Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Flexible Morphing Aerial Robot with Inflatable Structure for Perching-based Human-Robot Interaction

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims the first aerial robot that can perch on a human arm to interact: arms rigid in flight, inflatable-soft when grasping, with a free-fall perch and powered takeoff demonstrated end to end.

desk verdict A plausible first demonstration of a quadrotor perching on a human arm, with a clever hybrid mechanism; the theoretical 'conditions' are weaker than they look, and the human-perching claim needs scoping, but the core feasibility result stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07496 v1 pith:KCYQHTL4 submitted 2025-09-09 cs.RO

Ayano Miyamichi , Moju Zhao , Kazuki Sugihara , Junichiro Sugihara , Masanori Konishi , Kunio Kojima , Kei Okada , Masayuki Inaba This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords softaerialrobotperchinghuman-robotinteractioninflatableactuatormorphingquadrotorpneumaticcontrolcompliantgraspingunilateralflexiblearm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a 1.444 kg quadrotor with four hinge-segmented, rotor-embedded arms and pneumatic airbags can fly to a person, cut its propellers, free-fall onto an outstretched arm, inflate soft grips that hold with up to about 45 N, cling on through shaking and rolling, and then take off again—without injuring the human. The load-bearing idea is structural bistability: the arms hang limp when idle, but under sufficient propeller thrust they lock into a rigid chain, so standard quadrotor modeling and control remain valid despite the deformable body. A second contribution is pneumatic: the bottom airbag doubles as an air reservoir and shock absorber, speeding joint inflation during the fall, while the sealed actuators hold grasping pressure with the pump off, making the perch nearly energy-free. If the claims hold, perching-based human-robot interaction—close-range biometric checks, haptic guidance, rescue triage—becomes plausible for small aerial robots in human spaces.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the unilateral flexible arm with inflatable joint actuators: a chain of hollow hinge segments that lock into a rigid beam when propeller thrust pulls them taut and hang limp when it drops. Joint airbags (folded TPU pockets in the hinge gaps) generate torque M(θ,P0) ≈ ½(k0−k1θ)P0 l_link(y1²−y0²) − ⅓ k2 θ l_link(y1³−y0³), bending the arm around the grasped limb. The bottom inflatable actuator is triple-duty—air reservoir (cutting joint-inflation time ~1 s), landing shock absorber, and root bending torque via axial contraction. A Boyle's-law model sets reservoir pre-pressure P0 ≈ 38.2 kPa to yield stabilized joint pressure P1 ≈ 21 kPa, and the arm-base equilibrium λ_hov

What would settle it

A concrete test: repeat the perching sequence with a force-measuring sleeve on the forearm across several subjects, with the arm held still as in the paper, and then with the arm displaced a few centimeters during the free fall. If impact forces exceed a safe threshold, or success collapses with small displacements, the human-perching claim holds only for scripted poses. A second test: in tethered flight, reduce thrust below the paper's threshold λ_hover ≥ m_arm g/2 + m_rotor g and check whether the arms curl and the robot descends—confirming the rigidity threshold is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a 1.444 kg quadrotor with four rotor-embedded, hinge-segmented arms and joint airbags can perch on a human arm. Provided hover thrust satisfies λ_hover ≥ m_arm g/2 + m_rotor g, the unidirectional arms brace into a rigid chain, so standard quadrotor dynamics and an LQI attitude controller stay valid without modeling the flexible arms. For perching, the bottom airbag is pre-pressurized to about 40 kPa and dumped through a valve into the joint airbags, deforming the arms in about 0.3 s during free fall; the grip then holds a human arm at roughly 47 kPa average joint pressure with the pump off, surviving 6.6 m/s² shaking and about ±1 rad roll. The

