Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Interlayer Coupling and Exciton Dynamics in 2D Hybrid Structures based on an InGaN Quantum Well coupled to a MoSe2 Monolayer

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A MoSe2 monolayer 1–5 nm away drains InGaN quantum-well excitons.

desk verdict Solid data on InGaN QW–MoSe2 coupling, but the distance-dependence argument for tunneling over energy transfer is not supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06547 v1 pith:DFMTLHWO submitted 2025-09-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

D. Chen , D. Lagarde , L. Hemmen , L. Lombez , P. Renucci , M. Mauguet , L. Ren , C. Robert
show 2 more authors
N. Grandjean X. Marie
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords InGaNquantumwellMoSe2monolayerexcitondynamicsdiffusionlengthcarriertunnelingtypeIIbandalignmentphotoluminescencequenching2D/III-nitridehybrids
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An InGaN quantum well loses excitons when a single MoSe2 layer is placed a few nanometers away, and the paper's claim is that the loss is controlled hole tunneling, not energy transfer. The evidence is a series of photoluminescence and time-resolved measurements: with the MoSe2 flake present, the QW emission drops by up to a factor of about three, the exciton decay time shortens, and the exciton diffusion length shrinks. The effect grows as the GaN spacer shrinks from 48 nm to 5 nm to 1 nm, and it disappears for the thick barrier. A rate-equation model reproduces the kinetics with a transfer time of about 4 ns at d=1 nm and 6 ns at d=5 nm. If correct, the result gives device designers a post-growth way to engineer exciton lifetime and transport in III-nitride quantum wells by proximity to a 2D semiconductor.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hybrid stack: a 2.4 nm In0.15Ga0.85N quantum well, a top GaN barrier of thickness d=1, 5, or 48 nm, and a hBN-encapsulated MoSe2 monolayer on the surface. The mechanism that carries the argument is carrier tunneling: under a type II band alignment, holes photogenerated in the QW escape into MoSe2 on a few-nanosecond timescale, competing with radiative recombination and exciton localization. The quantitative work is done by a rate-equation model with hot, free, and localized exciton populations and a single transfer time ttransfer, which simultaneously reproduces the decay kinetics, the spectral dependence, and the measured PL quenching factor.

What would settle it

Measure QW decay and quenching on a continuous GaN-barrier thickness series (e.g., d=2, 3, 4, 6, 10 nm) and compare transfer rates with computed Förster-transfer rates for the InGaN/MoSe2 geometry: tunneling predicts a steep exponential increase as d shrinks, whereas Förster 2D/2D transfer predicts a power-law d^-2 dependence. A direct charge check would be a build-up of trion emission or transient hole doping in MoSe2 synchronous with the QW excitation pulse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that placing a MoSe2 monolayer within 1 to 5 nm of an InGaN quantum well opens a type-II carrier-transfer channel in which holes tunnel out of the QW through the thin GaN barrier into the MoSe2 layer. This extra nonradiative path shortens the QW exciton lifetime, reduces the integrated PL intensity by a factor of about three at d=1 nm, and shortens the exciton diffusion length at temperatures above roughly 100 K. At d=48 nm no coupling is observed. The authors argue that the distance dependence—transfer times of about 6 ns at d=5 nm and 4 ns at d=1 nm—rules out Förster-like energy transfer and instead points to carrier tunneling, possibly defect-assisted, between the two

