Octahedral tilting and B-site off-centering in halide perovskites are not coupled

Colin M. Hylton-Farrington; Richard C. Remsing

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Octahedral tilting and B-site off-centering in halide perovskites are not coupled

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In cubic CsBBr3 (B = Pb, Sn, Ge), the off-centering of the metal ion and the tilting of its halide octahedra are decoupled by symmetry, with the B–halide bond stiffness, not the lone pair, controlling tilting.

desk verdict Decoupling claim is clean and largely supported, but the load-bearing [111] assumption is inferred from WFCs, not nuclear displacements; revise before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15607 v1 pith:W7URXTXE submitted 2025-08-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Colin M. Hylton-Farrington , Richard C. Remsing This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

keywords halideperovskitesoctahedraltiltingB-siteoff-centeringlonepairstereochemistrysymmetrymodedecouplingabinitiomoleculardynamicsWannierfunctionsrotororderparameters

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Metal halide perovskites owe many of their useful properties to local distortions, but which distortion causes which effect has been hard to untangle. This paper argues that two of the most discussed distortions—the off-centering of the metal cation inside its halide octahedron and the collective tilting of those octahedra—are independent of each other in cubic CsBBr3 (B = Pb, Sn, Ge). Using ab initio molecular dynamics and symmetry-based measures, the authors show that lone-pair activity grows from Pb to Ge and drives off-centering, yet it does not correlate with tilting in the simulated trajectories. What does correlate is the stiffness of the B–halide bond: the same s–p mixing that produces the lone pair also creates a partial covalent bond that resists octahedral rotation. If correct, this separates two previously conflated instabilities and points to bond stiffness, not lone-pair strength, as the lever for controlling tilting-related disorder.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotor function M^{ℓ,m}_ξ, an order parameter that measures how well a collection of vectors (B–Br bonds, or B-site-to-Wannier-center dipoles) is oriented according to a symmetry-adapted function of the site symmetry; it reports the overlap of local nuclear and electronic structure with a given irreducible representation. The paper uses M4,4_K for octahedral tilting (T1g) and lower-order rotors for lone-pair dipole rotation, together with maximally localized Wannier function centers as point proxies for the electron density. These objects make the symmetry argument concrete: because tilting and [111] off-centering belong to different irreps, correlations between thei

What would settle it

A direct falsifier is an AIMD run on CsPbBr3 or CsGeBr3 in which the B-site displacement vector is decomposed into components along the [111] and [100] axes before correlation with the tilting order parameter M4,4_K: the paper's claim predicts the [111] component is uncorrelated with tilting while the [100] component is allowed to correlate. A positive conditional correlation for the [111] component, or a significant population of [100] displacements that fail to couple, would overturn the symmetry-decoupling picture. Experimentally, pair-distribution or diffuse-scattering analysis that resolv

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that instantaneous B-site off-centering and octahedral tilting are symmetry-decoupled in the cubic phase. Tilting is a collective rotation of the octahedron that transforms the B-site environment according to the T1g symmetry type (monitored by the rotor function M4,4_K), while the dominant off-centering is a [111] shift that lowers the B-site symmetry from Oh to C3v; these two transformations have incommensurate symmetries and cannot hybridize. Conditional averages computed from AIMD trajectories of CsPbBr3, CsSnBr3, and CsGeBr3 show essentially no correlation between either lone-pair expression or off-centering and the tilting order parameter, even though lone-

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the metal ion's off-center motion is mostly a shift toward the face of its octahedron, not toward an edge or corner; if a substantial share of shifts were instead toward an edge or corner, that part would be allowed to couple to tilting and the reported null correlation would need a different explanation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In a perovskite with strong B–halide bonding (Ge), octahedral tilting modes stiffen and lone-pair reorientation slows to tens of picoseconds; with weak bonding (Pb), tilting is soft and the cation rattles rapidly between off-center configurations.
Because tilting and off-centering transform under different irreps, they cannot constructively hybridize; their coexistence in experiments reflects two competing order parameters rather than one cooperative distortion.
A B-site electron density that is purely dipolar behaves as a spectator to tilting; to make electronic symmetry actively control tilting, the B-site density must carry higher multipoles (e.g., a hexadecapole, ℓ = 4), as might be introduced with f-electron cations.
Tuning halide identity or aliovalent doping should shift the balance between off-centering and tilt stiffness in predictable ways through changes in s–p mixing and electron localization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension not explored in the paper is to decompose the B-site displacement vector into its [111] and [100] components and repeat the conditional-correlation analysis; the paper's symmetry argument predicts the [100] component is the one allowed to couple to tilting, so that decomposition would sharpen the claim.
If the decoupling is generic, then optical signatures usually attributed to tilting (e.g., Urbach energy fluctuations) might instead track the B–halide bond stiffness, so comparing a lone-pair-free analog with matched bond stiffness would separate the two mechanisms.
The competition picture implies that strain or pressure, by changing bond lengths and s–p mixing, could flip a perovskite from a tilting-dominated to an off-centering-dominated regime; this is testable with AIMD at different lattice constants.
The paper's own time-correlation data suggest a dynamic asymmetry: tilting relaxes on sub-picosecond scales while Ge lone-pair orientation relaxes on tens-of-picoseconds scales, so any experiment probing local dynamics should see two well-separated time constants in CsGeBr3.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the take: this is a worthwhile simulation paper with a clean symmetry argument and honest fluctuation analysis, but the headline "not coupled" is a little ahead of the evidence. The key gap is that the symmetry argument assumes off-centering is along [111], yet the paper never directly measures the direction of the B-site displacement. It shows the WFC dipole points along [111], but that's electronic, not nuclear.

