Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Regular hyperbolic lattices and Ginzburg-Landau theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Hyperbolic space allows superconductivity to exist only at the boundary, above the bulk critical temperature.

desk verdict Solid BdG phase diagrams and a clean zero-mode mechanism, but the boundary-only phase above bulk Tc is extrapolated from a tree approximation and the GL 'two types' claim outruns the 1D analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09330 v1 pith:WM6NA3AA submitted 2025-09-11 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Vladimir Bashmakov , Askar Iliasov , Tomáš Bzdušek , Andrey A. Bagrov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-elhep-th PACS 74.20.-z74.20.De74.20.Fg
keywords hyperboliclatticessuperconductivityBogoliubov-deGennesboundaryzero-energymodesGinzburg-Landautheorycurvedspacecriticaltemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that hyperbolic geometry—where every finite patch keeps a large fraction of sites on the boundary—fundamentally changes how s-wave superconductivity behaves. Using Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory on regular hyperbolic lattices, the authors show that while the infinite bulk behaves like a standard BCS superconductor, open hyperbolic flakes develop boundary-enhanced and boundary-only superconducting states that persist at temperatures above the bulk critical temperature. They further show that the exact way the boundary is terminated matters: rough boundaries with dangling bonds host exact zero-energy modes that can raise the critical temperature severalfold. In the continuum, Ginzburg-Landau theory on the hyperbolic plane predicts radial condensate profiles that are impossible in infinite flat space, including two types of superconducting behavior controlled by the ratio of coherence length to curvature radius, with nodal lines playing the role of vortices even without a magnetic field. The payoff is that boundary termination becomes a design knob for superconductivity.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three objects. First, the hyperbolic lattice as an expander graph: every finite-depth patch of {p,q} has boundary sites proportional to its total sites, which makes boundary effects thermodynamically relevant. Second, the Cayley-tree approximation with effective non-integer connectivity given by the shell ratio N_{l+1}/N_l: by imposing that the Hamiltonian acts on shell-symmetric states as it would on a tree, the authors reduce the BdG equations to block-diagonal form tractable for hundreds of shells, and this is the step that produces the boundary-only phase. Third, the zero-energy modes of dangling-bond triplets: on a site-centered flake with ragged boundary, eac

What would settle it

Full self-consistent BdG exact diagonalization on a large {8,3} flake with ragged boundary at half-filling, T=0.1, U=1: if the boundary order parameter does not remain nonzero after the center has become normal, the boundary-only phase is an approximation artifact; separately, if the zero-energy modes predicted from dangling-bond triplets do not appear in the exact spectrum, the T_c-enhancement mechanism is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a regular hyperbolic lattice {p,q}, a finite flake's boundary contains a finite fraction of all sites no matter how large the flake grows, so the boundary is not a perturbation. The paper's central discovery is that this geometric fact turns the boundary into an independent superconducting subsystem: finite hyperbolic flakes support a boundary-only phase whose order parameter stays nonzero near the edge while the center is normal, and whose critical temperature can exceed the bulk value. The mechanism is encoded in the density of states: the Cayley-tree approximation, in which the lattice is replaced by a tree with a shell-dependent effective connectivity, reproduces the boundary profile

