Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Noise-induced Zeno-like effect in a spin-chain quantum battery

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that strong bit-phase-flip noise can speed charging and stabilize stored energy in a six-spin quantum battery, a Zeno-like effect rather than simple decoherence damage.

desk verdict A sound noise-channel comparison for a spin-chain quantum battery, with a credible bit-phase-flip stabilization effect, but the N=6 initial state is sloppily specified and needs a fix before the numbers can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01603 v2 pith:YUWKIV62 submitted 2025-09-01 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Maulana M. Fajar , Beta N. Pratiwi , Subur Pramono , Gagus K. Sunnardianto , Ahmad R. T. Nugraha This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumbatteryspinchainergotropyZenoeffectdecoherencenoise-assistedchargingHeisenbergXYZmodelLindbladmasterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a Heisenberg XYZ spin-chain quantum battery coupled to local charging and discharging baths, with bit-flip, phase-flip, or bit-phase-flip noise added at various strengths. Its central claim is that noise is not always harmful: in the high-strength regime, bit-phase-flip noise accelerates charging and stabilizes both stored energy and ergotropy, while the same noise at low strength degrades performance. Phase-flip noise slows charging but makes discharge slower, extending usable battery lifetime; bit-flip noise charges fast but stores little and releases energy quickly. The paper concludes that suitably engineered environmental noise can be a resource for quantum battery design, not merely an obstacle.

What carries the argument

The central object is the open-system Lindblad dynamics of an anisotropic Heisenberg XYZ spin chain under a transverse magnetic field, with the Hamiltonian normalized by the energy scale ΔE = E_max − E_min. Each spin is coupled to local bosonic baths: absorption channels for charging and relaxation channels for discharging. Superimposed local Pauli noise channels—bit-flip (σx), phase-flip (σz), and bit-phase-flip (σy)—act independently on each spin. The key diagnostic is ergotropy W(t), the maximum work extractable by unitary operations, compared to stored energy E_B(t), alongside purity, ℓ1-norm coherence, and trace distance. The Zeno-like stabilization is the suppression of coherent rephas

What would settle it

Run the same Lindblad dynamics for N=6 with an explicitly specified six-spin fully polarized initial state and compare: if strong bit-phase-flip noise does not produce both faster charging and a stabilized energy/ergotropy plateau with W/E_B near 0.99, the Zeno-like claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that bit-phase-flip noise exhibits a Zeno-like behavior in a Heisenberg XYZ spin-chain quantum battery: in the high-noise-strength regime it enhances charging speed and stabilizes stored energy and ergotropy, whereas at low noise strengths it degrades performance. For a six-spin chain, the ergotropy-to-energy ratio W(t)/E_B(t) reaches about 0.99, meaning nearly all stored energy is extractable as work. The mechanism is the combination of dephasing, which suppresses destructive coherent revivals, and bit-flip population transfer, which cooperates with the charging bath. The paper also reports that phase-flip noise slows charging but prolongs discharge, while bit-f