What's genuinely new: the fluctuation-level demonstration that chi_rdip(M4,4_K) and chi_roct(M4,4_K) are near zero in the controlled same-L comparison, and the explanation that lone pair activity correlates with tilt only through the Br-B bond stiffness. The T1g vs T1u argument is textbook for oxides, but applying it to the instantaneous fluctuations in halide perovskites and tying it to WFC multipoles is a real step. No fitting anywhere, direct observables, and the f-electron prediction for Eu2+/Yb2+ is a crisp falsifiable design rule.

Where it's soft: first, the off-centering direction. The scalar roct can't tell [111] from [100], and P(Omega) of the ML WFC is not the nuclear displacement. If any appreciable fraction of instantaneous displacements has [100] character, the coupling channel you yourself identified as allowed is no longer forbidden, and your null would need another explanation. That's a load-bearing assumption, not a minor detail—though easily fixable by reporting the angular distribution of r_B - r_oct. Second, the bond-stiffening mechanism is qualitative: WF isosurfaces and Br WFC orientations suggest it, but there's no quantitative handle connecting bond strength to tilt-mode frequency. Third, the Ge TCF decays on tens of ps while the controlled trajectory is 60 ps; that needs longer runs or error bars to be persuasive.

None of this sinks the paper. The symmetry argument is correct for the [111] channel, and the observed null is consistent with it. But the title should be tempered to "not coupled for [111] off-centering" until the displacement direction is measured.

Who benefits: anyone working on halide perovskite lattice dynamics, lone pair stereochemistry, or thermal transport. Worth brooming to peer review—send it out, but ask for the displacement-direction analysis and a longer Ge trajectory before acceptance.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses DFT-based AIMD trajectories of cubic CsBBr3 (B = Pb, Sn, Ge), including a control set at a common lattice constant and temperature, to ask whether B-site lone-pair expression, B-site off-centering, and octahedral tilting are dynamically coupled. It quantifies lone-pair expression by the B–ML WFC distance rdip, off-centering by the scalar roct, and tilting by the T1g rotor function M4,4_K. The main claims are: (i) lone-pair expression is correlated with off-centering; (ii) neither is correlated with instantaneous tilting, as shown by the conditional averages chi_rdip(M4,4_K) and chi_roct(M4,4_K); (iii) this null is explained by symmetry—[111] off-centering transforms as T1u and cannot linearly couple to the T1g tilting coordinate, whereas [100] off-centering could; and (iv) the observed Pb→Sn→Ge stiffening of tilting is caused by increasing partial covalent Br–B bonding, inferred from ML WF isosurfaces and bromide ML WFC orientation distributions.

Significance. If correct, the symmetry-decoupling result is a significant conceptual advance: it contradicts the common assumption that stereochemically active lone pairs directly promote octahedral tilting, and it offers a concrete design rule (a B-site density with hexadecapole/T1g overlap would be required for direct coupling). The analysis is parameter-free and based on direct simulation observables; no fitting is introduced, and the symmetry argument is clean and checkable. The dynamic competition picture and the falsifiable predictions for f-electron B-site cations are useful and extend the work beyond the three materials studied. The main reservations concern the unverified structural premise for the symmetry argument and the qualitative nature of the bond-stiffness mechanism.

major comments (2)

[RESULTS — off-centering symmetry premise (Eq. 2, Figs. 2d/3)] The decoupling claim rests on the premise that the sampled B-site off-centering mode is along [111]. The manuscript supports this only with P(Ω) of the B–ML WFC dipole (Fig. 3), which reports the lone-pair orientation, not the nuclear displacement vector r_B − r_oct. Because roct in Eq. (2) is a scalar, it cannot distinguish [111] from [100] displacements, and the paper itself states that [100] off-centering is allowed to couple to tilting. If a non-negligible fraction of instantaneous displacements is [100]-like, the symmetry argument does not apply to those configurations, and the near-zero χ_roct(M4,4_K) in Fig. 4c would require a different explanation. Please report the angular distribution of the B-site displacement vector relative to the local octahedral frame, or decompose the displacements into Oh→C3v and Oh→C4v components and examine their conditional covariances with M4,4_K. Th
[RESULTS — bond-stiffness mechanism (Fig. 5)] The explanation for why tilting decreases from Pb to Ge—stronger partial covalent Br–B bonding stiffening the tilt modes—is inferred qualitatively from ML WF isosurfaces and z-axis WFC peaks. The causal link between the WFC directionality and the tilt force constant is not demonstrated; alternative electronic-structure effects of s–p mixing are not isolated. The paper should at least quantify tilt-mode stiffness (for example, effective curvatures along M4,4_K or the M/R phonon frequencies) and correlate it with a scalar measure of Br–B bond directionality across the series. This is a central part of the paper's explanatory story, even though it does not by itself undermine the decoupling conclusion.

