Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Enhanced Performance of FeFET Gate Stack via Heterogeneously co-doped Ferroelectric HfO$_2$ Films

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the vertical arrangement of Zr and Al dopants in HfO2 gate stacks controls which crystal phases form after annealing, and that a deliberately layered Zr/Al co-doping can deliver both high remanent polarization and…

desk verdict Solid extension of the same group's MFM co-doping work into MFIS stacks; the SiON/HZO interface finding is the strongest part, while the GIXRD-based phase claims need texture-aware reanalysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16768 v1 pith:FONQGP6F submitted 2025-08-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shouzhuo Yang , David Lehninger , Peter Reinig , Fred Schöne , Raik Hoffmann , Konrad Seidel , Maximilian Lederer , Gerald Gerlach This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectricHfO2Zr/Alco-dopingMFISgatestackFeFETenduranceremanentpolarizationatomiclayerdepositionphasecompositiondopantspatialarrangement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that in HfO2-based ferroelectric memory gate stacks, the vertical position of zirconium and aluminum dopants matters as much as their concentration. By depositing separate Zr-doped and Al-doped layers in different sequences, the authors steer the film's crystal phase composition after a high-temperature anneal. Electrical measurements show that a stack with the Zr-doped layer at the film's center matches the polarization of pure Zr-doped HfO2 while lasting far longer, and that co-doped stacks with an Al-doped layer next to the silicon interface combine the strengths of both mono-doped films. The paper also identifies a specific interface, SiON/HZO, as a reliability weak point to be avoided.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is heterogeneous co-doping by atomic layer deposition (ALD), which creates a deliberate vertical compositional gradient in the HfO2 film with distinct HZO and HAO layers. The argument rests on the difference in crystallization temperatures: HZO nucleates at temperatures as low as 300 °C, whereas HAO crystallizes above 650 °C. When HZO sits at the film's center, crystallization starts without the constraint of top/bottom interfaces, yielding more monoclinic phase; when HZO is confined to a top or bottom interface, adjacent capping layers stabilize the orthorhombic ferroelectric phase. This spatial control of phase competition, together with the dopant-diffusion behavior at the SiON interface, is what the paper uses to explain the measured differences in polarization, leakage, and endurance.

What would settle it

Perform texture-corrected diffraction measurements (e.g., pole figures or multiple tilt angles) on the five same stack layouts and compute absolute phase fractions; if the center-HZO stack no longer shows a significantly higher monoclinic fraction once orientation effects are removed, the claim that dopant arrangement alone controls phase composition would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that heterogeneous Zr/Al co-doping significantly enhances both the endurance and the remanent polarization (2Pr) of metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor (MFIS) gate stacks, compared to mono-doped HZO (HfZrO2) and HAO (HfAlO) films. Structurally, the phase composition of annealed HfO2 films is primarily determined by the spatial arrangement of dopants: placing the HZO layer at the center of the film promotes monoclinic phase formation, which improves cycling resistance but reduces polarization, while placing it at the top or bottom interface favors the ferroelectric orthorhombic phase through capping effects. Electrically, the co-doped stack with HZO at the center and HAO at the SiON interface shows high polarization and no degradation up to $10^{4}$ cycles, merging the advantages of the two mono-doped films. The paper further argues that a direct SiON/HZO interface should be avoided because Zr4+ diffuses into the SiON insulator, raising leakage and accelerating fatigue.

