Dissipation in passive non-reciprocal microwave devices

Stefano Bosco

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Dissipation in passive non-reciprocal microwave devices

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Exact analytic response found for lossy Hall-effect microwave devices

desk verdict Solid analytic framework for dissipative non-reciprocal microwave devices, with a clean exact admittance result and a useful circuit model; the counter-rotating resonance prediction rests on a Drude formula that deserves a careful check. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00874 v1 pith:63L6TMRT submitted 2025-08-31 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Stefano Bosco This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

keywords non-reciprocalmicrowavedevicesHalleffectcirculatorgyratordissipationedgemagnetoplasmonsterminaladmittancematrixlocalcapacitanceapproximationkineticinductance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Passive non-reciprocal microwave components — gyrators and circulators made by capacitively coupling electrodes to a Hall material — have until now been described mainly in the lossless limit. This paper develops an analytic framework that includes dissipation and the material's full AC response: it solves the driven semiclassical boundary-value problem exactly, giving the terminal admittance matrix in Eq. (14) for a sharp-edged circular device with an arbitrary electrode layout. From that exact solution it derives a simple effective circuit — an ideal circulator with lossy stubs — and shows the circuit accurately reproduces the exact response at small dissipation and low frequency. The calculation also uncovers counterpropagating resonances, scaling linearly with magnetic field, that arise from the material's kinetic inductance and survive in the presence of loss; the paper argues these could be used to dynamically switch the direction of non-reciprocal signal flow. If true, this gives device designers a quantitative handle on losses in compact, on-chip non-reciprocal microwave technology.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the terminal admittance matrix Y_ij, obtained as an exact Fourier sum after the local capacitance approximation (V ≈ V̄ + ρ/c, with sharp edge) reduces the three-dimensional Poisson problem to the Laplace equation with a capacitive, chiral boundary condition. The interpretive engine is the circuit analog: an ideal anticlockwise circulator with characteristic impedance Z_c = 1/(2σ_0), each port terminated by a stub of impedance Z_j(ω) = (i/2σ_0) cot(ω L_j^φ/(2ω_R)). Dissipation enters by promoting σ_0 and ω_R to complex quantities, so both the circulation and the stubs become lossy; this single substitution carries the entire dissipative generalization. The intrinsi

What would settle it

Measure the two-port scattering matrix of a symmetric three-terminal Hall device as a function of frequency at fixed magnetic field, and repeat at several fields. If the counterpropagating resonance family predicted with ~B scaling does not appear, or if the main resonances shift with edge-profile smoothness in a way incompatible with Eq. (14), the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the terminal admittance matrix of a passive non-reciprocal microwave device, in the experimentally relevant regime, is captured exactly by Eq. (14) within a semiclassical model that retains dissipation through a complex Hall angle and frequency-dependent conductivity. The lossless quantum-Hall result is recovered as a special case, and small losses are captured by a compact circuit model in which the characteristic impedance of the circulator and the stub impedances become complex, via the substitutions in Eq. (20). The paper further claims that the intrinsic AC response of the material — specifically the kinetic-inductance part of the conductivity — produce

