Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

This paper reports the first experimental demonstration of intermittent chaos in an optomechanical microresonator, and shows that the mixed periodic-chaotic state improves ultrasonic detection.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

An optomechanical microresonator enters chaos through an alternating periodic-chaotic state, and that intermediate state improves ultrasonic sensing.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection Plausible first experimental observation of intermittent chaos in a WGM optomechanical resonator, but the 'chaotic' label rests on manual segmentation rather than any dynamical invariant. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.09258 v1 pith:4RF3LEOM submitted 2025-09-11 quant-ph nlin.CDphysics.optics

Intermittent chaos in an optomechanical resonator

Yue Huo , Zhe Wang , Zhenning Yang , Xiaohe Tang , Deng-Wei Zhang , Qianchuan Zhao , Wenjie Wan , Yu-xi Liu
show 4 more authors
Xin-You L\"u Guangming Zhao Liang Lu Jing Zhang
This is my paper
classification quant-ph nlin.CDphysics.optics PACS 05.45.-a42.50.Wk42.60.Da
keywords optomechanicsintermittent chaoswhispering-gallery-mode microresonatormicrotoroidroute to chaosultrasonic sensingnoise-enhanced sensingduty cycle decomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first experimental observation of intermittent chaos in a radiation-pressure-driven optomechanical resonator, specifically a whispering-gallery-mode microtoroid, a chip-scale silica disc that guides light around its rim. As the laser-cavity frequency detuning increases, the mechanical oscillation passes through a regime in which regular periodic motion and chaotic bursts alternate in time, and the fraction of time spent in chaos grows continuously until the motion becomes fully chaotic. The authors interpret this mixed state as a controlled noise source of favorable intensity: when the resonator detects an ultrasonic signal, the intermittent-chaos state yields a higher signal-to-noise ratio and lower noise-equivalent power than either the periodic or fully chaotic state, and outperforms a commercial ultrasonic probe. If correct, this provides a new continuously tunable route to chaos in optomechanics and a practical noise-enhancement mechanism for sensing.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a radiation-pressure-driven whispering-gallery-mode microtoroid exhibits a route to chaos through intermittency rather than period-doubling bifurcations. As the detuning between the input laser and the cavity mode increases, the mechanical oscillation leaves a stable periodic state, enters a regime in which periodic and chaotic motion alternate within the same time trace, and finally becomes fully chaotic; the proportion of chaotic time rises asymptotically and monotonically. The paper further claims that this intermittent-chaos state acts as noise of a favorable intensity for signal detection: an imposed ultrasonic signal near 570 kHz is read out with the h

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the optomechanical coupling itself: radiation pressure from the circulating optical field excites a 21.5 MHz mechanical mode, and the resulting mechanical deformation shifts the optical resonance, creating the nonlinear feedback that produces the state. To quantify the mixed state, the paper decomposes the measured signal as xI(t) = xP(t)s(t) + xC(t)(1−s(t)), where s(t) is a periodic square wave; the duty cycle D = T0/Ts measures the fraction of time spent in chaotic motion and tracks the transition. The spectral fingerprint of coexistence is a raised spectral base beneath the mechanical peaks with a hollow-like structure.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the irregular intervals in the time traces being genuine deterministic chaos rather than ordinary noise, thermal drift, or mode hopping; the paper does not compute a Lyapunov exponent or similar invariant to certify this.