Load-bearing premise

The five compared films are otherwise identical except for the vertical ordering of the Zr- and Al-doped layers, and the X-ray peak ratios normalized to the o(111) reflection faithfully measure how much of each crystal phase is present without being distorted by preferred grain orientation or film-thickness differences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • FeFET gate-stack reliability can be tuned by ALD sequence alone, without introducing new materials or changing total dopant concentrations.
  • Co-doped stacks with an SiON/HAO interface and HZO at the center achieve high remanent polarization and stable switching up to at least 10^4 cycles, suggesting a practical recipe for nonvolatile memory gates.
  • Avoiding a direct SiON/HZO interface becomes a design rule for both mono- and co-doped HfO2 films, since Zr diffusion into the insulator is linked to premature breakdown.
  • The trade-off between memory window and endurance can be adjusted continuously by choosing where the low-temperature-crystallizing layer is placed within the ferroelectric film.
  • The o{200} texture enhancement seen in some co-doped and HAO films implies that crystallographic orientation can be influenced even without a textured bottom electrode, which may matter for scaling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension would be to apply the same layering concept to other dopant pairs (e.g., Si, La, Gd) and to superlattices of more than two doped layers, potentially expanding the phase-control knob beyond the Zr/Al pair studied here.
  • The texturing effect observed on the o{200} reflection in HAO and top-HZO films could be exploited to engineer polarization switching dynamics, although the paper only reports the correlation, not a causal model for how the texture arises.
  • A testable prediction is that the endurance benefit of central HZO placement should scale with the m-phase fraction; if texture-corrected phase fractions are measured, the correlation could be quantified and possibly used as a predictive metric for other dopant arrangements.
  • Because the paper shows that the SiON/HZO interface degrades both mono- and co-doped stacks, an alternative interfacial engineering (e.g., an ultra-thin Al-doped buffer) might recover endurance in bottom-HZO configurations, but this goes beyond what is demonstrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an experimental study of ferroelectric HfO2-based MFIS gate stacks in which Zr and Al dopants are placed in different vertical arrangements by ALD. Three co-doped configurations (HZO at the bottom, center, and top of the film) are compared with mono-doped HZO and HAO controls. The authors use GIXRD to characterize phase composition, ToF-SIMS to verify dopant distributions, and PUND and fatigue measurements to evaluate remanent polarization, leakage, and endurance. They conclude that the spatial arrangement of dopants primarily determines the phase composition of the annealed HfO2 films, that positioning HZO in the center of the film improves endurance at moderate polarization, and that the SiON/HZO interface should be avoided because Zr diffusion into the SiON layer degrades the stack.

Significance. If the central claims are confirmed, the work offers a practical ALD-based design rule for tuning phase fractions and endurance in FeFET gate stacks and provides a useful comparison of five stack configurations on the same platform. The strengths of the paper include direct ToF-SIMS confirmation of the intended dopant gradients, PUND-based separation of leakage and switching contributions, and fatigue data that qualitatively show large differences between stacks. However, the main structural conclusion depends on an uncorrected GIXRD peak-intensity normalization, and the electrical comparisons lack replicate statistics. These issues are load-bearing because the proposed mechanism (m-phase stabilization and Zr diffusion) is tied to the structural and endurance interpretations. With additional analysis of texture and statistics, the significance for FeFET gate-stack engineering could be solid.

