Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 48 references

The paper demonstrates that a nested multipass mirror cell can delay single photons by up to 687 ns with 95.390(5)% retrieval efficiency while preserving polarization entanglement with 99.6(9)% fidelity, giving a time-bandwidth product of 3

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 11:52 UTC pith:DF2SIS3I

load-bearing objection A genuinely new experimental result—high-efficiency, high-fidelity entanglement preservation in a nested multipass cell—with a headline TBP that is extrapolated from reflectance sampling, not demonstrated on a broadband pulse. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.02096 v1 pith:DF2SIS3I submitted 2025-09-02 quant-ph physics.optics

Highly Efficient and Broadband Optical Delay Line towards a Quantum Memory

Yu Guo , Anindya Banerji , Jia Boon Chin , Arya Chowdhury , Alexander Ling This is my paper
classification quant-ph physics.optics
keywords optical delay linequantum memorynested multipass cellHerriott cellpolarization entanglementtime-bandwidth productquantum networksbroadband dielectric coatings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that a free-space nested multipass mirror cell—a geometric arrangement of coaxial mirrors that bounces light many times—can serve as a practical building block for all-optical quantum memory. It shows that signal photons from an entangled pair, after a single pass through the cell delayed by up to 687 ns, are retrieved with 95.390(5)% efficiency while the two-photon polarization state survives with fidelity 99.6(9)%. Because the mirrors carry broadband coatings reflecting more than 99.99% over a 60 nm window centered at 565 nm, the device combines a long storage time with a 56.4 THz bandwidth, yielding a time-bandwidth product of 3.87×10^7. If correct, this offers a room-temperature, wavelength-flexible delay line that could synchronize photons in quantum networks and support temporal multiplexing without the material constraints of matter-based memories.

Core claim

The central claim is that a nested Herriott multipass cell preserves the quantum state of light well enough to act as an all-optical quantum memory. Signal photons routed through the cell and retrieved after delays up to 687 ns emerge with 95.390(5)% efficiency, and the reconstructed quantum process of the cell is 99.1(5)% close to an identity channel. Entangled-photon tomography after the delay returns a fidelity of 99.6(9)% with the input Bell state, while polarization visibility drops only from 97.65(1)% to 97.50(2)%. The delay is discretely controllable from 1.8 ns to 687 ns in steps of about 12.6 ns by rotating the exit mirror to select how many reflections occur before the beam leaves

What carries the argument

The central object is the nested multipass (Herriott) cell: two concave mirrors of different radii of curvature, with the smaller mirror embedded coaxially inside the larger. A beam entering through a small pupil in the outer mirror bounces in semi-elliptical arcs; each encounter with the inner mirror rotates the trajectory by an angle set by the curvature mismatch, so the reflection spots fill stable concentric rings rather than a single ellipse. Rotating the exit mirror moves the exit pupil to a chosen spot on the outermost ring, selecting the number of reflections—and hence the delay time—while preserving the spot geometry. The argument depends on per-reflection reflectance: at an estimat

Load-bearing premise

The headline time-bandwidth product of 3.87×10^7 assumes the cell's 99.99% reflectance holds uniformly across the whole 60 nm bandwidth, but the supporting measurements sample only nine discrete wavelengths and rely on the manufacturer's coating model; if reflectance or polarization response degrades near the band edges, the effective bandwidth—and therefore the TBP—would be lower.

