pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.08396 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-10 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat· nucl-th

T times μ phase diagram from a fractal NJL model

E. Megias , A. Deppman , V. S. Tim\'oteo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-latnucl-th
keywords fractal NJL modelQCD phase diagrammu-dependent couplinglattice QCDSTAR datanon-extensive statisticsquark condensatedynamical mass
0
0 comments X

The pith

A μ-dependent coupling in the fractal NJL model produces a T-μ phase diagram compatible with lattice QCD and STAR data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a chemical-potential-dependent coupling into the fractal Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. This dependence is fixed by matching the model's pseudo-critical temperatures to lattice QCD results at low μ. The adjusted coupling is then used to compute the dynamical quark mass, the quark condensate, the thermal susceptibility, and the location of the phase boundary across the full T-μ plane. The same framework works for both extensive and non-extensive statistics and reproduces STAR heavy-ion data after only minor parameter adjustments.

Core claim

By fitting a μ-dependent coupling to lattice pseudo-critical temperatures at low μ and applying it to the fractal NJL model, the authors obtain a single parameter set that describes the T × μ phase diagram in good agreement with STAR data from heavy-ion collisions, for both extensive and non-extensive statistics.

What carries the argument

The μ-dependent coupling in the fractal NJL model, obtained by fitting lattice pseudo-critical temperatures at low μ, which accounts for gluon effects and allows direct computation of the dynamical mass, condensate, susceptibility, and phase boundary.

If this is right

  • The model computes the dynamical quark mass and quark condensate at finite T and μ.
  • It locates the phase transition via the thermal susceptibility in the T-μ plane.
  • A single adjusted parameter set reproduces STAR data for both extensive and non-extensive statistics.
  • The resulting phase diagram remains compatible with lattice QCD results at low μ.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Parameterizing gluon effects through a simple μ-dependent coupling may offer a practical way to extend other effective models into the high-density regime.
  • The close match to STAR data suggests that fractal features in the quark interaction could capture relevant non-perturbative QCD physics.
  • Predictions for the critical endpoint position could be compared against upcoming beam-energy scan results.
  • The fitting procedure itself could be repeated for related models such as the Polyakov-NJL to test consistency across frameworks.

Load-bearing premise

The μ-dependence of the coupling fixed by fitting lattice data at low chemical potential can be transferred unchanged to compute the phase boundary at higher μ.

What would settle it

A lattice calculation or future heavy-ion measurement of the pseudo-critical temperature at a chemical potential well above the fitted range that lies substantially off the model's predicted curve.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08396 by A. Deppman, E. Megias, V. S. Tim\'oteo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase diagram from the fractal NJL model with Tsallis and BG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: µB-dependent coupling strength obtained by fitting lattice QCD re￾sults for Tc, with the Boltzmann statistics. 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 3.404 3.405 3.406 3.407 3.408 3.409 3.410 ΜB @GeVD G T q @GeV - 2 D Tsallis Statistics GT qHΜBL Gaussian fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: µB-dependent coupling strength obtained by fitting lattice QCD re￾sults for Tc, with the Tsallis statistics. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dynamical mass m, quark condensate |⟨qq¯ ⟩| and thermal susceptibil￾ity χ, for some values of the baryonic chemical potential, as a function of the temperature, with Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics for the quarks. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dynamical mass m, quark condensate |⟨qq¯ ⟩| and thermal susceptibil￾ity χ, for some values of the baryonic chemical potential, as a function of the temperature, with Tsallis statistics for the quarks. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Our final result: the phase diagram from the FNJL model with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a $\mu$-dependent coupling for a fractal effective model (FNJL) to make the results for the phase diagram compatible with the experimental data and lattice QCD calculations. The $\mu$-dependence of the coupling, which accounts for gluon effects, is obtained by fitting the lattice QCD results for the pseudo-critical temperature with the fractal model. We then use the new effective coupling in order to compute the dynamical mass, the quark condensate, the thermal susceptibility and, finally, the $T\times\mu$ phase diagram. We consider both extensive and non-extensive statistics, and with a slight variation in the $\mu$-dependent coupling parameters we provide a single result for our model which is able to describe incredibly well the data from STAR, considering the simplicity of the effective model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a μ-dependent coupling in a fractal NJL (FNJL) model, obtained by fitting lattice QCD pseudo-critical temperatures at low μ, to compute the dynamical quark mass, condensate, thermal susceptibility, and the full T-μ phase diagram. Both extensive (Boltzmann-Gibbs) and non-extensive (Tsallis) statistics are considered. With a slight additional variation of the coupling parameters, the model is claimed to describe STAR freeze-out data well, offering a simple effective description compatible with lattice results.