major comments (4)
  1. [GIXRD quantitative comparison (Fig. 3)] The phase-fraction comparison normalizes the m(\bar{1}11) and o{200} peak intensities to I_o(111) without applying a texture or thickness correction. The paper itself attributes the variation of o{200} intensity to crystallographic texture or templating effects. Therefore the pronounced m(\bar{1}11) peak in the HZO-center stack could reflect a change in the orientation distribution of the orthorhombic grains rather than an increased monoclinic phase fraction. This directly affects the central structural claim and the subsequent m-phase endurance argument. Please provide a texture-corrected analysis (for example, multiple reflections, pole figures, or whole-pattern fitting) or explicitly reframe the conclusion as qualitative.
  2. [Electrical and structural measurements (Figs. 2-6)] Only one sample is reported for each of the five configurations, and no error bars or device counts are given for the GIXRD intensities, fatigue curves, or the 'statistical measurements' of endurance in Fig. 4b. Without replicates, the observed differences between the three co-doped stacks cannot be separated from run-to-run process variation, which weakens the claim that the spatial arrangement of dopants is the controlling factor.
  3. [Concluding paragraph] The statement that 'Zr/Al heterogeneous co-doping significantly enhances the endurance and 2P_r of MFIS stacks, compared to mono-doped HZO and HAO films' overstates the polarization result. According to Fig. 4a, the mono-doped HZO stack has the highest 2P_r, while the co-doped stacks have comparable but not higher 2P_r. The data support an increase in endurance relative to mono-doped HZO and an increase in 2P_r relative to mono-doped HAO, but not a simultaneous enhancement over both mono-doped controls. Please revise the conclusion to match the data.
  4. [Endurance mechanism (text after Fig. 7)] The claim that Zr4+ diffusion into the SiON layer degrades the interface and causes early breakdown is inferred only from an overlap in ToF-SIMS profiles and is not quantitatively linked to the measured leakage or endurance. Similarly, the suggestion that an increased m-phase fraction improves cycling resistance is drawn from the literature (Ref. 38) without direct evidence in these stacks. Please soften the causal language or add supporting data, such as SIMS quantification correlated with electrical stress results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, first sentence] The phrase 'The von Neumann bottleneck 1 of conventional memory devices have motivated' has a subject-verb agreement error; it should be 'has motivated.'
  2. [GIXRD data processing section] For reproducibility, please specify the X-ray wavelength, incidence angle, and instrument geometry used for the GIXRD measurements.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption says '(a) in positive direction and (b) in negative direction'; removing the redundant '(a)' and '(b)' would make the caption cleaner.
  4. [Sample fabrication paragraph] The abbreviation RTP is defined as rapid thermal process, but the acronym is used later without a reminder; adding '(RTP)' at the first occurrence is sufficient.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No material circularity: the structural and electrical claims rest on direct GIXRD, ToF-SIMS, PUND, and fatigue measurements, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study. Its central claims—that spatial dopant arrangement determines phase composition, that Zr/Al heterogeneous co-doping enhances endurance and remanent polarization compared with mono-doped films, and that SiON/HZO interfaces should be avoided—are supported by direct GIXRD, ToF-SIMS, PUND, and fatigue measurements on the five fabricated stacks. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then reused as a prediction; the GIXRD peak intensities are normalized to I_o(111) and reported as measured ratios, not as outputs of a model whose inputs include the claimed effect. The only self-referential element is the use of the authors' prior MFM study (Ref. 30) to interpret the mechanism by which HZO at the film center promotes the monoclinic phase. That citation is an external, peer-reviewed experimental precedent with stated assumptions; it is not used to generate the data or to define the measured quantities, and the MFIS observations in this paper are new and independently measured. Potential concerns about texture-induced GIXRD intensity artifacts or single-sample statistics are experimental-design and correctness risks, not circularity, because the measurements are not derived from the conclusions. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or mathematical derivations. It relies on standard domain assumptions about HfO2 phases and on fixed process parameters chosen from prior work. No free parameters are fitted to the data in this study.

free parameters (3)
  • Zr:Hf doping ratio in HZO layers = 1:1
    Chosen as an optimal ratio from prior work, not varied in this study. The central claim depends on this fixed composition.
  • Al:Hf doping ratio in HAO layers = 1:30
    Chosen as an optimal ratio from prior work, not varied in this study. The central claim depends on this fixed composition.
  • Annealing temperature and time = 800 C for 20 s
    Chosen to crystallize the films, not varied. The phase evolution and resulting electrical behavior depend on this fixed process parameter.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The orthorhombic Pca21 phase is the ferroelectric phase in doped HfO2.
    Invoked in the Introduction to connect structural phase to ferroelectricity, standard in the field.
  • domain assumption The monoclinic phase is thermodynamically stable and non-ferroelectric at room temperature.
    Used to interpret GIXRD phase fractions and their effect on endurance and polarization.
  • domain assumption The GIXRD peak assignments for o(111), o(200), and m(-111) are correct.
    Basis for comparing phase fractions across samples; the whole quantitative analysis relies on these assignments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced Performance of FeFET Gate Stack via Heterogeneously co-doped Ferroelectric HfO$_2$ Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FONQGP6F

@misc{pith2026250816768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced Performance of FeFET Gate Stack via Heterogeneously co-doped Ferroelectric HfO$_2$ Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FONQGP6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16768}
}
abstract