Load-bearing premise

The entire solution rests on replacing the real three-dimensional electrostatics with a local capacitance formula, V ≈ V̄ + ρ/c, and a perfectly sharp material edge; if real devices have smooth edges or non-local interactions, the predicted resonances and the circuit model would need modification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The lossy stub circuit model of Eqs. (20)–(22) can be used directly in device design: it reproduces the exact response in the low-frequency, small-dissipation regime with quantitatively small error.
In the quantum Hall limit the response is universal and geometry-independent; adding dissipation through a finite Hall angle preserves the resonance structure while broadening and damping the peaks.
Counterpropagating resonances scale with B, so they can be cleanly separated from parasitic extrinsic resonances, which scale with 1/B.
Because the counter-resonances survive at finite loss and are as strong as the direct ones, the same device can transmit in either direction at different frequency windows without changing the sign of the magnetic field.
The framework applies to an arbitrary number of terminals and asymmetric electrode layouts, covering gyrators, circulators, and self-matched designs in one formalism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural experimental next step is to map the scattering parameters of a three-terminal Hall circulator over a two-dimensional grid of frequency and magnetic field; the predicted B and 1/B families of resonances would be a direct, distinguishing signature of the mechanism.
If the counter-resonance mechanism works in anomalous Hall materials, which the paper's model includes, it could yield magnetic-field-free tunable non-reciprocity — a goal the paper does not explicitly pursue.
The sharp-edge, local-capacitance solution is likely the leading term of a richer family: smoother edges add multiple edge modes, so the model's predictions should be most accurate for gate-defined, nearly sharp boundaries, and deviations at smooth boundaries would be informative rather than disqualifying.
A quantitative comparison between Eq. (14) and full-wave electromagnetic simulation would locate the boundary where the local capacitance approximation fails, setting the practical validity range of the model.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper does something genuinely useful: it gives an exact analytic solution for the terminal admittance of a capacitive-coupled Hall device at arbitrary Hall angle, including dissipation and AC frequency response. Equation (14) is the key new result, and the lossy stub circuit model in Eqs. (20)-(22) is a neat simplification that they benchmark against the exact solution in Fig. 2. That part is well executed and worth having.

The derivation from the semiclassical equations is internally consistent, and the paper is careful to show where the approximate circuit model works and where it doesn't. The main limitations—local capacitance and sharp-edge approximations—are standard in this literature and honestly acknowledged.

Soft spots: the F-function identity in Eq. (14c) is stated without a derivation. It's probably right, but a referee should ask for a check or a reference. More importantly, the counter-rotating resonances in Sec. IV.C depend on the specific Drude parametrization in Eq. (3a). A stress-test has flagged that Eq. (3a) may be missing a square root in the denominator, which would make the AC Drude conductivity incorrect and could change the B-scaling of those resonances. Looking at the extracted text, the symbol is ambiguous—the OCR could easily have lost a radical. If the square root is actually there, the concern vanishes. But the paper should state the formula unambiguously and verify the Fig. 4 results against the standard Drude expression, because the claim that these counter-circulating resonances scale ∝ B is the most novel and the least secure part of the paper.

Note that this potential issue does not touch the main analytic framework: Eq. (14) is independent of the specific Drude model. The circuit model also stands on its own. So the core of the paper is solid, but the flashiest prediction needs a clear confirmation.

This paper is for people designing compact on-chip circulators/gyrators with Hall or anomalous Hall materials, and for circuit theorists wanting a compact dissipative model. It deserves peer review; the kernel is strong, but I'd ask the author to clarify Eq. (3a) and provide at least a sketch of the Hurwitz-Lerch manipulation in (14c). If the Drude issue turns out to be real, the counter-resonance section should be revised or qualified.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic semiclassical framework for microwave devices based on a circular two-dimensional Hall-type conductor capacitively coupled to external electrodes. Starting from coupled Poisson, continuity, and Ohm equations, the authors derive an exact terminal admittance matrix in the local-capacitance and sharp-interface limits (Eq. (14)), recover the known lossless quantum-Hall gyrator/circulator response, and propose a lossy stub circuit model (Eqs. (20)-(22)) that is benchmarked against the exact solution in Fig. 2. The paper's central new claim, made in Sec. IV.C and Fig. 4, is that the intrinsic AC response of the Drude material produces counterpropagating, clockwise resonances that scale linearly with magnetic field, in contrast to the usual 1/B scaling of the primary plasmon resonances.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would provide a useful analytic tool and a simple circuit description for dissipative non-reciprocal microwave devices, extending earlier lossless quantum-Hall treatments and offering a concrete route to dynamically tunable non-reciprocity. The derivation from the stated semiclassical model to Eq. (14) is internally consistent, and the benchmarking of the lossy circuit model in Fig. 2(c) is a genuine strength. However, the most novel prediction depends critically on the AC Drude parameterization in Eq. (3), and that parameterization is not the standard AC Drude conductivity. Because the counter-circulating resonances are computed from this nonstandard conductivity, the paper's headline result is not currently supported.

major comments (2)