What would settle it

Reanalyze the raw time traces restricted to the segments labeled chaotic using a standard chaos test, such as estimating the largest Lyapunov exponent or applying the 0–1 test for chaos; if these segments show no positive exponent or are indistinguishable from filtered noise, the intermittent-chaos claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Optomechanical systems now have a demonstrated continuous route to chaos distinct from period-doubling bifurcations.
  • The chaotic fraction can be tuned monotonically by frequency detuning, giving a single-parameter noise-intensity control.
  • Intermittent chaos can serve as beneficial noise for nonlinear sensing, improving SNR and NEP over both ordered and fully chaotic states.
  • The results connect intermittent chaos to stochastic-resonance-like noise effects in a new physical platform.
  • Optomechanical microresonators could act as sensitive ultrasonic detectors without requiring externally injected noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: If the chaotic segments are confirmed by invariant measures, the duty-cycle decomposition offers a model-free estimator of the chaotic fraction that could be transferred to other intermittency datasets.
  • Editorial extension: The detuning-controlled chaotic fraction suggests a route to analog random-number generation or reservoir computing where noise intensity is set by a single laser parameter rather than by external electronics.
  • Editorial extension: A testable follow-up is to measure the distribution of the laminar (periodic) phase lengths; type-I intermittency would show a characteristic scaling, distinguishing true deterministic intermittency from noise-driven switching.
  • Editorial extension: Sweeping detuning finely near the periodic-to-intermittent boundary could reveal an optimal noise intensity and show whether the sensing benefit persists at much weaker ultrasonic signals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on a whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microtoroidal optomechanical resonator and claims the first experimental observation of intermittent chaos. As the laser-cavity detuning is increased, the system is said to evolve from periodic oscillation through an intermittent-chaos regime, where periodic and chaotic motions alternate, to fully developed chaos. The authors quantify the chaotic proportion using a manually defined periodic square-wave duty cycle (Eqs. (1)-(2), Fig. 3(a)) and report a continuous, asymptotically saturating increase. They further show that in the intermittent-chaos state, ultrasonic sensing exhibits enhanced SNR and reduced NEP compared with the periodic and chaotic regimes and with a commercial probe (Fig. 4). The claimed significance is a new route to chaos in optomechanics and a noise-benefit sensing mechanism.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this would be the first experimental demonstration of intermittent chaos in an optomechanical system, a result of genuine interest given the extensive prior work on period-doubling chaos in this platform (Refs. [9-11]). The sensing application, in which intermittent chaos acts as beneficial noise, is also conceptually appealing and would extend the stochastic-resonance paradigm to deterministic intermittent dynamics. The manuscript provides clear qualitative evidence: time-domain traces, phase-space density plots, and spectra for the three regimes are illustrative and consistent with an alternating periodic/irregular behavior. However, the quantitative claims rest on a single manually constructed measure (the square-wave duty cycle) and lack any dynamical invariant or surrogate test to certify that the irregular segments are deterministic chaos rather than noise-induced switching. The paper also offers no comparison with the existing theoretical model for optomechanical intermittency (Ref. [22]). These omissions are load-bearing because both the route-to-chaos claim and the noise-benefit sensing explanation depend on the chaotic nature of the interm

