Properties of the magnetic universe with positive cosmological constant

Ethan Quanrun Wu; Yen-Kheng Lim; Yun-Ten Chin; Yu-Xuan Toh

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Properties of the magnetic universe with positive cosmological constant

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a positive cosmological constant, the Melvin magnetic universe becomes a compact, conical two-sphere over flat spacetime, with a round Freund-Rubin sphere as a critical limit.

desk verdict Solid qualitative analysis of the Lambda>0 Melvin regime; the one weak section is the Freund–Rubin limit, which needs a real derivation but is not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01374 v1 pith:JBNDCBIC submitted 2025-09-01 gr-qc hep-th

Yu-Xuan Toh , Yun-Ten Chin , Ethan Quanrun Wu , Yen-Kheng Lim This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C1583C2283E15 PACS 04.20.Jb04.40.Nr

keywords MelvinuniversepositivecosmologicalconstantEinstein-MaxwellgravityconicalsingularityfluxcompactificationFreund-Rubingeodesicshigherdimensions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the geometry of the Melvin magnetic universe—a bundle of magnetic field lines held in equilibrium by its own gravity—when a positive cosmological constant is added in d-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell gravity. The central result is that the spacetime is a warped product of (d-2)-dimensional Minkowski space with a compact two-sphere: the radial direction is squeezed between two roots of the metric function, so the cross-section can no longer extend to arbitrarily large size. The sphere carries a conical singularity at one pole, with a deficit when the magnetic parameter times the de Sitter radius is above a critical value, an excess when below, and a round sphere exactly at the critical value. In that critical limit the solution becomes a Freund-Rubin flux compactification with the Maxwell field providing a two-form flux over the two extra dimensions. The paper also computes the flux distribution and geodesic motion, which are bounded because of the compact sphere.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the metric function f(r) = ν/rd−3 − r2/ℓ2 − β2/r2(d−3) and its two positive roots λ and r0. The interval between the roots is the compact r-direction, and the combination βℓ compared with the critical value η = √[(d−1)/(d−3)] λd−2 decides whether the conical singularity at r0 is a deficit or an excess. The Freund-Rubin limit is obtained by the simultaneous scaling r = λε(x+b), r0 = λ + 2εb, ψ = (b/ε)φ, which sends the interval to a round sphere while keeping the flux finite. The solution itself is obtained by a double Wick rotation of the planar charged black hole, which is why f(r) appears in a Reissner-Nordström-like form.

What would settle it

Compute the constant C from the factorization P(r) and test whether b2C = λ^{2(d−3)} admits a positive real b; then substitute the ε→0 limiting metric and gauge potential into the Einstein-Maxwell equations. If the limiting fields do not satisfy the equations, or if no such b exists, the Freund-Rubin limit claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the coordinates used here, the metric takes the form ds2 = (r2/λ2)ηab dxa dxb + dr2/f(r) + f(r)dψ2, with f(r) = ν/rd−3 − r2/ℓ2 − β2/r2(d−3) and ℓ2 = (d−1)(d−2)/(2Λ). Choosing ν so that r = λ is a root, the Lorentzian region lies between two positive roots λ and r0; hence the (r,ψ) section is a topological sphere, not an infinite cylinder. After fixing the ψ periodicity to remove the conical singularity at r = λ, the other pole has conical deficit if βℓ > √[(d−1)/(d−3)] λd−2 and conical excess if βℓ is below that value. Taking r0 → λ while rescaling r and ψ yields R^{1,d−3} × S2 with a two-form flux F = q dx ∧ dφ, the Freund-Rubin compactification. The flux through constant-r circles is co