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the shortened QW decay and diffusion length come from hole tunneling into MoSe2 rather than from a distance-dependent energy-transfer or interface-loss channel; the evidence rests on just two thin barrier thicknesses (d=1 and 5 nm) and a qualitative d^-n scaling argument, with no computed Förster rates for this geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • InGaN QW exciton lifetimes can be shortened from roughly 15 ns to a few ns by placing MoSe2 1–5 nm away, giving a post-growth control knob for carrier dynamics.
  • Exciton diffusion lengths in the QW plane are reduced wherever the monolayer sits, so patterned TMD flakes could encode spatial maps of exciton mobility.
  • The coupling persists up to room temperature, making it relevant for operating LEDs, lasers, and photodetectors rather than cryogenic physics only.
  • Because the coupling is strongest for high-energy, weakly localized excitons, the QW's intrinsic disorder determines how much quenching is observed; smoother QWs should transfer faster.
  • The long-lived tail in MoSe2 emission under QW excitation is assigned to re-absorption of QW photons rather than direct charge or energy transfer, so TMD emission alone cannot be used to infer coupling strength.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A continuous barrier-thickness scan would convert the two-point tunneling claim into a full scaling law; the paper's data cannot yet distinguish exponential tunneling from a steep power law.
  • The hole-transfer picture predicts that MoSe2 should become hole-doped during QW excitation; time-resolved trion spectroscopy on the TMD could observe that transferred charge directly.
  • The same proximity control may generalize to other TMD monolayers and barrier alloys, since type-II alignment with III-nitrides is common; testing one additional TMD would show whether hole transfer times can be tuned by band offsets.
  • Because the transfer channel competes with localization, engineering the InGaN alloy disorder should change the quenching factor in a predictable way, a consequence the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a hybrid structure consisting of an InGaN quantum well (QW) coupled to a MoSe2 monolayer through a thin GaN barrier of thickness d = 1, 5, or 48 nm. Time-integrated and time-resolved micro-photoluminescence show that the presence of the MoSe2 monolayer quenches the QW emission (by a factor ~3 for d = 1 nm), shortens the QW exciton decay, and reduces the exciton diffusion length at room temperature. The authors attribute these effects to type-II band alignment and hole tunneling from the QW to the TMD layer, and they explicitly claim that the distance dependence rules out energy transfer. A three-population rate-equation model extracts transfer times of 6 ns and 4 ns for d = 5 nm and d = 1 nm, respectively.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the work demonstrates a controllable proximity effect by which a monolayer TMD can engineer the exciton lifetime and transport in an III-nitride QW, which is relevant for optoelectronic and light-harvesting applications. The experimental dataset is rich and internally consistent: PL quenching correlates with barrier thickness, TRPL shows clear lifetime reduction, the effect persists up to room temperature, and spectral and temperature dependencies support a localization-related picture. The paper also includes direct measurements of exciton diffusion and cross-checks between quenching factors and transfer rates. The main weakness is that the quantitative support for the tunneling mechanism and, especially, the exclusion of energy transfer, rests on a multi-parameter fit without uncertainties and on a generic distance-scaling argument rather than a calculated energy-transfer rate.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion, 'It also rules out an interpretation based on an energy transfer process'] This load-bearing assertion is not quantitatively supported. Only two coupled barrier thicknesses (d = 1 and 5 nm) are compared, with transfer times of 4 and 6 ns from fits. A factor 1.5 change over a 5-fold distance increase does not by itself discriminate between tunneling and energy transfer, especially since the applicability of a simple d^-n Förster law to a 2D QW exciton transferring to a monolayer TMD with a broadband continuum of acceptor states is not established. No spectral overlap integral, Förster radius, or dielectric screening calculation is presented. The manuscript later states that the tunneling mechanism is 'plausible yet unconfirmed' and that distinguishing the processes requires further study, which is inconsistent with the strong exclusion claim. Please either compute the expected energy-transfer rates for this system or soften the claim to 'consistent with tunnelin
  2. [Fig. 4c,d and rate-equation fitting] The transfer times are extracted from the same TRPL decays that are then used to validate the model, and no uncertainties are reported for te1, te2, t1, t2, or ttransfer. With six free parameters, the difference between 6 ns and 4 ns may not be statistically significant, which is critical because the distance-dependence argument relies on this difference. The consistency check that tau_plus ≈ 13 ns is also circular: it is computed from the fitted transfer time and compared with the same fitted t1 and t2. Please report confidence intervals from the fitting, perform a sensitivity analysis, and ideally validate at least one parameter (e.g., the unperturbed lifetime) with an independent measurement.
