Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Topological Magnon Frequency Combs

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lattice can host magnon frequency combs whose comb teeth are carried by topologically protected chiral edge states.

desk verdict Plausible new phenomenon—topological magnon frequency combs—with solid numerics, but the four-magnon mechanism is asserted rather than derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21743 v1 pith:2PMT3IHM submitted 2025-08-29 cond-mat.mes-hall

Zhixiong Li , Xuejuan Liu , Zhejunyu Jin , Guanghua Guo , Xingen Zheng , Peng Yan This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnonfrequencycombtopologicalmagnonicsskyrmionlatticeChernnumberchiraledgestatesfour-magnonscatteringdual-frequencydrivingmicromagneticsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lattice can support magnon frequency combs carried by topologically protected chiral edge states. The authors claim the comb arises from nonlinear four-magnon scattering among topological edge magnons, activated by a dual-frequency drive, and that no amplitude threshold is needed. If true, magnonic frequency combs could be generated in a defect-immune way, with comb spacing tuned by the frequency detuning of the drive. This would extend frequency-comb technology from optics and photonics into magnonics while adding nonlinear functionality to topological magnon devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nominal four-magnon Hamiltonian H4 = ω1a1†a1 + ω2a2†a2 + ωpap†ap + g(a1†ap†a2^2 + H.c.) plus a dual-frequency drive. In a rotating frame, its Heisenberg equations admit steady states with the scattered-mode amplitude scaling as ap ∝ h^3/(α^3...), which encodes the threshold-free comb generation. The resonance condition 2ω2 = ω1 + ωp sets the first sideband, and iterating the detuning Δ produces all comb teeth. Topological protection enters through the Chern-number edge states of the linear magnon Hamiltonian, which supply the chiral modes that the nonlinearity couples.

What would settle it

Measure the magnon power spectrum of the same skyrmion lattice under dual-frequency drive across a range of amplitudes and detunings, and compare the first sideband's intensity to the Heisenberg solution ap ∝ h^3/(α^3...). If the sideband amplitude deviates strongly from cubic scaling in the drive field, or if comb teeth persist when the topological edge gap is closed, the threshold-free four-magnon origin and topological protection would be contradicted. A microscopic derivation of g from the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) would also settle whether this coupling dominates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lattice, with material parameters typical of Co|Pt interfaces, hosts topological magnon edge states whose nonlinear interactions generate a frequency comb. The comb teeth are carried by chiral edge modes, localized at the boundaries and propagating counterclockwise, protected by nonzero Chern numbers. The mechanism is a four-magnon scattering process 2ω2 → ω1 + ωp among pumped and scattered topological magnon modes, activated by driving with two frequencies f1 and f2; the comb spacing equals Δf = f2 − f1. The paper argues this process has no amplitude threshold, unlike three-magnon mechanisms, and supports the claim with microma

Load-bearing premise

The analytical mechanism assumes a phenomenological four-magnon coupling term, not derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian, dominates the nonlinear dynamics of the topological edge magnons; if that coupling is not dominant, the claimed four-magnon origin and threshold-free scaling are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Comb spacing is set directly by the drive detuning, so a single skyrmion-lattice device could produce arbitrary spacings without changing material or geometry.
  • Because comb teeth live in topological edge states, scattering from defects, disorder, and sharp 90-degree corners should not destroy the comb, enabling defect-immune magnonic signal processing.
  • The absence of an amplitude threshold means combs can be generated at very low drive fields, in simulations down to 0.01 mT, reducing heating and spurious nonlinear effects.
  • The same four-magnon mechanism can be sought in other topological magnon platforms where linear edge-state gaps exist but conventional soliton-based comb generation is inefficient.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phenomenological coupling g is the dominant nonlinearity, the comb should be reproducible in any skyrmion lattice with overlapping edge modes satisfying the 2ω2 resonance; a direct microscopic derivation of g would predict which materials work best.
  • The narrow edge-state bandwidth of about 5 GHz limits the usable frequency range and number of comb teeth; extending the idea to wider-gap topological magnon systems or tuning magnetic field could broaden the comb.
  • A natural testable extension is to measure the comb's phase coherence or linewidth across the edge, analogous to optical self-referencing; the paper does not report comb linewidth or phase noise.
  • The analytical model keeps only one scattered mode ap, so multimode extensions may reveal additional sideband interactions or amplitude-dependent frequency shifts not captured here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes topological magnon frequency combs (MFCs) in a two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lattice. It computes Chern numbers of the magnon bands, identifies chiral edge states in ribbon geometry, and confirms the band structure with micromagnetic simulations. Under dual-frequency driving, the simulations show FFT spectra with sidebands spaced by the drive detuning, localized at the edges and robust at sharp corners. The authors attribute the comb to four-magnon scattering among topological edge magnons, and support this with a phenomenological Hamiltonian (Eq. (4)) whose steady-state solutions yield threshold-free sideband generation. The paper also claims tunability of the comb spacing and contrasts the result with topologically trivial MFCs.

