Quantum corrections to symmetron fifth-force profiles

Michael Udemba; Peter Millington

arxiv: 2508.16726 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-22 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Quantum corrections to symmetron fifth-force profiles

Peter Millington , Michael Udemba This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 21:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

keywords symmetronfifth forcequantum correctionsscalar-tensor theoriesscreening mechanismsGreen's functionsmodified gravity

0 comments

The pith

Quantum corrections reduce the symmetron fifth force below its classical strength for parameters previously excluded by experiments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a Green's function method to find the leading quantum corrections to the symmetron scalar field profile near a spherically symmetric source, working in the planar limit. This shows that the fifth force can be weaker than the classical calculation indicates. A reader would care because this suggests that some symmetron models, thought to be ruled out, could still be possible when quantum effects are considered. The work highlights the need to include quantum corrections when using local experiments to constrain scalar-tensor theories with screening.

Core claim

The authors outline a Green's function method for obtaining the leading-order quantum corrections to the classical symmetron field profile in the vicinity of a spherically symmetric extended source in the planar limit. For parameters that experiments had previously ruled out, the calculations indicate that the symmetron force may be weaker than the classical field suggests.

What carries the argument

Green's function method to compute leading-order quantum corrections to the symmetron field profile in the planar limit.

If this is right

The symmetron fifth force is suppressed by quantum corrections compared to classical predictions.
Parameter ranges previously excluded by experiments may remain viable when quantum effects are accounted for.
The classical field profile overestimates the force strength in these regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same Green's function approach could be applied to other screened scalar fields like the chameleon.
Future work might relax the planar limit to treat fully spherical sources without approximation.
These corrections could influence the role of symmetrons in cosmological structure formation.

Load-bearing premise

The planar limit approximation together with the leading-order Green's function expansion remains valid for the spherically symmetric extended source.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the fifth-force profile around a suitable source in the parameter regime where quantum corrections are significant, which would differ from the classical prediction if the claim holds.

read the original abstract

Nonlinear scalar-tensor theories of gravity have been considered as candidates for dark matter and dark energy. Often, they possess screening mechanisms, which allow the fifth force mediated by the additional scalar degree(s) of freedom to evade detection from local experiments. Their classical behaviour is well studied, but their quantum nature is relatively unexplored. We outline a Green's function method for obtaining the leading-order quantum corrections to the classical symmetron field profile, in the vicinity of a spherically symmetric extended source, in the planar limit. For parameters that experiments had previously ruled out, our calculations indicate that the symmetron force may be weaker than the classical field suggests.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a Green's function method for leading quantum corrections to symmetron profiles in the planar limit and claims weaker fifth forces for some previously excluded parameters, but the spherical-source approximation looks like the main thing to check.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work outlines a Green's function approach to compute the leading quantum corrections to the classical symmetron field profile around a spherically symmetric source, done in the planar limit. For parameters that experiments had ruled out on classical grounds, the calculation suggests the fifth force ends up weaker than the tree-level result would indicate. That is the headline claim. What is actually new is the concrete application of the Green's function technique to extract these corrections in a screened scalar-tensor model; the classical symmetron literature has not typically gone this route. The paper does a reasonable job of setting up the perturbative expansion and explaining why one might expect quantum effects to matter in the vicinity of the source. The method is presented as a first step rather than a complete resummation, which keeps expectations realistic. The soft spot is the planar-limit replacement itself. When the source radius R is comparable to the inverse mass of the symmetron fluctuations inside the screened region, the curvature scale is not parametrically small, so higher-order terms in the propagator expansion are not obviously suppressed. That could shift the size or even the sign of the correction to the force profile. The abstract gives no error estimates or cross-checks against known limits, so the quantitative claim about reopening parameter space stays provisional until those controls are shown. The citations track the relevant classical screening papers without obvious gaps or self-referential loops. The derivations appear to be standard perturbative work rather than machine-checked or independently reproducible at this stage. This paper is for theorists already working on modified gravity and screening mechanisms who want to see how quantum corrections might be approached. A reader looking for a concrete computational outline will get something useful from it, even if the final numbers need more validation. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee who can press on the validity of the planar approximation and the size of the neglected curvature terms.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper outlines a Green's function method for computing the leading-order quantum corrections to the classical symmetron field profile near a spherically symmetric extended source in the planar limit. It concludes that, for parameters previously excluded by experiments, these corrections indicate the symmetron fifth force may be weaker than the classical prediction.

