Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 2 minor 68 references

The paper claims that pancreatic duct pressure — the quantity thought to drive pain in chronic pancreatitis — can be estimated non-invasively from MRCP imaging and computational flow modeling, replacing invasive ERCP catheter measurements.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

A computational model estimates pancreatic duct pressure non-invasively from MRCP geometry, with reported agreement against ERCP pressure measurements.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Abstract-only review: the pancreatic duct pressure idea is promising and plausible, but the attached full text is a different paper and the abstract lacks the quantitative validation details needed to trust the 'strong correlation' claims. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.15163 v1 pith:ZA7FNKJZ submitted 2025-08-21 physics.med-ph

Non-invasive Assessment of Pancreatic Duct Hypertension Using Computational Flow Modeling

classification physics.med-ph
keywords pancreatic duct hypertensionpancreatic duct pressurechronic pancreatitisMRCPcomputational fluid dynamicsERCPquasi-one-dimensional modelnon-invasive diagnosis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that pancreatic duct pressure — the quantity thought to drive pain in chronic pancreatitis — can be estimated non-invasively from MRCP imaging and computational flow modeling, replacing invasive ERCP catheter measurements. The authors build patient-specific three-dimensional ductal models from MRCP data and simulate intraductal pressure distributions with computational fluid dynamics. They report that the simulated pressure gradients correlate strongly with in vivo ERCP measurements and with clinical outcomes such as pain relief after ductal decompression. They also present a simplified quasi-one-dimensional analytical model that predicts pressure from ductal geometry and flow parameters, matching the full CFD results. If these claims hold, MRCP-based pressure estimation would become a practical diagnostic tool for detecting pancreatic duct hypertension and guiding treatment decisions in chronic pancreatitis.

Core claim

The central claim is that pancreatic ductal hypertension can be diagnosed non-invasively by combining magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The authors reconstruct patient-specific three-dimensional ductal geometries from MRCP scans and simulate intraductal pressure distributions, reporting that the computed pressure gradients match invasive ERCP measurements and clinical outcomes. They then reduce the full three-dimensional simulation to a quasi-one-dimensional analytical model that takes ductal geometry and flow parameters as inputs and reproduces the CFD pressure predictions. The paper's stated discovery is the feasibility and clinical

What carries the argument

The approach rests on two linked components: patient-specific three-dimensional ductal geometry reconstructed from MRCP imaging, which provides anatomical fidelity for the flow simulation, and a computational fluid dynamics model that computes the intraductal pressure distribution. The clinically usable vehicle is the quasi-one-dimensional analytical model, which predicts pancreatic duct pressure directly from ductal geometry and assumed flow parameters; the 3D CFD simulation serves as the accuracy reference against which the reduced model is validated.

Load-bearing premise

The estimate assumes MRCP-derived duct geometry plus assumed flow parameters (pancreatic juice flow rate, viscosity, duct wall compliance) are sufficient to reproduce true intraductal pressures, with ERCP pressure measurement treated as the ground truth.

