Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Movable antennas at the base station can keep near-field MIMO secure even when the eavesdropper sits in the same direction as the user and closer to the base station.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Movable antenna positions and hybrid beamformers are jointly optimized to maximize secrecy rate in near-field MIMO, achieving secure transmission when the eavesdropper is in the same direction and closer to the base station.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Interesting MA/near-field PLS setup, but a sign error in the MA position update breaks the claimed algorithm and convergence. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.00901 v1 pith:QFRTEOFE submitted 2025-08-31 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Movable Antenna Empowered Secure Near-Field MIMO Communications

Yaodong Ma , Kai Liu , Yanming Liu , Lipeng Zhu This is my paper
classification cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords movable antennanear-field communicationsphysical layer securityhybrid beamformingbeam focusingsecrecy ratemajorization-minimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In near-field wireless links, electromagnetic waves are spherical rather than planar, so a base station can focus energy at a specific distance as well as a specific angle. This paper asks whether that distance-domain resolution can protect a confidential transmission from an eavesdropper positioned along the same azimuth as the legitimate user—a scenario where angular-only beam steering fails entirely. The authors claim it can, provided the base station's antennas are movable and their positions are jointly optimized with the hybrid digital/analog beamformer. Their alternating-optimization algorithm—WMMSE for the fully-digital beamformer, manifold optimization for the hybrid decomposition, and majorization-minimization for antenna positions—yields positive secrecy rate in simulations across the full range of eavesdropper distances, including placements between the base station and the user. The result matters because it offers a hardware-efficient physical-layer security route in the near-field regime without requiring large fixed arrays.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a base station equipped with a movable-antenna array can achieve a positive secrecy rate in near-field MIMO even when the eavesdropper is located at the same azimuth angle as the legitimate user and is closer to the base station. The reason is that the near-field spherical-wave channel distinguishes receivers by distance as well as angle, and re-positioning the antennas reshapes the near-field response vectors to concentrate power at the user's location while suppressing leakage to the eavesdropper. The authors demonstrate the claim by solving the secrecy-rate maximization problem—jointly over the hybrid analog/digital beamformers and the antenna positions—w

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the near-field response vector (NFRV), whose spherical-wave phase depends on the distance between each movable antenna and each receive antenna; moving a single antenna changes the entire channel matrix. The optimization machinery is a three-block alternating procedure: a WMMSE-based update gives the fully-digital beamformer in semi-closed form, manifold optimization approximates it by analog (unit-modulus) and baseband digital beamformers, and a majorization-minimization step with a convex surrogate updates each antenna's position under spacing and region constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The base station has perfect knowledge of the eavesdropper's channel at every step of the optimization.

