Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Axion–photon conversion in the early universe is proposed as a single cause of both the low-frequency radio excess and the deep 21-cm absorption trough.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 19:02 UTC pith:77N6YX3O

load-bearing objection Competent re-derivation and fitting of an already-published mechanism; the EDGES match rests on a free ξ that the paper does not justify, so the unified claim is not yet demonstrated. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.09472 v1 pith:77N6YX3O submitted 2025-09-11 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

Axion-Photon Conversion in FLRW with Primordial Magnetic Fields: Explaining the Radio Excess

Setabuddin , Md Riajul Haque , Rajesh Karmakar , Supratik Pal This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords axion-photon conversionaxion-like particlesprimordial magnetic fieldsARCADE2 radio excessEDGES 21-cm signalresonant conversioncosmic dawnbrightness temperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that one mechanism—resonant conversion of axion-like particles into photons in the presence of nanogauss-level primordial magnetic fields—can account for both the unexplained isotropic radio excess at low frequencies and the anomalously deep cosmic-dawn 21-cm absorption trough. Starting from the axion–photon action in an expanding FLRW universe, it derives the redshift-dependent conversion probability with plasma effects and shows that when the axion mass matches the plasma-induced photon mass, a resonance produces soft photons in the MHz–GHz range. With axion masses around 10^-14 to 10^-12 eV and nearly scale-invariant magnetic field spectra, the resulting brightness temperature fits the observed excess and deepens the 21-cm absorption, while remaining consistent with CMB and ΔN_eff bounds. The paper also shows that magnetic heating from ambipolar diffusion and turbulence in the nearly scale-invariant case shallows the trough, shifting the allowed parameter space.

Core claim

The central claim is that axion–photon conversion after recombination explains both anomalies. The paper derives from first principles, in an FLRW background with a stochastic primordial magnetic field and a plasma, the scale-dependent conversion probability. Resonant conversion occurs at the redshift where the axion mass equals the photon's plasma mass, m_ϕ = ω_pl(z), producing soft photons with a spectrum matching the ARCADE2 excess and enhancing the 21-cm absorption. The viable window is axion masses ~10^-14–10^-12 eV, a coupling g ~5×10^-13 GeV^-1, and magnetic field amplitudes ~0.1–0.9 nG at 1 Mpc, with spectral index close to scale-invariant (n_B = -3 or -2.75). For the scale-invariant

What carries the argument

The central object is resonant axion–photon conversion in a plasma-filled expanding universe: when the axion rest mass m_ϕ equals the photon's plasma mass ω_pl(z) = sqrt(e^2 n_e/m_e), the conversion probability peaks. The paper derives this probability from the axion–photon action linearized about a stochastic primordial magnetic field, treating the coupling g_ϕγ as a perturbation and integrating the phase difference between axion and photon modes over cosmic time. The magnetic power spectrum—scale-invariant (n_B = -3) or nearly scale-invariant (n_B = -2.75)—provides the spatial correlation that drives the conversion, and the plasma frequency sets the resonance redshift.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the residual ionization fraction stays essentially constant at x_e ~10^-4 from recombination to today and that the expansion is matter-dominated throughout the phase integral; if reionization or dark energy shifts x_e or H(z), the resonance redshift—and with it the predicted radio spectrum and 21-cm shape—moves.

