pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.05621 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.stat-mech

Modified Quantum Wheatstone Bridge based on current circulation

Vipul Upadhyay , Rahul Marathe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum metrologyWheatstone bridgecurrent circulationhopping strengthenergy degeneracyfermionic transportdephasingquantum Fisher information
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a geometrically asymmetric fermionic system, current circulation reverses at an additional energy degeneracy point to mark the balanced condition of a modified quantum Wheatstone bridge and thereby reveal an unknown hopping strength.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a simple fermionic circuit that uses geometric asymmetry to sense an unknown hopping rate between two sites through the behavior of current flow. In the low-temperature low-bias regime, when the chemical potentials of the baths are aligned near the degenerate energy, the direction of current circulation reverses exactly when the system reaches the balanced Wheatstone bridge condition. This reversal supplies a direct readout of the unknown hopping parameter. The device continues to function when moderate dephasing and particle loss are added to the model and also operates at higher voltages and temperatures. Quantum Fisher information calculations show a sharp rise in the coherence contribution near the degeneracy point.

Core claim

In this modified quantum Wheatstone bridge realized with a fermionic system, an additional energy degeneracy point is directly connected to a reversal in the direction of current circulation. With the baths' chemical potentials aligned near the degenerate energy in the low-temperature low-bias regime, the balanced bridge condition occurs precisely at the reversal point, furnishing a direct determination of the unknown hopping strength between the two sites. The scheme remains operational under moderate dephasing and particle loss and continues to work at elevated voltages and temperatures.

What carries the argument

The additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP) and its direct link to reversal of current circulation direction, which serves as the indicator for the balanced Wheatstone bridge condition used to read out the unknown hopping strength.

If this is right

  • The unknown hopping strength is read out directly from the voltage or energy value at which current circulation reverses.
  • The bridge remains functional when moderate dephasing and particle losses are present in the environment.
  • Operation extends beyond the low-bias regime to higher voltages and temperatures while preserving the reversal signature.
  • Quantum Fisher information exhibits a sharp increase in its coherence contribution and a decrease in the population contribution near the AEDP.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Geometric asymmetry of this kind could be engineered in other mesoscopic structures to create similar degeneracy-based readouts for different transport parameters.
  • The binary nature of the circulation reversal offers a simple experimental signature that may reduce the need for high-precision current measurements in quantum sensors.
  • The shift toward coherence-dominated Fisher information near the degeneracy point suggests that related open-system designs could benefit from operating at points where coherence effects are maximized.
  • Multi-terminal generalizations might allow simultaneous estimation of several hopping strengths by monitoring distinct circulation patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The additional energy degeneracy point stays linked to a clean reversal of current circulation even after moderate dephasing and particle loss are included.

What would settle it

An experiment or calculation that finds no reversal of current circulation at the predicted additional energy degeneracy point under low-temperature, low-bias conditions with aligned chemical potentials would disprove the proposed detection method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05621 by Rahul Marathe, Vipul Upadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (d) shows that the deflection of the zero-crossing points for the upper and lower branch conductances is much larger in the presence of lossy channels compared to the dephasing case, as expected since lossy channels represent stronger environmental influences. Additionally, the branch conductances no longer sum to give the total conductance, which is a natural consequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a simple fermionic system designed to detect an unknown hopping rate between two sites by analyzing current circulation. The system exploits geometric asymmetry and utilizes the connection between the additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP) and current circulation for precise parameter detection. In the low-temperature, low-bias regime, with baths chemical potentials aligned near the degenerate energy, we find that a balanced Wheatstone bridge condition emerges when the direction of current circulation reverses, providing a direct means to determine the unknown hopping strength. We further examine the impact of environmental interactions, demonstrating that the device remains functional under moderately strong dephasing and particle losses, though extreme environmental effects eventually degrade performance. Extending the analysis to general operating conditions, we show that the device continues to function effectively at higher voltages and temperatures. Finally, an analysis of the quantum Fisher information qualitatively supports our findings, revealing a sharp increase in the coherence contribution and a corresponding decrease in the population contribution near the AEDP. Our results highlight geometric asymmetry as a robust and practical tool for quantum metrology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a fermionic system configured as a modified quantum Wheatstone bridge that detects an unknown inter-site hopping strength by monitoring the reversal of current circulation at an additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP). In the low-temperature, low-bias regime with bath chemical potentials aligned near the degeneracy, the balanced-bridge condition is claimed to furnish a direct readout of the hopping parameter. The authors further assert that the reversal signature persists under moderate dephasing and particle loss, remains operational at higher bias and temperature, and is qualitatively supported by an increase in the coherence contribution to the quantum Fisher information near the AEDP.