What would settle it

Run the same joint design but with the eavesdropper's near-field channel Z(t) estimated from uplink pilots with realistic noise (e.g., 5 dB SNR) instead of genie-aided CSI; if the secrecy rate for an eavesdropper at (10 m, π/4) with the user at (15 m, π/4) drops to zero while far-field beam steering also fails, the claimed same-direction security rests entirely on perfect CSI and would not survive estimation error.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Positive secrecy rate is achievable with the eavesdropper aligned with the user and closer to the BS, something far-field beam steering cannot provide.
  • The proposed hybrid beamformer closely approaches the fully-digital secrecy-rate upper bound, so fewer RF chains suffice for secure near-field MIMO.
  • Enlarging the antenna moving region (aperture) raises secrecy rate more than increasing transmit power, indicating that spatial degrees of freedom are the dominant resource.
  • Secrecy rate grows with the number of movable antennas at the BS, widening the gap over fixed-position arrays.
  • Reducing the moving region widens the beam main lobe and increases leakage to the eavesdropper, so aperture size directly controls security in near-field MA systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same distance-domain focusing works as claimed, it suggests a general design principle: in near-field MIMO, physical-layer security can be decoupled from angular separation, opening a range axis available only when the array aperture pushes the Rayleigh distance beyond the serving range.
  • The perfect-eavesdropper-CSI assumption is the obvious practical bottleneck; an extension with imperfect or statistical CSI—even one targeting secrecy outage instead of rate—would reveal how much of the claimed gain survives estimation error.
  • The beam-focusing heatmaps imply a dual use: the same MA-position optimization could serve near-field localization or secure wireless power transfer, where distance selectivity is exactly what is wanted.
  • Since the algorithm is an alternating local method, its practical relevance depends on convergence to good local optima; a sensitivity study over random initializations would reveal whether the reported gains are robust or initialization-dependent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper considers a movable-antenna (MA) base station serving a legitimate user while an eavesdropper, located in the same azimuth direction and closer to the BS, tries to intercept the transmission. The authors formulate a secrecy-rate maximization problem that jointly optimizes hybrid beamformers and MA positions under near-field spherical-wave assumptions. They propose an alternating-optimization algorithm: a WMMSE-based semi-closed-form update for the fully-digital beamformer, a manifold-optimization step to approximate it by a hybrid beamformer, and an MM-based update for each MA position. Simulation results are reported for secrecy rate versus various system parameters, and the central claim is that the proposed scheme realizes positive secrecy even when the eavesdropper is in the same direction as the user and closer to the BS.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would provide a useful extension of physical-layer security to MA-aided near-field MIMO, explicitly exploiting the distance domain in addition to the angle domain. The WMMSE reformulation of the fully-digital secrecy-rate problem is standard and the hybrid beamforming via manifold optimization follows established practice. The paper also includes a reasonable set of benchmarks and Monte-Carlo simulations, and it frames the perfect-CSI assumption as an upper-bound study. However, the load-bearing derivation for the MA-position update contains a sign error that breaks the equivalence between the optimized objective and the secrecy rate; consequently, the claimed beam-focusing gains and the simulation conclusions are not supported by the equations as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [III-B, Eq. (33)] The claimed simplification of the secrecy rate f3(t) in (32a) to (33) is algebraically false. For the scalar case H=1, Z=0, V=1, (32a) gives f3 = log2(2) - log2(1) = 1 bit. With P=(1+1)^{-1}=0.5, Q_U=E(P,V)^{-1}=2 from (12)-(14), the right-hand side of (33) equals -2 Tr(Q_U V^H H^H P) - Tr(V^H H^H P Q_U P^H H V) = -2 - 0.5 = -2.5. Thus (33) is not the secrecy rate. Since f4 in (38) is derived from (33) and the MM surrogate in Lemma 1 and (46) is built on f4, Algorithm 2 optimizes an objective that is not equivalent to (32a). The position update therefore does not implement the claimed beam-focusing maximization, and the secrecy-rate gains in Section IV are not reproducible from the paper's equations.
  2. [III-C1, convergence analysis] The claim that Algorithm 3 'guarantees that (8a) does not decrease over iterations' is not established. Stage II solves (21), which minimizes the Frobenius norm ||W - W_A W_D||_F; a better Frobenius fit of the fully-digital beamformer does not imply a larger secrecy rate, so R can decrease from the fully-digital benchmark step. Moreover, the MA update in Section III-B is not a valid MM step for (8a) because of the incorrect objective in (33). The convergence plot in Fig. 2 is empirical and cannot compensate for the missing monotonicity proof. The authors should either provide a valid surrogate that is monotone in the true secrecy rate or explicitly state that the algorithm is a heuristic with only empirical convergence.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (58)-(59)] The Hessian expressions in (59) are incomplete and also contain an incorrect amplitude factor. From (56), f5(t_m)=2∑ ρ cos(φ), so the second derivative contains a term - (4π/λ)∑ ρ sin(φ) ∂²γ/∂y_m² in addition to the - (8π²/λ²)∑ ρ cos(φ)(∂γ/∂y_m)² term; (59a) omits the former and squares the amplitude ρ instead of keeping ρ. Since δ_m in (46) is intended to satisfy δ_m I ⪰ ∇² f5, the printed expressions do not provide a valid majorizing surrogate. This further undermines the MM position update, even after correcting the earlier sign error.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 1 statement] The equivalence in Theorem 1 is stated for 'the secrecy rate maximization problem in (8)', but (11) does not include the MA positions or the hybrid constraints. The statement should be restricted to the fully-digital subproblem (10) for fixed t.
  2. [Eq. (35)] The phrase 'denote b_i as the m-th column of i-th column of B' is garbled. It should read: let b_m denote the m-th column of B.
  3. [Section III-C2] The complexity paragraph introduces t1,max and t2,max for 'steps 2-8' and 'problem (48)', but the notation is inconsistent with the earlier definitions of t1,max, t2,max, t3,max, t4,max. Please clarify which index refers to which loop.
  4. [Section IV-A] For the far-field benchmark (FF), it should be clearly stated whether the MA positions in this scheme are optimized under the far-field model and then evaluated under the near-field model, or whether a fixed FPA is used; the current description is ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No meaningful circularity: the paper directly maximizes the secrecy rate via standard WMMSE/MM methods; the only self-citation is a non-load-bearing step-size detail.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict, or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The central optimization (Problem (8)) maximizes the actual secrecy rate R=[RU-RE]^+, and the WMMSE reformulation in Theorem 1 is a standard exact equivalence (Appendix A uses the known identity -log det(E) = max_Q [log det(Q)-Tr(QE)+a]), not a fitting step. The hybrid beamformer is obtained by approximating the fully-digital beamformer, and the MA positions are updated via an MM surrogate; neither introduces data-derived parameters that are then reported as predictions. The simulation section compares the proposed scheme to RPA/FPA/far-field baselines under the same near-field channel model, so the reported gains are externally falsifiable simulation results rather than an artifact of fitting. The only self-citation is in Sec. III-B near Eq. (46): 'the construction of δm can be constructed as in [11]', where [11] is the authors' own arXiv:2410.03426. This is an implementation detail for a step-size parameter in the Taylor surrogate; the MM upper-bound property only requires δm I2 ⪰ ∇² f5, whose existence is independent of [11], so the central claim does not reduce to the self-citation. Lemma 1's proof is delegated to external reference [55], not a self-citation. The skeptic's concern about a possible sign inconsistency in Eq. (33)/(38) is a mathematical-correctness issue, not a circularity issue: even if the MA update were derived from the wrong objective, that would invalidate the algorithm's claim without making the argument circular. Similarly, the perfect-eavesdropper-CSI assumption is an explicit upper-bound assumption, not a circular one. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained for circularity purposes, with only one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several modeling and algorithmic assumptions: the WMMSE identity, the LoS near-field model with position-independent path gains, the Fresnel approximation used to derive the MM surrogate, perfect CSI, and an unproved monotonicity property of the MM surrogate chain. No fitted parameters are introduced; all simulation parameters are fixed system settings rather than data-fitted constants.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Identities in Appendix A: log det(I+XY)=log det(I+YX) and the variational form -log det(E) = max_Q log det(Q) - Tr(QE) + a
    Used to prove Theorem 1 and transform the secrecy rate into the WMMSE form in (11).
  • domain assumption LoS near-field channel model with position-independent path coefficients g_l,m (Section II-A)
    In (2), the amplitude g_l,m does not vary with the MA position t_m, so antenna movement changes only the phase. This enables the simplification in (43) but ignores amplitude variations across a 100 lambda aperture.
  • domain assumption Fresnel (parabolic) approximation of the spherical distance in (57)
    Appendix B uses it to derive the gradients and Hessians for the MM surrogate in (46). The approximation error is not quantified and could affect the majorization property.
  • domain assumption Perfect CSI of user and eavesdropper at the BS
    Stated in Section II-A. The beamformer and MA position updates require exact Z(t), which is unrealistic in practice but gives an upper bound.
  • ad hoc to paper The MM surrogate f5 is a valid upper bound that drives f4 downward
    Lemma 1 gives f4 <= f5, but f5(x_t) > f4(x_t) in general, so standard MM monotonicity of f4 is not guaranteed. The paper implicitly assumes this in the convergence analysis.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Movable Antenna Empowered Secure Near-Field MIMO Communications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QFRTEOFE

