Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Probing Leptophobic Dark Sectors via Gravitational Wave Signatures

T0 review · 4 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that gauging baryon number as a $U(1)_B$ symmetry, made anomaly-free by new fermions, can break through a first-order phase transition whose bubble dynamics emit gravitational waves detectable by next-generation…

desk verdict Plausible but unverifiable: the abstract describes a standard U(1)_B model with a first-order phase transition and GW signal, but the supplied full text is a different paper, so the central claim rests entirely on what we cannot see. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17476 v2 pith:4BGUVOE2 submitted 2025-08-24 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Taramati , Lekhika Malhotra , Zafri A. Borboruah , Sudhanwa Patra This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO PACS 04.30.-w95.35.+d
keywords gaugedbaryonnumberU(1)_Bgaugesymmetrydarkmatterfirst-orderphasetransitiongravitationalwavesZ-primebosonanomalycancellationTeV-scalephysics
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a dark sector coupled to baryon number alone—not to electric charge—can be observed through the gravitational waves it emits when its symmetry breaks. In this model baryon number is promoted to a local $U(1)_B$ gauge symmetry, and cancelling the resulting anomalies forces new fermions whose lightest member is the dark matter. The paper argues that the $U(1)_B$-breaking transition is first order, so bubbles of the new vacuum nucleate, expand, and collide, producing a stochastic gravitational-wave background that next-generation observatories could detect. After scanning the parameter space against theoretical and experimental constraints, it identifies a surviving window with dark matter at 8–12 TeV, a $Z'$ at 16–24 TeV, and a scalar near 1–2.5 TeV. If true, gravitational-wave astronomy would become a direct probe of a leptophobic dark sector that current direct-detection and collider experiments can only touch marginally.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spontaneously broken $U(1)_B$ gauge symmetry together with its scalar sector. The model makes baryon number a local symmetry, adds fermions to cancel anomalies, and lets a scalar's vacuum expectation value give the $Z'$ its mass. If the finite-temperature effective potential produces a barrier between vacua, the transition proceeds by bubble nucleation; bubble walls and sound waves convert released vacuum energy into a stochastic gravitational-wave background whose peak frequency and amplitude are set by the transition temperature, the energy-release parameter, and the inverse transition duration. A numerical scan then ties this mechanism to the dark-matter relic density and to direct-detection constraints, selecting the 8–12 TeV window as the region simultaneously viable and detectable.

What would settle it

Compute the finite-temperature effective potential for the $U(1)_B$ scalar and check whether the transition is strongly first order ($\varphi_c/T_c$ large) in the claimed 8–12 TeV window; or search for the predicted stochastic background with next-generation interferometers and find only known astrophysical foregrounds. A second-order or crossover transition, or a null gravitational-wave observation at the predicted amplitude, would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the spontaneous breaking of a gauged baryon-number $U(1)_B$ symmetry can generate gravitational waves through the bubble dynamics of a first-order phase transition, at a strength within reach of planned observatories. Anomaly cancellation requires additional fermions; the lightest of these is the dark-matter candidate. Across a random numerical scan consistent with coupling-constant running, dark-matter relic density, and present direct-detection bounds, the paper finds that viable dark-matter masses are 8–12 TeV, with the $Z'$ mass in 16–24 TeV and the breaking scalar around 1–2.5 TeV. Recent direct-detection limits eliminate sub-TeV masses, while dark matter above 12 TeV would produce gravitational-wave signals too weak for future experiments. The paper presents gravitational waves as a complementary probe: the peak frequency and amplitude of the background encode the transition temperature and strength, giving access to the dark sector even when the $Z'$ is too heavy for current colliders.

Load-bearing premise

The claim collapses if the $U(1)_B$-breaking phase transition is not strongly first order in the parameter region that survives all other constraints; if the transition is instead second order or a crossover, the predicted gravitational-wave background disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A future gravitational-wave detection with the predicted peak frequency would be direct evidence that baryon number is a broken local symmetry, pointing to a $Z'$ in the 16–24 TeV range.
  • The surviving dark-matter window sits above the sensitivity of current direct-detection experiments, so testing this model requires either gravitational-wave observatories or new high-mass search strategies.
  • Dark matter heavier than 12 TeV is expected to be invisible to planned gravitational-wave experiments, so a null gravitational-wave search would not rule the model out; it would leave the high-mass branch untested.
  • Because the $Z'$ at 16–24 TeV and the scalar at 1–2.5 TeV sit near the edge of current collider reach, gravitational-wave and collider probes are complementary and a signal in one would sharpen the search in the other.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A measured gravitational-wave spectrum could in principle be inverted to estimate the transition strength and duration, giving a handle on the shape of the scalar potential that collider measurements alone would not provide.
  • The way the 8–12 TeV window is singled out as 'most interesting to test' suggests a selection effect: the scan is choosing masses that are loud enough to be seen, so the inferred window may be an artifact of detectability rather than of the underlying model.
  • The supplied body text is an unrelated manuscript about holographic displays, so the claims summarized here rest on the abstract alone; the scalar potential, scan details, and gravitational-wave spectra are not shown in the available text.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is submitted as arXiv:2508.17476 (hep-ph) with the title 'Probing Leptophobic Dark Sectors via Gravitational Wave Signatures.' The abstract claims that a gauged baryon-number U(1)_B extension of the Standard Model, made anomaly-free by additional fermions, can undergo a strongly first-order phase transition whose bubble dynamics source gravitational waves detectable by LISA and ET. It further reports a random numerical scan yielding a dark matter mass window of 8-12 TeV, a Z' mass of 16-24 TeV, and a symmetry-breaking scalar mass of 1-2.5 TeV, consistent with LUX-ZEPLIN, XENONnT, and future gravitational-wave sensitivity. The supplied full text, however, is arXiv:2508.17480, a computer-generated holography paper, and contains no physics content relevant to the abstract. Therefore the manuscript as submitted contains no derivation, numerical results, or benchmark data supporting any of the abstract's claims.