Load-bearing premise

The boundary-only superconducting phase above the bulk T_c is derived from the Cayley-tree approximation, which assumes that the shell-averaged Hamiltonian relations of Eq. (7) hold for hyperbolic lattices with an effective non-integer connectivity; the paper verifies this only for small flakes at half-filling and even p, and explicitly notes the approximation breaks down for odd p or away from half-filling, so the large-system claim rests on an extrapolation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Boundary-only superconducting states should appear on large hyperbolic flakes at temperatures well above the bulk T_c, localized near the edge with nearly zero order parameter in the interior.
  • Boundary termination is a control knob: rough boundaries with dangling bonds can raise T_c by several times near half-filling relative to smooth boundaries.
  • Phase diagrams of finite hyperbolic flakes closely track the density of states of the corresponding tight-binding model, so geometric choices (p, q) that reshape the density of states also reshape superconductivity.
  • In the continuum, finite hyperbolic domains with boundaries support radial condensate variations, and for 4R^2 tau > 1 the superconducting state has oscillating profiles with nodal lines—a zero-field analogue of type-II vortex structure.
  • The lattice and continuum results together establish hyperbolic geometry as a platform for engineering boundary-controlled superconductivity, with implications for curved-space condensed matter and holography.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exact zero-energy modes at dangling-bond triplets are a purely local graph feature, so the same T_c enhancement should appear on any bipartite lattice patch containing these motifs—including flat-space nanoribbons with deliberately ragged edges—not only in hyperbolic geometry.
  • The GL result suggests a sharp geometric transition when 4R^2 tau crosses 1; for a fixed material with a fixed coherence length, tuning the local curvature radius of a curved film could switch between monotonic and oscillatory condensate profiles without changing temperature or magnetic field.
  • Because the Cayley-tree approximation breaks down for odd p or away from half-filling, exact diagonalization of odd-p flakes could test whether boundary-only superconductivity is a robust geometric effect or an artifact of the tree ansatz; the paper leaves that boundary of validity open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies s-wave superconductivity on hyperbolic lattices within BdG mean-field theory for the attractive Hubbard model, complemented by a Ginzburg-Landau analysis on the hyperbolic plane. The authors find that uniform/infinite hyperbolic lattices reproduce conventional BCS bulk behavior; finite flakes with open boundaries exhibit boundary-enhanced superconductivity. A Cayley-tree approximation with shell-dependent effective connectivity is introduced and used to predict boundary-only superconducting order at temperatures above the bulk Tc. Numerical BdG solutions for polygon- and site-centered flakes show phase diagrams correlated with the single-particle density of states, and show that dangling-boundary zero modes can raise Tc severalfold. The GL analysis classifies radial condensate profiles in the half-plane into monotonic and oscillatory regimes separated by the Breitenlohner-Freedman-like condition 4R^2 tau = 1, and identifies boundary-only profiles for tau < 0.

