pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2509.04431 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-04 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-th

Extended applicability domain of viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics in (2+1)-D Bjorken flow with transverse expansion

Yiyang Peng , Victor E. Ambrus , Clemens Werthmann , S\"oren Schlichting , Ulrich Heinz , Huichao Song This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-th
keywords viscous anisotropic hydrodynamicsBjorken flowtransverse expansionkinetic theoryquark-gluon plasmaheavy-ion collisionssmall systemscollective flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics matches kinetic theory results over a wider range of opacities than standard viscous hydrodynamics does.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a refined version of fluid dynamics can track the expansion of hot nuclear matter more reliably than ordinary viscous hydrodynamics. The authors run (2+1)-dimensional simulations that include both the usual longitudinal stretching and sideways expansion under boost-invariant and conformal conditions. They pit both the refined and the standard fluid models against direct simulations from kinetic theory that follows particle collisions in the relaxation-time approximation. If the refined model holds up, fluid descriptions could reach into smaller collision systems where conventional hydrodynamics starts to lose accuracy. This would matter for interpreting flow signals seen in proton-nucleus or other small-system data at colliders.

Core claim

Viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics supplies a closer match to the microscopic evolution given by kinetic theory across a broad interval of opacities. In the studied (2+1)-D Bjorken flow with transverse expansion, the anisotropic version remains accurate even when the system becomes less opaque and standard viscous hydrodynamics begins to diverge from the kinetic benchmark. The comparison is performed under boost-invariant and conformal conditions, showing that the anisotropic treatment extends the regime in which hydrodynamic modeling can still be trusted for collective flow.

What carries the argument

Viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics (VAH), a fluid framework that incorporates direction-dependent pressure corrections and is benchmarked directly against relaxation-time kinetic theory.

If this is right

  • Hydrodynamic modeling of collective flow becomes usable in smaller collision systems where opacity is lower.
  • The transverse expansion stage in boost-invariant flows receives a more accurate fluid-level description.
  • VAH can serve as a bridge between microscopic kinetic simulations and macroscopic hydrodynamic evolution over wider parameter ranges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same anisotropic treatment might improve modeling of early-time non-equilibrium stages in full three-dimensional heavy-ion collisions.
  • If the pattern holds beyond conformal and boost-invariant settings, it could reduce reliance on hybrid kinetic-hydro approaches in intermediate regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The relaxation-time approximation in kinetic theory serves as a faithful stand-in for the true microscopic particle dynamics in the expanding system.

What would settle it

A comparison in which full solutions of the Boltzmann equation or measured flow data deviate from VAH predictions more strongly than from standard viscous hydrodynamics in the same low-opacity regime would falsify the claimed extension of applicability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04431 by Clemens Werthmann, Huichao Song, S\"oren Schlichting, Ulrich Heinz, Victor E. Ambrus, Yiyang Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Time evolution of transverse energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Opacity ˆγ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Opacity ˆγ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform (2+1)-D simulations of viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics (VAH) under boost-invariant and conformal conditions. Comparing both VAH and traditional viscous hydrodynamics with kinetic theory in the relaxation-time approximation as the underlying microscopic theory, we show that VAH provides a superior description of the evolution across a wide range of opacity, effectively extending the applicability of hydrodynamic modeling. Our results demonstrate VAH's potential for describing collective flow in small systems where traditional hydrodynamics faces challenges.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs (2+1)-D simulations of viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics (VAH) under boost-invariant conformal Bjorken flow with transverse expansion. It compares the evolution of VAH and standard viscous hydrodynamics against kinetic theory in the relaxation-time approximation (RTA) across a range of opacities and concludes that VAH yields a superior description, thereby extending the domain of applicability of hydrodynamic modeling to small systems.