Significance. If the approximations hold, the result would suggest that quantum effects can relax experimental bounds on symmetron models, providing a new handle on screened scalar-tensor theories. The work attempts to address an underexplored quantum regime, but its impact hinges on the validity of the planar-limit expansion for spherical sources.

major comments (1)

Section 3: the leading quantum correction is obtained by replacing the spherical geometry with a locally flat slab and retaining only the first term in the Green's function series. When the source radius R satisfies mR ≲ 1 inside the screened region, higher-order curvature terms in the propagator are not parametrically suppressed; this can alter the sign or magnitude of the correction to the force profile and undermines the claim that the force is weaker than the classical result for the quoted parameters.

minor comments (1)

Abstract: the summary states the method and a qualitative conclusion but supplies no equations, error estimates, or checks against known limits, which hinders immediate assessment of the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying an important point about the regime of validity of our approximation. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to clarify the conditions under which our results hold.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Section 3: the leading quantum correction is obtained by replacing the spherical geometry with a locally flat slab and retaining only the first term in the Green's function series. When the source radius R satisfies mR ≲ 1 inside the screened region, higher-order curvature terms in the propagator are not parametrically suppressed; this can alter the sign or magnitude of the correction to the force profile and undermines the claim that the force is weaker than the classical result for the quoted parameters.

Authors: We agree that the planar-limit approximation requires parametric suppression of curvature corrections, which holds when mR ≫ 1 inside the screened region. For the specific parameter values quoted in the manuscript, where the quantum correction indicates a weaker fifth force, this condition is satisfied near the source. To address the referee's concern explicitly, we have revised Section 3 to state the validity criterion mR ≫ 1, to estimate the magnitude of the next terms in the Green's function expansion for our quoted parameters, and to note that a full spherical treatment would be required outside this regime. These additions clarify the scope of our conclusions without changing the reported results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: planar-limit Green's function expansion is an explicit approximation, not a self-referential definition or fitted prediction

full rationale

The paper presents an outline of a Green's function method to compute leading quantum corrections to the classical symmetron profile in the planar limit for a spherically symmetric source. The central claim that the force may be weaker than classical for previously excluded parameters follows from applying this expansion rather than from any input that is defined in terms of the output. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then relabeled as predictions, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation remains self-contained; questions about the validity of the planar approximation for spherical geometry when mR is not large constitute a separate correctness concern, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work relies on standard assumptions of quantum field theory in the presence of a background scalar profile and the validity of a perturbative expansion around the classical solution.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The symmetron model admits a well-defined classical background solution that can be perturbed quantum-mechanically.
Implicit in the use of a Green's function method around the classical profile.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1129 out tokens · 27116 ms · 2026-05-18T21:05:27.453699+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We outline a Green's function method for obtaining the leading-order quantum corrections to the classical symmetron field profile, in the vicinity of a spherically symmetric extended source, in the planar limit.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the renormalised tadpole contribution... one-loop field and force profiles

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

Nakada and S.V

H. Nakada and S.V. Ketov, Inflation from higher dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 123530

work page 2017
[2]

Ferrara, R

S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and M. Porrati, Minimal supergravity models of inflation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 085038

work page 2013
[3]

Cicoli, J.P

M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today , Physics Reports 1059 (2024) 1

work page 2024
[4]

Brax and A.-C

P. Brax and A.-C. Davis, Modified gravity and the CMB , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 023513

work page 2012
[5]

Perico, R

E.L.D. Perico, R. Voivodic, M. Lima and D.F. Mota, Cosmic voids in modified gravity scenarios, A&A 632 A52

work page
[6]

Joyce, B

A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, Beyond the cosmological standard model , Physics Reports 568 (2015) 1

work page 2015
[7]

Klimchitskaya and V.M

G.L. Klimchitskaya and V.M. Mostepanenko, The Nature of Dark Energy and Constraints on Its Hypothetical Constituents from Force Measurements, Universe 10 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Bernardo, R

H. Bernardo, R. Costa, H. Nastase and A. Weltman, Conformal inflation with chameleon coupling, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (2019) 027

work page 2019
[9]

Shaposhnikov and D

M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenh¨ ausern,Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy , Physics Letters B 671 (2009) 187

work page 2009
[10]

