Competing Dirac masses in one dimension: Symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition and deconfined criticality

Manuel Weber

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Competing Dirac masses in one dimension: Symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition and deconfined criticality

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The CDW–BOW transition in the 1D SSH-Holstein model is a symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition in the adiabatic limit and becomes a deconfined quantum critical point when phonon quantum fluctuations are included.

desk verdict A solid adiabatic-limit analysis of a new pseudo-first-order transition, with a plausible but not fully nailed-down deconfined-criticality claim that should go to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02705 v1 pith:5VIV4ODZ submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

Manuel Weber This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

keywords deconfinedquantumcriticalitypseudo-first-ordertransitionemergentsymmetrycharge-densitywavebond-orderelectron-phononcouplingLuttingerliquidMonteCarlo

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the charge-density-wave to bond-order-wave transition in the one-dimensional SSH-Holstein model is a tunable order-to-order transition whose apparent nature depends on phonon frequency. In the classical (adiabatic) limit, the low-energy Dirac theory predicts a direct first-order transition with an emergent chiral U(1) symmetry; exact quantum Monte Carlo confirms that on intermediate length scales the order-parameter histogram forms a perfect circle and the cumulants scale like a first-order transition. The true thermodynamic ground state, however, is a narrow coexistence phase in which both order parameters are finite, so the apparent discontinuity is a symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition—a crossover phenomenon, not the asymptotic behavior. Adding quantum lattice fluctuations shrinks that coexistence phase and eventually restores a single deconfined quantum critical point with the same emergent U(1) symmetry. A sympathetic reader cares because this gives a controlled one-dimensional setting where deconfined criticality and its pseudo-first-order counterpart are two ends of one tuning parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-component Dirac mass vector $\boldsymbol{\Delta} = (\Delta_{\mathrm{CDW}}, \Delta_{\mathrm{BOW}})$, formed by the site and bond Peierls gaps, whose low-energy Hamiltonian $H_k = \tilde{\epsilon}(k)\tau_z + \Delta_{\mathrm{CDW}}\tau_x - \Delta_{\mathrm{BOW}}\sin(k)\tau_y$ has two anticommuting mass terms. When the phonon potential depends only on $|\boldsymbol{\Delta}|$, arbitrary rotations between CDW and BOW cost no energy, giving the chiral U(1) symmetry; the ratio $\delta E/|\Delta|$—the tiny energy splitting of that manifold compared with the gap—controls how long the enhanced symmetry survives before the lattice's weak U(1) breaking takes over. At finite $\omega_0$, the charge sector is a sine-Gordon model with Luttinger parameter $K_\rho$, and the deconfined critical point is the Gaussian point where the Umklapp cosine is tuned away for $1/4 < K_\rho < 1$. The numerical workhorse is a directed-loop quantum Monte Carlo method for retarded electron-phonon interactions, used to build histograms of the phonon order parameters and the U(1)-sensitive cumulants $F^4_2$ and $F^4_4$.

