Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 151 references

Control across scales: signals, information, and adaptive biological mechanical function

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that control and information theory can quantitatively connect molecular-scale nonequilibrium activity to macroscopic biological mechanical function, spanning timescales from reflexes to evolution.

desk verdict A clearly written control-theory perspective whose qualitative synthesis is useful, but whose only quantitative bridge rests on a misapplied Landauer bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03418 v1 pith:4UZRGHNC submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.soft nlin.AOphysics.bio-ph

James Clarke , Jake McGrath , Colin Johnson , José Alvarado This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softnlin.AOphysics.bio-ph
keywords controltheoryinformationbiologicalmechanicsfeedbackstochasticthermodynamicsactivematterrobophysicsadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that control theory provides a unifying framework for biological mechanics: the same mathematics used to regulate engineered systems—feedforward commands, feedback from sensors, and adaptive updating of controller parameters—describes how cells, muscles, organisms, populations, and evolving species keep functioning far from equilibrium. Its central claim is that control and information theory can quantitatively connect microscopic nonequilibrium molecular activity to macroscopic phenomenological mechanical function, and connect short task timescales to evolutionary ones. The authors survey molecular motors, intracellular signaling, muscle activation, animal locomotion, robophysics, population dynamics, and medical and space-engineering applications to show the same loop structure recurring at each scale. If the claim is right, biological mechanical behavior becomes not an unstructured consequence of physical law but a set of regulation problems solvable by common control-theoretic tools.

What carries the argument

The central object is the closed control loop: controller K, plant G, control signal u(t), and sensory measurement y(t). Around this loop the paper organizes all scales; the quantitative bridge is supplied by the Landauer bound (minimum heat kT ln2 per erased bit) and bipartite stochastic-thermodynamics descriptions of entropy production and mutual information, used to compute information rates from metabolic dissipation.

What would settle it

Measure the mutual information between an applied mechanical or chemical stimulus and a cell's contractile output under repeated identical trials; if the sustained information rate exceeds the cell's entropy-production budget, or if no finite-order controller can reproduce the measured input-output map, the claimed quantitative bridge fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper proposes that a controller K issuing control signals u(t) to a physical system G, with sensors returning outputs y(t) to close the loop, is the common architecture underlying biological mechanical function from molecular to organismal scales. It claims that this architecture, together with information-theoretic quantities, allows quantitative connections: entropy production constrains information processing, and metabolic free-energy dissipation can be converted into an upper bound on the rate of mutual-information extraction—roughly 10^9 bits per second for an average human cell. The paper then extends the same control picture upward in timescale: adaptive control models robustnes

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the premise that biological systems genuinely instantiate a control loop—a controller, a plant, and information-bearing sensory feedback—rather than merely being describable as if they did; the cell-scale information-rate estimate additionally assumes Landauer's bound applies to whole-cell information processing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, experiments on molecular motors, cells, and animals can share the same control-theoretic vocabulary, so insights from one scale transfer to another.
  • Metabolic entropy production becomes a measurable budget for biological computation: the paper's estimate gives an upper information-processing rate near 10^9 bits per second for an average cell.
  • Adaptive control offers a quantitative model of population dynamics and evolution as robust adjustment to slow environmental drift, potentially improving predictions where classical models fail.
  • Robophysical systems can test how thermodynamic efficiency, control effort, and information transmission trade off in mechanical tasks, because their internal states and energy use are directly measurable.
  • Framing medical interventions and prosthetics as feedback controllers turns therapy into a closed-loop regulation problem with design rules from control theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's control-loop vocabulary could be tested by asking whether observed sensory histories and actuation signals in single cells admit a consistent input-output controller; if they do not, the framework would remain a metaphor rather than a quantitative description.
  • The 10^9 bit/s estimate suggests a concrete empirical program: measure mutual information between a defined stimulus and a mechanical response in single cells and compare it with the entropy budget.
  • The framework implies a robustness principle—sensing must be fast relative to disturbances—so one could look for cells or organisms that tune their sensing bandwidth to the disturbance spectrum.
  • Treating 'mechanical intelligence' as embodied feedforward control could reconcile self-organization descriptions with control descriptions, making the two complementary rather than competing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is an expository perspective arguing that control theory and information theory provide a unifying framework for biological mechanical function across scales. It introduces feedforward, feedback, and adaptive control architectures, reviews stochastic thermodynamics and a Landauer-based estimate of cellular information processing, discusses robophysical models of locomotion, and extends the framework to population dynamics, evolution, synthetic cells, prosthetics, and space medicine. The abstract and introduction make both a qualitative claim (control theory is a powerful unifying framework) and a quantitative claim (control and information theory can quantitatively connect molecular nonequilibrium activity to macroscopic biological mechanical function). The paper contains no new derivations; its contribution is synthetic and conceptual.

Significance. The qualitative thesis is valuable and timely: it draws together a broad literature and offers a plausible common language for molecular, cellular, organismal, and evolutionary regulation. The authors are commendably candid about limitations: the gigabit-per-second estimate is flagged as likely too generous, robophysical models are acknowledged to be non-biological, and the human-engineering proposal is explicitly described as facing substantial technical and ethical hurdles. These caveats strengthen the paper's credibility. However, the central quantitative claim rests on a single estimate that is derived from an incorrect application of Landauer's principle. Because no other quantitative bridge between molecular parameters and macroscopic control descriptions is supplied, the strongest version of the paper's thesis is currently unsupported. The manuscript is best viewed as a perspective that would be significantly improved by either correcting or carefully softening its quantitative framing.

