Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 27 references

A Josephson junction array accepts optical data at 60 Gbit/s — four times faster than electrically driven JAWS.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 05:36 UTC pith:FPYT7F6K

load-bearing objection The pulse-pair result is real and new; the 'reliable up to 60 Gbit/s' conclusion is a post hoc threshold, so the paper is a solid conditional accept rather than a clean demonstration. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05074 v1 pith:FPYT7F6K submitted 2025-09-05 cond-mat.supr-con

Fast optical data transfer into a Josephson junction array

K. Kohop\"a\"a , J. Nissil\"a , E. Mykk\"anen , P. Selvasundaram , T. Fordell , K. Langi , E. T. Mannila , S. Kafanov
show 14 more authors
S. Ahopelto H. Syst\"a M. Ribeiro P. Sethi M. Kiviranta R. Loreto J.-W. Lee T. Rantanen V. Vesterinen O. Kieler M. Bieler J. Govenius J. Senior A. Kemppinen
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 85.25.Cp
keywords Josephson arbitrary waveform synthesizeroptical data transferdouble-pulse techniqueShapiro stepssuperconducting qubit controlexternally shunted SIS junctionsphotodiodecryogenic electronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper's central claim is that a Josephson Arbitrary Waveform Synthesizer (JAWS) — a superconducting digital-to-analogue converter — can receive optical data at about 60 Gbit/s, roughly four times faster than the ~15 GHz typical of electrically driven JAWS. To establish this, the authors send pairs of optical pulses with a controlled time separation into an externally shunted niobium junction array and track when the array stops producing odd Shapiro voltage plateaus, which marks the point at which the array can no longer tell two pulses apart as separate events. They find this crossover at a pulse spacing of about 17 picoseconds, and attribute the remaining odd-plateau ripples out to 40 ps to reflections and filter resonances rather than to the intrinsic junction bandwidth. If correct, this means low-dissipation optical control of superconducting circuits — including qubits — could run at rates competitive with or above electrical control, with the fiber optic link also removing a major source of cryogenic heat load.

Core claim

Using an externally shunted niobium SIS junction array with characteristic frequency f_c ≈ 125 GHz, flip-chip bonded to a fast photodiode, the paper demonstrates that a Josephson Arbitrary Waveform Synthesizer (JAWS) can be driven optically at pulse rates up to about 60 GHz. The evidence comes from a double-pulse experiment: two optical pulses with tunable time separation Δt are sent into the array, and the array's voltage is recorded as a function of pulse charge and bias. When Δt is large, each pulse is quantized independently, producing only even-numbered Shapiro plateaus; when the pulses overlap, odd plateaus appear. The crossover around Δt ≈ 17 ps marks the shortest pulse interval the a

What carries the argument

The central object is the externally shunted SIS (superconductor–insulator–superconductor) Josephson junction array, whose characteristic frequency f_c = I_c R/Φ_0 ≈ 125 GHz sets the maximum pulse rate. The double-pulse technique generates two orthogonally polarized optical pulses with a tunable time separation Δt; the crossover at which the JJA stops producing odd Shapiro voltage plateaus marks the minimum resolvable pulse interval, i.e., the data-rate limit. The flip-chip photodiode integration and the surrounding transmission line and filter network determine how faithfully the optical pulses reach the nonlinear array.

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands on treating the disappearance of odd Shapiro plateaus in a two-pulse experiment as if it proved that arbitrary bit patterns can be transferred at the corresponding rate; if the residual odd-plateau features at larger time separations are actually missed or mistimed steps, the 60 Gbit/s figure would not hold for real data.