What would settle it

A prospective cohort where ERCP catheter pressure is measured during the same session as MRCP: if the CFD or quasi-1D-model pressure predictions, generated without knowledge of the catheter readings, fail to reproduce measured pressures to clinical accuracy—or if physiological variations in assumed flow rate and viscosity swing the predicted pressure enough to change treatment decisions—the central claim is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Non-invasive pancreatic duct pressure estimation could become a routine part of chronic pancreatitis workup, identifying candidates for ductal decompression without an invasive ERCP.
  • Repeated MRCP-based pressure estimates could let clinicians track pressure changes over time and after therapy, enabling longitudinal monitoring of disease progression.
  • The quasi-one-dimensional model could be embedded in radiology software to generate pressure estimates directly from MRCP-derived duct geometry, cutting computational cost enough for clinical use.
  • If pressures can be estimated reliably, diagnostic ERCPs performed purely to measure pressure could be reserved for interventions, reducing procedural risk for patients.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometry-plus-flow framework could plausibly extend to other ductal systems where pressure matters, such as the bile duct or salivary ducts, though the paper does not claim this.
  • To guide therapy, a clinically validated pressure threshold for 'hypertension' would need to be established from larger outcome-linked cohorts; the abstract does not state such a threshold.
  • The reported correlation between pressure estimates and pain relief after decompression suggests pressure contributes to pain, but whether it is the sole driver remains untested; other ductal or parenchymal factors could be involved.
  • A natural prospective test is to post MRCP-based predictions before ERCP and compare them with catheter readings, which would show whether the parameter-fitting generalizes beyond the cohort used in this study.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission under review consists of an abstract for a physics/med-ph paper proposing non-invasive pancreatic duct pressure (PDP) estimation from MRCP-derived duct geometry combined with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), plus a quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) analytical model. The abstract claims strong correlation between simulated pressure gradients and in-vivo ERCP measurements, as well as with clinical outcomes such as pain relief after ductal decompression, and strong concordance between the Q1D model and CFD. However, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.15169, an unrelated computer-vision paper on city mesh-guided outdoor scene generation (MeSS). No methods, equations, boundary conditions, patient data, statistical analyses, or validation details for the described pancreatic study are present in the submission. Consequently, the central claims cannot be inspected or verified from the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the claims were substantiated, the proposed MRCP-based PDP estimation could address a real clinical need by replacing invasive ERCP pressure measurements in chronic pancreatitis. The potential significance is therefore genuine. However, the current submission provides only an abstract-level assertion; no quantitative correlations, sample sizes, parameter sets, or governing equations are available. The claimed Q1D-vs-CFD concordance, even if established, would only demonstrate that the reduced model reproduces the CFD physics; it would not independently validate the physiological assumptions embedded in the CFD model. As submitted, the manuscript does not provide enough evidence to assess feasibility, accuracy, or generalizability of the method.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text] The full text supplied with the submission is arXiv:2508.15169, a computer-vision paper titled 'MeSS: City Mesh-Guided Outdoor Scene Generation,' which is unrelated to the pancreatic duct hypertension study described in the abstract. None of the methods, governing equations, boundary conditions, mesh generation, CFD solver, or Q1D model derivations are available. This is a load-bearing integrity issue: the manuscript cannot be scientifically reviewed in this state.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that simulated pressure gradients showed 'strong correlation' with ERCP measurements and 'strong concordance' with CFD results, but reports no correlation coefficients, R² values, limits of agreement, sample sizes, patient demographics, or statistical significance. Without these, the strength of the claimed associations cannot be evaluated. The clinical outcome 'pain relief following ductal decompression' is also undefined in terms of measurement instrument and follow-up interval.
  3. [Abstract, parameter provenance] The method depends on unstated physiological parameters: pancreatic juice flow rate, fluid viscosity, and duct wall compliance. The abstract does not indicate whether these are measured, taken from literature, or fitted to the ERCP pressure outcomes. If any of these parameters were calibrated against the same pressure values used for validation, the reported correlation would be partly circular. A clear calibration/validation split with pre-specified parameters or independent measurement is required.
  4. [Q1D model validation] The abstract's supporting claim that the quasi-one-dimensional model shows 'strong concordance' with CFD tests only validates the reduced-order approximation against the same computational framework; it does not validate the underlying physiological model against ground-truth pressures. Independent validation of the Q1D model against ERCP measurements is needed, along with uncertainty quantification that propagates geometric segmentation error and parameter uncertainty into PDP estimates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not state the number of patients or ducts analyzed, the range of pancreatic duct pressures encountered, or the criteria for selecting subjects. Reporting these would greatly improve interpretability.
  2. [General] The title, abstract, and full text belong to different papers. If an administrative error occurred in assembling the submission, a corrected version with the actual methods and results must be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified in the abstract-level evidence; the Q1D–CFD agreement is a model-reduction consistency check and the ERCP correlation is external validation.

full rationale

The only text belonging to arXiv:2508.15163 that is available for inspection is the abstract; the supplied full text is a different manuscript (arXiv:2508.15169, a city-scene generation paper), so no governing equations, boundary conditions, or parameter-calibration statements can be examined. On the abstract alone, no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs. The simulated pressure gradients are compared with independent in vivo ERCP measurements and clinical outcomes; this is external validation, not a circular fit. The quasi-1D model's 'strong concordance with CFD results' is an internal model-reduction consistency test: both the CFD and the Q1D model are forward solutions from ductal geometry and flow parameters, and the abstract does not state that these parameters were fitted to the ERCP pressures or to the CFD outputs. Therefore no 'fitted input called prediction' or 'self-definitional' reduction can be exhibited. The mismatch between the claimed paper and the supplied full text is a serious verification gap, but it is a completeness problem, not a circularity problem.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on several unstated modeling assumptions and fitted or assumed flow parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The abstract provides no quantitative validation details, so the ledger is based on what is implied by the method description.