Significance. The research question is timely: identifying gravitational-wave signatures of anomaly-free U(1)_B models could complement dark matter and collider probes. However, the submitted manuscript provides no checkable evidence for the central physical claims. There are no machine-checked proofs, no reproducible scan code, no parameter-free derivations, and no quantitative predictions with estimated uncertainties. The claimed GW signal is conditional on a strongly first-order phase transition whose existence is asserted rather than demonstrated. As submitted, the significance of the work cannot be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (arXiv:2508.17476 vs 2508.17480)] The full text of this submission is a computer-graphics holography paper, 'Random-phase Wave Splatting of Translucent Primitives for Computer-generated Holography' (arXiv:2508.17480), with no equations, figures, or references related to the U(1)_B model, gravitational waves, or dark matter. Every claim in the abstract is therefore unverifiable from the submitted manuscript, and the paper cannot be evaluated as a physics contribution.
  2. [Abstract, GW signal claim] The abstract asserts that the spontaneous breaking of U(1)_B generates gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition, but neither the scalar potential, the thermal effective potential, nor the transition parameters (phase-transition strength alpha, inverse duration beta/H, nucleation temperature T*) are presented. The existence of a strongly first-order transition is the load-bearing premise for the entire signal, and it is unsupported by the submitted text.
  3. [Abstract, parameter scan] The claimed random scan over parameter space and the resulting mass windows (dark matter 8-12 TeV, Z' 16-24 TeV, scalar 1-2.5 TeV) are stated without any description of the scan methodology, benchmark points, constraint implementation, or uncertainty estimates. No subset of points is shown to satisfy all theoretical and experimental bounds simultaneously, so the quoted windows are not checkable predictions.
  4. [Abstract, anomaly cancellation] The abstract states that the model can be made anomaly-free by adding fermions and that the lightest component is a viable dark matter candidate, but the submitted text does not specify the fermion content, charge assignments, or anomaly-free conditions, nor the mechanism that ensures dark matter stability. These ingredients are essential for the model's viability and for the interpretation of the mass window.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, last sentence] The statement that the mass scales of interest are 'marginally accessible at current collider energies' is too vague; it should specify the collider, search channel, and projected sensitivity.
  2. [Abstract, Z' definition] The abstract introduces the Z' as the gauge boson of U(1)_B without defining the charge normalization for g_B; a precise definition is needed even at the level of the abstract.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The mass-window claim is partly a restatement of the scan's GW-sensitivity filter, but the central phase-transition derivation is unverified rather than circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract, parameter-scan paragraph and mass-window summary]
    "We perform a random numerical scan of the parameter space and derive the viable region consistent with theoretical bounds from running of the coupling constants, current experimental bounds from dark matter experiments such as LUX-ZEPLIN and XENONnT and sensitive to future gravitational wave experiments. We find that dark matter with mass of 8 - 12 TeV is the most interesting to test in future gravitational wave as well as laboratory experiments."

    The scan's 'viable region' is defined partly by requiring points to be 'sensitive to future gravitational wave experiments'; the paper then presents the masses of the points surviving that filter (DM 8-12 TeV, Z' 16-24 TeV) as the finding of which masses are 'most interesting to test in future gravitational wave' experiments. Insofar as this is offered as a prediction, the predicted GW testability is the same as the scan's input selection criterion: points without a LISA/ET-visible signal were excluded by construction, so the reported window being GW-visible adds no information beyond the filter. The window is not purely circular because it also encodes relic density, direct detection, and perturbativity constraints, which are independent inputs.

full rationale

No equation-level derivation can be checked: the full text supplied under the target identifier is a computer-generated holography paper (arXiv:2508.17480), not the hep-ph manuscript, so the claimed first-order U(1)_B phase transition, the thermal potential, and the gravitational-wave spectrum computation are not available for inspection. An unverifiable assertion is a completeness problem, not circularity. The only apparent circular structure is in the abstract's mass-window summary: the random scan is required to be 'sensitive to future gravitational wave experiments,' and the reported 8-12 TeV DM and 16-24 TeV Z' windows are the masses of the points that pass that filter, so presenting them as the masses 'most interesting to test' in those experiments partially restates a selection criterion. This is a mild tautological framing rather than a full reduction, because the same windows also depend on relic density, direct detection, perturbativity, and collider bounds. There is no self-citation chain, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The score 3 reflects one by-construction element in a secondary claim while the central physics claim remains independent in content, though currently unverified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

This ledger is limited to what the abstract reveals; the actual fermion content, scalar potential, and scan ranges were not available because the supplied full text belongs to a different paper.

free parameters (4)
  • U(1)_B gauge coupling g_B
    Not given in the abstract; it sets the Z' mass and contributes to the phase transition strength.
  • Scalar potential parameters (self-coupling and portal coupling)
    These determine whether the U(1)_B breaking is a strong first-order phase transition; the abstract does not list them.
  • New fermion mass parameters
    The lightest fermion is the dark matter candidate; its mass is scanned to yield the 8-12 TeV window.
  • Vacuum expectation value of the U(1)_B-breaking scalar = unknown; Z' mass quoted as 16-24 TeV
    The abstract reports the resulting Z' mass rather than the vev itself.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The added fermions cancel all U(1)_B and mixed anomalies without breaking the Standard Model.
    The abstract says the model 'can be made anomaly-free by adding a set of additional fermions' but gives no charge assignments.
  • domain assumption The scalar potential admits a strongly first-order phase transition in the viable parameter space.
    The GW signal depends on this; no potential is shown in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Gravitational wave spectra from bubble dynamics are given by the standard sound-wave/collision formulas.
    The abstract invokes 'bubble dynamics' without specifying the computation.
  • domain assumption Dark matter is a thermal relic produced by standard freeze-out.
    The 8-12 TeV mass window is interpreted in the context of the observed relic abundance.
  • domain assumption LUX-ZEPLIN and XENONnT limits apply with the standard astrophysical halo assumptions.
    The abstract cites these experiments as ruling out sub-TeV masses in the model.
invented entities (3)
  • Z' gauge boson of U(1)_B independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates the new baryon-number interaction; mass in the 16-24 TeV range.
    The predicted mass window gives a falsifiable collider/GW target, though the abstract calls current collider access marginal.
  • U(1)_B-breaking scalar independent evidence
    purpose: Breaks the symmetry and drives the first-order phase transition; mass around 1-2.5 TeV.
    The mass range is testable in future colliders and indirectly via the gravitational wave signal.
  • Additional fermions in the dark sector independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel gauge anomalies; the lightest one is the dark matter candidate.
    The 8-12 TeV dark matter mass is testable in direct detection experiments and future GW searches.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Leptophobic Dark Sectors via Gravitational Wave Signatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4BGUVOE2