major comments (2)
  1. The derivation of the 10^9 bit/s estimate is not a valid consequence of Landauer's principle. The text states, 'assuming an upper bound S/k = I/k_s' and obtains I_dot = 10^9 bit/s. Landauer's bound applies to the heat dissipated when a bit is erased, giving S_dot >= k_B ln 2 * R_erase; it does not bound the rate at which a system can extract or transmit mutual information. Measurement and transduction can in principle proceed without erasure, and in autonomous molecular systems the relationship between information flow and entropy production is governed by bipartite fluctuation theorems with model-dependent terms, as the paper itself notes via refs. [80,81]. Thus the estimate is not merely 'likely too generous'; it is derived from the wrong physical quantity. Since this is the only explicit quantitative bridge between molecular entropy production and information-processing rate, the pape
  2. The block-diagram mapping of biological components onto controller K, plant G, sensor output y(t), and control signal u(t) is introduced by analogy, and no system identification or transfer-function-based demonstration is provided. For the quantitative cross-scale claim, it is not enough to assert that intracellular signaling, muscle actuation, and organismal movement 'can be viewed as' control loops; one needs at least one worked example in which molecular-scale parameters are quantitatively connected to a macroscopic controller/plant description. The paper offers several qualitative examples (e.g., RhoA/Rac signaling, stretch-activated channels, spindle reflexes) but no quantitative bridge. This is a load-bearing gap for the quantitative thesis, and it should be addressed by either supplying a worked quantitative case study or explicitly limiting the claim to a qualitative organization
minor comments (4)
  1. The notation 'S/k = I/k_s' is confusing: k is Boltzmann's constant and k_s = log 2 bit, but the equation as written mixes units and does not clearly define the information rate. Please rewrite with explicit definitions and use '≈' or an order-of-magnitude symbol for the 10^9 bit/s result.
  2. The text refers to 'Fig. 1a', but the figure has top/center/bottom rows rather than labeled panels a/b. Please either add panel labels or correct the cross-reference.
  3. The statement that LOCKR protein cages implement 'PID-like logic' is an overstatement; the cited work demonstrates de novo designed protein switches, not proportional-integral-derivative control. Please qualify this claim.
  4. Several typographical and formatting issues need correction: missing spaces before references (e.g., 'Recently, attention has turned toward' and 'e.g. [77]'), 'consumes∼' without a space, and inconsistent use of italics for variables. A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a perspective/review whose central claim is an argument, not a derived prediction; self-citations are supporting examples and the one quantitative estimate is explicitly flagged as an assumption.

full rationale

The paper's central claim ('control theory provides a powerful, unifying framework') is a conceptual argument, not a derivation chain that could collapse into its inputs. The only explicit quantitative bridge is the estimate I-dot = 10^9 bit/s in the 'Control over microscopic activity' section. The paper states: 'Given the 10 fW/K from above, assuming an upper bound ˙S/k = ˙I/k_s (with k Boltzmann's constant and k_s = log 2 bit), we find approx. ˙I = 10^9 bit/s.' This is a unit conversion under an explicitly stated upper-bound assumption, and the authors immediately flag it ('Do cells really process a gigabit of information per second? Although the answer is likely "no"...'). It is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the target result is not built into the premise by definition. Self-citations [25,106,107] are used only as supporting examples: [25] is one of several recent reviews of control approaches, and [106,107] are published robophysical studies illustrating energetic tradeoffs. They are not invoked to justify the unifying thesis, and no uniqueness theorem or shared ansatz is imported from them. The block-diagram mappings (Fig. 1) are explicitly analogical ('Control theory offers a framework to answer this question'), not a derivation. The skeptical concern about Landauer's bound conflating bit erasure with information extraction is a scientific-correctness challenge, not a circularity: the circularity rules require exhibiting a specific reduction of the conclusion to its inputs, and none exists here. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

These axioms are the interpretive scaffolding of the paper. They are not derived from first principles or tested; they are modeling choices that must be accepted to follow the argument. None of them are new physical entities.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Biological regulation can be represented as a control loop with a controller K, plant G, sensor output y(t), and control signal u(t).
    The paper introduces this abstraction in Figure 1 and applies it to intracellular signaling, muscle action, and animal locomotion, assuming these blocks faithfully capture the causal structure of the biological processes.
  • ad hoc to paper The entropy production rate of a cell sets an upper bound on its information processing rate via I dot <= S dot / (k log 2).
    Used in the section on stochastic thermodynamics to estimate 10^9 bit/s. This applies Landauer's principle to a whole cell, an extrapolation that assumes all entropy production is available for information processing, which the paper itself acknowledges is doubtful.
  • domain assumption Life can be viewed as an entropy-maximizing process, providing a non-equilibrium analog to the second law.
    Invoked to discuss dissipation and optimization in biological systems, though the paper notes the apparent tension with minimizing energy dissipation.
  • domain assumption Adaptive control concepts, such as gain adjustment and robust adaptation, apply to population dynamics and evolution.
    The paper proposes that Lotka-Volterra models could be improved by treating population parameters as adaptively updated, assuming evolutionary and ecological processes are analogous to adaptive controller tuning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Control across scales: signals, information, and adaptive biological mechanical function." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4UZRGHNC

@misc{pith2026250903418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Control across scales: signals, information, and adaptive biological mechanical function},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4UZRGHNC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03418}
}
read the original abstract

Biological systems perform an astonishing array of dynamical processes -- including development and repair, regulation, behavior and motor control, sensing and signaling, and adaptation, among others. Powered by the transduction of stored energy resources, these behaviors enable biological systems to regulate functions, achieve specific outcomes, and maintain stability far from thermodynamic equilibrium. These behaviors span orders of magnitude in length and time: from nanometer-scale molecular motors driving morphogenesis to kilometer-scale seasonal migrations, and from millisecond reflexes to millennia of evolutionary adaptations. While physical laws govern the dynamics of biological systems, they alone are insufficient to fully explain how living systems sense, decide, adapt, and, ultimately, control their dynamics. In this article, we argue that control theory provides a powerful, unifying framework for understanding how biological systems regulate dynamics to maintain stability across length and time scales far from equilibrium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03418 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Essential constituents of functional mechanical behavior. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Control strategies establish mechanical function over distinct timescale ranges. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky.Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1995

  2. [2]

    Schaffer and Trey Ideker

    Leah V . Schaffer and Trey Ideker. Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems. Cell Systems, 12(6):622–635, June 2021. Publisher: Elsevier

    2021

  3. [3]

    Strategies for cellular decision-making.Molecular Systems Biology, 5(1):326, January 2009

    Theodore J Perkins and Peter S Swain. Strategies for cellular decision-making.Molecular Systems Biology, 5(1):326, January 2009. Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    2009

  4. [4]

    Jeffrey D. Schall. Decision making. Current Biology, 15(1):R9–R11, January 2005. Publisher: Elsevier

    2005

  5. [5]

