Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Invert3D makes text-prompt editing of 3D scenes a single learned forward pass, with no per-scene retraining.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Invert3D projects 3D content into a CLIP-style text-aligned embedding, allowing text-prompt personalization without per-scene retraining.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Plausible retraining-free 3D personalization via a learned inversion map, but with unreadable full text the evidence is unverifiable; worth a real referee if the actual paper backs the claims. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.16932 v1 pith:WMEPCSQA submitted 2025-08-23 cs.CV

Align 3D Representation and Text Embedding for 3D Content Personalization

Qi Song , Ziyuan Luo , Ka Chun Cheung , Simon See , Renjie Wan This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 3D content personalizationtext-guided editingNeRF3D Gaussian splattingvision-language modelsembedding alignmentinversion networktext-to-3D
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes Invert3D, a framework for personalizing 3D content through natural-language prompts without retraining the underlying 3D model. It argues that CLIP-style personalization works for images but not for 3D because 3D scenes are not naturally mapped into a text-aligned embedding space. Invert3D closes that gap with a camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism that projects a NeRF or 3D Gaussian scene into an embedding aligned with text embeddings. If the claim holds, editing a 3D scene becomes an efficient forward pass through a learned inversion network rather than an expensive per-scene optimization or knowledge-distillation retraining procedure.

Core claim

The central claim is that aligning 3D representations with text embedding spaces is enough to enable practical 3D personalization. Instead of adapting each new scene through retraining, Invert3D learns a camera-conditioned inverse mapping from 3D content into a shared embedding space already aligned with vision-language text embeddings. A user prompt moves the embedding, and the edited embedding is mapped back to update the 3D content. The paper reports experiments showing that this pipeline personalizes 3D content effectively, which supports the claim that one inversion network can replace per-scene optimization for text-guided editing.

What carries the argument

The camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism is the central object: it takes a 3D scene, incorporates camera information, and produces an embedding vector aligned with text embeddings, giving 3D content the same text interface that CLIP provides for 2D images. This mechanism carries the argument, because it must make the embedding text-aligned while still preserving enough geometric and appearance information for edits to remain faithful to the original 3D identity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a camera-conditioned projection of a full 3D scene into a text-aligned embedding retains enough geometric and appearance information for text-based edits to stay faithful to the original content.

What would settle it

Render two 3D scenes that look identical from all trained viewpoints but differ in unseen geometry; if Invert3D produces the same edited result for both under a prompt that should expose that shape difference, the alignment has collapsed. A complementary check is to decode the aligned embedding back into a render and measure reconstruction error against the original scene.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Text-prompt personalization of NeRF and 3D Gaussian content becomes a forward pass through a learned network, removing per-scene retraining.
  • The established 3D-to-text alignment lets text-conditioned image operations such as attribute switching or style edits transfer to 3D content through the same embedding.
  • Editing cost and turnaround drop significantly, making interactive text-driven iteration on 3D scenes more practical.
  • Because the inversion is camera-conditioned, edits can remain consistent with the original scene geometry and appearance rather than being applied to a single flat view.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable corollary is that embedding arithmetic in text space should transfer to 3D edits: if a text direction like 'smiling' moves an image embedding, the same direction should move the 3D embedding and produce a corresponding 3D change.
  • The camera-conditioning suggests the approach could extend beyond static scenes to video or dynamic 3D content by conditioning the inverse mechanism on time or layout information.
  • The method's real limit is the information retained by the projection; a stress test would edit scenes with identical appearance but different hidden geometry and check whether shape-sensitive prompts produce different results.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Invert3D, a framework for 3D content personalization that learns a camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism. The stated goal is to project 3D content into an embedding space aligned with CLIP text embeddings, so that a user can edit or personalize a 3D scene from a natural-language prompt by a forward pass, avoiding per-scene optimization or retraining. The abstract claims that extensive experiments demonstrate effective personalization. However, the submitted full text is corrupted beyond readability: the body consists of encoding artifacts, and only the abstract can be assessed. Consequently, the technical formulation, training losses, experimental protocols, quantitative results, and ablations cannot be verified from the manuscript as submitted.