@misc{pith2026250817476,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Leptophobic Dark Sectors via Gravitational Wave Signatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4BGUVOE2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17476}
}
abstract

We study a minimally extended version of the Standard Model where baryon number is gauged with a $U(1)_B$ symmetry. This model can be made anomaly-free by adding a set of additional fermions. The lightest component of these fermions behaves as a viable dark matter candidate. We show that the spontaneous breaking of $U(1)_B$ symmetry can produce gravitational waves via bubble dynamics resulting from a first-order phase transition, which can be detected in future gravitational wave experiments like LISA and ET. Such gravitational wave signatures can be used as a probe to constrain the model in future observations and complement dark matter and collider searches. We perform a random numerical scan of the parameter space and derive the viable region consistent with theoretical bounds from running of the coupling constants, current experimental bounds from dark matter experiments such as LUX-ZEPLIN and XENONnT and sensitive to future gravitational wave experiments. We find that dark matter with mass of 8 - 12 TeV is the most interesting to test in future gravitational wave as well as laboratory experiments. In the viable parameter space, the mass of the $Z'$ gauge boson associated with the $U(1)_B$ lies in the 16 - 24 TeV range, and the mass of the scalar associated with the symmetry breaking lies around 1 - 2.5 TeV scale. Recent results from LUX-ZEPLIN rules out mass scales below TeV in this model, while dark matter with mass larger than 12 TeV will not be sensitive to future GW experiments. Hence, the dark matter and mediator mass scales of interest are marginally accessible at current collider energies.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing mixed-state dark matter and flavor observables in a scalar-assisted baryonic gauge theory

    hep-ph 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a colored scalar S1 to a U(1)_B dark matter model correlates dark matter freeze-out with b→s μ+μ− observables, but the flavor amplitudes use a Z'–muon coupling that the model's zero-kinetic-mixing limit forbids.

  2. Gravitational Wave Probe of Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter Induced Radiative Neutrino Mass

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A radiative-seesaw model with singlet-doublet dark matter can satisfy neutrino, muon, flavor, relic, and direct-detection constraints while producing a first-order electroweak phase transition with gravitational waves...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

185 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity

    A. Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity. , Annalen Phys. 49 (1916), no. 7 769--822

    1916

  2. [2]

    Aghanim et al

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al. , Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209 arXiv:1807.06209 ]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Fukuda et al

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y. Fukuda et al. , Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562--1567, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9807003 hep-ex/9807003 ]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    SNO Collaboration, Q. R. Ahmad et al. , Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0204008 nucl-ex/0204008 ]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    K2K Collaboration, M. H. Ahn et al. , Indications of neutrino oscillation in a 250 km long baseline experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 041801, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0212007 hep-ex/0212007 ]

    arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    W. H. Julian, On the Effect of Interstellar Material on Stellar Non-Circular Velocities in Disk Galaxies , Astrophys. J. 148 (1967) 175

    1967

  7. [7]

    Tegmark et al

    SDSS Collaboration, M. Tegmark et al. , Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 103501, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723 astro-ph/0310723 ]

    arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Unified Lepton-Hadron Symmetry and a Gauge Theory of the Basic Interactions , Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1240--1251

    1973

Show all 185 references
  1. [9]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton Number as the Fourth Color , Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 275--289. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703--703 (1975)]

    1974

  2. [10]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, A Natural Left-Right Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2558

    1975

  3. [11]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Left-Right Gauge Symmetry and an Isoconjugate Model of CP Violation , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 566--571

    1975

  4. [12]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces , Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438--441

    1974

  5. [13]

    Georgi, H

    H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, Hierarchy of Interactions in Unified Gauge Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 451--454

    1974

  6. [14]

    Georgi, The State of the Art Gauge Theories , AIP Conf

    H. Georgi, The State of the Art Gauge Theories , AIP Conf. Proc. 23 (1975) 575--582

    1975

  7. [15]

    De Rujula, H

    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Hadron Masses in a Gauge Theory , Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 147--162

    1975

  8. [16]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons , Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193--266

    1975

  9. [17]

    Pais, Remark on baryon conservation , Phys

    A. Pais, Remark on baryon conservation , Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1844--1846

    1973

  10. [18]

    Duerr, P

    M. Duerr, P. Fileviez Perez, and M. B. Wise, Gauge Theory for Baryon and Lepton Numbers with Leptoquarks , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 231801, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0576 arXiv:1304.0576 ]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Patel and S

    U. Patel and S. Patra, Numerically analyzing self-interacting dark matter , http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11551 arXiv:2204.11551

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Fileviez Perez and M

    P. Fileviez Perez and M. Wise, Baryon and lepton number as local gauge symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 011901, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.1754 arXiv:1002.1754 ]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 82, 079901 (2010)]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fileviez Perez and M

    P. Fileviez Perez and M. B. Wise, Breaking Local Baryon and Lepton Number at the TeV Scale , JHEP 08 (2011) 068, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0343 arXiv:1106.0343 ]

    2011 arXiv

  14. [22]

    T. R. Dulaney, P. Fileviez Perez, and M. B. Wise, Dark Matter, Baryon Asymmetry, and Spontaneous B and L Breaking , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 023520, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0617 arXiv:1005.0617 ]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [23]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al. , Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6 061102, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03837 arXiv:1602.03837 ]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Agazie et al

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al. , The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L8, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16213 arXiv:2306.16213 ]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Afzal et al

    NANOGrav Collaboration, A. Afzal et al. , The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L11, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16219 arXiv:2306.16219 ]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971,...

