Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

This paper claims that a single dark sector with singlet–doublet fermion dark matter and three Z2-odd singlet scalars satisfies neutrino, flavor, and dark-matter constraints while also generating an observable first-order electroweak phase

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 20:30 UTC pith:URQY44KE

load-bearing objection Useful combined scan of a known singlet-doublet radiative neutrino mass model, but the headline gravitational-wave predictions for the benchmarks are not computed at the benchmark parameters — a fixable but load-bearing flaw. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.19386 v2 pith:URQY44KE submitted 2025-11-24 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exhep-th

Gravitational Wave Probe of Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter Induced Radiative Neutrino Mass

Ujjal Kumar Dey , Santu Kumar Manna , Partha Kumar Paul , Sujit Kumar Sahoo , Narendra Sahu This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exhep-th
keywords radiative neutrino masssinglet-doublet dark matterelectroweak phase transitiongravitational wavesmuon g-2charged lepton flavor violationZ2-odd singlet scalarsdark matter direct detection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to show that one TeV-scale dark sector can do five jobs at once: generate sub-eV neutrino masses radiatively, produce the observed dark-matter relic abundance, stay within muon (g−2) and lepton-flavor-violation limits, evade direct detection, and render the electroweak phase transition strongly first-order so that it emits gravitational waves. The link is the quartic couplings between the SM Higgs and three Z2-odd singlet scalars, which reshape the high-temperature Higgs potential while the same scalars and their fermionic partners run in the loop that gives neutrinos mass. The authors identify a combined parameter region—DM mass roughly 100 GeV to 900 GeV, singlet–doublet mixing sinθ between about 10^-3 and 0.1, and at least one scalar below about 1 TeV—that satisfies all these constraints and predicts gravitational-wave peak amplitudes h²Ω in the range of about 10^-14 to 10^-13 at frequencies around 10^-4 to 10^-3 Hz, within reach of planned space-based observatories. A sympathetic reader would take the main payoff to be a concrete multi-observable target: the same region that fixes neutrino masses and dark matter also tells future gravitational-wave detectors where to look.

Core claim

The central claim is that the radiative neutrino mass model with singlet–doublet Majorana dark matter and three Z2-odd singlet scalars is predictive across sectors. The same benchmark points that reproduce neutrino oscillation data, keep µ→eγ below the MEG-II bound, give the observed relic density, and pass LZ direct detection also yield a strong first-order electroweak phase transition with gravitational-wave peak amplitudes h²Ω_peak ≈ 1.15×10^-13 at about 10^-3 Hz (BP1), 3.39×10^-14 at 3.75×10^-4 Hz (BP2), and 9.11×10^-14 at 1.87×10^-4 Hz (BP3). The new ingredient is the set of couplings λ_hi between the SM Higgs and the φ_i scalars, which create the barrier needed for a first-order transi

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of SM-Higgs–singlet-scalar quartic couplings λ_hi, especially λ_h1. These couplings enter the finite-temperature effective potential through field-dependent and thermal screening masses; when large enough (λ_h1 roughly 3–7) they create a barrier between the symmetric and broken phases, turning the electroweak phase transition first-order. The rest of the machinery is the daisy-resummed one-loop effective potential with counter-terms, used to compute T_c, v_c/T_c, α, β/H_n, and the gravitational-wave spectrum from bubble collisions, sound waves, and turbulence. On the dark-matter side, the singlet–doublet fermion mass matrix fixes the mixing angle sinθ and m

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational-wave parameters are computed at a light benchmark (200/220 GeV, sinθ = 10^-3) and then assumed to hold at the heavy benchmark points (M_DM = 445–648 GeV, sinθ = 0.035–0.1) without recomputing the phase transition there.