  3. [Diffusion length interpretation, L = sqrt(D*tau), Fig. 7] The reduction of the diffusion length in the presence of MoSe2 is attributed entirely to the decrease of tau under the assumption that the diffusion coefficient D is unchanged. The sentence 'We do not expect a variation of the latter' is an assumption, not a measurement. Charge transfer, interface roughness, or slight strain induced by the monolayer could in principle alter D. Since the diffusion-length reduction is used as supporting evidence for the tunneling-induced lifetime change, the assumption should be justified or relaxed, for example by measuring or estimating D independently in both regions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] The manuscript references 'Eq. (1)' when deriving tau_plus, but no numbered equation appears in the text. Please add the equation or correct the reference.
  2. [Fig. 4d] The table of fit parameters would be more useful with error bars or confidence intervals and with a clear definition of each parameter in the caption.
  3. [Section 'Interplay...', Fig. 8] The claim that the MoSe2 long-lived decay is 'unlikely to originate from energy or carrier transfer' is based on a weak d-dependence that is not shown. Please include the data or explicitly mention that it is not shown.
  4. [Abstract and text] There are numerous typographical and formatting artifacts (e.g., 'incorpora1ng', 'transi8on', missing italics). A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central observations are direct measurements, the rate-equation transfer times are fitted parameters rather than renamed predictions, and the energy-transfer exclusion is under-supported but not circular.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—PL quenching, shortened QW exciton lifetimes, and reduced diffusion length in the presence of MoSe2—rest on direct measurements made by translating the sample between regions with and without the monolayer on the same structure, with a d=48 nm control showing no effect beyond trivial absorption. The rate-equation model fits te1, te2, t1, and t2 to the no-MoSe2 decays and then fits ttransfer to the with-MoSe2 decays. These are model parameters, not independent observables, but the paper does not rename them as predictions: it explicitly labels the Q-versus-ttransfer agreement as a consistency check ('This consistency between the quenching factor and the extracted transfer rate supports the reliability of our fitting approach'). The deduced tau+ ≈ 13 ns is likewise presented as internal consistency, not as an independent confirmation. The statement that the distance dependence 'rules out an interpretation based on an energy transfer process' is not circular—it is an unsupported inference because only two coupled barrier thicknesses are compared and no expected Förster/Dexter rate is computed. That is a correctness/evidence weakness, not an equation-level reduction to the paper's inputs. Self-citations appear (e.g., refs. 11, 12, 16, 21, 25, 29, 45–47) but only for growth, measurement, or prior background; none carries the load of the central mechanistic conclusion. The paper even flags the tunneling mechanism as 'a plausible yet unconfirmed mechanism,' further showing the conclusion is not being forced tautologically. Overall, no step in the derivation is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on an assumed type II band alignment, a rate-equation model with five fitted lifetimes, and the assumption that the MoSe2 layer changes only the exciton lifetime, not the diffusion coefficient. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • te1 (hot exciton relaxation time) = 0.75 ns
    Fitted to PL decays without MoSe2; limited by the instrument response function.
  • te2 (free-to-localized relaxation time) = 3.5 ns
    Fitted to PL decays without MoSe2.
  • t1 (free exciton recombination lifetime) = ~10 ns
    Fitted to PL decays without MoSe2.
  • t2 (localized exciton recombination lifetime) = ~15 ns
    Fitted to PL decays without MoSe2.
  • ttransfer for d=5 nm = 6 ns
    Fitted to the QW decay in the presence of MoSe2, with the other lifetimes fixed.
  • ttransfer for d=1 nm = 4 ns
    Fitted to the QW decay in the presence of MoSe2 for the thinner barrier.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Type II band alignment between InGaN QW and MoSe2, with holes transferring to MoSe2.
    Invoked in the interpretation; based on prior GaN/TMD references [8-10], not measured for this specific sample.
  • ad hoc to paper Rate-equation model with hot, free, and localized exciton populations, with transfer only from hot and free states.
    Defined in Fig. 4b and used for fitting; the restriction of transfer to delocalized states is central to reproducing the spectral dependence.
  • domain assumption Exciton localization in the QW explains the S-shape energy shift and the long-delay dynamics.
    Standard InGaN behavior cited via refs [23,37].
  • domain assumption The diffusion coefficient D is unchanged by the MoSe2 monolayer.
    Stated in the text: 'We do not expect a variation of the latter with a monolayer located 5 nm from the QW.'
  • ad hoc to paper Energy transfer distance scaling d^-n is sufficient to exclude energy transfer.
    Used to rule out energy transfer based on two data points without computing expected Förster rates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interlayer Coupling and Exciton Dynamics in 2D Hybrid Structures based on an InGaN Quantum Well coupled to a MoSe2 Monolayer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DFMTLHWO

