Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 85 references

Dichography: Two-frame Ultrafast Imaging from a Single Diffraction Pattern

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dichography retrieves two time-delayed images of a sample from a single diffraction pattern in which their X-ray scattering signals overlap.

desk verdict A genuinely new algorithmic separation of mixed diffraction patterns, well validated on double-hits; the two-color nanodroplet survival claim is plausible but underdetermined by the shared-sphere constraint and sparse data. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20153 v3 pith:RZ643YPH submitted 2025-08-27 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.data-an

Linos Hecht , Andre Al Haddad , Björn Bastian , Thomas M. Baumann , Johan Bielecki , Christoph Bostedt , Subhendu De , Alberto De Fanis
show 42 more authors
Simon Dold Thomas Fennel Fanny Goy Christina Graf Robert Hartmann Georg Jakobs Maximilian Joschko Gregor Knopp Katharina Kolatzki Sivarama Krishnan Björn Kruse Asbj{o}rn {O}. L{ae}gdsmand Bruno Langbehn Suddhasattwa Mandal Tommaso Mazza Michael Meyer Christian Peltz Thomas Pfeifer Safi Rafie-Zinedine Antoine Sarracini Mario Sauppe Florian Schenk Kirsten Schnorr Björn Senfftleben Keshav Sishodia Frank Stienkemeier Zhibin Sun Rico Mayro P. Tanyag Paul Tümmler Sergey Usenko Carl Frederic Ussling Vanessa Wood Xinhua Xie Maksym Yarema Olesya Yarema Nuri Yazdani Hankai Zhang Bernd von Issendorff Yevheniy Ovcharenko Marcel Mudrich Daniela Rupp Alessandro Colombo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallphysics.data-an
keywords Dichographycoherentdiffractionimagingphaseretrievaltwo-colorX-rayfree-electronlaserultrafastheliumnanodropletssingle-particletime-resolvednanoscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dichography is a diffraction-imaging method that separates the superimposed, non-interfering scattering signals of two X-ray pulses that hit a sample at different times and are recorded together on one detector. The paper claims that both underlying sample images can be retrieved independently from this single mixed pattern, and demonstrates the claim on two kinds of data: pairs of silver nanoparticles struck by the same pulse, and xenon-doped superfluid helium nanodroplets illuminated by two-color X-ray pulses 750 fs apart. From favorable nanodroplet patterns it reconstructs two frames at about 20 nm resolution whose matching xenon structures are read as evidence that the dopant survives the first pulse at least that long. If Dichography works as claimed, existing two-color X-ray free-electron lasers can produce two-frame ultrafast movies of nanomatter without any detector upgrade, since the bottleneck was never the light pulses but the inability to read the two diffraction patterns out separately.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dichographic intensity projector. At each detector pixel the two current field estimates provide amplitudes M_A, M_B and phases phi_A, phi_B; the amplitude pair is treated as a two-dimensional vector and renormalized so that its length equals the square root of the measured intensity while its direction—the relative-amplitude phase phi_M—is preserved. This one operation couples two otherwise independent iterative phase-retrieval loops, so conventional HIO/ER-type algorithms can be adapted almost directly. For the nanodroplet data, a Droplet-CDI constraint fixes both frames to the same pre-fitted spherical helium envelope, leaving only the inner xenon density

What would settle it

On simulated two-color data where the helium envelope expands or distorts by 750 fs while the xenon doping is identical, run Dichography with the fixed spherical-envelope constraint: if the reconstructions still show two spherical envelopes with matching xenon features, the constraint alone can manufacture the paper's main evidence. Experimentally, the same two-color nanodroplet patterns could be reconstructed with and without the shared-sphere constraint; if the matching xenon structures only appear when the shared envelope is forced, the survival claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that when the recorded intensity obeys I(q) = |psi_A(q)|^2 + |psi_B(q)|^2—two independent scattered fields whose intensities add without an interference cross-term—both fields, and therefore both sample densities rho_A and rho_B, can be retrieved from the single mixed diffraction pattern. The retrieval runs two otherwise separate phase-retrieval reconstructions that are coupled only when the data are enforced: at each pixel the two field amplitudes are rescaled together so that the sum of their squared magnitudes matches the measurement, while all phases are kept. Applied to two-color X-ray data from xenon-doped helium nanodroplets, the reconstructions show a 1.0 keV fra