[Eq. (3a) and Sec. IV.C] The AC Drude conductivity is mis-specified. For the tensor in Eq. (2), consistency with the standard Drude model requires sigma_0 = (n_S e^2 tau/m*)/sqrt(D), with D = (1 - i omega tau)^2 + (omega_c tau)^2. As written, sigma_0 has an extra factor 1/sqrt(D), so both sigma_xx and sigma_xy are too small by that factor. In particular, at DC and large B, the paper's Eq. (3a) gives sigma_xy -> 0, whereas the classical Hall value is n_S e/B. Section III.B.2 quietly resets sigma_0 to e^2 nu/h in the quantum-Hall limit, but Sec. IV.C does not. Since Fig. 4 and the counterpropagating-resonance claim are computed from Eq. (3), the main new prediction is not based on the stated physical model. This must be corrected and Fig. 4 re-evaluated.
[Eq. (3b) and Fig. 4 caption] The definition of theta_H is inconsistent and not well posed. Eq. (3b) writes theta_H = arctan2(omega_c tau, 1 - i omega tau), but arctan2 is defined for real arguments only; with a complex second argument one must specify the branch of the complex arctangent or define the tensor directly through its components. The Fig. 4 caption instead writes theta_H = arctan2(omega_c tau, 1 - omega tau), which is a different, real-valued expression. This ambiguity directly affects the frequency- and field-dependent conductivity used in the central numerical study. Please replace Eq. (3) with a proper complex conductivity tensor and derive the corresponding angle (or use the components explicitly), and ensure Eq. (3b), the main text, and Fig. 4 all use the same definition.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (14c)] The closed-form expression for F(omega, phi, theta) involving Hurwitz-Lerch functions is stated without derivation. Because Eq. (14) is central to the paper’s exact solution, please provide a derivation or at least a clear reference for this identity.
[Eq. (3a) and Fig. 4 caption] There are notation inconsistencies: Eq. (3a) uses tau_p in the numerator but tau in the denominator, and the Fig. 4 caption uses theta_H = arctan2(omega_c tau, 1 - omega tau) while Eq. (3b) has 1 - i omega tau. These should be harmonized.
[Sec. III.B.2] Minor typo: 'yeilding' should be 'yielding'.
[Sec. II and III.A] The local-capacitance approximation (Eq. (5)) and the sharp-interface limit l->0 are restrictive, as the paper acknowledges. It would be helpful to state more explicitly in the Conclusion that the exact solution and the generalized circuit model are expected to hold only when these approximations are valid, and to point to Ref. [57] for smooth-edge deviations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation is self-contained from the semiclassical model, and the circuit model is verified against the exact solution rather than being a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the terminal admittance matrix of Eq. (14) and the resulting counterpropagating resonances—is derived explicitly from the stated semiclassical model. Starting from Eqs. (1)–(4), the paper adopts the local capacitance approximation (Eq. (5)) and sharp-interface limit to obtain the boundary condition Eq. (7), then solves the Laplace equation with Fourier modes to obtain the exact solution Eq. (14). The counterpropagating resonances in Section IV.C are a direct consequence of inserting the frequency-dependent Drude conductivity Eq. (3) into this analytic solution; no parameter is fitted to the predicted resonances, and the resonances are not assumed in the model. The lossy stub circuit model (Eqs. (20)–(22)) is introduced as an approximation to the exact solution in the small-dissipation, low-frequency regime, and then compared against Eq. (14) in Figs. 2 and 3. This is a verification of an ansatz, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The paper does rely on several self-citations (Refs. 49–51, 53) for the input formalism and for the lossless circuit model, but the essential exact solution is re-derived here, and the lossy circuit model is checked internally against that exact solution, so these citations are not load-bearing in a circular way. The skeptic's concern about Eq. (3a) possibly missing a √D factor is a correctness issue about the input conductivity model, not a circularity: even if that equation were incorrect, the derivation chain would still be non-circular, just potentially wrong. No step in the chain reduces, by definition or by fitted construction, to its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on four modeling assumptions: local capacitance, sharp edges, full electrode coverage, and the Drude form of the conductivity. No free parameters are fitted to data; σ0, θH, c, R, and Lφ are physical inputs. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Local capacitance approximation: V ≈ V̄ + ρ/c (Eq. 5) replaces the 3D Poisson equation.
This approximation is standard in the field (Ref. 58) but breaks for non-local screening or smooth edge profiles; it is load-bearing for the exact solution in Eq. (14).
domain assumption Sharp interface limit l→0, so ρ ∝ n' ≈ -δ(r-R).
The exact solution in Section III assumes infinitely sharp edges; softer edges introduce multiple edge modes (Ref. 57) not captured here.
domain assumption Entire perimeter is covered by electrodes; ungated regions are neglected.
The paper states this approximation in Section III.A; it requires plasmon delays in ungated regions to be negligible, justified only in the local capacitance limit.
domain assumption Semiclassical Drude model for conductivity (Eq. 3), with θH = arctan2(ωcτ, 1-iωτ).
The AC response and the counter-rotating resonances in Fig. 4 depend on this specific frequency dependence; other conductivity models could change the predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissipation in passive non-reciprocal microwave devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/63L6TMRT