Load-bearing premise

The claimed Freund-Rubin limit rests on an unverified consistency condition: a limiting constant C from the root factorization must combine with the chosen length scale b to give the correct sphere radius, and the gauge choice must be compatible, but the paper never computes C or substitutes the limiting metric into the field equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For Λ > 0 the Melvin cross-section is finite: no magnetic solenoid of arbitrarily large radius can be embedded, because the space closes into a sphere.
The sign of βℓ − η sets the type of conical singularity, so the model has two geometrically distinct phases separated by the round-sphere flux compactification.
When the cosmological constant is switched off (ℓ → ∞), the standard d-dimensional Melvin universe is recovered as the compact sphere decompactifies.
The magnetic flux through the smooth pole is locally that of a uniform field, while the total flux on the compact sphere behaves as roughly 1/β for strong fields.
Geodesic motion is confined: all orbits are bounded, and the circular orbit radii match the known Λ = 0 values in the decompactification limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the critical limit is exact, the Λ > 0 Melvin solution is a one-parameter conical deformation of a Freund-Rubin compactification, so varying βℓ near η should continuously change the Kaluza-Klein spectrum and the stability properties of the compact sphere; the paper does not perform this spectral analysis.
The same double-Wick-rotation construction with spherical or hyperbolic planar horizons would likely yield S2 × dS or hyperbolic analogues, which are braneworld-type backgrounds; the paper only notes this extension.
The conical singularity at one pole could be interpreted as a thin brane sourcing the geometry, in which case the flux and the conical deficit or excess would determine a brane tension; the paper leaves thermodynamics of such a brane unexplored.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a solid exact-solution paper that does what its title says. The Lambda>0 Melvin spacetime is not new—Astorino and Lim had it—but the close study of this regime is. The compact r interval, the conical singularity dichotomy, the flux behavior, and the geodesics are all worked out cleanly and consistently. I think it deserves a real referee.

What is actually new: the Descartes-rule root analysis that splits the parameter space into Case A and Case B, the embedding diagrams, the total flux ~1/beta behavior, and the circular orbit bounds, including the d=4 zero-Lambda recovery of Melvin and Wallingford. The derivation from the Reissner–Nordström-like metric to Astorino's cylindrical coordinates is explicit and checked. The authors are honest that [32] and [34] already contain the solution, and the citation pattern is fine—the self-citation is legitimate because [34] is a prior derivation of the same solution.

The weak spot is exactly the one flagged: Sec. 2.3. The limit to Freund–Rubin is a sketch, not a derivation. The gauge potential in (2.16b) has an epsilon where beta should be, or at least a silent redefinition; C is never computed, so the condition b^2 C / lambda^{2(d-3)} = 1 is not checked against the critical condition beta ell = eta; the dphi^2 term in (2.17a) is missing the b^2 normalization; and the limiting metric and Maxwell field are not substituted into the Einstein–Maxwell equations. Because the abstract and conclusion advertise this limit, it should be either completed or de-emphasized. It does not undermine the central analysis: the conical singularity, flux, and geodesic results are independent of the Freund–Rubin limit.

Minor issues: a few typos, and Figure 1's caption repeats the same inequality for both regions—harmless but should be fixed. The prose is clear and the physical context, including the comparison with AdS-Melvin and the 'anti-box' intuition, is genuinely helpful.

Bottom line: the central argument holds up. The paper is a useful contribution to the exact-solutions subfield and to the Melvin-with-cosmological-constant literature. A serious referee should ask for a properly worked Sec. 2.3 and a few cleanup edits, then accept. It is the kind of paper a relativity reading group could profitably discuss as a clean example of how root structure controls global geometry.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the d-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell Melvin-type solution with positive cosmological constant, written in Reissner-Nordström-like coordinates. It establishes the coordinate equivalence to Astorino's form, analyzes the domain of the radial coordinate between two roots of f(r), computes the conical singularity structure of the (r,ψ) section, derives the magnetic flux through circles, and studies timelike and null geodesics. A central advertised result is that a particular double-root limit r0→λ yields a Freund–Rubin-type flux compactification R^{1,d-3}×S². The remaining analysis is largely standard and self-contained, with explicit formulas for the flux and geodesic potentials.