What would settle it

Measure the global 21-cm brightness temperature across z~15–30 with a foreground-robust experiment: the model makes a definite prediction of a deep trough whose depth and frequency track the axion mass and magnetic field amplitude. A null detection at the predicted depth, or a measured ionization/recombination history that places the resonance where no trough appears, would rule out the central claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, axion-like particles with masses ~10^-14–10^-12 eV and nanogauss-scale primordial magnetic fields form a common origin for the low-frequency radio background and the 21-cm absorption trough.
  • The predicted brightness temperature reproduces the observed radio excess with a minimum chi-square near 48 and a spectral index beta ~ -2.34 for the best-fit parameters.
  • For scale-invariant PMFs, the 21-cm trough is deepened into the EDGES band for excess-radiation fractions of 5–20%; for nearly scale-invariant PMFs, magnetic heating requires larger fractions, 40–100%.
  • The same mechanism predicts an additional absorption feature during the dark ages near z~100 for axion masses around 2×10^-13 eV, distinguishable from standard astrophysical backgrounds.
  • The scenario remains consistent with CMB spectral-distortion and Delta N_eff bounds, which distinguishes it from dark-photon-based explanations of the excess radio background.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is right, the radio excess and the 21-cm trough become coupled observables: a precise measurement of either signal yields a quantitative prediction for the other, turning two marginal anomalies into a single consistency test.
  • The paper assumes a constant residual ionization fraction and a matter-dominated Hubble expansion in the phase integral; inserting a realistic reionization history would shift the resonance redshift and change the predicted spectra, offering a direct testable extension.
  • The required magnetic amplitudes are close to current CMB upper bounds, so independent constraints on primordial magnetic field strength—even without 21-cm data—could close the parameter window.
  • The soft-photon tail from resonant conversion could also appear as a small spectral distortion at frequencies just above the radio band, providing an avenue for future CMB spectral missions to cross-check the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the resonant axion-photon conversion probability in an FLRW spacetime with a stochastic primordial magnetic field, including plasma effects, and applies it to two low-frequency cosmological anomalies: the ARCADE2 isotropic radio excess and the EDGES 21-cm absorption trough. The authors claim that axion-like particles with masses ~10^-14-10^-12 eV and nanogauss-scale, (nearly) scale-invariant PMFs can jointly explain both signals. The radio excess is fitted with a two-parameter power-law model after adding a minimal extragalactic radio background, yielding a quoted chi^2_min~48 for 10 data points. The 21-cm signal is modelled by adding an axion-induced background T_b(z) to the CMB with a free fractional coefficient xi, which is tuned to 5-20% (scale-invariant PMFs) or 40-100% (nearly scale-invariant PMFs) to match the EDGES band. PMF heating is also included for the nearly scale-invariant case.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would provide a unified, first-principles explanation of two long-standing low-frequency anomalies and open a new window onto axion physics and primordial magnetism. The derivation of the conversion probability with expansion and plasma effects, and the inclusion of PMF heating in the 21-cm signal, are genuinely useful contributions. However, the EDGES match is obtained by tuning a free parameter xi that has no physical derivation, and the ARCADE2 fit is statistically poor; these issues currently prevent the paper from supporting its abstract-level claim of a common origin. The framework may still be of interest as a phenomenological study, but the significance claimed in the title and abstract is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.3) and Figs. 7-8] The EDGES comparison is controlled by the free parameter xi in T_R = T_CMB + xi T_b, tuned to 5-20% (SI) and 40-100% (NSI). This is not a prediction from the axion-PMF mechanism. The same resonantly converted photons that produce the present-day 78 MHz excess are, at z~17, a 1.4 GHz background with brightness temperature (1+z)T_b(nu0). Using the ARCADE2-normalized T_b ~ 750 K at 78 MHz gives T_R(z~17) ~ 1.4e4 K, which would make the 21-cm trough orders of magnitude deeper than EDGES unless xi ~ 1e-3. The manuscript provides no physical mechanism for xi < 1. As written, the abstract's claim to explain both anomalies with one mechanism is not supported; the EDGES signal is fitted, not explained.
  2. [Sec. 4, Table 1 and Fig. 6] The chi^2 analysis excludes the 29.5, 31, and 90 GHz data points because they fall below the CMB temperature. This is a post hoc selection that removes the highest-frequency points where the model has the most difficulty. With the remaining 10 points, the quoted chi^2_min ~ 48 corresponds to reduced chi^2 ~ 6 for a two-parameter power-law fit, which is not a good fit. The statement that the model 'aligns remarkably well' with the data is overstated. The authors should report fits with all 13 data points, justify any exclusion physically or statistically, and provide standard goodness-of-fit diagnostics.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.10)] The plasma contribution is written as Delta_pl(z) = e^2 n_b0 x_e / (2 omega0 m_e) with no redshift factor, whereas n_e = n_b0(1+z)^3 x_e and the conversion integral in Eq. (3.9) imply Delta_pl(z) proportional to (1+z). This discrepancy changes the resonance condition from m_phi^2 proportional to (1+z)^3 to (1+z)^4 and shifts all benchmark resonance redshifts and the resulting T_b(nu). The equation should be corrected and the numerical results recomputed.
  4. [Sec. 3, between Eqs. (3.9) and (3.12)] The calculation assumes a constant ionization fraction x_e ~ 1e-4 for all z from recombination to z=0 and uses a matter-only Hubble rate H(z)=H0 sqrt(Omega_m)(1+z)^{3/2} down to z=0. Reionization changes x_e to O(1) at z<6, and dark energy modifies H(z) at z<1. While the benchmark resonance occurs at z~20, the phase integral extends over the full range, and the predicted T_b(nu) at low frequencies and the 21-cm background can be affected. The robustness of the claimed parameter space to a realistic x_e(z) and full LCDM H(z) should be quantified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Various] There are several typos: 'exsisting' in Sec. 6, 'nuetral' in Appendix B, and 'Robertson-Walker' in the footnote of Sec. 2.
  2. [Sec. 4] The acronym MEGR is used but not defined at first use; please spell out 'minimum extragalactic radiation' and state its origin more explicitly.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.3)] The reference [102] for the xi parameter should be explained in more detail: in Feng & Holder the suppression or fraction may be a phenomenological amplitude, but here xi is applied to a specific predicted background, so the connection is not automatic.
  4. [Fig. 2] The caption states 'same frequency ω0=10 GHz' and the x-axis is redshift; the curves for two axion masses are useful, but the figure would benefit from a legend that distinguishes the SI and NSI cases more clearly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