Significance. If correct, the prediction of boundary-only superconductivity above bulk Tc in a finite system with no fitting parameters would be a striking result: hyperbolic lattices, with their finite boundary fraction, would provide a geometric route to boundary-controlled superconductivity. The paper has real strengths: the BdG calculations are internally consistent and benchmarked against exact small flakes; the zero-mode construction for dangling triplets (Eq. 13) is explicit and falsifiable; the GL phase-portrait analysis is transparent; and no fitted parameters are used beyond U. However, the above-bulk-Tc boundary-only phase rests entirely on an approximation that is validated only in a parameter regime where it does not yet produce the claimed effect. The significance is therefore conditional until that gap is closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IIC, Figs. 8-9] The abstract's central claim that boundary-only superconducting states persist above the bulk Tc on hyperbolic lattices is supported only by the Cayley-tree approximation. The approximation's defining Eq. (7) imposes exact tree shell-to-shell relations on a graph with loops; its validation (Figs. 4-7) covers site-centered {8,3} flakes with M=8,11 at mu=0. Fig. 6 shows that at M=8 the central and edge critical temperatures coincide, so no boundary-only window exists at that size. The boundary-only state at T=0.1, an order of magnitude above the bulk Tc≈0.01, appears only after extrapolating to M=100-150 (Figs. 8,9), where no exact hyperbolic-lattice comparison is provided. Because the effect emerges precisely in the regime where the approximation is unchecked, the boundary-only phase may be an artifact of the tree model. Please add a direct test on genuine hyperbolic lattices at intermedi
  2. [§IIC, Eqs. (10)-(11)] The generalized non-symmetric sectors constitute the majority of the Hilbert space, yet their weight is set by the ad hoc factor K~_lβ - 1. For a genuine tree this factor counts branches minus one; for a hyperbolic lattice with loops there is no exact degeneracy, and the substitution of a non-integer effective connectivity is uncontrolled. This matters because the self-consistent boundary profile in the tree approximation depends on the relative weight of symmetric and non-symmetric sectors (Eq. 11). The paper validates only the radial average of Δ on small flakes (Figs. 4,7), which cannot distinguish errors in the non-symmetric weight from errors in the symmetric part. Please provide a direct test of the non-symmetric spectrum, e.g., compare the projection of exact eigenstates onto the generalized non-symmetric sectors for M=8/11, or derive the degeneracy from the actual branching struc
  3. [Abstract and §IIIA2] The abstract promises 'two types of superconductivity ... with vortices replaced by lines of vanishing order parameter in the nontrivial type.' The GL section, however, only constructs one-dimensional radial profiles in the half-plane. In the 4R^2 tau > 1 regime, the interpolating solution oscillates in the exponentially small tail (Fig. 17); it is not shown to exist in the disc/annulus with physical boundary conditions, and a radial zero in a 1D profile is not a 'line of vanishing order parameter'. The conclusion also describes this as 'oscillatory behavior,' not as a second type of superconductivity. Moreover, this regime is explicitly outside the usual GL validity (footnote 12), making the claim even more tentative. I recommend either computing genuine 2D (or at least annulus/disc) solutions and characterizing the nodal set, or rewriting the abstract/conclusion to present this regime
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos: 'Caylee' in the captions of Figs. 7-8 and in Appendix A, 'bounary' in the conclusion, 'paramaters' in the caption of Fig. 6, and 'approxmation' in §IIC. Please proofread carefully.
  2. [Eqs. (23)-(24)] Eq. (23) appears to have a missing factor of 1/2 in the eigenvalues at the superconducting fixed points; solving the linearized Eq. (19) gives lambda = (1/(2R))[-1 ± sqrt(1+8R^2 tau)], not (1/R)[...]. Eq. (24) should have sqrt(1 - 4R^2 tau) (which for tau<0 is sqrt(1+4R^2|tau|)), not sqrt(1+4R^2 tau). The qualitative saddle/focus conclusions are unaffected, but the equations should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. IID, Fig. 15 discussion] The sentence 'in the first case superconductivity is absent, while in the second case we find a peak of Tc' is ambiguous. Specify that the polygon-centered flake (Fig. 15a) has no mu=0 peak, while the smooth-boundary site-centered flake (Fig. 15b) does.
  4. [Sec. IIIB] The approximation of replacing the disc metric (15) by the half-plane metric (18) for r/R ≥ 1 is stated without a quantitative error estimate. A numerical check of the errors in the radial equation would make the GL comparison with lattice results more convincing.
  5. [Ref. [40]] Ref. [40] is cited as 'to appear' for key ingredients, including the Cayley-tree gap equations (Appendix A) and the continuous BCS results. If the companion paper is not yet public, readers cannot verify these dependencies; please provide an arXiv number or a fuller derivation of the relied-upon results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central BdG, Cayley-tree-approximation, and GL computations are performed in-paper; self-citations to the companion paper are motivational/technical rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's main claims rest on three self-contained computations: exact BdG diagonalization of finite hyperbolic flakes (Secs. IIB, IID), a Cayley-tree approximation whose only hyperbolic-lattice input is the geometric shell count N_l and which is then solved through the in-paper self-consistent Eq. (12), and a phase-portrait analysis of the GL equation in the hyperbolic half-plane (Sec. III) that is solved explicitly from Eqs. (19)-(20). No parameter is fitted to reproduce the claimed boundary-only superconducting state: the effective connectivity K̃_l = N_{l+1}/N_l is a geometric growth factor, not a superconducting fitting constant, and the boundary-only profile in Fig. 8 is a genuine solution of the approximating model. The companion paper [40] is cited for the standard uniform-gap reduction, for the tree analogue of boundary-only superconductivity, and for the symmetry-adapted basis, but the hyperbolic-lattice results and the zero-mode analysis of dangling bonds are derived here rather than imported. The paper also explicitly discloses the approximation's limitations (it works for even p and μ=0, fails for odd p or μ≠0), and the small-flake exact-diagonalization comparisons provide an independent check of the approximation's qualitative validity. The unresolved issue—that the boundary-only window is extrapolated to M=100–150 while the approximation is validated only at M=8,11—is an approximation-validity concern, not a circular reduction of the conclusion to its input. Self-citations are present but not load-bearing, so no significant circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on mean-field BdG and GL frameworks plus the Cayley-tree approximation. The only hand-set model parameter in the numerics is U=1. No new physical entities are postulated; the 'two types' are solution classes, not new fields.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard coupling U = 1 (in units of hopping t)
    All BdG phase diagrams and Tc values are computed at U=1. The paper does not vary U, so the reported 'several times' enhancement is specific to this coupling strength.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BdG mean-field theory of the attractive Hubbard model correctly describes the superconducting transition on hyperbolic lattices
    Used throughout Sec. II; quantum fluctuations are not included.
  • ad hoc to paper Ginzburg-Landau theory remains valid in the regime 4 R^2 tau > 1, away from the usual Tc vicinity
    Sec. III A 2 and footnote 12 explicitly state this validity question is not addressed, yet the 'two types' claim uses this regime.
  • domain assumption The order parameter phase is constant (alpha=0) in the GL solutions
    Sec. III A states 'we will consider only the case alpha=0', excluding possible complex or winding profiles.
  • ad hoc to paper Shell-averaged Hamiltonian relations of Eq. (7) hold approximately for hyperbolic lattices, enabling the non-integer connectivity tree approximation
    Sec. IIC; validated only for small {8,3} flakes at mu=0 and even p; the paper admits breakdown for odd p and mu != 0.
  • domain assumption The Poincare half-plane metric approximates the Poincare disc metric for r/R > ~1 in annulus/disc analyses
    Sec. III B says this is a 'reasonable approximation already for r/R <=1' but it is not exact near the disc center.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Regular hyperbolic lattices and Ginzburg-Landau theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WM6NA3AA