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the recorded pattern is exactly the incoherent sum of two independent scattered fields; for the nanodroplet result it is also assumed that both frames share the same pre-fitted spherical helium envelope, so a droplet that deformed within 750 fs would still be reconstructed as spherical and could produce apparent agreement between the frames.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two-frame structural movies of isolated nanoparticles at terahertz-scale time separations become possible from a single detector exposure using existing two-color X-ray pulse modes.
  • Any experiment whose detector signal is an incoherent sum—two particles in the focus, overlapping broadband or polychromatic scattering, or two exposures on one frame—becomes a candidate for the same algorithmic separation.
  • The nanodroplet results imply that within 20 nm, the xenon dopant distribution is unchanged 750 fs after the first pulse, so the early damage from the pump pulse does not yet rearrange the heavy-atom skeleton.
  • A moderate increase in two-color pulse brightness or the addition of per-photon energy information should move Dichography from a few optimal patterns to routine reconstructions.
  • Combined with an optical-laser prepulse or attosecond two-color pulses, Dichography would allow direct imaging of shock-wave expansion, disintegration, and electronic-excitation dynamics in nanomatter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test the paper does not perform: run Dichography on simulated two-color data in which the helium envelope is allowed to expand or distort between the two frames. Because the shared-sphere DCDI constraint would force both frames to be spherical anyway, this would reveal whether apparent frame consistency can be manufactured by the prior.
  • The different pixel scales of the two frames (5.57 nm versus 4.64 nm per pixel) give a built-in ghost detector: a genuine physical feature must occupy different pixel counts in the two reconstructions, while a ghost appears at the wrong scale. This could be formalized as a quantitative consistency score.
  • The paper's uniqueness observation—knowing one frame correctly reduces the other to ordinary CDI—suggests a path to a full proof that the dichographic problem has no spurious solutions, which would put the method on the same footing as conventional phase retrieval.
  • The vector-rescaling projector generalizes naturally to N incoherently summed fields by renormalizing an N-dimensional amplitude vector at each pixel, so the same machinery may extend to three-frame or spectrally multiplexed imaging.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Dichography, an algorithmic extension of single-particle CDI that separates a single recorded diffraction pattern I(q) into two incoherent intensity contributions |ψ_A|^2 + |ψ_B|^2 (Eq. 1) and reconstructs the two corresponding densities ρ_A and ρ_B. The method is demonstrated on two experimental datasets: (i) two-color XFEL data from Xe-doped superfluid He nanodroplets at the European XFEL (1.0 keV and 1.2 keV pulses separated by 750 fs), where the spherical He envelope is imposed via DCDI and only the Xe doping is retrieved; and (ii) SwissFEL double-hit data in which two Ag nanocubes/nanoparticles are illuminated by the same pulse. Successful Ag reconstructions show separated four-fold-symmetric diffraction patterns with ghosting roughly two orders of magnitude below the true signal. The two-color reconstructions show similar Xe features in both frames, which the authors interpret as evidence that no significant structural damage occurs within 750 fs. Appendices describe the iterative projector (Appendix A), oversampling and uniqueness (Appendix B), the Memetic Phase Retrieval adaptation 'Equinox' (Appendix C), experimental details (Appendix D), and DCDI implementation (Appendix E).

Significance. If the central claims hold, Dichography offers a genuinely new capability: two time-delayed structural snapshots from a single detector readout, avoiding spectral filtering or beam splitting. The paper has concrete strengths: the double-hit results are visually compelling and are supported by an open-source implementation (Equinox) and public data; the disentangled nanocube patterns show the expected four-fold symmetry; and the paper is candid about the missing uniqueness proof and about the role of DCDI. The significance of the ultrafast-movie claim, however, rests on the two-color nanodroplet reconstructions, which are fewer in number and depend on a pre-imposed spherical helium envelope. Because that dependency is not stress-tested in the main text, the physical conclusion should be treated as promising but not fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B and Appendix E] The survival inference at 750 fs is partly circular with respect to the DCDI constraint. Both frames are reconstructed inside the same pre-fitted spherical helium envelope; the algorithm cannot represent deformation, expansion, or mass loss, so it would output spherical-envelope frames even if the droplet had changed. The cited support is a companion paper (Ref. [35]) and an ion-displacement estimate of ≤18.6 nm, which is below but close to the 19–20 nm resolution and accounts only for ionic Coulomb motion. A null control is needed: run the same pipeline on simulated two-color data with a deliberately deformed droplet (or wrong fixed radius) and show that retrieved Xe features do not artificially reproduce the pump-frame structure. Without this, the abstract's 'provides evidence' claim goes beyond what the reconstruction alone establishes.
  2. [Sec. III.A vs. III.B, Figs. 2–4] The double-hit validation does not transfer quantitatively to the two-color regime. Double-hits have disjoint supports (>4 µm separation), same wavelength, high photon counts, and no shared envelope; two-color data have overlapping supports, 1–10 photons/pixel (Fig. 4 color bars), unbalanced brightness (64% and 3×), and enforced spherical envelopes. The Fig. 2 ghosting estimate (≈10^-2) therefore does not calibrate the low-count, overlapping-support geometry of Fig. 4. The main text should include a two-color ghosting benchmark with the DCDI constraint, beyond the reference to Supplemental Sec. S1.
  3. [Appendix B1, Eq. (B4)] Appendix B1 explicitly states that uniqueness is unproven. Eq. (B4) is conditional: if one frame is already correct, the other is unique; it does not establish uniqueness of the pair from I(q) in Eq. (1). The inherent ambiguity I = J + (I−J) means the method's success in the two-color regime is an empirical claim. The authors should provide a formal uniqueness/stability result or a quantitative ground-truth test using the actual DCDI constraint and noise level.
  4. [Sec. III.B, Fig. 7 and Appendix E] The pixel-scaling argument excluding ghosting is suggestive but not quantitative. Different pixel sizes (5.57 nm vs 4.64 nm, Eq. (E1)) make a true structure span different pixel counts, but a ghost generated in the target frame could be rescaled by the target frame's constraints. A numerical test is needed: inject a strong feature in one frame's Fourier data and check whether it leaks into the other at the wrong scale.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: 'snapshtos' should be 'snapshots'.
  2. [Sec. III.B] The phrase 'controllable time delays delay' contains a duplicated word; 'delay' appears twice.
  3. [Sec. III.A] The sentence 'The number of photons scattered by the first frame in Fig. 2c' is confusing: Fig. 2c is a density map, not a scattering frame. The intended reference appears to be Fig. 3c or a disentangled pattern.
  4. [Appendix B] The oversampling count O_d' > 4 (Eq. B2) treats the two supports' areas independently, but in the two-color case the two frames share the same compact support region; the practical oversampling is smaller than in the double-hit case, and the text should state this explicitly.
  5. [References] The Supplemental Material placeholder 'URL_will_be_provided_by_the_publisher' should be resolved; the companion paper Ref. [35] should be explicitly identified as a companion preprint.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Nanodroplet survival claim rests on a self-cited fitting assumption (D constant over 750 fs); the Dichography method itself is independently validated by double-hit nanocube benchmarks.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section III B and Appendix E (DCDI prerequisites; Ref. [35])]
    "The applicability of the DCDI method to the two-color pump-probe data relies on two fundamental prerequisites: the ability to determine the droplet size a priori, and the structural integrity of the droplet, which must be preserved over the 750 fs time delay between the two XFEL pulses. Both of these conditions have been verified and demonstrated in Ref. [35]... In this procedure, the droplet size D is assumed constant between the two scattering events."