free parameters (4)
  • Pancreatic juice flow rate = Not reported
    Used as a boundary condition in the CFD model; the abstract does not state whether it was measured, assumed, or fitted.
  • Fluid viscosity = Not reported
    Required for Navier-Stokes or Poiseuille-like calculations; value is not given.
  • Duct wall compliance or rigidity = Not reported
    The modeling of the duct wall affects the pressure distribution; no compliance model is described in the abstract.
  • Q1D model coefficients = Not reported
    If the quasi-one-dimensional model is calibrated to match CFD results, these coefficients are fitted parameters rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption MRCP-derived duct geometry accurately represents the in vivo dimensions and shape of the pancreatic duct.
    The entire method relies on the reconstruction being anatomically faithful; the abstract does not provide validation of segmentation accuracy.
  • domain assumption ERCP pressure measurement is a valid and reliable ground truth for pancreatic duct pressure.
    The correlation claim assumes that the invasive measurement is the reference standard, but ERCP itself may disturb the duct and alter pressures.
  • domain assumption Flow in the pancreatic duct can be modeled with standard fluid mechanics assumptions such as laminar, incompressible flow.
    The CFD and Q1D models implicitly rely on these assumptions; the abstract does not state or justify them.
  • ad hoc to paper The flow parameters used in the simulation are known or can be estimated without direct measurement.
    The abstract does not state where flow rate and viscosity come from; if they are adjusted to match pressure outcomes, the validation would be partially circular.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-invasive Assessment of Pancreatic Duct Hypertension Using Computational Flow Modeling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZA7FNKJZ

@misc{pith2026250815163,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-invasive Assessment of Pancreatic Duct Hypertension Using Computational Flow Modeling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZA7FNKJZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15163}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive inflammatory disease frequently associated with severe, treatment-resistant abdominal pain, which is hypothesized to result from pancreatic ductal hypertension (PDH) secondary to ductal strictures or obstructions. However, direct measurement of pancreatic duct pressure (PDP) remains technically demanding and invasive, thereby significantly limiting its routine clinical application. Here, we propose and validate a novel, non-invasive approach for estimating PDP. The method integrates patient-specific magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Three-dimensional ductal models reconstructed from MRCP data enabled simulation of intraductal pressure distributions with high anatomical fidelity. The simulated pressure gradients showed strong correlation with in vivo measurements obtained via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), as well as with clinical outcomes such as pain relief following ductal decompression. To improve clinical usability, we developed a quasi-one-dimensional analytical model that accurately predicted PDP from ductal geometry and flow parameters, showing strong concordance with CFD results. These findings establish the feasibility and clinical relevance of MRCP-based PDP estimation, and underscore its potential as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for detecting PDH and informing therapeutic decisions in patients with CP.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14492 (2025)

    Alhaija, H.A., Alvarez, J., Bala, M., Cai, T., Cao, T., Cha, L., Chen, J., Chen, M., Ferroni, F., Fidler, S., et al.: Cosmos-transfer1: Conditional world generation with adaptive multimodal control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14492 (2025)

  2. [2]

    In: CVPR (2025)

    Asim, M., Wewer, C., Wimmer, T., Schiele, B., Lenssen, J.E.: MEt3R: Measuring multi-view consistency in generated images. In: CVPR (2025)

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12288 (2023)

    Bhat, S.F., Birkl, R., Wofk, D., Wonka, P., M¨ uller, M.: Zoedepth: Zero-shot transfer by combining relative and metric depth. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12288 (2023)

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 (2023)

    Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Kulal, S., Mendelevitch, D., Kilian, M., Lorenz, D., Levi, Y., English, Z., Voleti, V., Letts, A., et al.: Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 (2023)

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02073 (2024)

    Bochkovskii, A., Delaunoy, A., Germain, H., Santos, M., Zhou, Y., Richter, S.R., Koltun, V.: Depth pro: Sharp monocular metric depth in less than a second. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02073 (2024)

  6. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Cai, S., Chan, E.R., Peng, S., Shahbazi, M., Obukhov, A., Van Gool, L., Wetzstein, G.: Diffdreamer: Towards consistent unsupervised single-view scene extrapolation with conditional diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 2139–2150 (2023)