Significance. If the extrapolation of the fitted μ-dependent coupling holds without further tuning, the construction supplies a compact effective model that interpolates lattice pseudo-critical temperatures to finite density and yields a phase boundary consistent with heavy-ion data. The fractal extension and non-extensive statistics constitute modest novelties, but the overall significance remains limited by the absence of independent validation for the coupling outside the fit window.

major comments (2)
  1. [Definition of μ-dependent coupling] § on definition of μ-dependent coupling: The functional form of G(μ) is fixed exclusively by fitting lattice pseudo-critical temperatures at small μ; the manuscript supplies neither a QCD-derived motivation for this functional dependence nor a cross-check against any other lattice observable (e.g., susceptibilities or condensates) at intermediate μ, rendering the subsequent phase-diagram computation at higher μ an extrapolation whose reliability is untested.
  2. [Abstract and STAR comparison] Abstract and results section on STAR comparison: The claim that 'with a slight variation in the μ-dependent coupling parameters' the model describes STAR data 'incredibly well' introduces an extra fitting step after the lattice calibration; this additional freedom weakens the assertion that the model predicts rather than reproduces the observed freeze-out points and increases the circularity burden on the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] The legends and curve styles in the phase-diagram figures should explicitly label which lines correspond to the original lattice-fitted parameters versus the slightly varied set used for the STAR comparison.
  2. [Thermal susceptibility] Clarify whether the reported pseudo-critical temperatures are defined via the peak of the susceptibility or via a fixed value of the condensate; inconsistent definitions would affect the fitting procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on the model's construction and claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Definition of μ-dependent coupling] § on definition of μ-dependent coupling: The functional form of G(μ) is fixed exclusively by fitting lattice pseudo-critical temperatures at small μ; the manuscript supplies neither a QCD-derived motivation for this functional dependence nor a cross-check against any other lattice observable (e.g., susceptibilities or condensates) at intermediate μ, rendering the subsequent phase-diagram computation at higher μ an extrapolation whose reliability is untested.

    Authors: We agree that G(μ) is determined phenomenologically by fitting lattice pseudo-critical temperatures at low μ. As an effective model, the FNJL framework does not derive the functional form from first-principles QCD; instead, the μ-dependence is introduced to capture gluon screening effects not present in the standard NJL model. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript explaining this phenomenological motivation, the specific choice of functional form, and the limitations of extrapolating to higher μ. While the model computes the condensate and susceptibility, we have not performed direct comparisons to lattice results at intermediate μ, as the present scope focuses on the phase diagram; this is noted as a limitation for future work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and STAR comparison] Abstract and results section on STAR comparison: The claim that 'with a slight variation in the μ-dependent coupling parameters' the model describes STAR data 'incredibly well' introduces an extra fitting step after the lattice calibration; this additional freedom weakens the assertion that the model predicts rather than reproduces the observed freeze-out points and increases the circularity burden on the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the slight parameter variation for the STAR comparison constitutes an additional adjustment after the lattice calibration. This step was intended to illustrate the model's flexibility in describing experimental data. In the revised manuscript we have moderated the language in the abstract (removing 'incredibly well'), clarified that the primary calibration remains the lattice fit, and presented the STAR agreement as a consistency check within the uncertainties of the effective parameters rather than an independent prediction. The text now emphasizes that the phase diagram is obtained from the lattice-constrained coupling, with the data comparison serving to assess overall compatibility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