Significance. If the Freund–Rubin limit is properly established, the paper provides a new exact link between the Λ>0 Melvin spacetime and flux compactification, alongside a systematic account of the geometry, flux, and geodesics. The paper is transparent about its parameters (β, ℓ, λ), uses explicit coordinate transformations, and recovers known Λ=0 and AdS-Melvin limits. However, the flux-compactification limit in Sec. 2.3 is currently asserted rather than demonstrated; this is the main load-bearing claim advertised in the abstract and conclusion. The rest of the paper is competent and should be publishable once that derivation is supplied or corrected.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.16b)] The limiting gauge potential is not derived correctly as printed. In (2.16b) the magnetic parameter β has been replaced by ε; with the stated χ0 and ψ=(b/ε)φ, the limit gives a constant or divergent A, not q x dφ. If instead one uses β, the expansion with r=λ+ε(x+b) produces A ∝ (x+b)dφ after the leading constant is cancelled, not q x dφ. Please correct the expansion and specify the coordinate shift/gauge choice that yields (2.17b).
[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.17a)] The claimed round S² metric is missing the b² factor in the dφ² term. From the limiting form of (2.16a) with ψ=(b/ε)φ, the second term becomes (b²−x²)dφ² under the stated condition b²C/λ^{2(d−3)}=1, not (1−x²/b²)dφ². The printed metric is not the round sphere of radius b and would not solve (2.2) with F=q dx∧dφ. Please correct Eq. (2.17a) and verify the resulting sphere normalization.
[Sec. 2.3] The constant C is never computed, and the compatibility of the condition b²C/λ^{2(d−3)}=1 with the critical relation βℓ=η is not checked. Since λ is already fixed by βℓ=η via Eq. (3.7), the second condition is an additional constraint; the paper should show it is satisfiable and determine b in terms of ℓ and Λ. The limiting metric and field are also never substituted into the Einstein–Maxwell equations (2.2). Please supply these steps, or state explicitly that the limit is only formal.
[Sec. 3.2, after Eq. (3.12)] The statement that Case A (βℓ>η) gives a conical deficit and Case B (βℓ<η) gives a conical excess is asserted with 'it can be shown' but no proof is given for general d. This is a central qualitative claim of the paper. Please provide a derivation, even a short one, of the inequality |f'(r0)|<|f'(λ)| for Case A and its reverse for Case B.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 1 caption] The caption says 'Case B is the shaded region βℓ>√((d−1)/(d−3)) λ^{d−4}'; the inequality should be βℓ<η. The text and figure indicate the opposite.
[Sec. 4, text around Eq. (4.3)] The sentence 'This case contains the limit ℓ→0 to Λ=0' should read ℓ→∞, since Λ=0 corresponds to ℓ∝Λ^{-1/2}→∞.
[Sec. 3.3, text near the end] The sentence 'In the limit β→∞, f diverges at zero' should read β→0; the paragraph is discussing the vanishing-field limit.
[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.15)] The scaling r=λε(x+b) appears dimensionally inconsistent and likely should be r=λ+ε(x+b) (as the subsequent formulas suggest). Please correct the displayed equation and define the dimensions of x and b explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis is a self-contained study of a known exact solution; self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. It starts from the standard planar-horizon Reissner-Nordström solution (2.3), applies the explicit Wick rotations (2.4) to obtain the magnetic solution (2.5), and states that the result directly solves the Einstein-Maxwell equations (2.2). The subsequent geometry, flux, and geodesic analyses are computed from this metric with no fitted parameters or data-dependent predictions. The only self-citation that could look load-bearing is Ref. [34] for the conical-deficit/excess classification in Sec. 3.2, but the paper also derives the ratios γλ and γ0 in Eqs. (3.10)-(3.12) and provides numerical plots (Fig. 4), so the citation is supplementary rather than the sole support. The Freund-Rubin limit in Sec. 2.3 is an explicit coordinate rescaling of the known solution; while the paper does not substitute the limiting metric and field back into (2.2) and leaves the constant C implicit, that is a technical gap in the limit argument, not a case where the output is assumed in the input. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the chosen ansatz. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. All free parameters are physical inputs (ell, beta) or a gauge choice (lambda). The main axioms are standard GR and calculus tools; the only non-trivial assumption is the Freund-Rubin limiting procedure, which is not fully unpacked.