    The load-bearing premise for the two-color nanodroplet reconstruction is that the helium droplet remains a hard sphere of constant size over the 750 fs delay. The paper cites the same-author companion paper (Ref. [35]) as having verified this premise, but that verification consists of fitting the two-color radial profile as the incoherent sum of two Mie intensities while assuming D is constant between the two pulses. A fit made under the constancy assumption cannot independently establish constancy; it can only report compatibility. The present paper then imposes that fitted spherical envelope as a fixed DCDI constraint on both frames, so the late frame is forced to share the same spherical support. Consequently the 'no structural damage' inference for the nanodroplet branch is conditional

full rationale

The core Dichography method is not circular: the split of I into |psi_A|^2 + |psi_B|^2 is enforced by the iterative intensity projector (Eq. A1) and is independently benchmarked on experimental double-hit data against known silver nanocube morphologies and on simulated data. The two-color xenon-doped droplet branch, however, imports a load-bearing premise from Ref. [35], a companion paper with overlapping authors: droplet integrity over 750 fs. That companion paper's fit assumes a single constant droplet size D between the two pulses, so treating it as an independent verification of droplet integrity is a mild circular step. The paper itself also concedes that Dichography uniqueness is unproven (Appendix B 1), which is a limitation rather than a circularity. Overall, the central imaging claim retains independent content, but the nanodroplet survival claim is partially anchored in a self-cited fitting assumption, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities: Dichography and Equinox are algorithmic/software constructs without independent falsifiable handles. The demonstration borrows fitted or selected quantities (droplet radius, per-pulse brightness balance, SNR cutoff) and rests on assumptions whose validity is only partially established (mutual incoherence; support/oversampling; uniqueness; pristine droplet at 750 fs). The heaviest load is carried by the DCDI premise and the open uniqueness question.

free parameters (3)
  • Helium droplet radius R (used value 350 nm) = R = 350 nm (diameter ~700 nm)
    Fitted to the radial diffraction profile as a Mie-scattering hard sphere in the companion paper (Ref. [35]) and used a priori to constrain both frames via DCDI (Appendix E).
  • Relative two-pulse brightness (1.0 keV vs 1.2 keV) = 1.2 keV frame 64% brighter than 1.0 keV (Fig. 4a); ~3x brighter (Fig. 4d)
    Extracted from the Mie fit and from the reconstructed frames; the algorithm's convergence is reported to depend on this brightness balance.
  • Signal-to-noise cutoff for resolution = theta_max ~ 1.5 deg, giving ~19-20 nm
    The maximum scattering angle at which the signal is above noise is chosen empirically (Ref. [35]); it sets the claimed 20 nm resolution and the weakest detectable structural change.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Far-field kinematic scattering: the scattered field is the Fourier transform of the sample density, rho proportional to F^{-1}[psi]
    Invoked in Sec. II and Appendix A1 to justify phase retrieval as the inversion problem; standard CDI assumption cited to Ref. [7].
  • domain assumption Mutual incoherence of the two scattered fields, so that I = |psi_A|^2 + |psi_B|^2 without a cross term (Eq. 1)
    For two-color pulses the wavelength difference averages the interference term over the detector integration time; for double-hits it requires the particle separation to exceed the detector's ability to resolve fringes (Appendix D1, ~4 micrometers).
  • domain assumption Support constraint and sufficient oversampling: each frame is compact with zero scattering outside, and O'_d > 4 is sufficient (Eqs. B1-B3)
    Appendix B derives the O'_d > 4 counting condition and uses it algorithmically; the counting argument is heuristic and the authors note the stricter oversampling requirement versus conventional CDI.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniqueness of the dichographic solution (the iterative algorithm converges to the true pair of frames)
    Appendix B1: 'the existence of a unique solution for Dichography remains an open question'; the paper relies on simulations and practical evidence instead of a proof.
  • domain assumption The helium droplet is a pristine hard sphere of the Mie-fitted size for both pulses, valid as a DCDI constraint at 750 fs delay
    Sec. III.B and Appendix E: applicability relies on droplet size extraction and persistence of the droplet density, verified in the overlapping-author companion paper Ref. [35] and via a charging model.
  • domain assumption Charging-model bound: maximum ion displacement in 750 fs is 18.6 nm, below the ~19 nm resolution
    Appendix E uses the formula n_e,out = (h nu - I_p) 4 pi epsilon_0 R e^{-2} from Ref. [78] and an estimate deferred to the unavailable Sec. S5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dichography: Two-frame Ultrafast Imaging from a Single Diffraction Pattern." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZ643YPH

@misc{pith2026250820153,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dichography: Two-frame Ultrafast Imaging from a Single Diffraction Pattern},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZ643YPH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20153}
}
read the original abstract