@misc{pith2026250900874,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissipation in passive non-reciprocal microwave devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/63L6TMRT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00874}
}

read the original abstract

Non-reciprocal devices are key components in both classical and quantum electronics. One approach to realizing passive non-reciprocal microwave devices is through capacitive coupling between external electrodes and materials exhibiting non-reciprocal conductance. In this work, we develop an analytic framework that captures the response of such devices in the presence of dissipation while accounting for the full AC dynamics of the material. Our results yield an effective circuit model that accurately describes the device response in experimentally relevant regimes even at small dissipation levels. Furthermore, our analysis reveals counterpropagating features arising from the intrinsic AC response of the material that could be exploited to dynamically switch the non-reciprocity of the device, opening pathways for tunable non-reciprocal microwave technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00874 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Device and circuit model. (a) Sketch of a device comprising a non-reciprocal material capacitively coupled to external electrode of angular length L φ i with potential V¯i applied to a common ground. (b) The response of this device can be interpreted via a simple circuit model comprising an ideal circulator with characteristic impedance Zc coupled to lossy stubs, i.e., transmission lines terminated in open circui… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Reciprocal dissipative response. (a) Frequency dependence of Y2 for varying Hall angle. We show real and imaginary components with dashed and solid lines. In the quantum Hall regime θH = π/2 (black curves) the system has resonances at ω = ωR. These resonances are smoothed by dissipation, when the Hall angle decreases (blue curves), and are completely removed when θH = 0 (no Hall effect). (b) For small dissipation (… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Non-reciprocal dissipative response. We consider a device with three equal terminals impedance-matched with the external electrodes, i.e. Z0 = 1/2σ0. We operate this device as a two-port gyrator by grounding one electrode in (a) and as a three-port circulator in (b). We show relevant combinations of the scattering parameters as a function of ω. A finite Hall angle (solid curves) causes dissipation that decreases t… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Intrinsic AC response. We consider the response of a three-port dissipative circulator, and show relevant combinations of scattering parameters against frequency (ω/ω0 R) and magnetic field (ωcτ ∝ B). To capture the effect of an increasing magnetic field, the external …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[1]

In this case the material preserves time-reversal symmetry, and the response is fully reciprocal, such that the terminal ad- mittance matrix satisfies Yij = Yji

No Hall effect When θH = 0, the Hall effect is absent. In this case the material preserves time-reversal symmetry, and the response is fully reciprocal, such that the terminal ad- mittance matrix satisfies Yij = Yji. Although Eq. (14) can be evaluated directly at θH = 0, further insight can be gained by expanding the response at small frequencies ω <|ωR|....

work page
[2]

Quantum Hall limit An important regime of the terminal admittance ma- trix corresponds to the large magnetic field and low dis- sipation limit, defined by ω ≪ ωc and ωcτ → ∞. This regime mimics the quantum Hall effect, whereθH → π/2, the diagonal elements of the conductivity tensor vanish, 4 and the off-diagonal component reduces to σ0 = e2ν/h, with filli...

work page
[3]