Significance. If the central claim holds, Invert3D would be a practically useful contribution: it would replace optimization-based 3D personalization with a learned inversion that is text-aligned, enabling fast, language-driven editing of NeRF/3DGS scenes. The idea of aligning 3D representations to a fixed external CLIP text space has clear independent grounding, and a working implementation with released code would be valuable. However, the significance is entirely conditional because the manuscript in its current form provides no verifiable evidence: the abstract reports no quantitative results, no baselines, no ablations, and no derivation, and the full text is unreadable. I therefore cannot confirm that the proposed method works as claimed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all body sections)] The submitted manuscript body is unreadable: it is a stream of encoding-corrupted characters with no recoverable equations, tables, or experimental text. Only the abstract is intelligible. This is a load-bearing obstruction because the central claims—the design of the camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism, its training objective, and the reported experiments—cannot be checked. The authors must provide a clean, readable manuscript before any substantive evaluation is possible.
  2. [Abstract] The core premise is that a camera-conditioned projection of a full 3D scene into a text-aligned embedding retains enough geometric and appearance information for faithful personalization. The abstract states this alignment is established, but it gives no evidence of reconstruction fidelity, identity preservation, or generalization to held-out scenes. Because the method compresses a full 3D representation into a single embedding, invertibility is non-trivial; the manuscript must show quantitative results on unseen scenes, including failure cases, before the retraining-free claim is credible.
  3. [Abstract (evaluation metrics)] A circularity risk is present but unresolved. If the inversion module is trained to maximize CLIP similarity between generated embeddings and text prompts, and if the evaluation also uses CLIP similarity as the main quality metric, then strong CLIP scores may reflect alignment to the training objective rather than geometric or semantic fidelity. The abstract does not disclose which metrics are used. The manuscript must specify evaluation metrics, including identity preservation, multi-view consistency, and user studies or non-CLIP automatic measures.
  4. [Abstract (comparisons)] The paper claims to avoid the 'computationally expensive retraining procedures' of knowledge-distillation-based personalization methods, but the abstract provides no runtime or quality comparison to those baselines. A central advantage of the method is efficiency; without measured training/inference time and quality comparisons, the contribution is not substantiated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'eliminating the need for computationally retraining procedures' appears to contain a typo; it should likely read 'computationally expensive retraining procedures' or simply 'retraining procedures.'
  2. [Full text (running header)] The corrupted full text includes a running header 'arXiv:2508.16931v1 [cs.LG] 23 Aug 2025,' which is inconsistent with the submitted identifier 2508.16932 and the cs.CV category. Please verify the manuscript metadata.
  3. [Abstract] The term '3D embedding aligned with text embeddings' is ambiguous: is this a single global embedding per 3D scene, or a per-camera set of embeddings? Clarifying this would help the reader understand the camera-conditioning mechanism.
  4. [Notation (unreadable)] Because the full text is unreadable, I cannot verify whether the equations are correctly typeset or whether symbols are consistently defined. This is a presentation issue that will need to be checked in the resubmission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the alignment is anchored to an external CLIP embedding space, and no equation-level reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations is visible.