What would settle it

Recompute T_c, v_c/T_c, α, and β/H_n from the full daisy-resummed effective potential at the three benchmark points in Table 3 using each benchmark's M_DM, ΔM, sinθ, and λ_hi values. If v_c/T_c falls below about 1, or if the derived h²Ω_peak drops below the BBO/DECIGO sensitivity curves, the paper's central gravitational-wave prediction is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A strong first-order electroweak phase transition and a TeV-scale dark sector become linked: the same λ_hi values that make the transition first-order also set the scalar mass scale, so measuring either constrains the other.
  • Future mHz-band gravitational-wave observatories (BBO, DECIGO, µAres, and possibly LISA) have a concrete amplitude target of h²Ω ≈ 10^-14–10^-13 from this model.
  • The combined constraints narrow the dark-matter mass to roughly 100 GeV–1 TeV and the singlet–doublet mixing to about 10^-3–0.1, with sinθ above about 0.3 already excluded by direct detection.
  • The requirement that at least one singlet scalar stay below about 1 TeV for a first-order transition limits how heavy the neutrino-loop scalars can be, putting the new states within collider and displaced-vertex reach.
  • A tighter µ→eγ bound pushes y_1e down, which through the neutrino-mass relation forces sinθ up for fixed mass splitting, shifting both the relic-density and gravitational-wave predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper assumes runaway bubble walls (v_w ≈ 1) when converting α and β/H_n into gravitational-wave spectra; realistic subsonic walls would suppress the sound-wave and turbulence contributions, so the quoted BBO/DECIGO reach is likely an upper envelope until v_w is computed.
  • The benchmark points show a correlation between larger sinθ and larger gravitational-wave amplitude, but larger sinθ also raises direct-detection cross-sections; a combined direct-detection plus gravitational-wave projection would carve the surviving parameter space more sharply than either channel alone.
  • The model implies a concrete testable chain: stronger flavor limits on µ→eγ would, for fixed mass splittings, increase the mixing angle and hence the gravitational-wave amplitude, until direct detection closes the window—tying three experimental frontiers together.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates an extension of the Standard Model with a Z2-odd singlet Majorana fermion chi, a vector-like doublet fermion Psi, and three Z2-odd singlet scalars phi_i. These states generate one-loop Majorana neutrino masses, provide a singlet-doublet Majorana dark-matter candidate, and contribute to (g-2)_mu and charged lepton flavor violation. The authors use neutrino oscillation data through Casas-Ibarra, impose constraints from MEG-II, relic density, and direct detection, and then study the finite-temperature electroweak phase transition with CosmoTransitions. They report a strong first-order phase transition and gravitational-wave peak amplitudes h^2 Omega_peak ~ 1e-13 in the 1e-4 to 1e-3 Hz band, within reach of BBO, DECIGO, muAres, and LISA, and give three benchmark points satisfying all constraints.