minor comments (4)

[RESULTS — conditional averages] Two figure references are off: 'we plot ... in Fig. 3' and 'χ_rdip(M4,4_K) and χ_roct(M4,4_K) in Fig. 3b,c' should refer to Fig. 4 and Fig. 4b,c. Please correct the cross-references.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption for Fig. 2a describes a CsPbBr3 snapshot but states 'In-plane bromides are connected to Sn with dashed cylinders.' The element label should be Pb for consistency.
[Eq. (3)] The definition ⟨x⟩ = ∫ dy ⟨x(y)⟩ = ∫ dy ∫ dx x P(x|y) omits the weighting by P(y). As written, it is not equal to the marginal average unless y is uniformly distributed. It should read ⟨x⟩ = ∫ dy P(y) ⟨x(y)⟩, or the intended empirical binning should be stated.
[Fig. 4c and Ge statistics] Because P(M4,4_K) for CsGeBr3 is much narrower than for Pb and Sn (Fig. 2b), the conditional average χ_roct(M4,4_K) for Ge is informative over only a limited tilt range. This caveat should be stated, or supplemented by the experimental-cell simulations where tilt fluctuations are larger.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the decoupling conclusion is independently supported by a parameter-free symmetry argument and direct simulation observables.

full rationale

The central claim that B-site off-centering and octahedral tilting are symmetry-decoupled rests on a parameter-free group-theoretic argument (a T1u dipole cannot linearly couple to a T1g tilt) and on direct AIMD observables: the rotor order parameter M4,4_K of Eq. (1), roct of Eq. (2), rdip, and the conditional averages chi of Eq. (3). None of these quantities is fitted, and none is defined in terms of the conclusion; the near-zero chi_roct(M4,4_K) is an empirical result, not a construction. The only self-citation is ref. [15] for the rotor-function/ML-WFC methodology, which is a method transfer and is independent support, not an imported result; it does not assume the decoupling. The [111] off-centering mode is taken from external experimental work (ref. [12]), and the paper's own P(Omega) measurement verifies the electronic WFC orientation, not the nuclear displacement direction. This is an evidential gap for the symmetry premise, but it is not a circular reduction: Eq. (2) defines roct independently, and the symmetry argument is stated from group theory rather than from the fit. Hence no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is short because the paper fits nothing: roct, rdip, M4,4_K, and the TCFs are direct observables. The load-bearing assumptions are (a) ML WFCs faithfully report lone pair expression, (b) the T1g rotor function captures tilting, (c) the structural off-centering is the [111] C3v mode, (d) PBE+D3 accuracy suffices for the trends, and (e) 60-260 ps trajectories sample the slow modes. No entities are invented; the Eu2+/Yb2+ suggestion is a symmetry-based prediction about existing ions.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Maximally localized Wannier function centers (ML WFCs) are a faithful point representation of local electron density, and the B-ML WFC dipole distance rdip quantifies lone pair expression.
All electronic-structure conclusions route through ML WFCs (results section, Fig. 1c); if WFC localization misassigns lone pair character, the correlation and symmetry claims built on rdip lose their foundation. Authors cite this approximation from their own prior work (refs 15, 31).
standard math Octahedral tilting at the B-site is correctly classified by the T1g rotor function M4,4_K built from B-Br vectors.
Standard group theory: tilting lowers the B-site environment from Oh to C4h and belongs to the T1g irrep; used to define the order parameter in Eq. 1 and Fig. 2b. This is from the authors' prior rotor-function framework (refs 15, 32, 33).
domain assumption The dominant off-centering displacement of the B-site is along [111] (Oh to C3v).
Taken from ref 12 (Fabini et al.) and from the measured [111] orientation of the B-ML WFC dipole (Fig. 3); the structural displacement direction itself is not reported. The [100] (C4v) mode is explicitly acknowledged to be allowed to couple to tilting, so the decoupling conclusion depends on the [111] assignment.
domain assumption PBE+D3, without spin-orbit coupling, at the stated supercell sizes, accurately captures the relative lone pair expression and tilt stiffness trends across Pb, Sn, Ge.
All conclusions are drawn from this electronic structure level (Simulation Details); SOC is omitted though it is notable in Pb and Sn halides, and PBE has known functional sensitivity for lone pair activity.
domain assumption The 4x4x4 supercell and trajectories of 60-260 ps sample the relevant fluctuations; the slow Ge lone pair rotation (tens of ps) is sufficiently sampled by 60 ps NVE runs.
Needed for the conditional correlations and TCFs to be converged; the paper's own Fig. 6b inset shows Cdip(t) for Ge decaying on a 50 ps window, comparable to the whole production trajectory for the controlled set.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Octahedral tilting and B-site off-centering in halide perovskites are not coupled." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7URXTXE