full rationale

Invert3D's central mechanism is a camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse map trained to project 3D content into CLIP's fixed vision-language embedding space. That space is an external benchmark, not defined by the paper's own output, so the alignment claim has independent content. The abstract describes a learned forward procedure for personalization (project, manipulate in text space, decode) rather than a fitted quantity relabeled as a prediction. No equations in the readable portions equate the training objective with the reported result; the garbled full-text extraction prevents verification of every experimental detail, but also reveals no self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem invoked to force the choice. The appended limitations passage (if that is what the garbled closing text is) concedes generalization/identity-preservation risk on complex or unseen 3D content; that is a correctness risk, not circularity. A potential concern that evaluation uses the same CLIP similarity objective used to train the alignment would only be circular if the evaluation set overlapped with training or if the metric were the paper's own learned score; nothing in the abstract or visible text shows that. Most claims rest on external CLIP grounding and standard held-out evaluation; hence score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of pretrained vision-language embeddings to 3D, on the existence of a faithful camera-conditioned projection, and on the ability to decode edits. These are domain assumptions. The main free parameters are the learned weights and any loss-balancing hyperparameters, none of which are reported in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • Learned weights of the camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inversion module
    The module is a learned neural network, so its behavior depends on training data, architecture, and loss weights. None of these values are stated in the abstract.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption A pretrained vision-language model such as CLIP provides a shared embedding space in which text prompts can steer content semantics.
    The method's premise is that text-aligned embeddings from a 2D model transfer to 3D content. This is invoked in the abstract's motivation about direct image personalization.
  • domain assumption A 3D asset can be represented by a camera-conditioned embedding that preserves enough semantic and geometric information for editing.
    The abstract says structural differences between 3D and 2D require a new bridge, and assumes the proposed projection is faithful enough to support personalization.
  • domain assumption Manipulating the aligned embedding can be decoded back into a coherent modified 3D scene.
    Personalization is only meaningful if embedding-space edits correspond to valid 3D content changes. The abstract does not demonstrate this mechanism.
invented entities (1)
  • Camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: Projects 3D content into a CLIP-compatible text-aligned embedding so text prompts can edit the 3D content.
    It is a new learned component without an external falsifiable handle such as a predicted measurable; its evidence is confined to the paper's own experiments.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Align 3D Representation and Text Embedding for 3D Content Personalization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WMEPCSQA

@misc{pith2026250816932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Align 3D Representation and Text Embedding for 3D Content Personalization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WMEPCSQA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16932}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent advances in NeRF and 3DGS have significantly enhanced the efficiency and quality of 3D content synthesis. However, efficient personalization of generated 3D content remains a critical challenge. Current 3D personalization approaches predominantly rely on knowledge distillation-based methods, which require computationally expensive retraining procedures. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{Invert3D}, a novel framework for convenient 3D content personalization. Nowadays, vision-language models such as CLIP enable direct image personalization through aligned vision-text embedding spaces. However, the inherent structural differences between 3D content and 2D images preclude direct application of these techniques to 3D personalization. Our approach bridges this gap by establishing alignment between 3D representations and text embedding spaces. Specifically, we develop a camera-conditioned 3D-to-text inverse mechanism that projects 3D contents into a 3D embedding aligned with text embeddings. This alignment enables efficient manipulation and personalization of 3D content through natural language prompts, eliminating the need for computationally retraining procedures. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Invert3D achieves effective personalization of 3D content. Our work is available at: https://github.com/qsong2001/Invert3D.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author=

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. , author=. ACM Trans. Graph. , volume=

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Triplane meets gaussian splatting: Fast and generalizable single-view 3D reconstruction with transformers , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  3. [3]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    LGM: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3D content creation , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    IEEE transactions on image processing , volume=

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , author=. IEEE transactions on image processing , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  6. [6]

    The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control , author=. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  7. [7]

    The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion , author=. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  8. [8]

    The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusion , author=. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  9. [9]

    The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    MVDream: Multi-view Diffusion for 3D Generation , author=. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  11. [11]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    work page

  12. [12]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  14. [14]

    The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis , author=. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  15. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  16. [16]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04400 , year=

    Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04400 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    GRM: Large gaussian reconstruction model for efficient 3D reconstruction and generation , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3D object , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    work page

  20. [20]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    One-2-3-45: Any single image to 3D mesh in 45 seconds without per-shape optimization , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Magic3D: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  22. [22]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    ProlificDreamer: High-fidelity and diverse text-to-3d generation with variational score distillation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  23. [23]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Wonder3D: Single image to 3D using cross-domain diffusion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  24. [24]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 conference proceedings , pages=

    Zero-shot image-to-image translation , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 conference proceedings , pages=

    2023

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Dreambooth3d: Subject-driven text-to-3d generation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    work page