@misc{pith2026250906547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interlayer Coupling and Exciton Dynamics in 2D Hybrid Structures based on an InGaN Quantum Well coupled to a MoSe2 Monolayer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DFMTLHWO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06547}
}
read the original abstract

Hybrid structures incorpora1ng both III-nitride and Transi1on Metal Dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors have strong applica1on poten1al for light harves1ng and optoelectronics. Here we have inves1gated the proper1es of hybrid structures based on a MoSe2 monolayer coupled to an InGaN quantum well (QW). The coupling efficiency is controlled by a thin GaN barrier of variable thickness located between them. Time-integrated and 1me-resolved micro-photoluminescence experiments show a quenching of the InGaN QW exciton emission which increases with the decrease of the GaN barrier thickness d: the PL intensity is reduced by a factor 3 for d=1 nm as a consequence of carrier transfer to the MoSe2 monolayer. This interplay between the two semiconductors is confirmed by 1meresolved photoluminescence spectroscopy highligh1ng a clear reduc1on of the QW exciton life1me in the presence of the monolayer. Interes1ngly the coupling between the QW and the TMD monolayer is also demonstrated by measuring op1cally the excitonic transport proper1es in the quantum well: the exciton diffusion length decreases in the presence of the MoSe2 monolayer. The measured dependences as a func1on of temperature highlight the role played by localiza1on effects in the QW. All these results can be well interpreted by a type II band alignment between the InGaN QW and the MoSe2 monolayer and a tunneling process between the two semiconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schema8cs of the sample structure highligh8ng the two excita8on condi8ons: with (red arrow) or without (black arrow) MoSe2 ML on top of the InGaN QW. (b) Op8cal microscopy image of hBN-encapsulated MoSe2 ML deposited on the surface of the InGaN/GaN QW with d=5 nm (top view). (c) PL spectrum of the InGaN QW of the d=5 nm sample at low temperature (T=10 K), Pexc=0.5 µW@800 kHz. (d) Dependence of the exciton PL pea… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a)-(d) cw photoluminescence spectra of the MoSe2 monolayer for d=1, 5 and 48 nm, as well as in the absence of the QW (“no QW”) measured at T=10 K, Plaser=5 µW, Elaser=1.96 eV. The different colored spectra correspond to different posi8ons on the MoSe2 ML flakes. Black curve in (b) also displays the differen8al reflec8vity spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Time-integrated PL spectrum of the InGaN QW in the d=5 nm structure at T=10 K, with (w/) and without (w/o) MoSe2, (b) Evolu8on of PL quenching factor Q as a func8on of the barrier thickness d for different excita8on powers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Normalized PL dynamics of the InGaN QW exciton with different GaN surface barrier thicknesses, measured on regions without (black curves) or with (red curves) the MoSe2 ML, T=10 K, Pexc=5 µW@800 kHz; the kine8cs are taken on the spectrally integrated exciton line. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) PL spectrum of the InGaN QW with d=5 nm measured at 10 K, Pexc=5 µW@800 kHz. (b) Normalized PL dynamics of the InGaN QW spectrally-integrated in energy ranges presented in (a): blue (red) traces are taken at the low (high) energy part of the QW spectrum. Fi[ed norm…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized PL dynamics of InGaN QW exciton (red) and MoSe2 ML exciton (blue) for the d=5 nm hybrid structure. The lines are guides for the eye. Inset: Time-integrated PL spectra of the QW and MoSe2 ; T=10 K, Pexc=5 µW@800 kHz and Elaser=3.06 eV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nakamura, InGaN-based violet laser diodes, Semicond