EDGES 'prediction' is obtained by tuning the free parameter ξ in Eq. (5.3); with ξ=1 the same ARCADE2-matched background overproduces the trough.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5 (Eq. 5.3) and Section 5.1 discussion of Fig. 7 (right panel)]
    "TR(z) =T 0(1 +z) +ξ Tb(z), whereξis a free parameter controlling the fractional contribution of the axion-induced excess radiation to the intergalactic medium [102]. ... If the full radio excess (ξ= 100%) is assumed to contribute, the absorption overshoots the EDGES band. To remain consistent with the data, the axion-induced component must be restricted to ξ∼5%−20%, which keeps the trough depth within the observed range of EDGES anomalies."

    The 21-cm differential brightness temperature (Eq. 5.1) depends on T_R, and Eq. 5.3 inserts ξ T_b with a free ξ. T_b(z) is already fixed by the same conversion probability and parameters used to match ARCADE2. No physical mechanism fixes ξ; the paper scans it until ΔT21 enters the EDGES band (5–20% for scale-invariant, 40–100% for nearly scale-invariant). Thus the EDGES 'prediction' is a second fit parameter, not an independent consequence of the axion-PMF model. The paper itself admits ξ=100% overshoots, so the combined 'explains both' claim requires choosing ξ to match EDGES by construction.

full rationale

The axion-photon conversion framework (Sections 2–3) is derived from the action and is not itself circular: it gives a conversion probability P(z,Δl) whose resonance condition m_φ = ω_pl follows from the equations, and the comparison with ARCADE2 is an explicit chi-square fit over B0 and m_φ with fixed g_φγ and γ_φ. Model fitting alone is not circularity. The circular element is the EDGES step: Eq. (5.3) introduces ξ as a free fractional contribution, and Section 5.1 states that ξ must be restricted to 5–20% (or 40–100% with PMF heating) to keep the trough inside the EDGES band. Because ΔT21 is approximately linear in T_R and hence in ξ, choosing ξ to match EDGES is equivalent to fitting the EDGES depth; the claim to 'explain both' anomalies therefore reduces, for the 21-cm part, to a fitted input rather than a prediction. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the cited prior axion-photon and PMF-heating works are external (Moroi et al., Addazi et al., Raffelt-Stodolsky, Sethi-Subramanian), and the one self-citation (Bhaumik-Paul-Pal for 21-cm PMF constraints) is not used to force a result. No uniqueness theorem is imported. The acknowledged approximations—constant x_e ~ 10^-4 between Eqs. (3.9) and (3.10), and matter-only H(z) in Eq. (3.9)—are limitations on the 'first principles' claim but are not self-referential; they would affect accuracy, not circularity. Overall, the central two-anomaly claim is partially circular because the EDGES prediction is tuned via ξ, so score 6.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

Everything the central claim rests on: the conversion probability is normalized by g_φγ² B0² γ_φ, the resonance depends on the assumed constant x_e, and the EDGES match depends on the free ξ. No new particles or forces are added beyond the already-motivated ALP and PMF.