μ-dependent coupling fitted to lattice pseudo-critical temperatures then inserted into gap equation to obtain phase diagram and STAR agreement

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The μ-dependence of the coupling, which accounts for gluon effects, is obtained by fitting the lattice QCD results for the pseudo-critical temperature with the fractal model. We then use the new effective coupling in order to compute the dynamical mass, the quark condensate, the thermal susceptibility and, finally, the T×μ phase diagram. ... with a slight variation in the μ-dependent coupling parameters we provide a single result for our model which is able to describe incredibly well the data from STAR"

    G(μ) parameters are fixed by fitting lattice Tc(μ) at small μ; the same G(μ) is inserted into the gap equation to produce the critical line whose low-μ values must reproduce the fitted Tc by construction. The subsequent claim that this parametrization 'describes incredibly well' the STAR data therefore rests on an extrapolation whose functional form was already constrained by the lattice fit rather than derived from first-principles QCD.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins by fitting the functional form of the μ-dependent coupling to lattice QCD pseudo-critical temperatures at low μ. This fitted coupling is then substituted into the model's gap equation to generate the full T-μ critical line, dynamical masses, and condensates. The resulting phase boundary is presented as describing STAR freeze-out data well after minor parameter adjustment. Because the low-μ segment of the critical line is fixed by the same fit used for lattice Tc, agreement there is tautological; the finite-μ extrapolation inherits the parametrization without an independent QCD derivation or cross-validation against other lattice observables. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern with partial circularity on the central claim, but the model retains some independent structure outside the fit window, preventing a higher score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model relies on the fractal NJL framework as a valid effective description and introduces fitted parameters for the coupling without independent first-principles justification.

free parameters (1)
  • μ-dependent coupling parameters
    Parameters that set the chemical-potential dependence of the four-fermion coupling are determined by fitting lattice QCD pseudo-critical temperatures.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The fractal NJL model captures the essential non-perturbative dynamics of QCD at finite temperature and density.
    Invoked as the starting point for all calculations in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1376 out tokens · 51603 ms · 2026-05-18T18:11:25.958746+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The first second of the Universe,

    D. Schwarz, “The first second of the Universe,”Annalen der Physik, vol. 515, p. 220–270, May 2003

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars,

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, “The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars,”Physics Reports, vol. 621, p. 127–164, Mar. 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics,

    C. Tsallis, “Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics,”J. Statist. Phys., vol. 52, pp. 479–487, 1988

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Tsallis-thermometer: a qgp indicator for large and small collisional systems,

    G. Bíró, G. G. Barnaföldi, and T. S. Biró, “Tsallis-thermometer: a qgp indicator for large and small collisional systems,”Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 47, p. 105002, Aug. 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Interpretation of the nonextensivity paramete q in some applications of tsallis statistics and lévy distributions,

    G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, “Interpretation of the nonextensivity paramete q in some applications of tsallis statistics and lévy distributions,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, p. 2770–2773, Mar. 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Superstatistics,

    C. Beck and E. G. D. Cohen, “Superstatistics,”Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications, vol. 322, pp. 267–275, 2003

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Moments of rapidity distributions as a mea- sure of short-range fluctuations in high-energy collisions,

    A. Bialas and R. Peschanski, “Moments of rapidity distributions as a mea- sure of short-range fluctuations in high-energy collisions,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 273, p. 703–718, Sept. 1986

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in proton–proton collisions at 900 gev with alice at the lhc,

    K. Aamodt and et al., “Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in proton–proton collisions at 900 gev with alice at the lhc,”Physics Letters B, vol. 693, p. 53–68, Sept. 2010

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,

    J. D. Bjorken, “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,”Physical Review, vol. 179, p. 1547–1553, Mar. 1969

    work page 1969

  10. [10]