Significance. If the quantitative comparisons hold, the work would be significant for hydrodynamic modeling of small collision systems in heavy-ion physics, where large gradients challenge traditional viscous hydrodynamics. The numerical approach provides direct tests against an independent microscopic calculation, which is a strength, though the absence of explicit error metrics limits immediate assessment of the improvement.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (comparison section): The claim that VAH provides a 'superior description' across a wide opacity range is asserted via visual or qualitative comparison to RTA results, but no quantitative error measures (e.g., integrated relative deviations, L2 norms, or percentage errors on energy density, pressure anisotropy, or transverse flow) are reported. This makes it difficult to evaluate the magnitude of improvement over standard viscous hydrodynamics and the precise extension of the applicability domain.
  2. [§2.3] §2.3 (kinetic theory benchmark): The central claim that VAH extends the hydrodynamic domain rests on RTA serving as a faithful reference. However, RTA employs a constant relaxation time and isotropic scattering; in low-opacity regimes with strong transverse gradients, momentum-dependent scattering or higher-order non-equilibrium effects not captured by RTA could alter the reference evolution. A sensitivity test with alternative collision kernels would be required to confirm that the observed superiority is not specific to this simplified microscopic model.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'wide range of opacity' is used without specifying the numerical interval (e.g., 0.1 to 10 or similar), which would clarify the scope of the claimed extension.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several figures comparing VAH, viscous hydrodynamics, and RTA lack explicit curve labels or legends in the caption text, requiring readers to cross-reference the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have made revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (comparison section): The claim that VAH provides a 'superior description' across a wide opacity range is asserted via visual or qualitative comparison to RTA results, but no quantitative error measures (e.g., integrated relative deviations, L2 norms, or percentage errors on energy density, pressure anisotropy, or transverse flow) are reported. This makes it difficult to evaluate the magnitude of improvement over standard viscous hydrodynamics and the precise extension of the applicability domain.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error measures would allow a more precise evaluation of the improvement. In the revised manuscript we have added L2 norms of the relative deviations for energy density, pressure anisotropy, and transverse flow velocity, together with a table of integrated percentage errors across the opacity range. These metrics show that VAH reduces deviations relative to RTA by 30-60% compared with standard viscous hydrodynamics at low opacities, confirming the extended applicability domain. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2.3] §2.3 (kinetic theory benchmark): The central claim that VAH extends the hydrodynamic domain rests on RTA serving as a faithful reference. However, RTA employs a constant relaxation time and isotropic scattering; in low-opacity regimes with strong transverse gradients, momentum-dependent scattering or higher-order non-equilibrium effects not captured by RTA could alter the reference evolution. A sensitivity test with alternative collision kernels would be required to confirm that the observed superiority is not specific to this simplified microscopic model.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that RTA is a simplified model. We chose RTA because it is the standard benchmark used throughout the literature for testing hydrodynamic applicability in boost-invariant flows with transverse expansion, permitting direct comparison with prior studies. While momentum-dependent kernels or higher-order effects could modify the reference, such an investigation lies outside the scope of the present work, which focuses on demonstrating VAH's performance against this established microscopic description. We therefore do not add sensitivity tests in the revision. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation present but not load-bearing; central validation uses independent RTA benchmark

full rationale

The paper's core result is obtained by direct numerical comparison of VAH and standard viscous hydrodynamics against an external relaxation-time approximation kinetic theory benchmark in (2+1)D boost-invariant conformal flow with transverse expansion. This reference is an independent microscopic model rather than a fit or redefinition internal to the VAH equations. Any self-citations to prior VAH framework papers by overlapping authors are peripheral and do not carry the load-bearing step that establishes superiority across opacities. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the stated external benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into parameters or assumptions; the listed items are inferred from the stated conditions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system obeys boost-invariant and conformal conditions.
    Explicitly stated as the setup for the (2+1)-D simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5628 in / 1079 out tokens · 35032 ms · 2026-05-18T18:44:44.829476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Energy loss of heavy-flavor quarks in color string medium