    Physical properties determining self- organization of motors and microtubules

    T Surrey, Franc ¸ois J N´ed´elec, S Leibler, and E Karsenti. Physical properties determining self- organization of motors and microtubules. Science, 292(5519):1167–1171, May 2001

    2001

  6. [6]

    William Bialek, Andrea Cavagna, Irene Giardina, Thierry Mora, Edmondo Silvestri, Massimiliano Viale, and Aleksandra M. Walczak. Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(13):4786–4791, March 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Flocking algorithm for autonomous flying robots

    Csaba Vir ´agh, G ´abor V ´as´arhelyi, Norbert Tarcai, Tam ´as Sz ¨or´enyi, Gerg ˝o Somorjai, Tam ´as Ne- pusz, and Tam ´as Vicsek. Flocking algorithm for autonomous flying robots. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 9(2):025012, May 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    Self-Concentration and Large-Scale Coherence in Bacterial Dynamics

    Christopher Dombrowski, Luis Cisneros, Sunita Chatkaew, Raymond E Goldstein, and John O Kessler. Self-Concentration and Large-Scale Coherence in Bacterial Dynamics. Physical Review Letters, 93(9):098103, August 2004

    2004

Show all 151 references
  1. [9]

    Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer

    Peter Friedl and Darren Gilmour. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, 10(7):445–457, July 2009

    2009

  2. [10]

    Physical Models of Collective Cell Migration

    Ricard Alert and Xavier Trepat. Physical Models of Collective Cell Migration. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11(V olume 11, 2020):77–101, March 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    John R. G. Dyer, Christos C. Ioannou, Lesley J. Morrell, Darren P. Croft, Iain D. Couzin, Dean A. Waters, and Jens Krause. Consensus decision making in human crowds. Animal Behaviour , 75(2):461–470, February 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Intelligence by mechanics

    Reinhard Blickhan, Andre Seyfarth, Hartmut Geyer, Sten Grimmer, Heiko Wagner, and Michael G¨unther. Intelligence by mechanics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 365(1850):199–220, November 2006. Publisher: Ro...

    2006

  5. [13]

    Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologi- cally Inspired Robotics

    Rolf Pfeifer, Max Lungarella, and Fumiya Iida. Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologi- cally Inspired Robotics. Science, 318(5853):1088–1093, November 2007. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 13

    2007

  6. [14]

    Soft Robotics

    Cecilia Laschi. Soft Robotics. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents series. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, September 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    R. J. Full and D. E. Koditschek. Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202(23):3325–3332, December 1999

    1999

  8. [16]

    Shamsan, Benjamin Fuller, Jesse Kasim, M

    Aleksi Isomursu, Keun-Young Park, Jay Hou, Bo Cheng, Mathilde Mathieu, Ghaidan A. Shamsan, Benjamin Fuller, Jesse Kasim, M. Mohsen Mahmoodi, Tian Jian Lu, Guy M. Genin, Feng Xu, Min Lin, Mark D. Distefano, Johanna Ivaska, and David J. Odde. Directed cell migration towards soft...

    2022

  9. [17]

    Cowan, Mert M

    Noah J. Cowan, Mert M. Ankarali, Jonathan P. Dyhr, Manu S. Madhav, Eatai Roth, Shahin Sefati, Simon Sponberg, Sarah A. Stamper, Eric S. Fortune, and Thomas L. Daniel. Feedback Control as a Framework for Understanding Tradeoffs in Biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 5...

    2014

  10. [18]

    Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches

    Rodrigo Quian Quiroga and Stefano Panzeri. Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 10(3):173–185, March 2009. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2009

  11. [19]

    Bourret and Ann M

    Robert B. Bourret and Ann M. Stock. Molecular Information Processing: Lessons from Bacterial Chemotaxis *. Journal of Biological Chemistry , 277(12):9625–9628, March 2002. Publisher: Elsevier

    2002

  12. [20]

    Juan M. R. Parrondo, Jordan M. Horowitz, and Takahiro Sagawa. Thermodynamics of informa- tion. Nature Physics, 11(2):131–139, February 2015. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2015

  13. [21]

    Control Theory for Physicists

    John Bechhoefer. Control Theory for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, April 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Optimal control in stochastic thermodynamics

    Steven Blaber and David A Sivak. Optimal control in stochastic thermodynamics. Journal of Physics Communications, 7(3):033001, March 2023. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2023

  15. [23]

    Takatori, Titus Quah, and James B

    Sho C. Takatori, Titus Quah, and James B. Rawlings. Feedback Control of Active Matter. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , 16(V olume 16, 2025):319–341, March 2025. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2025

  16. [24]

    Herbert Levine and Daniel I. Goldman. Physics of smart active matter: integrating active matter and control to gain insights into living systems. Soft Matter, 19(23):4204–4207, 2023. Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Optimal Control in Soft and Active Matter, April 2025

    Jos ´e Alvarado, Erin Teich, David Sivak, and John Bechhoefer. Optimal Control in Soft and Active Matter, April 2025. arXiv:2504.08676 [cond-mat]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Berridge, Peter Lipp, and Martin D

    Michael J. Berridge, Peter Lipp, and Martin D. Bootman. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 1(1):11–21, October 2000

    2000

  19. [27]

    Schwartz

    James H. Schwartz. The many dimensions of cAMP signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24):13482–13484, November 2001. 14

    2001

  20. [28]

    Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, Keith Roberts, Martin Raff, and Peter Walter. Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science, 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Positional information and patterning revisited

    Lewis Wolpert. Positional information and patterning revisited. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 269(1):359–365, January 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Patrick M ¨uller and Alexander F. Schier. Extracellular Movement of Signaling Molecules. Devel- opmental Cell, 21(1):145–158, July 2011

    2011

  23. [31]

    Scaling of pattern formations and morphogen gradients

    Hidehiko Inomata. Scaling of pattern formations and morphogen gradients. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 59(1):41–51, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Kholodenko

    Boris N. Kholodenko. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7(3):165–176, March 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Lightman and Becky L

    Stafford L. Lightman and Becky L. Conway-Campbell. The crucial role of pulsatile activity of the HPA axis for continuous dynamic equilibration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(10):710–718, October 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    Del Vecchio, C

    A. Del Vecchio, C. M. Germer, L. A. Elias, Q. Fu, J. Fine, M. Santello, and D. Farina. The human central nervous system transmits common synaptic inputs to distinct motor neuron pools during non-synergistic digit actions. The Journal of Physiology, 597(24):5935–5948, 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Bement, Marcin Leda, Alison M

    William M. Bement, Marcin Leda, Alison M. Moe, Angela M. Kita, Matthew E. Larson, Adri- ana E. Golding, Courtney Pfeuti, Kuan-Chung Su, Ann L. Miller, Andrew B. Goryachev, and George von Dassow. Activator–inhibitor coupling between Rho signalling and actin assembly makes the c...