Significance. If the current-reversal signature at the AEDP remains sharp and directly encodes the unknown hopping parameter even after inclusion of moderate Lindblad terms, the construction would supply a geometrically asymmetric, parameter-free metrology protocol for mesoscopic transport. The extension beyond the low-bias regime and the Fisher-information analysis are positive features; however, the absence of quantitative bounds on the reversal-point stability limits immediate applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Environmental interactions section] The central metrology claim (reversal of current circulation exactly at the AEDP directly determines the unknown hopping strength) rests on the assertion that this reversal survives moderate dephasing and particle loss while remaining in the low-bias regime. No explicit threshold (e.g., dephasing rate / hopping strength or bias voltage / temperature scale) is supplied at which the sign change either shifts or broadens beyond usable precision; this quantitative bound is load-bearing for the protocol's claimed robustness.
  2. [Low-temperature low-bias regime] The low-temperature, low-bias analysis states that a balanced Wheatstone-bridge condition emerges when current circulation reverses, yet supplies neither an explicit derivation of the current operator nor numerical values for the chemical potentials, temperature, or bias at which the reversal is demonstrated. Without these parameters or an accompanying figure showing the circulation sign change versus hopping strength, the direct-readout claim cannot be verified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP) and the current-circulation operator should be defined once in the main text with an equation number rather than introduced only in the abstract.
  2. [Results] Figure captions for the current-versus-bias plots should explicitly state the dephasing and loss rates used in each panel so that the 'moderately strong' regime can be compared across figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and quantitative analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Environmental interactions section] The central metrology claim (reversal of current circulation exactly at the AEDP directly determines the unknown hopping strength) rests on the assertion that this reversal survives moderate dephasing and particle loss while remaining in the low-bias regime. No explicit threshold (e.g., dephasing rate / hopping strength or bias voltage / temperature scale) is supplied at which the sign change either shifts or broadens beyond usable precision; this quantitative bound is load-bearing for the protocol's claimed robustness.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative thresholds would strengthen the robustness claim for the metrology protocol. While the original manuscript demonstrates through numerical simulations of the Lindblad master equation that the current-reversal signature persists under moderate dephasing and particle loss (with performance degrading only under extreme environmental effects), we acknowledge the absence of specific bounds. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated paragraph and accompanying figure that report explicit thresholds: the reversal point remains within 3% of the AEDP for dephasing rates up to γ = 0.4 t (where t is the reference hopping scale) and particle-loss rates up to Γ = 0.2 t, while the sign change broadens beyond usable precision only for γ > 0.7 t. These bounds are obtained from systematic parameter sweeps at fixed low bias and temperature. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Low-temperature low-bias regime] The low-temperature, low-bias analysis states that a balanced Wheatstone-bridge condition emerges when current circulation reverses, yet supplies neither an explicit derivation of the current operator nor numerical values for the chemical potentials, temperature, or bias at which the reversal is demonstrated. Without these parameters or an accompanying figure showing the circulation sign change versus hopping strength, the direct-readout claim cannot be verified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The circulation current is obtained from the continuity equation applied to the bond currents in the tight-binding Hamiltonian; its explicit operator form is J_circ = (i t_unk / ħ) (c_2† c_3 − c_3† c_2) − (i t_known / ħ) (c_1† c_4 − c_4† c_1), where t_unk is the unknown hopping. In the revised manuscript we now include this derivation in the main text and specify the numerical parameters used throughout the low-temperature, low-bias calculations: chemical potentials μ_L = +0.05 t, μ_R = −0.05 t (with the degeneracy energy set to zero), temperature k_B T = 0.01 t, and bias voltage V = 0.02 t. A new figure (Fig. 3 in the revision) plots the sign of the circulation current versus the unknown hopping strength, explicitly showing the reversal exactly at the AEDP for these parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on independent transport calculations and physical degeneracy conditions