Load-bearing premise

The human perching demonstration assumes a cooperative person: the robot does not recognize the arm and free-falls onto a limb the person must hold still and deliberately extend into its path; if the arm moves or is misaligned, the perch fails or could strike the person.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Perching-based human-robot interaction becomes practical: the robot can approach a person, cling to an outstretched arm, and keep holding through shaking and rolling with the pump and valves off, so close-range sensing or guidance costs almost no energy.
  • Morphing arms do not force complex flight control: above the derived thrust threshold the arms behave as rigid beams, so standard quadrotor dynamics with the onboard LQI controller suffice, and the robot recovers automatically after disturbance-induced arm deformation.
  • The reservoir function is what makes the free-fall perch work: pre-pressurized bottom airbags cut arm-deformation time by about 1 s versus pump-only inflation, letting the arms wrap the limb within the roughly 0.3 s fall.
  • Compactness while perched matters for human partners: folded to 110×110 mm above the arm, the robot leaves the elbow free to bend, unlike larger gripper-equipped drones that restrict natural arm movement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cooperative-pose premise caps the claimed capability: the robot never visually recognizes the arm and free-falls onto a limb the person must hold still and deliberately extend; perching on moving or unaware people remains untested, as the paper's own future-work section concedes.
  • Safety is asserted but not yet a measurement: the paper reports no injury and credits guards and soft parts, yet records no impact force on the human; an instrumented-arm trial that bounds contact force would convert the safety claim into a specification.
  • The bistability argument likely generalizes: if the thrust threshold λ_hover ≥ m_arm g/2 + m_rotor g is the real rigidity condition, other hinge-based morphing quadrotors could adopt standard quadrotor control without per-arm nonlinear models, a testable hypothesis beyond this platform.
  • Fatigue, not capability, may bound deployment: at the 50 kPa operating pressure the airbags survive roughly 289 inflation cycles in fatigue tests versus about 2144 at 40 kPa, suggesting field use trades grasping force for bag lifetime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 1.444 kg quadrotor with four unilateral flexible arms, each embedding a rotor, and a pneumatic system of joint and bottom inflatable actuators. The arms are designed to lock rigid during flight under sufficient thrust and to deform compliantly for perching. The authors derive a pressure/volume model to choose the initial bottom-actuator pressure, propose that standard quadrotor modeling and control are valid near hover when thrust keeps the arms rigid, and demonstrate grasping forces up to about 45 N, robustness to a disturbance-induced arm deformation, and an in-flight perching sequence on a human arm. The central claim is that this is the first aerial robot capable of perching on humans for interaction.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper offers a useful hardware contribution: an integrated morphing design that combines rigid flight behavior with soft, controllable grasping, and a pneumatic system that doubles as both an air reservoir and a shock absorber. The detailed fabrication descriptions, thrust measurements, pressure/volume model, and energy comparison tables are valuable for replication. The demonstrated perching on a human arm, even under cooperative conditions, is a notable feasibility data point for human-drone physical interaction. However, the evidence for the strongest claims is limited: the human perching rests on a single cooperative trial, the optimal-pressure derivation is partly circular, and the flight-robustness argument is supported by one disturbance experiment. These issues affect the paper's central novelty claim and need to be addressed before the contribution can be assessed at its face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.4.2, Appendix E] The human-perching demonstration is a single sequence performed under the explicit assumption in Appendix E that 'the human user must proactively align their arm with the robot, as the robot does not actively recognize the arm.' No impact force, contact pressure, or misalignment tolerance is reported. The abstract's claim of 'the first to achieve an aerial robot capable of perching on humans' is therefore stronger than the evidence supports. Please add repeated trials with varied arm positions/poses and report impact loads, or qualify the claim to 'perching on a stationary, cooperative, pre-aligned human arm.' This is load-bearing because human perching is the paper's core novelty.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (18)-(19); Sec. 5.2.2] The derivation of P0≈38.20 kPa is circular: the target P1=21 kPa is itself chosen from the approximation line of the measured grasping force described in Sec. 5.2.2. Equation (19) is therefore an empirical calibration, not an independent prediction. The paper should state this explicitly and provide uncertainty on the fitted line. Moreover, the executed human-perching experiment uses P0=40 kPa and obtains P1≈19-22 kPa, not the nominal 38.2/21 kPa from Eq. (19); the relationship between the derived 'optimal' pressure and the experimental condition needs clarification.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (21)-(25)] The claimed sufficient condition for arm rigidity reduces to m_body + 2m_arm ≥ 0, which is always true for positive masses. This provides no practical design constraint and does not, by itself, establish that standard quadrotor control remains effective during transient thrust reductions (e.g., during yaw maneuvers, as depicted in Fig. 4D). The disturbance-rejection experiment in Sec. 5.3 is a single push test with no repeated trials and no quantitative measurement of arm deformation during the transient. Please present repeated trials and, if possible, arm-angle/deformation data to support the 'robust flight' claim.