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chai, L., Tucker, R., Li, Z., Isola, P., Snavely, N.: Persistent nature: A generative model of unbounded 3d worlds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 20863–20874 (2023)

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Chen, D.Z., Li, H., Lee, H.Y., Tulyakov, S., Nießner, M.: Scenetex: High-quality texture synthesis for indoor scenes via diffusion priors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 21081– 21091 (2024)

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Chen, D.Z., Siddiqui, Y., Lee, H.Y., Tulyakov, S., Nießner, M.: Text2tex: Text- driven texture synthesis via diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 18558–18568 (2023) 22 X. Chen et al

  10. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Chen, R., Chen, Y., Jiao, N., Jia, K.: Fantasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high-quality text-to-3d content creation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 22246–22256 (2023)

  11. [11]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (2023)

    Chen, Z., Wang, G., Liu, Z.: Scenedreamer: Unbounded 3d scene generation from 2d image collections. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (2023)

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13384 (2023)

    Chung, J., Lee, S., Nam, H., Lee, J., Lee, K.M.: Luciddreamer: Domain-free gen- eration of 3d gaussian splatting scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13384 (2023)

  13. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Deitke, M., Schwenk, D., Salvador, J., Weihs, L., Michel, O., VanderBilt, E., Schmidt, L., Ehsani, K., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A.: Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 13142–13153 (2023)

  14. [14]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers

    Deng, B., Tucker, R., Li, Z., Guibas, L., Snavely, N., Wetzstein, G.: Streetscapes: Large-scale consistent street view generation using autoregressive video diffusion. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers. pp. 1–11 (2024)

  15. [15]

    Advances in neural information processing systems34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural information processing systems34, 8780–8794 (2021)

  16. [16]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association106(496), 1602–1614 (2011)

    Efron, B.: Tweedie’s formula and selection bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association106(496), 1602–1614 (2011)

  17. [17]

    https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/ unreal-engine-5 (2021), accessed: 2025-08-01

    Epic Games: Unreal engine 5. https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/ unreal-engine-5 (2021), accessed: 2025-08-01

  18. [18]

    https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/ en-US/product/city-sample (2022), accessed: 2025-08-01

    Epic Games: City sample project. https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/ en-US/product/city-sample (2022), accessed: 2025-08-01

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20309 (2024)

    Fan, Z., Wen, K., Cong, W., Wang, K., Zhang, J., Ding, X., Xu, D., Ivanovic, B., Pavone, M., Pavlakos, G., et al.: Instantsplat: Sparse-view sfm-free gaussian splatting in seconds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20309 (2024)

  20. [20]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 39897–39914 (2023)

    Fridman, R., Abecasis, A., Kasten, Y., Dekel, T.: Scenescape: Text-driven con- sistent scene generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 39897–39914 (2023)

  21. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 91560–91596 (2025)

    Gao, S., Yang, J., Chen, L., Chitta, K., Qiu, Y., Geiger, A., Zhang, J., Li, H.: Vista: A generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile controllability. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 91560–91596 (2025)

  22. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques

    Garland, M., Heckbert, P.S.: Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. pp. 209–216 (1997)

  23. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Gu´ edon, A., Lepetit, V.: Sugar: Surface-aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3d mesh reconstruction and high-quality mesh rendering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 5354– 5363 (2024)

  24. [24]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 36664–36676 (2023)

    Guo, Y., Zuo, X., Dai, P., Lu, J., Wu, X., Yan, Y., Xu, S., Wu, X., et al.: Deco- rate3d: text-driven high-quality texture generation for mesh decoration in the wild. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 36664–36676 (2023)

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725 (2023)

    Guo, Y., Yang, C., Rao, A., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y., Agrawala, M., Lin, D., Dai, B.: Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725 (2023)

  26. [26]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Hong, S., Lee, K., Jeon, S.Y., Bae, H., Chun, S.Y.: On exact inversion of DPM- solvers. In: CVPR (2024)

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition

    Ke, B., Obukhov, A., Huang, S., Metzger, N., Daudt, R.C., Schindler, K.: Re- purposing diffusion-based image generators for monocular depth estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition. pp. 9492–9502 (2024) MeSS: Mesh-Guided Outdoor Scene Generation 23

  28. [28]

    ACM Trans

    Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimk¨ uhler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph.42(4), 139–1 (2023)

  29. [29]

    In: ICML (2025)