What would settle it

Store a single broadband optical pulse spanning 532–595 nm in the cell at the 687 ns delay and compare the input and output spectra and total transmission. If the output spectrum is measurably distorted, or if the efficiency measured separately at 532 nm and 595 nm falls significantly below the 95.4% average, the uniform 60 nm bandwidth claim and the stated time-bandwidth product are falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • A room-temperature, free-space, polarization-preserving delay line can be used for quantum state synchronization without cryogenics, atomic resonances, or narrowband filtering.
  • The time-bandwidth product of 3.87×10^7 implies the cell can buffer many temporal modes, supporting temporal multiplexing and feed-forward operations in scalable quantum networks.
  • The discretely adjustable delay—1.8 ns to 687 ns in steps of about 12.6 ns—provides a simple mechanical control for photon timing and path-length matching.
  • Coating the same nested-cell geometry for telecom wavelengths should, by the authors' estimate, outperform ultra-low-loss optical fiber at comparable delays because free-space reflection loss is lower than fiber attenuation over a 687 ns window.
  • Integrating fast optical switches, as the authors suggest, would allow multiple sequential transits and on-demand retrieval, extending storage times toward the microsecond regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not demonstrated here: because the delay mechanism is geometric and wavelength-independent apart from the coating, the same cell should preserve time-bin or frequency-encoded qubits in addition to polarization, which could be tested with a time-bin entangled source.
  • The measured per-reflection reflectance suggests the dominant loss at long delays comes from dust and free-space scattering rather than the mirrors themselves; in a cleaner environment the 687 ns retrieval efficiency could approach 99%, making the device competitive with much longer fiber spools.
  • If a fast switch is added for multiple passes, the efficiency after N transits scales roughly as (0.9539)^N for the maximum-delay configuration, so the practical storage ceiling depends mainly on switch insertion loss—an explicit trade-off the paper leaves for future work.
  • The discrete delay step of roughly 12.6 ns is set by the mirror geometry and the 6-reflection periodicity; using mirrors with different curvature ratios could produce a finer or coarser delay grid, which may matter for clock-synchronization applications in quantum networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a free-space optical delay line based on a nested multipass (Herriott-type) cell, aimed at all-optical quantum memory applications. The device delays 562.7 nm signal photons from a polarization-entangled SPDC source by 1.8 to 687 ns in discrete steps while maintaining a retrieval efficiency of 95.390(5)% at the longest delay. The authors report per-reflection reflectance estimates near 99.99%, agree with the manufacturer's coating model over a 60 nm bandwidth, and demonstrate preservation of polarization entanglement with a two-photon state fidelity of 99.6(9)% and a quantum process fidelity of 99.1(5)% with the identity channel. The headline figure of merit is a time-bandwidth product of 3.87e7, obtained from the 687 ns delay and a 56.4 THz bandwidth inferred from nine discrete efficiency measurements and the coating model. The paper includes comparisons with fiber-based and other delay-line memories.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the device is a significant practical step for all-optical quantum memories: room-temperature operation, no active control, high retrieval efficiency, polarization preservation, and a very large nominal time-bandwidth product. The directly measured quantities—retrieval efficiency, delay control, entanglement fidelity, and process fidelity—are internally consistent and well matched to the stated claims. The per-reflection reflectance derived from efficiency and reflection count agrees with the manufacturer's coating data, and the quantum tomography results are credible. The main weakness is that the headline TBP is an inferred, not directly demonstrated, multi-temporal-mode capacity; no broadband pulse or dispersion measurement is presented. This does not undermine the measured device performance but does affect the strength of the positioning as a quantum memory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2), Fig. 3] The headline TBP = 3.87e7 is not demonstrated as a temporal-mode capacity. The bandwidth Δν = 56.4 THz is inferred from nine discrete retrieval-efficiency measurements at 532–595 nm plus the manufacturer's coating model, and the quantum experiments use CW SPDC photons at a single wavelength (562.7 nm). No measurement of group-delay dispersion, spectral phase, or transmission of a genuinely broadband pulse is reported. A wavelength-dependent delay or coating dispersion would temporally spread a short pulse and reduce the number of addressable modes, making the stated TBP an upper bound rather than a measured capacity. Since Sec. 2.1 explicitly motivates TBP by 'buffering of multiple temporal modes,' this is load-bearing for the quantum-memory claim. Please either add a short-pulse or dispersion characterization over the 60 nm band, or revise the text to call this an available-bandwidth TB
  2. [Sec. 2.1, Table 1] The 'per-reflection reflectance' values in Table 1 are obtained by algebraically dividing the measured efficiency by the number of reflections, implicitly attributing all loss to mirror reflectance. However, the text in Fig. 3 attributes the difference from the manufacturer model to scattering from dust and free-space attenuation. The quoted reflectance should therefore be labeled an effective loss-per-reflection, not a direct coating measurement. Also clarify the formula used and the definition of 'No. of Spots': Fig. 2 lists 9, 96, and 189 reflections with the total in the cell double these numbers, while Table 1 lists 18, 42, 192, 204, 228, and 378. The reader cannot tell whether the table entries are total reflections or spots per mirror.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] Typo: 'configurtaon' should be 'configuration'.
  2. [Eq. (4)] 'T rstands for trace' should read 'Tr stands for trace'.
  3. [Discussion] Typo: 'demonstrats' should be 'demonstrates'.
  4. [Sec. 2.1] 'Systemic delays' should be 'Systematic delays'.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says the area enclosed by the vertical dashed lines is the operational wavelength range, but the basis for that range (e.g., the 99.99% reflectance specification) is not stated in the caption or in the text. Please define the dashed lines explicitly.
  6. [Sec. 2.3, Fig. 7] The comparison with ULL fiber is based on theoretical loss curves and an assumed future coating set, not on current measurements. This should be explicitly framed as an extrapolation/projection, especially in the sentence 'our system achieves higher efficiencies.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on direct measurements and independent manufacturer data; the only self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The retrieval efficiency (95.390(5)% at 687 ns) is a directly measured coincidence ratio; the per-reflection reflectance is then derived algebraically from efficiency and reflection count (R = E^(1/N)), which is a standard characterization, not a fitted parameter presented as a prediction. The time-bandwidth product is defined as TBP = Δν ΔT (Eq. 2) and uses the measured 687 ns delay together with a 60 nm coating bandwidth. The bandwidth is supported by nine efficiency measurements across 532–595 nm and the manufacturer's independent coating model (Fig. 3); this is an extrapolation about usable bandwidth rather than a circular reduction. The fidelity (99.6(9)%) is from two-photon state tomography with a direct comparison of input and output density matrices, not from a fitted model. The only self-citation, ref. [40], describes the SPDC source used as an input tool; that source is also independently characterized in the present paper (average visibility 97.65(1)% without the delay line), so the citation is not load-bearing. The reviewer's concern that a short-pulse or phase-dispersion test is missing across the full 60 nm band is a correctness/validation gap, not circularity, because no term in the derivation is defined in terms of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The measured claims rest on standard optics and on the manufacturer's coating certificate; the main assumptions are the polarization independence and achromaticity of the coatings, which are not directly verified at the band edges.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Geometric optics and Gaussian beam propagation accurately describe ray trajectories in the nested multipass cell (Sec. 3, Fig. 8).
    Used to simulate spot patterns and beam sizes; standard optical modeling.
  • domain assumption The mirror coatings are polarization-independent and achromatic across the 60 nm band.
    The paper claims polarization preservation and broadband operation; polarization dependence of the coating is not separately measured across the band.
  • domain assumption The manufacturer's reflectance model is accurate between the nine measured wavelengths.
    Supports the interpolation leading to the 99.99% average reflectance and the 60 nm bandwidth claim (Fig. 3).
  • domain assumption The SPDC source described in ref [40] produces the stated |phi+> Bell state with the quoted visibility.
    The fidelity and visibility measurements assume the input state is characterized correctly; ref [40] is a companion paper by the same group.
  • domain assumption Rotating the exit mirror to change the number of reflections does not introduce additional loss or polarization effects.
    The delay control mechanism presumes the spot pattern and beam alignment remain stable across configurations.