Load-bearing premise

The numerical results assume the six-spin battery starts in a state the paper describes as the fully polarized ρ↓_B of Eq. (14), but Eq. (14) actually defines a two-spin entangled state; if the true initial state used in the numerics differs, all charging and discharging curves would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Noise engineering becomes a control knob: choosing the noise channel and its strength tunes a spin-chain battery between fast-charging/high-power and slow-discharge/long-lifetime operation.
  • In the high-strength bit-phase-flip regime, a battery can be simultaneously fast-charging and stable, with nearly all stored energy extractable as work (ergotropy-to-energy ratio about 0.99).
  • Phase-flip noise, though it slows charging, can act as a discharge stabilizer: energy and ergotropy are released more slowly, extending usable battery lifetime.
  • Bit-flip noise alone sacrifices capacity: it gives quick charging but low storage and rapid energy release.
  • For density-matrix simulations, N=6 is presented as the practical sweet spot: larger chains store more but cost exponential resources, while smaller chains retain a larger passive, non-extractable component.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same Zeno-like trade-off may appear in other interacting many-body battery models whenever a dephasing channel can be tuned to match the intrinsic coupling scale; the paper's discussion of coupling strength J hints at this but does not explore it.
  • Editorial inference: the bit-phase-flip advantage suggests a concrete experimental route—deliberately engineering σy-type noise, for example by shaping the environment's spectral density—rather than trying to eliminate all decoherence.
  • Editorial inference: the open question of an optimal interaction strength J could be tested numerically by scanning J for each noise channel and strength; if some J values close the noisy/noiseless performance gap, co-engineering interactions and noise becomes a design principle.
  • Editorial inference: because the N=6 choice is computational, a tensor-network extension to larger chains would show whether the ~0.99 ergotropy ratio and the Zeno plateau persist toward the thermodynamic limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an open quantum battery modeled as a Heisenberg XYZ spin chain with local bosonic charging/discharging baths, evolving under a Markovian Lindblad master equation. After comparing chain sizes N=2-8 under dephasing, it identifies N=6 as an optimal operating point and reports an ergotropy-to-energy ratio near 0.99. It then compares local bit-flip, phase-flip, and bit-phase-flip noise during charging and discharging. The central claim is that bit-phase-flip noise at high noise strength induces a 'Zeno-like' constructive effect: accelerated charging, high stored energy, and high ergotropy, whereas bit-flip and phase-flip degrade performance in the expected ways.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the channel-specific asymmetry reported here is a useful contribution to the quantum battery literature, where noise is usually treated only as detrimental. The paper compares three Pauli channels and supports the energetic analysis with purity, coherence, and trace-distance diagnostics. It is also a strength that the results are obtained by direct numerical solution of a stated Lindblad equation and involve no parameter fitting. However, two essential simulation inputs are not specified as written: the N=6 initial state and the value of the drive amplitude omega. These gaps make the central numerical claims non-reproducible in their present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (3), captions of Figs. 2-5] The N=6 charging and discharging runs are initialized using 'the fully polarized state rho_down^B [Eq. (14)]' and 'the charged polarized state rho_up^B (Eq. 14)'. However, Eq. (14) is a 4x4 density matrix for the N=2 eigenstate of H0 in Eq. (10) and contains |00><11| coherence; it is not a fully polarized six-spin state. No N=6 initial density matrix is otherwise defined. Since the ergotropy dynamics and the noise threshold for the claimed enhancement can depend on initial coherence and entanglement, Figs. 3-5 are numerically under-specified as written. Please state explicitly the N=6 initial state (e.g., a product state |down...down> or |up...up>) and clarify that Eq. (14) is only the N=2 baseline. Depositing the simulation code would also settle this issue.
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (3), Fig. 2 caption] The charging Hamiltonian H_c = (omega/2) sum_i sigma_i^x contains a dimensionless amplitude omega, but no numerical value is ever assigned. The text and captions state only 'omega < 1'. All charging curves, power peaks, and ergotropy dynamics depend on omega, so the simulations cannot be reproduced without this number. Please give the exact omega used for each figure and state whether it is fixed across N and across noise strengths.
  3. [Sec. IV] The central interpretation 'Zeno-like behavior' is not pinned down by a quantitative criterion. In the usual quantum Zeno effect, strong measurement or environment coupling suppresses transitions, whereas the reported bit-phase-flip regime shows accelerated charging at high noise. The paper explains the effect through suppression of destructive recurrences plus population transfer, which is closer to environment-assisted transport. If the authors wish to retain 'Zeno-like', they should define an operational signature (e.g., survival-probability plateau, effective transition rate decreasing with noise, or suppression of coherent oscillations) and demonstrate it in the data; otherwise the phrase in the title and conclusions should be qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] Typo: 'extractors during harging' should be 'extractors during charging'.
  2. [Eq. (14) and Sec. III B] The notation rho_B^(up,down) in Eq. (14) is not mapped to the states rho_down^B and rho_up^B used in Sec. III B. Please explain which superscript corresponds to which physical state.
  3. [Sec. III B 2, Fig. 5(d)-(f)] The ratio E_B^*(t)/E_B(t) is described as 'the efficiency of conversion of energy to work', but the plotted ratio uses released energy, not released ergotropy W^*(t). Please clarify what the ratio quantifies.
  4. [Acknowledgments / Code availability] The manuscript says the codes and data are 'available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request'. Given the missing parameter values noted above, a public repository with the code and exact run parameters would greatly improve verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: results are direct numerical solutions of a stated master equation with no fitted parameters; the Eq. (14) initial-state ambiguity is a reproducibility issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are obtained by numerically integrating the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad master equation, Eq. (4), with explicitly stated Hamiltonians, Lindblad operators, coupling constants, and noise strengths (Secs. II and III). No parameter is fitted to the target quantities (stored energy, ergotropy, charging power, W/E ratio); these are computed from the time-evolved density matrix via standard definitions in Eqs. (6)-(9). The 'Zeno-like' label is an interpretation of the observed damping/stabilization, not a quantity defined in terms of a fitted constant, and no conclusion is fed back into the premises. The paper is therefore self-contained against an external numerical benchmark (the Lindblad equation with stated parameters). The only serious flaw flagged by the reader is that Sec. III B 1 and III B 2 refer to Eq. (14) as the 'fully polarized' or 'charged polarized' initial state, while Eq. (14) is a 4x4 two-spin entangled ground-state density matrix; for N=6 this is dimensionally inconsistent and leaves the numerical initial state under-specified. This is a reproducibility/correctness ambiguity, not a circularity: it does not make any derived quantity equivalent to an input by construction. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. [41] in a list of standard ergotropy references) are present but not load-bearing: the derivations and simulations do not depend on an unverified uniqueness claim or on an ansatz imported solely from the authors' prior work. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; all couplings and rates are explicit inputs scanned over ranges. The central assumptions are the Markovian open-system framework and the independence of local noise channels. The initial state for N=6 is an unverified ad hoc assumption because the paper references a two-spin state for a six-spin simulation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Markovian Lindblad master equation correctly describes the open-system dynamics
    Used in Eq. (4) for all charging and discharging simulations; assumes weak coupling and memoryless baths.
  • domain assumption Local bosonic reservoirs and Pauli noise channels act independently on each spin
    Implied by the decomposition of collapse operators in Eq. (5).
  • standard math Ergotropy is the correct measure of extractable work
    Definition in Eq. (6), consistent with quantum thermodynamics literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The N=6 simulation initial state exists and matches the description
    The text references Eq. (14), a two-spin state, for the N=6 setup; this is not a valid N=6 initial state, so an unspecified assumption is being made.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Noise-induced Zeno-like effect in a spin-chain quantum battery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUWKIV62