free parameters (8)
  • ξ (fractional excess contribution) = 5-20% (SI), 40-100% (NSI)
    Introduced in Eq. (5.3); tuned so the 21-cm trough lies in the EDGES band, with different ranges for the two magnetic spectra.
  • B0 (PMF amplitude) = 0.44 nG (SI), 0.58 nG (NSI) at χ²_min, scanned 0.1-1.0 nG
    Sets the conversion probability normalization; fitted to ARCADE2 data in Sec. 4.
  • γ_φ (axion-to-photon density ratio) = 0.03
    Chosen to stay below ΔN_eff ≈ 0.17 (ACT DR6); fixes the overall brightness temperature scale in Eq. (4.8).
  • m_φ (axion mass) = Benchmarks 2×10^-14, 2×10^-13, 2×10^-12 eV; scanned 10^-14-10^-12 eV
    Sets the resonance redshift and the frequency/redshift location of the excess; benchmark chosen to put the peak near z~20.
  • g_φγ (axion-photon coupling) = 5×10^-13 GeV^-1
    Set at the edge of the X-ray bound 6.3×10^-13 GeV^-1; enters P ∝ g².
  • n_B (spectral index) = -3 and -2.75
    Two cases considered; controls the PMF power spectrum and whether magnetic heating is present.
  • Δl (correlation length) = ~1 Mpc
    Set to the coherent length; brightness temperature saturates for Δl < 1 Mpc (Fig. 3).
  • x_e (ionization fraction) = 10^-4 constant
    Assumed redshift-independent despite known recombination and reionization evolution; sets the plasma frequency and hence the resonance.
axioms (8)
  • standard math Perturbative expansion in g_φγ and stationary phase evaluation of the conversion integral
    Appendix A; assumes first-order perturbation theory in the coupling is valid for the axion-photon system.
  • domain assumption A stochastic primordial magnetic field with power spectrum PB(k) ∝ k^{n_B} exists and is isotropic and homogeneous on Mpc scales
    Eqs. (3.1)-(3.2); motivates the background field entering the conversion probability; an input from inflationary magnetogenesis models.
  • domain assumption Axions form a relic background with a frequency-independent energy density ratio γ_φ = Ω_φ/Ω_γ ≈ 0.03
    Sec. 4, Eq. (4.10); sets the normalization of the excess brightness temperature; no production mechanism computed.
  • domain assumption Standard 21-cm brightness temperature and spin-temperature equations, including the Wouthuysen-Field coupling and PMF heating rates
    Sec. 5 and Appendix B, Eqs. (5.1), (B.1)-(B.15); taken from the cited literature.
  • ad hoc to paper x_e(z) is constant at ~10^-4 from recombination to z=0
    Text between Eqs. (3.9) and (3.10); the paper acknowledges this is an approximation that affects the resonance condition.
  • ad hoc to paper H(z) = H0 sqrt(Ωm)(1+z)^{3/2} holds from z=1100 to z=0
    Eq. (3.9); ignores radiation and dark energy contributions to the expansion, changing the phase integral at low z.
  • ad hoc to paper The three highest-frequency ARCADE2/low-frequency points (29.5, 31, 90 GHz) are excluded from the χ² fit because they fall below the CMB baseline
    Sec. 4 after Table 1; a post-hoc selection that improves the fit, not derived from a model of foreground contamination.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetic heating factor fL(nB+3) is defined to vanish at nB=-3, so strictly scale-invariant PMFs produce no heating
    Eq. (B.14) with the given functional form; used to conclude SI spectra do not heat the IGM.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27072 in / 22380 out tokens · 230154 ms · 2026-08-04T19:02:45.562245+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the possibility of axion-photon conversion as a common origin of two low-frequency anomalies: the isotropic radio excess (ARCADE2) and the deep global 21-cm absorption trough (EDGES). From the axion-photon action in an FLRW background with primordial magnetic fields (PMFs), we derive the scale-dependent conversion probability including plasma effects. Resonant conversion, arising when the axion mass matches the plasma-induced photon mass, produces soft photons in the MHz-GHz range. By modeling stochastic PMFs with amplitude $B_0$ and spectral index $n_{\rm B}$, we show that axion-like particles with mass $\sim 10^{-14}$-$10^{-12}\,\mathrm{eV}$ and nanogauss-level nearly scale invariant PMFs can explain both ARCADE2 and EDGES. Heating from PMF dissipation via ambipolar diffusion and turbulent decay reduces the 21-cm trough, shifting the viable parameter space. Our results stem from a consistent theoretical framework developed from first principles and a combined analysis of the radio excess and global 21-cm signal, while remaining consistent with CMB bounds on PMFs and $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$. We conclude that global 21-cm observations may offer potential sensitivity to axions, primordial magnetism, and dark-sector physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axion-photon conversion in stochastic magnetic fields