What would settle it

Run the same quantum Monte Carlo at $\omega_0/t = 0.5$ and $\lambda_s = 0.3$ for $L > 42$ and extract $K_\rho(L) = \pi S_\rho(2\pi/L)/(2\pi/L)$; if $K_\rho$ falls below $1/4$, the claimed deconfined critical point is replaced by a gapped or first-order transition. At $\omega_0 = 0$, the pseudo-first-order claim would fail if the circular order-parameter histogram survives at $L \gg 82$ rather than splitting into the two finite-angle peaks of the mixed phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the adiabatic limit $\omega_0 \to 0$ the model is exactly solvable at mean-field level: the two Peierls order parameters appear as anticommuting Dirac masses that, at equal couplings, describe a chiral U(1)-symmetric manifold of degenerate ground states. Nonlinear lattice effects weakly break that U(1): the exact phase diagram contains a very narrow CDW+BOW mixed phase between two second-order transitions, with an energy splitting $\delta E \sim 10^{-6}t$ that is orders of magnitude smaller than the single-particle gap $|\Delta| \approx 0.234t$. This separation of scales makes the transition look first-order with full U(1) enhancement on accessible system sizes, with cumulant collapses consistent with the discontinuity-fixed-point exponent $1/\nu = 2$, even though the true thermodynamic limit is two continuous transitions. For $\omega_0/t = 0.5$ and $\lambda_s = 0.3$ the charge Luttinger parameter reaches $K_\rho \approx 0.7$, the charge gap closes, and the same order-parameter cumulants now obey the continuous deconfined-critical scaling $1/\nu = 2 - 2K_\rho$; the authors interpret this as a one-dimensional deconfined quantum critical point with emergent chiral U(1) symmetry. Increasing $\omega_0$ continuously shrinks the intermediate phase, so phonon frequency tunes between the two regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The deconfined-criticality claim assumes that the charge stiffness $K_\rho$ stays above $1/4$ in the thermodynamic limit (the simulations reach $K_\rho \approx 0.7$ at $L \le 42$); if larger systems push $K_\rho$ below $1/4$, the Umklapp term becomes relevant and the transition would be gapped or first-order instead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At $\omega_0 \to 0$ the asymptotic ground state is a narrow CDW+BOW coexistence phase, not a direct first-order transition; any calculation that stops at $L \approx 82$ will misidentify it as discontinuous.
The same model at $\omega_0/t = 0.5$ and $\lambda_s = 0.3$ realizes a deconfined quantum critical point where charge and bond correlations share the same power-law decay $r^{-K_\rho}$ with $K_\rho \approx 0.7$, and the emergent U(1) symmetry appears in the order-parameter cumulants.
Phonon frequency acts as a tuning knob: increasing $\omega_0$ narrows the coexistence window and restores chiral U(1), so deconfined criticality and pseudo-first-order behavior are connected by a single parameter rather than being unrelated phenomena.
The observed $K_\rho \approx 0.7$ at the critical point implies a wide window $1/4 < K_\rho < 1$, consistent with a stable Gaussian critical point; if $K_\rho$ ever fell below $1/4$, the transition would split into two transitions bounding a mixed phase, a scenario the authors suggest may occur in the 1D extended Hubbard model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper identifies the endpoints of the tuning but not the location of the crossover line in $(\omega_0, \lambda_s)$ where the coexistence width extrapolates to zero; a systematic finite-size study of $\delta\lambda_b(\omega_0)$ would map the boundary between pseudo-first-order and genuine deconfined criticality.
The near-degenerate U(1) manifold in the adiabatic limit suggests that even inside the mixed phase there should be slow, low-energy order-parameter fluctuations resembling a pseudo-Goldstone mode; measuring the dynamical susceptibility of the two order parameters as a function of $\omega_0$ would test whether this soft mode survives the restoration of U(1).
Because the mechanism is generic for Dirac systems with two anticommuting masses, the same pseudo-first-order phenomenon should appear in higher-dimensional Dirac fermion systems and in classical anisotropic O(2) models with cubic anisotropy; those systems could be checked for the same $\delta E \ll |\Delta|$ separation of energy scales.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: this is the first paper I've seen that cleanly connects pseudocriticality to its first-order counterpart by tuning phonon frequency, and the adiabatic-limit analysis is genuinely solid. The deconfined-criticality claim is plausible but less airtight; the Kρ extrapolation needs a sharper statement.

The genuinely new thing is the symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition. The exact mean-field solution for ω0→0 is clean: the Dirac theory with anticommuting masses predicts a U(1)-symmetric first-order transition, and the lattice's weak breaking of that symmetry produces a narrow coexistence phase with an exponentially small energy splitting. That separation of scales is what makes the pseudo-first-order behavior observable, and the QMC histograms showing a circular distribution of the order parameter are convincing. The cumulant collapses with 1/ν=2 for the adiabatic limit are fine, and the F4 data behaving as the theory predicts is a good sign. The model choice is also smart: the same couplings that generate the two competing orders give you a tunable knob (ω0) to move between regimes.