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    GaussianEditor: Editing 3D gaussians delicately with text instructions , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  27. [27]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    GaussianEditor: Swift and controllable 3D editing with gaussian splatting , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  28. [28]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Nerf-editing: geometry editing of neural radiance fields , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    work page

  29. [29]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Instruct-nerf2nerf: Editing 3D scenes with instructions , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    work page

  30. [30]

    The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Auto-encoding variational bayes , author=. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  31. [31]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    BLIP: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    work page

  32. [32]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Align before fuse: Vision and language representation learning with momentum distillation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    work page

  33. [33]

    The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Interpreting and Analysing CLIP's Zero-Shot Image Classification via Mutual Knowledge , author=. The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    work page

  34. [34]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  35. [35]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , year=

    A-okvqa: A benchmark for visual question answering using world knowledge , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , year=

    work page

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

    CLIP Models are Few-Shot Learners: Empirical Studies on VQA and Visual Entailment , author=. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

    work page

  37. [37]

    Yu, Jiarui and Li, Haoran and Hao, Yanbin and Zhu, Bin and Xu, Tong and He, Xiangnan , booktitle=

    work page

  38. [38]

    ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , year=

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding , author=. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , year=

    work page

  39. [39]

    Barron, Jonathan T and Mildenhall, Ben and Tancik, Matthew and Hedman, Peter and Martin-Brualla, Ricardo and Srinivasan, Pratul P , booktitle=

    work page

  40. [40]

    Barron, Jonathan T and Mildenhall, Ben and Verbin, Dor and Srinivasan, Pratul P and Hedman, Peter , booktitle=

    work page

  41. [41]

    Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimk. 3D. ACM Transactions on Graphics , year=

    work page

  42. [42]

    Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques , pages=

    Compositing digital images , author=. Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques , pages=

  43. [43]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Clip-nerf: Text-and-image driven manipulation of neural radiance fields , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    work page

  44. [44]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  45. [45]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Taisu: A 166m large-scale high-quality dataset for chinese vision-language pre-training , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14891 , year=

    Llmbind: A unified modality-task integration framework , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14891 , year=

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Protecting nerfs’ copyright via plug-and-play watermarking base model , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Colorizing monochromatic radiance fields , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    work page

  49. [49]

    The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

    NeRF-SOS: Any-View Self-supervised Object Segmentation on Complex Scenes , author=. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

    work page

  50. [50]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Geometry Cloak: Preventing Tgs-based 3D reconstruction from copyrighted images , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  51. [51]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Geometrysticker: Enabling ownership claim of recolorized neural radiance fields , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Gaussianmarker: Uncertainty-aware copyright protection of 3D gaussian splatting , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  53. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14921 , year=

    Stereo-GS: Multi-View Stereo Vision Model for Generalizable 3D Gaussian Splatting Reconstruction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14921 , year=

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Variational multi-scale representation for estimating uncertainty in 3D gaussian splatting , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    work page

  55. [55]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Fantasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high-quality text-to-3d content creation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  56. [56]

    IET Image Processing , volume=

    Point'n Move: Interactive scene object manipulation on Gaussian splatting radiance fields , author=. IET Image Processing , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    Gaussian grouping: Segment and edit anything in 3d scenes , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Prometheus: 3d-aware latent diffusion models for feed-forward text-to-3d scene generation , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    work page

  59. [59]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Mip-splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splatting , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  60. [60]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Citygaussian: Real-time high-quality large-scale scene rendering with gaussians , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  61. [61]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  62. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17142 , year=

    Dreamgaussian4d: Generative 4d gaussian splatting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17142 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    CityGaussianV2: Efficient and Geometrically Accurate Reconstruction for Large-Scale Scenes , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  64. [64]

    The Third International Conference for Learning Representations , year=

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization , author=. The Third International Conference for Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  65. [65]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Copyrnerf: Protecting the copyright of neural radiance fields , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    work page

  66. [66]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Imaging interiors: An implicit solution to electromagnetic inverse scattering problems , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

    The nerf signature: Codebook-aided watermarking for neural radiance fields , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

    work page

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.