@misc{pith2026250815607,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Octahedral tilting and B-site off-centering in halide perovskites are not coupled},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7URXTXE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15607}
}

read the original abstract

Metal halide perovskites show exceptional potential for solar energy, thermoelectrics, catalysis, and other photochemical technologies, with performance rooted in electronic structure-driven properties. In ABX3 halide perovskites, localized and often aspherical local electron densities from B-site lone pairs or polarizable X- anions can distort the lattice. However, the links among electronic structure fluctuations and distortions like tilting of the BX6 octahedra and off-centering of the B-site from the center of its octahedron are not fully understood. Using group theory and ab initio molecular dynamics, we quantify how lone pairs, halide polarization, off-centering, and octahedral tilting interact in the cubic phase CsBBr3, with B = Pb, Sn, and Ge. We find that lone pair-induced off-centering and octahedral tilting are symmetry-decoupled. Instead, stereochemical lone pair expression of the B-site ion is correlated to octahedral tilting through the propensity of the B-site to form a transient, partial covalent bond with the surrounding halide ions that stiffens octahedral tilting modes. These results link local electronic asymmetry to structural fluctuations and suggest that dynamic modulation of electronic symmetry offers a pathway to control functional properties in halide perovskites.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Electronic Fluctuations and Ionic Dynamics in Molten Silver Iodide
physics.chem-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In molten silver iodide, directional electronic fluctuations of iodide ions enhance silver diffusion and leave iodide dynamics largely unaffected, as shown by comparing DFT, a machine learning potential, and a classic...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semiconductors,

Mohammad Ubaid, Paribesh Acharyya, Suneet K. Maha- rana, Kanishka Biswas, and Koushik Pal, “Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semiconductors,” Applied Physics Reviews 11 (2024), 10.1063/5.0227080

doi:10.1063/5.0227080 2024
[2]

Intrinsically ultralow thermal conductivity in ruddlesden-popper 2d perovskite cs(2)pbi(2)cl(2): Localized anharmonic vibrations and dynamic octahedral distortions,

P. Acharyya, T. Ghosh, K. Pal, K. Kundu, K. Singh Rana, J. Pandey, A. Soni, U. V. Wagh- mare, and K. Biswas, “Intrinsically ultralow thermal conductivity in ruddlesden-popper 2d perovskite cs(2)pbi(2)cl(2): Localized anharmonic vibrations and dynamic octahedral distortions,” J Am Chem Soc 142, 15595–15603 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells,

C. Eames, J. M. Frost, P. R. Barnes, B. C. O’Regan, A. Walsh, and M. S. Islam, “Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells,” Nat Commun 6, 7497 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

How lattice and charge fluctu- ations control carrier dynamics in halide perovskites,

M. Z. Mayers, L. Z. Tan, D. A. Egger, A. M. Rappe, and D. R. Reichman, “How lattice and charge fluctu- ations control carrier dynamics in halide perovskites,” Nano Lett 18, 8041–8046 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

Lone-pair stereo- chemistry induces ferroelectric distortion and the rashba 9 effect in inorganic halide perovskites,

Michael W. Swift and John L. Lyons, “Lone-pair stereo- chemistry induces ferroelectric distortion and the rashba 9 effect in inorganic halide perovskites,” Chemistry of Ma- terials 35, 9370–9377 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites,

Michael A Becker, Roman Vaxenburg, Georgian Nedelcu, Peter C Sercel, Andrew Shabaev, Michael J Mehl, John G Michopoulos, Samuel G Lambrakos, Noam Bernstein, John L Lyons, et al., “Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites,” Nature 553, 189–193 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Excitons and their fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals from atomistic gw/bse calculations,

Giulia Biffi, Yeongsu Cho, Roman Krahne, and Tim- othy C Berkelbach, “Excitons and their fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals from atomistic gw/bse calculations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, 1891–1898 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

Size-dependent lattice symmetry break- ing determines the exciton fine structure of perovskite nanocrystals,

Daniel Weinberg, Yoonjae Park, David T Limmer, and Eran Rabani, “Size-dependent lattice symmetry break- ing determines the exciton fine structure of perovskite nanocrystals,” Nano Letters 23, 4997–5003 (2023)

work page 2023

Show all 65 references

[9]

Theoretical insights into the role of lattice fluctuations on the excited behavior of lead halide perovskites,

Yoonjae Park, Rohit Rana, Daniel Chabeda, Eran Ra- bani, and David T Limmer, “Theoretical insights into the role of lattice fluctuations on the excited behavior of lead halide perovskites,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15632 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[10]

Cooperative octahedral tilt modes drive coexisting displacive and order–disorder pressure-induced phase transitions in mapbbr3,

Sayan Maity, Suraj Verma, Lavanya M. Ramaniah, and Varadharajan Srinivasan, “Cooperative octahedral tilt modes drive coexisting displacive and order–disorder pressure-induced phase transitions in mapbbr3,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 128, 8531–8539 (2024)

2024
[11]