    2015

  28. [36]

    An excitable Rho GTPase sig- naling network generates dynamic subcellular contraction patterns

    Melanie Graessl, Johannes Koch, Abram Calderon, Dominic Kamps, Soumya Banerjee, Tom ´aˇs Mazel, Nina Schulze, Jana Kathrin Jungkurth, Rutuja Patwardhan, Djamschid Solouk, Nico Hampe, Bernd Hoffmann, Leif Dehmelt, and Perihan Nalbant. An excitable Rho GTPase sig- naling network...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Michaux, Franc ¸ois B

    Jonathan B. Michaux, Franc ¸ois B. Robin, William M. McFadden, and Edwin M. Munro. Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.Journal of Cell Biology, 217(12):4230–4252, October 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Berchtold, Heinrich Brinkmeier, and Markus M ¨untener

    Martin W. Berchtold, Heinrich Brinkmeier, and Markus M ¨untener. Calcium Ion in Skeletal Muscle: Its Crucial Role for Muscle Function, Plasticity, and Disease. Physiological Reviews, 80(3):1215–1265, July 2000

    2000

  31. [39]

    Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction

    Richard Sutton and Andrew Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction . The MIT Press, November 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Suraj Shankar, Luca V . D. Scharrer, Mark J. Bowick, and M. Cristina Marchetti. Design rules for controlling active topological defects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 121(21):e2400933121, May 2024. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 15

    2024

  33. [41]

    Goult, Benjamin Klapholz, Xian Hu, Christopher P

    Mingxi Yao, Benjamin T. Goult, Benjamin Klapholz, Xian Hu, Christopher P. Toseland, Yingjian Guo, Peiwen Cong, Michael P. Sheetz, and Jie Yan. The mechanical response of talin. Nature Communications, 7(1):11966, July 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    Fernandez, and Michael P

    Armando del Rio, Raul Perez-Jimenez, Ruchuan Liu, Pere Roca-Cusachs, Julio M. Fernandez, and Michael P. Sheetz. Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding. Science, 323(5914):638–641, January 2009

    2009

  35. [43]

    Cross-regulations of two con- nected domains form a mechanical circuit for steady force transmission during clathrin-mediated endocytosis

    Yuan Ren, Jie Yang, Barbara Fujita, Yongli Zhang, and Julien Berro. Cross-regulations of two con- nected domains form a mechanical circuit for steady force transmission during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Cell Reports, 43(9):114725, September 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    α- Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development

    Shigenobu Yonemura, Yuko Wada, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Akira Nagafuchi, and Mai Shibata. α- Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nature Cell Biology, 12(6):533–542, June 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Earley, Sanjeev Ranade, Matt J

    Bertrand Coste, Jayanti Mathur, Manuela Schmidt, Taryn J. Earley, Sanjeev Ranade, Matt J. Petrus, Adrienne E. Dubin, and Ardem Patapoutian. Piezo1 and Piezo2 Are Essential Compo- nents of Distinct Mechanically Activated Cation Channels. Science, 330(6000):55–60, October 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Ranade, Ruhma Syeda, and Ardem Patapoutian

    Sanjeev S. Ranade, Ruhma Syeda, and Ardem Patapoutian. Mechanically Activated Ion Channels. Neuron, 87(6):1162–1179, September 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Single molecule FRET reveals pore size and opening mechanism of a mechano-sensitive ion channel.eLife, 3:e01834, February 2014

    Yong Wang, Yanxin Liu, Hannah A DeBerg, Takeshi Nomura, Melinda Tonks Hoffman, Paul R Rohde, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac, and Paul R Selvin. Single molecule FRET reveals pore size and opening mechanism of a mechano-sensitive ion channel.eLife, 3:e01834, February 2014

    2014

  40. [48]

    A. J. Hudspeth. How the ear’s works work. Nature, 341(6241):397–404, October 1989

    1989

  41. [49]

    D. P. Corey and A. J. Hudspeth. Kinetics of the receptor current in bullfrog saccular hair cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 3(5):962–976, May 1983

    1983

  42. [50]

    Kandel, James Harris Schwartz, and Thomas Jessell

    Eric R. Kandel, James Harris Schwartz, and Thomas Jessell. Principles of Neural Science, Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill, January 2000

    2000

  43. [51]

    The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors

    Kenneth O Johnson. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(4):455–461, August 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    Nauli, Francis J

    Surya M. Nauli, Francis J. Alenghat, Ying Luo, Eric Williams, Peter Vassilev, Xiaogang Li, An- drew E. H. Elia, Weining Lu, Edward M. Brown, Stephen J. Quinn, Donald E. Ingber, and Jing Zhou. Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells.Na...

    2003

  45. [53]

    Guilford

    Bin Guo and William H. Guilford. Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(26):9844– 9849, June 2006. 16

    2006

  46. [54]

    Molloy, Stephan Schmitz, and John Kendrick-Jones

    Claudia Veigel, Justin E. Molloy, Stephan Schmitz, and John Kendrick-Jones. Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers. Nature Cell Biology, 5(11):980–986, November 2003

    2003

  47. [55]

    Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks

    P A Janmey, U Euteneuer, P Traub, and M Schliwa. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. Journal of Cell Biology , 113(1):155–160, April 1991

    1991

  48. [56]

    Biomechanical properties of intermediate filaments: From tissues to single filaments and back

    Laurent Kreplak and Douglas Fudge. Biomechanical properties of intermediate filaments: From tissues to single filaments and back. BioEssays, 29(1):26–35, 2007

    2007

  49. [57]

    Force generation by dynamic microtubules

    Marileen Dogterom, Jacob WJ Kerssemakers, Guillaume Romet-Lemonne, and Marcel E Jan- son. Force generation by dynamic microtubules. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 17(1):67–74, February 2005

    2005

  50. [58]

    Koenderink

    Marileen Dogterom and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Actin–microtubule crosstalk in cell biology.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(1):38–54, January 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    Role of Y AP/TAZ in mechanotransduction

    Sirio Dupont, Leonardo Morsut, Mariaceleste Aragona, Elena Enzo, Stefano Giulitti, Michelan- gelo Cordenonsi, Francesca Zanconato, Jimmy Le Digabel, Mattia Forcato, Silvio Bicciato, Nicola Elvassore, and Stefano Piccolo. Role of Y AP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature, 474(735...

