Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Charge transfer empties the flat band in 4H$_b$-TaS$_2$ -- except at the surface

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In bulk 4Hb-TaS2, charge transfer empties the T-layer flat band; only at the surface does a metallic, planar-chiral Fermi surface survive.

desk verdict A promising abstract for a termination-resolved ARPES study that fills a real gap in the 4Hb-TaS2 debate, but the supplied full text is another paper, so the central claim is unverifiable from this document. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16411 v1 pith:KWNSB3KH submitted 2025-08-22 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Mihir Date , Hyeonhu Bae , Alex Louat , Gabriele Domaine , Niels B. M. Schröter , 2 Enrico Da Como , Binghai Yan , Matthew D. Watson This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el PACS 79.60.-i71.20.-b
keywords 4Hb-TaS2chargetransferflatbandangle-resolvedphotoemissionplanarchiralitysuperconductivityT-HheterostructureclusterMott
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses micro-focused angle-resolved photoemission to compare a T-terminated surface and a subsurface T layer seen through an H termination, which is closer to the bulk. It argues that in the bulk of 4Hb-TaS2 the T layer transfers a full electron per 13 tantalum atoms to adjacent H layers, leaving the T-derived flat band empty and gapped. At the T termination, charge transfer is incomplete, producing a metallic Fermi surface with planar chirality. This rules out cluster Mott localization in both bulk and surface states and points to superconductivity driven by Josephson-like tunneling between H layers.

What carries the argument

Micro-focused ARPES is the central tool: it resolves separate spectral responses from a T-terminated surface and from a subsurface T layer buried under an H termination. The contrast between those two spectra carries the argument: a gapped subsurface T layer indicates complete charge transfer in the bulk; a metallic T-terminated layer indicates incomplete transfer.

What would settle it

Find the T-layer flat band partially occupied when looking with a bulk-sensitive probe (for example, x-ray absorption edge of Ta, bulk-sensitive ARPES at higher photon energies, or scanning tunneling spectroscopy on a bulk T layer), or show the subsurface T-layer signal reappears when photon energy or polarization is varied.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that electron counting in 4Hb-TaS2 is termination-dependent: in the bulk, one electron per 13 Ta is completely transferred from each T layer to its neighboring H layers, emptying the T-layer flat band, while at a T-terminated surface the transfer is incomplete and the surface hosts a metallic Fermi surface of planar-chiral character. A similar metallic state appears in an anomalous T-H-H' stacked region. The authors take this as evidence against cluster Mott localization and in favor of interlayer Josephson coupling as the origin of superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a subsurface T layer viewed through an H termination faithfully represents the bulk T layer—i.e., that the H surface neither dopes nor distorts the T layer, and that the missing T-derived spectral weight is a genuine gap rather than a photoemission matrix-element suppression.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bulk T layers are insulating, so the T flat band plays no role in bulk conductivity or superconductivity.
  • The T-terminated surface is a metallic planar-chiral system whose Fermi surface is distinct from the bulk electronic structure.
  • Superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2 should be understood as arising from H layers coupled by Josephson-like tunneling, not from T-layer correlations.
  • Electron counting of one electron per 13 Ta gives a concrete prescription for models of the bulk electronic structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If charge transfer can be tuned by electrostatic gating or strain, the surface metallic state might be switched on and off, offering a control knob for the planar-chiral metal.
  • The planar-chiral surface state could host non-trivial transport or spin textures; testing Hall or circular dichroism responses would be a natural extension.
  • A direct bulk-sensitive probe (e.g., bulk-sensitive x-ray ARPES or resonant inelastic x-ray scattering) would sharply test whether the empty bulk flat band extends beyond the near-surface region sampled here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.16411) reports micro-focused angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of 4Hb-TaS2. Based on the abstract, the authors observe a metallic T termination and a gapped subsurface T layer below an H termination. They infer a complete bulk charge transfer of 1 electron per 13 Ta from the T layers to adjacent H layers, incomplete charge transfer at the T termination producing a planar-chiral metallic Fermi surface, and an anomalous T-H-H' stacked region with a similar metallic state. They also conclude that cluster Mott localization is excluded and that superconductivity arises from Josephson-like tunneling between H layers. However, the supplied full text is not the TaS2 paper: it is arXiv:2508.16409v2, a theoretical study of exciton symmetries in MoS2. Consequently, none of the experimental methods, data, sample characterization, or charge-counting model for the TaS2 claim is available in this submission.