free parameters (3)

ell
de Sitter radius ell proportional to Lambda^{-1/2}; a physical parameter of the solution, not fitted.
beta
magnetic field parameter; a physical parameter of the solution, not fitted.
lambda
arbitrary length scale chosen as a root of f; sets coordinate units, not a physical parameter.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Einstein-Maxwell equations (2.2) are the correct field equations for action (2.1)
Standard theory; invoked throughout.
standard math A double Wick rotation of a solution yields another solution
Used in Sec. 2.1 to generate the Melvin solution from planar Reissner-Nordstrom.
standard math Descartes' rule of signs applies to P(r) to guarantee at most two positive roots
Used in Sec. 2.3.
ad hoc to paper The limiting procedure in Sec. 2.3 (r0 -> lambda with epsilon scaling) yields a valid solution
The limit is asserted to produce the Freund-Rubin solution; the constant C is not computed explicitly.
domain assumption The spacetime is taken to be smooth except at the conical singularities, which are regularized by choosing Delta psi
Standard treatment of conical singularities in GR.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Properties of the magnetic universe with positive cosmological constant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JBNDCBIC

@misc{pith2026250901374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Properties of the magnetic universe with positive cosmological constant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JBNDCBIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01374}
}

abstract

The properties of the Melvin-type spacetime with a positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$ in $d$-dimensional Einstein--Maxwell gravity is studied. The solution is parametrised in terms of the `de Sitter radius' $\ell\propto\Lambda^{-1/2}$ and the magnetic field parameter $\beta$, and they are warped products of the form $\mathbb{R}^{1,d-3}\times S^2$, where $\mathbb{R}^{1,d-3}$ is the $(d-2)$-dimensional Minkowski spacetime and $S^2$ is topologically a two-sphere which contains a conical singularity, whose nature depends on the product $\beta\ell$. In the limit $\ell\rightarrow\infty$, the $S^2$ decompactifies and the $d$-dimensional Melvin universe is recovered. The Freund--Rubin-type flux compactification model is shown to be another particular limit of this solution. We also calculate the flux and geodesics in this spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01374 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The (ℓ, β)-parameter space for the Melvin universe with positive cosmological constant. Case A is the unshaded domain βℓ > qd−1 d−3 λ d−4 , where λ < r0, and Case B is the shaded region βℓ > q d−1 d−3 λ d−4 where λ > r0. The dashed red line β = 0 corresponds to r0 = 0 < r < λ which is a naked singularity. The blue curve βℓ = qd−1 d−3 λ d−4 is the limit r0 → λ, which was shown in Sec. 2.3 to be the limit to the Freun… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Plots of f(r) vs r for d = 4, β = 0.1λ at various ℓ. In Fig. 2b, the imaginary value ℓ = 100iλ means a negative cosmological constant, Λ = 3 ℓ 2 < 0. Note that as |ℓ| gets larger, we approach the limit of zero cosmological constant, and r0 → ∞ giving the limit of the Λ = 0 Melvin universe. For imaginary ℓ (or Λ < 0), the spacetime is asymptotically Anti-de Sitter [8]. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Plots of f(r) vs r for d = 4, (a) ℓ = 10λ, (b) ℓ = 100λ, (c) ℓ → ∞, and ℓ = 10iλ 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Plots of circumference C vs radius R of constant (r, xa ) circles about λ for d = 4, ℓ = 10λ. As we have chosen the periodicity of ψ to remove the conical singularity at λ, the tangents of each curve near R ∼ 0 have slopes 2π. C-metric [34]. Only in the flux compactifi…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Embedding diagram for d = 4 in various ℓ and β. In Fig. 5a the magnetic field parameter is chosen to be β = 0.2λ, while ℓ is varied. We see that increasing ℓ increases the height of the embedding geometry. In Fig. 5b the cosmological constant parameter is ℓ = 100λ whil…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Plots of flux Φ contained in circles of proper radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Plots of total flux Φtot against β. magnetic fields are being spread out over a large region. It is then natural to expect that the Λ > 0 case is the opposite to Λ < 0. That is, instead of a confining box, we have a repulsive ‘anti-box ’ 3 which spreads out the flux ev…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Graphs of effective potential Ueff for d = 4, ℓ = 100λ, and β = 0.1λ. Here Lc = 0.03736 and Ec = 1.7185 are the energy and angular momentum for a circular orbit of radius rc = 1.2λ. required energy Ec and and angular momentum Lc as expressions parametrised in terms of …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Magnetising de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter spacetimes
gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