    2011

  52. [60]

    Gandevia

    Uwe Proske and Simon C. Gandevia. The Proprioceptive Senses: Their Roles in Signaling Body Shape, Body Position and Movement, and Muscle Force. Physiological Reviews, 92(4):1651– 1697, October 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    Dimitrije Stamenovi ´c and Michael L. Smith. Tensional homeostasis at different length scales.Soft Matter, 16(30):6946–6963, 2020

    2020

  54. [62]

    Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 29(8):681 690, August 1984

    N Hogan. Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 29(8):681 690, August 1984

    1984

  55. [63]

    Humphrey, Eric R

    Jay D. Humphrey, Eric R. Dufresne, and Martin A. Schwartz. Mechanotransduction and extra- cellular matrix homeostasis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15(12):802–812, December 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    Paluch, and Kevin J

    Henry De Belly, Ewa K. Paluch, and Kevin J. Chalut. Interplay between mechanics and signalling in regulating cell fate. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 23(7):465–480, July 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    Somlyo and Avril V

    Andrew P. Somlyo and Avril V . Somlyo. Ca2+ Sensitivity of Smooth Muscle and Nonmuscle Myosin II: Modulated by G Proteins, Kinases, and Myosin Phosphatase. Physiological Reviews, 83(4):1325–1358, October 2003

    2003

  58. [66]

    Visceral organ morphogenesis via calcium-patterned muscle constrictions

    Noah P Mitchell, Dillon J Cislo, Suraj Shankar, Yuzheng Lin, Boris I Shraiman, and Sebas- tian J Streichan. Visceral organ morphogenesis via calcium-patterned muscle constrictions. eLife, 11:e77355, May 2022. 17

    2022

  59. [67]

    Soteropoulos and Stuart N

    Demetris S. Soteropoulos and Stuart N. Baker. Long-latency Responses to a Mechanical Perturba- tion of the Index Finger Have a Spinal Component. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(20):3933–3948, May 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    Cell Biology by the Numbers

    Ron Milo and Rob Phillips. Cell Biology by the Numbers. Garland Science, New York, December 2015

    2015

  61. [69]

    McNeill Alexander

    R. McNeill Alexander. Models and the scaling of energy costs for locomotion. Journal of Exper- imental Biology, 208(9):1645–1652, May 2005

    2005

  62. [70]

    Chris J. Barclay. Chapter 6 - Efficiency of Skeletal Muscle. In Jerzy A. Zoladz, editor, Muscle and Exercise Physiology, pages 111–127. Academic Press, January 2019

    2019

  63. [71]

    Davis, Karel Proesmans, and ´Etienne Fodor

    Luke K. Davis, Karel Proesmans, and ´Etienne Fodor. Active Matter under Control: Insights from Response Theory. Physical Review X, 14(1):011012, February 2024. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  64. [72]

    James P. Sethna. Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity: Second Edition. Oxford University Press, January 2021

    2021

  65. [73]

    Watson, Yu-Chen Chao, Junang Li, Todd R

    Tzer Han Tan, Garrett A. Watson, Yu-Chen Chao, Junang Li, Todd R. Gingrich, Jordan M. Horowitz, and Nikta Fakhri. Scale-dependent irreversibility in living matter, July 2021. arXiv:2107.05701

    2021 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Life, hierarchy, and the thermodynamic machinery of planet Earth

    Axel Kleidon. Life, hierarchy, and the thermodynamic machinery of planet Earth. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(4):424–460, December 2010

    2010

  67. [75]

    L. M. Martyushev and V . D. Seleznev. Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chem- istry and biology. Physics Reports, 426(1):1–45, April 2006

    2006

  68. [76]

    Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process

    R Landauer. Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3):183–191, 1961

    1961

  69. [77]

    C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal , 27(3):379–423, July 1948. Conference Name: The Bell System Technical Journal

    1948

  70. [78]

    Ouldridge, Christopher C

    Thomas E. Ouldridge, Christopher C. Govern, and Pieter Rein ten Wolde. Thermodynamics of Computational Copying in Biochemical Systems. Physical Review X, 7(2):021004, April 2017. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2017

  71. [79]

    60 years of Landauer’s principle

    Iulia Georgescu. 60 years of Landauer’s principle. Nature Reviews Physics , 3(12):770–770, December 2021. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2021

  72. [80]

    A. C. Barato, D. Hartich, and U. Seifert. Information-theoretic versus thermodynamic entropy production in autonomous sensory networks. Physical Review E, 87(4):042104, April 2013. Pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    2013

  73. [81]

    Horowitz and Massimiliano Esposito

    Jordan M. Horowitz and Massimiliano Esposito. Thermodynamics with Continuous Information Flow. Physical Review X, 4(3):031015, July 2014. Publisher: American Physical Society. 18

    2014

  74. [82]

    High-Precision Test of Landauer’s Prin- ciple in a Feedback Trap

    Yonggun Jun, Mom ˇcilo Gavrilov, and John Bechhoefer. High-Precision Test of Landauer’s Prin- ciple in a Feedback Trap. Physical Review Letters, 113(19):190601, November 2014. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2014

  75. [83]

    Sivak, and Jannik Ehrich

    Mathis Grelier, David A. Sivak, and Jannik Ehrich. Unlocking the potential of information flow: Maximizing free-energy transduction in a model of an autonomous rotary molecular motor.Phys- ical Review E, 109(3):034115, March 2024. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  76. [84]

    Memorizing environmental signals through feedback and feedforward loops

    Yanfei Jiang and Nan Hao. Memorizing environmental signals through feedback and feedforward loops. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 69:96–102, April 2021