We experimentally demonstrate that pairs of time-delayed ultrabright and ultrashort X-ray pulses of two different colors, delivered by modern X-ray Free Electron Lasers, can provide two time-delayed snapshots of a sample. We introduce Dichography, a method that algorithmically separates the diffraction signals overlapping on the detector and independently retrieves the two images of the specimen. We employ Dichography to reconstruct two views of individual xenon-doped helium nanodroplets with 20 nm spatial resolution. The consistency of structures observed in both images at delays up to 750 fs provides evidence that, under these illumination conditions, significant structural damage only occurs at longer timescales. We further validate the method by imaging pairs of silver nanoparticles intercepted by the same light pulse. Dichography enables a new class of experiments across physics, chemistry, and materials science, making a significant step toward the original promise of X-ray free-electron lasers to capture ultrafast movies of nanomatter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20153 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Intuitive representation of the difference between con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Example of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. d, and presents many peculiarities of the samples shown before in one. The two frames of the reconstruc￾tion have a significantly different spatial extension, 80 nm for the smaller and up to a maximum of 200 nm for the larger. The smaller density has a simple cubic archi￾tecture, whereas the larger one can be interpreted as an agglomerate of four nanocubes. The shape of three cubes in the agglomerate is well imprint… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Reconstructions from two-color diffraction patterns acquired at the European XFEL, produced by superfluid helium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: For a given pixel coordinate i, j, the values of the scattered fields ψ A ij and ψ B ij can be represented in the complex plane, as in Fig. 6a, in polar coordinates. The two moduli, MA and MB, can then be considered as the two components of a two-dimensional vector, as…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Scheme of the iterative phase retrieval algorithm for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Graphical representation of the action of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Reconstruction of a xenon-doped helium nanodroplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    K. R. Ferguson, M. Bucher, T. Gorkhover, S. Boutet, H. Fukuzawa, J. E. Koglin, Y. Kumagai, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, M. Messerschmidt, K. Nagaya, J. Turner, K. Ueda, G. J. Williams, P. H. Bucksbaum, and C. Bost- edt, Transient lattice contraction in the solid-to-plasma transition, Science Advances 2, e1500837 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    Iterative phase retrieval Coherent Diffraction Imaging (CDI) is an indirect imaging method that requires extensive numerical anal- ysis to obtain the sample image from the recorded data. The scattered field ψ encodes the complete information about the spatial density of the sample, ρ, as they are mathematically linked by a Fourier Transform (FT) op- erati...

  3. [2]

    Constraining experimental data In Dichography, the experimentally acquired informa- tion on the sum of the two scattering signals has to be constrained, i.e., propagated to the two frames of the re- construction, to make the two estimates of the field, ψA and ψB, satisfy the condition in Eq. (A1). An intuitive description of the operation is reported in F...

  4. [3]

    equations

    Real-space constraint The application of the real-space constraint, i.e., the support function, is performed independently on the two frames, as if they were two separate reconstruction proce- dures using iterative algorithms for conventional single- particle CDI. This means that each of the two densities, ρA and ρB, is constrained to its own independent ...

  5. [4]

    They are designed to minimize the difference between the mea- sured experimental data and the Fourier intensities of the reconstructed sample image

    Uniqueness of the solution All imaging algorithms for conventional CDI are, in practice, optimization algorithms [7, 32, 40]. They are designed to minimize the difference between the mea- sured experimental data and the Fourier intensities of the reconstructed sample image. Thus, the phase re- trieval problem is an optimization problem. The recon- structi...

  6. [5]

    Silver nanoparticles at SwissFEL The two-color experiment was performed at the Mal- oja endstation of SwissFEL [68, 69]. Wet-chemically grown silver nanoparticles were injected into the exper- imental chamber, kept under vacuum conditions, using an electrospray and a set of aerodynamic lenses [70, 71]. The electrospray disperses the liquid containing the ...

  7. [6]

    The XFEL was operated at a repetition rate of 10 Hz with an elec- tron energy of 16 GeV

    Two-color experiment at the European XFEL The experiment was performed at the Nano-sized Quantum Systems (NQS) endstation of the Small Quan- tum Systems (SQS) instrument [73–75], located on the SASE3 branch of the European XFEL [76]. The XFEL was operated at a repetition rate of 10 Hz with an elec- tron energy of 16 GeV. Two consecutive sets of XFEL undul...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Z. Guo, T. Driver, S. Beauvarlet, D. Cesar, J. Duris, P. L. Franz, O. Alexander, D. Bohler, C. Bostedt, V. Aver- bukh, et al. , Experimental demonstration of attosecond pump–probe spectroscopy with an x-ray free-electron laser, Nature Photonics 18, 691 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 85 references
  1. [8]

    Franz, S

    P. Franz, S. Li, T. Driver, R. R. Robles, D. Cesar, E. Isele, Z. Guo, J. Wang, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, et al., Terawatt- scale attosecond x-ray pulses from a cascaded superradi- ant free-electron laser, Nature Photonics 18, 698 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, et al. , Terawatt-attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser at high repetition rate, Nature Photonics 18, 1293 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    P. K. Maroju, C. Grazioli, M. Di Fraia, M. Moioli, D. Er- tel, H. Ahmadi, O. Plekan, P. Finetti, E. Allaria, L. Gi- annessi, et al. , Complex attosecond waveform synthesis at fel fermi, Applied Sciences 11, 9791 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee, et al., Tunable isolated attosec- ond x-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free- electron laser, Nature Photonics 14, 30 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    R. A. Kirian and H. N. Chapman, Imaging of objects by coherent diffraction of x-ray free-electron laser pulses, in Synchrotron Light Sources and Free-Electron Lasers (Springer International Publishing, 2016) pp. 1135–1195

    2016

  6. [13]

    Colombo and D

    A. Colombo and D. Rupp, Imaging clusters and their dynamics with single-shot coherent diffraction (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    H. N. Chapman, A. Barty, M. J. Bogan, S. Boutet, M. Frank, S. P. Hau-Riege, S. Marchesini, B. W. Woods, 16 S. Bajt, W. H. Benner, et al. , Femtosecond diffrac- tive imaging with a soft-x-ray free-electron laser, Nature Physics 2, 839 (2006)

    2006

  8. [15]

    Kimura, Y

    T. Kimura, Y. Joti, A. Shibuya, C. Song, S. Kim, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, M. Tamakoshi, T. Moriya, T. Os- hima, et al. , Imaging live cell in micro-liquid enclosure by x-ray laser diffraction, Nat. Commun. 5, 3052 (2014)

    2014

  9. [16]

    M. M. Seibert, T. Ekeberg, F. R. N. C. Maia, M. Svenda, J. Andreasson, O. J¨ onsson, D. Odi´ c, B. Iwan, A. Rocker, D. Westphal, M. Hantke, D. P. DePonte, A. Barty, J. Schulz, L. Gumprecht, N. Coppola, A. Aquila, M. Liang, T. A. White, A. Martin, C. Caleman, S. Stern, C. Aberg...