What would settle it

Measure the bit-error rate of a pseudorandom optical pulse train (e.g., a 2^7−1 pattern) delivered to the same JJA at 60 Gbit/s, comparing the encoded step sequence with the measured output voltage; if errors occur above a practical threshold, the effective data rate is lower than claimed. Alternatively, use cryogenic electro-optic sampling to capture the actual current-pulse shape at the JJA input and check directly whether the ~17 ps crossover is set by the junction, the photodiode, or the intervening circuit.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Optically driven JAWS at roughly 60 Gbit/s is feasible, exceeding the ~15 GHz of conventional electrical drive by about a factor of four.
  • Flip-chip bonding the photodiode directly onto the array is sufficient to reach this rate, though residual oscillations in the odd Shapiro plateaus persist to about 40 ps.
  • The externally shunted junctions combine a high characteristic frequency (≈125 GHz) with a low critical current (≈170 µA), pointing toward low-dissipation operation suitable for driving superconducting qubits.
  • Further gains will require controlling or eliminating the parasitics that cause the observed oscillations — for example, redesigning the low-pass filter network or removing the transmission line between photodiode and array.
  • The double-pulse crossover at Δt ≈ 17 ps provides a concrete, repeatable figure of merit for the data bandwidth of any photodiode-to-JJA link.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 60 Gbit/s figure comes from a two-pulse discrimination test, not from a pseudorandom bit stream; a real link may need to back off the rate or add equalization once inter-symbol interference with arbitrary patterns is measured.
  • If the residual oscillations indeed originate in the bias-filter inductors, a redesign of those filters could push the reliable rate closer to the junction's 125 GHz characteristic frequency.
  • The same double-pulse technique could serve as a standard, sampling-oscilloscope-free bandwidth test for other cryogenic photodiode–superconductor interfaces.
  • The combination of optical delivery and low critical current directly attacks the cryogenic heat-load problem: replacing coaxial lines with fibers removes passive conduction, and low dissipation at the array cuts active heating, but qubit-level fidelity of waveforms generated at these rates has not yet been tested.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study of an optically driven Josephson arbitrary waveform synthesizer (JAWS) built from externally shunted Nb-AlOx-Nb Josephson junctions. A commercial photodiode is flip-chip bonded to a 15-junction array, and the authors measure the time-averaged array voltage as a function of dc bias, photodiode charge per pulse, and the delay between two equal optical pulses. They observe a crossover from all-integer Shapiro plateaus at short delays to predominantly even plateaus at longer delays, and interpret the disappearance of odd-plateau weight beyond Δt = 17 ps as demonstrating that the array can resolve pulses at a 60 GHz rate. A phenomenological simulation with an oscillatory current waveform reproduces the experimental trends, and the authors argue that low-pass filter inductors are a likely source of the residual oscillations.