Significance. If the gravitational-wave predictions survive at the quoted benchmark points, the paper would establish a striking interconnection among radiative neutrino mass, dark matter, flavor physics, and gravitational-wave observatories. Strengths include the use of public codes (micrOMEGAs, CosmoTransitions), a clear enumeration of benchmark points, and the inclusion of several complementary constraints. However, the central claim is currently supported by a phase-transition scan performed at different fermion input parameters than those of the benchmarks, and by a scalar potential in which the cross-quartic terms are silently omitted. These issues must be resolved before the headline gravitational-wave amplitudes can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2 and Table 3] The FOPT/GW scan fixes M_chi = 200 GeV, M_Psi = 220 GeV, and sinθ = 10^-3, which via Eqs. (2.5)-(2.7) forces the fermion mass splitting to about 20 GeV. The benchmark points in Table 3 use M_DM = 445-648 GeV, ΔM = 33-152 GeV, and sinθ = 0.035-0.1; e.g., BP1 needs Lagrangian masses M_Psi ≈ 495 GeV, M_chi ≈ 445 GeV. The effective-potential fermion contributions (B.12-B.13), the thermal mass (B.23), and the daisy terms all depend on these parameters. The paper never recomputes v_c/T_c, α, β/H_n, or h^2Ω_peak at the actual benchmark parameters; marking the BPs on Fig. 8 only places them in a region generated with different fermion input. Please rerun the finite-temperature calculation at the BPs or demonstrate quantitatively that the fermionic feedback is negligible.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B.8)-(B.10)] The scalar potential in Eq. (2.2) contains the cross-quartic terms λh12 H†H φ1φ2, λh13 H†H φ1φ3, and λh23 H†H φ2φ3. Once H acquires a background value, these terms contribute off-diagonal entries to the field-dependent scalar mass matrix, which in turn enter the Coleman-Weinberg potential, the thermal potential, and the daisy resummation. The field-dependent masses in Eqs. (B.8)-(B.10) omit these terms, and no statement in the text sets the λhij couplings to zero. The FOPT calculation therefore effectively uses a different scalar potential from the one defined in Section 2. If these couplings are intended to be zero, this must be stated explicitly and the Lagrangian truncated accordingly; otherwise the quoted α, β/H_n, and h^2Ω_peak are not derived from the model presented.
  3. [Table 3 / Fig. 8] Table 3 lists α, β/H_n, and h^2Ω_peak for the three benchmarks, but does not report the corresponding v_c/T_c ratio, although v_c/T_c ≳ 1 is the criterion used in Section 5.2. Since the scan region in Fig. 8 was generated at different fermion parameters, it would be useful to give T_c, T_n, and v_c/T_c for each benchmark, together with the code inputs used, so that the claim that the BPs give a strong FOPT can be checked directly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6, text after Table 3] The text says 'we show three benchmark points' but then 'These two points are shown with black ⋆ in Fig. 8.' This is likely 'These three points'—please fix.
  2. [Section 5.2, Fig. 8 caption] The sentence 'The each color code is for addition of each generation of scalars' is grammatically unclear. Clarify which color corresponds to one, two, or three scalars.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'an one loop radiative neutrino mass model' should be 'a one-loop radiative neutrino mass model.'
  4. [Section 5.2] The description of the gray region in Fig. 8 as 'is allowed to give VEV to φ’s' is garbled; the intended meaning seems to be that the gray region is excluded because it would allow φ to acquire a VEV.
  5. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.23)] The fermionic contribution to the Higgs thermal mass is written with (ΔM sin^2 2θ / v)^2. For consistency with the rest of the paper, please specify whether this term is derived from the full set of field-dependent fermion masses (B.12)-(B.13) and confirm that the scan's fixed parameters are the ones used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper is a constrained scan; FOPT/GW benchmarks have a validation gap, but no equation reduces the headline claim to its inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is a constrained parameter-space scan rather than a derivation from a single principle. Neutrino oscillation data enter through the Casas-Ibarra parameterization (Eq. 3.4), so neutrino masses are inputs rather than predicted outputs; the paper's predictivity claim rests on combining these inputs with independent constraints. The relic density is computed with micrOMEGAs against external Planck data; direct detection is checked against XENONnT/LZ; cLFV is checked against MEG-II; (g−2)_mu is constrained by the experimental upper limit. The FOPT/GW analysis uses CosmoTransitions on the finite-temperature effective potential, and the quoted alpha, beta/H_n, and h^2 Omega_peak are outputs of that calculation. The main concern is a validation gap rather than circularity: in Sec. 5.2 the FOPT scan fixes M_chi = 200 GeV, M_Psi = 220 GeV, sin(theta) = 10^-3, while Table 3 benchmarks have M_DM = 445–648 GeV and sin(theta) = 0.035–0.1; the paper never recomputes v_c/T_c, alpha, beta/H_n, or the GW spectrum at those benchmark parameters. This is an omitted calculation / unsupported extrapolation, not an identity between input and output. The self-citations [49,50] supply Boltzmann equations and prior SDDM studies, but the central conclusions are tested with external codes and external data, so those citations are not load-bearing in a way that forces the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central computation relies on many free dark-sector parameters. The most important are the Higgs-singlet quartics lambda_h1-3, scanned to values 1.6-6.6 to produce FOPT, and the Casas-Ibarra Yukawa matrix fitted to neutrino data. The Z2 symmetry and standard cosmology are domain assumptions. The paper also implicitly treats the scalar field-dependent masses as diagonal, effectively dropping the lambda_h12, lambda_h13, lambda_h23 terms present in Eq. (2.2), without stating so. The new particles are not invented in this paper but inherited from a known model class; they have no independent experimental confirmation.