Significance. If the mechanism claim holds, the paper would extend frequency-comb generation to topologically protected magnonic edge states, offering defect-immune nonlinear magnonic devices with tunable comb spacing. The Chern-number and edge-state analysis is standard and appears sound, and the micromagnetic spectra in Figs. 4(c)-(d) provide a concrete demonstration of detuning-controlled comb-like lines down to h=0.01 mT. The main weakness is that the analytical four-magnon model is not derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian Eq. (1) and is not quantitatively compared with the micromagnetic FFT spectra; the central causal claim therefore rests on an assumed nonlinearity rather than on a demonstrated microscopic process.

major comments (4)
  1. [Topological MFCs, Eq. (4)] The four-magnon coupling g(a1^dagger ap a2^2 + H.c.) is postulated rather than derived. I could not find a derivation from the microscopic Hamiltonian Eq. (1) via Holstein-Primakoff expansion to quartic order and projection onto the chiral edge modes, nor an estimate of g. Since g is a free parameter, the analytical model cannot establish that the simulated MFCs "originate from nonlinear four-magnon scattering among the chiral edge modes" as stated in the Abstract. The threshold-free scaling in Eq. (6) follows from the polynomial structure of Eq. (4) and is therefore not independent evidence. A microscopic derivation of g, or a quantitative comparison of the predicted sideband scaling with the micromagnetic FFT (e.g., sideband amplitude versus h), is needed to identify the dominant nonlinear process.
  2. [Topological MFCs, Eq. (6) and Fig. 4(b)] The steady-state solutions of Eq. (6) yield a single scattered mode ap at frequency f1^+ = 2f2 - f1. They do not generate the multiple teeth f2^+, f2^-, f3^+, f3^- shown in Fig. 4(b) or the multi-line spectra in Figs. 4(c)-(d). The comb spacing Delta f is effectively inserted via the rotating-frame ansatz (a2 ~ e^{-i Delta2 t}, ap ~ e^{-2i Delta2 t}) rather than derived. Moreover, no quantitative comparison is made between the Heisenberg solutions and the micromagnetic FFT spectra. As a result, the observed multi-tooth comb is not shown to be produced specifically by the four-magnon term in Eq. (4) rather than by other nonlinear channels, such as bulk magnon nonlinearities, the Tamm-Shockley state ES1, or three-magnon processes.
  3. [Topological MFCs, Supplemental Sec. C] The paper excludes three-magnon processes by reference to Sec. C of the Supplemental Material [43], but that supplement is not included in the submitted text. Because ruling out three-magnon processes is essential to the mechanism claim, this missing support must be supplied for review. The main text should either state the relevant argument or the supplement must be provided.
  4. [Topological MFCs, Eq. (6)] The Heisenberg equations of motion appear inconsistent with the Hermitian Hamiltonian Eq. (4). For the coupling g(a1^dagger ap a2^2 + H.c.), the commutator [a1, H] contains g ap^dagger a2^dagger^2 (up to g*), not g ap^dagger a2 a2 as written; the equation for da2/dt also does not match the Hamiltonian-derived term structure. Since the steady-state solutions and the claimed threshold-free behavior are derived from Eq. (6), this algebraic discrepancy should be corrected and re-verified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4(b) caption] The labels f1^+, f1^-, f2^+, f2^-, f3^+, f3^- are used in the text but not all are identified in the figure; please clarify the notation in the caption or annotate the panel.
  2. [Model section] The relation between the inter-skyrmion distance d=40 nm and the lattice constant a=2 nm is not explicit. Please define the unit cell size and how the parameters map to the skyrmion lattice.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The projector formula is compressed; a brief explanation of the notation (eta, Gamma_j) and the non-Hermitian Berry connection would improve readability.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: four-magnon mechanism assumed in Eq. (4), but micromagnetic simulations provide independent support for the comb itself.