    hep-ph 2025-12 accept novelty 6.0

    Axion-photon conversion in random Gaussian magnetic fields fixes the expectation values and variances of photon Stokes parameters, including a circular-polarization signal from helical fields.

  2. Probing Axion-Photon conversion via circular polarization imprints in the CMB $V$-mode observations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes that axion-photon conversion in pre-CMB helical magnetic fields imprints detectable V-mode polarization in the CMB, allowing CLASS 40 GHz observations to constrain ALP masses 10^{-10} to 10^{-8} eV and their ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 75 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background, Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background, Nature Rev. Phys.4(2022) 452 [2202.13919]. [2]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [3]

    Hu and S

    W. Hu and S. Dodelson,Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.40(2002) 171 [astro-ph/0110414]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [4]

    Rosenberg, S

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton and G. Efstathiou,CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517(2022) 4620 [2205.10869]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [5]

    Krachmalnicoff, C

    N. Krachmalnicoff, C. Baccigalupi, J. Aumont, M. Bersanelli and A. Mennella, Characterization of foreground emission on degree angular scales for CMB B-mode observations - Thermal dust and synchrotron signal from Planck and WMAP data,Astron. Astrophys.588(2016) A65 [1511.00532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [6]

    Fixsen and et al.,Arcade 2 measurement of the absolute sky brightness at 3–90 ghz, The Astrophysical Journal734(2011) 5

    D.J. Fixsen and et al.,Arcade 2 measurement of the absolute sky brightness at 3–90 ghz, The Astrophysical Journal734(2011) 5

    2011

  6. [7]

    Bowman, A.E.E

    J.D. Bowman, A.E.E. Rogers, R.A. Monsalve, T.J. Mozdzen and N. Mahesh,An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,Nature555(2018) 67 [1810.05912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [8]

    Taylor et al.,First Light for the First Station of the Long Wavelength Array, 1206.6733

    G.B. Taylor et al.,First Light for the First Station of the Long Wavelength Array, 1206.6733

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [9]

    Haslam, C.J

    C.G.T. Haslam, C.J. Salter, H. Stoffel and W.E. Wilson,A 408 MHz all-sky continuum survey. II. The atlas of contour maps,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.47(1982) 1

    1982

  9. [10]

    Kogut et al.,ARCADE 2 Observations of Galactic Radio Emission,Astrophys

    A. Kogut et al.,ARCADE 2 Observations of Galactic Radio Emission,Astrophys. J.734 (2011) 4 [0901.0562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [11]

    Rogers and J.D

    A.E.E. Rogers and J.D. Bowman,Spectral Index of the Diffuse Radio Background Measured From 100 to 200 MHz,Astron. J.136(2008) 641 [0806.2868]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [12]

    Haslam, U

    C. Haslam, U. Klein, C. Salter, H. Stoffel, W. Wilson, M. Cleary et al.Astronomy and Astrophysics100(1981) 209

    1981

  12. [13]

    Reich and W

    P. Reich and W. ReichAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series63(1986) 205

    1986

  13. [14]

    Roger, C.H

    R.S. Roger, C.H. Costain, T.L. Landecker and C.M. Swerdlyk,The radio emission from the galaxy at 22 mhz,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.137(1999) 7 [astro-ph/9902213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [15]

    Guzman, J

    A.E. Guzman, J. May, H. Alvarez and K. Maeda,All-sky Galactic radiation at 45 MHz and spectral index between 45 and 408 MHz,Astron. Astrophys.525(2011) A138 [1011.4298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [16]

    Guzm´ an, J

    A.E. Guzm´ an, J. May, H. Alvarez and K. Maeda,All-sky galactic radiation at 45 mhz and spectral index between 45 and 408 mhz,Astronomy & Astrophysics525(2011) A138

    2011

  16. [17]