(16a) admits a simple interpretation in terms of an effective circuit model, see Fig

Circuit model for small dissipation The lossless quantum Hall admittance matrix Yij in Eq. (16a) admits a simple interpretation in terms of an effective circuit model, see Fig. 1(b) [49, 51]. The device behaves as an ideal anticlockwise circulator with charac- teristic impedance Zc = 1 2σ0 , (17) and scattering matrix S⟲ =   0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0   , (18)...

work page
[4]

An ideal gyrator is a two-port device characterized by the scattering matrix SG = eiϕ 0 −1 1 0

Symmetric gyrator We first consider the gyrator [61]. An ideal gyrator is a two-port device characterized by the scattering matrix SG = eiϕ 0 −1 1 0 . (26) where ϕ is an arbitrary phase. Such a device can be implemented from our three- terminal Hall device simply by grounding one of the elec- trodes, e.g. electrode 3 [50]. Starting from the general termin...

work page
[5]

From the full three-dimensional terminal admittance matrix, the corresponding scatter- ing matrix can be obtained using Eq

Circulator We now consider the three-port circulator [40, 41, 46], which is directly realized in the three-terminal Hall device by measuring the potential at each terminal with respect to a common ground. From the full three-dimensional terminal admittance matrix, the corresponding scatter- ing matrix can be obtained using Eq. (27). As before, we focus on...

work page
[6]

Barzanjeh, A

S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, A. Al` u, S. A. Mann, N. Nefed- kin, V. Peano, and P. Rabl, Nonreciprocity in quantum technology, arXiv:2508.03945 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[7]

J. Zou, S. Bosco, E. Thingstad, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Dissipative spin-wave diode and nonreciprocal magnonic amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036701 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Y.-Y. Wang, S. van Geldern, T. Connolly, Y.-X. Wang, A. Shilcusky, A. McDonald, A. A. Clerk, and C. Wang, Low-loss ferrite circulator as a tunable chiral quantum system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064066 (2021)

work page 2021

Show all 68 references

[9]

K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nature Physics 13, 465 (2017)

2017
[10]

Barzanjeh, M

S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, Mechanical on- chip microwave circulator, Nature Communications 8, 953 (2017)

2017
[11]

Jiao, S.-D

Y.-F. Jiao, S.-D. Zhang, Y.-L. Zhang, A. Miranowicz, L.- M. Kuang, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal optomechanical entanglement against backscattering losses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 143605 (2020)

2020
[12]

Ahmadi, P

B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210402 (2024)

2024
[13]

F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Obser- vation of superconducting diode effect, Nature 584, 373 (2020)

2020
[14]

Nadeem, M

M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The super- conducting diode effect, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 558 (2023)

2023
[15]

Valentini, O

M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gi- jsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguil- era Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, T. Adletzberger, R. Seoane Souto, M. Leijnse, J. Danon, C. Schrade, E. Bakkers, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, Parity-conserving co...

2024
[16]

Ciaccia, R

C. Ciaccia, R. Haller, A. C. C. Drachmann, T. Linde- mann, M. J. Manfra, C. Schrade, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Gate-tunable josephson diode in proximitized inas su- percurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033131 (2023)

2023
[17]

Trahms, L

M. Trahms, L. Melischek, J. F. Steiner, B. Mahendru, I. Tamir, N. Bogdanoff, O. Peters, G. Reecht, C. B. Winkelmann, F. von Oppen, and K. J. Franke, Diode ef- fect in josephson junctions with a single magnetic atom, Nature 615, 628 (2023)

2023
[18]

Daido, Y

A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

2022
[19]

R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267702 (2022)

2022
[20]

Ili´ c and F

S. Ili´ c and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary dis- order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 177001 (2022)

2022
[21]

Navarathna, D

R. Navarathna, D. T. Le, A. R. Hamann, H. D. Nguyen, T. M. Stace, and A. Fedorov, Passive superconducting circulator on a chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 037001 (2023)

2023
[22]

D. T. Le, C. M¨ uller, R. Navarathna, A. Fedorov, and T. M. Stace, Operating a passive on-chip superconduct- 9 ing circulator: Device control and quasiparticle effects, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043211 (2021)