Significance. If confirmed, this is a valuable advance: it shows that a low-critical-current, high-characteristic-frequency JAWS can be driven with optical pulses at rates well above the roughly 15 GHz typical of electrical drive, with potential implications for low-dissipation optical control of superconducting qubits and for reducing cryogenic heat load. The direct plateau measurements are a strength, and the paper is explicit about the unmeasured cryogenic pulse width and the approximate nature of the filter model. The main reservation is that the headline 'reliable data transfer up to 60 Gbit/s' is an inference from a periodic double-pulse experiment with a qualitative threshold, not a measured data fidelity. With a quantitative criterion or a pattern test, the claim would be substantially stronger.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 4(a)] The central claim (1/17 ps ≈ 60 Gbit/s) rests on the sentence 'beyond Δt = 17 ps, the width of odd plateaus becomes nonessential.' No criterion is supplied for 'nonessential.' Figure 4(a) shows odd-plateau features (v = 1, Q_PD ≈ 6 fC) continuing as damped oscillations up to Δt ≈ 40 ps. Without a quantitative definition—for example, residual odd-plateau width relative to the even-plateau width, or a bit-error-rate measurement—these remnants cannot be dismissed as negligible. The text itself states that at Δt = 14 ps the response to a bit is 'not completely independent of whether it was preceded by bit 0 or bit 1,' so the 14–17 ps transition is a smooth crossover, not a demonstrated error-free boundary. A quantitative plateau-width or BER criterion is required to support 'reliable' 60 Gbit/s operation.
  2. [Double-pulse method, Fig. 2(a)] The double-pulse experiment applies pairs of equal pulses at a 250 MHz repetition rate and measures the time-averaged voltage. This characterizes the response to a periodic two-pulse pattern, not to arbitrary bit sequences at 60 Gbit/s. Intersymbol interference is pattern-dependent: the 12 ps oscillatory component introduced in simulation 2 implies that the effective driving current retains memory over a timescale comparable to the 16.7 ps bit period, so a '1' following several '1's may behave differently from an isolated pair. The observed odd-plateau remnants up to ~40 ps confirm that the memory is longer than one bit. To substantiate the data-rate claim, the authors should either test with a pseudorandom bit sequence and quantify plateau fidelity, or explicitly restrict the claim to double-pulse resolution, which is not the same as arbitrary-pattern data transfer.
  3. [Simulations 1 and 2, Fig. 4(b), Supplementary] The manuscript states that the pulse width at 4 K is not known and simulation 1 uses a 5 ps Gaussian pulse. Simulation 2 improves the fit by adding an oscillatory component whose period (12 ps) and amplitudes are estimated by matching the experimental data; the paper also acknowledges that the filter-inductor model in the Supplementary is only approximate and that a complete FEM simulation is beyond scope. Thus the simulation does not independently establish that the odd-plateau remnants are harmless filter artifacts rather than a source of pattern-dependent errors. This does not weaken the direct observation of plateau structure, but it weakens the physical interpretation used to justify the 17 ps threshold.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and concluding paragraph] The phrase 'data transfer up to 60 Gbit/s' should be qualified as an inferred upper bound from double-pulse resolution unless a BER or pseudorandom-pattern measurement is added. As written, it overstates what the experiment directly demonstrates.
  2. [Page 4, 'dampening'] The word 'dampening' should be 'damped' when describing oscillatory features.
  3. [Reference [24]] The Supplementary Material reference still contains '[url to be inserted]'; the final version must include the actual URL.
  4. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 captions] Simulation panels use the normalized pulse integral p on the horizontal axis while experimental panels use Q_PD. The text notes the scaling is unknown, but the captions should state this explicitly so that readers do not quantitatively compare axes directly.
  5. [Page 4, sentence beginning 'The 12 ps time interval...'] This sentence attributes the 12 ps period to a PD-to-JJA round-trip time, while the filter-coil simulation suggests a different mechanism. This is speculative and should be flagged as such or removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the 60 Gbit/s claim rests on a direct experimental double-pulse crossover measurement, not on fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central data-rate claim ('reliable data transfer into JAWS system is feasible up to about 1/17 ps = 60 GHz') is based on the experimentally measured Shapiro-plateau structure in Fig. 4(a): the crossover from odd plateaus to even-only plateaus as the double-pulse separation Δt increases. The threshold Δt = 17 ps is read from the measured data, not derived from the simulations or from fitted parameters. Simulation 2 is indeed fit to the oscillatory features ('the time interval of the oscillations, 12 ps, and the amplitudes were estimated by matching the resulting simulation data to those of Fig. 4(a)'), but it is used only to interpret the origin of the v=1 plateau extension, not to set the data-rate threshold. The self-citations to Ref. [16] for the double-pulse method and to the VTT simulator's Supplementary Material provide methodological provenance; they do not supply the load-bearing quantitative result. The skeptic's concerns — the post hoc 'nonessential' threshold, odd-plateau remnants up to ~40 ps, the absence of a bit-error measurement, and the fact that double-pulse averaging is not an arbitrary-pattern test — are correctness/interpretation risks, not circularity. The derivation chain is therefore not equivalent to its inputs by construction. Score 1 reflects minor, non-load-bearing self-citation rather than any circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central measurement itself is direct and does not depend on fitted quantities, but the conversion of the double-pulse crossover into a 60 Gbit/s data rate relies on the methodological axioms listed above, and the interpretation of the observed oscillations relies on fitted simulation parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • data-rate threshold Delta-t* = about 17 ps
    The central claim 1/17 ps = 60 Gbit/s is set by choosing the point beyond which odd Shapiro plateaus are judged "nonessential"; the criterion is qualitative and post hoc.
  • simulation-2 oscillation period = 12 ps
    The phenomenological simulation adds current-source oscillations with a 12 ps period; the period was estimated by matching simulated data to Fig. 4(a), not from an independent measurement.
  • simulation-2 oscillation amplitudes = not listed individually
    The amplitudes of the added oscillations were estimated by matching simulation output to the measured oscillatory odd-plateau features.
  • Gaussian pulse width in simulation 1 = 5 ps FWHM assumed; longer pulses also tried
    The actual optical pulse width at 4 K was not measured; the authors state that the mismatch at Delta-t = 14 ps can be mitigated by simulating with unexpectedly long pulses.
  • p_to_Q_PD scale factor = unknown
    Simulation axes use the normalized pulse integral p, expected to correspond roughly to Q_PD with an unknown scaling factor, as acknowledged in the caption of Fig. 3.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Josephson voltage relation V = N s(t) Phi_0 f_pulse(t) for a quantized array driven by current pulses.
    Invoked in the introduction and used to normalize measured voltage as v = V/(N Phi_0 f_period); this is the standard Shapiro-step quantization.
  • domain assumption The overdamped-junction condition beta_c = (fc/fp)^2 < 1 is required for correct JAWS operation.
    Used to justify externally shunted SIS junctions as suitable; assumes the Stewart-McCumber model applies to these junctions.
  • domain assumption The double-pulse experiment's ability to separate two equal pulses, visible as even-only Shapiro plateaus, is a valid proxy for arbitrary bit-pattern data transfer at rate 1/Delta-t.
    This is the methodological bridge from the measured two-pulse crossover to the 60 Gbit/s data-rate claim; it is not derived or separately validated with a full bit sequence.
  • domain assumption The RCSJ model used in the VTT simulator describes the JJA dynamics at 4 K.
    All supporting simulations rely on the standard resistively and capacitively shunted junction model with Gaussian current pulses; no independent experimental validation of the model is provided beyond the measurements being fit.
  • domain assumption The measured average photocurrent gives the pulse charge Q_PD = I_PD/f_period that is delivered to the JJA with a known division between input and termination resistors.
    The paper notes the division is non-trivial due to the nonlinear impedance of the JJs, and the simulations use an approximate scaling factor.