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (1)-(2) and Fig. 3(a)] There is an internal inconsistency in the definition of the duty cycle. In Eq. (1), xI = xP·s + xC·(1-s), so s(t)=1 selects the periodic part. Eq. (2) sets s(t)=1 for |t|<T0/2, hence T0 is the duration of the periodic segment. Consequently D = T0/Ts is the periodic fraction, not the chaotic fraction. The text and Fig. 3(a), however, treat D as the proportion of time spent in chaotic motion and state that it increases with detuning. This undermines the quantitative claim in Fig. 3(a). The authors must reconcile the sign convention and clarify how the square wave was actually fitted; also provide uncertainties for D.
  2. [Figs. 2(c), 3(b)-(e); text near Eq. (1)] The classification of the irregular intervals as deterministic chaos is not established. The only quantitative tool is the manual square-wave segmentation of Eq. (1); no Lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension, recurrence analysis, or surrogate-data test is reported, and no comparison is made with the predicted intermittency statistics of Ref. [22]. The observed alternating bursts could equally arise from noise-induced switching (laser frequency noise, thermal drift, mode hopping). Without a dynamical invariant or at least a surrogate test, the central claim of 'first experimental demonstration of intermittent chaos' is unsupported. This also weakens the later sensing explanation in Fig. 4.
  3. [Fig. 4(e)-(f) and Eq. (3)] The SNR/NEP enhancement in the intermittent-chaos state is presented without error bars, number of repeated measurements, or statistical significance. The comparison with a 'commercial ultrasonic probe' lacks specification of the probe model, calibration, and measurement conditions. Moreover, the attribution of the enhancement to 'favorable noise' from intermittent chaos depends on the unverified chaotic classification. Please provide repeated-measurement statistics and, if possible, a control experiment with broadband stochastic noise to demonstrate that the effect is specific to deterministic intermittent dynamics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1] The text says panel (c) shows transmission 'above threshold' and panel (e) shows 'linewidth significantly narrowed' but the accompanying description is confusing; clarify which panels correspond to below/above threshold and define the thermal-effect feature.
  2. [Eq. (3)] Please specify that SNR in Eq. (3) is a linear power ratio (not dB), and define Pu and B explicitly in the text before the equation.
  3. [General] The sign convention for 'frequency detuning increases' is not defined; state whether the laser is swept to the blue or red side of the cavity resonance, as this is relevant to the mechanism.
  4. [Introduction / Ref. [22]] Since Ref. [22] provides a theoretical model for intermittent chaos in cavity optomechanics, a quantitative comparison (e.g., average laminar-phase duration versus detuning) would greatly strengthen the experimental identification. At present the comparison is only qualitative.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The route-to-chaos 'proportion' is defined as the duty cycle of the segmentation square wave, so Fig. 3(a)'s increasing chaotic fraction is partly built into the decomposition; the raw alternation and sensing benchmark remain independent.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 'Intermittent chaos', Eqs. (1)-(2), Fig. 3(a) and surrounding text]
    "To quantify the alternating appearance of periodic and chaotic motions over time in the intermittent-chaos regime, we employ a periodic square wave as a reference... D = T0/Ts in Eq. (2) is the duty cycle... The duty cycle D thus corresponds to the proportion of time spent in chaotic motion. As the frequency detuning increases, chaotic motion emerges, and its proportion initially grows rapidly from zero before gradually approaching saturation... The duty cycle D of the periodic square wave used to separate the intermittent-chaos signal follows the same increasing trend as that of the chaotic p"

    The quantitative observable at the center of the claimed route—'proportion of chaotic motion'—is not measured by an independent dynamical invariant. It is defined by Eq. (2) as the duty cycle D of the square wave s(t) used to slice the time trace into 'periodic' and 'chaotic' parts. Fig. 3(a) then plots this D as the experimental trend, and the text says D follows the same trend as the chaotic proportion, which compares the quantity with its own definition. If T0 is chosen from visually irregular bursts, the asymptotic increase in Fig. 3(a) is largely a property of the segmentation procedure rather than an independent deduction. The time-domain alternation and spectral broadening are real independent observations, but the specific quantitative claim of an increasing, saturating chaotic fra