@misc{pith2026250909330,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Regular hyperbolic lattices and Ginzburg-Landau theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WM6NA3AA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09330}
}
abstract

We study $s$-wave superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces using the Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory for discrete hyperbolic lattices and the Ginzburg-Landau theory for the continuous hyperbolic plane. Hyperbolic lattices maintain a finite fraction of boundary sites regardless of system size, thus fundamentally altering superconductivity through enhanced boundary effects absent in flat space. Within the BCS framework for hyperbolic lattices, uniform systems reproduce standard bulk behavior, whereas finite systems with open boundaries, studied through exact diagonalization and Cayley-tree approximations, exhibit boundary-enhanced superconductivity and boundary-only superconducting states that persist above the bulk critical temperature. Numerical studies further reveal that boundary termination critically determines superconducting properties; in particular, rough boundaries with dangling bonds generate zero-energy modes that raise critical temperatures by several times relative to smooth boundaries. Turning to the complementary Ginzburg-Landau analysis of the hyperbolic plane, we find that finite geometries permit radial variations of the condensate absent in infinite space. Owing to the interplay between coherence length and curvature radius, the theory exhibits two types of superconductivity even without magnetic fields, with vortices replaced by lines of vanishing order parameter in the nontrivial type. Our findings establish hyperbolic geometry as a platform for engineering boundary-controlled superconductivity, opening new directions for physics in curved spaces in condensed matter and holography.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09330 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b), we find that, depending on the boundary conditions, superconducting order parameter can acquire diverse spatial distributions corresponding to boundary-only superconduc￾tivity, boundary-enhanced superconductivity, and boundary￾suppressed superconductivity. In the discrete regime, we show that appropriate choice of boundary geometry can lead to emer￾gence of a large number of zero modes, which, in turn, dras￾tic… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Density of states and (b) the phase diagram for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Illustrations of (a) site-centered flake of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dependence of the superconducting order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spatial distribution of the superconducting order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The spatial profile of the order parameter for the Caylee [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The spatial profile of the order parameter for the Caylee-tree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: There, we show the values of Δ at the center of the Cayley-tree approximation of the hyperbolic {8, 3} lattice for different radial sizes and compare them against the thermody￾namic limit of the infinite {8, 3} lattice. While for smaller tree approximations we find the…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The dependence of the order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Densities of states (DoS) (left panels) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Density of states (DoS) (left panels) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The critical temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Construction of site-centered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. An illustration of the (a) phase trajectories and (b) spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. An illustration of the (a) phase trajectories and (b) spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. An illustration of how the exact solution of the Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Panels (a) and (b) illustrate the definitions of shells for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topological states and flat bands in exactly solvable decorated Cayley trees