@misc{pith2026250900901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Movable Antenna Empowered Secure Near-Field MIMO Communications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QFRTEOFE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00901}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper investigates movable antenna (MA) empowered secure transmission in near-field multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems, where the base station (BS) equipped with an MA array transmits confidential information to a legitimate user under the threat of a potential eavesdropper. To enhance physical layer security (PLS) of the considered system, we aim to maximize the secrecy rate by jointly designing the hybrid digital and analog beamformers, as well as the positions of MAs at the BS. To solve the formulated non-convex problem with highly coupled variables, an alternating optimization (AO)-based algorithm is introduced by decoupling the original problem into two separate subproblems. Specifically, for the subproblem of designing hybrid beamformers, a semi-closed-form solution for the fully-digital beamformer is first derived by a weighted minimum mean-square error (WMMSE)-based algorithm. Subsequently, the digital and analog beamformers are determined by approximating the fully-digital beamformer through the manifold optimization (MO) technique. For the MA positions design subproblem, we utilize the majorization-minimization (MM) algorithm to iteratively optimize each MA's position while keeping others fixed. Extensive simulation results validate the considerable benefits of the proposed MA-aided near-field beam focusing approach in enhancing security performance compared to the traditional far-field and/or the fixed position antenna (FPA)-based systems. In addition, the proposed scheme can realize secure transmission even if the eavesdropper is located in the same direction as the user and closer to the BS.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00901 by Kai Liu, Lipeng Zhu, Yanming Liu, Yaodong Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the MA-aided near-field MIMO communi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The convergence behavior of Algorithm 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized heat-maps for beam focus￾ing when A = 10λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Secrecy rate versus distance between the BS and eaves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Secrecy rate versus the azimuth angle of the eavesdro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Secrecy rate versus transmit power budget [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Secrecy rate versus the number of transmit antenna [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Security and privacy for 6G: A survey on prospective techno logies and challenges,