A Harrison-type map plus fluid rescaling produces spherical Melvin analogues of dS and AdS that reduce to ordinary (A)dS when the magnetic field vanishes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[32]

Astorino, Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological const ant, JHEP 06 (2012) 086, [ arXiv:1205.6998]

M. Astorino, Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological const ant, JHEP 06 (2012) 086, [ arXiv:1205.6998]

arXiv 2012
[34]

Lim, Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant , Phys

Y.-K. Lim, Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 8 084022, [ arXiv:1807.07199]. 26

arXiv 2018
[1]

J. A. Wheeler, Geons, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 511–536

work page 1955
[2]

M. A. Melvin, Pure magnetic and electric geons , Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 65–70

1964
[3]

W. B. Bonnor, Static Magnetic Fields in General Relativity , Proc. Phys. Soc. A 67 (1954) 225–232

work page 1954
[4]

Misra and L

M. Misra and L. Radhakrishna, Some electromagnetic ﬁelds of cylindrical symmetry , in Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India, Pt. A , vol. 28, Banaras Hindu Univ., India, 1962

1962
[5]

Cosmic Solenoids: Minimal Cross-Section and Generalized Flux Quantization

A. Davidson and D. Karasik, Cosmic solenoids: Minimal cross-section and generalized ﬂux quantization , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 045002, [ gr-qc/9901002]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[6]

Relativistic Solenoids

M. ˇZofka and J. Langer, Relativistic solenoids, Czech. J. Phys. 55 (2005) 157–165, [gr-qc/0502112]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005

Show all 45 references

[7]

Lim, Solenoid Conﬁgurations and Gravitational Free Energy of the AdS–Melvin Spacetime, Entropy 23 (2021), no

Y.-K. Lim, Solenoid Conﬁgurations and Gravitational Free Energy of the AdS–Melvin Spacetime, Entropy 23 (2021), no. 11 1477, [ arXiv:2111.05484]

2021 arXiv
[8]

Kastor and J

D. Kastor and J. Traschen, Geometry of AdS-Melvin Spacetimes , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021), no. 4 045016, [ arXiv:2009.14771]. 24

2021 arXiv
[9]

M. A. Melvin, Dynamics of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Universes , Phys. Rev. 139 (1965) B225–B243

1965
[10]

M. A. Melvin and J. S. Wallingford, Orbits in a magnetic universe , J. Math. Phys. 7 (1966) 333–340

1966
[11]

K. S. Thorne, Absolute Stability of Melvin ’s Magnetic Universe , Phys. Rev. 139 (1965) B244

1965
[12]

Havrdov´ a and P

L. Havrdov´ a and P. Krtouˇ s,Melvin universe as a limit of the C-metric , Gen. Rel. Grav. 39 (2007) 291–296, [ gr-qc/0611092]

2007 arXiv
[13]