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Flat bands on decorated Cayley trees map exactly onto topological edge states of 1D SSH chains, and persist on infinite Bethe lattices by a covering construction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The exponents at the first fixed point are found to be 𝜆1,2 = 1 2𝑅 −1± √ 1−4𝑅 2𝜏 ,(22) which are both real and negative; therefore, this is a stable fixed point (a stable node)

    Poincaré half-plane for4𝑅 2𝜏<1 The system has three fixed points: (𝑞 0, 𝑝0)=(0,0)and(𝑞 0, 𝑝0)=(± √ 2𝜏,0),(21) correspondingtothenormalconductorphaseandtothesuper- conductor phase, respectively. The exponents at the first fixed point are found to be 𝜆1,2 = 1 2𝑅 −1± √ 1−4𝑅 2𝜏 ,(22) which are both real and negative; therefore, this is a stable fixed point (a...

  2. [2]

    However,theseissuesarenotrelevantinthepresent study, and the regime is physically valid

    Poincaré half-plane for4𝑅 2𝜏>1 Next, we lower the temperature even further.12 Note that from the point of view of physics in the hyperbolic plane, the condition4𝑅 2𝜏=1corresponds to the Breitenlohner- Freedman bound [54].13 The phenomena beyond the bound are less discussed since the hyperbolic space is often consid- eredinthecontextoftheantideSitter/Confo...

  3. [3]

    Materials for theQuantumAge

    Poincaré half-plane for𝜏<0 We conclude the analysis of GL equations on the Poincaré half-planebygivingacloserlookatthecaseof𝜏<0,whichin theabsenceofboundariescorrespondstothenormalconductor phase. Indeed, the system (20) admits a single fixed point (𝑞 0, 𝑝0)=(0,0). The exponents are real and of opposite sign, 𝜆1,2 = 1 2𝑅 −1± √ 1+4𝑅 2𝜏 ,(24) FIG. 18. An il...

  4. [4]

    46 and 40

    Eigenstates of Caylee trees In the description of symmetric and nonsymmetric states, we follow Refs. 46 and 40. We consider the Cayley tree with connectivity𝐾and the total number of layers𝑀. Since the central node has𝐾+1branches and the𝑙-th(𝑙=1,···,𝑀) generationofeachbranchhas𝐾 𝑙−1 nodes,thetotalnumberof sites and the dimensionNof the Hilbert space are N=...

  5. [5]

    The first thing that one can notice is that the kinetic part of the BdG Hamiltonianℎin Eq

    Sectors of (non)symmetric states Inthissection,wedescribethesingleparticleHamiltonians of (non)symmetric sectors to prepare the setup for discussing the gap equations in the symmetry-adapted basis. The first thing that one can notice is that the kinetic part of the BdG Hamiltonianℎin Eq. (2) defined on a Cayley tree can be decomposed into a block diagonal...