full rationale

The paper does not derive intermittent chaos from the optomechanical equations; it reports experimental traces. The strongest independent content is the visible alternation between smooth and irregular intervals in Fig. 2(c)/3(b-e), the elevation and hollowing of the spectral base, and the external comparison of SNR/NEP against a commercial ultrasonic probe. These do not reduce to Eq. (2). The circularity is confined to the quantitative route-to-chaos statement: the fraction of time spent in chaos is set equal to D, the duty cycle of the segmentation square wave, so the curve in Fig. 3(a) is the curve of the mask parameter. This is the central quantitative claim supporting the 'first demonstration' and the asymptotic route, so the paper merits a mid-range score rather than 0-2. The invocation of Ref. [22] involves coauthors Zhang and Lü, but it is used as a theoretical precedent and is not the sole basis for the empirical observations; I do not treat it as an additional circular step. The absence of Lyapunov exponents or surrogate tests is a correctness/verification gap, not itself a circularity, but it is what prevents the D-based measure from being anchored to a genuinely independent definition of chaos.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard optomechanical feedback model, on the dynamical classification of observed intervals as chaotic, and on a square-wave decomposition used to quantify chaotic proportion. No free physical parameters are fitted, but the duty cycle used for segmentation is data-dependent. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Square-wave duty cycle D = varies with detuning; values not tabulated
    Defined in Eq. (2) and used to separate periodic and chaotic segments in Eq. (1). It is adjusted to the measured time trace, so it is a fitted data-analysis parameter rather than a fixed physical constant. The increasing trend of D is presented in Fig. 3(a) as the main quantitative evidence for the intermittency route.
axioms (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The time-domain intermittent signal can be decomposed as xP(t)s(t) + xC(t)(1-s(t)) with a periodic square wave s(t)
    Eq. (1)-(2). This decomposition assumes chaotic and periodic segments are cleanly separable by a square wave of fixed period, which is a modeling choice, not an experimentally established fact.
  • domain assumption The 'chaotic' intervals are deterministic chaos in the sense of positive Lyapunov exponents
    The paper labels intervals as chaotic from time traces and phase-space spreading, but computes no invariant measure. This is an implicit dynamical-systems assumption.
  • domain assumption Standard cavity-optomechanics radiation-pressure feedback underlies the observed dynamics
    Invoked throughout the introduction and Fig. 1; the paper relies on the standard optomechanical model from Refs. [47,51] without deriving it.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intermittent chaos in an optomechanical resonator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4RF3LEOM

@misc{pith2026250909258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intermittent chaos in an optomechanical resonator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4RF3LEOM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09258}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Chaos is a fundamental phenomenon in nonlinear dynamics, manifesting as irregular and unpredictable behavior across various physical systems. Among the diverse routes to chaos, intermittent chaos is a distinct transition pathway, characterized by the temporal or spatial alternation between periodic and chaotic motions. Here, we experimentally demonstrate, for the first time, optomechanically induced intermittent chaos in an optical whispering-gallery-mode microresonator. Specifically, the system evolves from stable periodic oscillation through an intermittent-chaos regime before fully developing into chaotic motion. As system parameters vary, the proportion of chaotic motion in the time-domain increases asymptotically until chaotic dynamics dominates entirely. Moreover, it is counterintuitive that, intermittent chaos can act as noise of a favorable intensity compared with purely periodic or fully chaotic states, and enhance rather than reduce system's responses in nonlinear ultrasonic detection. These findings not only deepen the comprehensive understanding of chaos formation but also broaden its potential applications in high-precision sensing and information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09258 by Deng-Wei Zhang, Guangming Zhao, Jing Zhang, Liang Lu, Qianchuan Zhao, Wenjie Wan, Xiaohe Tang, Xin-You L\"u, Yue Huo, Yu-xi Liu, Zhenning Yang, Zhe Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Optomechanics-induced intermittent chaos. (a) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mechanism of the route to chaos via intermittent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ultrasonic sensing by the intermittent chaos. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Jiang, L

    X. Jiang, L. Shao, S.-X. Zhang, X. Yi, J. Wiersig, L. Wang, Q. Gong, M. Lonˇ car, L. Yang, and Y.-F. Xiao, Chaos-assisted broadband momentum transformation in optical microresonators, Science 358, 344 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    The duty cycle D thus corresponds to the proportion of time spent in chaotic motion

    is the duty cycle, where Ts is the cycle period of the square wave and T0 is the duration of chaotic part within one cycle. The duty cycle D thus corresponds to the proportion of time spent in chaotic motion. As the duty cycle D increases, the system will gradually transit from a periodic state to a fully chaotic state via the intermittent-chaos regime. T...