    The renormalization group and theϵexpan- sion,

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, “The renormalization group and theϵexpan- sion,”Physics Reports, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 75–199, 1974

    work page 1974

  11. [11]

    Self-consistency in non-extensive thermodynamics of highly excited hadronic states,

    A. Deppman, “Self-consistency in non-extensive thermodynamics of highly excited hadronic states,”Physica A - Statistical Mechanics and Its Appli- cations, vol. 391, no. 24, pp. 6380–6385, 2012. 13

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Fractal Structures of Yang- Mills Fields and Non Extensive Statistics: Applications to High Energy Physics,

    A. Deppman, E. Megías, and D. P. Menezes, “Fractal Structures of Yang- Mills Fields and Non Extensive Statistics: Applications to High Energy Physics,”MDPI Physics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 455–480, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Relativistic thermodynamics: Transverse mo- mentum distributions in high-energy physics,

    J. Cleymans and D. Worku, “Relativistic thermodynamics: Transverse mo- mentum distributions in high-energy physics,”Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics, vol. 40, no. 9, p. 095006, 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Tsallis statistics in the MIT bag model,

    E. Megías, D. P. Menezes, and A. Deppman, “Tsallis statistics in the MIT bag model,”Nuclear Physics A, vol. 987, pp. 144–158, 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model with a fractal inspired coupling,

    E. Megías, M. J. Teixeira, V. S. Timóteo, and A. Deppman, “Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model with a fractal inspired coupling,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 860, p. 139192, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    A Nonlocal, covariant generalization of the NJL model,

    R. D. Bowler and M. C. Birse, “A Nonlocal, covariant generalization of the NJL model,”Nucl. Phys. A, vol. 582, pp. 655–664, 1995

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    Chiral quark models with nonlocal separable interactions at finite temperature and chemical potential,

    D. Gomez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, “Chiral quark models with nonlocal separable interactions at finite temperature and chemical potential,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 65, p. 074021, 2002

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Dynamics and ther- modynamics of a non-local PNJL model with running coupling,

    T. Hell, S. Roessner, M. Cristoforetti, and W. Weise, “Dynamics and ther- modynamics of a non-local PNJL model with running coupling,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 79, p. 014022, 2009

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Superstrong coupling NJL model in arbitrary spacetime dimensions,

    A. Ahmad, A. Martínez, and A. Raya, “Superstrong coupling NJL model in arbitrary spacetime dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, no. 5, p. 054027, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    The Nambu and Jona Lasinio model: Its implica- tions for hadrons and nuclei,

    U. Vogl and W. Weise, “The Nambu and Jona Lasinio model: Its implica- tions for hadrons and nuclei,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 27, pp. 195–272, 1991

    work page 1991

  21. [21]

    The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromody- namics,

    S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromody- namics,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 64, pp. 649–708, 1992

    work page 1992

  22. [22]

    Thermodynamic Consis- tency of theq-Deformed Fermi-Dirac Distribution in Nonextensive Ther- mostatics,

    J. M. Conroy, H. G. Miller, and A. R. Plastino, “Thermodynamic Consis- tency of theq-Deformed Fermi-Dirac Distribution in Nonextensive Ther- mostatics,”Phys. Lett. A, vol. 374, pp. 4581–4584, 2010

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Non extensive thermodynamics and neutron star properties,

    D. P. Menezes, A. Deppman, E. Megías, and L. B. Castro, “Non extensive thermodynamics and neutron star properties,”Eur. Phys. J. A, vol. 51, no. 12, p. 155, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Thermodynamics and critical behavior in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD,

    P. Costa, M. C. Ruivo, and C. A. de Sousa, “Thermodynamics and critical behavior in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 096001, 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Nonextensive effects in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD,

    J. Rozynek and G. Wilk, “Nonextensive effects in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD,”J. Phys. G, vol. 36, p. 125108, 2009. 14