free parameters (7)
  • M_phi1, M_phi2, M_phi3 (singlet scalar masses) = BP1: 468.56, 511.39, 536.31 GeV; scans: 200-1000, 200-2000, 200-3000 GeV
    Free masses that set the neutrino loop scale and also control FOPT strength and DM co-annihilation.
  • lambda_h1, lambda_h2, lambda_h3 (Higgs-singlet quartic couplings) = BP1: 3.274, 4.021, 3.568; scanned in [0.1,10]
    These couplings are the key drivers of the first-order phase transition and the GW spectra; they are chosen by hand in the scan and define the benchmark predictions.
  • sin theta, Delta M, M_DM (singlet-doublet mixing and mass splittings) = BP1: sin theta=0.1, Delta M=50 GeV, M_DM=445 GeV; BP2 and BP3 differ
    These dark-sector parameters are scanned to satisfy relic density, direct detection, cLFV, and neutrino constraints.
  • Delta M' = M_phi1 - M_DM = BP1: about 23.6 GeV; kept below 100 GeV in part of the scan
    Controls the DM-phi1 co-annihilation channels that extend the viable relic parameter space.
  • Casas-Ibarra Yukawa matrix y_i_alpha = Not tabulated; fitted through complex orthogonal angles alpha, beta, gamma
    Fitted to neutrino oscillation data via Eq. (3.4) and then constrained by cLFV and g-2; central to neutrino mass generation.
  • M_chi, M_Psi (Lagrangian fermion masses) = Fixed to 200 GeV and 220 GeV in the FOPT scan
    These are free in the model but are fixed to one point for the FOPT scan, even though benchmarks imply different physical masses.
  • lambda_i, lambda_12, lambda_13, lambda_23 = Set to 10^-4 in the FOPT scan
    Small scalar self-quartics are chosen by hand to simplify the phase-transition scan.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The global Z2 symmetry is exact, so the lightest Z2-odd state is stable DM and the scalar singlets never get VEVs.
    Required for DM stability and for treating the FOPT with phi_i at zero VEV; used throughout Sections 2 and 5.
  • domain assumption The early universe is radiation-dominated with standard Hubble expansion and thermal freeze-out; no entropy injection.
    The Boltzmann equations (4.1)-(4.2) and the relic-density calculations assume standard cosmology.
  • standard math The high-temperature one-loop effective potential with daisy resummation and Landau gauge is adequate for strong FOPT, with renormalization scale Q = M_phi3.
    Used in Eqs. (5.1)-(5.6) and Appendix B; standard, though less controlled for couplings lambda_h as large as about 7.
  • domain assumption Bubble walls run away, v_w approximately 1.
    Stated in Section 5.2: 'we assume the runaway bubble, that is, vw about 1 for simplicity.' This affects the GW amplitude and is an idealized choice.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar field-dependent mass matrix is diagonal; the cross-quartics lambda_h12, lambda_h13, lambda_h23 from Eq. (2.2) are effectively zero in the FOPT calculation.
    Appendix B, Eqs. (B.8)-(B.10), list only diagonal M^2_phi_i and no lambda_hij contributions, but the text never states that these couplings are set to zero.
  • domain assumption Only a normal hierarchy of neutrino masses and the 3-sigma oscillation ranges are considered.
    Table 2 lists normal-hierarchy oscillation parameters; inverted hierarchy is not scanned.
  • ad hoc to paper Perturbativity of the Higgs quartic corrected by the singlet sector is approximated by Delta lambda_h < 1, giving lambda_h1 less than about 7.
    Section 5.2 explicitly labels this an approximate boundary depending on other model parameters.
invented entities (3)
  • Z2-odd singlet Majorana fermion chi no independent evidence
    purpose: Mixes with the neutral doublet component to form Majorana dark matter and closes the one-loop neutrino mass diagram.
    Its existence is assumed and its parameters are fitted to relic and neutrino data; no direct detection or collider observation is reported.
  • Z2-odd vector-like doublet fermion Psi no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates neutrino mass, contributes to (g-2)_mu and cLFV, and provides co-annihilation and charged-fermion collider signatures.
    The predicted psi+/- decay lengths in Fig. 10 lie below the CMS displaced-vertex sensitivity band, so there is no positive external evidence.
  • Three Z2-odd singlet scalars phi_1,2,3 no independent evidence
    purpose: Run in the neutrino mass loop, enable the first-order phase transition through lambda_h i quartic couplings, and open DM co-annihilation channels.
    Masses and quartics are scanned parameters; no independent signal is identified, and the FOPT interpretation is the claim under test.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21008 in / 20325 out tokens · 208803 ms · 2026-08-03T20:30:41.422626+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate an one loop radiative neutrino mass model, where the loop particles, notably a singlet fermion ($\chi$), a doublet fermion ($\Psi$) and three generations of singlet scalars ($\phi_i, i=\{1,2,3\}$) are assumed to be odd under an additional $\mathcal{Z}_2$-symmetry. In this setup, the singlet fermion mixes with the neutral component of the doublet to give rise singlet-doublet Majorana dark matter. The addition of $\mathcal{Z}_2$ odd scalars in the model provides rich phenomenological implications. We find that the quartic interaction terms between the SM Higgs and $\phi_i$s play a significant role in modifying the scalar potential to have a first-order phase transition (FOPT) leading to observable gravitational waves (GWs) spectra. We also examine the non-trivial role played by the singlet-doublet fermion DM and the scalars in loop-induced neutrino mass, $(g-2)_\mu$, and lepton flavor violation. We find that the model is predictive due to the combined constraints and can be verified at different terrestrial experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Radiative Lifting of $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Domain-Wall Degeneracy in a Type-III Seesaw Model: Implications for Leptogenesis and Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A Z3-symmetric Type-III seesaw model uses radiative Coleman-Weinberg effects to lift vacuum degeneracy and annihilate domain walls, fitting neutrino data, generating baryon asymmetry via leptogenesis at 10^9 GeV tripl...