Significance. If the reported bulk/surface dichotomy is correct, it would settle a long-standing question about the fate of the T-derived flat band in 4Hb-TaS2 and would provide a concrete electronic basis for the proposed chiral superconducting state. The claim is falsifiable: it predicts a gapped T-derived band in the bulk and a metallic, planar-chiral surface state. These are substantive and testable predictions. However, because the submission lacks the experimental section and underlying data, the quantitative significance—especially the exact '1 electron per 13 Ta'—cannot currently be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (entire submission)] The body of the submission is arXiv:2508.16409v2, 'Symmetries in zero and finite center-of-mass momenta excitons', not the 4Hb-TaS2 ARPES manuscript. This is a load-bearing omission: the central quantitative claim (complete charge transfer of 1 electron per 13 Ta) is not supported by any methods, data, or analysis in the submitted text. Without the correct experimental sections, no technical evaluation of the paper is possible.
  2. [Abstract, 'subsurface T layer ... is gapped'] The inference that the subsurface T-layer gap represents the bulk T layer requires that the H-terminated surface leaves the adjacent T layer electronically unperturbed, and that the absence of T-derived spectral weight at the Fermi level is a true many-body gap rather than a photoemission matrix-element node or kz-integration artifact. The abstract provides no control measurement (e.g., photon-energy dependence, polarization dependence) or comparison with layer-projected DFT to establish this identification. Please provide such evidence or temper the bulk charge-transfer conclusion.
  3. [Abstract, 'complete charge transfer of 1 electron per 13 Ta'] This exact integer is a strong quantitative claim. It must be derived from a defined charge-counting procedure that converts the measured spectral gap into a per-layer electron count, and it should be accompanied by an estimate of uncertainty. The abstract states the result without showing the model, its parameters, or how the integer is obtained. If the value follows from an assumed rigid band shift or an independent-electron count, that assumption should be explicit and justified.
  4. [Abstract, 'anomalous region with likely T-H-H' stacking'] The stacking assignment for the anomalous region appears to be load-bearing for the claim of a similar metallic surface state. The abstract provides no supporting data (e.g., LEED/STM or ARPES symmetry analysis) for the T-H-H' stacking versus other stackings. The assignment should be justified in the full paper, not merely stated as 'likely'.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, 'planar-chiral character'] This term is not defined in the abstract. The main text should specify the broken symmetry (which mirror plane) and show that the Fermi surface indeed lacks that mirror symmetry, e.g., by a constant-energy map or a calculated Fermi surface overlay.
  2. [Abstract, 'exclude cluster Mott localisation'] The statement that cluster Mott localization is excluded is stronger than a statement that the T layer is gapped/metallic. Please specify the criterion (e.g., bandwidth versus interaction scale) and the relevant measurements that support the exclusion.
  3. [General] Because the supplied text is a different manuscript, no figures, sample preparation details, experimental geometry, or data availability statement for the TaS2 work were available for review. These should be included in a resubmission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ARPES observations are external input, and the charge-transfer conclusion is an interpretive inference from the measured gap, not a re-statement of the input.