Where I'd push back a little: the stress-test note worries that Kρ≈0.7 is only shown up to L≤42. I don't think that's accurate—Fig. 4(c) appears to show Kρ(L) beyond that, and Fig. 5 uses L up to 162. But the paper never states the largest L in Fig. 4(c), gives no error bars, and the statement "previous QMC only reached L≤42" is ambiguous about what the new data add. That is a genuine soft spot: the DQCP exists only if Kρ stays above 1/4 in the thermodynamic limit, and the collapse with fixed Kρ≈0.7 doesn't by itself rule out a slow downward drift. This is a fair referee question, not a fatal flaw. The charge and bond correlation decays in Fig. 5(a,b) do support a power law, but again with the same Kρ input.

Another minor point: no code or data are provided. That's a reproducibility limitation, not a correctness issue, but for a single-author Letter with a new claim, the community would benefit from the histograms and raw correlation data.

Bottom line: the paper deserves a serious referee. The conceptual contribution is real, the adiabatic-limit analysis is solid, and the DQCP claim is worth testing further rather than dismissing. I'd send it to review and ask for explicit Kρ(L) values with error bars, a statement of the largest L, and ideally the raw data.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the one-dimensional SSH-Holstein model at half-filling with competing Holstein (site) and SSH (bond) electron-phonon couplings, which generate CDW and BOW order. The central claim is that the CDW–BOW transition can be tuned by the phonon frequency ω0: in the classical limit ω0→0 the low-energy Dirac theory predicts a direct first-order transition with emergent chiral U(1) symmetry, while the lattice model actually hosts a narrow intermediate phase with both orders present, separated by a very small energy scale δE from the U(1)-symmetric manifold. The paper argues that this separation of scales produces a symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition visible on intermediate length scales, with finite-size scaling of the order-parameter histograms consistent with a discontinuity fixed point (1/ν=2). For finite ω0, quantum lattice fluctuations reduce the width of the intermediate phase and eventually restore the U(1) symmetry, yielding a deconfined quantum critical point at ω0/t=0.5, λs=0.3, characterized by a gapless charge mode with Luttinger parameter Kρ≈0.7 and correlation-function collapses with 1/ν=2−2Kρ. The paper combines an exact mean-field solution in the adiabatic limit with large-scale directed-loop QMC simulations and includes an appendix showing the equivalence of electron and phonon order-parameter cumulants.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a tunable one-dimensional realization of deconfined criticality and introduces the conceptually interesting counterpart of pseudocriticality, namely a symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition. The exact mean-field solution in the ω0→0 limit is a genuine strength: it is derived from the model rather than assumed, and it explains the tiny intermediate phase and the separation of energy scales δE≪|Δ| in a parameter-free way. The QMC histograms and cumulant collapses are compared explicitly against this mean-field benchmark, which gives the numerical analysis a solid grounding. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction (the dependence of the transition on Kρ and the relevance condition Kρ=1/4), and the claimed crossover scenario is physically plausible. The main significance rests on the existence of the deconfined critical point at finite ω0, which requires a delicate extrapolation of the Luttinger parameter; this is the part that needs the most scrutiny.

major comments (2)

[Deconfined quantum criticality, Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 5] The deconfined critical point at ω0/t=0.5, λs=0.3 depends on the charge Luttinger parameter remaining above 1/4 in the thermodynamic limit. The paper estimates Kρ≈0.7 from L≤42 (Fig. 4(c)), citing previous QMC that reached only these sizes, and gives no error bars and no larger-L values. The correlation-function decays in Figs. 5(a,b) are compared with the fixed decay L^{-0.7}, so they do not independently determine Kρ∞. A downward drift of Kρ∞ to ≤1/4 would make the 8kF Umklapp cosine in Hρ relevant, gapping the charge sector and turning the transition into a gapped or first-order one, invalidating the central deconfined-criticality claim. This extrapolation is load-bearing and should be substantiated, for instance by direct larger-scale Kρ(L) data, a systematic finite-size scaling analysis of the Kρ estimator, or an independent probe of the charge gap closing at the critical coupling.
[Pseudo-first-order transition, Fig. 3(d,e)] The data collapse using 1/ν=2 is presented as evidence for a discontinuity fixed point, but the paper itself notes that 1/ν=2 is also the mean-field exponent of the two second-order transitions into the intermediate phase. Since the thermodynamic limit at ω0=0 is the intermediate phase rather than a direct first-order transition, the collapse alone does not discriminate between proximity to those mean-field transitions and a genuine discontinuity fixed point. The paper argues that the mixed state requires F_4^4→−4, which is not observed at λs=0.3, but this is a negative statement about the length scales reached rather than a positive demonstration of the fixed point. Please clarify the logical status of the collapse: is it a consistency check of the crossover regime, or is it claimed as evidence that a discontinuity fixed point controls the intermediate-scale behavior?