    2011

  10. [17]

    Ekeberg, D

    T. Ekeberg, D. Assalauova, J. Bielecki, R. Boll, B. J. Daurer, L. A. Eichacker, L. E. Franken, D. E. Galli, L. Gelisio, L. Gumprecht, et al. , Observation of a sin- gle protein by ultrafast x-ray diffraction, Light: Science & Applications 13, 15 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    Colombo, S

    A. Colombo, S. Dold, P. Kolb, N. Bernhardt, P. Behrens, J. Correa, S. D¨ usterer, B. Erk, L. Hecht, A. Heil- rath, R. Irsig, N. Iwe, J. Jordan, B. Kruse, B. Lang- behn, B. Manschwetus, F. Martinez, K.-H. Meiwes- Broer, K. Oldenburg, C. Passow, C. Peltz, M. Sauppe, F. Seel, R. ...

    2023

  12. [19]

    Langbehn, K

    B. Langbehn, K. Sander, Y. Ovcharenko, C. Peltz, A. Clark, M. Coreno, R. Cucini, M. Drabbels, P. Finetti, M. Di Fraia, L. Giannessi, C. Grazioli, D. Iablonskyi, A. C. LaForge, T. Nishiyama, V. Oliver ´Alvarez de Lara, P. Piseri, O. Plekan, K. Ueda, J. Zimmermann, K. C. Prince,...

    2018

  13. [20]

    Gorkhover, S

    T. Gorkhover, S. Schorb, R. N. Coffee, M. Adolph, L. Foucar, D. Rupp, A. Aquila, J. D. Bozek, S. W. Epp, B. Erk, L. Gumprecht, L. Holmegaard, A. Hart- mann, R. Hartmann, G. Hauser, P. Holl, A. H¨ omke, P. Johnsson, N. Kimmel, K. U. K¨ uhnel, M. Messer- schmidt, C. Reich, A. Ro...

    2016

  14. [21]

    Fl¨ uckiger, D

    L. Fl¨ uckiger, D. Rupp, M. Adolph, T. Gorkhover, M. Krikunova, M. M¨ uller, T. Oelze, Y. Ovcharenko, M. Sauppe, S. Schorb, C. Bostedt, S. D¨ usterer, M. Har- mand, H. Redlin, R. Treusch, and T. M¨ oller, Time- resolved x-ray imaging of a laser-induced nanoplasma and its neutr...

    2016

  15. [22]

    Langbehn, Y

    B. Langbehn, Y. Ovcharenko, A. Clark, M. Coreno, R. Cucini, A. Demidovich, M. Drabbels, P. Finetti, M. D. Fraia, L. Giannessi, C. Grazioli, D. Iablonskyi, A. C. LaForge, T. Nishiyama, V. O. ´A. de Lara, C. Peltz, P. Piseri, O. Plekan, K. Sander, K. Ueda, T. Fennel, K. C. Princ...

    2022

  16. [23]

    Bacellar, A

    C. Bacellar, A. S. Chatterley, F. Lackner, C. D. Pem- maraju, R. M. P. Tanyag, D. Verma, C. Bernando, S. M. O. O’Connell, M. Bucher, K. R. Ferguson, T. Gorkhover, R. N. Coffee, G. Coslovich, D. Ray, T. Os- ipov, D. M. Neumark, C. Bostedt, A. F. Vilesov, and O. Gessner, Anisotr...

    2022

  17. [24]

    S. Dold, T. Reichenbach, A. Colombo, J. Jordan, I. Barke, P. Behrens, N. Bernhardt, J. Correa, S. D¨ usterer, B. Erk, T. Fennel, L. Hecht, A. Heilrath, R. Irsig, N. Iwe, P. Kolb, B. Kruse, B. Langbehn, B. Man- schwetus, P. Marienhagen, F. Martinez, K.-H. Meiwes- Broer, K. Olde...

    2025

  18. [25]

    Serkez, W

    S. Serkez, W. Decking, L. Froehlich, N. Gerasimova, J. Gr¨ unert, M. Guetg, M. Huttula, S. Karabekyan, A. Koch, V. Kocharyan, et al. , Opportunities for two- color experiments in the soft x-ray regime at the euro- pean xfel, Applied Sciences 10, 2728 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    Lutman, R

    A. Lutman, R. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, J. Krzywin- ski, T. Maxwell, M. Messerschmidt, and H.-D. Nuhn, Ex- perimental demonstration of femtosecond two-color x-ray free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters 110, 134801 (2013)

    2013

  20. [27]

    Marinelli, D

    A. Marinelli, D. Ratner, A. Lutman, J. Turner, J. Welch, F.-J. Decker, H. Loos, C. Behrens, S. Gilevich, A. Mi- ahnahri, S. Vetter, T. Maxwell, Y. Ding, R. Coffee, S. Wakatsuki, and Z. Huang, High-intensity double- pulse X-ray free-electron laser, Nature Communications 6, 6369 (2015)

    2015

  21. [28]

    Allaria, D

    E. Allaria, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana, P. Craievich, M. Dal Forno, M. Danailov, G. D’Auria, A. Demidovich, G. De Ninno, S. Di Mitri, et al. , Two-stage seeded soft- x-ray free-electron laser, Nature Photonics 7, 913 (2013)

    2013

  22. [29]

    T. Hara, Y. Inubushi, T. Katayama, T. Sato, H. Tanaka, T. Tanaka, T. Togashi, K. Togawa, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, et al., Two-colour hard x-ray free-electron laser with wide tunability, Nature communications 4, 2919 (2013)

    2013

  23. [30]

    E. Prat, P. Dijkstal, E. Ferrari, R. Ganter, P. Jurani´ c, A. Malyzhenkov, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, G. Wang, A. A. Haddad, et al. , Widely tunable two-color x-ray free-electron laser pulses, Physical Review Research 4, 17 L022025 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    Str¨ uder, S

    L. Str¨ uder, S. Epp, D. Rolles, R. Hartmann, P. Holl, G. Lutz, H. Soltau, R. Eckart, C. Reich, K. Heinzinger, C. Thamm, A. Rudenko, F. Krasniqi, K.-U. K¨ uhnel, C. Bauer, C.-D. Schr¨ oter, R. Moshammer, S. Techert, D. Miessner, M. Porro, O. H¨ alker, N. Meidinger, N. Kim- mel...