    Seiffert et al.,Interpretation of the Extragalactic Radio Background,0901.0559

    M. Seiffert et al.,Interpretation of the Extragalactic Radio Background,0901.0559

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [18]

    Dowell and G.B

    J. Dowell and G.B. Taylor,The Radio Background Below 100 MHz,Astrophys. J. Lett.858 (2018) L9 [1804.08581]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [19]

    Hills, G

    R. Hills, G. Kulkarni, P.D. Meerburg and E. Puchwein,Concerns about modelling of the EDGES data,Nature564(2018) E32 [1805.01421]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [20]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. Nambissan T., R. Subrahmanyan, N. Udaya Shankar, B.S. Girish, A. Raghunathan et al.,On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background, Nature Astron.6(2022) 607 [2112.06778]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [21]

    Sims, J.D

    P.H. Sims, J.D. Bowman, N. Mahesh, S.G. Murray, J.P. Barrett, R. Cappallo et al.,A Bayesian approach to modelling spectrometer data chromaticity corrected using beam factors – I. Mathematical formalism,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521(2023) 3273 [2212.03875]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [22]

    Sims et al.,A Bayesian approach to modelling spectrometer data chromaticity corrected using beam factors – II

    P.H. Sims et al.,A Bayesian approach to modelling spectrometer data chromaticity corrected using beam factors – II. Model priors and posterior odds,2506.20042. – 26 –

    arXiv

  22. [23]

    Price, L.J

    D.C. Price, L.J. Greenhill, A. Fialkov, G. Bernardi, H. Garsden, B.R. Barsdell et al., Design and characterization of the large-aperture experiment to detect the dark age (leda) radiometer systems,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society478(2018) 4193

    2018

  23. [24]

    Chiang et al.,The Array of Long Baseline Antennas for Taking Radio Observations from the Sub-Antarctic,J

    H.C. Chiang et al.,The Array of Long Baseline Antennas for Taking Radio Observations from the Sub-Antarctic,J. Astron. Inst.09(2020) 2050019 [2008.12208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [25]

    de Lera Acedo et al.,The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z≈7.5–28,Nature Astron.6(2022) 998 [2210.07409]

    E. de Lera Acedo et al.,The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z≈7.5–28,Nature Astron.6(2022) 998 [2210.07409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Barkana,Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars,Nature555(2018) 71 [1803.06698]

    R. Barkana,Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars,Nature555(2018) 71 [1803.06698]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [27]

    Fialkov, R

    A. Fialkov, R. Barkana and A. Cohen,Constraining Baryon–Dark Matter Scattering with the Cosmic Dawn 21-cm Signal,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 011101 [1802.10577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [28]

    Mu˜ noz and A

    J.B. Mu˜ noz and A. Loeb,A small amount of mini-charged dark matter could cool the baryons in the early Universe,Nature557(2018) 684 [1802.10094]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [29]

    Barkana, N.J

    R. Barkana, N.J. Outmezguine, D. Redigolo and T. Volansky,Strong constraints on light dark matter interpretation of the EDGES signal,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 103005 [1803.03091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [30]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott,Severely Constraining Dark Matter Interpretations of the 21-cm Anomaly,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 011102 [1803.02804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [31]

    Pospelov, J

    M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, J.T. Ruderman and A. Urbano,Room for New Physics in the Rayleigh-Jeans Tail of the Cosmic Microwave Background,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 031103 [1803.07048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [32]

    Fraser et al.,The EDGES 21 cm Anomaly and Properties of Dark Matter,Phys

    S. Fraser et al.,The EDGES 21 cm Anomaly and Properties of Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B 785(2018) 159 [1803.03245]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [33]

    Brandenberger, B

    R. Brandenberger, B. Cyr and R. Shi,Constraints on Superconducting Cosmic Strings from the Global21-cm Signal before Reionization,JCAP09(2019) 009 [1902.08282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [34]

    Moroi, K

    T. Moroi, K. Nakayama and Y. Tang,Axion-photon conversion and effects on 21 cm observation,Phys. Lett. B783(2018) 301 [1804.10378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [35]

    K. Choi, H. Seong and S. Yun,Axion-photon-dark photon oscillation and its implication for 21 cm observation,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 075024 [1911.00532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [36]