In this work, we explore the impact of spatially controlled Zr and Al heterogeneous co-doping in HfO$_2$ thin films tailored for metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor (MFIS) gate stacks of ferroelectric field effect transistors (FeFETs). By precisely modulating the vertical arrangement of Zr and Al dopants during atomic layer deposition, we introduce deliberate compositional gradients that affect crystallization dynamics during subsequent annealing. This strategy enables us to systematically tune the phase evolution and domain nucleation within the ferroelectric layer, directly influencing device reliability and performance. From a structural perspective, our findings demonstrate that the phase composition of annealed HfO$_2$ films in MFIS stacks is primarily determined by the spatial arrangement of dopants. From an electrical perspective, we observe significant enhancement of remanent polarization and endurance of the gate stacks through heterogeneous co-doping, depending on the spatial arrangement of dopants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of a 1T-FeFET and its gate structure featuring a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. GIXRD patterns of annealed samples of the experiment and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Quantitative comparison of the GIXRD patterns among all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Fatigue measurements on MFIS capacitors in depen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Extracted leakage current from PUND measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) P-V and (b) J-V loops extracted from PUND measurements while cycling of MFIS capacitors with Zr/Al mono- and co-doped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Vertical distribution of Zr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author J. Y. \ Park , author D.-H. \ Choe , author D. H. \ Lee , author G. T. \ Yu , author K. Yang , author S. H. \ Kim , author G. H. \ Park , author S.-G. \ Nam , author H. J. \ Lee , author S. Jo , author B. J. \ Kuh , author D. Ha , author Y. Kim , author J. Heo , \ and\ author M. H. \ Park ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202204904 journal jou...

    doi:10.1002/adma.202204904

  7. [7]

    Hoffman , author X

    author author J. Hoffman , author X. Pan , author J. W. \ Reiner , author F. J. \ Walker , author J. P. \ Han , author C. H. \ Ahn , \ and\ author T. P. \ Ma ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200904327 journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2957 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/a...

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.200904327

  8. [8]

    u ller , author T. B\

    author author J. M\" u ller , author T. B\" o scke , author D. Br\" a uhaus , author U. Schr\" o der , author U. B\" o ttger , author J. Sundqvist , author P. K\" u cher , author T. Mikolajick , \ and\ author L. Frey ,\ 10.1063/1.3636417 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 99 ( year 2011 ),\ 10.1063/1.3636417 NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.3636417

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Mulaosmanovic , author E

    author author H. Mulaosmanovic , author E. T. \ Breyer , author S. D\" u nkel , author S. Beyer , author T. Mikolajick , \ and\ author S. Slesazeck ,\ 10.1088/1361-6528/ac189f journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 32 ( year 2021 a ),\ 10.1088/1361-6528/ac189f NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Schroeder , author M

    author author U. Schroeder , author M. Park , author T. Mikolajick , \ and\ author C. Hwang ,\ 10.1038/s41578-022-00431-2 journal journal Nature Reviews Materials \ volume 7 ,\ pages 653 ( year 2022 ) ,\ note publisher Copyright: 2022, Springer Nature Limited. Stop

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    author author A. I. \ Khan , author A. Keshavarzi , \ and\ author S. Datta ,\ 10.1038/s41928-020-00492-7 journal journal Nature Electronics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 588 – 597 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    u ller , author T. Kirchner , author N. Wehn , author T. K\

    author author T. Soliman , author S. Chatterjee , author N. Laleni , author F. M\" u ller , author T. Kirchner , author N. Wehn , author T. K\" a mpfe , author Y. S. \ Chauhan , \ and\ author H. Amrouch ,\ 10.1038/s41467-023-42110-y journal journal Nature Communications \ volu...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Thomann , author A

    author author S. Thomann , author A. Mema , author K. Ni , \ and\ author H. Amrouch ,\ in\ 10.1109/IRPS48203.2023.10117810 booktitle 2023 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) \ ( year 2023 )\ pp.\ pages 1--5 NoStop

    2023

  6. [14]

    Xiang , author Y.-C

    author author H. Xiang , author Y.-C. \ Chien , author L. Li , author H. Zheng , author S. Li , author N. T. \ Duong , author Y. Shi , \ and\ author K.-W. \ Ang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304657 journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 33 ,\ pages 2304657...

    doi

  7. [15]

    u ckerhoff-Pl\

    author author A. Mehonic , author D. Ielmini , author K. Roy , author O. Mutlu , author S. Kvatinsky , author T. Serrano-Gotarredona , author B. Linares-Barranco , author S. Spiga , author S. Savel’ev , author A. G. \ Balanov , author N. Chawla , author G. Desoli , author G. M...