    2010

  25. [32]

    Kuster, K

    M. Kuster, K. Ahmed, K.-E. Ballak, C. Danilevski, M. Ekmedˇ zi´ c, B. Fernandes, P. Gessler, R. Hartmann, S. Hauf, P. Holl, M. Meyer, J. Monta˜ no, A. M¨ unnich, Y. Ovcharenko, N. Rennhack, T. R¨ uter, D. Rupp, D. Schlosser, K. Setoodehnia, R. Schmitt, L. Str¨ uder, R. M. P. T...

    2021

  26. [33]

    Hinger, A

    V. Hinger, A. al Haddad, R. Barten, A. Bergamaschi, M. Br¨ uckner, M. Carulla, S. Chiriotti-Alvarez, R. Di- napoli, S. Ebner, E. Fr¨ ojdh, et al. , Advancing the jungfrau detector toward low-energy x-ray applications, Journal of Instrumentation 17 (09), C09027

  27. [34]

    Marchesini, H

    S. Marchesini, H. He, H. N. Chapman, S. P. Hau-Riege, A. Noy, M. R. Howells, U. Weierstall, and J. C. H. Spence, X-ray image reconstruction from a diffraction pattern alone, Phys. Rev. B 68, 140101(R) (2003)

    2003

  28. [36]

    Hecht, Zweifarben-Streubildaufnahme von Helium- Nanotr¨ opfchen: Planung, Durchf¨ uhrung und erste Ergeb- nisse, Master’s thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Berlin, Berlin (2018)

    L. Hecht, Zweifarben-Streubildaufnahme von Helium- Nanotr¨ opfchen: Planung, Durchf¨ uhrung und erste Ergeb- nisse, Master’s thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Berlin, Berlin (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Sauppe, T

    M. Sauppe, T. Bischoff, C. Bomme, C. Bostedt, A. Colombo, B. Erk, T. Feigl, L. Fl¨ uckiger, T. Gorkhover, A. Heilrath, K. Kolatzki, Y. Kumagai, B. Langbehn, J. P. M¨ oller, C. Passow, D. Ramm, D. Rolles, D. Rompo- tis, J. Sch¨ afer-Zimmermann, B. Senfftleben, R. Treusch, A. Ul...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Marchesini, Invited article: A unified evaluation of iterative projection algorithms for phase retrieval, Rev

    S. Marchesini, Invited article: A unified evaluation of iterative projection algorithms for phase retrieval, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 011301 (2007)

    2007

  31. [39]

    Nolting, C

    F. Nolting, C. Bostedt, T. Schietinger, and H. Braun, The swiss light source and swissfel at the paul scherrer institute, The European Physical Journal Plus 138, 126 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    See Supplemental Material at URL_will_be_provided_ by_the_publisher

  33. [41]

    Hecht, Y

    L. Hecht, Y. Ovcharenko, A. Ø. Lægdsmand, B. Bas- tian, T. M. Baumann, A. Colombo, S. De, A. D. Fanis, S. Dold, T. Fennel, R. Hartmann, K. Ko- latzki, S. Krishnan, B. Kruse, A. C. Laforge, B. Lang- behn, S. Mandal, T. Mazza, C. Medina, C. Peltz, T. Pfeifer, B. Senfftleben, K. ...

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    R. M. P. Tanyag, C. Bernando, C. F. Jones, C. Bacel- lar, K. R. Ferguson, D. Anielski, R. Boll, S. Carron, J. P. Cryan, L. Englert,et al., Communication: X-ray co- herent diffractive imaging by immersion in nanodroplets, Structural Dynamics 2 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Gessner and A

    O. Gessner and A. F. Vilesov, Imaging quantum vortices in superfluid helium droplets, Annual review of physical chemistry 70, 173 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Ulmer, A

    A. Ulmer, A. Heilrath, B. Senfftleben, S. M. O’Connell- Lopez, B. Kruse, L. Seiffert, K. Kolatzki, B. Langbehn, A. Hoffmann, T. M. Baumann, et al., Generation of large vortex-free superfluid helium nanodroplets, Physical re- view letters 131, 076002 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    R. M. P. Tanyag, C. F. Jones, C. Bernando, S. M. O. O’Connell, D. Verma, and A. F. Vilesov, CHAPTER

  38. [46]

    Dulieu and A

    Experiments with Large Superfluid Helium Nan- odroplets, in Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Series, edited by O. Dulieu and A. Osterwalder (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2017) pp. 389–443

    2017

  39. [47]

    Colombo, M

    A. Colombo, M. Sauppe, A. A. Haddad, K. Ayyer, M. Babayan, R. Boll, R. Dagar, S. Dold, T. Fen- nel, L. Hecht, G. Knopp, K. Kolatzki, B. Langbehn, F. R. N. C. Maia, A. Mall, P. Mazumder, T. Mazza, Y. Ovcharenko, I. C. Polat, D. Raiser, J. C. Sch¨ afer- Zimmermann, K. Schnorr, M...

