han , author W. Zhu , author S. Liang , author Y. Su , author X. Han , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 130 ,\ pages 216701 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  23. [31]

    Hariki , author Y

    author author A. Hariki , author Y. Takahashi , \ and\ author J. Kune s s ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.094413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 109 ,\ pages 094413 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    author author T. A. \ Maier \ and\ author S. Okamoto ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L100402 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages L100402 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Hariki , author T

    author author A. Hariki , author T. Okauchi , author Y. Takahashi , \ and\ author J. Kune s s ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L100402 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 110 ,\ pages L100402 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Wenzel , author E

    author author M. Wenzel , author E. Uykur , author S. R \"o ler , author M. Schmidt , author O. Janson , author A. Tiwari , author M. Dressel , \ and\ author A. A. \ Tsirlin ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 111 ,\ pages L041115 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  27. [35]

    Fan , author Q

    author author Y. Fan , author Q. Zhang , author T. Lin , author H. Bai , author C. Huo , author Q. Jin , author T. Deng , author S. Choi , author S. Chen , author H. Hong , author T. Cu , author Q. Wang , author D. Rong , author C. Liu , author C. Ge , author T. Zhu , author L...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Akashdeep , author E

    author author A. Akashdeep , author E. M. \ Ababneh , author C. Schmitt , author E. Gal \' ndez-Ruales , author F. Fuhrmann , author T. Kuschel , author M. Kl \"a ui , author V. P. \ Amin , \ and\ author G. Jakob ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00230 \ ( yea...

    2025

  29. [37]

    author author S. G. \ Jeong , author S. Lee , author B. Lin , author Z. Yang , author I. H. \ Choi , author J. Y. \ Oh , author S. Song , author S. w. \ Lee , author S. Nair , author R. Choudhary , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences...

    2025

  30. [38]

    Nogués \ and\ author I

    author author J. Nogués \ and\ author I. K. \ Schuller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 journal journal Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials \ volume 192 ,\ pages 203 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  31. [39]

    author author I. J. \ McDonald , author M. E. \ Jamer , author K. L. \ Krycka , author E. Anber , author D. Foley , author A. C. \ Lang , author W. D. \ Ratcliff , author D. Heiman , author M. L. \ Taheri , author J. A. \ Borchers , \ and\ author L. H. \ Lewis ,\ 10.1021/acsan...

    1940 doi

  32. [40]

    Ali , author P

    author author M. Ali , author P. Adie , author C. H. \ Marrows , author D. Greig , author B. J. \ Hickey , \ and\ author R. L. \ Stamps ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 6 ,\ pages 70 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  33. [41]

    author author A. K. \ Khorwal , author S. Saha , author A. V. \ Lukoyanov , \ and\ author A. K. \ Patra ,\ 10.1063/5.0202812 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 160 ,\ pages 114705 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-...

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Nayak , author P

    author author S. Nayak , author P. K. \ Manna , author T. Vijayabaskaran , author B. B. \ Singh , author J. A. \ Chelvane , \ and\ author S. Bedanta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166267 journal journal Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials \ volume 499 ,\ pages ...

    2019

  35. [43]

    Vafaee , author S

    author author M. Vafaee , author S. Finizio , author H. Deniz , author D. Hesse , author H. Zabel , author G. Jakob , \ and\ author M. Kläui ,\ 10.1063/1.4941795 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 108 ,\ pages 072401 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://...

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    Ding , author O

    author author J. Ding , author O. Lebedev , author S. Turner , author Y. Tian , author W. Hu , author J. Seo , author C. Panagopoulos , author W. Prellier , author G. Van Tendeloo , \ and\ author T. Wu ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials P...

    2013

  37. [45]

    Moutis , author C

    author author N. Moutis , author C. Christides , author I. Panagiotopoulos , \ and\ author D. Niarchos ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 64 ,\ pages 094429 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  38. [46]

    Karmakar , author S

    author author S. Karmakar , author S. Taran , author E. Bose , author B. Chaudhuri , author C. Sun , author C. Huang , \ and\ author H. Yang ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 144409 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  39. [47]

    Huang , author J

    author author X. Huang , author J. Ding , author G. Zhang , author Y. Hou , author Y. Yao , \ and\ author X. Li ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 78 ,\ pages 224408 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  40. [48]