pith-pipeline@v1.4.0-alltime-deepseek-medium · 11108 in / 14516 out tokens · 153697 ms · 2026-08-05T05:36:45.063387+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast optical data transfer into a Josephson junction array." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FPYT7F6K

@misc{pith2026250905074,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast optical data transfer into a Josephson junction array},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FPYT7F6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05074}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We employ externally shunted Nb-AlO$_x$-Nb Josephson junctions for demonstrating a circuit that is suitable for an optically driven Josephson Arbitrary Waveform Synthesizer (JAWS). This technology enables overdamped junctions with characteristic frequencies above 100 GHz and critical currents of the order of 100 $\mu$A, which is promising, e.g., for low-dissipation optical control of quantum circuits such as superconducting quantum bits. Here we utilize a double-pulse technique to experimentally determine the maximum rate at which optical pulse data can be reliably delivered to the superconducting circuit. We demonstrate the feasibility of data transfer up to 60 Gbit/s, which is about factor 4 higher than for typical JAWS.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05074 by A. Kemppinen, E. Mykk\"anen, E. T. Mannila, H. Syst\"a, J. Govenius, J. Nissil\"a, J. Senior, J.-W. Lee, K. Kohop\"a\"a, K. Langi, M. Bieler, M. Kiviranta, M. Ribeiro, O. Kieler, P. Selvasundaram, P. Sethi, R. Loreto, S. Ahopelto, S. Kafanov, T. Fordell, T. Rantanen, V. Vesterinen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of cross-cut layer structure of nio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Depiction of producing double pulses. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the voltage plateaus at Idc = 0 when ∆t and QPD are varied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Raicu, T

    N. Raicu, T. Hogan, X. Wu, M. Vahidpour, D. Snow, M. Hollister, and M. Field, Cryogenic Thermal Mod- eling of Microwave High Density Signaling (2025), arXiv:2502.01945 [quant-ph] version: 2