  3. [3]

    Jiang, S

    X. Jiang, S. Yin, H. Li, J. Quan, H. Goh, M. Cotrufo, J. Kullig, J. Wiersig, and A. Al` u, Coherent control of chaotic optical microcavity with reflectionless scatterin g modes, Nat. Phys. 20, 109 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    V. A. Podolskiy, E. Narimanov, W. Fang, and H. Cao, Chaotic microlasers based on dynamical localization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10498 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Hayes, C

    S. Hayes, C. Grebogi, and E. Ott, Communicating with chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3031 (1993)

    1993

  6. [6]

    Xiao, X.-F

    Y.-F. Xiao, X.-F. Jiang, Q.-F. Yang, L. Wang, K. Shi, Y. Li, and Q. Gong, Tunneling- induced transparency in a chaotic microcavity, Laser Photonics Rev. 7, L51 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Uchida, K

    A. Uchida, K. Amano, M. Inoue, K. Hirano, S. Naito, H. Someya, I. Oowada, T. Kurashige, M. Shiki, S. Yoshi- mori, K. Yoshimura, and P. Davis, Fast physical ran- dom bit generation with chaotic semiconductor lasers, Nat. Photonics 2, 728 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    G. D. VanWiggeren and R. Roy, Communication with chaotic lasers, Science 279, 1198 (1998)

    1998

  9. [9]

    Carmon, M

    T. Carmon, M. C. Cross, and K. J. Vahala, Chaotic quivering of micron-scaled on-chip res- onators excited by centrifugal optical pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 167203 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    and experimentally demonstrated [ 9, 11] following the period-doubling bifurcation route to chaos in cavity optomechanics. Furthermore, optomechanical chaos in- arXiv:2509.09258v1 [quant-ph] 11 Sep 2025 2 duced by the parity-time (PT) symmetry breaking was investigated in coupled cavities, which features a control- lable PT-symmetry phase transition [ 52]...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Guanyu Wang, Dajun Chen, Jianya Lin, and Xing Chen, The application of chaotic oscillators to weak signal de- tection, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 46, 440 (1999)

    1999

  12. [12]

    Bakemeier, A

    L. Bakemeier, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Route to chaos in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 013601 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    Monifi, J

    F. Monifi, J. Zhang, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, B. Peng, Y.-x. Liu, F. Bo, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Optomechanically induced stochastic resonance and chaos transfer between optical fields, Nat. Photonics 10, 399 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Manneville and Y

    P. Manneville and Y. Pomeau, Intermittency and the Lorenz model, Phys. Lett. A 75, 1 (1979)

    1979

  15. [15]

    Pomeau and P

    Y. Pomeau and P. Manneville, Intermittent transi- tion to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 74, 189 (1980)

    1980

  16. [16]

    J. Qin, L. Wang, D. P. Yuan, P. Gao, and B. Z. Zhang, Chaos and bifurcations in periodic windows observed in plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 163 (1989)

    1989

  17. [17]

    Chen, S.-y

    F.-s. Chen, S.-y. Jiang, and J.-n. Fu, Intermittent chaos in pulsating stars, Chin. Astron. Astrophys. 18, 292 (1994)

    1994

  18. [18]

    A. D. Chernin and M. J. Valtonen, Intermittent chaos in three-body dynamics, New Astron. Rev. 42, 41 (1998)

    1998

  19. [19]

    A. E. Hramov, V. V. Makarov, V. A. Maximenko, A. A. Koronovskii, and A. G. Balanov, Intermittency route to chaos and broadband high-frequency generation in semiconductor superlattice coupled to external resonator , Phys. Rev. E 92, 022911 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Suzuki, M

    Y. Suzuki, M. Lu, E. Ben-Jacob, and J. N. Onuchic, Peri- odic, quasi-periodic and chaotic dynamics in simple gene elements with time delays, Sci. Rep. 6, 21037 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    I. N. Bubanja, S. Ma´ ceˇ si´ c, A. Ivanovi´ c-ˇSaˇ si´ c,ˇZ. ˇCupi´ c, S. Ani´ c, and Lj. Kolar-Ani´ c, Intermittent chaos in the Bray–Liebhafsky oscillator. Temperature dependence, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 9770 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Aizawa, Symbolic dynamics approach to intermittent chaos, Prog