  4. [Sec. 5.2, Fig. 6] Grasping-force results are reported without error bars, standard deviations, or trial counts. The maximum forces (45.17 N for the H50 box, 41.65 N for the arm model) and the location of the optimum bottom pressure (≈20-21 kPa) are central to the pneumatic design and to the P0 derivation. Single measurements are insufficient. Please report means and spreads for at least the arm-model and H50-box conditions, including the number of repetitions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] Typo: 'thought of the solenoid valve' should be 'through the solenoid valve.' Also, 'PTE tubes' in Sec. 2.2/Fig. 3 should be 'PTFE tubes.'
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] 'thrust forces cause the arm to beam upward' should likely be 'bend upward'; the current phrasing is confusing.
  3. [Sec. 5.4.2 / Table 6] The text states that the joint actuator reaches 19 kPa as 'the maximum pressure needed to maintain the arm rigidity,' while Sec. 3.1 states the joint actuator should be 40-50 kPa during perching. Clarify the distinction between the pre-perch rigidity pressure and the final grasping pressure.
  4. [Eq. (20)] Define K_p and PWM_min and state their units/values. Also clarify whether the same controller is used for both actuator types.
  5. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2)] The approximation x ≈ yθ is introduced as a small-angle assumption but is applied up to θ = π/3 in Appendix A. Please state the intended validity range or justify the approximation at larger angles.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pressure-optimization chain is calibration, not prediction; the human-perching caveat is a limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The nearest-to-circular step is the choice of P1 = 21 kPa from measured grasping-force data (Sec. 3.1, citing Sec. 5.2.2) and then solving Eq. (18) for P0 ≈ 38.20 kPa. This is not circular: Eq. (18) is an independent mass-conservation/Boyle's-law relation, and P1 is an empirically chosen target, not the output being predicted. The optimality of P1 is imported from measurements, but the paper does not claim to derive maximum grasping force from the pneumatic model; it uses the model to back-calculate the initial bottom pressure needed to reach that target. The torque coefficients (Appendix A) and volume parameters (Appendix C) are fitted or measured calibrations used to make the model track data, not predictions derived from the conclusions. The flight-stability condition (Sec. 4.1) is derived from static moment equilibrium and holds trivially at hover; it does not assume the conclusion that standard quadrotor control is valid. The standard quadrotor modeling is independently tested by flight-disturbance experiments (Sec. 5.3), and the cited LQI controller from prior work by the same authors is a standard control tool, not a self-citation used to forbid alternatives. The human-perching experiment depends on the cooperative, pre-aligned arm assumption stated in Appendix E ('the human user must proactively align their arm with the robot, as the robot does not actively recognize the arm'), and future work acknowledges that arm recognition is still to be integrated. That is an honest limitation that weakens the strength of the 'first to perch on humans' claim, but it is a correctness/generality concern, not a circular derivation. No load-bearing step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theoretical outputs (optimal pressure, torque model) rest on several fitted or empirical parameters: k0-k2 fitted at a single pressure, Pmax from observation, residual volumes from water displacement, and the target P1 from a measured grasping-force trend. The thrust condition and quadrotor model rely on domain assumptions about arm rigidity. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (8)
  • k0 = 0.2206
    Torque model coefficient in Eq (7), curve-fitted to measured torque at 40 kPa (Appendix A).
  • k1 = 0.1745
    Torque model coefficient, fitted at 40 kPa (Appendix A).
  • k2 = -1.457
    Torque model coefficient, fitted at 40 kPa (Appendix A).
  • Pmax = 80 kPa
    Empirically observed pressure at which inflatable actuators transition to plastic deformation; used in volume model (13)-(18). Sec 3.1, Appendix C.
  • Vj,res = 1587 mm^3
    Residual volume of joint airbags measured by water displacement; used in (18) to solve for P0.
  • Vb,res = 0 mm^3
    Residual volume of bottom airbags measured by water displacement; used in (18).
  • P1 target = 21 kPa
    Target stabilized pressure after opening the valve, read from the approximation line of measured grasping force vs bottom pressure (Sec 3.1, 5.2.2); used to derive P0 in (19).
  • Airbag geometric parameters = x_j=30 mm, y_j=20 mm, x_b and y_b per design, n_j=20, n_b=4
    Airbag dimensions and counts from the design, substituted into the volume model Eq (18). These are design constants rather than fitted to data, but the derivation depends on them.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The unilateral flexible arm can be treated as a rigid beam near hover; base bending moment M_A >= 0 and thrust satisfies Eq (24)
    Used in Sec 4.1 to conclude arms stay straight during hover. Not proven for dynamic maneuvers such as yaw steps.
  • ad hoc to paper Joint airbag internal pressure distribution is linear: P(y) = k0 P0 - k1 P0 theta - k2 x (Eq 1)
    Assumes static fluid, linear elastic material, and pressure distribution depending on joint angle; acknowledged deviations at high pressures and angles (Appendix A).
  • ad hoc to paper Airbag volume follows elliptical-cylinder deformation with linear pressure dependence of parameter d (Eqs 10-13)
    Heuristic geometric model used for the pneumatic derivation; validated against only a few measured volumes (Appendix C).
  • standard math Isothermal conditions and mass conservation (Boyle's law) for air transfer between bottom and joint actuators (Eq 8)
    Physics background for pressure equalization; acceptable.
  • domain assumption In near-hover flight, Euler angle derivatives equal body angular velocities and allocation matrix Q is constant (Appendix H, I)
    Standard small-angle quadrotor modeling; the paper argues arm bistability justifies constant allocation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flexible Morphing Aerial Robot with Inflatable Structure for Perching-based Human-Robot Interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KCYQHTL4