    V .-L. Nguyen, P .-C. Lin, B.-C. Cheng, R.-H. Hwang, and Y . -D. Lin, “Security and privacy for 6G: A survey on prospective techno logies and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2384– 2428, 4th Quat. 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    A survey of optimizat ion approaches for wireless physical layer security,

    D. Wang, B. Bai, W. Zhao, and Z. Han, “A survey of optimizat ion approaches for wireless physical layer security,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1878–1911, 2nd Quat. 2018

    work page 1911

  3. [3]

    Jamming-assisted wireless in formation surveillance with movable antenna,

    J. Liao, F. Zhu, and G. Hu, “Jamming-assisted wireless in formation surveillance with movable antenna,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2739–2743, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Secur e full- duplex communication via movable antennas,

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, C. Wang, W. Li, L. Lin, and B. Jiao, “Secur e full- duplex communication via movable antennas,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access, Mar. 2025, doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3520806

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    On the secre cy capacity of MIMO wiretap channels: Convex reformulation and efficient n umerical methods,

    A. Mukherjee, B. Ottersten, and L.-N. Tran, “On the secre cy capacity of MIMO wiretap channels: Convex reformulation and efficient n umerical methods,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6865– 6878, Oct. 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Secure beamform ing for MIMO broadcasting with wireless information and power t ransfer,

    Q. Shi, W. Xu, J. Wu, E. Song, and Y . Wang, “Secure beamform ing for MIMO broadcasting with wireless information and power t ransfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2841–2853, May 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    A deep learning framework for physical-layer secure beamfor ming,

    Z. Song, Y . Lu, X. Chen, B. Ai, Z. Zhong, and D. Niyato, “A deep learning framework for physical-layer secure beamfor ming,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 19 844–19 849, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Ne ar- field communications: A tutorial review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “Ne ar- field communications: A tutorial review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., , vol. 4, pp. 1999–2049, Aug. 2023

    1999

  9. [9]

    Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Imani , and Y . C. Eldar, “Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7476–7490, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Near-field rai nbow: Wideband beam training for XL-MIMO,

    M. Cui, L. Dai, Z. Wang, S. Zhou, and N. Ge, “Near-field rai nbow: Wideband beam training for XL-MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 3899–3912, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Movable-Antenna Aided Secure Transmission for RIS-ISAC Systems

    Y . Ma, K. Liu, Y . Liu, L. Zhu, and Z. Xiao, “Movable-anten na aided secure transmission for RIS-ISAC systems,” arXiv:2410.03426, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Secure MIM O communication relying on movable antennas,

    J. Tang, C. Pan, Y . Zhang, H. Ren, and K. Wang, “Secure MIM O communication relying on movable antennas,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access, Sep. 2024, doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3465369

    arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Enhancing secure MIMO transmis sion via intelligent reflecting surface,

    L. Dong and H.-M. Wang, “Enhancing secure MIMO transmis sion via intelligent reflecting surface,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 7543–7556, Nov. 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Performance an alysis of physical layer security: From far-field to near-field,

    B. Zhao, C. Ouyang, X. Zhang, and Y . Liu, “Performance an alysis of physical layer security: From far-field to near-field,” arXiv:2408.10706,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Nea r-field wideband secure communications: An analog beamfocusing ap proach,