    Koo, G., Yoon, S., Lee, Y., Hong, J.W., Yoo, C.D.: Flowdrag: Mesh-guided drag- based image editing with deformation vector flow fields. In: ICML (2025)

  30. [30]

    https://metaver.de/trefferanzeige?docuuid= B438AD57-223B-43A4-8E74-767CEC8A96D7 (2025), cityGML dataset, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung 2.0

    Landesbetrieb Geoinformation und Vermessung Hamburg: 3D- Geb¨ audemodell LoD3.0-HH. https://metaver.de/trefferanzeige?docuuid= B438AD57-223B-43A4-8E74-767CEC8A96D7 (2025), cityGML dataset, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung 2.0. Last updated April 2025

  31. [31]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Li, X., Zhang, Y., Ye, X.: Drivingdiffusion: Layout-guided multi-view driving sce- narios video generation with latent diffusion model. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 469–485. Springer (2024)

  32. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Li, Y., Jiang, L., Xu, L., Xiangli, Y., Wang, Z., Lin, D., Dai, B.: Matrixcity: A large-scale city dataset for city-scale neural rendering and beyond. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 3205–3215 (2023)

  33. [33]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Li, Z., Wang, Q., Snavely, N., Kanazawa, A.: Infinitenature-zero: Learning perpet- ual view generation of natural scenes from single images. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 515–534. Springer (2022)

  34. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision

    Lin, C.H., Lee, H.Y., Menapace, W., Chai, M., Siarohin, A., Yang, M.H., Tulyakov, S.: Infinicity: Infinite-scale city synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 22808–22818 (2023)

  35. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Liu, A., Tucker, R., Jampani, V., Makadia, A., Snavely, N., Kanazawa, A.: Infi- nite nature: Perpetual view generation of natural scenes from a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 14458–14467 (2021)

  36. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16767 (2024)

    Liu, F., Sun, W., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Sun, H., Ye, J., Zhang, J., Duan, Y.: Reconx: Reconstruct any scene from sparse views with video diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16767 (2024)

  37. [37]

    CoRR (2025)

    Liu, Y., Luo, C., Tang, Z., Li, Y., Yang, Y., Ning, Y., Fan, L., Zhang, Z., Peng, J.: Tc-light: Temporally coherent generative rendering for realistic world transfer. CoRR (2025)

  38. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lugmayr, A., Danelljan, M., Romero, A., Yu, F., Timofte, R., Van Gool, L.: Re- paint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11461– 11471 (2022)

  39. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04378 (2023)

    Luo, S., Tan, Y., Huang, L., Li, J., Zhao, H.: Latent consistency mod- els: Synthesizing high-resolution images with few-step inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04378 (2023)

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05556 (2023)

    Luo, S., Tan, Y., Patil, S., Gu, D., von Platen, P., Pasber, A., Huang, L., Li, J., Zhao, H.: Lcm-lora: A universal stable-diffusion acceleration module. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05556 (2023)

  41. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073 (2021)

    Meng, C., He, Y., Song, Y., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.Y., Ermon, S.: Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073 (2021)

  42. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Metzer, G., Richardson, E., Patashnik, O., Giryes, R., Cohen-Or, D.: Latent-nerf for shape-guided generation of 3d shapes and textures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12663– 12673 (2023) 24 X. Chen et al

  43. [43]

    Commu- nications of the ACM65(1), 99–106 (2021)

    Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Commu- nications of the ACM65(1), 99–106 (2021)

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00062 (2025)

    NVIDIA: World simulation with video foundation models for physical ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00062 (2025)

  45. [45]

    https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.21-00032R2

    Peters, R., Dukai, B., Vitalis, S., van Liempt, J., Stoter, J.: Automated 3d recon- struction of lod2 and lod1 models for all 10 million buildings of the netherlands (2022). https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.21-00032R2

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

    Poole, B., Jain, A., Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B.: Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

  47. [47]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence44(3), 1623–1637 (2020)

    Ranftl, R., Lasinger, K., Hafner, D., Schindler, K., Koltun, V.: Towards robust monocular depth estimation: Mixing datasets for zero-shot cross-dataset transfer. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence44(3), 1623–1637 (2020)

  48. [48]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 conference proceedings

    Richardson, E., Metzer, G., Alaluf, Y., Giryes, R., Cohen-Or, D.: Texture: Text- guided texturing of 3d shapes. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 conference proceedings. pp. 1–11 (2023)

  49. [49]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 10684– 10695 (June 2022)