    Y. Aizawa, Symbolic dynamics approach to intermittent chaos, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 1249 (1983)

    1983

  23. [23]

    S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, E. Kaiser, and J. N. Kutz, Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system, Nat. Commun. 8, 19 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Zhang, C

    D.-W. Zhang, C. You, and X.-Y. L¨ u, In- termittent chaos in cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053851 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Benzi, G

    R. Benzi, G. Paladin, S. Patarnello, P. Santan- gelo, and A. Vulpiani, Intermittency and co- herent structures in two-dimensional turbulence, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 19, 3771 (1986)

    1986

  26. [26]

    D. Y. Tang, M. Y. Li, and C. O. Weiss, Laser dynamics 6 of type-I intermittency, Phys. Rev. A 46, 676 (1992)

    1992

  27. [27]

    Shirahama, K

    H. Shirahama, K. Fukushima, N. Yoshida, and K. Taniguchi, Intermittent chaos in a mutually coupled PLL’s system, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fundam. Theory Appl. 45, 1114 (1998)

    1998

  28. [28]

    F. C. Hoppensteadt, Intermittent chaos, self- organization, and learning from synchronous synaptic activity in model neuron networks., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 2991 (1989)

    1989

  29. [29]

    Wojtusiak, A

    A. Wojtusiak, A. Balanov, and S. Savel’ev, Intermittent and metastable chaos in a memristive artificial neuron with inertia, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 142, 110383 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    A. K. D. Bosco, N. Sato, Y. Terashima, S. Ohara, A. Uchida, T. Harayama, and M. Inubushi, Random number generation from intermittent optical chaos, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 23, 1 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip, Nature 421, 925 (2003)

    2003

  32. [32]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    J. Zhu, S. K. Ozdemir, Y.-F. Xiao, L. Li, L. He, D.-R. Chen, and L. Yang, On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microres- onator, Nat. Photonics 4, 46 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    Goldwin, M

    J. Goldwin, M. Trupke, J. Kenner, A. Ratnapala, and E. Hinds, Fast cavity-enhanced atom detection with low noise and high fidelity, Nat. Commun. 2, 418 (2011)

    2011

  35. [35]

    J. Su, A. F. Goldberg, and B. M. Stoltz, Label- free detection of single nanoparticles and biologi- cal molecules using microtoroid optical resonators, Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16001 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    B.-B. Li, J. B ´ ılek, U. B. Hoff, L. S. Madsen, S. Forstner, V. Prakash, C. Sch¨ afermeier, T. Gehring, W. P. Bowen, and U. L. Andersen, Quantum enhanced optomechanical magnetometry, Optica 5, 850 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Forstner, S

    S. Forstner, S. Prams, J. Knittel, E. D. van Ooijen, J. D. Swaim, G. I. Harris, A. Szorkovszky, W. P. Bowen, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Cavity optomechanical magne- tometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 120801 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Basiri-Esfahani, A

    S. Basiri-Esfahani, A. Armin, S. Forstner, and W. P. Bowen, Precision ultrasound sensing on a chip, Nat. Commun. 10, 132 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    X. Xu, W. Chen, G. Zhao, Y. Li, C. Lu, and L. Yang, Wireless whispering-gallery-mode sen- sor for thermal sensing and aerial mapping, Light Sci. Appl. 7, 62 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    X. Xu, X. Jiang, G. Zhao, and L. Yang, Phone- sized whispering-gallery microresonator sensing system, Opt. Express 24, 25905 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Liao and L

    J. Liao and L. Yang, Optical whispering-gallery mode barcodes for high-precision and wide-range temperature measurements, Light Sci. Appl. 10, 32 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Rosenblum, Y