    S. Nakamura, InGaN-based violet laser diodes, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14, R27 (1999)

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Maier, M

    D. Maier, M. Alomari, N. Grandjean, J.-F. Carlin, M.-A. Diforte-Poisson, and C. Dua, Tes8ng the Temperature Limits of GaN-Based HEMT Devices, IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Relib. 10, 427 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transi8on metal dichalcogenides, Nature Phys 10, 5 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transi8on metal dichalcogenides, Nature Photon 10, 216 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transi8on metal dichalcogenides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 2 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WS 2, Phys. Rev. Le[. 113, 076802 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    G. Wang, X. Marie, I. Gerber, T. Amand, D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, M. Vidal, A. Balocchi, and B. Urbaszek, Giant Enhancement of the Op8cal Second-Harmonic Emission of WSe 2 Monolayers by Laser Excita8on at Exciton Resonances, Phys. Rev. Le[. 114, 097403 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    S. K. Jain, R. R. Kumar, N. Aggarwal, P. Vashishtha, L. Goswami, S. Kuriakose, A. Pandey, M. Bhaskaran, S. Walia, and G. Gupta, Current Transport and Band Alignment Study of MoS2 /GaN and MoS2 /AlGaN Heterointerfaces for Broadband Photodetec8on Applica8on, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 710 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    J. Liao, B. Sa, J. Zhou, R. Ahuja, and Z. Sun, Design of High-Efficiency Visible-Light Photocatalysts for Water Spli^ng: MoS2 /AlN(GaN) Heterostructures, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 17594 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    H. K. Sandhu, J. W. John, A. Jakhar, A. Sharma, A. Jain, and S. Das, MoSe2 /n-GaN Heterojunc8on Induced High Photoconduc8ve Gain for Low-Noise Broadband Photodetec8on from Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared Wavelengths, Adv Materials Inter 9, 2102200 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    D. Chen, J. Jiang, T. F. K. Weatherley, J.-F. Carlin, M. Banerjee, and N. Grandjean, GaN Surface Passiva8on by MoS2 Coa8ng, Nano Le[. 24, 10124 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Aristegui, P

    R. Aristegui, P. Lefebvre, C. Brimont, T. Guillet, M. Vladimirova, I. Paradeisanos, C. Robert, X. Marie, B. Urbaszek, S. Chenot et al., Electrosta8c modula8on of excitonic fluid in GaN/AlGaN quantum wells by deposi8on of few-layer graphene and nickel/gold films, Phys. Rev. B 108...

    2023

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Q

    Z. Zhang, Q. Qian, B. Li, and K. J. Chen, Interface Engineering of Monolayer MoS2 /GaN Hybrid Heterostructure: Modified Band Alignment for Photocataly8c Water Spli^ng Applica8on by Nitrida8on Treatment, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 17419 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    S. K. Jain, M. X. Low, P. D. Taylor, S. A. Tawfik, M. J. S. Spencer, S. Kuriakose, A. Arash, C. Xu, S. Sriram, G. Gupta et al., 2D/3D Hybrid of MoS2 /GaN for a High-Performance Broadband Photodetector, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 2407 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    N. Goel, R. Kumar, S. K. Jain, S. Rajamani, B. Roul, G. Gupta, M. Kumar, and S. B. Krupanidhi, A high-performance hydrogen sensor based on a reverse-biased MoS2 /GaN heterojunc8on, Nanotechnology 30, 314001 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    T. F. K. Weatherley, W. Liu, V. Osokin, D. T. L. Alexander, R. A. Taylor, J.-F. Carlin, R. Bu[é, and N. Grandjean, Imaging Nonradia8ve Point Defects Buried in Quantum Wells Using 10 Cathodoluminescence, Nano Le[. 21, 5217 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Castellanos-Gomez, M

    A. Castellanos-Gomez, M. Buscema, R. Molenaar, V. Singh, L. Janssen, H. S. J. van der Zant, and G. A. Steele, Determinis8c transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelas8c stamping, 2D Mater. 1, 1 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Cadiz, E