  6. [6]

    In this section,wederivethemodifiedgapequationinthesymmetry- adapted basis given by Eq

    Modified gap equation In the previous section, we constructed the symmetry- adapted sectors of the single-particle Hamiltonian. In this section,wederivethemodifiedgapequationinthesymmetry- adapted basis given by Eq. (A19). Havingdescribedthe(non)symmetricsectorsandthecorre- sponding blocks of the BdG Hamiltonian, we are set to incor- porate the symmetries...

  7. [7]

    Thomale, Crystallography of hyperbolic lattices, Phys

    I.Boettcher,A.Gorshkov,A.Kollar,J.Maciejko,S.Rayan,and R. Thomale, Crystallography of hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. B105, 125118 (2022)

    2022

  8. [9]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Automorphic bloch theorems for hyperbolic lattices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2116869119 (2022)

    2022

Show all 61 references
  1. [10]

    P.M.Lenggenhager,J.Maciejko,andT.Bzdušek,Non-Abelian HyperbolicBandTheoryfromSupercells,Phys.Rev.Lett.131, 226401 (2023)

    2023

  2. [11]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Hyperbolic band theory, Science Advances7, eabe9170 (2021)

    2021

  3. [12]

    Nagy and S

    Á. Nagy and S. Rayan, On the hyperbolic bloch transform, An- nales Henri Poincaré25, 1713 (2024)

    2024

  4. [13]

    A. Chen, Y. Guan, P. M. Lenggenhager, J. Maciejko, I. Boettcher, and T. Bzdušek, Symmetry and topology of hy- perbolic Haldane models, Phys. Rev. B108, 085114 (2023)

    2023

  5. [14]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, and B. Zhou, Chern insulator in a hyperbolic lattice, Phys. Rev. B105, 245301 (2022)

    2022

  6. [15]

    Tao and Y

    Y.-L. Tao and Y. Xu, Higher-order topological hyperbolic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B107, 184201 (2023)

    2023

  7. [16]

    T.BzdušekandJ.Maciejko,Flatbandsandband-touchingfrom real-space topology in hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, 155146 (2022)

    2022

  8. [17]

    D. M. Urwyler, P. M. Lenggenhager, I. Boettcher, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, and T. Bzdušek, Hyperbolic topological band insu- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 246402 (2022)

    2022

  9. [18]

    C. Sun, A. Chen, T. Bzdušek, and J. Maciejko, Topological linear response of hyperbolic Chern insulators, SciPost Phys. 17, 124 (2024)

    2024

  10. [19]

    Attar and I

    A. Attar and I. Boettcher, Selberg trace formula in hyperbolic band theory, Phys. Rev. E106, 034114 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    R.MosseriandJ.Vidal,Densityofstatesoftight-bindingmod- els in the hyperbolic plane, Phys. Rev. B108, 035154 (2023)

    2023

  12. [21]

    F. R. Lux and E. Prodan, Spectral and Combinatorial Aspects of Cayley-Crystals, Ann. Henri Poincaré25, 3563 (2024)

    2024

  13. [22]

    F. R. Lux and E. Prodan, Converging periodic boundary con- ditions and detection of topological gaps on regular hyperbolic tessellations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176603 (2023)

    2023

  14. [23]

    Stegmaier, L

    A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, R. Thomale, and I. Boettcher, Uni- versality of hofstadter butterflies on hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 166402 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    Ikeda, S

    K. Ikeda, S. Aoki, and Y. Matsuki, Hyperbolic band theory undermagneticfieldanddiracconesonahighergenussurface, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 485602 (2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    Xian, Towards explicit discrete holography: Aperiodic spin chains from hyperbolic tilings, SciPost Phys.13, 103 (2022)

    P.Basteiro,G.D.Giulio,J.Erdmenger,J.Karl,R.Meyer,andZ.- Y. Xian, Towards explicit discrete holography: Aperiodic spin chains from hyperbolic tilings, SciPost Phys.13, 103 (2022)

    2022

  17. [26]

    15, 218 (2023)