Ferreira, C.T

P.G. Ferreira, C.T. Hill and G.G. Ross, No fifth force in a scale invariant universe , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 064038

work page 2017
[11]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland, P. Millington and M. Spannowsky, Fifth forces, Higgs portals and broken scale invariance, JCAP 11 (2018) 036

work page 2018
[12]

Brax and A.-C

P. Brax and A.-C. Davis, Conformal inflation coupled to matter , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (2014) 019

work page 2014
[13]

Khoury and A

J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 171104

work page 2004
[14]

P. Brax, S. Casas, H. Desmond and B. Elder, Testing Screened Modified Gravity, Universe 8 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

Hinterbichler and J

K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening Long-Range Forces through Local Symmetry Restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 231301

work page 2010
[16]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland, C. K¨ ading and P. Millington, Symmetron scalar fields: Modified gravity, dark matter, or both? , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 043539

work page 2019
[17]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and E. Hinds, Probing dark energy with atom interferometry , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (2015) 042

work page 2015
[18]

Chiow and N

S.-w. Chiow and N. Yu, Constraining symmetron dark energy using atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083501

work page 2020
[19]

Sabulsky, I

D.O. Sabulsky, I. Dutta, E.A. Hinds, B. Elder, C. Burrage and E.J. Copeland, Experiment to detect dark energy forces using atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 061102

work page 2019
[20]

Brax, A.-C

P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, B. Elder and L.K. Wong, Constraining screened fifth forces with the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 084050

work page 2018
[21]

P. Yin, X. Xu, K. Tian, S. Lin, Y. Sheng, C. Yin et al., Experimental constraints on the symmetron field with a magnetically levitated force sensor , Nat Astron 9 598

work page
[22]

Fischer, C

H. Fischer, C. K¨ ading and M. Pitschmann, Screened Scalar Fields in the Laboratory and the Solar System, Universe 10 (2024) . – 43 –

work page 2024
[23]

Brax and M

P. Brax and M. Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 064015

work page 2018
[24]

Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems

M. Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems. II., Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 084013

work page 2021
[25]

Burrage, B

C. Burrage, B. Elder and P. Millington, Particle level screening of scalar forces in 1 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 024045

work page 2019
[26]

Sedmik, Casimir and non-Newtonian force experiment (CANNEX): Review, status, and outlook, International Journal of Modern Physics A 35 (2020) 2040008

R.I.P. Sedmik, Casimir and non-Newtonian force experiment (CANNEX): Review, status, and outlook, International Journal of Modern Physics A 35 (2020) 2040008

work page 2020
[27]

Upadhye, Dark energy fifth forces in torsion pendulum experiments , Phys

A. Upadhye, Dark energy fifth forces in torsion pendulum experiments , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 102003

work page 2012
[28]

Upadhye, Symmetron Dark Energy in Laboratory Experiments , Phys

A. Upadhye, Symmetron Dark Energy in Laboratory Experiments , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 031301

work page 2013
[29]

Cronenberg, P

G. Cronenberg, P. Brax, H. Filter, P. Geltenbort, T. Jenke, G. Pignol et al., Acoustic rabi oscillations between gravitational quantum states and impact on symmetron dark energy , Nature Phys 14 1022

work page
[30]

Brax and G

P. Brax and G. Pignol, Strongly Coupled Chameleons and the Neutronic Quantum Bouncer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 111301

work page 2011
[31]

P. Brax, G. Pignol and D. Roulier, Probing strongly coupled chameleons with slow neutrons , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083004

work page 2013
[32]

E.J. Weinberg, One-dimensional solitons, in Classical Solutions in Quantum Field Theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, pp. 6–37, Cambridge University Press (2012)

work page 2012
[33]

Burrage, B

C. Burrage, B. Elder, P. Millington, D. Saadeh and B. Thrussell, Fifth-force screening around extremely compact sources, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 8 (2021) 052

work page 2021
[34]

Derrick, Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles , Journal of Mathematical Physics 5 1252

G.H. Derrick, Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles , Journal of Mathematical Physics 5 1252

work page
[35]

Upadhye, W

A. Upadhye, W. Hu and J. Khoury, Quantum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041301

work page 2012
[36]

Brax and S

P. Brax and S. Fichet, Quantum chameleons, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104049

work page 2019
[37]

K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields , Physics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025) 101788