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Thermo-magnetic effects in quark matter: Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model constrained by lattice QCD,

    R. L. S. Farias, V. S. Timóteo, S. S. Avancini, M. B. Pinto, and G. Krein, “Thermo-magnetic effects in quark matter: Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model constrained by lattice QCD,”Eur. Phys. J. A, vol. 53, no. 5, p. 101, 2017

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    π0 pole mass calculation in a strong magnetic field and lattice constraints,

    S. S. Avancini, R. L. S. Farias, M. Benghi Pinto, W. R. Tavares, and V. S. Timóteo, “π0 pole mass calculation in a strong magnetic field and lattice constraints,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 767, pp. 247–252, 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Nambu–Jona-Lasinio SU(3) model constrained by lattice QCD: thermomagnetic effects in the magnetization,

    W. R. Tavares, R. L. S. Farias, S. S. Avancini, V. S. Timóteo, M. B. Pinto, and G. Krein, “Nambu–Jona-Lasinio SU(3) model constrained by lattice QCD: thermomagnetic effects in the magnetization,”Eur. Phys. J. A, vol. 57, no. 9, p. 278, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Chi- ral vortical catalysis constrained by LQCD simulations,

    R. M. Nunes, R. L. S. Farias, W. R. Tavares, and V. S. Timóteo, “Chi- ral vortical catalysis constrained by LQCD simulations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 5, p. 056026, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop,

    K. Fukushima, “Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 591, pp. 277–284, 2004

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Polyakov loop in chiral quark models at finite temperature,

    E. Megías, E. Ruiz Arriola, and L. L. Salcedo, “Polyakov loop in chiral quark models at finite temperature,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 065005, 2006

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Phases of QCD: Lattice thermo- dynamics and a field theoretical model,

    C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, “Phases of QCD: Lattice thermo- dynamics and a field theoretical model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 014019, 2006

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    The Phase Structure of the Polyakov–Quark-Meson Model,

    B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Wambach, “The Phase Structure of the Polyakov–Quark-Meson Model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 76, p. 074023, 2007

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop,

    K. Fukushima, “Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 114028, 2008. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 039902 (2008)]

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    QCD Crossover at Finite Chem- ical Potential from Lattice Simulations,

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, “QCD Crossover at Finite Chem- ical Potential from Lattice Simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 5, p. 052001, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,”Nucl. Phys. A, vol. 772, pp. 167–199, 2006

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Hadron Formation in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions and the QCD Phase Diagram,

    F. Becattini, M. Bleicher, T. Kollegger, T. Schuster, J. Steinheimer, and R. Stock, “Hadron Formation in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions and the QCD Phase Diagram,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 111, p. 082302, 2013. 15

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Freeze-out conditions from net-proton and net-charge fluctuations at RHIC,

    P. Alba, W. Alberico, R. Bellwied, M. Bluhm, V. Mantovani Sarti, M. Nahrgang, and C. Ratti, “Freeze-out conditions from net-proton and net-charge fluctuations at RHIC,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 738, pp. 305–310, 2014

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Hadron multiplicities and chemical freeze-out conditions in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions,

    V. Vovchenko, V. V. Begun, and M. I. Gorenstein, “Hadron multiplicities and chemical freeze-out conditions in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions,”Phys. Rev. C, vol. 93, no. 6, p. 064906, 2016

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Rela- tivistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program,

    L. Adamczyket al., “Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Rela- tivistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program,”Phys. Rev. C, vol. 96, no. 4, p. 044904, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Non extensive thermodynam- ics for hadronic matter with finite chemical potentials,

    E. Megías, D. P. Menezes, and A. Deppman, “Non extensive thermodynam- ics for hadronic matter with finite chemical potentials,”Physica A, vol. 421, pp. 15–24, 2015

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model,

    A. Bazavovet al., “Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 86, p. 034509, 2012

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Deppman, E

    A. Deppman, E. Megías, and V. S. Timóteo, work in progress, 2025. 16

    work page 2025