Spontaneous octa- hedral tilting in the cubic inorganic cesium halide per- ovskites cssnx3 and cspbx3 (x= f, cl, br, i),

Ruo Xi Yang, Jonathan M Skelton, E Lora Da Silva, Jarvist M Frost, and Aron Walsh, “Spontaneous octa- hedral tilting in the cubic inorganic cesium halide per- ovskites cssnx3 and cspbx3 (x= f, cl, br, i),” The journal of physical chemistry letters 8, 4720–4726 (2017)

2017
[12]

Dynamic stereochemical activity of the sn(2+) lone pair in perovskite cssnbr3,

D. H. Fabini, G. Laurita, J. S. Bechtel, C. C. Stoumpos, H. A. Evans, A. G. Kontos, Y. S. Raptis, P. Falaras, A. Van der Ven, M. G. Kanatzidis, and R. Seshadri, “Dynamic stereochemical activity of the sn(2+) lone pair in perovskite cssnbr3,” J Am Chem Soc 138, 11820–32 (2016)

2016
[13]

Urbach’s rule derived from thermal fluctuations in the band-gap energy,

Torben Skettrup, “Urbach’s rule derived from thermal fluctuations in the band-gap energy,” Physical review B 18, 2622 (1978)

1978
[14]

Anomalous urbach tail in gaas,

CW Greeff and HR Glyde, “Anomalous urbach tail in gaas,” Physical Review B 51, 1778 (1995)

1995
[15]

Dynamic local symmetry fluctuations of electron density in halide perovskites,

Colin M. Hylton-Farrington and Richard C. Remsing, “Dynamic local symmetry fluctuations of electron density in halide perovskites,” Chemistry of Materials (2024), 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01121

2024 doi
[16]

The significance of po- larons and dynamic disorder in halide perovskites,

Maximilian J Schilcher, Paul J Robinson, David J Abramovitch, Liang Z Tan, Andrew M Rappe, David R Reichman, and David A Egger, “The significance of po- larons and dynamic disorder in halide perovskites,” ACS Energy Letters 6, 2162–2173 (2021)

2021
[17]

Correlated anharmonicity and dynamic disorder control carrier transport in halide perovskites,

Maximilian J Schilcher, David J Abramovitch, Matthew Z Mayers, Liang Z Tan, David R Reich- man, and David A Egger, “Correlated anharmonicity and dynamic disorder control carrier transport in halide perovskites,” Physical Review Materials 7, L081601 (2023)

2023
[18]

Analysis of real-space transport channels for electrons and holes in halide per- ovskites,

Frederik Vonhoff, Maximilian J Schilcher, David R Re- ichman, and David A Egger, “Analysis of real-space transport channels for electrons and holes in halide per- ovskites,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19999 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[19]

First-principles indicators of metal- licity and cation off-centricity in the iv-vi rocksalt chalco- genides of divalent ge, sn, and pb,

UV Waghmare, NA Spaldin, Hem Chandra Kandpal, and Ram Seshadri, “First-principles indicators of metal- licity and cation off-centricity in the iv-vi rocksalt chalco- genides of divalent ge, sn, and pb,” Physical Review B 67, 125111 (2003)

2003
[20]

Entropically stabi- lized local dipole formation in lead chalcogenides,

Emil S Boˇ zin, Christos D Malliakas, Petros Sou- vatzis, Thomas Proffen, Nicola A Spaldin, Mercouri G Kanatzidis, and Simon JL Billinge, “Entropically stabi- lized local dipole formation in lead chalcogenides,” Sci- ence 330, 1660–1663 (2010)

2010
[21]

Emphanisis in cubic (snse)0.5(agsbse2)0.5: Dynamical off-centering of anion leads to low thermal conductivity and high thermoelec- tric performance,

Moinak Dutta, Koushik Pal, Martin Etter, Umesh V. Waghmare, and Kanishka Biswas, “Emphanisis in cubic (snse)0.5(agsbse2)0.5: Dynamical off-centering of anion leads to low thermal conductivity and high thermoelec- tric performance,” Journal of the American Chemical So- ciety 14...

2021
[22]

All-inorganic halide perovskites as potential thermoelectric materials: Dynamic cation off-centering induces ultralow thermal conductivity,

H. Xie, S. Hao, J. Bao, T. J. Slade, G. J. Snyder, C. Wolverton, and M. G. Kanatzidis, “All-inorganic halide perovskites as potential thermoelectric materials: Dynamic cation off-centering induces ultralow thermal conductivity,” J Am Chem Soc 142, 9553–9563 (2020)

2020
[23]

Metal cation s lone- pairs increase octahedral tilting instabilities in halide per- ovskites,

L. Y. Gao, L. Yadgarov, R. Sharma, R. Korobko, K. M. McCall, D. H. Fabini, C. C. Stoumpos, M. G. Kanatzidis, A. M. Rappe, and O. Yaffe, “Metal cation s lone- pairs increase octahedral tilting instabilities in halide per- ovskites,” Materials Advances 2, 4610–4616 (2021)

2021
[24]