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hindmarsh , Sound Shell Model for Acoustic Gravitational Wave Production at a First-Order Phase Transition in the Early Universe , Phys

    M. Hindmarsh , Sound Shell Model for Acoustic Gravitational Wave Production at a First-Order Phase Transition in the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (Feb., 2018) 071301

    2018

  19. [27]

    Arzoumanian et al

    NANOGRAV Collaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et al. , The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. 859 (2018), no. 1 47, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02617 arXiv:1801.02617 ]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aggarwal et al

    K. Aggarwal et al. , The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries , Astrophys. J. 880 (2019) 2, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11585 arXiv:1812.11585 ]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Brazier et al

    A. Brazier et al. , The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics , http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05356 arXiv:1908.05356

    1908 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Arzoumanian et al

    NANOGrav Collaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et al. , The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 905 (2020), no. 2 L34, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04496 arXiv:2009.04496 ]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Jinno, T. Konstandin, A. Roper Pol, H. Rubira, and I. Stomberg, Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions: from weak to strong , http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03651 arXiv:2409.03651

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Caprini, R

    LISA Cosmology Working Group Collaboration, C. Caprini, R. Jinno, M. Lewicki, E. Madge, M. Merchand, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Roper Pol, and V. Vaskonen, Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation , JCAP...

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition , JCAP 12 (2009) 024, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0622 arXiv:0909.0622 ]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041301, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2433 arXiv:1304.2433 ]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles , JCAP 09 (2008) 022, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1828 arXiv:0806.1828 ]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    G. W. Anderson and L. J. Hall, The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2685--2698

    1992

  29. [37]

    Schwaller, Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition , Phys

    P. Schwaller, Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 181101, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.07263 arXiv:1504.07263 ]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Breitbach et al

    M. Breitbach et al. , Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves , JHEP 07 (2019) 044, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11175 arXiv:1811.11175 ]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hashino, M

    K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko, and T. Matsui, Gravitational waves from first order electroweak phase transition in models with the u(1)_x gauge symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015053, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02947 arXiv:1802.02947 ]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Dasgupta, P

    A. Dasgupta, P. S. B. Dev, T. Han, R. Padhan, S. Wang, and K. Xie, Searching for heavy leptophilic Z': from lepton colliders to gravitational waves , JHEP 12 (2023) 011, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12804 arXiv:2308.12804 ]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Brdar, M

    V. Brdar, M. Finetti, M. Matteini, A. P. Morais, and M. Nemev s ek, PT2GWFinder: A Package for Cosmological First-Order Phase Transitions and Gravitational Waves , http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04744 arXiv:2505.04744

  34. [43]

    Brdar, A

    V. Brdar, A. J. Helmboldt, and J. Kubo, Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transitions: LIGO as a Window to Unexplored Seesaw Scales , JCAP 02 (2019) 021, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12306 arXiv:1810.12306 ]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Gr \'a f, S

    L. Gr \'a f, S. Jana, A. Kaladharan, and S. Saad, Gravitational wave imprints of left-right symmetric model with minimal Higgs sector , JCAP 05 (2022), no. 05 003, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12041 arXiv:2112.12041 ]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Karmakar and D

    S. Karmakar and D. Ringe, Gravitational wave imprints of the doublet left-right symmetric model , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 7 075034, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12023 arXiv:2309.12023 ]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Alanne, N

    T. Alanne, N. Benincasa, M. Heikinheimo, K. Kannike, V. Keus, N. Koivunen, and K. Tuominen, Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter: gravitational waves and direct-detection blind spots , JHEP 10 (2020) 080, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09605 arXiv:2008.09605 ]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Z. Chen, K. Ye, and M. Zhang, Asymmetric dark matter with a spontaneously broken U(1)' : self-interaction and gravitational waves , arXiv e-print (2023) [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11820 arXiv:2303.11820 ]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Abe and K

    T. Abe and K. Hashino, Gravitational waves from first-order phase transition in an electroweakly interacting vector dark matter model , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 015033, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13510 arXiv:2302.13510 ]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Srivastava, J

    T. Srivastava, J. Das, A. Ghosh, and A. Chaudhuri, Electroweak Phase Transition, Gravitational Waves and Collider Probes in Multi-Scalar Dark Matter Scenarios , http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05917 arXiv:2507.05917

  41. [50]

    Bringmann, T

    T. Bringmann, T. E. Gonzalo, F. Kahlhoefer, J. Matuszak, and C. Tasillo, Hunting WIMPs with LISA: correlating dark matter and gravitational wave signals , JCAP 05 (11, 2024) 065, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06346 arXiv:2311.06346 ]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Hosseini, S

    M. Hosseini, S. Yaser Ayazi, and A. Mohamadnejad, Gravitational wave effects and phenomenology of a two-component dark matter model , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 5 485, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00395 arXiv:2308.00395 ]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and S. K. Kang, A first order dark SU(2) _ D phase transition with vector dark matter in the light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data , JCAP 12 (2021), no. 12 039, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11558 arXiv:2109.11558 ]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and S. K. Kang, Gravitational waves from a dark U(1)D phase transition in light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6 063501, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01007 arXiv:2105.01007 ]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [54]