    Y . Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Xiao, W. Tang, and Y . C. Eldar, “Nea r-field wideband secure communications: An analog beamfocusing ap proach,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 72, pp. 2173–2187, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Physical la yer security in near-field communications,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, and J. Chen, “Physical la yer security in near-field communications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 10 761–10 766, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Movable antennas for wirele ss commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wirele ss commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless net- works,

    L. Zhu et al. , “A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless net- works,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , early access, Feb. 2025, doi:10.1109/COMST.2025.3546373

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Historical review of fluid antenn a and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K.-K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenn a and movable antenna,” arXiv:2401.02362, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02362

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Modeling and performance an alysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance an alysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    MIMO capacity characteriza tion for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characteriza tion for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Performance analys is and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communica tions,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Performance analys is and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communica tions,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 653–18 668, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Movable-a ntenna po- sition optimization: A graph-based approach,

    W. Mei, X. Wei, B. Ning, Z. Chen, and R. Zhang, “Movable-a ntenna po- sition optimization: A graph-based approach,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1853–1857, Jul. 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Channel estimation for movable antenna com- munication systems: A framework based on compressed sens- ing,

    Z. Xiao et al. , “Channel estimation for movable antenna com- munication systems: A framework based on compressed sens- ing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , early access, Sep. 2024, doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3385110

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    6D movable antenna base d on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna base d on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 355–370, Jan. 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    6DMA enhanced wireless network wi th flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challeng es,

    X. Shao and R. Zhang, “6DMA enhanced wireless network wi th flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challeng es,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 121–128, Apr. 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    6D movable a ntenna enhanced wireless network via discrete position and rotati on optimiza- tion,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and R. Schober, “6D movable a ntenna enhanced wireless network via discrete position and rotati on optimiza- tion,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 674–687, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Movable-antenna array enha nced beam- forming: Achieving full array gain with null steering,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna array enha nced beam- forming: Achieving full array gain with null steering,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3340–3344, Dec. 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Multiuse r commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenn a positioning, receive combining, and power control,

    Z. Xiao, X. Pi, L. Zhu, X.-G. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Multiuse r commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenn a positioning, receive combining, and power control,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access, Dec. 2024, doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3486320

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Y . Zhou, W. Chen, Q. Wu, X. Zhu, and N. Cheng, “Movable ant enna empowered downlink NOMA systems: Power allocation and ante nna 13 ∂f5(tm) ∂ym =− 4π λ ( LU∑ i=1 ̺U m,i sin ( ϕU m,i ) ∂γ U (tm) ∂ym + LE∑ j=1 ̺E m,j sin ( ϕE m,j ) ∂γ E(tm) ∂ym ) , (58a) ∂γ I (tm) ∂ym = ( ym− ( ym sin θI l sin φI l + zm cos φI l ) sin θI l sin φI l rI l − sin θi l sin φI l ...

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Flexible Beamforming for Movable Antenna-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication

    W. Lyu, S. Y ang, Y . Xiu, Z. Zhang, C. Assi, and C. Y uen, “Flexible beamforming for movable antenna-enabled integr ated sensing and communication,” arXiv:2405.10507, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10507

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Dynamic beam c overage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna arr ay,

    L. Zhu, X. Pi, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Dynamic beam c overage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna arr ay,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1916–1933, Mar. 2025

    work page 1916

  33. [33]

    Movable antenna enhanced wi reless sensing via antenna position optimization,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Movable antenna enhanced wi reless sensing via antenna position optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., early access, Nov. 2024, doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3443293

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Secure wirel ess communication via movable-antenna array,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, K. Xu, J. Si, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Secure wirel ess communication via movable-antenna array,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 31, pp. 516–520, Jan. 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Secure ana log beamforming design for wireless communication systems wit h movable antennas,

    W. Xiong, K. Zhong, Z. Xiao, J. Lin, and Q. Li, “Secure ana log beamforming design for wireless communication systems wit h movable antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India, Apr. 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Movable antennas-assisted secure transmission with- out eavesdroppers’ instantaneous CSI,

    G. Hu et al. , “Movable antennas-assisted secure transmission with- out eavesdroppers’ instantaneous CSI,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 14 263–14 279, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Movable Antenna Empowered Physical Layer Security Without Eve's CSI: Joint Optimization of Beamforming and Antenna Positions