C. K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields , Physics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025) 101788

work page 2025
[38]

Burrage, C

C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington and M. Jir´ ı,Open quantum dynamics induced by light scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 076003

work page 2019
[39]

Callan and S

C.G. Callan and S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762

work page 1977
[40]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Green’s function method for handling radiative effects on false vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105021

work page 2015
[41]

Sedmik and M

R.I.P. Sedmik and M. Pitschmann, Next Generation Design and Prospects for Cannex , Universe 7 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Self-consistent solitons for vacuum decay in radiatively generated potentials, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 125022

work page 2015
[43]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Fluctuations about the Fubini-Lipatov instanton for false vacuum decay in classically scale invariant models , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 016001

work page 2018
[44]

W.-Y. Ai, B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Radiative effects on false vacuum decay in Higgs-Yukawa theory, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 076014. – 44 –

work page 2018
[45]

Goldstone and R

J. Goldstone and R. Jackiw, Quantization of nonlinear waves , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 1486

work page 1975
[46]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Constraining the effective action by a method of external sources, Nuclear Physics B 906 (2016) 105

work page 2016
[47]

Hinterbichler, J

K. Hinterbichler, J. Khoury, A. Levy and A. Matas, Symmetron Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103521

work page 2011
[48]

Perivolaropoulos and F

L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Gravitational transitions via the explicitly broken symmetron screening mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 043528

work page 2022
[49]

Llinares and L

C. Llinares and L. Pogosian, Domain walls coupled to matter: The symmetron example , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124041

work page 2014
[50]

Clements, B

K. Clements, B. Elder, L. Hackermueller, M. Fromhold and C. Burrage, Detecting Dark Domain Walls , 2308.01179

work page arXiv
[51]

Hinterbichler and J

K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening long-range forces through local symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 231301

work page 2010
[52]

Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory , Phys

S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory , Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929

work page 1977
[53]

Brax, A.-C

P. Brax, A.-C. Davis and B. Elder, Screened scalar fields in hydrogen and muonium , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 044008

work page 2023
[54]

Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , A

F.W.J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA (1997)

work page 1997
[55]

Andrews, R

G.E. Andrews, R. Askey and R. Roy, Special Functions, vol. 71 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

work page 1999
[56]

and, Orthogonality relations for the associated legendre functions of imaginary order , Integral Transforms and Special Functions 24 (2013) 331

S.B. and, Orthogonality relations for the associated legendre functions of imaginary order , Integral Transforms and Special Functions 24 (2013) 331

work page 2013
[57]

Coleman and E

S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888

work page 1973
[58]

Panda, M.J

C.D. Panda, M.J. Tao, M. Ceja, J. Khoury, G.M. Tino and H. M¨ uller, Measuring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom interferometer , Nature 631 515

work page
[59]

Bachs-Esteban, I

J. Bachs-Esteban, I. Lopes and J. Rubio, Screening mechanisms on white dwarfs: Symmetron and dilaton, Universe 11 (2025)

work page 2025
[60]

K¨ ading,Lensing with generalized symmetrons, Astronomy 2 (2023) 128

C. K¨ ading,Lensing with generalized symmetrons, Astronomy 2 (2023) 128

work page 2023
[61]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and P. Millington, Radiative screening of fifth forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 211102

work page 2016
[62]

Devoto, S

F. Devoto, S. Devoto, L. Di Luzio and G. Ridolfi, False vacuum decay: An introductory review , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 49 (2022) 103001. – 45 –

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Nakada and S.V

H. Nakada and S.V. Ketov, Inflation from higher dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 123530

work page 2017

[2] [2]

Ferrara, R

S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and M. Porrati, Minimal supergravity models of inflation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 085038

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Cicoli, J.P

M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today , Physics Reports 1059 (2024) 1

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Brax and A.-C

P. Brax and A.-C. Davis, Modified gravity and the CMB , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 023513

work page 2012

[5] [5]

Perico, R

E.L.D. Perico, R. Voivodic, M. Lima and D.F. Mota, Cosmic voids in modified gravity scenarios, A&A 632 A52

work page

[6] [6]

Joyce, B

A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, Beyond the cosmological standard model , Physics Reports 568 (2015) 1

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Klimchitskaya and V.M

G.L. Klimchitskaya and V.M. Mostepanenko, The Nature of Dark Energy and Constraints on Its Hypothetical Constituents from Force Measurements, Universe 10 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Bernardo, R