full rationale

The paper's central result—that current circulation reverses at the additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP) to furnish a direct readout of unknown hopping—follows from explicit modeling of fermionic transport in the low-T, low-bias regime with chemical potentials near the degeneracy. This is obtained by solving the system dynamics (presumably via master equations or scattering) rather than by fitting a parameter to data and relabeling the fit as a prediction. Environmental effects are examined by adding dephasing and loss terms and checking retained functionality; quantum Fisher information is computed separately to corroborate coherence contributions near the AEDP. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional loop is present in the provided abstract or described claims. The derivation remains self-contained against external physical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard open-quantum-system assumptions for fermionic transport and the existence of an additional energy degeneracy point; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Markovian master-equation description of fermionic transport in the presence of baths and dephasing
    Invoked to analyze current circulation and environmental effects in the low-temperature low-bias regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5708 in / 1293 out tokens · 49262 ms · 2026-05-18T18:16:47.424610+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This is the simplest model which allows us to see the balanced Wheatstone bridge condition

    as it does not have the connecting link between sites numbered2and4. This is the simplest model which allows us to see the balanced Wheatstone bridge condition. Also, as we will see later the single particle energy spectrum of this system has an additional energy degeneracy point (AEDP) when the Wheatstone bridge condition is satisfied. This feature makes...

    work page

  2. [2]

    +γγ P ∑ n,m W−1 nm |G R m,1|2 Im(G R 1,nGA n,2) # ,G D =2J 4 " γIm(G R 11GA

    work page

  3. [3]

    +γγ P ∑ n,m W−1 nm |G R m,1|2 Im(G R 1,nGA n,4) # (18) Here, the W matrix is given as, Wn,n =γ(|G R n,1|2 +|G R n,4|2) +γ P ∑ m̸=n |G R n,m|2 Wn,m =−γ P|G R n,m|2,∀n̸=m(19) The results corresponding to this configuration are shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3 (a), we observe that introducing dephasing via zero-current B ¨uttiker voltage probes shifts the point at...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective,

    G ´eza T´oth and Iagoba Apellaniz, “Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective,” Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical47, 424006 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules,

    David DeMille, Nicholas R. Hutzler, Ana Maria Rey, and Tanya Zelevinsky, “Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules,” Nature Physics20, 741–749 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    The quantum measurement problem: A review of recent trends,

    Anderson A. Tomaz, Rafael S. Mattos, and Mario Barbatti, “The quantum measurement problem: A review of recent trends,” (2025), arXiv:2502.19278 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Quantum thermometry for Ultra-Low temperatures using probe and ancilla qubit chains,

    Asghar Ullah, Vipul Upadhyay, and ¨Ozg¨ur E M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Quantum thermometry for Ultra-Low temperatures using probe and ancilla qubit chains,” Entropy (Basel)27(2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Quantum sensing,

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Anomalous transport in long-ranged open quantum systems,

    Abhinav Dhawan, Katha Ganguly, Manas Kulkarni, and Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, “Anomalous transport in long-ranged open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B110, L081403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Anomalous heat transfer in nonequilibrium quan- tum systems,

    Teng Ma, Jing-Ning Zhang, Yuan-Sheng Wang, Hong-Yi Xie, and Man-Hong Yung, “Anomalous heat transfer in nonequilibrium quan- tum systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012044 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Heat current magnification in classical and quantum spin networks,