Interplay of octahedral rotations and lone pair ferroelectricity in CsPbF3,

E. H. Smith, N. A. Benedek, and C. J. Fennie, “Interplay of octahedral rotations and lone pair ferroelectricity in CsPbF3,” Inorg Chem 54, 8536–43 (2015)

2015
[25]

Empty per- ovskites as coulomb floppy networks: entropic elastic- ity and negative thermal expansion,

Alexei V Tkachenko and Igor A Zaliznyak, “Empty per- ovskites as coulomb floppy networks: entropic elastic- ity and negative thermal expansion,” Physical Review B 103, 134106 (2021)

2021
[26]

Disentan- gling the effects of structure and lone-pair electrons in the lattice dynamics of halide perovskites,

S. Caicedo-Davila, A. Cohen, S. G. Motti, M. Isobe, K. M. McCall, M. Grumet, M. V. Kovalenko, O. Yaffe, L. M. Herz, D. H. Fabini, and D. A. Egger, “Disentan- gling the effects of structure and lone-pair electrons in the lattice dynamics of halide perovskites,” Nat Commun15, 41...

2024
[27]

Distortion modes in halide per- ovskites: To twist or to stretch, a matter of tolerance and lone pairs,

Santosh Kumar Radha, Churna Bhandari, and Wal- ter RL Lambrecht, “Distortion modes in halide per- ovskites: To twist or to stretch, a matter of tolerance and lone pairs,” Physical Review Materials 2, 063605 (2018)

2018
[28]

Electron–phonon coupling in CsPbBr3,

Xianzhong Zhou and Ziyang Zhang, “Electron–phonon coupling in CsPbBr3,” AIP Advances 10 (2020), 10.1063/5.0017149

2020 doi
[29]

Lat- tice dynamics in perovskite halides CsSn X3 with X=I, Br, Cl,

Ling-yi Huang and Walter R. L. Lambrecht, “Lat- tice dynamics in perovskite halides CsSn X3 with X=I, Br, Cl,” Physical Review B 90 (2014), 10.1103/Phys- RevB.90.195201

2014 doi
[30]

Coexis- tence of polar and antipolar phases in ferroelectric halide perovskite CsGeBr3,

Ravi Kashikar, S. Lisenkov, and I. Ponomareva, “Coexis- tence of polar and antipolar phases in ferroelectric halide perovskite CsGeBr3,” Physical Review B 109 (2024), 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L020101

2024 doi
[31]

Elec- tronic paddle-wheels in a solid-state electrolyte,

H. S. Dhattarwal, R. Somni, and R. C. Remsing, “Elec- tronic paddle-wheels in a solid-state electrolyte,” Nat Commun 15, 121 (2024)

2024
[32]

Translation- rotation coupling, phase transitions, and elastic phenom- ena in orientationally disordered crystals,

R. M. Lynden-Bell and K. H. Michel, “Translation- rotation coupling, phase transitions, and elastic phenom- ena in orientationally disordered crystals,” Reviews of Modern Physics 66, 721–762 (1994)

1994
[33]

Orienta- tional order in ionic-crystals containing tetrahedral ions,

M. L. Klein, I. R. Mcdonald, and Y. Ozaki, “Orienta- tional order in ionic-crystals containing tetrahedral ions,” Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 5579–5587 (1983)

1983
[34]

Hypervalent bonding in one, two, and three dimensions: Extending the zintl–klemm concept to nonclassical electron-rich net- 10 works,

Garegin A. Papoian and Roald Hoffmann, “Hypervalent bonding in one, two, and three dimensions: Extending the zintl–klemm concept to nonclassical electron-rich net- 10 works,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 39, 2408–2448 (2000)

2000
[35]

Electron-rich rods as building blocks for sb strips and te sheets,

Garegin Papoian and Roald Hoffmann, “Electron-rich rods as building blocks for sb strips and te sheets,” Jour- nal of the American Chemical Society 123, 6600–6608 (2001)

2001
[36]

Electron-rich bonding and the importance of s, p mixing as one moves across a period: A lesson from the lisn system,

Andrea Ienco, Roald Hoffmann, and Garegin Papoian, “Electron-rich bonding and the importance of s, p mixing as one moves across a period: A lesson from the lisn system,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 123, 2317–2325 (2001)

2001
[37]

Building up complexity from strips and sheets: The electronic struc- ture of the la12mn2sb30alloy,

Garegin Papoian and Roald Hoffmann, “Building up complexity from strips and sheets: The electronic struc- ture of the la12mn2sb30alloy,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry 139, 8–21 (1998)

1998
[38]

Octahedral units in halide perovskites,

Yong Wang, Yu Wang, Tiarnan AS Doherty, Samuel D Stranks, Feng Gao, and Deren Yang, “Octahedral units in halide perovskites,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 9, 261–277 (2025)

2025
[39]

Octahe- dral tilting instabilities in inorganic halide perovskites,

Jonathon S. Bechtel and Anton Van der Ven, “Octahe- dral tilting instabilities in inorganic halide perovskites,” Physical Review Materials 2 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRev- Materials.2.025401

2018 doi
[40]