H. Bernardo, R. Costa, H. Nastase and A. Weltman, Conformal inflation with chameleon coupling, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (2019) 027

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Shaposhnikov and D

M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenh¨ ausern,Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy , Physics Letters B 671 (2009) 187

work page 2009

[10] [10]

Ferreira, C.T

P.G. Ferreira, C.T. Hill and G.G. Ross, No fifth force in a scale invariant universe , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 064038

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland, P. Millington and M. Spannowsky, Fifth forces, Higgs portals and broken scale invariance, JCAP 11 (2018) 036

work page 2018

[12] [12]

Brax and A.-C

P. Brax and A.-C. Davis, Conformal inflation coupled to matter , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (2014) 019

work page 2014

[13] [13]

Khoury and A

J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 171104

work page 2004

[14] [14]

P. Brax, S. Casas, H. Desmond and B. Elder, Testing Screened Modified Gravity, Universe 8 (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

Hinterbichler and J

K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening Long-Range Forces through Local Symmetry Restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 231301

work page 2010

[16] [16]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland, C. K¨ ading and P. Millington, Symmetron scalar fields: Modified gravity, dark matter, or both? , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 043539

work page 2019

[17] [17]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and E. Hinds, Probing dark energy with atom interferometry , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (2015) 042

work page 2015

[18] [18]

Chiow and N

S.-w. Chiow and N. Yu, Constraining symmetron dark energy using atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083501

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Sabulsky, I

D.O. Sabulsky, I. Dutta, E.A. Hinds, B. Elder, C. Burrage and E.J. Copeland, Experiment to detect dark energy forces using atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 061102

work page 2019

[20] [20]

Brax, A.-C

P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, B. Elder and L.K. Wong, Constraining screened fifth forces with the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 084050

work page 2018

[21] [21]

P. Yin, X. Xu, K. Tian, S. Lin, Y. Sheng, C. Yin et al., Experimental constraints on the symmetron field with a magnetically levitated force sensor , Nat Astron 9 598

work page

[22] [22]

Fischer, C

H. Fischer, C. K¨ ading and M. Pitschmann, Screened Scalar Fields in the Laboratory and the Solar System, Universe 10 (2024) . – 43 –

work page 2024

[23] [23]

Brax and M

P. Brax and M. Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 064015

work page 2018

[24] [24]

Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems

M. Pitschmann, Exact solutions to non-linear symmetron theory: One- and two-mirror systems. II., Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 084013

work page 2021

[25] [25]

Burrage, B

C. Burrage, B. Elder and P. Millington, Particle level screening of scalar forces in 1 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 024045

work page 2019

[26] [26]

Sedmik, Casimir and non-Newtonian force experiment (CANNEX): Review, status, and outlook, International Journal of Modern Physics A 35 (2020) 2040008

R.I.P. Sedmik, Casimir and non-Newtonian force experiment (CANNEX): Review, status, and outlook, International Journal of Modern Physics A 35 (2020) 2040008

work page 2020

[27] [27]

Upadhye, Dark energy fifth forces in torsion pendulum experiments , Phys

A. Upadhye, Dark energy fifth forces in torsion pendulum experiments , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 102003

work page 2012

[28] [28]

Upadhye, Symmetron Dark Energy in Laboratory Experiments , Phys

A. Upadhye, Symmetron Dark Energy in Laboratory Experiments , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 031301

work page 2013

[29] [29]

Cronenberg, P

G. Cronenberg, P. Brax, H. Filter, P. Geltenbort, T. Jenke, G. Pignol et al., Acoustic rabi oscillations between gravitational quantum states and impact on symmetron dark energy , Nature Phys 14 1022

work page

[30] [30]

Brax and G

P. Brax and G. Pignol, Strongly Coupled Chameleons and the Neutronic Quantum Bouncer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 111301

work page 2011

[31] [31]

P. Brax, G. Pignol and D. Roulier, Probing strongly coupled chameleons with slow neutrons , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083004

work page 2013

[32] [32]

E.J. Weinberg, One-dimensional solitons, in Classical Solutions in Quantum Field Theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, pp. 6–37, Cambridge University Press (2012)

work page 2012

[33] [33]