  2. Cosmological Probes of Lepton Parity Freeze-in Dark Matter: $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ & Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lepton parity stabilizes a Majorana fermion as freeze-in dark matter produced via right-handed neutrino or Higgs decays, yielding detectable gravitational waves or ΔN_eff depending on scalar couplings.

  3. Probing Fermion-Portal Scalar Dark Matter through Charged Vector-Like Fermions at Future Muon Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Yukawa-driven t/u-channel and co-annihilation processes allow fermion-portal scalar dark matter to match the relic density while remaining consistent with direct detection, and muon colliders can probe the lightest ch...

  4. Singlet-doublet dark matter induced radiative neutrino mass and TeV scale leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Singlet-doublet dark matter induces radiative neutrino masses at one loop while enabling TeV-scale leptogenesis in both Majorana and Dirac realizations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 64 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [6]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421

    1977

  2. [7]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,Conf. Proc. C790927(1979) 315 [1306.4669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  3. [8]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 912

    1980

  4. [9]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 2227

    1980

  5. [10]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 165

    1981

  6. [11]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model,Nucl. Phys. B181(1981) 287

    1981

  7. [12]

    Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation,Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation,Nucl. Phys. B187(1981) 343

    1981

  8. [13]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number, Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 774

    1982

  9. [14]

    Ma and U

    E. Ma and U. Sarkar,Neutrino masses and leptogenesis with heavy Higgs triplets,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5716 [hep-ph/9802445]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [15]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi,Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,Z. Phys. C44(1989) 441