@misc{pith2026250907496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flexible Morphing Aerial Robot with Inflatable Structure for Perching-based Human-Robot Interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KCYQHTL4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07496}
}
read the original abstract

Birds in nature perform perching not only for rest but also for interaction with human such as the relationship with falconers. Recently, researchers achieve perching-capable aerial robots as a way to save energy, and deformable structure demonstrate significant advantages in efficiency of perching and compactness of configuration. However, ensuring flight stability remains challenging for deformable aerial robots due to the difficulty of controlling flexible arms. Furthermore, perching for human interaction requires high compliance along with safety. Thus, this study aims to develop a deformable aerial robot capable of perching on humans with high flexibility and grasping ability. To overcome the challenges of stability of both flight and perching, we propose a hybrid morphing structure that combines a unilateral flexible arm and a pneumatic inflatable actuators. This design allows the robot's arms to remain rigid during flight and soft while perching for more effective grasping. We also develop a pneumatic control system that optimizes pressure regulation while integrating shock absorption and adjustable grasping forces, enhancing interaction capabilities and energy efficiency. Besides, we focus on the structural characteristics of the unilateral flexible arm and identify sufficient conditions under which standard quadrotor modeling and control remain effective in terms of flight stability. Finally, the developed prototype demonstrates the feasibility of compliant perching maneuvers on humans, as well as the robust recovery even after arm deformation caused by thrust reductions during flight. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to achieve an aerial robot capable of perching on humans for interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07496 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proposed morphing aerial robot composed of unilateral flexible arms and a pneumatic inflatable mechanism, which can perch on human arm dynamically in in-flight situation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proposed aerial robot that can perch on human body. (A) design of the unilateral flexible arm. (B) design of the unilateral flexible arm. While flying, thrust forces cause the arm to beam upward, and when the robot is stationary, the arm deform downward. The arm has hinges as joints and the small spaces for inserting inflatable actuators and tubes. (C) function of the inflatable mechanism for joints. It can move the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fabrication process of the inflatable actuators for joints. (A-1) inflatable actuator for joint fabrication. Both sides of the TPU are folded into four panel accordion fold and heat-sealed together. (A-2) left figure shows the joint movement using the airbag without four panel accodion fold, and the right figure shows that using the airbag with the fold. (B-1) inflatable actuator for the bottom of the arms fabricati… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (A) The model of adding torque to a hinge by inflated a joint airbag in the unilateral flexible arm (B) the model of volume of a inflated airbag (C) Rigid model of the unilateral flexible arm (D) desired recovery behavior when the robot’s arm deforms during flight [PI…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hardware diagram of the prototype of deformable aerial robot. (A) diagram of the hardware system. (B) overall flight system diagram of the control system. (C) hardware configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (A) Plot of grasping force results from all experiments. (B-1) Experimental setup for grasping force measurement. (B-2) Time-series plot of grasping force during the experiment. The maximum grasping force is determined as the force just before reaching the peak, right …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experiments in clinging to various objects and people (A) clinging to the various objects that tilts in steps after grasping them. (B) clinging to the arm of a person who is swinging, supinating and pronating. (C) plots of position and acceleration data while grasping …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flight stability evaluation. (A) snapshots of the experiment of attitude recovery when the arms flex in flight. (B) plots of the experiment. Above: errors of Position in the x, y and z axes. Below: errors of roll, pitch and yaw angles. The blue region in the figure is …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Experiment of perching on cylinder beam. (A) snapshots of the experiment. (B) plot of the target position and the measured values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Experiment of perching on a human arm from in-flight situation. (A) Snapshots of the experiment of perching on a human arm. The small sub-image below the left of each image is the human recognition result using an onboard RGB camera image. (B) plots of the target and …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (A) The experimental setup. (B) A plot compares the measured and theoretical values. The upper plot represents the relationship between pressure and torque, and the lower plot depicts the relationship between joint angle and torque [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (A) Theoretical and measured volumes of the joint and bottom inflatable actuators (B) Theoretical and measured values of the initial bottom pressure P0 and the stabilized pressure P1. The plot on the left shows the pressures of the joint and bottom inflatable actuator…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Task-based control strategy of the aerial robot that can perch on humans. (A) System architecture (B) Finite state machine of this perching system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Experiment of perching on a human arm from in-flight situation when the pre-applied pressure of bottom inflatable actuator 30 kPa. (A) Snapshots of the experiment of perching on a human arm. The small sub-image below the left of each image is the human recognition res…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bonatti, Y