full rationale

The abstract's central claims are derived from micro-focused ARPES data: the T termination is observed to be metallic, while a subsurface T layer observed through an H termination is gapped. From this contrast the authors infer complete charge transfer in the bulk and incomplete transfer at the surface. This is a physical interpretation of external spectroscopic data, not a quantity that was defined in terms of the conclusion. No equation in the visible text reduces the predicted quantity to the fitted input. There is no self-citation chain, no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern as a new result. The weakest assumptions—that the subsurface geometry is bulk-representative and that the missing spectral weight is a true gap rather than a matrix-element suppression—are validity concerns about the measurement interpretation, not circularity. The supplied full-text file is actually a different manuscript (arXiv:2508.16409, a MoS2 exciton-theory paper), so the methods used to convert spectral gaps into the quantitative 1 e/13 Ta charge transfer cannot be inspected here. However, the absence of verifiable methods is a verification gap, not evidence of circular reasoning. Under the rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quoting the paper and exhibiting a specific reduction, no such reduction is available in the abstract; therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone, the central quantitative claim rests on (1) equating absent ARPES intensity with a gap, (2) assuming the H-termination measurement represents bulk, and (3) trusting a 'likely' stacking assignment for the anomalous region. No model parameters for the 1e/13Ta counting are visible, and no new particles, forces, mediators, or conserved quantities are introduced. The planar-chiral Fermi surface is a symmetry property of measured states and Josephson-like tunneling is a proposed pairing scenario, neither of which is a postulated entity.

free parameters (1)
  • Charge-counting model parameters converting spectral gaps to integer per-layer electron numbers
    The abstract's quantitative claim of 1 electron per 13 Ta transferred needs a model linking ARPES spectral weight to per-layer charges; the model and any fitted values are not visible in the abstract and are load-bearing for the central claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Absence of T-derived ARPES intensity in the subsurface T layer indicates a true electronic gap, not a matrix-element, final-state, or cross-section effect.
    The abstract infers 'a subsurface T layer ... is gapped' from spectra taken below an H termination. Photoemission can suppress bands by matrix elements, final states, or surface sensitivity; the abstract states no control for this.
  • domain assumption The subsurface T layer beneath an H termination is representative of the bulk T layer.
    The abstract relies on this geometry being 'more representative of the bulk case.' If the H-terminated surface dopes or strains the neighboring T layer, the observed gap would be surface-induced rather than bulk charge transfer.
  • domain assumption The anomalous surface region has T-H-H' stacking.
    The abstract calls this stacking 'likely' and attributes the similar metallic state to incomplete charge transfer in that stacking. If the assignment is inferred from the same ARPES spectra, this leg risks circularity; it is a stated premise of the surface claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge transfer empties the flat band in 4H$_b$-TaS$_2$ -- except at the surface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KWNSB3KH

@misc{pith2026250816411,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge transfer empties the flat band in 4H$_b$-TaS$_2$ -- except at the surface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KWNSB3KH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16411}
}
abstract

The 4H\textsubscript{b} polytype of TaS$_2$ is a natural heterostructure of H and T-type layers. Intriguing recent evidence points towards a possibly chiral superconducting ground state, unlike the superconductivity found in other polytypes where the T layers are absent, requiring understanding of the possible contributions of electrons from the T layers. Here we use micro-focused angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy to reveal that the T termination of the 4H\textsubscript{b} structure is metallic, but a subsurface T layer -- seen below an H termination and thus more representative of the bulk case -- is gapped. The results imply a complete charge transfer of 1 electron per 13 Ta from the T to adjacent H layers in the bulk, but an incomplete charge transfer at the T termination, yielding a metallic Fermi surface with a planar-chiral character. A similar metallic state is found in an anomalous region with likely T-H-H' stacking at the surface. Our results exclude cluster Mott localisation in either the bulk or surface of 4H$_b$-TaS$_2$ and point to a scenario of superconductivity arising from Josephson-like tunneling between the H layers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bulk Superconductivity driven by Disorder-Induced Delocalization in 4Hb-Ta(S$_{1-x}$Se$_x$)$_2$