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Physical Review A86, 032324 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Mohseni, A

    M. Mohseni, A. Scherer, K. G. Johnson, O. Wertheim, M. Otten, N. A. Aadit, Y. Alexeev, K. M. Bresniker, K. Y. Camsari, B. Chapman, S. Chatterjee, G. A. Dag- new, A. Esposito, F. Fahim, M. Fiorentino, A. Gajjar, A. Khalid, X. Kong, B. Kulchytskyy, E. Kyoseva, R. Li, P. A. Lott, I. L. Markov, R. F. McDermott, G. Pe- dretti, P. Rao, E. Rieffel, A. Silva, J. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Sustainable Quantum Computing: Opportunities and Challenges of Benchmarking Carbon in the Quantum Computing Lifecycle

    N. Arora and P. Kumar, Sustainable Quantum Com- puting: Opportunities and Challenges of Benchmark- ing Carbon in the Quantum Computing Lifecycle (2024), arXiv:2408.05679 [quant-ph] version: 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Lecocq, F

    F. Lecocq, F. Quinlan, K. Cicak, J. Aumentado, S. A. Diddams, and J. D. Teufel, Control and readout of a superconducting qubit using a photonic link, Nature591, 575 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    K. K. Likharev and V. K. Semenov, RSFQ logic/memory family: a new Josephson-junction technology for sub- terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems, Applied Su- perconductivity, IEEE Transactions on1, 3 (1991), num- ber: 1

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    McDermott and M

    R. McDermott and M. Vavilov, Accurate Qubit Control with Single Flux Quantum Pulses, Physical Review Ap- plied2, 014007 (2014), publisher: American Physical So- ciety

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    P. J. Liebermann and F. K. Wilhelm, Optimal Qubit Control Using Single-Flux Quantum Pulses, Physical Re- view Applied6, 024022 (2016), publisher: American 6 Physical Society

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    McDermott, M

    R. McDermott, M. G. Vavilov, B. L. T. Plourde, F. K. Wilhelm, P. J. Liebermann, O. A. Mukhanov, and T. A. Ohki, Quantum–classical interface based on single flux quantum digital logic, Quantum Science and Technology 3, 024004 (2018), number: 2

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Leonard, M

    E. Leonard, M. A. Beck, J. Nelson, B. Christensen, T. Thorbeck, C. Howington, A. Opremcak, I. Pech- enezhskiy, K. Dodge, N. Dupuis, M. Hutchings, J. Ku, F. Schlenker, J. Suttle, C. Wilen, S. Zhu, M. Vavilov, B. Plourde, and R. McDermott, Digital Coherent Con- trol of a Superconducting Qubit, Physical Review Ap- plied11, 014009 (2019), number: 1

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    K. Li, R. McDermott, and M. G. Vavilov, Hardware- Efficient Qubit Control with Single-Flux-Quantum Pulse Sequences, Physical Review Applied12, 014044 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    C. Liu, A. Ballard, D. Olaya, D. Schmidt, J. Biesecker, T. Lucas, J. Ullom, S. Patel, O. Rafferty, A. Opremcak, K. Dodge, V. Iaia, T. McBroom, J. DuBois, P. Hop- kins, S. Benz, B. Plourde, and R. McDermott, Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconduct- ing Qubits in a Multichip Module, PRX Quantum4, 030310 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    S. P. Benz and C. A. Hamilton, A pulse-driven pro- grammable Josephson voltage standard, Applied Physics Letters68, 3171 (1996), number: 22 Publisher: Ameri- can Institute of Physics

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    O. F. Kieler, J. Kohlmann, R. Behr, F. Muller, L. Palafox, and J. Niemeyer, SNS Josephson Junction Series Arrays for the Josephson Arbitrary Waveform Syn- thesizer, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductiv- ity17, 187 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Urano, N

    C. Urano, N. Kaneko, M. Maezawa, T. Itatani, and S. Kiryu, Pulse driven Josephson voltage standard using modulated optical comb, Journal of Physics: Conference Series97, 012269 (2008), publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Nissil¨ a, T