pith-pipeline@v1.4.0-alltime-deepseek-medium · 8609 in / 14436 out tokens · 150484 ms · 2026-08-05T11:52:22.024918+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly Efficient and Broadband Optical Delay Line towards a Quantum Memory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DF2SIS3I

@misc{pith2026250902096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly Efficient and Broadband Optical Delay Line towards a Quantum Memory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DF2SIS3I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02096}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We demonstrate a high-efficiency, free space optical delay line utilizing a nested multipass cell architecture. This design supports extended optical paths with low loss, aided by custom broadband dielectric coating that provides high reflectivity across a wide spectral bandwidth. The cell is characterized using polarization-entangled photon pairs, with signal photons routed through the delay line and idler photons used as timing reference. Quantum state tomography performed on the entangled pair reveals entanglement preservation with a fidelity of $99.6(9)\%$ following a single-transit delay of up to $687$~ns, accompanied by a photon retrieval efficiency of $95.390(5)%$. The delay is controllable and can be set between $1.8$~ns to $687$~ns in $\sim12.6$~ns increments. The longest delay and wide spectral bandwidth result in a time-bandwidth product of $3.87\times 10^7$. These results position this delay line as a strong candidate for all-optical quantum memories and synchronization modules for scalable quantum networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kimble, The Quantum Internet, Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008)

    H.J. Kimble, The Quantum Internet, Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum Internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Simon, M