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Preliminary simulations show charm quarks lose significantly less transverse momentum in a fluctuating color string medium than in the hydrodynamic expansion of the EPOS4HQ model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 57 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The evolution equations for the shear stress tensor πµν can be derived from the kinetic theory [80–85] or constrained from the second law of thermodynamics [86, 87]. They take the form of relaxation equations of second order Mueller-Israel-Steward type, τπ ˙π⟨µν⟩ + πµν = 2ησ µν + 2τππ⟨µ λ ων⟩λ − δππ πµνθ − τππ πλ⟨µσν⟩ λ + ϕ7π⟨µ α πν⟩α, (3) where ˙A = u · ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Owing to the symmetry properties, the evolution of a given initial profile depends only on the opacity parame- ter ˆγ [41], defined by ˆγ = 1 5η/s R πa dE0 ⊥ dη 1/4

    or Appendix B for details. Owing to the symmetry properties, the evolution of a given initial profile depends only on the opacity parame- ter ˆγ [41], defined by ˆγ = 1 5η/s R πa dE0 ⊥ dη 1/4 . (11) Here a is the coefficient in the conformal EoS, dE0 ⊥/dη is the initial transverse energy, dE0 ⊥ dη = Z x⊥ τ0ϵ0(x⊥), (12) and the rms transverse radiusR that ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Facets of Rotating Quark- Gluon Plasma

    This underscores the superior capability of VAH in modeling collective flow signals in small collision systems. At lower opacity, the behavior of εp obtained in these three models differ significantly. In RTA kinetic theory, the value of εp converges to zero in the free-streaming limit (ˆγ → 0), while VAH and scaled vHLLE yield posi- tive and negative εp,...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. F. Kolb and U. Heinz, “Hydrodynamic descrip- tion of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,” in Quark-Gluon Plasma 3, edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang (2003) pp. 634–714, arXiv:nucl-th/0305084 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma

    D. A. Teaney, “Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma,” in Quark-Gluon Plasma 4, edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang (2010) pp. 207–266, arXiv:0905.2433 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Integrated Dynamical Approach to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    T. Hirano, P. Huovinen, K. Murase, and Y. Nara, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 108 (2013), arXiv:1204.5814 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era

    W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, and M. Spalinski, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 046001 (2018), arXiv:1707.02282 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    H. Song, Y. Zhou, and K. Gajdosova, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 99 (2017), arXiv:1703.00670 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Heinz and B

    U. Heinz and B. Schenke (2024) arXiv:2412.19393 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Aidala et al

    C. Aidala et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 062302 (2018), arXiv:1707.06108 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Aidala et al

    C. Aidala et al. (PHENIX), Nature Phys. 15, 214 (2019), arXiv:1805.02973 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. C 90, 054901 (2014), arXiv:1406.2474 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Measurement of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in $pp$, $p$+Pb and low-multiplicity Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector

    M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 428 (2017), arXiv:1705.04176 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 142301 (2019), arXiv:1903.01790 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC

    V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 765, 193 (2017), arXiv:1606.06198 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 092301 (2018), arXiv:1709.09189 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Mäntysaari, B

    H. M¨ antysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 022302 (2025), arXiv:2502.05138 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Collectivity and electromagnetic radiation in small systems

    C. Shen, J.-F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014906 (2017), arXiv:1609.02590 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Collective flow in p-Pb and d-Pb collisions at TeV energies

    P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014911 (2012), arXiv:1112.0915 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    Initial state geometry and the role of hydrodynamics in proton-proton, proton-nucleus and deuteron-nucleus collisions

    A. Bzdak, B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. C 87, 064906 (2013), arXiv:1304.3403 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Elliptic and triangular flow anisotropy in deuteron-gold collisions at RHIC and proton-lead collisions at the LHC