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] There are several typographical and formatting issues, including 'Institut f¨ ur' (the umlaut is rendered incorrectly), 'exhbit' in the Exact ground state section, and the missing tilde in 'λp±' in the same section. These should be corrected.
[Fig. 2(d)] The caption and text state that |Δ|, δλb, and δE exhibit exp(−a/λs) behavior, but the figure axis is plotted as a function of 1/λs without showing the exponential form. A line or label indicating the expected exponential trend would increase clarity.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 shows Kρ(L) without error bars. Given that the deconfined-criticality claim hinges on the value of Kρ, adding error bars or at least stating the statistical uncertainty in the caption would be helpful.
[Stability of the mixed phase] The statement that 'available systems are still too small to converge to the exact mean-field prediction' is an honest admission of a limitation, but the reader would benefit from a quantitative estimate of how the correlation ratios approach 1 and what system sizes would be needed to see the convergence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mean-field solution and QMC analysis are self-contained, with scaling exponents from external theory and no fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The omega0->0 mean-field solution is obtained by minimizing the exact phonon potential (Eq. 4) after the phonons are integrated out, and the Dirac form (Eq. 3) follows by linearizing the resulting single-particle Hamiltonian around the Fermi points; it is not assumed as an input. The chiral U(1) symmetry at lambda_s=lambda_b follows directly from H_ph proportional to |Delta|^2 in the paper's own equations, and the intermediate phase appears from the nonlinear band dispersion in the same exact solution, so the pseudo-first-order scenario is not presupposed. The QMC histograms are benchmarked against the mean-field gap in the adiabatic limit; the prefactors in Eqs. (8) and (14) are chosen so that the circle radius matches the gap, but the circular shape and angular uniformity - the actual evidence for enhanced symmetry - are not forced by that normalization. The scaling exponents are taken from external theory: 1/nu=2 from discontinuity-fixed-point scaling [33,34] and 1/nu=2-2K_rho from bosonization [18]; neither is fitted to force the collapse. K_rho(L) is a measured charge-structure-factor estimator on the same model, and using K_rho=0.7 in the collapse is a self-consistency check rather than a circular reduction, since an incorrect K_rho would spoil the collapse. The finite-size extrapolation K_rho=0.7 at L<=42 as an approximation to the thermodynamic limit is a correctness/uncertainty concern about the deconfined-criticality claim, not a definitional circularity; the paper does not define the DQCP in terms of the measured K_rho. Self-citations [23,57] support the QMC method and are backed by exact-limit benchmarks within this paper, so they are not load-bearing circular citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard bosonization and Luttinger-liquid description, the exactness of the classical-phonon mean-field solution, and estimator relations from the author's previous method papers. These are standard within the field and none are ad hoc to the paper's result. The model parameters are scanned, not fitted.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The low-energy sector is described by a (1+1)D Dirac Hamiltonian with anticommuting masses ΔCDW τx and ΔBOW sin(k)τy, giving a chiral U(1) symmetry when λs=λb.
Used to derive the direct first-order transition and the order-parameter circle; enters after Eq. (3) when expanding around kF=±π/2.
domain assumption For ω0 to 0 with L,β to infinity, phonon displacements become classical and the mean-field solution is exact.
Basis of the 'exact ground state in the adiabatic phonon limit' section; used to compute δE, δλb, and the phase diagram in Fig. 2.
domain assumption The charge sector of the 1D system is described by a sine-Gordon model Hρ, with the Umklapp cosine relevant for Kρ<1 and a Gaussian critical point for 1/4<Kρ<1 at λρ=0.
Used to interpret Kρ(L) and the deconfined critical point at ω0/t=0.5; standard bosonization result quoted from Refs. 18, 38, 39.
domain assumption The phonon order-parameter cumulants are related to electronic cumulants by Eqs. (10)-(17), with corrections suppressed at large L and β.
Justifies computing ΔCDW and ΔBOW histograms from electronic world-line configurations in QMC; derived in the appendix using Ref. 57.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Competing Dirac masses in one dimension: Symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition and deconfined criticality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5VIV4ODZ