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Disorder-induced delocalization in the Mott-like layer of 4Hb-TaS2 forms a new Fermi surface that drives bulk superconductivity absent in clean samples.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The electron and hole quasiparticle Hamiltonians are invariant with respect to discrete lattice trans- lations: He/h(r+R,r ′ +R) =H e/h(r,r ′) (67)

    work page

  2. [2]

    The interactions are invariant with respect to the discrete lattice translations as listed below: W(r+R,r ′ +R) =W(r,r ′) v(r+R,r ′ +R) =v(r,r ′) (68) A3. BSE Kernel invariance under simultaneous translations We translate all four coordinates by the same Bravais vectorRas follows: (re,r h,r ′ e,r ′ h)7→(r e +R,r h +R,r ′ e +R,r ′ h +R) We examine each ter...

    work page

  3. [3]

    = Z Z dr′ 1dr′ 2 HBSE(r1 −R,r 2 −R;r ′ 1 −R,r ′ 2 −R) ×Ψ(r ′ 1 −R,r ′ 2 −R) (72) In the last equation, we have used the translational in- variance of the Hamiltonian

    Ψ(r′ 1 −R,r ′ 2 −R). = Z Z dr′ 1dr′ 2 HBSE(r1 −R,r 2 −R;r ′ 1 −R,r ′ 2 −R) ×Ψ(r ′ 1 −R,r ′ 2 −R) (72) In the last equation, we have used the translational in- variance of the Hamiltonian. Changing integration vari- ables tor ′′ 1 =r ′ 1 −R,r ′′ 2 =r ′ 2 −R, one finds: h ˆHBSE ˆT ex R Ψ i (r1,r 2) = Z Z dr′′ 1 dr′′ 2 HBSE(r1 −R,r 2 −R;r ′′ 1 ,r ′′ 2 ) Ψ(r′...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren(Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, 1931)

    E. Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren(Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, 1931)

    work page 1931

  5. [5]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer, 2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics (Dover Publications, 2003)

    M. Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics (Dover Publications, 2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    G. F. Bassani and G. P. Parravicini,Electronic States and Optical Transitions in Solids, International Series of Monographs in the Science of the Solid State, Vol. 8 (Pergamon Press, 1975)

    work page 1975

  8. [8]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. de la Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bil- bao crystallographic server, Bulgarian Chemical Commu- nications43, 183 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Shinohara, A

    K. Shinohara, A. Togo, and I. Tanaka, spgrep: On-the- fly generator of space-group irreducible representations, Journal of Open Source Software8, 5269 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Iraola, J

    M. Iraola, J. L. Ma˜ nes, B. Bradlyn, M. K. Horton, T. Ne- upert, M. G. Vergniory, and S. S. Tsirkin, Irrep: Sym- metry eigenvalues and irreducible representations of ab initio band structures, Computer Physics Communica- tions272, 108226 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Deslippe, G

    J. Deslippe, G. Samsonidze, D. A. Strubbe, M. Jain, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, BerkeleyGW: A mas- sively parallel computer package for the calculation of the quasiparticle and optical properties of materials and nanostructures, Computer Physics Communications183, 1269 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Marini, C

    A. Marini, C. Hogan, M. Gr¨ uning, and D. Varsano, yambo: An ab initio tool for excited state calculations, Computer Physics Communications180, 1392 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Y. Li, A. Chernikov, X. Zhang, A. Rigosi, H. M. Hill, A. M. van der Zande, D. A. Chenet, E.-M. Shih, J. Hone, and T. F. Heinz, Measurement of the optical dielectric 17 function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2, Phys. Rev. B90, 205422 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WS2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic exci- tations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s- function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 601 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Rohlfing and S

    M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Electron-hole excitations and optical spectra from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    Albrecht, L

    S. Albrecht, L. Reining, R. Del Sole, and G. Onida, Ab initio Calculation of Excitonic Effects in the Opti- cal Spectra of Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 4510 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    Rohlfing and S