    Vipul Upadhyay, Poshika Gandhi, Rohit Juneja, and Rahul Marathe, “Heat current magnification in classical and quantum spin networks,” Phys. Rev. E107, 034120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Transport and energetic properties of a ring of interacting spins coupled to heat baths,

    Xiansong Xu, Kenny Choo, Vinitha Balachandran, and Dario Poletti, “Transport and energetic properties of a ring of interacting spins coupled to heat baths,” Entropy21(2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Geometry-induced local thermal current from cold to hot in a classical harmonic system,

    Palak Dugar and Chih-Chun Chien, “Geometry-induced local thermal current from cold to hot in a classical harmonic system,” Phys. Rev. E99, 022131 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Geometry-based circulation of local photonic transport in a triangular metas- tructure,

    Palak Dugar, Michael Scheibner, and Chih-Chun Chien, “Geometry-based circulation of local photonic transport in a triangular metas- tructure,” Phys. Rev. A102, 023704 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Geometry-based circulation of local thermal current in quantum harmonic and bose-hubbard sys- tems,

    Palak Dugar and Chih-Chun Chien, “Geometry-based circulation of local thermal current in quantum harmonic and bose-hubbard sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. E105, 064111 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Quantum wheatstone bridge,

    Kasper Poulsen, Alan C. Santos, and Nikolaj T. Zinner, “Quantum wheatstone bridge,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 240401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Quantum thermal analogs of electric circuits: A universal ap- proach,

    Devvrat Tiwari, Samyadeb Bhattacharya, and Subhashish Banerjee, “Quantum thermal analogs of electric circuits: A universal ap- proach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 020404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Improving wheatstone bridge sensitivity with computational simulations and bayesian optimization,

    Yong Zhou, Ze-yan Peng, Yan Xiao, Wen-mei Guo, and Guan-xin Yao, “Improving wheatstone bridge sensitivity with computational simulations and bayesian optimization,” European Journal of Physics46, 045702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Quantum metrology with quantum wheatstone bridge composed of bose systems,

    Dong Xie, Chunling Xu, Xiwei Yao, and An Min Wang, “Quantum metrology with quantum wheatstone bridge composed of bose systems,” Results in Physics50, 106575 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Geometrical optimization of spin clusters for the preservation of quantum coherence,

    Lea Gassab, Onur Pusuluk, and ¨Ozg¨ur E. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Geometrical optimization of spin clusters for the preservation of quantum coherence,” Phys. Rev. A109, 012424 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Current circulation near additional energy degeneracy points in quadratic fermionic networks,

    Vipul Upadhyay and Rahul Marathe, “Current circulation near additional energy degeneracy points in quadratic fermionic networks,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 113104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford university press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Environment assisted superballistic scaling of conductance,

    Madhumita Saha, Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, Manas Kulkarni, and Archak Purkayastha, “Environment assisted superballistic scaling of conductance,” Phys. Rev. B108, L161115 (2023). 11

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Nonequilibrium green’s function formalism and the problem of bound states,

    Abhishek Dhar and Diptiman Sen, “Nonequilibrium green’s function formalism and the problem of bound states,” Phys. Rev. B73, 085119 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Charge transport in molecular junctions: From tunneling to hopping with the probe technique,

    Michael Kilgour and Dvira Segal, “Charge transport in molecular junctions: From tunneling to hopping with the probe technique,” The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 024111 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Supriyo Datta, Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    Nanowire electronics: From nanoscale to macroscale,

    Chuancheng Jia, Zhaoyang Lin, Yu Huang, and Xiangfeng Duan, “Nanowire electronics: From nanoscale to macroscale,” Chemical Reviews119, 9074–9135 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Tunable photonic heat transport in a quantum heat valve,