    P.Basteiro,R.N.Das,G.D.Giulio,andJ.Erdmenger,Aperiodic spin chains at the boundary of hyperbolic tilings, SciPost Phys. 15, 218 (2023)

    2023

  18. [27]

    Boyle, M

    L. Boyle, M. Dickens, and F. Flicker, Conformal quasicrystals and holography, Phys. Rev. X10, 011009 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    Asaduzzaman, S

    M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, J. Hubisz, R. Nelson, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Holography on tessellations of hyperbolic space, Phys. Rev. D102, 034511 (2020)

    2020

  20. [29]

    A. Chen, J. Maciejko, and I. Boettcher, Anderson localization transitionindisorderedhyperboliclattices,Phys.Rev.Lett.133, 066101 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    Shankar and J

    G. Shankar and J. Maciejko, Hyperbolic Lattices and Two- Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146601 (2024)

    2024

  22. [31]

    A.J.Kollár,M.Fitzpatrick,andA.A.Houck,Hyperboliclattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature571, 45 (2019)

    2019

  23. [32]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, A. Vollhardt, M. Greiter, C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kießling, I. Boettcher, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, andT.Bzdušek,Simulatinghyperbolicspaceonacircuitboard, Nature Communications13, 4373 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    Boettcher, P

    I. Boettcher, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov,Quantumsimulationofhyperbolicspacewithcircuit quantumelectrodynamics: Fromgraphstogeometry,Phys.Rev. A102, 032208 (2020)

    2020

  25. [34]

    S. Dey, A. Chen, P. Basteiro, A. Fritzsche, M. Greiter, M. Kaminski, P. M. Lenggenhager, R. Meyer, R. Sorbello, A.Stegmaier,R.Thomale,J.Erdmenger,andI.Boettcher,Sim- ulating holographic conformal field theories on hyperbolic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 061603 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    A. Götz, G. Rein, J. a. C. Inácio, and F. F. Assaad, Hubbard and heisenberg models on hyperbolic lattices: Metal-insulator transitions, global antiferromagnetism, and enhanced boundary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B110, 235105 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, S. Dey, T. Bzdušek, and J. Maciejko, Hy- perbolic Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 076604 (2025)

    2025

  28. [37]

    Dusel, T

    F. Dusel, T. Hofmann, A. Maity, R. Mosseri, J. Vidal, Y. Iqbal, M.Greiter,andR.Thomale,Chiralgaplessspinliquidinhyper- bolic space, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 256604 (2025)

    2025

  29. [38]

    Mosseri, Y

    R. Mosseri, Y. Iqbal, R. Vogeler, and J. Vidal, Kitaev model onhurwitzhyperbolictilings: Anon-abeliangappedchiralspin liquid, Phys. Rev. B111, L060408 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Vidal and R

    J. Vidal and R. Mosseri, Kitaev model in regular hyperbolic tilings (2025), arXiv:2506.17981 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  31. [40]

    Gluscevich, A

    N. Gluscevich, A. Samanta, S. Manna, and B. Roy, Dynamic mass generation on two-dimensional electronic hyperbolic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B111, L121108 (2025)

    2025

  32. [41]

    Samoilenka and E

    A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Boundary states with elevated critical temperatures in Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B101(2020)

    2020

  33. [42]

    M. D. Croitoru, A. A. Shanenko, Y. Chen, A. Vagov, and J. A. Aguiar, Microscopic description of surface superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B102, 054513 (2020)

    2020

  34. [43]

    C.Hainzl,B.Roos,andR.Seiringer,Boundarysuperconductiv- ity in the BCS model, J. Spectr. Theory12, 1507–1540 (2022)

    2022

  35. [44]

    Barkman, A

    M. Barkman, A. Samoilenka, A. Benfenati, and E. Babaev, Elevated critical temperature at BCS superconductor–band in- sulator interfaces, Phys. Rev. B105, 224518 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    A.Talkachov,A.Samoilenka,andE.Babaev,Microscopicstudy of boundary superconducting states on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, 134507 (2023)

    2023

  37. [46]