    S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, L. Arazi, F. Vollmer, and B. Dayan, Cavity ring-up spectroscopy for ultrafast sensing with optical microresonators, Nat. Commun. 6, 6788 (2015)

    2015

  43. [43]

    Lai, Y.-K

    Y.-H. Lai, Y.-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced Sagnac effect, Nature 576, 65 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    Lai, M.-G

    Y.-H. Lai, M.-G. Suh, Y.-K. Lu, B. Shen, Q.-F. Yang, H. Wang, J. Li, S. H. Lee, K. Y. Yang, and K. Vahala, Earth rotation measured by a chip-scale ring laser gyro- scope, Nat. Photonics 14, 345 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Qvarfort, A

    S. Qvarfort, A. Serafini, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose, Gravimetry through non-linear optomechanics, Nat. Commun. 9, 3690 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    Marin-Palomo, J

    P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V. Brasch, M. H. Anderson, R. Rosenberger, K. Vijayan, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communi- cations, Nature 546, 274 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    D. T. Spencer, T. Drake, T. C. Briles, J. Stone, L. C. Sin- clair, C. Fredrick, Q. Li, D. Westly, B. R. Ilic, A. Blue- stone, N. Volet, T. Komljenovic, L. Chang, S. H. Lee, D. Y. Oh, M.-G. Suh, K. Y. Yang, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kippenberg, E. Norberg, L. Theogarajan, K. Va- hala, N. R. Newbury, K. Srinivasan, J. E. Bowers, S. A. Diddams, and S. B. Papp,...

    2018

  48. [48]

    Feldmann, N

    J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, M. Karpov, H. Gehring, X. Li, M. Stappers, M. Le Gallo, X. Fu, A. Lukashchuk, A. S. Raja, J. Liu, C. D. Wright, A. Sebastian, T. J. Kippenberg, W. H. P. Pernice, and H. Bhaskaran, Paral- lel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core, Nature 589, 52 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  50. [50]

    I. S. Grudinin, H. Lee, O. Painter, and K. J. Va- hala, Phonon laser action in a tunable two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 083901 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krimer, G. Zhao, F. Nori, Y.-x. Liu, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point, Nat. Photonics 12, 479 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S. Kim, F. Monifi, X. Jiang, Y. Li, P. Yu, L. Liu, Y.-x. Liu, A. Al` u, and L. Yang, Optome- chanical dissipative solitons, Nature 600, 75 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Carmon, H

    T. Carmon, H. Rokhsari, L. Yang, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala, Temporal behavior of radiation-pressure- induced vibrations of an optical microcavity phonon mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 223902 (2005)

    2005

  54. [54]

    X.-Y. L¨ u, H. Jing, J.-Y. Ma, and Y. Wu, PT-symmetry-breaking chaos in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 253601 (2015)

    2015

  55. [55]

    R. L. Badzey and P. Mohanty, Coherent signal amplifica- tion in bistable nanomechanical oscillators by stochastic resonance, Nature 437, 995 (2005)

    2005

  56. [56]

    Liu and Y.-C

    Z. Liu and Y.-C. Lai, Coherence Resonance in Coupled Chaotic Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4737 (2001)

    2001

  57. [57]

    Li, Positive-Incentive Noise, IEEE Trans

    X. Li, Positive-Incentive Noise, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35, 8708 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Z. Shi, Q. Lv, M. Fu, X. Wang, Z. Huang, X. Wei, M. Am- abili, and R. Huan, Noise-enhanced stability in synchro- nized systems, Sci. Adv. 11, eadx1338 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Z. Li, C. Li, Z. Xiong, G. Xu, Y. R. Wang, X. Tian, X. Yang, Z. Liu, Q. Zeng, R. Lin, Y. Li, J. K. W. Lee, J. S. Ho, and C.-W. Qiu, Stochas- tic Exceptional Points for Noise-Assisted Sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 227201 (2023)

    2023

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.