    C. Simon, M. Afzelius, J. Appel, A. Boyer de la Giroday, S, J, Dewhurst, N. Gisin, et al., Quantum Memories, Eur. Phys. J D 58, 1–22 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Bussi` eres, N

    F. Bussi` eres, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Prospective applications of optical quantum memories, J. Mod. Opt. 60, 1519–1537 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Heshami, D.G

    K. Heshami, D.G. England, P.C. Humphreys, P.J. Bustard, et al, Quantum mem- ories: emerging applications and recent advances, J. Mod. Opt., 63, 2005–2028 (2016)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Fleischhauer, and M.D

    M. Fleischhauer, and M.D. Lukin, Quantum memory for photons: Dark-state polaritons, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 022314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    K.F. Reim, J. Nunn, V.O. Lorenz, B.J. Sussman, et al, Single-photon-level quantum memory at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 053603 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Zhong, M.P

    M. Zhong, M.P. Hedges, R.L. Ahlefeldt, J.G. Bartholomew, et al, Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time, Nature, 517, 177–180 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Afzelius, C

    M. Afzelius, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Demonstration of atomic frequency comb memory for light with spin-wave storage, Nature Physics, 5, 485–488 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Zhong, J.M

    T. Zhong, J.M. Kinden, J.G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, et al., Nanophotonic rare-earth quantum memory with optically controlled retrieval, Science357, 1392 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    J.H. Shim, I. Neimeyer, J. Zhang, and D. Suter, Room-temperature high-speed nuclear-spin quantum memory in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Jelezko, T

    F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, M. Domhan, et al, Observation of Coherent Oscil- lation of a Single Nuclear Spin and Realization of a Two-Qubit Conditional Quantum Gate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 130501 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    M.V.G. Dutt, L. Childress, L. Jiang, E. Togan, et al, Quantum Register Based on Individual Electronic and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond, Science 316, 1312 (2007). 12

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Neumann, N

    P. Neumann, N. Mizuochi, F. Rempp, P. Hemmer, et al, Multipartite Entangle- ment Among Single Spins in Diamond, Science 320, 1326 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Abobeih, J

    M.H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M.A. Bakker, N. Kalb, et al, One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment, Nat. Commun., 9, 2552 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Bradley, J

    C.E. Bradley, J. Randall, M.H. Abobeih, R.C. Berrevoets, et al, A ten-qubit solid- state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute, Phys. Rev. X, 9, 031045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Broadband Quantum Memory in Atomic Ensembles

    K. Shinborough, D. R. Pearson Jr., B. Fang, E. A. Goldschmidt, and V. O. Lorenz, Broadband quantum memory in atomic ensembles, arxiv:2301.08772 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Hedges, J.J

    M.P. Hedges, J.J. Longdell, Y. Li, and M.J. Sellars, Efficient quantum memory for light, Nature, 465, 1052–1056 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Zheng, Y

    Y. Zheng, Y. Wu, Y. Pu, X. Zhou, et al., Room temperature nuclear spin hyperpolarization for quantum sensing and storage, Nat. Phys., 18, 1093–1098 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Lvovsky, B.C

    A.I. Lvovsky, B.C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nat. Photon., 3, 706–714 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Saglamyurek, N

    E. Saglamyurek, N. Sinclair, J. Jin, J.A. Slater, et al., Broadband waveguide quantum memory for entangled photons, Nature, 469, 512–515 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Pittman, and J.D

    T.B. Pittman, and J.D. Franson, Cyclical quantum memory for photonic qubits, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 062302 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    T. B. Pittman, B. C. Jacobs, and J. D. Franson, Single photons on pseudodemand from stored parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042303 (2002)

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    K.F. Lee, G. Gul, Z. Jim, and P. Kumar, Fiber loop quantum buffer for photonic qubits, New J. of Phys., 26, 08311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Saglamyurek, J

    E. Saglamyurek, J. Jin, V.B. Verma, M.D. Shaw, et al., Nat. Photon.9, 83 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Bustard, K.B

    P.J. Bustard, K.B. Fisher, C. Hnatovsky, D. Grobnic, et al., Toward a Quantum Memory in a Fiber Cavity Controlled by Intracavity Frequency Translation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 120501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Xiong, X