    F. Cadiz, E. Courtade, C. Robert, G. Wang, Y. Shen, H. Cai, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. Carrere, D. Lagarde et al., Excitonic Linewidth Approaching the Homogeneous Limit in MoS 2 -Based van der Waals Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X 7, 2 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Cadiz, C

    F. Cadiz, C. Robert, G. Wang, W. Kong, X. Fan, M. Blei, D. Lagarde, M. Gay, M. Manca, T. Taniguchi et al., Ultra-low power threshold for laser induced changes in op8cal proper8es of 2D molybdenum dichalcogenides, 2D Mater. 3, 045008 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Khestanova, F

    E. Khestanova, F. Guinea, L. Fumagalli, A. K. Geim, and I. V. Grigorieva, Universal shape and pressure inside bubbles appearing in van der Waals heterostructures, Nat Commun 7, 1 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Robert, S

    C. Robert, S. Park, F. Cadiz, L. Lombez, L. Ren, H. Tornatzky, A. Rowe, D. Paget, F. Siro^, M. Yang et al., Spin/valley pumping of resident electrons in WSe2 and WS2 monolayers, Nat Commun 12, 5455 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    J. Qu, P. Rastogi, C. Gréboval, D. Lagarde, A. Chu, C. Dabard, A. Khalili, H. Cruguel, X. Z. Xu, S. Ithurria et al., Electroluminescence from HgTe Nanocrystals and Its Use for Ac8ve Imaging, Nano Le[. 20, 6185 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    S-shaped

    Y.-H. Cho, G. H. Gainer, A. J. Fischer, J. J. Song, S. Keller, U. K. Mishra, and S. P. DenBaars, “S-shaped” temperature-dependent emission shig and carrier dynamics in InGaN/GaN mul8ple quantum wells, Applied Physics Le[ers 73, 1370 (1998)

    1998

  16. [24]

    K. Hao, L. Xu, P. Nagler, A. Singh, K. Tran, C. K. Dass, C. Schüller, T. Korn, X. Li, and G. Moody, Coherent and Incoherent Coupling Dynamics between Neutral and Charged Excitons in Monolayer MoSe2, Nano Le[. 16, 5109 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    H. H. Fang, B. Han, C. Robert, M. A. Semina, D. Lagarde, E. Courtade, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Amand, B. Urbaszek et al., Control of the Exciton Radia8ve Life8me in van der Waals Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Le[. 123, 067401 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    J. S. Ross, S. Wu, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, A. M. Jones, G. Aivazian, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, W. Yao and X. Xu, Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nat Commun 4, 1474 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    G. Wang, I. C. Gerber, L. Bouet, D. Lagarde, A. Balocchi, M. Vidal, T. Amand, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Exciton states in monolayer MoSe 2 : impact on interband transi8ons, 2D Mater. 2, 4 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    P. Back, S. Zey8noglu, A. Ijaz, M. Kroner, and A. Imamoğlu, Realiza8on of an Electrically Tunable Narrow-Bandwidth Atomically Thin Mirror Using Monolayer MoSe 2, Phys. Rev. Le[. 120, 037401 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    L. Ren, C. Robert, M. Glazov, M. Semina, T. Amand, L. Lombez, D. Lagarde, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and X. Marie, Control of the Bright-Dark Exciton Spli^ng Using the Lamb Shig in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Le[. 131, 116901 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Cadiz, C

    F. Cadiz, C. Robert, E. Courtade, M. Manca, L. Mar8nelli, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Amand, A. C. H. Rowe, D. Paget et al., Exciton diffusion in WSe2 monolayers embedded in a van der Waals heterostructure, Appl. Phys. Le[. 112, 15 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    David, Long-Range Carrier Diffusion in ( In , Ga ) N Quantum Wells and Implica8ons from Fundamentals to Devices, Phys

    A. David, Long-Range Carrier Diffusion in ( In , Ga ) N Quantum Wells and Implica8ons from Fundamentals to Devices, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 054015 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Kulig, J

    M. Kulig, J. Zipfel, P. Nagler, S. Blanter, C. Schüller, T. Korn, N. Paradiso, M. M. Glazov, and A. Chernikov, Exciton Diffusion and Halo Effects in Monolayer Semiconductors, Phys. 11 Rev. Le[. 120, 20 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Becht, U