    2021

  77. [85]

    Importance of Feedback and Feedforward Loops to Adaptive Immune Response Modeling

    Anisur Rahman, Abhinav Tiwari, Jatin Narula, and Timothy Hickling. Importance of Feedback and Feedforward Loops to Adaptive Immune Response Modeling. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 7(10):621–628, 2018

    2018

  78. [86]

    Integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback during head stabilization in hawkmoths

    Payel Chatterjee, Agnish Dev Prusty, Umesh Mohan, and Sanjay P Sane. Integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback during head stabilization in hawkmoths. eLife, 11:e78410, June 2022. Publisher: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    2022

  79. [87]

    Contribution of Feedback and Feedforward Strategies to Locomotor Adaptations

    Tania Lam, Martin Anderschitz, and V olker Dietz. Contribution of Feedback and Feedforward Strategies to Locomotor Adaptations. Journal of Neurophysiology , 95(2):766–773, February

  80. [88]

    Keir G. Pearson. Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback. In Progress in Brain Research, volume 143 of Brain Mechanisms for the Integration of Posture and Movement, pages 123–129. Elsevier, January 2004

    2004

  81. [89]

    Calicchia, Rui Ni, and George V

    Yangfan Zhang, Hungtang Ko, Michael A. Calicchia, Rui Ni, and George V . Lauder. Collec- tive movement of schooling fish reduces the costs of locomotion in turbulent conditions. PLOS Biology, 22(6):e3002501, June 2024. Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2024

  82. [90]

    Wold, Rundong Yang, James Lynch, Ellen Liu, Nick Gravish, and Simon Sponberg

    Ethan S. Wold, Rundong Yang, James Lynch, Ellen Liu, Nick Gravish, and Simon Sponberg. Supra-resonant wingbeats in insects, May 2025. bioRxiv: 2025.05.07.652680

    2025

  83. [91]

    Taha, Mohammadali Kiani, Tyson L

    Haithem E. Taha, Mohammadali Kiani, Tyson L. Hedrick, and Jeremy S. M. Greeter. Vibrational control: A hidden stabilization mechanism in insect flight. Science Robotics, 5(46):eabb1502, September 2020. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2020

  84. [92]

    Bridging two insect flight modes in evolution, physiology and robophysics

    Jeff Gau, James Lynch, Brett Aiello, Ethan Wold, Nick Gravish, and Simon Sponberg. Bridging two insect flight modes in evolution, physiology and robophysics. Nature, 622(7984):767–774, October 2023. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  85. [93]

    Jeffrey Aguilar, Tingnan Zhang, Feifei Qian, Mark Kingsbury, Benjamin McInroe, Nicole Ma- zouchova, Chen Li, Ryan Maladen, Chaohui Gong, Matt Travers, Ross L Hatton, Howie Choset, Paul B Umbanhowar, and Daniel I Goldman. A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movemen...

    2016

  86. [94]

    Astley, Chaohui Gong, Sandy M

    Benjamin McInroe, Henry C. Astley, Chaohui Gong, Sandy M. Kawano, Perrin E. Schiebel, Jen- nifer M. Rieser, Howie Choset, Richard W. Blob, and Daniel I. Goldman. Tail use improves perfor- mance on soft substrates in models of early vertebrate land locomotors. Science, 353(6295...

    2016

  87. [95]

    Flipper-driven terrestrial lo- comotion of a sea turtle-inspired robot

    Nicole Mazouchova, Paul B Umbanhowar, and Daniel I Goldman. Flipper-driven terrestrial lo- comotion of a sea turtle-inspired robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 8(2):026007, April 2013. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2013

  88. [96]

    Baxi Chong, Juntao He, Daniel Soto, Tianyu Wang, Daniel Irvine, Grigoriy Blekherman, and Daniel I. Goldman. Multilegged matter transport: A framework for locomotion on noisy land- scapes. Science, 380(6644):509–515, May 2023. Publisher: American Association for the Ad- vanceme...

    2023

  89. [97]

    A general locomotion control framework for multi-legged locomotors

    Baxi Chong, Yasemin O Aydin, Jennifer M Rieser, Guillaume Sartoretti, Tianyu Wang, Julian Whitman, Abdul Kaba, Enes Aydin, Ciera McFarland, Kelimar Diaz Cruz, Jeffery W Rankin, Krijn B Michel, Alfredo Nicieza, John R Hutchinson, Howie Choset, and Daniel I Goldman. A general lo...

    2022

  90. [98]

    Rieser, Baxi Chong, Chaohui Gong, Henry C

    Jennifer M. Rieser, Baxi Chong, Chaohui Gong, Henry C. Astley, Perrin E. Schiebel, Kelimar Diaz, Christopher J. Pierce, Hang Lu, Ross L. Hatton, Howie Choset, and Daniel I. Goldman. Geometric phase predicts locomotion performance in undulating living systems across scales. Pro...

    2024

  91. [99]

    Tianyu Wang, Christopher Pierce, Velin Kojouharov, Baxi Chong, Kelimar Diaz, Hang Lu, and Daniel I. Goldman. Mechanical intelligence simplifies control in terrestrial limbless locomotion. Science Robotics , 8(85):eadi2243, December 2023. Publisher: American Association for the...

    2023

  92. [100]

    Rankin, Krijn B Michel, Alfredo Nicieza, John R Hutchinson, Daniel I Goldman, and Howie Choset

    Baxi Chong, Yasemin Ozkan Aydin, Chaohui Gong, Guillaume Sartoretti, Yunjin Wu, Jennifer M Rieser, Haosen Xing, Perrin E Schiebel, Jeffery W. Rankin, Krijn B Michel, Alfredo Nicieza, John R Hutchinson, Daniel I Goldman, and Howie Choset. Coordination of lateral body bending an...

    2021

  93. [101]

    Mitigating memory effects during undulatory locomotion on hysteretic materials.eLife, 9:e51412, June 2020

    Perrin E Schiebel, Henry C Astley, Jennifer M Rieser, Shashank Agarwal, Christian Hubicki, Alex M Hubbard, Kelimar Diaz, Joseph R Mendelson III, Ken Kamrin, and Daniel I Goldman. Mitigating memory effects during undulatory locomotion on hysteretic materials.eLife, 9:e51412, Ju...