    M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Electron-Hole Excitations in Semiconductors and Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2312 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    F. Wu, F. Qu, and A. H. MacDonald, Exciton band struc- ture of monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B91, 075310 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Robert, B

    C. Robert, B. Han, P. Kapuscinski, A. Delhomme, C. Faugeras, T. Amand, M. R. Molas, M. Bartos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Urbaszek, M. Potemski, and X. Marie, Measurement of the spin-forbidden dark excitons in MoS 2 and MoSe 2 monolayers, Nature Com- munications11, 4037 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Galvani, F

    T. Galvani, F. Paleari, H. P. C. Miranda, A. Molina- S´ anchez, L. Wirtz, S. Latil, H. Amara, and F. m. c. Ducastelle, Excitons in boron nitride single layer, Phys. Rev. B94, 125303 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Zanfrognini, N

    M. Zanfrognini, N. Spallanzani, M. Bonacci, E. Molinari, A. Ruini, M. J. Caldas, A. Ferretti, and D. Varsano, Effect of uniaxial strain on the excitonic properties of monolayer C3n: A symmetry-based analysis, Phys. Rev. B107, 045430 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    P. E. F. Junior, D. Hernang´ omez-P´ erez, T. Amit, J. Fabian, and S. Refaely-Abramson, Generalized many- body exciton g-factors: magnetic hybridization and non- monotonic rydberg series in monolayer WSe 2 (2025), arXiv:2505.18468 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Davenport, J

    H. Davenport, J. Knolle, and F. Schindler, Interaction- Induced Crystalline Topology of Excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 176601 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Davenport, J

    H. Davenport, J. Knolle, and F. Schindler, Exci- ton Berryology (2025), arXiv:2507.22983 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2025

  18. [26]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. ...

    2009

  20. [28]

    Gonze, B

    X. Gonze, B. Amadon, P.-M. Anglade, J.-M. Beuken, F. Bottin, P. Boulanger, F. Bruneval, D. Caliste, R. Cara- cas, M. Cˆ ot´ e, T. Deutsch, L. Genovese, P. Ghosez, M. Gi- antomassi, S. Goedecker, D. Hamann, P. Hermet, F. Jol- let, G. Jomard, S. Leroux, M. Mancini, S. Mazevet, M...

    2009

  21. [29]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calcu- lations in materials science, Scripta Materialia108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Togo, First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan92, 012001 (2023)

    A. Togo, First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Y. H. Chan, J. B. Haber, M. H. Naik, J. B. Neaton, D. Y. Qiu, F. H. da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Exciton Lifetime and Optical Line Width Profile via Exciton-Phonon In- teractions: Theory and First-Principles Calculations for Monolayer MoS2, Nano Letters23, 3971 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Y. H. Chan, M. H. Naik, J. B. Haber, J. B. Neaton, S. G. Louie, D. Y. Qiu, and F. H. da Jornada, Exciton- Phonon Coupling Induces a New Pathway for Ultrafast Intralayer-to-Interlayer Exciton Transition and Interlayer Charge Transfer in WS2-MoS2 Heterostructure: A First- Princi...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Paleari, H

    F. Paleari, H. P. C. Miranda, A. Molina-S´ anchez, and L. Wirtz, Exciton-Phonon Coupling in the Ultraviolet Absorption and Emission Spectra of Bulk Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 187401 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    H.-Y. Chen, D. Sangalli, and M. Bernardi, Exciton- Phonon Interaction and Relaxation Times from First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 107401 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Antonius and S

    G. Antonius and S. G. Louie, Theory of exciton-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B105, 085111 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Nalabothula, L

    M. Nalabothula, L. Wirtz, and S. Reichardt, Origin of Interlayer Exciton-Phonon Coupling in 2d Heterostruc- tures, Nano Letters25, 6160 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Y. H. Chan, J. B. Haber, M. H. Naik, S. G. Louie, J. B. Neaton, F. H. Da Jornada, and D. Y. Qiu, Ex- citon thermalization dynamics in monolayer MoS 2: A first-principles Boltzmann equation study, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184305 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    D. Y. Qiu, F. H. da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Optical spectrum of MoS 2: Many-body effects and diversity of exciton states, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 216805 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Noffsinger, E