    V. V. Khoze and D. L. Milne, Gravitational waves and dark matter from classical scale invariance , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095012, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09535 arXiv:2303.09535 ]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [55]

    LUX Collaboration, C. F. P. da Silva, Dark Matter Searches with LUX , in 52nd Rencontres de Moriond on Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe , pp. 199--209, 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03572 arXiv:1710.03572

    2017 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Aprile et al

    XENON100 Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5988 arXiv:1207.5988 ]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Tan et al

    PandaX-II Collaboration, A. Tan et al. , Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 12 121303, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07400 arXiv:1607.07400 ]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Cui et al

    PandaX-II Collaboration, X. Cui et al. , Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 18 181302, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06917 arXiv:1708.06917 ]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Aprile et al

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment , JCAP 04 (2016) 027, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07501 arXiv:1512.07501 ]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Adriani et al

    PAMELA Collaboration, O. Adriani et al. , Cosmic-Ray Positron Energy Spectrum Measured by PAMELA , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 081102, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0133 arXiv:1308.0133 ]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Adriani et al

    PAMELA Collaboration, O. Adriani et al. , The cosmic-ray electron flux measured by the PAMELA experiment between 1 and 625 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 201101, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2880 arXiv:1103.2880 ]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Corti, The cosmic ray electron and positron spectra measured by AMS-02 , in 10th International Symposium on Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics , 2, 2014

    AMS Collaboration, C. Corti, The cosmic ray electron and positron spectra measured by AMS-02 , in 10th International Symposium on Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics , 2, 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0437 arXiv:1402.0437

    2014 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Fermi-LAT Collaboration, W. B. Atwood et al. , The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission , Astrophys. J. 697 (2009) 1071--1102, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.1089 arXiv:0902.1089 ]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [65]

    IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al. , Search for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Self-Annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of IceCube/DeepCore , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 9 627, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08103 arXiv:1705.08103 ]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [66]

    IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al. , Search for neutrinos from decaying dark matter with IceCube , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018), no. 10 831, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03848 arXiv:1804.03848 ]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, Mini Review on Vector-Like Leptonic Dark Matter, Neutrino Mass, and Collider Signatures , Front. in Phys. 7 (2019) 80, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06505 arXiv:1812.06505 ]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Bhattacharya, N

    S. Bhattacharya, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, Singlet-Doublet Fermionic Dark Matter, Neutrino Mass and Collider Signatures , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 3 035010, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03417 arXiv:1704.03417 ]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Ghorbani, Fermionic dark matter with pseudo-scalar Yukawa interaction , JCAP 01 (2015) 015, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4929 arXiv:1408.4929 ]

    K. Ghorbani, Fermionic dark matter with pseudo-scalar Yukawa interaction , JCAP 01 (2015) 015, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4929 arXiv:1408.4929 ]

    2015 arXiv

  60. [70]

    Dutta, S

    M. Dutta, S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, and N. Sahu, Majorana Dark Matter and Neutrino Mass in a Singlet-Doublet Extension of the Standard Model , Springer Proc. Phys. 277 (2022) 685--689, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.13857 arXiv:2106.13857 ]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [71]

    Barman, A

    B. Barman, A. Dutta Banik, and A. Paul, Singlet-doublet fermionic dark matter and gravitational waves in a two-Higgs-doublet extension of the Standard Model , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 5 055028, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12899 arXiv:1912.12899 ]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Konar, A

    P. Konar, A. Mukherjee, A. K. Saha, and S. Show, Linking pseudo-Dirac dark matter to radiative neutrino masses in a singlet-doublet scenario , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 1 015024, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11325 arXiv:2001.11325 ]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Konar, A

    P. Konar, A. Mukherjee, A. K. Saha, and S. Show, A dark clue to seesaw and leptogenesis in a pseudo-Dirac singlet doublet scenario with (non)standard cosmology , JHEP 03 (2021) 044, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15608 arXiv:2007.15608 ]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Sarazin, J

    M. Sarazin, J. Bernigaud, and B. Herrmann, Dark matter and lepton flavour phenomenology in a singlet-doublet scotogenic model , JHEP 12 (2021) 116, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04613 arXiv:2107.04613 ]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Ghosh, S

    P. Ghosh, S. Mahapatra, N. Narendra, and N. Sahu, TeV scale modified type-II seesaw mechanism and dark matter in a gauged U(1)B-L symmetric model , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 1 015001, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11951 arXiv:2107.11951 ]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, Singlet-doublet self-interacting dark matter and radiative neutrino mass , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 7 075019, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06847 arXiv:2112.06847 ]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [77]

    Mishra, N

    S. Mishra, N. Narendra, P. K. Panda, and N. Sahoo, Scalar dark matter and radiative Dirac neutrino mass in an extended U(1)B - L model , Nucl. Phys. B 981 (2022) 115855, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12569 arXiv:2112.12569 ]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [78]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, Singlet-doublet fermion origin of dark matter, neutrino mass and W-mass anomaly , Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022) 137196, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.09671 arXiv:2204.09671 ]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [79]

    WMAP Collaboration, D. N. Spergel et al. , First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 (2003) 175--194, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302209 astro-ph/0302209 ]

    2003 arXiv

  70. [80]

    Taramati, R. Sahu, U. Patel, K. Ghosh, and S. Patra, Singlet-doublet fermionic dark matter in gauge theory of baryons , JHEP 01 (2025) 159, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12424 arXiv:2408.12424 ]

    2025 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Fileviez P \'e rez, E

    P. Fileviez P \'e rez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li, and C. Murgui, Leptophobic Dark Matter and the Baryon Number Violation Scale , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 3 035009, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06646 arXiv:1810.06646 ]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [82]