    C. Xiong, X. Zhang, Z. Liu, M.J. Collins, et al., Active temporal multiplexing of indistinguishable heralded single photons, Nat. Commun. 7, 10853 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Wolters, G

    J. Wolters, G. Buser, A. Horsley, L. Beguin, et al., Simple Atomic Quantum Memory Suitable for Semiconductor Quantum Dot Single Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 060502 (2017). 13

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Bouillard, G

    M. Bouillard, G. Boucher, J.F. Ortas, B. Pointard, and R.T. Brouri, Quan- tum Storage of Single-Photon and Two-Photon Fock States with an All-Optical Quantum Memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 210501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Makino, Y

    K. Makino, Y. Hashimoto, J.-ichi Yoshikawa, H. Ohdan, T. Toyama, et al., Syn- chronization of optical photons for quantum information processing, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501772 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Meyer-Scott, N

    E. Meyer-Scott, N. Prasannan, I. Dhand, C. Eigner, et al., Scalable Generation of Multiphoton Entangled States by Active Feed-Forward and Multiplexing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Herriott, H

    D. Herriott, H. Kogelnik, and R. Kompfner, Off-axis paths in spherical mirror interferometers, App. Opt., 3, 523–526 (1964)

    work page 1964

  33. [33]

    Herriott, and H.J

    D.R. Herriott, and H.J. Schulte, App. Opt. 4, 883–891 (1964)

    work page 1964

  34. [34]

    Robert, Simple, stable, and compact multiple-reflection optical cell for very long optical paths, Applied Optics, 46, 5408–5418 (2007)

    C. Robert, Simple, stable, and compact multiple-reflection optical cell for very long optical paths, Applied Optics, 46, 5408–5418 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Arnold, C.P

    N.T. Arnold, C.P. Lualdi, M.E. Goggin, and P.G. Kwiat, All-optical Quantum Memory, Proc. of SPIE, 12911, 129111C-1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Kaneda, B

    F. Kaneda, B. G. Christensen, J. J. Wong, K. T. McCusker, et al., Time- multiplexed heralded single-photon source, Optica 2, 1010 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Kaneda, and P.G

    F. Kaneda, and P.G. Kwiat, High-efficiency single-photon generation via large- scale active time multiplexing, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw8586 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Q. Xue, L. Peng, Z. Xin, T. Chen, K. Yang, J. Zuo, and J. He, Generalized design of simple, stable and compact nested multipass cells with a reentrant symmetric concentric circle pattern, Opt. Exp., 31, 4152–4166 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    P. Wang, S. Baek, K. Edamatsu, and F. Kaneda, Low-loss polarization- maintaining optical router for photonic quantum information processing, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 040901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    C.J. Boon, D. Prato, and A. Ling, Highly nondegenerate polarization-entangled photon pairs produced through noncritical phasematching in single-domain KTiOPO4, arXiv:2502.18752 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    I. L. Chuang, and M. A. Nielsen, Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of quantum black box, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455 (1997)

    work page 1997

  42. [42]

    James, P.G

    D.F.V. James, P.G. Kwiat, J.W. Munro, and A.G. White, Measurement of qubits, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001). 14

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    White, D.F.V

    A.G. White, D.F.V. James, J.W. Munro, and P.G. Kwiat, Exploring Hilbert space: Accurate characterization of quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012301 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    Munro, D.F.V

    J.W. Munro, D.F.V. James, A.G. White, and P.G. Kwiat, Maximizing the entanglement of two mixed qubits, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030302 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Feng, D.M

    S. Feng, D.M. Kane, and J. Munch, Optical resonators with Herriott-type multipass configurations, J. Opt. Soc. of Am. A, 18, 2158–2167 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    B. Fang, N. Yang, W. Zhao, C. Wang, et al., Improved spherical mirror multipass-cell-based interband cascade laser spectrometer for detecting ambient formaldehyde at parts per trillion by volume levels, App. Opt., 58, 8743–8750 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Clemmen, A

    S. Clemmen, A. Farsi, S. Ramelow, and A. L. Gaeta, All-optically tunable buffer for single photons, Opt. Lett. 43, 2138 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Pang, A.-L

    X.-L. Pang, A.-L. Yang, J.-P. Dou, H. Li, et al., A hybrid quantum mem- ory–enabled network at room temperature, Sci. Adv. 6, eaax1425 (2020). 15

    work page 2020