    2025

  40. [48]

    E. Prat, Z. Geng, C. Kittel, A. Malyzhenkov, F. Mar- cellini, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and P. Craievich, At- tosecond time-resolved measurements of electron and photon beams with a variable polarization x-band ra- diofrequency deflector at an x-ray free-electron laser, Ad- v...

    2025

  41. [49]

    Kuschel, P

    S. Kuschel, P. J. Ho, A. Al Haddad, F. F. Zimmermann, L. Flueckiger, M. R. Ware, J. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, A. Lutman, M.-F. Lin, X. Li, K. Nakahara, J. W. Aldrich, P. Walter, L. Young, C. Bostedt, A. Marinelli, and T. Gorkhover, Non-linear enhancement of ultrafast X-ray diffr...

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    Ulmer, P

    A. Ulmer, P. J. Ho, B. Langbehn, S. Kuschel, L. Hecht, R. Obaid, S. Dold, T. Driver, J. Duris, M.-F. Lin, D. Cesar, P. Franz, Z. Guo, P. A. Hart, A. Kamalov, K. A. Larsen, X. Li, M. Meyer, K. Nakahara, R. G. Radloff, R. Robles, L. R¨ onnebeck, N. Sudar, A. M. Summers, L. Young...

    2025 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. C. Sch¨ afer-Zimmermann, T. von Scheven, K. Ko- latzki, B. Kruse, B. Langbehn, T. M¨ oller, N. Monserud, M. Sauppe, B. Sch¨ utte, B. Senfftleben, R. M. P. Tanyag, A. Ulmer, T. Fennel, M. J. J. Vrakking, A. Rouz´ ee, and D. Rupp, Laser-induced transient opacity in helium nan...

    2025

  44. [52]

    Vicario, S

    C. Vicario, S. Bettoni, A. Lutman, A. Dax, M. Huppert, and A. Trisorio, Two-color x-ray free-electron laser by photocathode laser emittance spoiler, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 24, 060703 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Marr and J

    G. Marr and J. West, Absolute photoionization cross- section tables for helium, neon, argon, and krypton in the vuv spectral regions, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 18, 497 (1976)

    1976

  46. [54]

    Allaria, L

    E. Allaria, L. Badano, S. Bassanese, F. Capotondi, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana, M. B. Danailov, G. D’Auria, A. Demidovich, R. De Monte, G. De Ninno, S. Di Mitri, B. Diviacco, W. M. Fawley, M. Ferianis, E. Ferrari, G. Gaio, D. Gauthier, L. Giannessi, F. Iaz- zourene, G. Kurdi...

    2015

  47. [55]

    Rossbach, J

    J. Rossbach, J. R. Schneider, and W. Wurth, 10 years of pioneering X-ray science at the Free-Electron Laser FLASH at DESY, Physics Reports 808, 1 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    B. L. Henke, E. M. Gullikson, and J. C. Davis, X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at e= 50-30,000 ev, z= 1-92, Atomic data and nuclear data tables 54, 181 (1993)

    1993

  49. [57]

    D. Rupp, L. Fl¨ uckiger, M. Adolph, A. Colombo, T. Gorkhover, M. Harmand, M. Krikunova, J. P. M¨ uller, T. Oelze, Y. Ovcharenko, et al. , Imaging plasma for- mation in isolated nanoparticles with ultrafast resonant scattering, Structural Dynamics 7, 034303 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    A. A. Lutman, J. P. MacArthur, M. Ilchen, A. O. Lindahl, J. Buck, R. N. Coffee, G. L. Dakovski, L. Dammann, Y. Ding, H. A. D¨ urr, et al. , Polarization control in an x-ray free-electron laser, Nature photonics 10, 468 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Kittel, A

    C. Kittel, A. Sarracini, S. Augustin, N. Yang, A. Al Had- dad, E. Ferrari, G. Knopp, J. Knurr, A. S. Morillo- Candas, I. Swiderska, et al., Demonstration of full polar- ization control of soft x-ray pulses with apple x undula- tors at swissfel using recoil ion momentum spectro...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Allaria, B

    E. Allaria, B. Diviacco, C. Callegari, P. Finetti, B. Mahieu, J. Viefhaus, M. Zangrando, G. De Ninno, G. Lambert, E. Ferrari, et al. , Control of the polar- ization of a vacuum-ultraviolet, high-gain, free-electron laser, Physical Review X 4, 041040 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    J. Yan, H. Hao, S. Huang, J. Li, V. N. Litvinenko, P. Liu, S. F. Mikhailov, V. G. Popov, G. Swift, N. A. Vinokurov, et al., Polarization control of a free-electron laser oscilla- tor using helical undulators of opposite helicities, Physi- cal Review Accelerators and Beams 23, ...

    2020

  54. [62]

    Marotzke, D

    S. Marotzke, D. Gupta, R.-P. Wang, M. Pavelka, S. Dziarzhytski, C. von Korff Schmising, S. Jana, N. Thielemann-K¨ uhn, T. Amrhein, M. Weinelt, et al. , First experiments with ultrashort, circularly polarized soft x-ray pulses at flash2, Structural Dynamics 12 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    St¨ ohr, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy of transition metal thin films, Journal of Electron Spec- troscopy and Related Phenomena 75, 253 (1995)

    J. St¨ ohr, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy of transition metal thin films, Journal of Electron Spec- troscopy and Related Phenomena 75, 253 (1995)

    1995

  56. [64]

    Cireasa, A

    R. Cireasa, A. Boguslavskiy, B. Pons, M. Wong, D. Descamps, S. Petit, H. Ruf, N. Thir´ e, A. Ferr´ e, J. Suarez, et al. , Probing molecular chirality on a sub- femtosecond timescale, Nature Physics 11, 654 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    S. B. Wilkins, P. D. Spencer, P. D. Hatton, S. P. Collins, M. D. Roper, D. Prabhakaran, and A. T. Boothroyd, Direct observation of orbital ordering in la 0.5sr1.5mno4 using soft x-ray diffraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167205 (2003)