@misc{pith2026250901603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Noise-induced Zeno-like effect in a spin-chain quantum battery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUWKIV62}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01603}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum batteries, which are energy-storage or state-storage devices that exploit unique quantum effects, are sensitive to environmental noise. Here, we demonstrate that suitably engineered noise can induce a "Zeno-like" stabilization effect of the charging process in a spin-chain quantum battery within the Heisenberg XYZ model. Focusing on a system size N=6, which balances computational cost and storage capacity, we find that the ergotropy-to-energy ratio W(t)/E_B(t) attains a maximum value of about 0.99 at a certain time parameter value. Then, by varying the noise strength in each channel, we find that not only does decoherence merely degrade performance but it may also stabilize stored energy and ergotropy in the high noise strength regime. For instance, the phase-flip channel slows charging and reduces charging power, but its discharging behavior releases energy and ergotropy more slowly, allowing the battery to be used for longer times compared to bit-flip and bit-phase-flip channels. In contrast, the bit-flip channel enables fast charging, but yields low storage and rapid energy release. Remarkably, the bit-phase-flip channel can combine the advantages of both bit-flip and phase-flip channels in the high-noise-strength regime. The bit-phase-flip channel supports accelerated charging together with enhanced storage capacity, while its discharging behavior resembles that of the bit-flip channel with rapid energy release. These results reveal that, under sufficiently strong noise, environmental decoherence induces a Zeno-like stabilization, allowing it to achieve enhanced charging performance and to stabilize stored energy and ergotropy in the spin-chain quantum battery.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01603 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the quantum battery model based on an open spin-1/2 chain with nearest-neighbor interactions. Each spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Performance of a quantum battery based on an anisotropic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Performance of a quantum battery under local noise channels for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Quantum-information metrics of the quantum battery during the charging process for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Performance of a quantum battery under local noise channels for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Charging process We initialize the quantum battery in the fully polarized state 𝜌↓ 𝐵 [Eq. (14)] and charge it via a coherent drive ˆ𝐻𝑐with frequency𝜔 <1, assisted by a local bosonic bath that in- duces excitation channels𝐿 +,𝑖 =√Γ+,𝜎𝑖 +,Γ +/Δ𝐸=0.01, while the discharging channels are turned off,𝐿−,𝑖 =√Γ−,𝜎𝑖 − withΓ −/Δ𝐸=0, and all rates are scaled by the ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Discharging process After the charging process, we investigate the release of useful work by initializing the battery in the charged polar- ized state𝜌 ↑ 𝐵 (Eq. 14). During the discharging process, the 9 FIG. 4. Quantum-information metrics of the quantum battery during the charging process for𝑁=6 spins under local noise channels. (a)–(c) PurityP(𝑡). (d)–(...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Carnot,Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire, and on Machines Fitted to Develop That Power(John Wiley, 1897) translated and Edited by R.H

    S. Carnot,Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire, and on Machines Fitted to Develop That Power(John Wiley, 1897) translated and Edited by R.H. Thurston

    work page

  4. [4]

    Fermi,Thermodynamics(Courier Corporation, 1956)

    E. Fermi,Thermodynamics(Courier Corporation, 1956)

    work page 1956

  5. [5]

    K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Perarnau-Llobet, M. Huber, and A. Ac´ın, Entanglement generation is not necessary for optimal work extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 240401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Gyhm and U

    J.-Y. Gyhm and U. R. Fischer, Beneficial and detrimental en- tanglement for quantum battery charging, A VS Quantum Sci.6, 012001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    T. D. Kieu, The second law, Maxwell’s demon, and work deriv- able from quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 140403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Uzdin, A