2021
[23]

N. P. Kumar, D. T. Le, P. Pakkiam, T. M. Stace, and A. Fedorov, Low-loss on-chip superconducting microwave circulator assisted by shunting capacitors, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013075 (2025)

2025
[24]

Riwar, M

R.-P. Riwar, M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer, and Y. V. Nazarov, Multi-terminal josephson junctions as topological matter, Nature Communications 7, 11167 (2016)

2016
[25]

Kashuba, R

O. Kashuba, R. Mummadavarapu, and R.-P. Riwar, Of gyrators and anyons, arXiv:2410.20835 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[26]

Ingla-Ayn´ es, Y

J. Ingla-Ayn´ es, Y. Hou, S. Wang, E.-D. Chu, O. A. Mukhanov, P. Wei, and J. S. Moodera, Efficient super- conducting diodes and rectifiers for quantum circuitry, Nature Electronics 8, 411 (2025)

2025
[27]

Castellani, O

M. Castellani, O. Medeiros, A. Buzzi, R. A. Foster, M. Colangelo, and K. K. Berggren, A superconduct- ing full-wave bridge rectifier, Nature Electronics 8, 417 (2025)

2025
[28]

Rymarz, S

M. Rymarz, S. Bosco, A. Ciani, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Hardware-encoding grid states in a nonreciprocal super- conducting circuit, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011032 (2021)

2021
[29]

Rymarz and D

M. Rymarz and D. P. DiVincenzo, Consistent quantiza- tion of nearly singular superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021017 (2023)

2023
[30]

Parra-Rodriguez, I

A. Parra-Rodriguez, I. L. Egusquiza, D. P. DiVincenzo, and E. Solano, Canonical circuit quantization with linear nonreciprocal devices, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014514 (2019)

2019
[31]

Parra-Rodriguez and I

A. Parra-Rodriguez and I. L. Egusquiza, Exact quanti- zation of nonreciprocal quasilumped electrical networks, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011072 (2025)

2025
[32]

Javed, D

M. Javed, D. Kruti, A. Kenawy, T. Herrig, C. Koliofoti, O. Kashuba, and R.-P. Riwar, Utilizing and extending superconducting circuit toolbox to simulate analog quan- tum gravity, arXiv:2406.01261 (2024)

2024
[33]

Bartolomei, R

H. Bartolomei, R. Bisognin, H. Kamata, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, G. M´ enard, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, P. Degiovanni, C. Mora, and G. F` eve, Observation of edge magnetoplasmon squeezing in a quantum hall conductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 106201 (2023)

2023
[34]

Bosco and D

S. Bosco and D. P. DiVincenzo, Transmission lines and resonators based on quantum hall plasmonics: Electro- magnetic field, attenuation, and coupling to qubits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035416 (2019)

2019
[35]

C. Lin, K. Futamata, T. Akiho, K. Muraki, and T. Fu- jisawa, Resonant plasmon-assisted tunneling in a double quantum dot coupled to a quantum hall plasmon res- onator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 036301 (2024)

2024
[36]

S. J. Elman, S. D. Bartlett, and A. C. Doherty, Long- range entanglement for spin qubits via quantum hall edge modes, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115407 (2017)

2017
[37]

Yang, C.-H

G. Yang, C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Long-distance entanglement of spin qubits via quantum hall edge states, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075301 (2016)

2016
[38]

Arute, K

F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin,...

2019
[39]

Fay and R

C. Fay and R. Comstock, Operation of the ferrite junc- tion circulator, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 13, 15 (1965)

1965
[40]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

2015
[41]

Metelmann and H

A. Metelmann and H. E. T¨ ureci, Nonreciprocal signal routing in an active quantum network, Phys. Rev. A 97, 043833 (2018)

2018
[42]

E. I. Rosenthal, B. J. Chapman, A. P. Higginbotham, J. Kerckhoff, and K. W. Lehnert, Breaking lorentz reci- procity with frequency conversion and delay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 147703 (2017)

2017
[43]