  1. self definitional [Topological MFCs, Eq. (4) and surrounding text]
    "For analytical insight, we construct a Hamiltonian capturing four-magnon scattering ... where a1 and a2 denote the incident topological magnon modes at frequencies ω1/2π = f1 and ω2/2π = f2, respectively, and ap represents the scattered magnon mode at ωp/2π = f+1, satisfying 2ω2 = ω1 + ωp."

    The Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) is an ansatz: the g(a1†ap a2^2 + H.c.) term is introduced, not derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian Eq. (1). The energy-conserving condition 2ω2 = ω1 + ωp is imposed, so the resulting comb spacing Δf = f2 − f1 is an input, not an emergent prediction. The threshold-free scaling ap ≈ gh^3/(...) also follows from the polynomial form of this assumed term. The micromagnetic simulations demonstrate that a comb exists, but they are not used to show that this specific g-term is the operative nonlinearity; the paper does not compare Eq. (6) to the FFT spectra or compute g from Eq. (1). Hence the causal claim that MFCs 'originate from nonlinear four-magnon scattering' is built into the model rather than independently established.

  2. other [Topological MFCs, after Fig. 4(b) description]
    "We ascertain that topological MFC formation is chiefly mediated by four-magnon scattering, not three-magnon processes (see Sec. C of Supplemental Material [43] for details)."

    The main text's only support for excluding three-magnon processes and for the microscopic origin of the four-magnon coupling is a reference to Supplemental Sec. C, which is not included in the manuscript. This is an omitted proof of the central causal claim. Because the mechanism is the paper's headline claim, the missing derivation is load-bearing; it leaves the 'origin' assertion as an assumption rather than a demonstrated result.

full rationale

The paper's central demonstration—topological MFCs in a triangular skyrmion lattice—is supported by MuMax3 micromagnetic simulations of the full Hamiltonian Eq. (1), which is an external benchmark. That part is independent and not circular. However, the causal mechanism claim is not derived: the four-magnon coupling g in Eq. (4) is posited, and the analytic consequences (comb spacing equal to drive detuning, threshold-free scaling) follow from that posited term by construction. The paper does not derive g from the HP expansion of Eq. (1), nor quantitatively compare Eq. (6) with the micromagnetic FFT spectra. The exclusion of alternative mechanisms is deferred to a Supplemental Sec. C not present in the manuscript. Thus the analytical 'origin' statement is partially circular, but the existence of the comb and its edge localization are not. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present. Overall score 4 reflects partial circularity in the mechanism identification while acknowledging independent simulation support.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or material constituents. The new element is a proposed phenomenon, topological magnon frequency combs, built from known ingredients. The main ledger items are the ad hoc four-magnon coupling and the hand-chosen drive parameters that set the comb spacing by construction.

free parameters (5)
  • Four-magnon coupling strength g
    Introduced ad hoc in Eq. (4); no microscopic derivation or numerical value. The steady-state comb amplitude ap approximately gh^3 depends on this parameter.
  • Drive detuning Delta f = f2 - f1 = 0.3 GHz (example)
    Chosen by hand. The comb spacing is set equal to Delta f by the four-magnon resonance condition, so the tunable spacing is an input, not an emergent prediction.
  • Excitation frequency f1 = 92 GHz
    Chosen to lie within the topological edge-state frequency window. The result depends on driving the chiral edge modes.
  • Drive amplitude h = 0.01 to 1 mT
    Chosen for simulations. The no-threshold claim is tested only over this finite range.
  • Mode-independent damping rate alpha = 0.001 for spectra, 0.01 for comb
    Assumed equal for modes a1, a2, ap in Eq. (6) to obtain the closed-form solution; standard Gilbert form but the equality is an approximation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Holstein-Primakoff transformation and linear spin-wave expansion provide an accurate magnon description of the skyrmion-lattice ground state.
    Used to obtain the magnon Hamiltonian and band structure; assumes small deviations from the static Neel skyrmion texture.
  • domain assumption The static triangular Neel skyrmion lattice remains rigid during driving.
    The analytical model and simulations start from a perfect skyrmion lattice; skyrmion displacement or breathing is not treated in the analytical model.
  • standard math Chern-number bulk-boundary correspondence holds for this magnon system.
    Used to map computed Chern numbers to the number and chirality of edge states.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective four-magnon Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) captures the dominant nonlinearity.
    The coupling term is postulated, not derived from Eq. (1); if other nonlinearities dominate, the claimed mechanism changes.
  • ad hoc to paper Weak-nonlinearity and equal-damping steady-state approximations in Eq. (6) are quantitatively valid.
    These approximations produce the closed-form ap approximately gh^3 result but are not justified against the micromagnetic simulation amplitudes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Magnon Frequency Combs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2PMT3IHM