    J. Nissil¨ a, T. Fordell, K. Kohop¨ a¨ a, E. Mykk¨ anen, P. Im- monen, R. N. Jabdaraghi, E. Bardalen, O. Kieler, B. Karlsen, P. A. Øhlckers, R. Behr, A. J. Manninen, J. Govenius, and A. Kemppinen, Driving a low criti- cal current Josephson junction array with a mode-locked laser, Applied Physics Letters119, 032601 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Kieler, B

    O. Kieler, B. Karlsen, P. A. Ohlckers, E. Bardalen, M. N. Akram, R. Behr, J. Ireland, J. Williams, H. Malmbekk, L. Palafox, and R. Wendisch, Optical Pulse-Drive for the Pulse-Driven AC Josephson Voltage Standard, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity29, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    A. A. Babenko, N. E. Flowers-Jacobs, G. Lasser, J. A. Brevik, A. E. Fox, P. D. Dresselhaus, Z. Popovi´ c, and S. P. Benz, A Microwave Quantum-Defined Millivolt Source, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques69, 5404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    S. P. Benz, J. Biesecker, C. J. Burroughs, M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, P. D. Dresselhaus, N. E. Flowers- Jacobs, A. E. Fox, P. F. Hopkins, R. Johnson-Wilke, D. Olaya, A. R¨ ufenacht, A. J. Sirois, and J. N. Thomas, AC metrology applications of the Josephson effect, Ap- plied Physics Letters125, 050501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L. Howe, M. Castellanos-Beltran, A. J. Sirois, D. Olaya, J. Biesecker, P. D. Dresselhaus, S. P. Benz, and P. F. Hopkins, Digital control of a superconducting qubit using a Josephson pulse generator at 3 K, arXiv:2111.12778 [quant-ph] (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, A. J. Sirois, L. Howe, D. Olaya, J. Biesecker, S. P. Benz, and P. F. Hopkins, Coherence-limited digital control of a superconducting qubit using a Josephson pulse generator at 3 K, Applied Physics Letters122, 192602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    A. J. Sirois, M. Castellanos-Beltran, A. E. Fox, S. P. Benz, and P. F. Hopkins, Josephson Microwave Sources Applied to Quantum Information Systems, IEEE Trans- actions on Quantum Engineering1, 1 (2020), conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Gr¨ onberg, M

    L. Gr¨ onberg, M. Kiviranta, V. Vesterinen, J. Lehti- nen, S. Simbierowicz, J. Luomahaara, M. Prunnila, and J. Hassel, Side-wall spacer passivated sub-µm Josephson junction fabrication process, Superconductor Science and Technology30, 125016 (2017), number: 12

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    See Supplementary Material [url to be inserted] for addi- tional details about measurements and simulations

    work page

  25. [25]

    com/product_category/ultrafast_ingaas/, accessed: 2025-08

    Albis: Ultrafast InGaAs PD,https://www.albisopto. com/product_category/ultrafast_ingaas/, accessed: 2025-08

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    In-situ electro-optic sampling of microwave signals under cryogenic conditions and for superconducting applications

    S. Priyadarshi, R. Ferizaj, O. Kieler, A. F. Scarioni, J. Felgner, A. Widaa, J. Kohlmann, T. Fordell, J. Nis- sil¨ a, A. Kemppinen, and M. Bieler, In-situ electro- optic sampling of microwave signals under cryogenic conditions and for superconducting applications (2025), arXiv:2411.00162 [physics]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Priyadarshi, H

    S. Priyadarshi, H. Tian, A. Fernandez Scarioni, S. Wolter, O. Kieler, J. Kohlmann, J. Nissil¨ a, and M. Bieler, Cryogenic Fiber-coupled Electro-optic Char- acterization Platform for High-speed Photodiodes,45, 159 (2024). 7 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL Measurements Measurement of voltage plateaus Traditional dc voltage characterization measurements of Josephs...

    work page 2024