    C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, Realistic models with a light U(1) gauge boson coupled to baryon number , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 484--493, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9501220 hep-ph/9501220 ]

    1995 arXiv

  73. [83]

    Fileviez Perez, S

    P. Fileviez Perez, S. Ohmer, and H. H. Patel, Minimal Theory for Lepto-Baryons , Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 283--287, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.8029 arXiv:1403.8029 ]

    2014 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Ma, Gauged baryon number and dibaryonic dark matter , Phys

    E. Ma, Gauged baryon number and dibaryonic dark matter , Phys. Lett. B 813 (2021) 136066, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13887 arXiv:2011.13887 ]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Fileviez Perez and C

    P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, Leptophobic Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 3 035041, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06365 arXiv:1904.06365 ]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Murgui and P

    C. Murgui and P. Fileviez Perez, Baryonic Dark Matter , JHEP 01 (2020) 064, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13436 arXiv:1910.13436 ]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [87]

    Duerr and P

    M. Duerr and P. Fileviez Perez, Theory for Baryon Number and Dark Matter at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 9 095001, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.8165 arXiv:1409.8165 ]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [88]

    El Hedri and K

    S. El Hedri and K. Nordstr \"o m, Whac-a-constraint with anomaly-free dark matter models , SciPost Phys. 6 (2019), no. 2 020, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02453 arXiv:1809.02453 ]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [89]

    Duerr and P

    M. Duerr and P. Fileviez Perez, Baryonic Dark Matter , Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 101--104, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3970 arXiv:1309.3970 ]

    2014 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, and P. Tunney, Phenomenological Constraints on Anomaly-Free Dark Matter Models , http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02503 arXiv:1807.02503

    arXiv

  81. [91]

    Baker et al

    J. Baker et al. , The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky , http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06482 arXiv:1907.06482

    1907 arXiv

  82. [92]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0108011 astro-ph/0108011 ]

    2001 arXiv

  83. [93]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044011, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3940 arXiv:1101.3940 ]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109901 (2017)]

    2011 arXiv

  84. [94]

    Crowder and N

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 083005, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506015 gr-qc/0506015 ]

    2005 arXiv

  85. [95]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435--2446, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0512039 gr-qc/0512039 ]

    2006 arXiv

  86. [96]

    Punturo et al

    M. Punturo et al. , The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

    2010

  87. [97]

    Hild et al

    S. Hild et al. , Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0908 arXiv:1012.0908 ]

    2011 arXiv

  88. [98]

    G. M. Pruna and T. Robens, Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), no. 11 115012, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1150 arXiv:1303.1150 ]

    2013 arXiv

  89. [99]

    Patra, W

    S. Patra, W. Rodejohann, and C. E. Yaguna, A new B - L model without right-handed neutrinos , JHEP 09 (2016) 076, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04029 arXiv:1607.04029 ]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Halzen and A

    F. Halzen and A. D. Martin, QUARKS AND LEPTONS: AN INTRODUCTORY COURSE IN MODERN PARTICLE PHYSICS . 1984

    1984

  91. [101]

    Li, Q.-S

    M. Li, Q.-S. Yan, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhao, Prospects of gravitational waves in the minimal left-right symmetric model , JHEP 03 (2021) 267, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13686 arXiv:2012.13686 ]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [102]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking , Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888--1910

    1973

  93. [103]

    Basler, M

    P. Basler, M. Krause, M. Muhlleitner, J. Wittbrodt, and A. Wlotzka, Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition in the CP-Conserving 2HDM Revisited , JHEP 02 (2017) 121, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.04086 arXiv:1612.04086 ]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [104]

    Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions , in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology , pp

    M. Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions , in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology , pp. 187--259, 1, 1999. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9901312 hep-ph/9901312

    1999 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3320--3341

    1974

  96. [106]

    R. R. Parwani, Resummation in a hot scalar field theory , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4695, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9204216 hep-ph/9204216 ]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 48, 5965 (1993)]

    1992 arXiv

  97. [107]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order , Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3546, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9212235 hep-ph/9212235 ]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 50, 6662 (1994)]

    1993 arXiv

  98. [108]

    Carena, G

    M. Carena, G. Nardini, M. Quiros, and C. E. M. Wagner, The Baryogenesis Window in the MSSM , Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 243--263, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3760 arXiv:0809.3760 ]

    2009 arXiv

  99. [109]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal\'azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: from perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves , http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02357 arXiv:2305.02357

    arXiv

  100. [110]

    M. E. Carrington, The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2933--2944

    1992

  101. [111]

    A. D. Linde, Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications , Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 37--40

    1981

  102. [112]

    S. R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory , Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929--2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  103. [113]

    Z. A. Borboruah and U. A. Yajnik, Left-right symmetry breaking and gravitational waves: A tale of two phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 110 (12, 2024) 043016, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05829 arXiv:2212.05829 ]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [114]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 876

    1981

  105. [115]

    V. K. S. Shante and S. Kirkpatrick, An introduction to percolation theory , Advances in Physics 20 (1971) 325--357

    1971

  106. [116]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No, and G. Servant, Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions , JCAP 06 (2010) 028, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4187 arXiv:1004.4187 ]

    2010 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2837--2851, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9310044 astro-ph/9310044 ]

    1994 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner, and R. Watkins, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4514--4535

    1992

  109. [119]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer, Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 063521, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603476 astro-ph/0603476 ]

    2006 arXiv

  110. [120]

    Caprini et al

    C. Caprini et al. , Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , JCAP 04 (2016) 001, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06239 arXiv:1512.06239 ]

    2016 arXiv

  111. [121]

    Kosowsky and M

    A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: Envelope approximation to many-bubble collisions , Physical Review D 47 (5, 1993) 4372--4391