Ortaggio, Higher dimensional black holes in external magnetic ﬁelds , JHEP 05 (2005) 048, [ gr-qc/0410048]

M. Ortaggio, Higher dimensional black holes in external magnetic ﬁelds , JHEP 05 (2005) 048, [ gr-qc/0410048]

2005 arXiv
[14]

Bini and B

D. Bini and B. Mashhoon, Static and dynamic Melvin universes , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 12 124012, [ arXiv:2202.02033]

2022 arXiv
[15]

A. A. Golubtsova and V. D. Ivashchuk, On multidimensional analogs of Melvin ’s solution for classical series of Lie algebras , Grav. Cosmol. 15 (2009) 144–147, [ arXiv:1009.3667]

2009 arXiv
[16]

S. V. Bolokhov and V. D. Ivashchuk, On generalized Melvin solutions for Lie algebras of rank 3 , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1390 (2019), no. 1 012093

2019
[17]

S. V. Bolokhov and V. D. Ivashchuk, On generalized Melvin solutions for Lie algebras of rank 4 , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021), no. 2 225, [ arXiv:1912.08083]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Vesel´ y and M

J. Vesel´ y and M. ˇZofka, Cylindrical spacetimes due to radial magnetic ﬁelds , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 2 024048, [ arXiv:2104.01557]

2021 arXiv
[19]

Vesel´ y,Exact spacetimes and their physical properties

J. Vesel´ y,Exact spacetimes and their physical properties . PhD thesis, Charles U., Prague (main), 2022

2022
[20]

Cardoso and J

V. Cardoso and J. Nat´ ario, An exact solution describing a scalar counterpart to the Schwarzschild-Melvin Universe , arXiv:2410.02851
[21]

Biˇ c´ ak, V

J. Biˇ c´ ak, V. Karas, and T. Ledvinka,Black holes and magnetic ﬁelds , IAU Symp. 238 (2007) 139–144, [ astro-ph/0610841]

2007 arXiv
[22]

Jafari, Magnetic Fields in Accretion Disks: A Review , arXiv:1904.09677

A. Jafari, Magnetic Fields in Accretion Disks: A Review , arXiv:1904.09677. 25

1904 arXiv
[23]

F. J. Ernst, Black holes in a magnetic universe , J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976), no. 1 54–56

1976
[24]

Thompson and R

C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, The Soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - 1. Radiative mechanism for outbursts , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 275 (1995) 255–300

1995
[25]

R. F. Archibald, V. M. Kaspi, C. Y. Ng, K. N. Gourgouliato s, D. Tsang, P. Scholz, A. P. Beardmore, N. Gehrels, and J. A. Kennea, An Anti-Glitch in a Magnetar , Nature 497 (2013) 591–593, [ arXiv:1305.6894]

2013 arXiv
[26]

J. D. Barrow, R. Maartens, and C. G. Tsagas, Cosmology with inhomogeneous magnetic ﬁelds, Phys. Rept. 449 (2007) 131–171, [ astro-ph/0611537]

2007 arXiv
[27]

Durrer and A

R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation , Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21 (2013) 62, [ arXiv:1303.7121]

2013 arXiv
[28]

C. G. Tsagas and P. Mavrogiannis, Melvin’s ‘magnetic universe’, the role of the magnetic tension and the implications for gravitational collapse , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021), no. 19 195020, [ arXiv:2011.08245]

2021 arXiv
[29]

Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum , Phys

T. Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum , Phys. Rept. 380 (2003) 235–320, [ hep-th/0212290]

2003 arXiv
[30]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy , Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559–606, [ astro-ph/0207347]

2003 arXiv
[31]

Li, X.-D

M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang, and Y. Wang, Dark Energy: A Brief Review , Front. Phys. (Beijing) 8 (2013) 828–846, [ arXiv:1209.0922]

2013 arXiv
[33]

ˇZofka, Bonnor-Melvin universe with a cosmological constant , Phys

M. ˇZofka, Bonnor-Melvin universe with a cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 4 044058, [ arXiv:1903.08563]