B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, J. Kerckhoff, B. A. Moores, L. R. Vale, J. A. B. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. La- lumi` ere, A. Blais, and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable on-chip microwave circulator for superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041043 (2017)

2017
[44]

B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, and K. W. Lehnert, Design of an on-chip superconducting microwave circula- tor with octave bandwidth, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044048 (2019)

2019
[45]

Viola and D

G. Viola and D. P. DiVincenzo, Hall effect gyrators and circulators, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021019 (2014)

2014
[46]

A. C. Mahoney, J. I. Colless, S. J. Pauka, J. M. Horni- brook, J. D. Watson, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, A. C. Doherty, and D. J. Reilly, On-chip microwave quantum hall circulator, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011007 (2017)

2017
[47]

Petkovi´ c, F

I. Petkovi´ c, F. I. B. Williams, K. Bennaceur, F. Portier, P. Roche, and D. C. Glattli, Carrier drift velocity and edge magnetoplasmons in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 016801 (2013)

2013
[48]

Kumada, S

N. Kumada, S. Tanabe, H. Hibino, H. Kamata, M. Hashisaka, K. Muraki, and T. Fujisawa, Plasmon transport in graphene investigated by time-resolved elec- trical measurements, Nature Communications 4, 1363 (2013)

2013
[49]

Tarascio and et al., Self-matched quantum hall gyra- tor, in preparation (2025)

A. Tarascio and et al., Self-matched quantum hall gyra- tor, in preparation (2025)

2025
[50]

A. C. Mahoney, J. I. Colless, L. Peeters, S. J. Pauka, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, D. Goldhaber- Gordon, and D. J. Reilly, Zero-field edge plasmons in a magnetic topological insulator, Nature Communications 8, 1836 (2017)

2017
[51]

L. A. Martinez, N. Du, N. Materise, S. O. Kelley, X. Wu, G. Qiu, K. L. Wang, P. Gianpaolo, T. Low, and D.-X. Qu, Circulators based on coupled quantum anomalous hall insulators and resonators, arXiv:2505.07770 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[52]

Gourmelon, E

A. Gourmelon, E. Frigerio, H. Kamata, L. Lunczer, A. Denis, P. Morfin, M. Rosticher, J.-M. Berroir, G. F` eve, B. Pla¸ cais, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, and E. Boc- quillon, Velocity and confinement of edge plasmons in hgte-based two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. ...

2023
[53]

R¨ oper, H

T. R¨ oper, H. Thomas, D. Rosenbach, A. Uday, G. Lip- pertz, A. Denis, P. Morfin, A. A. Taskin, Y. Ando, and E. Bocquillon, Propagation, dissipation, and break- down in quantum anomalous hall edge states probed by microwave edge plasmons, Phys. Rev. B 110, L161403 (2024)

2024
[54]

Bosco, D

S. Bosco, D. DiVincenzo, and D. Reilly, Transmission lines and metamaterials based on quantum hall plasmon- ics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014030 (2019)

2019
[55]

Bosco, F

S. Bosco, F. Haupt, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Self- impedance-matched hall-effect gyrators and circulators, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 024030 (2017)

2017
[56]

Bosco, Quantum hall plasmonics for quantum compu- tation, PhD Thesis 10.18154/R WTH-2019-09498 (2019)

S. Bosco, Quantum hall plasmonics for quantum compu- tation, PhD Thesis 10.18154/R WTH-2019-09498 (2019)

2019 doi
[57]

A. L. Fetter, Edge magnetoplasmons in a bounded two- dimensional electron fluid, Phys. Rev. B 32, 7676 (1985)

1985
[58]

Bosco and D

S. Bosco and D. P. DiVincenzo, Nonreciprocal quantum hall devices with driven edge magnetoplasmons in two- dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195317 (2017)

2017
[59]

S. M. Girvin, The quantum hall effect: Novel excita- tions and broken symmetries, in Aspects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension. Topological aspects of low dimensional systems: Session LXIX. 7–31 July 1998 (Springer, 2002) pp. 53–175

1998
[60]

Chang, C.-X

C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Collo- quium: Quantum anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

2023
[61]