    R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Equivalence of quantum heat machines, and quantum-thermodynamic signatures, Phys. Rev. X5, 031044 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quanta- cell: powerful charging of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.17, 075015 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C ´eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 150601 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Hadipour and S

    M. Hadipour and S. Haseli, Enhancing the efficiency of open quantum batteries via adjusting the classical driving field, Re- sults Phys.64, 107928 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantifying co- herence, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 140401 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Charger-mediated energy transfer in exactly solvable models for quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. B98, 205423 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    T. P. Le, J. Levinsen, K. Modi, M. M. Parish, and F. A. Pollock, Spin-chain model of a many-body quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A97, 022106 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Lai, J.-D

    P.-R. Lai, J.-D. Lin, Y.-T. Huang, H.-C. Jan, and Y.-N. Chen, Quick charging of a quantum battery with superposed trajecto- ries, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023136 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Murphy, A

    D. Murphy, A. Kiely, I. D’ Amico, and S. Campbell, Ergotopy transport in a one dimensional spin chain, arXiv:2508.04770

  11. [19]

    Beder, D

    I. Beder, D. Ferraro, and P. A. Brand˜ao, Work extraction from a quantum battery charged through an array of coupled cavities, arXiv:2508.19135

  12. [20]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes, Phys. Rev. E91, 032119 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid-state quan- tum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Song, H.-B

    W.-L. Song, H.-B. Liu, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.-H. An, Remote charging and degradation suppression for the quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 090401 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    R. K. Shukla, R. Kumar, U. Sen, and S. K. Mishra, Optimizing quantum battery performance by reducing battery influence in charging dynamics, arXiv:2505.08029

  16. [24]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Ghosh, T

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, S. Mal, and A. Sen(De), Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise, Phys. Rev. A104, 032207 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Song, J.-L

    W.-L. Song, J.-L. Wang, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.-H. An, Self-discharging mitigated quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020405 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Misra and E

    B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, The Zeno’s paradox in quan- tum theory, J. Math. Phys.18, 756 (1977)

    1977

  20. [28]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open quantum systems: An intro- duction, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Shastri, C

    R. Shastri, C. Jiang, G.-H. Xu, B. P. Venkatesh, and G. Watan- abe, Dephasing enabled fast charging of quantum batteries, npj Quantum Inf.11, 9 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    S. Xie, M. Sajjan, A. Ajoy, and S. Kais, Modulator-assisted local control of quantum battery via Zeno effect, arXiv:2506.18276

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ghosh and A

    S. Ghosh and A. Sen(De), Dimensional enhancements in a quantum battery with imperfections, Phys. Rev. A105, 022628 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Verma, I

    D. Verma, I. V. S., and R. Sankaranarayanan, Dynamics of heisenberg xyz two-spin quantum battery, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl.659, 130352 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open- source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1760 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z

    W. Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z. Phys.49, 619 (1928)

    1928

  28. [36]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Ghosh, T

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, and A. Sen(De), Enhancement in the performance of a quantum battery by ordered and disordered interactions, Phys. Rev. A101, 032115 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. Sudarshan, Completely pos- itive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  31. [39]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  32. [40]

    Huang,Statistical Mechanics(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987)

    K. Huang,Statistical Mechanics(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987)

    1987

  33. [41]

    A. E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Max- imal work extraction from finite quantum systems, Europhys. Lett.67, 565 (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Farina, G

    D. Farina, G. M. Andolina, A. Mari, M. Polini, and V. Giovan- 12 netti, Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: an open system approach, Phys. Rev. B99, 035421 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    M. S. Ukhtary, A. R. T. Nugraha, A. B. Cahaya, A. Rusydi, and M. A. Majidi, High-performance Kerr quantum battery, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 034001 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Lostaglio, D

    M. Lostaglio, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Description of quan- tum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy, Nat. Commun.6, 6383 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Korzekwa, M

    K. Korzekwa, M. Lostaglio, J. Oppenheim, and D. Jennings, The extraction of work from quantum coherence, New J. Phys. 18, 023045 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, Quantum coherence and ergotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180603 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing assisted transport: Quantum networks and biomolecules, New J. Phys.10, 113019 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Facchi and S

    P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Quantum Zeno dynamics: Mathemat- ical and physical aspects, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 493001 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Rebentrost, M

    P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum transport, New J. Phys. 11, 033003 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    Maier, T

    C. Maier, T. Brydges, P. Jurcevic, N. Trautmann, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Environment- assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 050501 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    F. H. Kamin, F. T. Tabesh, S. Salimi, and A. C. Santos, Entan- glement, coherence, and charging process of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E102, 052109 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.