    2020

  94. [102]

    Hatton, Joseph R

    Hamidreza Marvi, Chaohui Gong, Nick Gravish, Henry Astley, Matthew Travers, Ross L. Hatton, Joseph R. Mendelson, Howie Choset, David L. Hu, and Daniel I. Goldman. Sidewinding with minimal slip: Snake and robot ascent of sandy slopes. Science, 346(6206):224–229, October

  95. [103]

    Review of snake robots in constrained environ- ments

    Jindong Liu, Yuchuang Tong, and Jinguo Liu. Review of snake robots in constrained environ- ments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 141:103785, July 2021

    2021

  96. [104]

    Rieser, Bo Lin, Abdul Kaba, Grigoriy Blekherman, Howie Choset, and Daniel I

    Baxi Chong, Tianyu Wang, Jennifer M. Rieser, Bo Lin, Abdul Kaba, Grigoriy Blekherman, Howie Choset, and Daniel I. Goldman. Frequency modulation of body waves to improve performance of sidewinding robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 40(12-14):1547–1562, Dec...

    2021

  97. [105]

    An Experimental Study on the Fish Body Flapping Patterns by Using a Biomimetic Robot Fish

    Fengran Xie, Zheng Li, Yang Ding, Yong Zhong, and Ruxu Du. An Experimental Study on the Fish Body Flapping Patterns by Using a Biomimetic Robot Fish. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(1):64–71, January 2020

    2020

  98. [106]

    Hill-type, bioinspired actuation delivers energy economy in DC motors

    Jake McGrath and Jos ´e Alvarado. Hill-type, bioinspired actuation delivers energy economy in DC motors. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 17(6):066021, November 2022

    2022

  99. [107]

    Johnson, and Jos ´e Alvarado

    Jake McGrath, Brian Kent, Colin L. Johnson, and Jos ´e Alvarado. Microscale velocity-dependent unbinding generates a macroscale performance-efficiency tradeoff in actomyosin systems. Com- munications Biology, 8(1):1–12, May 2025. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025

  100. [108]

    Stephen Lansing

    J. Stephen Lansing. Complex Adaptive Systems. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(V olume 32, 2003):183–204, October 2003. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2003

  101. [109]

    Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches

    Rika Preiser, Reinette Biggs, Alta De V os, and Carl Folke. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 2018. Publisher: Resilience Alliance Inc

    2018

  102. [110]

    Simon A. Levin. Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems. Ecosystems, 1(5):431–436, September 1998

    1998

  103. [111]

    E. D. Schwab and K. J. Pienta. Cancer as a complex adaptive system. Medical Hypotheses , 47(3):235–241, September 1996

    1996

  104. [112]

    Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune sys- tem

    Akiko Iwasaki and Ruslan Medzhitov. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune sys- tem. Nature Immunology, 16(4):343–353, April 2015. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2015

  105. [113]

    Applying Machine Learning in Self-adaptive Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

    Omid Gheibi, Danny Weyns, and Federico Quin. Applying Machine Learning in Self-adaptive Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst., 15(3):9:1–9:37, Au- gust 2021

    2021

  106. [114]

    Subba Rao

    Sudeshna Sinha, Ramakrishna Ramaswamy, and J. Subba Rao. Adaptive control in nonlinear dynamics. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 43(1):118–128, May 1990

    1990

  107. [115]

    Eugene Lavretsky and Kevin A. Wise. Robust Adaptive Control. In Eugene Lavretsky and Kevin A. Wise, editors, Robust and Adaptive Control: With Aerospace Applications, pages 469–

  108. [116]

    Maynard Smith and M

    J. Maynard Smith and M. Slatkin. The Stability of Predator-Prey Systems. Ecology, 54(2):384– 391, 1973. 21

    1973

  109. [117]

    Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator–prey sys- tem

    Akihiko Mougi and Yoh Iwasa. Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator–prey sys- tem. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1697):3163–3171, May 2010. Publisher: Royal Society

    2010

  110. [118]

    Colombo, Crist ´obal L ´opez, Emilio Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, and Celia Anteneodo

    Vivian Dornelas, Eduardo H. Colombo, Crist ´obal L ´opez, Emilio Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, and Celia Anteneodo. Landscape-induced spatial oscillations in population dynamics. Scientific Reports, 11(1):3470, February 2021. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2021

  111. [119]

    Basil Slobodkin

    L. Basil Slobodkin. Conditions for Population Equilibrium. Ecology, 36(3):530–533, 1955. Pub- lisher: [Wiley, Ecological Society of America]

    1955

  112. [120]

    Escudero, J

    C. Escudero, J. Buceta, F. J. de la Rubia, and Katja Lindenberg. Extinction in population dynamics. Physical Review E, 69(2):021908, February 2004. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2004

  113. [121]

    Feldman, and Kenichi Aoki

    William Gilpin, Marcus W. Feldman, and Kenichi Aoki. An ecocultural model predicts Ne- anderthal extinction through competition with modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(8):2134–2139, February 2016. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy ...

    2016

  114. [122]

    Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos

    Ilkka Hanski, Peter Turchin, Erkki Korpim ¨aki, and Heikki Henttonen. Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos. Nature, 364(6434):232–235, July

  115. [123]

    Childs, and Christopher F

    Francesco Cerini, Dylan Z. Childs, and Christopher F. Clements. A predictive timeline of wildlife population collapse. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7(3):320–331, March 2023. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  116. [124]

    Lee-Yaw, Jenny L

    Julie A. Lee-Yaw, Jenny L. McCune, Samuel Pironon, and Seema N. Sheth. Species distribution models rarely predict the biology of real populations. Ecography, 2022(6):e05877, 2022

    2022

  117. [125]

    Levine, Ruby An, Nathan J

    Jacob I. Levine, Ruby An, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Stephen W. Pacala, and Jonathan M. Levine. Why ecologists struggle to predict coexistence from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 40(2):147–158, February 2025. Publisher: Elsevier

    2025

  118. [126]

    Boyce, and Daryl J

    Cailin Xu, Mark S. Boyce, and Daryl J. Daley. Harvesting in seasonal environments. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 50(6):663–682, June 2005

    2005

  119. [127]