  8. [16]

    Houssa , author L

    author author M. Houssa , author L. Pantisano , author L.-A. \ Ragnarsson , author R. Degraeve , author T. Schram , author G. Pourtois , author S. De Gendt , author G. Groeseneken , \ and\ author M. Heyns ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2006.04.001 journal journal Materials ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Boescke , author J

    author author T. Boescke , author J. Heitmann , \ and\ author U. Schroder ,\ https://patents.google.com/patent/US7709359B2 title Integrated circuit with dielectric layer , \ ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  10. [18]

    o scke , author J. M\

    author author T. B\" o scke , author J. M\" u ller , author D. Br\" a uhaus , author U. Schr\" o der , \ and\ author U. B\" o ttger ,\ 10.1063/1.3634052 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 99 ( year 2011 a ),\ 10.1063/1.3634052 NoStop

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    author author S. S. \ Cheema , author N. Shanker , author C.-H. \ Hsu , author A. Datar , author J. Bae , author D. Kwon , \ and\ author S. Salahuddin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100499 journal journal Advanced Electronic Materials \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2100499 ( year 202...

    doi

  12. [20]

    u ller , author E. Yurchuk , author T. Schl\

    author author J. M\" u ller , author E. Yurchuk , author T. Schl\" o sser , author J. Paul , author R. Hoffmann , author S. M\" u ller , author D. Martin , author S. Slesazeck , author P. Polakowski , author J. Sundqvist , author M. Czernohorsky , author K. Seidel , author P. ...

    2012

  13. [21]

    u ller , author S. Slesazeck , author J. Ocker , author M. Noack , author J. M\

    author author M. Trentzsch , author S. Flachowsky , author R. Richter , author J. Paul , author B. Reimer , author D. Utess , author S. Jansen , author H. Mulaosmanovic , author S. M\" u ller , author S. Slesazeck , author J. Ocker , author M. Noack , author J. M\" u ller , au...

  14. [22]

    u nkel , author M. Trentzsch , author R. Richter , author P. Moll , author C. Fuchs , author O. Gehring , author M. Majer , author S. Wittek , author B. M\

    author author S. D\" u nkel , author M. Trentzsch , author R. Richter , author P. Moll , author C. Fuchs , author O. Gehring , author M. Majer , author S. Wittek , author B. M\" u ller , author T. Melde , author H. Mulaosmanovic , author S. Slesazeck , author S. M\" u ller , a...

    2017

  15. [23]

    o scke , author S. Teichert , author D. Br\

    author author T. B\" o scke , author S. Teichert , author D. Br\" a uhaus , author J. M\" u ller , author U. Schr\" o der , author U. B\" o ttger , \ and\ author T. Mikolajick ,\ 10.1063/1.3636434 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 99 ( year 2011 b ),\ 10.1063/1....

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author M. H. \ Park , author Y. H. \ Lee , \ and\ author C. S. \ Hwang ,\ 10.1039/C9NR05768D journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 11 ,\ pages 19477 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Wei , author L

    author author J. Wei , author L. Jiang , author M. Huang , author Y. Wu , \ and\ author S. Chen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104913 journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 31 ,\ pages 2104913 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wile...

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Zhou , author Y

    author author Y. Zhou , author Y. Zhang , author Q. Yang , author J. Jiang , author P. Fan , author M. Liao , \ and\ author Y. Zhou ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.041 journal journal Computational Materials Science \ volume 167 ,\ pages 143 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    u ller , author T. S. \ B\

    author author J. M\" u ller , author T. S. \ B\" o scke , author U. Schr\" o der , author S. Mueller , author D. Br\" a uhaus , author U. B\" o ttger , author L. Frey , \ and\ author T. Mikolajick ,\ 10.1021/nl302049k journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 4318 ( ye...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author M. H. \ Park , author Y. H. \ Lee , author H. J. \ Kim , author Y. J. \ Kim , author T. Moon , author K. D. \ Kim , author J. M\" u ller , author A. Kersch , author U. Schroeder , author T. Mikolajick , \ and\ author C. S. \ Hwang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adma....

    doi

  21. [29]

    Sang , author E

    author author X. Sang , author E. D. \ Grimley , author T. Schenk , author U. Schroeder , \ and\ author J. M. \ Lebeau ,\ 10.1063/1.4919135 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 106 ( year 2015 ),\ 10.1063/1.4919135 NoStop