    Acharya, B

    S.K. Acharya, B. Cyr and J. Chluba,The role of soft photon injection and heating in 21 cm cosmology,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 1908 [2303.17311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [37]

    Chianese, P

    M. Chianese, P. Di Bari, K. Farrag and R. Samanta,Probing relic neutrino radiative decays with 21 cm cosmology,Phys. Lett. B790(2019) 64 [1805.11717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [38]

    P.S.B. Dev, P. Di Bari, I. Mart ´ ınez-Soler and R. Roshan,Relic neutrino decay solution to the excess radio background,JCAP04(2024) 046 [2312.03082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [39]

    Fornengo, R

    N. Fornengo, R. Lineros, M. Regis and M. Taoso,Possibility of a Dark Matter Interpretation for the Excess in Isotropic Radio Emission Reported by ARCADE,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 271302 [1108.0569]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [40]

    Acharya and J

    S.K. Acharya and J. Chluba,A closer look at dark photon explanations of the excess radio background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521(2023) 3939 [2209.09063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [41]

    Raffelt and L

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky,Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles,Phys. Rev. D 37(1988) 1237. – 27 –

    1988

  41. [42]

    Mirizzi, G.G

    A. Mirizzi, G.G. Raffelt and P.D. Serpico,Signatures of Axion-Like Particles in the Spectra of TeV Gamma-Ray Sources,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 023001 [0704.3044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [43]

    Caputo, L

    A. Caputo, L. Sberna, M. Frias, D. Blas, P. Pani, L. Shao et al.,Constraints on millicharged dark matter and axionlike particles from timing of radio waves,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 063515 [1902.02695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [44]

    Addazi, S

    A. Addazi, S. Capozziello, Q. Gan, G. Lambiase and R. Samanta,Excess Radiation from Axion-Photon Conversion,2411.09042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. Nakayama and F. Takahashi,Cosmological constraints on axionic dark radiation from axion-photon conversion in the early Universe,JCAP09(2013) 030 [1306.6518]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [46]

    Schleicher, R

    D.R.G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee and R.S. Klessen,Influence of primordial magnetic fields on 21 cm emission,Astrophys. J.692(2009) 236 [0808.1461]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [47]

    Sethi and K

    S.K. Sethi and K. Subramanian,Primordial magnetic fields and the HI signal from the epoch of reionization,JCAP11(2009) 021 [0911.0244]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [48]

    Bhaumik, D

    A. Bhaumik, D. Paul and S. Pal,Revisiting primordial magnetic fields through 21-cm physics: bounds and forecasts,JCAP01(2025) 089 [2407.11923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Arsenadze, A

    G. Arsenadze, A. Caputo, X. Gan, H. Liu and J.T. Ruderman,Shaping dark photon spectral distortions,JHEP03(2025) 018 [2409.12940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    Chluba, B

    J. Chluba, B. Cyr and M.C. Johnson,Revisiting dark photon constraints from CMB spectral distortions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.535(2024) 1874 [2409.12115]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    Aramburo-Garcia, K

    A. Aramburo-Garcia, K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, P. Kashko, J. Pradler, A. Sokolenko et al.,Dark photon constraints from cmb temperature anisotropies,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(2024) 049. [52]ACTcollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,2503.14454. [53]ACTcollaboration,The Atacama...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [54]

    Rossi, C

    G. Rossi, C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille and J. Lesgourgues,Constraints on dark radiation from cosmological probes,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 063505 [1412.6763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [55]

    Mangano and P.D

    G. Mangano and P.D. Serpico,A robust upper limit on neff from bbn, circa 2011,Physics Letters B701(2011) 296

    2011

  53. [56]

    Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    D. Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    doi:10.1017/9781108937092 2022

  54. [57]

    Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Physical Review D23(1981) 347

    A.H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Physical Review D23(1981) 347

    1981

  55. [58]

    Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108 (1982) 389

    A.D. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108 (1982) 389

    1982

  56. [59]

    Mukhanov and G

    V.F. Mukhanov and G. Chibisov,Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe, ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu33(1981) 549

    1981

  57. [60]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Cp conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles,Physical Review Letters38(1977) 1440. – 28 –

    1977

  58. [61]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the invisible axion,Physics Letters B 120(1983) 127

    1983

  59. [62]