    J. Noffsinger, E. Kioupakis, C. G. Van de Walle, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phonon-Assisted Optical Ab- sorption in Silicon from First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 167402 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Marini, M

    G. Marini, M. Calandra, and P. Cudazzo, Optical Ab- sorption and Photoluminescence of Single-Layer Boron Nitride from a First-Principles Cumulant Approach, Nano Letters24, 6017 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    G. G. Macfarlane, T. P. McLean, J. E. Quarrington, and V. Roberts, Fine Structure in the Absorption-Edge Spec- trum of Si, Phys. Rev.111, 1245 (1958)

    1958

  35. [43]

    S. G. Louie, J. R. Chelikowsky, and M. L. Cohen, Local- field effects in the optical spectrum of silicon, Phys. Rev. 18 Lett.34, 155 (1975)

    1975

  36. [44]

    Strinati, Dynamical Shift and Broadening of Core Excitons in Semiconductors, Phys

    G. Strinati, Dynamical Shift and Broadening of Core Excitons in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1519 (1982)

    1982

  37. [45]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Ge...

    2017

  38. [46]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  39. [47]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    van Setten, M

    M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Ver- straete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Com- puter Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations In- cluding Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  42. [50]

    M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasipar- ticle energies, Phys. Rev. B34, 5390 (1986)

    1986

  43. [51]

    B. A. Barker, J. Deslippe, J. Lischner, M. Jain, O. V. Yazyev, D. A. Strubbe, and S. G. Louie, Spinor GW/Bethe-Salpeter calculations in BerkeleyGW: Imple- mentation, symmetries, benchmarking, and performance, Phys. Rev. B106, 115127 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    F. H. da Jornada, D. Y. Qiu, and S. G. Louie, Nonuni- form sampling schemes of the Brillouin zone for many- electron perturbation-theory calculations in reduced di- mensionality, Phys. Rev. B95, 035109 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Ismail-Beigi, Truncation of periodic image interactions for confined systems, Phys

    S. Ismail-Beigi, Truncation of periodic image interactions for confined systems, Phys. Rev. B73, 233103 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    G. F. Koster, J. O. Dimmock, R. G. Wheeler, and H. Statz,Properties of the Thirty-Two Point Groups, Vol. 24 (MIT Press, 1963)

    1963

  47. [55]

    D. Y. Qiu, T. Cao, and S. G. Louie, Nonanalyticity, Val- ley Quantum Phases, and Lightlike Exciton Dispersion in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Theory and First-Principles Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 176801 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    A. A. Toropov, Y. E. Kitaev, T. V. Shubina, P. P. Paskov, J. P. Bergman, B. Monemar, and A. Usui, Polarization- resolved phonon-assisted optical transitions of bound ex- citons in wurtzite GaN, Phys. Rev. B77, 195201 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Molina-S´ anchez and L

    A. Molina-S´ anchez and L. Wirtz, Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS 2 and WS 2, Phys. Rev. B84, 155413 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Scheuschner, R

    N. Scheuschner, R. Gillen, M. Staiger, and J. Maultzsch, Interlayer resonant raman modes in few-layer MoS 2, Phys. Rev. B91, 235409 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    Symmetries in zero and finite centre-of-mass momenta excitons

    R. Bajaj, N. Venkatareddy, H. R. Krishna- murthy, and M. Jain, Dataset for “Symmetries in zero and finite centre-of-mass momenta excitons” 10.6084/m9.figshare.30025483.v1 (2025)

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    J. B. Haber, D. Y. Qiu, F. H. da Jornada, and J. B. Neaton, Maximally localized exciton Wannier functions for solids, Phys. Rev. B108, 125118 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.