  50. [50]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and ma- chine intelligence45(4), 4713–4726 (2022)

    Saharia, C., Ho, J., Chan, W., Salimans, T., Fleet, D.J., Norouzi, M.: Image super- resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and ma- chine intelligence45(4), 4713–4726 (2022)

  51. [51]

    https://github.com/savenow/ lod3-road-space-models (2020)

    SA VeNoW, P.: Lod3 road space models. https://github.com/savenow/ lod3-road-space-models (2020)

  52. [52]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Shi, Y., Xue, C., Liew, J.H., Pan, J., Yan, H., Zhang, W., Tan, V.Y.F., Bai, S.: Dragdiffusion: Harnessing diffusion models for interactive point-based image edit- ing. In: CVPR (2024)

  53. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04928 (2024)

    Sun, W., Chen, S., Liu, F., Chen, Z., Duan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.: Dimensionx: Create any 3d and 4d scenes from a single image with controllable video diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04928 (2024)

  54. [54]

    TUM2Twin Project: TUM2Twin: Digital twin of TU Munich (lod2/lod3) (2025)

  55. [55]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13389 (2024)

    Viola, M., Qu, K., Metzger, N., Ke, B., Becker, A., Schindler, K., Obukhov, A.: Marigold-dc: Zero-shot monocular depth completion with guided diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13389 (2024)

  56. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16892 (2024)

    Wang, H., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Dong, Z., Yang, B.: Vistadream: Sampling multiview consistent images for single-view scene reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16892 (2024)

  57. [57]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Huang, G., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Lu, J.: Drivedreamer: Towards real-world-drive world models for autonomous driving. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 55–72. Springer (2024)

  58. [58]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 8406–8441 (2023)

    Wang, Z., Lu, C., Wang, Y., Bao, F., Li, C., Su, H., Zhu, J.: Prolificdreamer: High-fidelity and diverse text-to-3d generation with variational score distillation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 8406–8441 (2023)

  59. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Xie, H., Chen, Z., Hong, F., Liu, Z.: Citydreamer: Compositional generative model of unbounded 3d cities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 9666–9675 (2024)

  60. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06526 (2024) MeSS: Mesh-Guided Outdoor Scene Generation 25

    Xie, H., Chen, Z., Hong, F., Liu, Z.: Gaussiancity: Generative gaussian splatting for unbounded 3d city generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06526 (2024) MeSS: Mesh-Guided Outdoor Scene Generation 25

  61. [61]

    Xie, H., Chen, Z., Hong, F., Liu, Z.: Citydreamer4d: Compositional generative model of unbounded 4d cities (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08983

  62. [62]

    Chair of Geoinformatics, Technical University of Munich (2025), version 5.0, https://www.3dcitydb.org/

    Yao, Z., Chaturvedi, K., Kolbe, T.H.: 3DCityDBV5: Open Source 3D City Database for CityGML. Chair of Geoinformatics, Technical University of Munich (2025), version 5.0, https://www.3dcitydb.org/

  63. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09394 (2024)

    Yu, H.X., Duan, H., Herrmann, C., Freeman, W.T., Wu, J.: Wonderworld: Inter- active 3d scene generation from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09394 (2024)

  64. [64]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Yu, H.X., Duan, H., Hur, J., Sargent, K., Rubinstein, M., Freeman, W.T., Cole, F., Sun, D., Snavely, N., Wu, J., et al.: Wonderjourney: Going from anywhere to everywhere. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 6658–6667 (2024)

  65. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02048 (2024)

    Yu, W., Xing, J., Yuan, L., Hu, W., Li, X., Huang, Z., Gao, X., Wong, T.T., Shan, Y., Tian, Y.: Viewcrafter: Taming video diffusion models for high-fidelity novel view synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02048 (2024)

  66. [66]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Zhang, L., Rao, A., Agrawala, M.: Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 3836–3847 (2023)

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06845 (2024)

    Zhao, G., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Huang, G., Bao, X., Wang, X.: Drivedreamer-2: Llm-enhanced world models for diverse driving video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06845 (2024)

  68. [68]

    https://github.com/ydrive/EasySynth (2024), gitHub repository, accessed: 2025-08-01

    Zhao, Y., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Zhao, H.: Easysynth: A unified toolkit for generating multi-modal synthetic data. https://github.com/ydrive/EasySynth (2024), gitHub repository, accessed: 2025-08-01

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.