@misc{pith2026250821743,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Magnon Frequency Combs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2PMT3IHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21743}
}
read the original abstract

Exploring the synergy between topological physics and nonlinear dynamics unveils profound insights into emergent states of matter. Inspired by recent experimental demonstrations of topological frequency combs in photonics, we theoretically introduce topological magnon frequency combs (MFCs) in a two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lattice. Computing the Chern numbers of magnon bands reveals robust chiral edge states. Strikingly, these topological MFCs originate from nonlinear four-magnon scattering among the chiral edge modes, activated by dual-frequency driving without an amplitude threshold. Comb spacings are readily tunable through excitation frequency detuning. Micromagnetic simulations validate our predictions with good concordance. This work paves the way for defect-immune magnonic devices exploiting MFCs and sparks investigations into topological-nonlinear phenomena in magnetic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21743 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of a two-dimensional triangular skyrmion lat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Magnon band structure of an infinite 2D skyrmion lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Schematic of the 2D skyrmion lattice with excitation field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Single-Shot Realization of 10000-Mode Octave-Spanning Artificial Gauge Fields

    physics.optics 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    First frequency-comb realization of the integer quantum Hall model for photons via octave-spanning, multi-modal artificial gauge fields controlled by Kerr nonlinearity.

  2. Spin-Hall-Like Magnon Transport in a Synthetic Antiferromagnetic Skyrmion Lattice

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Synthetic antiferromagnetic skyrmion lattices support layer-polarized spin-Hall-like magnon edge modes from opposing layer Hall responses, not Z2 topology, due to absent pseudo-time-reversal symmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [43]

    for details). The topological nature of the j-th magnon band is captured by the Chern number [31, 47] C j = 1 2π Z BZ d2kB j(k), (2) with the Berry curvature B j(k) = iTr " P j(k) ∂P j(k) ∂kx ∂P j(k) ∂ky − ∂P j(k) ∂ky ∂P j(k) ∂kx !# . (3) The integral covers the full Brillouin zone (BZ), andP j(k) = Ψ j(k)ηΓ jΨ j(k)†η projects onto the j-th band [24]. Her...

    work page

  2. [1]

    T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. H ¨ansch, Optical frequency metrology, Nature (London) 416, 233 (2002)

    work page 2002

  3. [2]

    Del’Haye, A

    P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optical frequency comb gen- eration from a monolithic microresonator, Nature (London) 450, 1214 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [3]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  5. [4]

    Lezius, T

    M. Lezius, T. Wilken, C. Deutsch, M. Giunta, O. Mandel, A. Thaller, V . Schkolnik, M. Schiemangk, A. Dinkelaker, A. Kohfeldt, A. Wicht, M. Krutzik, A. Peters, O. Hellmig, H. Duncker, K. Sengstock, P. Windpassinger, K. Lampmann, T. H¨ulsing, T. W. H ¨ansch, and R. Holzwarth, Space-borne fre- quency comb metrology, Optica 3, 1381 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [5]

    Picque and T

    N. Picque and T. W. Hansch, Frequency comb spectroscopy, Nat. Photon. 13, 146 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    L. S. Cao, D. X. Qi, R. W. Peng, M. Wang, and P. Schmelcher, Phononic frequency combs through nonlinear res- onances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 075505 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Ganesan, C