    G.-Y. Qin and B. M¨ uller, Phys. Rev. C89, 044902 (2014), arXiv:1306.3439 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    J. L. Nagle, A. Adare, S. Beckman, T. Koblesky, J. Or- juela Koop, D. McGlinchey, P. Romatschke, J. Carlson, J. E. Lynn, and M. McCumber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 112301 (2014), arXiv:1312.4565 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Analysing radial flow features in p-Pb and p-p collisions at several TeV by studying identified particle production in EPOS3

    K. Werner, B. Guiot, I. Karpenko, and T. Pierog, Phys. Rev. C 89, 064903 (2014), arXiv:1312.1233 [nucl-th]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Evidence for flow in pPb collisions at 5 TeV from v2 mass splitting

    K. Werner, M. Bleicher, B. Guiot, I. Karpenko, and T. Pierog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 232301 (2014), arXiv:1307.4379 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Mass hierarchy in identified particle distributions in proton-lead collisions

    P. Bozek, W. Broniowski, and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 172303 (2013), arXiv:1307.5060 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Eccentric protons? Sensitivity of flow to system size and shape in p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions

    B. Schenke and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 102301 (2014), arXiv:1405.3605 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Collective flow in ultrarelativistic $^3$He-Au collisions

    P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Lett. B 739, 308 (2014), arXiv:1409.2160 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Rapidity dependence of elliptic and triangular flow in proton-nucleus collisions from collective dynamics

    P. Bozek, A. Bzdak, and G.-L. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 748, 301 (2015), arXiv:1503.03655 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Y. Zhou, X. Zhu, P. Li, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064908 (2015), arXiv:1503.06986 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351 (2017), arXiv:1701.07145 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Imprints of fluctuating proton shapes on flow in proton-lead collisions at the LHC

    H. M¨ antysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Lett. B 772, 681 (2017), arXiv:1705.03177 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    W. Zhao, Y. Zhou, H. Xu, W. Deng, and H. Song, Phys. Lett. B 780, 495 (2018), arXiv:1801.00271 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044905 (2020), arXiv:2005.14682 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135322 (2020), arXiv:1908.06212 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    J. D. Orjuela Koop, R. Belmont, P. Yin, and J. L. Nagle, Phys. Rev. C 93, 044910 (2016), arXiv:1512.06949 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Hydrodynamic modeling of 3He-Au collisions at sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV

    P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Lett. B 747, 135 (2015), arXiv:1503.00468 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    W. Zhao, Y. Zhou, K. Murase, and H. Song, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 846 (2020), arXiv:2001.06742 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    W. Zhao, C. M. Ko, Y.-X. Liu, G.-Y. Qin, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 072301 (2020), arXiv:1911.00826 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    W. Zhao, C. Shen, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 252302 (2022), arXiv:2203.06094 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    G. S. Denicol, U. Heinz, M. Martinez, J. Noronha, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125026 (2014), arXiv:1408.7048 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlicht- ing, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122302 (2019), arXiv:1805.01604 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Springer Proc. Phys. 250, 177 (2020), arXiv:1910.06664 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Kurkela, U

    A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 965 (2019), arXiv:1905.05139 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Kurkela, S

    A. Kurkela, S. F. Taghavi, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135901 (2020), arXiv:2007.06851 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 152301 (2020), arXiv:1908.09957 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Du and S

    X. Du and S. Schlichting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 122301 (2021), arXiv:2012.09068 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    X. Du, M. P. Heller, S. Schlichting, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. D106, 014016 (2022), arXiv:2203.16549 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Blaizot and L

    J.-P. Blaizot and L. Yan, Phys. Rev. C 104, 055201 (2021), arXiv:2106.10508 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094013 (2023), arXiv:2211.14379 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Arslandok et al., (2023), arXiv:2303.17254 [nucl-ex]

    M. Arslandok et al., (2023), arXiv:2303.17254 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 152301 (2023), arXiv:2211.14356 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Werthmann, V