    Yamaguchi, M

    M. Yamaguchi, M. Kawasaki and J. Yokoyama,Evolution of axionic strings and spectrum of axions radiated from them,Physical review letters82(1999) 4578

    1999

  60. [63]

    Sikivie,Axions, domain walls, and the early universe,Physical Review Letters48(1982) 1156

    P. Sikivie,Axions, domain walls, and the early universe,Physical Review Letters48(1982) 1156

    1982

  61. [64]

    Graf and F.D

    P. Graf and F.D. Steffen,Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology83(2011) 075011

    2011

  62. [65]

    Carosi, A

    G. Carosi, A. Friedland, M. Giannotti, M.J. Pivovaroff, J. Ruz and J.K. Vogel,Probing the axion-photon coupling: phenomenological and experimental perspectives. A snowmass white paper, inSnowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, 9, 2013 [1309.7035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [66]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz and Lifshits,The Classical Theory of Fields: Volume 2, vol. 2, Butterworth-Heinemann (1975)

    1975

  64. [67]

    Turner and L.M

    M.S. Turner and L.M. Widrow,Inflation Produced, Large Scale Magnetic Fields,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 2743

    1988

  65. [68]

    Addazi, S

    A. Addazi, S. Capozziello and Q. Gan,Resonant graviton-photon transitions with cosmological stochastic magnetic field,Phys. Lett. B851(2024) 138574

    2024

  66. [69]

    Ratra,Cosmological’seed’magnetic field from inflation,Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    B. Ratra,Cosmological’seed’magnetic field from inflation,Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 391, no. 1, May 20, 1992, p. L1-L4. Research supported by California Institute of Technology.391(1992) L1

    1992

  67. [70]

    Kobayashi and M.S

    T. Kobayashi and M.S. Sloth,Early cosmological evolution of primordial electromagnetic fields,Physical Review D100(2019)

    2019

  68. [71]

    Vilchinskii, O

    S. Vilchinskii, O. Sobol, E. Gorbar and I. Rudenok,Magnetogenesis during inflation and preheating in the Starobinsky model,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 083509 [1702.02774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [72]

    Sharma, K

    R. Sharma, K. Subramanian and T.R. Seshadri,Generation of helical magnetic field in a viable scenario of inflationary magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 083503 [1802.04847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [73]

    Sharma, S

    R. Sharma, S. Jagannathan, T.R. Seshadri and K. Subramanian,Challenges in Inflationary Magnetogenesis: Constraints from Strong Coupling, Backreaction and the Schwinger Effect, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 083511 [1708.08119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [74]

    Tripathy, D

    S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, R.K. Jain and L. Sriramkumar,Challenges in the choice of the nonconformal coupling function in inflationary magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 063519 [2111.01478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [75]

    Ferreira, R.K

    R.J.Z. Ferreira, R.K. Jain and M.S. Sloth,Inflationary magnetogenesis without the strong coupling problem,JCAP10(2013) 004 [1305.7151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [76]

    Haque, D

    M.R. Haque, D. Maity and S. Pal,Probing the reheating phase through primordial magnetic field and CMB,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 103540 [2012.10859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [77]

    Bamba and J

    K. Bamba and J. Yokoyama,Large-scale magnetic fields from dilaton inflation in noncommutative spacetime,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083508 [hep-ph/0409237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  75. [78]

    Gasperini, M

    M. Gasperini, M. Giovannini and G. Veneziano,Primordial magnetic fields from string cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 3796 [hep-th/9504083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  76. [79]

    Fujita and R

    T. Fujita and R. Namba,Pre-reheating Magnetogenesis in the Kinetic Coupling Model, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 043523 [1602.05673]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [80]

    Bamba, E

    K. Bamba, E. Elizalde, S.D. Odintsov and T. Paul,Inflationary magnetogenesis with reheating phase from higher curvature coupling,JCAP04(2021) 009 [2012.12742]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  78. [81]

    Bonvin, C

    C. Bonvin, C. Caprini and R. Durrer,Magnetic fields from inflation: The CMB temperature anisotropies,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 083515 [1308.3348]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [82]

    Durrer and A

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov,Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21(2013) 62 [1303.7121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  80. [83]

    Minoda, H

    T. Minoda, H. Tashiro and T. Takahashi,Insight into primordial magnetic fields from 21-cm line observation with EDGES experiment,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488(2019) 2001 [1812.00730]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.