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Lee , author R

    author author Y. Lee , author R. A. \ Broughton , author H. A. \ Hsain , author S. K. \ Song , author P. G. \ Edgington , author M. D. \ Horgan , author A. Dowden , author A. Bednar , author D. H. \ Lee , author G. N. \ Parsons , author M. H. \ Park , \ and\ author J. L. \ Jon...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Lederer , author P

    author author M. Lederer , author P. Bagul , author D. Lehninger , author K. Mertens , author A. Reck , author R. Olivo , author T. K\" a mpfe , author K. Seidel , \ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ 10.1021/acsaelm.1c00590 journal journal ACS Applied Electronic Materials \ volume 3 ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Mulaosmanovic , author P

    author author H. Mulaosmanovic , author P. D. \ Lomenzo , author U. Schroeder , author S. Slesazeck , author T. Mikolajick , \ and\ author B. Max \ ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  25. [33]

    u hnel , author K. Seidel , author T. K\

    author author M. Lederer , author K. Mertens , author A. M. \ Kia , author J. Emara , author R. Olivo , author Y. Raffel , author D. Lehninger , author T. Ali , author K. K\" u hnel , author K. Seidel , author T. K\" a mpfe , \ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ 10.1557/s43580-021-001...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Ma \ and\ author N

    author author T. Ma \ and\ author N. Gong \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  27. [35]

    u nb\" u l , author F. Sch\

    author author S. Yang , author D. Lehninger , author A. S\" u nb\" u l , author F. Sch\" o ne , author A. Reck , author K. Seidel , author G. Gerlach , \ and\ author M. Lederer ,\ 10.1063/5.0214873 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 125 ,\ pages 132903 ( year 202...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Lehninger , author T

    author author D. Lehninger , author T. Ali , author R. Olivo , author M. Lederer , author T. K\" a mpfe , author K. Mertens , \ and\ author K. Seidel ,\ in\ 10.1109/IFCS-ISAF41089.2020.9234879 booktitle 2020 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposiu...

    2020

  29. [37]

    Lehninger , author M

    author author D. Lehninger , author M. Ellinger , author T. Ali , author S. Li , author K. Mertens , author M. Lederer , author R. Olivio , author T. K\" a mpfe , author N. Hanisch , author K. Biedermann , author M. Rudolph , author V. Brackmann , author S. Sanctis , author M....

    doi

  30. [38]

    Mueller , author J

    author author S. Mueller , author J. Mueller , author A. Singh , author S. Riedel , author J. Sundqvist , author U. Schroeder , \ and\ author T. Mikolajick ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201103119 journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2412 ( year ...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Chernikova , author M

    author author A. Chernikova , author M. Kozodaev , author A. Markeev , author Y. Matveev , author D. Negrov , \ and\ author O. Orlov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.024 journal journal Microelectronic Engineering \ volume 147 ,\ pages 15 ( year 2015 ) ,\ note insulati...

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Dolabella , author A

    author author S. Dolabella , author A. Borzì , author A. Dommann , \ and\ author A. Neels ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202100932 journal journal Small Methods \ volume 6 ,\ pages 2100932 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/s...

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    Lederer , author A

    author author M. Lederer , author A. Reck , author K. Mertens , author R. Olivo , author P. Bagul , author A. Kia , author B. Volkmann , author T. K\" a mpfe , author K. Seidel , \ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ 10.1063/5.0029635 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 11...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Chae , author S

    author author K. Chae , author S. F. \ Lombardo , author N. Tasneem , author M. Tian , author H. Kumarasubramanian , author J. Hur , author W. Chern , author S. Yu , author C. Richter , author P. D. \ Lomenzo , author M. Hoffmann , author U. Schroeder , author D. Triyoso , aut...

  35. [43]

    Song , author S

    author author T. Song , author S. Estandía , author H. Tan , author N. Dix , author J. Gàzquez , author I. Fina , \ and\ author F. S\' a nchez ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100420 journal journal Advanced Electronic Materials \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2100420 ( year 2022 ) ,\ h...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Asapu , author J

    author author S. Asapu , author J. N. \ Pagaduan , author Y. Zhuo , author T. Moon , author R. Midya , author D. Gao , author J. Lee , author Q. Wu , author M. Barnell , author S. Ganguli , author R. Katsumata , author Y. Chen , author Q. Xia , \ and\ author J. J. \ Yang ,\ 10...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.