    J. R. Beddington and Robert M. May. Harvesting Natural Populations in a Randomly Fluctuating Environment. Science, 197(4302):463–465, July 1977. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    1977

  120. [128]

    Mark S. Hoddle. Restoring Balance: Using Exotic Species to Control Invasive Exotic Species. Conservation Biology, 18(1):38–49, 2004

    2004

  121. [129]

    M. E. Solomon. The Natural Control of Animal Populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 18(1):1– 35, 1949. Publisher: [Wiley, British Ecological Society]

    1949

  122. [130]

    Pausas and William J

    Juli G. Pausas and William J. Bond. Feedbacks in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(8):637–644, August 2022. Publisher: Elsevier. 22

    2022

  123. [131]

    Robertson

    Douglas S. Robertson. Feedback theory and Darwinian evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 152(4):469–484, October 1991

    1991

  124. [132]

    Craig Blain and Jack W

    J. Craig Blain and Jack W. Szostak. Progress Toward Synthetic Cells. Annual Review of Biochem- istry, 83(V olume 83, 2014):615–640, June 2014. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2014

  125. [133]

    Gaut and Katarzyna P

    Nathaniel J. Gaut and Katarzyna P. Adamala. Reconstituting Natural Cell Elements in Synthetic Cells. Advanced Biology, 5(3):2000188, 2021

    2021

  126. [134]

    Wakana Sato, Tomasz Zajkowski, Felix Moser, and Katarzyna P. Adamala. Synthetic cells in biomedical applications. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 14(2):e1761, 2022

    2022

  127. [135]

    Frohn, Shunshi Kohyama, and Petra Schwille

    B ´ela P. Frohn, Shunshi Kohyama, and Petra Schwille. Protein design and optimization for syn- thetic cells. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, pages 1–15, May 2025. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025

  128. [136]

    Exoskeletons and robotic prosthetics: a review of recent developments

    Robert Bogue. Exoskeletons and robotic prosthetics: a review of recent developments. Indus- trial Robot: An International Journal , 36(5):421–427, January 2009. Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited

    2009

  129. [137]

    Current Solutions and Future Trends for Robotic Prosthetic Hands.Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 4(V olume 4, 2021):595–627, May 2021

    Vincent Mendez, Francesco Iberite, Solaiman Shokur, and Silvestro Micera. Current Solutions and Future Trends for Robotic Prosthetic Hands.Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 4(V olume 4, 2021):595–627, May 2021. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2021

  130. [138]

    Lan- dis, Gabriel N

    Hyungeun Song, Tsung-Han Hsieh, Seong Ho Yeon, Tony Shu, Michael Nawrot, Christian F. Lan- dis, Gabriel N. Friedman, Erica A. Israel, Samantha Gutierrez-Arango, Matthew J. Carty, Lisa E. Freed, and Hugh M. Herr. Continuous neural control of a bionic limb restores biomimetic ga...

    2010

  131. [139]

    Modeling Heterogeneous Brain Dynamics of Depression and Melancholia Using Energy Land- scape Analysis

    Paul Rossener Regonia, Masahiro Takamura, Takashi Nakano, Naho Ichikawa, Alan Fermin, Go Okada, Yasumasa Okamoto, Shigeto Yamawaki, Kazushi Ikeda, and Junichiro Yoshimoto. Modeling Heterogeneous Brain Dynamics of Depression and Melancholia Using Energy Land- scape Analysis. Fr...

    2021

  132. [140]

    Edmund T. Rolls. Attractor cortical neurodynamics, schizophrenia, and depression. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1):1–17, April 2021. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2021

  133. [141]

    Rutter, Henry Cope, Matthew J

    Lindsay A. Rutter, Henry Cope, Matthew J. MacKay, Ra´ul Herranz, Saswati Das, Sergey A. Pono- marev, Sylvain V . Costes, Amber M. Paul, Richard Barker, Deanne M. Taylor, Daniela Bezdan, Nathaniel J. Szewczyk, Masafumi Muratani, Christopher E. Mason, and Stefania Giacomello. As...

    2024

  134. [142]

    Christopher E. Mason. The Next 500 Years: Engineering Life to Reach New Worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2021. 23

    2021

  135. [143]

    Garrett-Bakelman, Manjula Darshi, Stefan J

    Francine E. Garrett-Bakelman, Manjula Darshi, Stefan J. Green, Ruben C. Gur, Ling Lin, Bran- don R. Macias, Miles J. McKenna, Cem Meydan, Tejaswini Mishra, Jad Nasrini, Brian D. Piening, Lindsay F. Rizzardi, Kumar Sharma, Jamila H. Siamwala, Lynn Taylor, Martha Hotz Vitaterna,...

    2019

  136. [144]

    Overbey, Krista Ryon, JangKeun Kim, Braden T

    Eliah G. Overbey, Krista Ryon, JangKeun Kim, Braden T. Tierney, Remi Klotz, Veronica Ortiz, Sean Mullane, Julian C. Schmidt, Matthew MacKay, Namita Damle, Deena Najjar, Irina Matei, Laura Patras, J. Sebastian Garcia Medina, Ashley S. Kleinman, Jeremy Wain Hirschberg, Jacque- l...

    2024

  137. [145]

    Langan, Scott E

    Robert A. Langan, Scott E. Boyken, Andrew H. Ng, Jennifer A. Samson, Galen Dods, Alexan- dra M. Westbrook, Taylor H. Nguyen, Marc J. Lajoie, Zibo Chen, Stephanie Berger, Vikram Khip- ple Mulligan, John E. Dueber, Walter R. P. Novak, Hana El-Samad, and David Baker. De novo desi...

    2019

  138. [146]

    Lalani, and Mohan Pammi

    Srinivasan Mani, Seema R. Lalani, and Mohan Pammi. Genomics and multiomics in the age of precision medicine. Pediatric Research, pages 1–12, April 2025

    2025

  139. [147]

    Control strategy for biopharmaceutical production by model predictive control

    Touraj Eslami and Alois Jungbauer. Control strategy for biopharmaceutical production by model predictive control. Biotechnology Progress, 40(2):e3426, 2024. 24

    2024

  140. [506]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2024

    2024

  141. [1993]

    Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  142. [2006]

    Publisher: American Physiological Society

  143. [2014]

    Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 20

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.