@misc{pith2026250902705,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Competing Dirac masses in one dimension: Symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition and deconfined criticality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5VIV4ODZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02705}
}

abstract

Emergent symmetries and slow crossover phenomena are central themes in quantum criticality and manifest themselves in the pseudocritical scaling experienced in the context of deconfined criticality. Here we discover its conceptual counterpart, i.e., a symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition. It emerges from a one-dimensional realization of deconfined criticality between charge- and bond-ordered states driven by competing Holstein and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger electron-phonon couplings, for which quantum fluctuations and thereby the nature of the transition can be tuned systematically via the phonon frequency $\omega_0$. In the classical limit $\omega_0 \to 0$, a low-energy Dirac theory predicts a direct first-order transition with emergent U(1) symmetry. Using exact quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we provide strong evidence for symmetry enhancement and even finite-size scaling on intermediate length scales but in the thermodynamic limit it turns into a narrow intermediate phase where both order parameters are finite, as chiral U(1) symmetry is weakly broken on the lattice. Including quantum lattice fluctuations diminishes the width of the intermediate phase, gradually restores the U(1) symmetry, and eventually tunes the system to a deconfined quantum critical point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02705 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Ground-state properties for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Quantum-lattice-fluctuation effects at fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Symmetry-enhanced pseudo-first-order transition at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effects of quantum lattice fluctuations on the inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

Senthil, A

T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points, Science 303, 1490 (2004)

2004
[2]

Senthil, L

T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the Landau- Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144407 (2004)

work page 2004
[3]

A. W. Sandvik, Evidence for Deconfined Quantum Crit- icality in a Two-Dimensional Heisenberg Model with Four-Spin Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227202 (2007)

work page 2007
[4]

Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023), arXiv:2306.12638

T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023), arXiv:2306.12638

arXiv 2023
[5]

Nahum, P

A. Nahum, P. Serna, J. T. Chalker, M. Ortu˜ no, and A. M. Somoza, Emergent SO(5) Symmetry at the N´ eel to Valence-Bond-Solid Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267203 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

B. Zhao, P. Weinberg, and A. W. Sandvik, Symmetry- enhanced discontinuous phase transition in a two- dimensional quantum magnet, Nature Physics 15, 678 (2019)

2019
[7]

Serna and A

P. Serna and A. Nahum, Emergence and spontaneous breaking of approximate O(4) symmetry at a weakly first-order deconfined phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195110 (2019)

2019
[8]

Takahashi and A

J. Takahashi and A. W. Sandvik, Valence-bond solids, vestigial order, and emergent SO(5) symmetry in a two- dimensional quantum magnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033459 (2020)

work page 2020

Show all 57 references

[9]

Nahum, J

A. Nahum, J. T. Chalker, P. Serna, M. Ortu˜ no, and A. M. Somoza, Deconfined Quantum Criticality, Scaling Viola- tions, and Classical Loop Models, Phys. Rev. X5, 041048 (2015)

2015
[10]

C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: Sym- metries and Dualities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031051 (2017)

2017
[11]

Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys

A. Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 201116 (2020)

2020
[12]

Ma and C

R. Ma and C. Wang, Theory of deconfined pseudocriti- 6 cality, Phys. Rev. B 102, 020407 (2020)

2020
[13]

Takahashi, H

J. Takahashi, H. Shao, B. Zhao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, SO(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quan- tum magnets (2024), arXiv:2405.06607

2024 arXiv
[14]

Jiang and O

S. Jiang and O. Motrunich, Ising ferromagnet to valence bond solid transition in a one-dimensional spin chain: Analogies to deconfined quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B 99, 075103 (2019)

2019
[15]

Roberts, S

B. Roberts, S. Jiang, and O. I. Motrunich, Deconfined quantum critical point in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165143 (2019)

2019
[16]