    Mugiraneza \ and\ author A

    author author S. Mugiraneza \ and\ author A. M. \ Hallas ,\ @noop journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 95 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  41. [49]

    Garcia-Gaitan , author A

    author author F. Garcia-Gaitan , author A. Kefayati , author J. Q. \ Xiao , \ and\ author B. K. \ Nikolic ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19433 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S mejkal , author A

    author author L. S mejkal , author A. Marmodoro , author K.-H. \ Ahn , author R. Gonz \'a lez-Hern \'a ndez , author I. Turek , author S. Mankovsky , author H. Ebert , author S. W. \ D’Souza , author O. S ipr , author J. Sinova , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Mar , author C

    author author S. Mar , author C. Chen , author Y. Huang , \ and\ author K. Tiong ,\ @noop journal journal Applied surface science \ volume 90 ,\ pages 497 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  44. [52]

    \ Meng , author V

    author author L.-j. \ Meng , author V. Teixeira , \ and\ author M. Dos Santos ,\ @noop journal journal Thin Solid Films \ volume 442 ,\ pages 93 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  45. [53]

    author author M. M. \ Jevti \'c , author E. V. \ Jelenkovi \'c , author K. Tong , \ and\ author G. Pang ,\ @noop journal journal Thin Solid Films \ volume 496 ,\ pages 214 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  46. [54]

    McCreary , author J

    author author A. McCreary , author J. R. \ Simpson , author T. T. \ Mai , author R. D. \ McMichael , author J. E. \ Douglas , author N. Butch , author C. Dennis , author R. Vald \'e s Aguilar , \ and\ author A. R. \ Hight Walker ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ vol...

    2020

  47. [55]

    Liu , author Z

    author author H. Liu , author Z. Wang , author H. Lim , author S. Ng , author M. Kuok , author D. Lockwood , author M. Cottam , author K. Nielsch , \ and\ author U. G \"o sele ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of applied physics \ volume 98 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  48. [56]

    author author D. Q. \ Ho , author D. Q. \ To , author R. Hu , author G. W. \ Bryant , \ and\ author A. Janotti ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03751 title Symmetry-breaking induced surface magnetization in non-magnetic ruo _2 , \ ( year 2025 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03751 a...

    2025

  49. [57]

    Torun , author C

    author author E. Torun , author C. Fang , author G. De Wijs , \ and\ author R. De Groot ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 117 ,\ pages 6353 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  50. [58]

    Ma , author M

    author author Z. Ma , author M. E. \ Jamer , author E. Panaitescu , author D. Heiman , \ and\ author L. Menon ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials \ volume 394 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  51. [59]

    Heiman ,\ @noop journal journal Semiconductors and Semimetals \ volume 36 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    author author D. Heiman ,\ @noop journal journal Semiconductors and Semimetals \ volume 36 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  52. [60]

    Lakshmi , author G

    author author B. Lakshmi , author G. Favrot , \ and\ author D. Heiman ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Quantum Sensing and Nanophotonic Devices ,\ Vol.\ volume 5359 \ ( organization SPIE ,\ year 2004 )\ pp.\ pages 290--300 NoStop

    2004

  53. [61]

    Furdyna ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2002 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    author author J. Furdyna ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2002 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    2002

  54. [62]

    Bhattacharjee , author K

    author author N. Bhattacharjee , author K. Mahalingam , author A. Fedorko , author A. Will-Cole , author J. Ryu , author M. Page , author M. McConney , author H. Fang , author D. Heiman , \ and\ author N. X. \ Sun ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Applied Electronic Materials \ vol...

    2022

  55. [63]

    Bhattacharjee , author K

    author author N. Bhattacharjee , author K. Mahalingam , author A. Fedorko , author V. Lauter , author M. Matzelle , author B. Singh , author A. Grutter , author A. Will-Cole , author M. Page , author M. McConney , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 34 ...

    2022

  56. [64]

    Will-Cole , author J

    author author A. Will-Cole , author J. L. \ Hart , author M. Matzelle , author A. Podpirka , author N. Bhattacharjee , author S. K. \ Patel , author S. H. \ Tolbert , author A. Bansil , author J. J. \ Cha , author D. Heiman , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Mat...