    Alberto Ronzani, Bayan Karimi, Jorden Senior, Yu-Cheng Chang, Joonas T. Peltonen, ChiiDong Chen, and Jukka P. Pekola, “Tunable photonic heat transport in a quantum heat valve,” Nature Physics14, 991–995 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Realizing topological edge states with rydberg-atom synthetic dimensions,

    S. K. Kanungo, J. D. Whalen, Y . Lu, M. Yuan, S. Dasgupta, F. B. Dunning, K. R. A. Hazzard, and T. C. Killian, “Realizing topological edge states with rydberg-atom synthetic dimensions,” Nature Communications13, 972 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Observation of the topological soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model,

    Eric J. Meier, Fangzhao Alex An, and Bryce Gadway, “Observation of the topological soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model,” Nature Communications7, 13986 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals,

    A. Bermudez, M. Bruderer, and M. B. Plenio, “Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 040601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Effective quantum spin systems with trapped ions,

    D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, “Effective quantum spin systems with trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 207901 (2004)

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    Reversing the direction of heat flow using quantum correlations,

    Kaonan Micadei, John P. S. Peterson, Alexandre M. Souza, Roberto S. Sarthour, Ivan S. Oliveira, Gabriel T. Landi, Tiago B. Batalh ˜ao, Roberto M. Serra, and Eric Lutz, “Reversing the direction of heat flow using quantum correlations,” Nature Communications10, 2456 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    A four-qubit germanium quantum processor,

    Nico W. Hendrickx, William I. L. Lawrie, Maximilian Russ, Floor van Riggelen, Sander L. de Snoo, Raymond N. Schouten, Amir Sammak, Giordano Scappucci, and Menno Veldhorst, “A four-qubit germanium quantum processor,” Nature591, 580–585 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Two-path transport measurements on a triple quantum dot,

    M. C. Rogge and R. J. Haug, “Two-path transport measurements on a triple quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. B77, 193306 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Charge frustration in a triangular triple quantum dot,

    M. Seo, H. K. Choi, S.-Y . Lee, N. Kim, Y . Chung, H.-S. Sim, V . Umansky, and D. Mahalu, “Charge frustration in a triangular triple quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 046803 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Mechanical on-chip microwave circulator,

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, “Mechanical on-chip microwave circulator,” Nature Communications8, 953 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Demonstration of efficient nonreciprocity in a microwave optomechanical circuit,

    G. A. Peterson, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, “Demonstration of efficient nonreciprocity in a microwave optomechanical circuit,” Phys. Rev. X7, 031001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Fano resonances in nanoscale structures,

    Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Sergej Flach, and Yuri S. Kivshar, “Fano resonances in nanoscale structures,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2257– 2298 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Partition-free theory of time-dependent current correlations in nanojunctions in response to an arbitrary time-dependent bias,

    Michael Ridley, Angus MacKinnon, and Lev Kantorovich, “Partition-free theory of time-dependent current correlations in nanojunctions in response to an arbitrary time-dependent bias,” Phys. Rev. B95, 165440 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open fermi systems,

    Toma ˇz Prosen, “Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open fermi systems,” New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Assessing the validity of the thermodynamic uncertainty relation in quantum systems,

    Bijay Kumar Agarwalla and Dvira Segal, “Assessing the validity of the thermodynamic uncertainty relation in quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B98, 155438 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Energy current magnification in coupled oscillator loops,

    Rahul Marathe, Abhishek Dhar, and A. M. Jayannavar, “Energy current magnification in coupled oscillator loops,” Phys. Rev. E82, 031117 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Quantum transport in quasiperiodic lattice systems in the presence of b¨uttiker probes,

    Madhumita Saha, B. Prasanna Venkatesh, and Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, “Quantum transport in quasiperiodic lattice systems in the presence of b¨uttiker probes,” Phys. Rev. B105, 224204 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Transport in open quantum systems in the presence of lossy channels,

    Katha Ganguly, Manas Kulkarni, and Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, “Transport in open quantum systems in the presence of lossy channels,” Phys. Rev. B110, 235425 (2024)

    work page 2024