Mudry, A

C. Mudry, A. Furusaki, T. Morimoto, and T. Hikihara, Quantum phase transitions beyond Landau-Ginzburg theory in one-dimensional space revisited, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205153 (2019)

2019
[17]

Huang, D.-C

R.-Z. Huang, D.-C. Lu, Y.-Z. You, Z. Y. Meng, and T. Xi- ang, Emergent symmetry and conserved current at a one- dimensional incarnation of deconfined quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125137 (2019)

2019
[18]

A. W. Sandvik, L. Balents, and D. K. Campbell, Ground State Phases of the Half-Filled One-Dimensional Ex- tended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 236401 (2004)

2004
[19]

Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I

T. Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I. The molecular-crystal model, Annals of Physics8, 325 (1959)

1959
[20]

W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

1979
[21]

Hohenadler and H

M. Hohenadler and H. Fehske, Density waves in strongly correlated quantum chains, European Physical Journal B 91, 204 (2018), arXiv:1706.00470 [cond-mat.str-el]

2018 arXiv
[22]

Hohenadler, Interplay of Site and Bond Electron- Phonon Coupling in One Dimension, Phys

M. Hohenadler, Interplay of Site and Bond Electron- Phonon Coupling in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 206404 (2016)

2016
[23]

Weber, F

M. Weber, F. F. Assaad, and M. Hohenadler, Directed- Loop Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Retarded Inter- actions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 097401 (2017)

2017
[24]

A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B 59, R14157 (1999)

1999
[25]

O. F. Sylju˚ asen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002)

2002
[26]

See Appendix for details on retarded interactions and how we calculate the phonon order parameters
[27]

R. P. Hardikar and R. T. Clay, Phase diagram of the one- dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model at half and quarter filling, Phys. Rev. B 75, 245103 (2007)

2007
[28]

Hohenadler and T

M. Hohenadler and T. C. Lang, Autocorrelations in Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of Electron-Phonon Models, in Computational Many-Particle Physics , edited by H. Fehske, R. Schneider, and A. Weiße (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 357–366

2008
[29]

Note that our optical bond phonons only differ from the original acoustic SSH phonons [20] in an additional renor- malization of the electron hopping via tb
[30]

S. Ryu, C. Mudry, C.-Y. Hou, and C. Chamon, Masses in graphenelike two-dimensional electronic systems: Topo- logical defects in order parameters and their fractional exchange statistics, Phys. Rev. B 80, 205319 (2009)

2009
[31]

Goldstone and F

J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Fractional Quantum Num- bers on Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 986 (1981)

1981
[32]

Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , 2nd ed

E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

2013
[33]

Nienhuis and M

B. Nienhuis and M. Nauenberg, First-Order Phase Tran- sitions in Renormalization-Group Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 477 (1975)

1975
[34]

M. E. Fisher and A. N. Berker, Scaling for first-order phase transitions in thermodynamic and finite systems, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2507 (1982)

1982
[35]

Kivelson, Solitons with adjustable charge in a commen- surate Peierls insulator, Phys

S. Kivelson, Solitons with adjustable charge in a commen- surate Peierls insulator, Phys. Rev. B 28, 2653 (1983)

1983
[36]

Rossler and D

J. Rossler and D. Gottlieb, Competition between charge and bond waves in a Peierls-Hubbard model, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2, 3723 (1990)

1990
[37]

Zhao and S

S. Zhao and S. A. Kivelson, Solitons with irrational charge in a one-dimensional quantum ferroelectric (2024), arXiv:2406.11952

2024 arXiv
[38]

Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

2003
[39]

F. D. M. Haldane, Spontaneous dimerization in the S = 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain with competing in- teractions, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4925 (1982)

1982
[40]

Weber, F

M. Weber, F. Parisen Toldin, and M. Hohenadler, Com- peting orders and unconventional criticality in the Su- Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023013 (2020)

2020
[41]

Weber, Intermediate bond-order-wave phase and nature of the order-to-order transition in the one-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model (2024), arXiv:2412.13263

M. Weber, Intermediate bond-order-wave phase and nature of the order-to-order transition in the one-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model (2024), arXiv:2412.13263

2024 arXiv
[42]

Roy and I

B. Roy and I. F. Herbut, Unconventional superconduc- tivity on honeycomb lattice: Theory of Kekule order pa- rameter, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035429 (2010)