    2023

  57. [65]

    Liao , author C

    author author X. Liao , author C. Wang , author D. Zhao , author W. Tang , author H. Liang , author Y.-J. \ Zeng , author C. Van Haesendonck , author Q. Song , \ and\ author H. Liu ,\ 10.1063/5.0209098 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 11 ,\ pages 041405 ( year ...

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    \ Wang , author C.-J

    author author B.-Y. \ Wang , author C.-J. \ Chen , author K. Lin , author C.-Y. \ Hsu , author J.-Y. \ Ning , author M.-S. \ Tsai , author T.-H. \ Chuang , author D.-H. \ Wei , \ and\ author S.-C. \ Weng ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147501 journal journal Applied S...

    2020

  59. [67]

    Fan , author K

    author author Y. Fan , author K. Smith , author A. Hanbick , author R. Goswami , author C. Li , author H. Zhao , \ and\ author B. Jonker ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.94 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 8 ,\ pages 438 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    Hada , author K

    author author M. Hada , author K. Sumiyama , \ and\ author Y. Nakamura ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211080130 journal journal physica status solidi (a) \ volume 108 ,\ pages 295 ( year 1988 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pssa.2211...

    1988 doi

  61. [69]

    Fujimori \ and\ author H

    author author H. Fujimori \ and\ author H. Sait \^o ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 26 ,\ pages 1115 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969

  62. [70]

    Jain , author S

    author author A. Jain , author S. P. \ Ong , author G. Hautier , author W. Chen , author W. D. \ Richards , author S. Dacek , author S. Cholia , author D. Gunter , author D. Skinner , author G. Ceder , \ and\ author K. A. \ Persson ,\ 10.1063/1.4812323 journal journal APL Mate...

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    Koziol-Rachwal , author M

    author author A. Koziol-Rachwal , author M. Szpytma , author N. Spiridis , author K. Freindl , author J. Korecki , author W. Janus , author H. Nayyef , author P. Drozdz , author M. Slezak , author M. Zajac , \ and\ author T. Slezak ,\ 10.1063/5.0082729 journal journal Applied ...

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    Białek , author J

    author author M. Białek , author J. Zhang , author H. Yu , \ and\ author J.-P. \ Ansermet ,\ 10.1063/5.0094868 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 121 ,\ pages 032401 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0094...

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    @noop note See Supplemental Material at [URL-will-be-inserted-by-publisher] for full data sets of measured loops and results from other substrates and orientations, thickness results from X-ray reflectivity, exponential decay parameters for the coercive field and exchange bias...

  66. [74]

    author author S. S. \ Fields , author P. G. \ Callahan , author N. G. \ Combs , author C. D. \ Cress , \ and\ author S. P. \ Bennett ,\ 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00271 journal journal Crystal Growth & Design \ volume 24 ,\ pages 4604 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Hohenberg \ and\ author W

    author author P. Hohenberg \ and\ author W. Kohn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 136 ,\ pages B864 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  68. [76]

    Kohn \ and\ author L

    author author W. Kohn \ and\ author L. J. \ Sham ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 140 ,\ pages A1133 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  69. [77]

    Kresse \ and\ author J

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author J. Furthm\"uller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 11169 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  70. [78]

    Kresse \ and\ author D

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author D. Joubert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1758 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  71. [79]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke , \ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  72. [80]

    Choudhary \ and\ author K

    author author K. Choudhary \ and\ author K. F. \ Garrity ,\ 10.1039/D4DD00031E journal journal Digital Discovery \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1365 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Choudhary , author K

    author author K. Choudhary , author K. F. \ Garrity , author A. C. \ Reid , author B. DeCost , author A. J. \ Biacchi , author A. R. \ Hight Walker , author Z. Trautt , author J. Hattrick-Simpers , author A. G. \ Kusne , author A. Centrone , author A. Davydov , \ and\ author F...

    2020

  74. [82]

    Wines , author R

    author author D. Wines , author R. Gurunathan , author K. F. \ Garrity , author B. DeCost , author A. J. \ Biacchi , author F. Tavazza , \ and\ author K. Choudhary ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 10 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  75. [83]

    Zhang , author Y

    author author X. Zhang , author Y. Lao , author J. Sklenar , author N. S. \ Bingham , author J. T. \ Batley , author J. D. \ Watts , author C. Nisoli , author C. Leighton , \ and\ author P. Schiffer ,\ @noop journal journal APL Materials \ volume 7 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.