Volkov and S

V. Volkov and S. A. Mikhailov, Theory of edge magneto- plasmons in a two-dimensional electron gas, JETP Lett 42 (1985)

1985
[62]

I. L. Aleiner and L. I. Glazman, Novel edge excitations of two-dimensional electron liquid in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2935 (1994)

1994
[63]

M. D. Johnson and G. Vignale, Dynamics of dissipative quantum hall edges, Phys. Rev. B 67, 205332 (2003)

2003
[64]

D. B. Chklovskii, B. I. Shklovskii, and L. I. Glazman, Electrostatics of edge channels, Phys. Rev. B 46, 4026 (1992)

1992
[65]

C. d. C. Chamon and X. G. Wen, Sharp and smooth boundaries of quantum hall liquids, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8227 (1994)

1994
[66]

B. D. Tellegen, The gyrator, a new electric network ele- ment, Philips Res. Rep 3, 81 (1948)

1948
[67]

D. M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, Fourth Editions, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, John Wiley & Sons, Inc (2012)

2012
[68]

Placke, S

B. Placke, S. Bosco, and D. P. DiVincenzo, A model study of present-day hall-effect circulators, EPJ Quan- tum Technology 4, 5 (2017)

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

In this case the material preserves time-reversal symmetry, and the response is fully reciprocal, such that the terminal ad- mittance matrix satisfies Yij = Yji

No Hall effect When θH = 0, the Hall effect is absent. In this case the material preserves time-reversal symmetry, and the response is fully reciprocal, such that the terminal ad- mittance matrix satisfies Yij = Yji. Although Eq. (14) can be evaluated directly at θH = 0, further insight can be gained by expanding the response at small frequencies ω <|ωR|....

work page

[2] [2]

Quantum Hall limit An important regime of the terminal admittance ma- trix corresponds to the large magnetic field and low dis- sipation limit, defined by ω ≪ ωc and ωcτ → ∞. This regime mimics the quantum Hall effect, whereθH → π/2, the diagonal elements of the conductivity tensor vanish, 4 and the off-diagonal component reduces to σ0 = e2ν/h, with filli...

work page

[3] [3]

(16a) admits a simple interpretation in terms of an effective circuit model, see Fig

Circuit model for small dissipation The lossless quantum Hall admittance matrix Yij in Eq. (16a) admits a simple interpretation in terms of an effective circuit model, see Fig. 1(b) [49, 51]. The device behaves as an ideal anticlockwise circulator with charac- teristic impedance Zc = 1 2σ0 , (17) and scattering matrix S⟲ =   0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0   , (18)...

work page

[4] [4]

An ideal gyrator is a two-port device characterized by the scattering matrix SG = eiϕ 0 −1 1 0

Symmetric gyrator We first consider the gyrator [61]. An ideal gyrator is a two-port device characterized by the scattering matrix SG = eiϕ 0 −1 1 0 . (26) where ϕ is an arbitrary phase. Such a device can be implemented from our three- terminal Hall device simply by grounding one of the elec- trodes, e.g. electrode 3 [50]. Starting from the general termin...

work page

[5] [5]

From the full three-dimensional terminal admittance matrix, the corresponding scatter- ing matrix can be obtained using Eq

Circulator We now consider the three-port circulator [40, 41, 46], which is directly realized in the three-terminal Hall device by measuring the potential at each terminal with respect to a common ground. From the full three-dimensional terminal admittance matrix, the corresponding scatter- ing matrix can be obtained using Eq. (27). As before, we focus on...

work page

[6] [6]

Barzanjeh, A

S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, A. Al` u, S. A. Mann, N. Nefed- kin, V. Peano, and P. Rabl, Nonreciprocity in quantum technology, arXiv:2508.03945 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[7] [7]

J. Zou, S. Bosco, E. Thingstad, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Dissipative spin-wave diode and nonreciprocal magnonic amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036701 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Y.-Y. Wang, S. van Geldern, T. Connolly, Y.-X. Wang, A. Shilcusky, A. McDonald, A. A. Clerk, and C. Wang, Low-loss ferrite circulator as a tunable chiral quantum system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064066 (2021)

work page 2021