2010
[43]

T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, and F. F. Assaad, Dirac Fermions with Competing Orders: Non-Landau Tran- sition with Emergent Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 197203 (2017)

2017
[44]

Torres, L

E. Torres, L. Weber, L. Janssen, S. Wessel, and M. M. Scherer, Emergent symmetries and coexisting orders in Dirac fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022005 (2020)

2020
[45]

Zhang, A Unified Theory Based on SO(5) Symme- try of Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism, Sci- ence 275, 1089 (1997)

S.-C. Zhang, A Unified Theory Based on SO(5) Symme- try of Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism, Sci- ence 275, 1089 (1997)

1997
[46]

Demler, W

E. Demler, W. Hanke, and S.-C. Zhang, SO(5) theory of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 909 (2004)

2004
[47]

Pelissetto and E

A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory, Physics Reports 368, 549 (2002)

2002
[48]

Calabrese, A

P. Calabrese, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Multicritical phenomena in O(n1) L O(n2)-symmetric theories, Phys. Rev. B 67, 054505 (2003)

2003
[49]

S. Yang, Z. Pan, D.-C. Lu, and X.-J. Yu, Emergent self- duality in a long-range critical spin chain: From decon- fined criticality to first-order transition, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245152 (2023)

2023
[50]

Prellberg and A

T. Prellberg and A. L. Owczarek, Four-dimensional poly- mer collapse: Pseudo-first-order transition in interacting self-avoiding walks, Phys. Rev. E 62, 3780 (2000)

2000
[51]

Schreiber and J

N. Schreiber and J. Adler, Monte Carlo study of the pure and dilute Baxter–Wu model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 38, 7253 (2005)

2005
[52]

Lundow and K

P. Lundow and K. Markstr¨ om, Non-vanishing bound- ary effects and quasi-first-order phase transitions in high dimensional Ising models, Nuclear Physics B 845, 120 (2011)

2011
[53]

S. Jin, A. Sen, and A. W. Sandvik, Ashkin-Teller Criti- cality and Pseudo-First-Order Behavior in a Frustrated 7 Ising Model on the Square Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045702 (2012)

2012
[54]

A. D. Bruce and A. Aharony, Coupled order parameters, symmetry-breaking irrelevant scaling fields, and tetra- critical points, Phys. Rev. B 11, 478 (1975)

1975
[55]

Domany and M

E. Domany and M. E. Fisher, Equations of state for bi- critical points. III. Cubic anisotropy and tetracriticality, Phys. Rev. B 15, 3510 (1977)

1977
[56]

https://www.nhr-verein.de/unsere-partner
[57]

Weber, F

M. Weber, F. F. Assaad, and M. Hohenadler, Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo for fermion- boson lattice models: Improved bosonic estimators and application to the Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245138 (2016). Appendix Retarded interactions.—As the phonons appear only quadr...

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Senthil, A

T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points, Science 303, 1490 (2004)

2004

[2] [2]

Senthil, L

T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the Landau- Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144407 (2004)

work page 2004

[3] [3]

A. W. Sandvik, Evidence for Deconfined Quantum Crit- icality in a Two-Dimensional Heisenberg Model with Four-Spin Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227202 (2007)

work page 2007

[4] [4]

Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023), arXiv:2306.12638

T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023), arXiv:2306.12638

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

Nahum, P

A. Nahum, P. Serna, J. T. Chalker, M. Ortu˜ no, and A. M. Somoza, Emergent SO(5) Symmetry at the N´ eel to Valence-Bond-Solid Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267203 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

B. Zhao, P. Weinberg, and A. W. Sandvik, Symmetry- enhanced discontinuous phase transition in a two- dimensional quantum magnet, Nature Physics 15, 678 (2019)

2019

[7] [7]

Serna and A

P. Serna and A. Nahum, Emergence and spontaneous breaking of approximate O(4) symmetry at a weakly first-order deconfined phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195110 (2019)

2019

[8] [8]

Takahashi and A

J. Takahashi and A. W. Sandvik, Valence-bond solids, vestigial order, and emergent SO(5) symmetry in a two- dimensional quantum magnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033459 (2020)

work page 2020