    2003

  58. [66]

    J. R. Fienup, Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison, Appl. Opt. 21, 2758 (1982)

    1982

  59. [67]

    Abbey, L

    B. Abbey, L. W. Whitehead, H. M. Quiney, D. J. Vine, G. A. Cadenazzi, C. A. Henderson, K. A. Nugent, E. Bal- aur, C. T. Putkunz, A. G. Peele, et al., Lensless imaging using broadband x-ray sources, Nature Photonics 5, 420 (2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    Huijts, S

    J. Huijts, S. Fernandez, D. Gauthier, M. Kholodtsova, A. Maghraoui, K. Medjoubi, A. Somogyi, W. Boutu, and H. Merdji, Broadband coherent diffractive imaging, Na- ture Photonics 14, 618 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    C. Chen, H. Gu, and S. Liu, Ultra-broadband diffractive imaging with unknown probe spectrum, Light: Science & Applications 13, 213 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    D. Rupp, N. Monserud, B. Langbehn, M. Sauppe, J. Zim- mermann, Y. Ovcharenko, T. M¨ oller, F. Frassetto, L. Po- letto, A. Trabattoni, et al. , Coherent diffractive imaging of single helium nanodroplets with a high harmonic gen- eration source, Nature communications 8, 493 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    J. Miao, D. Sayre, and H. N. Chapman, Phase retrieval from the magnitude of the fourier transforms of nonperi- odic objects, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1662 (1998)

    1998

  64. [72]

    Favre-Nicolin, F

    V. Favre-Nicolin, F. Mastropietro, J. Eymery, D. Ca- macho, Y. Niquet, B. Borg, M. Messing, L.-E. Werners- son, R. Algra, E. Bakkers, et al. , Analysis of strain and stacking faults in single nanowires using bragg coherent diffraction imaging, New Journal of Physics 12, 035013 (2010)

    2010

  65. [73]

    Guizar-Sicairos and P

    M. Guizar-Sicairos and P. Thibault, Ptychography: A so- lution to the phase problem, Physics Today74, 42 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Colombo, D

    A. Colombo, D. E. Galli, L. De Caro, F. Scattarella, and E. Carlino, Facing the phase problem in coherent diffrac- tive imaging via memetic algorithms, Sci. Rep. 7, 42236 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Z. Sun, A. Al Haddad, S. Augustin, G. Knopp, J. Knurr, K. Schnorr, and C. Bostedt, Ultrafast single-particle imaging with intense x-ray pulses, Chimia76, 529 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    PSI, Swissfel maloja experimental station (Aug 2025), https://www.psi.ch/en/swissfel/maloja

    2025

  69. [77]

    Bielecki, M

    J. Bielecki, M. F. Hantke, B. J. Daurer, H. K. Reddy, D. Hasse, D. S. Larsson, L. H. Gunn, M. Svenda, A. Munke, J. A. Sellberg, et al. , Electrospray sample in- jection for single-particle imaging with x-ray lasers, Sci- ence Advances 5, eaav8801 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    M. F. Hantke, J. Bielecki, O. Kulyk, D. Westphal, D. S. Larsson, M. Svenda, H. K. Reddy, R. A. Kirian, J. Andreasson, J. Hajdu, et al. , Rayleigh-scattering mi- croscopy for tracking and sizing nanoparticles in focused aerosol beams, IUCrJ 5, 673 (2018). 19

    2018

  71. [79]

    Mozzanica, M

    A. Mozzanica, M. Andr¨ a, R. Barten, A. Bergamaschi, S. Chiriotti, M. Br¨ uckner, R. Dinapoli, E. Fr¨ ojdh, D. Greiffenberg, F. Leonarski, et al. , The jungfrau de- tector for applications at synchrotron light sources and xfels, Synchrotron Radiation News 31, 16 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    SQS, Small Quantum Systems Instrument (Aug 2025), https://www.xfel.eu/facility/instruments/ sqs/index_eng.html

    2025

  73. [81]

    Tschentscher, C

    T. Tschentscher, C. Bressler, J. Gr¨ unert, A. Madsen, A. P. Mancuso, M. Meyer, A. Scherz, H. Sinn, and U. Za- strau, Photon beam transport and scientific instruments at the european xfel, Applied Sciences 7, 592 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    Mazza, T

    T. Mazza, T. M. Baumann, R. Boll, A. De Fa- nis, P. Grychtol, M. Ilchen, J. Monta˜ no, V. Music, Y. Ovcharenko, N. Rennhack, D. E. Rivas, A. R¨ orig, P. Schmidt, S. Usenko, P. Zio lkowski, D. La Civita, M. Vannoni, H. Sinn, B. Keitel, E. Pl¨ onjes, U. F. Jastrow, A. Sorokin, K...

    2023

  75. [83]

    Decking, S

    W. Decking, S. Abeghyan, P. Abramian, A. Abramsky, A. Aguirre, C. Albrecht, P. Alou, M. Altarelli, P. Alt- mann, K. Amyan, et al. , A mhz-repetition-rate hard x- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator, Nat. Photonics 14, 391 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Mie, Beitr¨ age zur Optik tr¨ uber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metall¨ osungen, Annalen der Physik 10.1002/andp.19083300302 (1908)

    G. Mie, Beitr¨ age zur Optik tr¨ uber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metall¨ osungen, Annalen der Physik 10.1002/andp.19083300302 (1908)

    1908 doi

  77. [85]

    Bostedt, H

    C. Bostedt, H. Thomas, M. Hoener, T. M¨ oller, U. Saal- mann, I. Georgescu, C. Gnodtke, and J.-M. Rost, Fast electrons from multi-electron dynamics in xenon clus- ters induced by inner-shell ionization, New J. Phys. 12, 083004 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.