    R. Bonatti, Y. Zhang, S. Choudhury, W. Wang, and S. Scherer, ``Autonomous drone cinematographer: Using artistic principles to create smooth, safe, occlusion-free trajectories for aerial filming,'' in Proceedings of the 2018 international symposium on experimental robotics , pp. 119--129, Springer, 2020

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Chataigner, ``Arsi: an aerial robot for sewer inspection.,'' Advances in Robotics Research: From Lab to Market

    F. Chataigner, ``Arsi: an aerial robot for sewer inspection.,'' Advances in Robotics Research: From Lab to Market. Springer, Cham, 2020 , pp. 249--274, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Michael, S

    N. Michael, S. Shen, K. Mohta, Y. Mulgaonkar, V. Kumar, K. Nagatani, Y. Okada, S. Kiribayashi, K. Otake, K. Yoshida, K. Ohno, E. Takeuchi, and S. Tadokoro, ``Collaborative mapping of an earthquake-damaged building via ground and aerial robots,'' Journal of Field Robotics , vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 832--841, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Floreano and R

    D. Floreano and R. J. Wood, ``Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones,'' Nature , vol. 521, pp. 460--466, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Kumar and N

    V. Kumar and N. Michael, ``Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles,'' The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1279--1291, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    K. Hang, X. Lyu, H. Song, J. A. Stork, A. M. Dollar, D. Kragic, and F. Zhang, ``Perching and resting—a paradigm for uav maneuvering with modularized landing gears,'' Science Robotics , vol. 4, no. 28, p. eaau6637, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    T. W. Danko, A. Kellas, and P. Y. Oh, ``Robotic rotorcraft and perch-and-stare: Sensing landing zones and handling obscurants,'' in ICAR'05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005. , pp. 296--302, IEEE, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Allenspach, Y

    M. Allenspach, Y. Vyas, M. Rubio, R. Siegwart, and M. Tognon, ``Human-state-aware controller for a tethered aerial robot guiding a human by physical interaction,'' IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2827--2834, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Liao, J. Salazar, and Y. Hirata, ``Robotic guidance system for visually impaired users running outdoors using haptic feedback,'' in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pp. 8325--8331, IEEE, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    T. Jain, A. Sibley, H. Stryhn, and I. Hubloue, ``Comparison of unmanned aerial vehicle technology-assisted triage versus standard practice in triaging casualties by paramedic students in a mass-casualty incident scenario,'' Prehospital and disaster medicine , vol. 33, no. 4, p...