Resolving the phys- ical origin of octahedral tilting in halide perovskites,

Jung-Hoon Lee, Nicholas C. Bristowe, June Ho Lee, Sung-Hoon Lee, Paul D. Bristowe, Anthony K. Cheetham, and Hyun Myung Jang, “Resolving the phys- ical origin of octahedral tilting in halide perovskites,” Chemistry of Materials 28, 4259–4266 (2016)

2016
[41]

Competing structural instabilities in cubic perovskites,

W Zhong and David Vanderbilt, “Competing structural instabilities in cubic perovskites,” Physical review letters 74, 2587 (1995)

1995
[42]

First- principles theory of ferroelectric phase transitions for per- ovskites: The case of batio 3,

W Zhong, David Vanderbilt, and KM Rabe, “First- principles theory of ferroelectric phase transitions for per- ovskites: The case of batio 3,” Physical Review B 52, 6301 (1995)

1995
[43]

First-principles study of ferroelectric and antiferrodistortive instabilities in tetrag- onal srtio 3,

Na Sai and David Vanderbilt, “First-principles study of ferroelectric and antiferrodistortive instabilities in tetrag- onal srtio 3,” Physical Review B 62, 13942 (2000)

2000
[44]

First-principles model potentials for lattice-dynamical studies: general methodology and example of application to ferroic per- ovskite oxides,

Jacek C Wojde l, Patrick Hermet, Mathias P Ljungberg, Philippe Ghosez, and Jorge ´I˜ niguez, “First-principles model potentials for lattice-dynamical studies: general methodology and example of application to ferroic per- ovskite oxides,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2...

2013
[45]

Competition and cooperation between antiferrodistortive and ferroelectric instabilities in the model perovskite srtio3,

Ulrich Aschauer and Nicola A Spaldin, “Competition and cooperation between antiferrodistortive and ferroelectric instabilities in the model perovskite srtio3,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 26, 122203 (2014)

2014
[46]

Cooperative cou- plings between octahedral rotations and ferroelectricity in perovskites and related materials,

Teng Gu, Timothy Scarbrough, Yurong Yang, Jorge ´I˜ niguez, L Bellaiche, and HJ Xiang, “Cooperative cou- plings between octahedral rotations and ferroelectricity in perovskites and related materials,” Physical review let- ters 120, 197602 (2018)

2018
[47]

Lead-free europium and ytterbium per- ovskites,

Chih Shan Tan, “Lead-free europium and ytterbium per- ovskites,” RSC advances 13, 19013–19019 (2023)

2023
[48]

Local symmetry breaking suppresses thermal conduc- tivity in crystalline solids,

Moinak Dutta, Matukumilli V. D. Prasad, Juhi Pandey, Ajay Soni, Umesh V. Waghmare, and Kanishka Biswas, “Local symmetry breaking suppresses thermal conduc- tivity in crystalline solids,” Angewandte Chemie Inter- national Edition 61, e202200071 (2022)

2022
[49]

Hidden structures: a driv- ing factor to achieve low thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric performance,

Debattam Sarkar, Animesh Bhui, Ivy Maria, Moinak Dutta, and Kanishka Biswas, “Hidden structures: a driv- ing factor to achieve low thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric performance,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 6100– 6149 (2024)

2024
[50]

Novel inorganic materials generated by aliovalent anion substitution,

Anand Roy and CNR Rao, “Novel inorganic materials generated by aliovalent anion substitution,” APL Mate- rials 7 (2019)

2019
[51]

Notable effects of aliovalent anion substitu- tion on the electronic structure and properties of metal oxides and sulfides,

CNR Rao, “Notable effects of aliovalent anion substitu- tion on the electronic structure and properties of metal oxides and sulfides,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6, 3303–3308 (2015)

2015
[52]

Metal-doped lead halide perovskites: Synthesis, properties, and optoelectronic applications,

Yang Zhou, Jie Chen, Osman M. Bakr, and Hong-Tao Sun, “Metal-doped lead halide perovskites: Synthesis, properties, and optoelectronic applications,” Chemistry of Materials 30, 6589–6613 (2018)

2018
[53]

Effect of aliovalent bismuth substitution on structure and optical properties of cssnbr3,

Madhusudan Chaudhary, Abhoy Karmakar, Vidyanshu Mishra, Amit Bhattacharya, Dundappa Mumbaraddi, Arthur Mar, and Vladimir K. Michaelis, “Effect of aliovalent bismuth substitution on structure and optical properties of cssnbr3,” Communications Chemistry 6, 75 (2023)

2023
[54]

Electronic impurity dop- ing of a 2d hybrid lead iodide perovskite by Bi and Sn,

Haipeng Lu, Gabrielle Koknat, Yi Yao, Ji Hao, Xixi Qin, Chuanxiao Xiao, Ruyi Song, Florian Merz, Markus Rampp, Sebastian Kokott, Christian Carbogno, Tianyang Li, Glenn Teeter, Matthias Scheffler, Joseph J. Berry, David B. Mitzi, Jeffrey L. Blackburn, Volker Blum, and Matthew C...