    Z. Feng, Y . Zhao, K. Y u, and D. Li, “Movable antenna empow ered physical layer security without eve’s CSI: Joint optimizat ion of beamforming and antenna positions,” arXiv:2405.16062, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Movable antenna aide d physical layer security with no eavesdropper CSI,

    Z. Cheng, C. Ouyang, and X. Zhang, “Movable antenna aide d physical layer security with no eavesdropper CSI,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India, Apr. 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Movable-antenn a enabled covert communication,

    P . Liu, J. Si, Z. Cheng, Z. Li, and H. Hu, “Movable-antenn a enabled covert communication,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 280–284, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Movable Antenna Array Aided Ultra Reliable Covert Communications

    Y . Wang, G. Hu, X. Hu, X. Lu, and Y . Huang, “Movable antenn a array aided ultra reliable covert communications,” arXiv:2412.20417, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20417

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Movable antenna-assisted covert communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    W. Xie et al. , “Movable antenna-assisted covert communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Internet Things J. , early ac- cess, Dec. 2024, doi:10.1109/JIOT.2024.3520710

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Movable Frequency Diverse Array-Assisted Covert Communication With Multiple Wardens

    Z. Cheng, J. Si, Z. Li, P . Liu, X. Wang, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Movable frequency diverse array-assisted covert communi cation with multiple wardens,” arXiv:2407.20280, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20280

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Movable antenna en- abled near-field communications: Channel modeling and perf ormance optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Movable antenna en- abled near-field communications: Channel modeling and perf ormance optimization,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access, Mar. 2025, doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2025.3547783

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Near-fiel d multiuser communications aided by movable antennas,

    J. Ding, L. Zhu, Z. Zhou, B. Jiao, and R. Zhang, “Near-fiel d multiuser communications aided by movable antennas,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 138–142, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Antenna Position Optimization for Movable Antenna-Empowered Near-Field Sensing

    Y . Wang, W. Mei, X. Wei, B. Ning, and Z. Chen, “Antenna pos ition optimization for movable antenna-empowered near-field sen sing,” arXiv:2502.03169, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502 . 03169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Movable Antenna-Aided Near-Field Integrated Sensing and Communication

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, X. Shao, B. Jiao, and R. Zhang, “Movable antenna-aided near-field integrated sensing and communica tion,” arXiv:2412.19470, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412 . 19470

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Suppressing Beam Squint Effect For Near-Field Wideband Communication Through Movable Antennas

    Y . Zhu, Q. Wu, Y . Liu, Q. Shi, and W. Chen, “Suppressing beam squint effect for near-field wideband communication th rough movable antennas,” arXiv:2407.19511, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19511

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Alternat ing minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO sys tems,

    X. Y u, J.-C. Shen, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Alternat ing minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO sys tems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 485–500, Apr. 2016

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Hybrid digital and analog beamfor ming design for large-scale antenna arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Y u, “Hybrid digital and analog beamfor ming design for large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 501–513, Apr. 2016

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Channel estimation for extremely lar ge-scale MIMO: Far-field or near-field?

    M. Cui and L. Dai, “Channel estimation for extremely lar ge-scale MIMO: Far-field or near-field?” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2663–2677, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Near-field channel estimation in mixed LoS/NLoS environments for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,

    Y . Lu and L. Dai, “Near-field channel estimation in mixed LoS/NLoS environments for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 3694–3707, Jun. 2023

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    A riemannian manifold approach to constrained resource al loca- tion in ISAC,

    S. Zargari, D. Galappaththige, C. Tellambura, and H. V . Poor, “A riemannian manifold approach to constrained resource al loca- tion in ISAC,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access, Oct. 2024, doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3487801

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Intelligent reflecting surface aided MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer,

    C. Pan et al. , “Intelligent reflecting surface aided MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer, ” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1719–1734, Aug. 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Transmit MI MO radar beampattern design via optimization on the complex circle m anifold,

    K. Alhujaili, V . Monga, and M. Rangaswamy, “Transmit MI MO radar beampattern design via optimization on the complex circle m anifold,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 3561–3575, Jul. 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Optimization metho ds for designing sequences with low autocorrelation sidelobes,

    J. Song, P . Babu, and D. P . Palomar, “Optimization metho ds for designing sequences with low autocorrelation sidelobes,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 3998–4009, Aug. 2015

    work page 2015

  56. [2024]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408. 10706

    work page

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.