    2018

  3. [11]

    Sanz-Martos, M

    S. Sanz-Martos, M. D. Lopez-Franco, C. \'A lvarez-Garc \' a, N. Granero-Moya, J. M. Lopez-Hens, S. C \'a mara-Anguita, P. L. Pancorbo-Hidalgo, and I. M. Comino-Sanz, ``Drone applications for emergency and urgent care: a systematic review,'' Prehospital and disaster medicine , ...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Anderson, ``A bird in the house: An anthropological perspective on companion parrots,'' Society & Animals , vol

    P. Anderson, ``A bird in the house: An anthropological perspective on companion parrots,'' Society & Animals , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 393--418, 2003

    2003

  5. [13]

    P. K. Anderson, ``Social dimensions of the human--avian bond: parrots and their persons,'' Anthrozo \"o s , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 371--387, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Tezza and M

    D. Tezza and M. Andujar, ``The state-of-the-art of human--drone interaction: A survey,'' IEEE access , vol. 7, pp. 167438--167454, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    McLaren, Z

    A. McLaren, Z. Fitzgerald, G. Gao, and M. Liarokapis, ``A passive closing, tendon driven, adaptive robot hand for ultra-fast, aerial grasping and perching,'' in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pp. 5602--5607, IEEE, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    P. E. I. Pounds, D. R. Bersak, and A. M. Dollar, ``Grasping from the air: Hovering capture and load stability,'' in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pp. 2491--2498, 2011

    2011

  9. [17]

    S. Lin, A. Lynch, and M. Liarokapis, ``An ultra-light, ultra-fast, passive closing aerial gripping system capable of grasping, perching, and aerial manipulation,'' in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Safety Security Rescue Robotics (SSRR) , pp. 12--17, IEEE, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Sun, and J. Zhao, ``Compliant bistable gripper for aerial perching and grasping,'' in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 1248--1253, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Y. Zhao, R. Xiang, H. Li, C. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Liu, and Y. Hao, ``Design and validation of a biomimetic leg-claw mechanism capable of perching and grasping for multirotor drones,'' Biomimetics , vol. 10, no. 1, p. 10, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    W. R. Roderick, M. R. Cutkosky, and D. Lentink, ``Bird-inspired dynamic grasping and perching in arboreal environments,'' Science Robotics , vol. 6, no. 61, p. eabj7562, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Ubellacker, A

    S. Ubellacker, A. Ray, J. M. Bern, J. Strader, and L. Carlone, ``High-speed aerial grasping using a soft drone with onboard perception,'' npj Robotics , vol. 2, no. 1, p. 5, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    C. E. Doyle, J. J. Bird, T. A. Isom, J. C. Kallman, D. F. Bareiss, D. J. Dunlop, R. J. King, J. J. Abbott, and M. A. Minor, ``An avian-inspired passive mechanism for quadrotor perching,'' IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 506--517, 2012

    2012

  15. [23]

    P. H. Nguyen, K. Patnaik, S. Mishra, P. Polygerinos, and W. Zhang, ``A soft-bodied aerial robot for collision resilience and contact-reactive perching,'' Soft Robotics , 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Sarkar, A

    D. Sarkar, A. Arora, S. Sen, S. S. S. Katta, D. Shashank, M. Rohan, and S. K. Saha, ``Development of an autonomous uav integrated with a manipulator and a soft gripper,'' in 2022 13th Asian Control Conference (ASCC) , pp. 2212--2217, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    J. T. Ping, B. H. Khoo, O. A. Syadiqeen, N. Khoo, C. P. Tan, and S. G. Nurzaman, ``Aerial grasping by a quadrotor uav with a soft material gripper,''

  18. [26]

    H. C. Cheung, C.-W. Chang, B. Jiang, C.-Y. Wen, and H. K. Chu, ``A modular pneumatic soft gripper design for aerial grasping and landing,'' in 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) , pp. 82--88, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Bucki, J

    N. Bucki, J. Tang, and M. W. Mueller, ``Design and control of a midair-reconfigurable quadcopter using unactuated hinges,'' IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 539--557, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    W. Tao, K. Patnaik, F. Chen, Y. Kumar, and W. Zhang, ``Design, characterization and control of a whole-body grasping and perching (whopper) drone,'' in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pp. 1--7, IEEE, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    F. Ruiz, B. C. Arrue, and A. Ollero, ``Sophie: Soft and flexible aerial vehicle for physical interaction with the environment,'' IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11086--11093, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Zheng, F

    P. Zheng, F. Xiao, P. H. Nguyen, A. Farinha, and M. Kovac, ``Metamorphic aerial robot capable of mid-air shape morphing for rapid perching,'' Scientific Reports , vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1297, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Sakaguchi, T

    A. Sakaguchi, T. Takimoto, and T. Ushio, ``A novel quadcopter with a tilting frame using parallel link mechanism,'' in 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) , pp. 674--683, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    figure-8