    1993

  112. [122]

    Caprini and D

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves , Classical and Quantum Gravity 35 (8, 2018) 163001

    2018

  113. [123]

    S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Gravitational wave production by collisions: more bubbles , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (9, 2008) 022

    2008

  114. [124]

    D. J. Weir, Revisiting the envelope approximation: Gravitational waves from bubble collisions , Physical Review D 93 (6, 2016) 124037

    2016

  115. [125]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first-order phase transitions , Physical Review D 49 (3, 1994) 2837--2851

    1994

  116. [126]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition , Physical Review D 92 (12, 2015) 123009

    2015

  117. [127]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie, and G. White, Phase transitions in an expanding universe: stochastic gravitational waves in standard and non-standard histories , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (jan, 2021) 001

    2021

  118. [128]

    Lewicki, M

    M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, and M. Zych, Electroweak bubble wall expansion: gravitational waves and baryogenesis in Standard Model-like thermal plasma , JHEP 02 (2022) 017, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02393 arXiv:2111.02393 ]

    2022 arXiv

  119. [129]

    Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions , JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04615 arXiv:2002.04615 ]

    K. Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions , JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04615 arXiv:2002.04615 ]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [130]

    Caprini, M

    C. Caprini, M. Hindmarsh, S. Huber, T. Konstandin, J. Kozaczuk, G. Nardini, J. M. No, A. Petiteau, P. Schwaller, G. Servant, and D. J. Weir, Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , Journal of Cosmology an...

    2016

  121. [131]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 10 103520, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05871 arXiv:1704.05871 ]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 08990...

    2017 arXiv

  122. [132]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (12, 2009) 024--024

    2009

  123. [133]

    Bin \'e truy, A

    P. Bin \'e truy, A. Boh \'e , C. Caprini, and J.-F. Dufaux, Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves and eLISA/NGO: phase transitions, cosmic strings and other sources , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (6, 2012) 027--027

    2012

  124. [134]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. G. ...

    2017

  125. [135]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al. , Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 4 044001, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08697 arXiv:1607.08697 ]

    2017 arXiv

  126. [136]

    Reitze et al

    D. Reitze et al. , Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019), no. 7 035, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833 arXiv:1907.04833 ]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [137]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015 , Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015004, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.01076 arXiv:1505.01076 ]

    2016 arXiv

  128. [138]

    Aiola et al

    CMB-HD Collaboration, S. Aiola et al. , Snowmass2021 CMB-HD White Paper , http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05728 arXiv:2203.05728

    arXiv

  129. [139]

    CMB-Bharat Collaboration Collaboration, C.-B. A. I. C. Consortium, Exploring Cosmic History and Origin: A proposal for a next generation space mission for near-ultimate measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization and discovery of global CMB spectral dist...

  130. [140]

    K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Neutrino physics from the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66 (2016), no. 1 401--420, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-021908 https://doi.o...

    2016 doi

  131. [141]

    Alvarez et al

    M. Alvarez et al. , PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019), no. 7 194, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07495 arXiv:1908.07495 ]

    2019 arXiv

  132. [142]

    M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964--967

    1990

  133. [143]

    M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381--409

    1992

  134. [144]

    D. C. Kennedy and P. Langacker, Precision electroweak experiments and heavy physics: A Global analysis , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2967--2970. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 66, 395 (1991)]

    1990

  135. [145]

    T. Han, D. Marfatia, and R.-J. Zhang, Oblique parameter constraints on large extra dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 125018, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0001320 hep-ph/0001320 ]

    2000 arXiv

  136. [146]

    Navas et al

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 030001

    2024

  137. [147]

    Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders , Comput

    W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders , Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275--315, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0301101 hep-ph/0301101 ]

    2003 arXiv

  138. [148]

    Fileviez Perez, C

    P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui, and S. Ohmer, Simple Left-Right Theory: Lepton Number Violation at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 5 051701, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00246 arXiv:1607.00246 ]

    2016 arXiv

  139. [149]

    Alguero, G

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter , Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024) 109133, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14894 arXiv:2312.14894 ]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [150]

    E. A. et al. [XENON Collaboration], Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12562 arXiv:1805.12562 ]

    2018 arXiv

  141. [151]

    J. A. et al. [LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration], First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 041002, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03764 arXiv:2207.03764 ]

    2023 arXiv

  142. [152]

    Aprile et al

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 4 041003, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14729 arXiv:2303.14729 ]

    2023 arXiv

  143. [153]

    Conrad, Indirect Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: a compact review , in Interplay between Particle and Astroparticle physics , 11, 2014

    J. Conrad, Indirect Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: a compact review , in Interplay between Particle and Astroparticle physics , 11, 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1925 arXiv:1411.1925

    2014 arXiv

  144. [154]

    Z. A. Borboruah, D. Borah, L. Malhotra, and U. Patel, Minimal Dirac seesaw dark matter , http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12267 arXiv:2412.12267

    arXiv

  145. [155]

    Ackermann et al

    Fermi-LAT Collaboration, M. Ackermann et al. , Updated search for spectral lines from Galactic dark matter interactions with pass 8 data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 12 122002, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00013 arXiv:1506.00013 ]

    2015 arXiv

  146. [156]

    Acero et al

    Fermi-LAT Collaboration, F. Acero et al. , Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 218 (2015), no. 2 23, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.02003 arXiv:1501.02003 ]

    2015 arXiv

  147. [157]

    J. W. Foster, Y. Park, B. R. Safdi, Y. Soreq, and W. L. Xu, Search for dark matter lines at the Galactic Center with 14 years of Fermi data , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 10 103047, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07435 arXiv:2212.07435 ]

    2023 arXiv

  148. [158]

    Ackermann et al

    Fermi-LAT Collaboration, M. Ackermann et al. , Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241302, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.3546 arXiv:1108.3546 ]