    1989

  11. [16]

    Zee,A Theory of Lepton Number Violation, Neutrino Majorana Mass, and Oscillation, Phys

    A. Zee,A Theory of Lepton Number Violation, Neutrino Majorana Mass, and Oscillation, Phys. Lett. B93(1980) 389

    1980

  12. [17]

    Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys

    E. Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [18]

    Fraser, E

    S. Fraser, E. Ma and O. Popov,Scotogenic Inverse Seesaw Model of Neutrino Mass,Phys. Lett. B737(2014) 280 [1408.4785]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [19]

    Konar, A

    P. Konar, A. Mukherjee, A.K. Saha and S. Show,Linking pseudo-Dirac dark matter to radiative neutrino masses in a singlet-doublet scenario,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 015024 [2001.11325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [20]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu,Singlet-doublet fermion origin of dark matter, neutrino mass and W-mass anomaly,Phys. Lett. B831(2022) 137196 [2204.09671]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [21]

    Cynolter, J

    G. Cynolter, J. Kovács and E. Lendvai,Doublet–singlet model and unitarity,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31(2016) 1650013 [1509.05323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [22]

    Bhattacharya, N

    S. Bhattacharya, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Minimal vectorlike leptonic dark matter and signatures at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 115040 [1510.02760]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [23]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Mini Review on Vector-Like Leptonic Dark Matter, Neutrino Mass, and Collider Signatures,Front. in Phys.7(2019) 80 [1812.06505]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [24]

    Bhattacharya, N

    S. Bhattacharya, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Singlet-Doublet Fermionic Dark Matter, Neutrino Mass and Collider Signatures,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035010 [1704.03417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [25]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh and N. Sahu,Multipartite Dark Matter with Scalars, Fermions and signatures at LHC,JHEP02(2019) 059 [1809.07474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [26]

    Bhattacharya, B

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Karmakar, N. Sahu and A. Sil,Flavor origin of dark matter and its relation with leptonic nonzeroθ13 and Dirac CP phaseδ,JHEP05(2017) 068 [1611.07419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [27]

    Dutta, S

    M. Dutta, S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh and N. Sahu,Singlet-Doublet Majorana Dark Matter and Neutrino Mass in a minimal Type-I Seesaw Scenario,JCAP03(2021) 008 [2009.00885]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [28]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu,Lepton anomalous magnetic moment with singlet-doublet fermion dark matter in a scotogenic U(1)Lµ-Lτmodel,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 015029 [2109.02699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [29]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu,Singlet-doublet self-interacting dark matter and radiative neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 075019 [2112.06847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [30]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, D. Nanda, S.K. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Singlet-doublet fermion Dark Matter with Dirac neutrino mass, (g−2)µ and∆N ef f,JHEP05(2024) 096 [2310.03721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [31]

    P.K. Paul, N. Sahu and P. Shukla,Thermal leptogenesis, dark matter, and gravitational waves from an extended canonical seesaw scenario,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015032 [2409.08828]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [32]

    Mahbubani and L

    R. Mahbubani and L. Senatore,The Minimal model for dark matter and unification,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 043510 [hep-ph/0510064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [33]

    D’Eramo,Dark matter and Higgs boson physics,Phys

    F. D’Eramo,Dark matter and Higgs boson physics,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 083522 [0705.4493]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [34]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Kearney, A. Pierce and D. Tucker-Smith,Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 075003 [1109.2604]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [35]

    Freitas, S

    A. Freitas, S. Westhoff and J. Zupan,Integrating in the Higgs Portal to Fermion Dark Matter, JHEP09(2015) 015 [1506.04149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [36]

    Calibbi, A

    L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti and P. Tziveloglou,Singlet-Doublet Model: Dark matter searches and LHC constraints,JHEP10(2015) 116 [1505.03867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [37]