2019 arXiv
[35]

Bouzenada, A

A. Bouzenada, A. Boumali, and F. Ahmed, Dynamics of spin-0 (particles-antiparticles) in Bonnor-Melvin cosmological space-time using the Generali zed Feshbach-Villars transformation, Nucl. Phys. B 1007 (2024) 116682, [ arXiv:2404.10791]

2024 arXiv
[36]

L. B. Castro, A. E. Obispo, and A. G. Jir´ on, Charged scalar bosons in a Bonnor–Melvin- Λ universe at conical approximation , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 5 536, [arXiv:2405.09471]

2024 arXiv
[37]

Ahmed, N

F. Ahmed, N. Candemir, and A. Bouzenada, Fermionic ﬁelds in a four-dimensional Λ Bonnor–Melvin space–time, Theor. Math. Phys. 222 (2025), no. 1 170–182, [arXiv:2503.06675]

2025 arXiv
[38]

P. G. O. Freund and M. A. Rubin, Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction , Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980) 233–235

1980
[39]

Randall and R

L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370–3373, [ hep-ph/9905221]

1999 arXiv
[40]

Randall and R

L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactiﬁcation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690–4693, [ hep-th/9906064]

1999 arXiv
[41]

Bousso, O

R. Bousso, O. DeWolfe, and R. C. Myers, Unbounded entropy in space-times with positive cosmological constant, Found. Phys. 33 (2003) 297–321, [ hep-th/0205080]

2003 arXiv
[42]

G. T. Horowitz and R. C. Myers, The AdS / CFT correspondence and a new positive energy conjecture for general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 026005, [ hep-th/9808079]

1998 arXiv
[43]

Mukohyama, Y

S. Mukohyama, Y. Sendouda, H. Yoshiguchi, and S. Kinosh ita, Warped ﬂux compactiﬁcation and brane gravity , JCAP 07 (2005) 013, [ hep-th/0506050]

2005 arXiv
[44]

Kinoshita, S

S. Kinoshita, S. Mukohyama, and Y. Sendouda, Stability of a de Sitter brane in a six-dimensional braneworld, in 16th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation , pp. 184–187, 2006

2006
[45]

Kinoshita, Y

S. Kinoshita, Y. Sendouda, and S. Mukohyama, Instability of de Sitter brane and horizon entropy in 6D braneworld , JCAP 05 (2007) 018, [ hep-th/0703271]. 27

2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [32]

Astorino, Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological const ant, JHEP 06 (2012) 086, [ arXiv:1205.6998]

M. Astorino, Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological const ant, JHEP 06 (2012) 086, [ arXiv:1205.6998]

arXiv 2012

[2] [34]

Lim, Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant , Phys

Y.-K. Lim, Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 8 084022, [ arXiv:1807.07199]. 26

arXiv 2018

[3] [1]

J. A. Wheeler, Geons, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 511–536

work page 1955

[4] [2]

M. A. Melvin, Pure magnetic and electric geons , Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 65–70

1964

[5] [3]

W. B. Bonnor, Static Magnetic Fields in General Relativity , Proc. Phys. Soc. A 67 (1954) 225–232

work page 1954

[6] [4]

Misra and L

M. Misra and L. Radhakrishna, Some electromagnetic ﬁelds of cylindrical symmetry , in Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India, Pt. A , vol. 28, Banaras Hindu Univ., India, 1962

1962

[7] [5]

Cosmic Solenoids: Minimal Cross-Section and Generalized Flux Quantization

A. Davidson and D. Karasik, Cosmic solenoids: Minimal cross-section and generalized ﬂux quantization , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 045002, [ gr-qc/9901002]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999

[8] [6]

Relativistic Solenoids

M. ˇZofka and J. Langer, Relativistic solenoids, Czech. J. Phys. 55 (2005) 157–165, [gr-qc/0502112]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005