    C. Becht, U. T. Schwarz, M. Binder, and B. Galler, Diffusion Analysis of Charge Carriers in InGaN/GaN Heterostructures by Microphotoluminescence, Physica Status Solidi (b) 260, 2200565 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Solowan, J

    H.-M. Solowan, J. Danhof, and U. T. Schwarz, Direct Observa8on of Charge Carrier Diffusion and Localiza8on in an InGaN Mul8 Quantum Well, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 08JK07 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    W. Liu, C. Haller, Y. Chen, T. Weatherley, J.-F. Carlin, G. Jacopin, R. Bu[é, and N. Grandjean, Impact of defects on Auger recombina8on in c -plane InGaN/GaN single quantum well in the efficiency droop regime, Applied Physics Le[ers 116, 222106 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    S. F. Chichibu, A. C. Abare, M. P. Mack, M. S. Minsky, T. Deguchi, D. Cohen, P. Kozodoy, S. B. Fleischer, S. Kelly, J. S. Speck et al., Op8cal proper8es of InGaN quantum wells, Materials Science and Engineering: B 59, 298 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    Feng, Y.-C

    S.-W. Feng, Y.-C. Cheng, Y.-Y. Chung, C. C. Yang, Y.-S. Lin, C. Hsu, K.-J. Ma, and J.-I. Chyi, Impact of localized states on the recombina8on dynamics in InGaN/GaN quantum well structures, Journal of Applied Physics 92, 4441 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    Förster and Th

    Th. Förster and Th. Forster, Transfer Mechanisms of Electronic Excita8on Energy, Radia8on Research Supplement 2, 326 (1960)

    1960

  31. [39]

    Achermann, M

    M. Achermann, M. A. Petruska, S. Kos, D. L. Smith, D. D. Koleske, and V. I. Klimov, Energy-transfer pumping of semiconductor nanocrystals using an epitaxial quantum well, Nature 429, 642 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Froehlicher, E

    G. Froehlicher, E. Lorchat, and S. Berciaud, Charge Versus Energy Transfer in Atomically Thin Graphene-Transi8on Metal Dichalcogenide van der Waals Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011007 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    W. L. Barnes, Fluorescence near interfaces: The role of photonic mode density, Journal of Modern Op8cs 45, 661 (1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    Gaudreau, K

    L. Gaudreau, K. J. Tielrooij, G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo, J. Osmond, F. J. G. De Abajo, and F. H. L. Koppens, Universal Distance-Scaling of Nonradia8ve Energy Transfer to Graphene, Nano Le[. 13, 2030 (2013)

  35. [43]

    Kang and S.-B

    B. Kang and S.-B. Kim, Temperature Dependence of the Component Currents and Internal Quantum Efficiency in Blue Light-Emi^ng Diodes, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60, 1060 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Mandurrino, G

    M. Mandurrino, G. Verzellesi, M. Goano, M. Vallone, F. Bertazzi, G. Ghione, M. Meneghini, G. Meneghesso, and E. Zanoni, Physics-based modeling and experimental implica8ons of trap-assisted tunneling in InGaN/GaN light-emi^ng diodes, Physica Status Solidi (a) 212, 947 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    T. Korn, S. Heydrich, M. Hirmer, J. Schmutzler, and C. Schüller, Low-temperature photocarrier dynamics in monolayer MoS2, Appl. Phys. Le[. 99, 102109 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Lagarde, L

    D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, X. Marie, C. R. Zhu, B. L. Liu, T. Amand, P. H. Tan, and B. Urbaszek, Carrier and Polariza8on Dynamics in Monolayer MoS 2, Phys. Rev. Le[. 112, 047401 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    free” (red) and “localized

    G. Wang, E. Palleau, T. Amand, S. Tongay, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Polariza8on and 8me-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy of excitons in MoSe2 monolayers, Applied Physics Le[ers 106, 112101 (2015). 12 Fig 1: (a) Schema8cs of the sample structure highligh8ng the two exci...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.