    A. Ganesan, C. Do, and A. Seshia, Phononic frequency comb via intrinsic three-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 033903 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    D. A. Czaplewski, C. Chen, and D. Lopez, O. Shoshani, A. M. Eriksson, S. Strachan, and S. W. Shaw, Bifurcation gener- ated mechanical frequency comb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 244302 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Z. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, Z.-X. Li, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Magnonic frequency comb through nonlinear magnon- skyrmion scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037202 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Z. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, and P. Yan, Twisted magnon fre- quency comb and Penrose superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 107203 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Z. Jin, X. Yao, Z. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, Z. Zeng, W. Wang, Y . Cao, and P. Yan, Nonlinear topological magnon spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 166704 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    X. Yao, Z. Jin, Z. Wang, Z. Zeng, and P. Yan, Terahertz magnon frequency comb, Phys. Rev. B 108, 134427 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    Z.-X. Liu, J. Peng, and H. Xiong, Generation of magnonic fre- quency combs via a two-tone microwave drive, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053708 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    T. Hula, K. Schultheiss, F. J. T. Gonc ¸alves, L. K ¨orber, M. Bejarano, M. Copus, L. Flacke, L. Liensberger, A. Buz- dakov, A. K ´akay, M. Weiler, R. Camley, J. Fassbender, and H. Schultheiss, Spin-wave frequency combs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 112404 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Z. W. Zhou, X. G. Wang, Y . Z. Nie, Q. L. Xia, and G. H. Guo, Spin wave frequency comb generated through interaction be- tween propagating spin wave and oscillating domain wall, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 534, 168046 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    J. W. Rao, B. Yao, C. Y . Wang, C. Zhang, T. Yu, and W. Lu, Un- veiling a pump-induced magnon mode via its strong interaction with walker modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 046705 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y . Wang, Z. Shen, G.-C. Guo, and C.- H. Dong, Magnonic frequency comb in the magnomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 243601 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Y . Liu, T. Liu, Q. Yang, G. Tian, Z. Hou, D. Chen, Z. Fan, M. Zeng, X. Lu, X. Gao, M. Qin, and J. Liu, Design of controllable magnon frequency comb in synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174412 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    L. Shen, L. Qiu, and K. Shen, Nonlinear dynamics of di- rectly coupled skyrmions in ferrimagnetic spin torque nano- oscillators, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 48 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    C. Wang, J. Rao, Z. Chen, K. Zhao, L. Sun, B. Yao, T. Yu, Y .-P. Wang, and W. Lu, Enhancement of magnonic frequency combs by exceptional points, Nat. Phys. 20, 1139 (2024)

    2024

  14. [21]

    Zhang, Z

    C. Zhang, Z. Jin, X. Liu, and P. Yan, Anisotropic magnon frequency comb based on antiferromagnetic bimerons, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 052401 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    Liang, Y

    X. Liang, Y . Cao, P. Yan, and Y . Zhou, Asymmetric magnon frequency comb, Nano Lett. 24, 6730 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    X. Liu, Z. Jin, Z. Li, Z. Zeng, M. Li, Y . Yao, Y . Cao, Y . Zhang, and P. Yan, Low-lying magnon frequency comb in skyrmion crystals, Phys. Rev. B 110, 184413 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    X. S. Wang and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 151101 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    P. A. McClarty, Topological magnons: a review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 171 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Z.-X. Li, Y . Cao, and P. Yan,Topology in collective magnetiza- tion dynamics (IOP, Bristol, UK, 2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    T. Yu, J. Zou, B. Zeng, J. W. Rao, and K. Xia, Non-Hermitian topological magnonics, Phys. Rep. 1062, 1 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    X. S. Wang, H. W. Zhang, and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics: a paradigm for spin-wave manipulation and device design, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 024029 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    Shindou, R

    R. Shindou, R. Matsumoto, S. Murakami, and J.-i. Ohe, Topo- logical chiral magnonic edge mode in a magnonic crystal, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174427 (2013)

    2013

  23. [30]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Edge states in topological magnon insulators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 024412 (2014)

    2014

  24. [31]

    X. S. Wang, Y . Su, and X. R. Wang, Topologically protected unidirectional edge spin waves and beam splitter, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014435 (2017)