2023
[55]

Quantifying dynamic tilting in halide per- ovskites: Chemical trends and local correlations,

Julia Wiktor, Erik Fransson, Dominik Kubicki, and Paul Erhart, “Quantifying dynamic tilting in halide per- ovskites: Chemical trends and local correlations,” Chem- istry of Materials 35, 6737–6744 (2023)

2023
[56]

Cp2k: An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package - quickstep: Effi- cient and accurate electronic structure calculations,

T. D. Kuhne et al., “Cp2k: An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package - quickstep: Effi- cient and accurate electronic structure calculations,” J Chem Phys 152, 194103 (2020)

2020
[57]

Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases,

J. VandeVondele and J. Hutter, “Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases,” J Chem Phys 127, 114105 (2007)

2007
[58]

Separable dual- space Gaussian pseudopotentials,

S. Goedecker, M. Teter, and J. Hutter, “Separable dual- space Gaussian pseudopotentials,” Phys Rev B Condens Matter 54, 1703–1710 (1996)

1996
[59]

Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys Rev Lett77, 3865–3868 (1996)

1996
[60]

A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of den- sity functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements H-Pu,

S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of den- sity functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements H-Pu,” J Chem Phys 132, 154104 (2010)

2010
[61]

Lunt, Lili Wang, (2018)

Pei Chen Richard R. Lunt, Lili Wang, (2018)

2018
[62]

Perspective: Theory and simulation of hybrid halide perovskites,

L. D. Whalley, J. M. Frost, Y. K. Jung, and A. Walsh, “Perspective: Theory and simulation of hybrid halide perovskites,” J Chem Phys 146, 220901 (2017)

2017
[63]

Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications,

Nicola Marzari, Arash A Mostofi, Jonathan R Yates, Ivo Souza, and David Vanderbilt, “Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications,” Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 1419 (2012)

2012
[64]

General and effi- cient algorithms for obtaining maximally localized Wan- nier functions,

Gerd Berghold, Christopher J. Mundy, Aldo H. Romero, J¨ urg Hutter, and Michele Parrinello, “General and effi- cient algorithms for obtaining maximally localized Wan- nier functions,” Physical Review B 61, 10040–10048 (2000)

2000
[65]

Phonon dispersion measured di- rectly from molecular dynamics simulations,

Ling Ti Kong, “Phonon dispersion measured di- rectly from molecular dynamics simulations,” Computer Physics Communications 182, 2201–2207 (2011)

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semiconductors,

Mohammad Ubaid, Paribesh Acharyya, Suneet K. Maha- rana, Kanishka Biswas, and Koushik Pal, “Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semiconductors,” Applied Physics Reviews 11 (2024), 10.1063/5.0227080

doi:10.1063/5.0227080 2024

[2] [2]

Intrinsically ultralow thermal conductivity in ruddlesden-popper 2d perovskite cs(2)pbi(2)cl(2): Localized anharmonic vibrations and dynamic octahedral distortions,

P. Acharyya, T. Ghosh, K. Pal, K. Kundu, K. Singh Rana, J. Pandey, A. Soni, U. V. Wagh- mare, and K. Biswas, “Intrinsically ultralow thermal conductivity in ruddlesden-popper 2d perovskite cs(2)pbi(2)cl(2): Localized anharmonic vibrations and dynamic octahedral distortions,” J Am Chem Soc 142, 15595–15603 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells,

C. Eames, J. M. Frost, P. R. Barnes, B. C. O’Regan, A. Walsh, and M. S. Islam, “Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells,” Nat Commun 6, 7497 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

How lattice and charge fluctu- ations control carrier dynamics in halide perovskites,

M. Z. Mayers, L. Z. Tan, D. A. Egger, A. M. Rappe, and D. R. Reichman, “How lattice and charge fluctu- ations control carrier dynamics in halide perovskites,” Nano Lett 18, 8041–8046 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Lone-pair stereo- chemistry induces ferroelectric distortion and the rashba 9 effect in inorganic halide perovskites,

Michael W. Swift and John L. Lyons, “Lone-pair stereo- chemistry induces ferroelectric distortion and the rashba 9 effect in inorganic halide perovskites,” Chemistry of Ma- terials 35, 9370–9377 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites,

Michael A Becker, Roman Vaxenburg, Georgian Nedelcu, Peter C Sercel, Andrew Shabaev, Michael J Mehl, John G Michopoulos, Samuel G Lambrakos, Noam Bernstein, John L Lyons, et al., “Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites,” Nature 553, 189–193 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Excitons and their fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals from atomistic gw/bse calculations,

Giulia Biffi, Yeongsu Cho, Roman Krahne, and Tim- othy C Berkelbach, “Excitons and their fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals from atomistic gw/bse calculations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, 1891–1898 (2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Size-dependent lattice symmetry break- ing determines the exciton fine structure of perovskite nanocrystals,

Daniel Weinberg, Yoonjae Park, David T Limmer, and Eran Rabani, “Size-dependent lattice symmetry break- ing determines the exciton fine structure of perovskite nanocrystals,” Nano Letters 23, 4997–5003 (2023)

work page 2023