    Pavliuk, T

    M. Pavliuk, T. Bzdušek, and A. Iliasov, Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Cayley trees, hyperbolic continuum, and BCS theory, (2025), to appear

    2025

  38. [47]

    Zhu,Bogoliubov de Gennes Method and Its Applications (Springer International Publishing, 2016)

    J.-X. Zhu,Bogoliubov de Gennes Method and Its Applications (Springer International Publishing, 2016)

    2016

  39. [48]

    Placke, G

    B. Placke, G. M. Sommers, N. P. Breuckmann, T. Rakovszky, and V. Khemani, Expansion creates spin-glass order in finite- connectivitymodels: arigorousandintuitiveapproachfromthe theoryofldpccodes, (2025),arXiv:2507.13342[cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [49]

    G. D. Mahan, Energy bands of the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B 63, 155110 (2001). 21

    2001

  41. [50]

    D.AryalandS.Kettemann,Completesolutionofthetightbind- ing model on a cayley tree: strongly localised versus extended states, J. Phys. Commun.4, 105010

  42. [51]

    Ostilli, C

    M. Ostilli, C. G. Bezerra, and G. M. Viswanathan, Spectrum ofthetight-bindingmodeloncayleytreesandcomparisonwith bethe lattices, Phys. Rev. E105, 034123

  43. [52]

    Hamanaka, A

    S. Hamanaka, A. A. Iliasov, T. Neupert, T. Bzdušek, and T. Yoshida, Multifractal statistics of non-hermitian skin effect on the cayley tree, Phys. Rev. B111, 075162 (2025)

    2025

  44. [53]

    Wagreich, The growth function of a discrete group, inGroup Actions and Vector Fields, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol

    P. Wagreich, The growth function of a discrete group, inGroup Actions and Vector Fields, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 956,editedbyJ.B.Carrell(Springer,Berlin,Heidelberg,1982) pp. 125–144

    1982

  45. [54]

    J. W. Cannon and P. Wagreich, Growth functions of surface groups, Mathematische Annalen293, 239 (1992)

    1992

  46. [55]

    Bartholdi and T

    L. Bartholdi and T. G. Ceccherini-Silberstein, Growth series and random walks on some hyperbolic graphs, Monatshefte für Mathematik136, 181 (2002)

    2002

  47. [56]

    Gouezel, A numerical lower bound for the spectral radius ofrandomwalksonsurfacegroups,Combinatorics,Probability and Computing24, 838–856 (2015)

    S. Gouezel, A numerical lower bound for the spectral radius ofrandomwalksonsurfacegroups,Combinatorics,Probability and Computing24, 838–856 (2015)

    2015

  48. [57]

    Dyn.19, 477–493 (2025)

    M.HowarthandT.Nagnibeda,Conetypesandspectralradiusof hyperbolictrianglegroupsandhyperbolictessellations,Groups Geom. Dyn.19, 477–493 (2025)

    2025

  49. [58]

    A.Jahn,Z.Zimborás,andJ.Eisert,Centralchargesofaperiodic holographic tensor-network models, Phys. Rev. A102, 042407 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    Gor’kov, Microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau equations in the theory of superconductivity, Soviet Physics JET9, 1364–1367 (1959)

    L. Gor’kov, Microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau equations in the theory of superconductivity, Soviet Physics JET9, 1364–1367 (1959)

    1959

  51. [60]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Stability in gauged ex- tended supergravity, Annals Phys.144, 249 (1982)

    1982

  52. [61]

    Basteiro, F

    P. Basteiro, F. Dusel, J. Erdmenger, D. Herdt, H. Hinrichsen, R. Meyer, and M. Schrauth, Breitenlohner-Freedman bound on hyperbolic tilings, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091604 (2023)

    2023

  53. [62]

    X.Wang,Z.Nussinov,andG.Ortiz,Emergenceofaboundary- sensitive phase in hyperbolic Ising models, arXiv:2507.21044 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.