    C. Werthmann, V. E. Ambrus, and S. Schlichting, PoS HardProbes2023, 048 (2024), arXiv:2307.08306 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    V. E. Ambru¸ s, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, AIP Conf. Proc. 3181, 050004 (2024), arXiv:2302.10618 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054025 (2025), arXiv:2411.19709 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054024 (2025), arXiv:2411.19708 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Dissipative Dynamics of Highly Anisotropic Systems

    M. Martinez and M. Strickland, Nucl. Phys. A 848, 183 (2010), arXiv:1007.0889 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics

    W. Florkowski, M. Martinez, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Nucl. Phys. A 904-905, 803c (2013), arXiv:1210.1677 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Kinetic description of mixtures of anisotropic fluids

    W. Florkowski and O. Madetko, Acta Phys. Polon. B 45, 1103 (2014), arXiv:1402.2401 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Anisotropic Hydrodynamics: Three lectures

    M. Strickland, Acta Phys. Polon. B 45, 2355 (2014), arXiv:1410.5786 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    B. S. Kasmaei and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014037 (2020), arXiv:1911.03370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Far-from-equilibrium attractors and nonlinear dynamical systems approach to the Gubser flow

    A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044041 (2018), arXiv:1711.01745 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Strickland, Int

    M. Strickland, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430004 (2024), arXiv:2402.09571 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Boost-Invariant (2+1)-dimensional Anisotropic Hydrodynamics

    M. Martinez, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064913 (2012), arXiv:1204.1473 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    (3+1)-dimensional framework for leading-order non conformal anisotropic hydrodynamics

    L. Tinti, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014908 (2015), arXiv:1411.7268 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Quasiparticle anisotropic hydrodynamics for central collisions

    M. Alqahtani, M. Nopoush, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 95, 034906 (2017), arXiv:1605.02101 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Second-order (2+1)-dimensional anisotropic hydrodynamics

    D. Bazow, U. Heinz, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054910 (2014), arXiv:1311.6720 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Derivation of anisotropic dissipative fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation

    E. Molnar, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114025 (2016), arXiv:1602.00573 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    (3+1)-dimensional anisotropic fluid dynamics with a lattice QCD equation of state

    M. McNelis, D. Bazow, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 97, 054912 (2018), arXiv:1803.01810 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    Highly-anisotropic and strongly-dissipative hydrodynamics for early stages of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    W. Florkowski and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034907 (2011), arXiv:1007.0130 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  71. [71]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics for mixture of quark and gluon fluids

    W. Florkowski, E. Maksymiuk, R. Ryblewski, and L. Tinti, Phys. Rev. C 92, 054912 (2015), arXiv:1508.04534 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    Nonconformal viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics

    D. Bazow, U. Heinz, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064903 (2015), arXiv:1503.07443 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Anisotropic matching principle for the hydrodynamics expansion

    L. Tinti, Phys. Rev. C 94, 044902 (2016), arXiv:1506.07164 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    McNelis, D

    M. McNelis, D. Bazow, and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108077 (2021), arXiv:2101.02827 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Liyanage, O

    D. Liyanage, O. S¨ urer, M. Plumlee, S. M. Wild, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 108, 054905 (2023), arXiv:2302.14184 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Exploring the fluid behavior in p+p collisions at √s = 13 TeV with viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics,

    S. Zhao, Y. Peng, U. Heinz, and H. Song, “Exploring the fluid behavior in p+p collisions at √s = 13 TeV with viscous anisotropic hydrodynamics,” (2025), paper in preparation

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics for conformal Gubser flow

    M. Strickland, M. Nopoush, and R. Ryblewski, Nucl. Phys. A 956, 268 (2016), arXiv:1512.07334 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Chen and S

    S. Chen and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014001 (2025), arXiv:2409.19897 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    J. L. Anderson and H. R. Witting, Physica 74, 466 (1974). 11

    work page 1974

  80. [80]

    Testing viscous and anisotropic hydrodynamics in an exactly solvable case

    W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 88, 024903 (2013), arXiv:1305.7234 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.