    2011 arXiv

  149. [159]

    Collaboration, H

    H.E.S.S. Collaboration, H. Abdallah et al. , Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 11 111301, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08142 arXiv:1607.08142 ]

    2016 arXiv

  150. [160]

    Abdallah et al

    HESS Collaboration, H. Abdallah et al. , Search for -Ray Line Signals from Dark Matter Annihilations in the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with H.E.S.S. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 20 201101, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05741 arXiv:1805.05741 ]

    2018 arXiv

  151. [161]

    CTA Consortium Collaboration, B. S. Acharya et al. , Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array . WSP, 11, 2018

    2018

  152. [162]

    Abe et al

    CTAO Collaboration, S. Abe et al. , Dark matter line searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array , JCAP 07 (2024) 047, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04857 arXiv:2403.04857 ]

    2024 arXiv

  153. [163]

    Aaboud et al

    ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , Search for low-mass dijet resonances using trigger-level jets with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at s =13 TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 8 081801, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03496 arXiv:1804.03496 ]

    2018 arXiv

  154. [164]

    Aad et al

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al. , Search for new non-resonant phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 11 (2020) 005, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12946 arXiv:2006.12946 ]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 142 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  155. [165]

    Aad et al

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al. , Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 5 052005, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12606 arXiv:1911.12606 ]

    2020 arXiv

  156. [166]

    CMS Collaboration, Searches for dijet resonances in pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the 2016 and 2017 datasets ,

    2016

  157. [167]

    B. A. Dobrescu and F. Yu, Dijet and electroweak limits on a Z' boson coupled to quarks , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 3 035004, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05392 arXiv:2112.05392 ]

    2024 arXiv

  158. [168]

    Yu, Di-Jet Resonances at Future Hadron Colliders: A Snowmass Whitepaper , http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1077 arXiv:1308.1077

    F. Yu, Di-Jet Resonances at Future Hadron Colliders: A Snowmass Whitepaper , http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1077 arXiv:1308.1077

    arXiv

  159. [169]

    Ekstedt, R

    A. Ekstedt, R. Enberg, G. Ingelman, J. L\"ofgren, and T. Mandal, Minimal anomalous U(1) theories and collider phenomenology , JHEP 02 (2018) 152, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03410 arXiv:1712.03410 ]

    2018 arXiv

  160. [170]

    rep., CERN, Geneva, 2018

    CMS Collaboration, Searches for light higgsino-like charginos and neutralinos at the HL-LHC with the Phase-2 CMS detector , tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2018

    2018

  161. [171]

    Helsens and M

    C. Helsens and M. Selvaggi, Search for high-mass resonances at FCC-hh , tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2018

    2018

  162. [172]

    ILD concept group Collaboration, C. M. Berggren, New physics searches with the ILD detector at the ILC , PoS EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 713, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02386 arXiv:2111.02386 ]

    2022 arXiv

  163. [173]

    Curtin et al

    D. Curtin et al. , Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case , Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019), no. 11 116201, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07396 arXiv:1806.07396 ]

    2019 arXiv

  164. [174]

    Curtin and J

    D. Curtin and J. S. Grewal, Long Lived Particle Decays in MATHUSLA , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 7 075017, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05860 arXiv:2308.05860 ]

    2024 arXiv

  165. [175]

    Ariga et al

    FASER Collaboration, A. Ariga et al. , Technical Proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC , http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09139 arXiv:1812.09139

    arXiv

  166. [176]

    Ariga et al

    FASER Collaboration, A. Ariga et al. , FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC , http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04468 arXiv:1901.04468

    1901 arXiv

  167. [177]

    Abreu et al

    FASER Collaboration, H. Abreu et al. , Detecting and Studying High-Energy Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020), no. 1 61, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02310 arXiv:1908.02310 ]

    2020 arXiv

  168. [178]

    T. B. de Melo, S. Kovalenko, F. S. Queiroz, C. Siqueira, and Y. S. Villamizar, Rare kaon decay to missing energy: Implications of the NA62 result for a Z′ model , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 11 115001, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06262 arXiv:2102.06262 ]

    2021 arXiv

  169. [179]

    P. S. B. Dev, W. Rodejohann, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Searching for Z' bosons at the P2 experiment , JHEP 06 (2021) 039, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09067 arXiv:2103.09067 ]

    2021 arXiv

  170. [180]

    MOLLER Collaboration, Z. S. Demiroglu, The MOLLER Experiment: An Ultra-Precise Measurement of the Weak Mixing Angle Using Moller Scattering , PoS SPIN2023 (2024) 141

    2024

  171. [181]

    Kitahara, T

    T. Kitahara, T. Okui, G. Perez, Y. Soreq, and K. Tobioka, New physics implications of recent search for K_L ^0 at KOTO , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 7 071801, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11111 arXiv:1909.11111 ]

    2020 arXiv

  172. [182]

    Ertas, F

    F. Ertas, F. Kahlhoefer, and C. Tasillo, Turn up the volume: listening to phase transitions in hot dark sectors , JCAP 02 (2022), no. 02 014, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06208 arXiv:2109.06208 ]

    2022 arXiv

  173. [183]

    C. L. Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields , Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2006--2013, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4189 arXiv:1109.4189 ]

    2012 arXiv

  174. [184]

    Staub, SARAH , http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0538 arXiv:0806.0538

    F. Staub, SARAH , http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0538 arXiv:0806.0538

    arXiv

  175. [185]

    Porod and F

    W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM , Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458--2469, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1573 arXiv:1104.1573 ]

    2012 arXiv

  176. [186]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191--3203

    1991

  177. [187]

    Duerr, F

    M. Duerr, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, How to save the WIMP: global analysis of a dark matter model with two s-channel mediators , JHEP 09 (2016) 042, [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07609 arXiv:1606.07609 ]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.