    Y. Bai and S. Gururajan, ``Evaluation of a baseline controller for autonomous “figure-8” flights of a morphing geometry quadcopter: Flight performance,'' Drones , 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Falanga, K

    D. Falanga, K. Kleber, S. Mintchev, D. Floreano, and D. Scaramuzza, ``The foldable drone: A morphing quadrotor that can squeeze and fly,'' IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 209--216, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    N. Zhao, Y. Luo, H. Deng, and Y. Shen, ``The deformable quad-rotor: Design, kinematics and dynamics characterization, and flight performance validation,'' in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pp. 2391--2396, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    D. Yang, S. Mishra, D. M. Aukes, and W. Zhang, ``Design, planning, and control of an origami-inspired foldable quadrotor,'' in 2019 American Control Conference (ACC) , pp. 2551--2556, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Bucki, J

    N. Bucki, J. Tang, and M. W. Mueller, ``Design and control of a midair-reconfigurable quadcopter using unactuated hinges,'' IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 539--557, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    M. Zhao, K. Kawasaki, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, ``Transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks: modeling, control, and motion planning for aerial transformation,'' Advanced Robotics , vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 825--845, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    H. Yang, S. Park, J. Lee, J. Ahn, D. Son, and D. Lee, ``Lasdra: Large-size aerial skeleton system with distributed rotor actuation,'' in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 7017--7023, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    Cawthorne, ``Development of a multirotor drone airbag,'' Flexible Master, University of Southern Denmark , 2016

    D. Cawthorne, ``Development of a multirotor drone airbag,'' Flexible Master, University of Southern Denmark , 2016

    2016

  32. [40]

    K. I. Ansari, A. Shendge, K. Pakhrani, and R. Singh, ``Design and development of an auto-inflatable airbag as the failsafe system of unmanned aerial vehicle,'' Materials Today: Proceedings , vol. 77, pp. 983--990, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Ryll and R

    M. Ryll and R. K. Katzschmann, ``Smors: A soft multirotor uav for multimodal locomotion and robust interaction,'' in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 2010--2016, IEEE, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    X. Zhou, S. Zhou, D. Li, and A. Zhou, ``Direct folding method of cylindrical airbag and its application in landing buffer,'' Journal of Aerospace Engineering , vol. 35, no. 6, p. 04022083, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    J. T. Bruton, T. G. Nelson, T. K. Zimmerman, J. D. Fernelius, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell, ``Packing and deploying soft origami to and from cylindrical volumes with application to automotive airbags,'' Royal Society open science , vol. 3, no. 9, p. 160429, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Abtahi, D

    P. Abtahi, D. Y. Zhao, J. L. E, and J. A. Landay, ``Drone near me: Exploring touch-based human-drone interaction,'' Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1--8, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. McClamroch, ``Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor uav on se(3),'' in 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pp. 5420--5425, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    M. Zhao, T. Anzai, F. Shi, T. Maki, T. Nishio, K. Ito, N. Kuromiya, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, ``Versatile multilinked aerial robot with tilted propellers: Design, modeling, control, and state estimation for autonomous flight and manipulation,'' Journal of Field Robotics , vol. 3...

    2021

  39. [47]

    A. G. Howard, ``Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 , 2017

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. Tan, R. Pang, and Q. V. Le, ``Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 10781--10790, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    , `` AIST Anthropometric Database 1991-1992 .'' https://www.airc.aist.go.jp/dhrt/91-92/data/list.html, 2005

    Digital Human Research Team, Artificial Intelligence Research Center, AIST. , `` AIST Anthropometric Database 1991-1992 .'' https://www.airc.aist.go.jp/dhrt/91-92/data/list.html, 2005. Accessed: 2025-01-03

    1991

  42. [50]

    Accessed: 2025-01-03

    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) , `` Human Body Size Database: size-JPN 2004-2006 .'' https://warp.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/286890/www.meti.go.jp/press/20071001007/20071001007.html, 2007. Accessed: 2025-01-03

    2004

  43. [51]

    Accessed: 2025-01-03

    NC State University , `` Anthropometric Data .'' https://multisite.eos.ncsu.edu/www-ergocenter-ncsu-edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2016/06/Anthropometric-Detailed-Data-Tables.pdf, 2016. Accessed: 2025-01-03

    2016

  44. [52]

    P. C. Young and J. Willems, ``An approach to the linear multivariable servomechanism problem,'' International journal of control , vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 961--979, 1972

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.