    Cheung and D

    C. Cheung and D. Sanford,Simplified Models of Mixed Dark Matter,JCAP02(2014) 011 [1311.5896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [38]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Matsumoto, K. Mukaida and Y.-L.S. Tsai,WIMP Dark Matter in a Well-Tempered Regime: A case study on Singlet-Doublets Fermionic WIMP,JHEP11(2016) 070 [1603.07387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [39]

    Dutta Banik, A.K

    A. Dutta Banik, A.K. Saha and A. Sil,Scalar assisted singlet doublet fermion dark matter model and electroweak vacuum stability,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 075013 [1806.08080]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [40]

    Horiuchi, O

    S. Horiuchi, O. Macias, D. Restrepo, A. Rivera, O. Zapata and H. Silverwood,The Fermi-LAT gamma-ray excess at the Galactic Center in the singlet-doublet fermion dark matter model,JCAP03(2016) 048 [1602.04788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [41]

    Restrepo, A

    D. Restrepo, A. Rivera, M. Sánchez-Peláez, O. Zapata and W. Tangarife,Radiative Neutrino Masses in the Singlet-Doublet Fermion Dark Matter Model with Scalar Singlets,Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 013005 [1504.07892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [42]

    Abe,Effect of CP violation in the singlet-doublet dark matter model,Phys

    T. Abe,Effect of CP violation in the singlet-doublet dark matter model,Phys. Lett. B771 (2017) 125 [1702.07236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [43]

    Konar, A

    P. Konar, A. Mukherjee, A.K. Saha and S. Show,A dark clue to seesaw and leptogenesis in a pseudo-Dirac singlet doublet scenario with (non)standard cosmology,JHEP03(2021) 044 [2007.15608]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [44]

    Calibbi, L

    L. Calibbi, L. Lopez-Honorez, S. Lowette and A. Mariotti,Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter Freeze-in: LHC displaced signatures versus cosmology,JHEP09(2018) 037 [1805.04423]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [45]

    Ghosh, P

    P. Ghosh, P. Konar, A.K. Saha and S. Show,Self-interacting freeze-in dark matter in a singlet doublet scenario,JCAP10(2022) 017 [2112.09057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [46]

    P.K. Das, P. Konar, S. Kundu and S. Show,Jet substructure probe to unfold singlet-doublet dark matter in the presence of non-standard cosmology,JHEP06(2023) 198 [2301.02514]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [47]

    Bhattacharya, S

    S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi and J. Wudka,Probing heavy charged fermions at e+e− collider using the optimal observable technique,JHEP05(2022) 009 [2106.02846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [48]

    Enberg, P.J

    R. Enberg, P.J. Fox, L.J. Hall, A.Y. Papaioannou and M. Papucci,LHC and dark matter signals of improved naturalness,JHEP11(2007) 014 [0706.0918]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [49]

    Paul, S.K

    P.K. Paul, S.K. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Anatomy of singlet-doublet dark matter relic: annihilation, co-annihilation, co-scattering, and freeze-in,JCAP10(2025) 053 [2412.02607]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [50]

    Paul, S.K

    P.K. Paul, S.K. Sahoo and N. Sahu,Impact of conversion-driven processes on singlet-doublet Majorana dark matter relic,2511.14571

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [51]

    Curtin, P

    D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu,Testing Electroweak Baryogenesis with Future Colliders, JHEP11(2014) 127 [1409.0005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [52]

    Yunes and E

    N. Yunes and E. Berti,Accuracy of the post-Newtonian approximation: Optimal asymptotic expansion for quasicircular, extreme-mass ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124006 [0803.1853]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [53]

    Adelberger, N.A

    E.G. Adelberger, N.A. Collins and C.D. Hoyle,Analytic expressions for gravitational inner multipole moments of elementary solids and for the force between two rectangular solids, Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 125 [gr-qc/0512055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [54]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper

    A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper. Astron.51 (2021) 1333 [1908.11391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [55]

    Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1566

    1979

  51. [56]