    2017

  25. [32]

    C. J. Flower, M. J. Mehrabad, L. Xu, G. Moille, D. G. Suarez- Forero, O. ¨Orsel, G. Bahl, Y . Chembo, K. Srinivasan, S. Mittal, and M. Hafezi, Observation of topological frequency combs, Science 384, 1356 (2024)

    2024

  26. [33]

    Weber, D

    T. Weber, D. M. Fobes, J. Waizner, P. Ste ffens, G. S. Tucker, M. B ¨ohm, L. Beddrich, C. Franz, H. Gabold, R. Bewley, D. V oneshen, M. Skoulatos, R. Georgii, G. Ehlers, A. Bauer, C. Pfleiderer, P. B ¨oni, M. Janoschek, and M. Garst, Topological magnon band structure of emerge...

    2022

  27. [34]

    Rold ´an-Molina, A

    A. Rold ´an-Molina, A. S. Nunez, and J. Fern ´andez-Rossier, Topological spin waves in the atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion crystal, New J. Phys. 18, 045015 (2016)

    2016

  28. [35]

    S. A. D ´ıaz, T. Hirosawa, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Chiral magnonic edge states in ferromagnetic skyrmion crystals con- trolled by magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013231 (2020). 6

    2020

  29. [36]

    S. A. D´ıaz, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Topological magnons and edge states in antiferromagnetic skyrmion crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187203 (2019)

    2019

  30. [37]

    Chen and F

    Z. Chen and F. Ma, Skyrmion based magnonic crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 130, 090901 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    K. Xie, L. Zhang, and F. Ma, Magnonic topological insulator realized in 2D magnetic skyrmion crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 130, 153901 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    Wang, Y .-Z

    X.-G. Wang, Y .-Z. Nie, Q.-L. Xia, and G.-H. Guo, Dynam- ically reconfigurable magnonic crystal composed of artificial magnetic skyrmion lattice, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 063901 (2020)

    2020

  33. [40]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferro- magnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferro- magnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  34. [41]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  35. [42]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  36. [44]

    [9, 14, 34, 42, 44–46]

    See Supplemental Material at http: //link.aps.org/supplemental for an analytical derivation of magnon bands in the skyrmion lattice, the propagation characteristics of trivial and topological magnon edge states, the scattering mechanism of topological MFC, and the MFC generate...

  37. [45]

    J. H. P. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamilto- nian, Physica A 93, 327 (1978)

    1978

  38. [46]

    Moon, S.-M

    J.-H. Moon, S.-M. Seo, K.-J. Lee, K.-W. Kim, J. Ryu, H.-W. Lee, R. D. McMichael, and M. D. Stiles, Spin-wave propaga- tion in the presence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya inter- action, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184404 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Br ¨acher, O

    T. Br ¨acher, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P. Pirro, Creation of unidirectional spin-wave emitters by utilizing interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B 95, 064429 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, Homotopy and quan- tization in condensed matter physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 51 (1983)

    1983

  41. [49]

    Sampaio, V

    J. Sampaio, V . Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, Nucle- ation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    S. M. Rezende, Fundamentals of Magnonics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Atxitia, D

    U. Atxitia, D. Hinzke, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, U. Nowak, H. Kachkachi, O. N. Mryasov, R. F. Evans, and R. W. Chantrell, Multiscale modeling of magnetic materials: Temperature de- pendence of the exchange sti ffness, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134440 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insula- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quan- tum Hall effect, Phys

    Y . Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quan- tum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  47. [55]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. V . Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Tamm, ¨Uber eine m ¨ogliche Art der Elektronenbindung an Kristalloberfl¨achen, Phys

    I. Tamm, ¨Uber eine m ¨ogliche Art der Elektronenbindung an Kristalloberfl¨achen, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 76, 849 (1932)

    1932

  49. [57]

    Shockley, On the surface states associated with a periodic potential, Phys

    W. Shockley, On the surface states associated with a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. 56, 317 (1939)

    1939

  50. [58]

    T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferro- magnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    M ¨uhlbauer, B

    S. M ¨uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨oni, Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009)

    2009

  52. [60]

    X. Z. Yu, Y . Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y . Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature (London) 465, 901 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.