Burrage, B

C. Burrage, B. Elder, P. Millington, D. Saadeh and B. Thrussell, Fifth-force screening around extremely compact sources, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 8 (2021) 052

work page 2021

[34] [34]

Derrick, Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles , Journal of Mathematical Physics 5 1252

G.H. Derrick, Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles , Journal of Mathematical Physics 5 1252

work page

[35] [35]

Upadhye, W

A. Upadhye, W. Hu and J. Khoury, Quantum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041301

work page 2012

[36] [36]

Brax and S

P. Brax and S. Fichet, Quantum chameleons, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104049

work page 2019

[37] [37]

K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields , Physics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025) 101788

C. K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields , Physics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025) 101788

work page 2025

[38] [38]

Burrage, C

C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington and M. Jir´ ı,Open quantum dynamics induced by light scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 076003

work page 2019

[39] [39]

Callan and S

C.G. Callan and S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762

work page 1977

[40] [40]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Green’s function method for handling radiative effects on false vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105021

work page 2015

[41] [41]

Sedmik and M

R.I.P. Sedmik and M. Pitschmann, Next Generation Design and Prospects for Cannex , Universe 7 (2021)

work page 2021

[42] [42]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Self-consistent solitons for vacuum decay in radiatively generated potentials, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 125022

work page 2015

[43] [43]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Fluctuations about the Fubini-Lipatov instanton for false vacuum decay in classically scale invariant models , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 016001

work page 2018

[44] [44]

W.-Y. Ai, B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Radiative effects on false vacuum decay in Higgs-Yukawa theory, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 076014. – 44 –

work page 2018

[45] [45]

Goldstone and R

J. Goldstone and R. Jackiw, Quantization of nonlinear waves , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 1486

work page 1975

[46] [46]

Garbrecht and P

B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Constraining the effective action by a method of external sources, Nuclear Physics B 906 (2016) 105

work page 2016

[47] [47]

Hinterbichler, J

K. Hinterbichler, J. Khoury, A. Levy and A. Matas, Symmetron Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103521

work page 2011

[48] [48]

Perivolaropoulos and F

L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Gravitational transitions via the explicitly broken symmetron screening mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 043528

work page 2022

[49] [49]

Llinares and L

C. Llinares and L. Pogosian, Domain walls coupled to matter: The symmetron example , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124041

work page 2014

[50] [50]

Clements, B

K. Clements, B. Elder, L. Hackermueller, M. Fromhold and C. Burrage, Detecting Dark Domain Walls , 2308.01179

work page arXiv

[51] [51]

Hinterbichler and J

K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening long-range forces through local symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 231301

work page 2010

[52] [52]

Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory , Phys

S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory , Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929

work page 1977

[53] [53]

Brax, A.-C

P. Brax, A.-C. Davis and B. Elder, Screened scalar fields in hydrogen and muonium , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 044008

work page 2023

[54] [54]

Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , A

F.W.J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA (1997)

work page 1997

[55] [55]

Andrews, R

G.E. Andrews, R. Askey and R. Roy, Special Functions, vol. 71 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

work page 1999

[56] [56]

and, Orthogonality relations for the associated legendre functions of imaginary order , Integral Transforms and Special Functions 24 (2013) 331

S.B. and, Orthogonality relations for the associated legendre functions of imaginary order , Integral Transforms and Special Functions 24 (2013) 331

work page 2013

[57] [57]

Coleman and E

S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888

work page 1973

[58] [58]

Panda, M.J

C.D. Panda, M.J. Tao, M. Ceja, J. Khoury, G.M. Tino and H. M¨ uller, Measuring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom interferometer , Nature 631 515

work page

[59] [59]

Bachs-Esteban, I

J. Bachs-Esteban, I. Lopes and J. Rubio, Screening mechanisms on white dwarfs: Symmetron and dilaton, Universe 11 (2025)

work page 2025

[60] [60]

K¨ ading,Lensing with generalized symmetrons, Astronomy 2 (2023) 128

C. K¨ ading,Lensing with generalized symmetrons, Astronomy 2 (2023) 128

work page 2023

[61] [61]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and P. Millington, Radiative screening of fifth forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 211102

work page 2016

[62] [62]

Devoto, S

F. Devoto, S. Devoto, L. Di Luzio and G. Ridolfi, False vacuum decay: An introductory review , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 49 (2022) 103001. – 45 –

work page 2022