    Casas and A

    J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra,Oscillating neutrinos andµ→e, γ,Nucl. Phys. B618(2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  52. [57]

    de Salas, D.V

    P.F. de Salas, D.V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Martínez-Miravé, O. Mena, C.A. Ternes et al.,2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,JHEP02(2021) 071 [2006.11237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [58]

    Lindner, M

    M. Lindner, M. Platscher and F.S. Queiroz,A Call for New Physics : The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavor Violation,Phys. Rept.731(2018) 1 [1610.06587]. [59]Muon g-2collaboration,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 101802 [2506.03069]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [60]

    Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys

    R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys. Rept.1143(2025) 1 [2505.21476]. [61]MEG IIcollaboration,A search forµ + →e +γwith the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 216 [2310.12614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [62]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145

    1991

  56. [63]

    Alguero, G

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, S. Kraml and A. Pukhov,Co-scattering in micrOMEGAs: A case study for the singlet-triplet dark matter model,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 124 [2207.10536]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [64]

    Alguero, G

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml et al., micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,Comput. Phys. Commun.299(2024) 109133 [2312.14894]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [65]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  59. [66]

    Alarcon, L.S

    J.M. Alarcon, L.S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and J.A. Oller,The strangeness content of the nucleon from effective field theory and phenomenology,Phys. Lett. B730(2014) 342 [1209.2870]. [67]XENONcollaboration,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 041003 [2303.14729]. [68]LZcollaboration,First Dar...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [70]

    Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,1907.06482

    J. Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,1907.06482. [71]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  61. [72]

    Crowder and N.J

    J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish,Beyond lisa: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Physical Review D72(2005)

    2005

  62. [73]

    Harry, P

    G.M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D.A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E.S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Classical and Quantum Gravity23(2006) 4887

    2006

  63. [74]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Physical Review D83(2011)

    2011

  64. [75]

    Kawamura, T

    S. Kawamura, T. Nakamura, M. Ando, N. Seto, K. Tsubono, K. Numata et al.,The japanese space gravitational wave antenna—decigo,Classical and Quantum Gravity23(2006) S125. [76]AEDGEcollaboration,AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space,EPJ Quant. Technol.7(2020) 6 [1908.00802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [77]

    Coleman and E

    S. Coleman and E. Weinberg,Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888

    1973

  66. [78]

    Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999 [hep-ph/9901312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [79]

    Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys

    R. Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1686

    1974

  68. [80]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry behavior at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

    1974

  69. [81]

    Arnold and O

    P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  70. [82]

    Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys

    R.R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  71. [83]

    Hindmarsh, M

    M.B. Hindmarsh, M. Lüben, J. Lumma and M. Pauly,Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24(2021) 1 [2008.09136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [84]

    Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,Comput

    C.L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 2006 [1109.4189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [85]

    Eichhorn, J

    A. Eichhorn, J. Lumma, J.M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert and M. Yamada,Universal gravitational-wave signatures from heavy new physics in the electroweak sector,JCAP05 (2021) 006 [2010.00017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [86]

    Caprini and D.G

    C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa,Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 163001 [1801.04268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [87]

    Mirzaie, K

    S. Mirzaie, K. Ghorbani and P. Ghorbani,Fermion dark matter effect on electroweak phase transition,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1187 [2502.04265]

    arXiv 2025

  76. [88]

    Braconi, M.-C

    A. Braconi, M.-C. Chen, G. Gaswint and G. Gaswint,Revisiting electroweak phase transition with varying Yukawa coupling constants,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 015032 [1810.02522]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [89]

    Phong, N.T

    V.Q. Phong, N.T. Tuong, N.C. Thao and H.N. Long,Multiperiod structure of electroweak phase transition in the 3-3-1-1 model,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 015035

    2019

  78. [90]

    Oikonomou and A

    V.K. Oikonomou and A. Giovanakis,Electroweak phase transition in singlet extensions of the standard model with dimension-six operators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055044 [2403.01591]. [91]CMScollaboration,Search for long-lived particles using displaced vertices and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 112005 ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [92]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [93]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4514

    1992

Showing first 80 references.