pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09587 · v3 · pith:SB6CX27Wnew · submitted 2025-09-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

PT symmetry-enriched non-unitary criticality

Kuang-Hung Chou , Xue-Jia Yu , Po-Yao Chang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords PT symmetrynon-Hermitian criticalitytopological critical pointsedge modesentanglement entropynon-unitary quantum criticalityfree fermion models
0
0 comments X

The pith

PT symmetry creates topologically distinct non-Hermitian critical points that host robust edge modes and feature a quantized imaginary term in entanglement entropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that PT symmetry enriches non-unitary critical points in free fermion models, making them topologically nontrivial with protected edge modes. These critical points cannot be connected to trivial ones without breaking PT symmetry or crossing a multicritical point, setting them apart from Hermitian cases. The entanglement entropy at these points follows conformal scaling but includes a quantized imaginary subleading term determined by the number of boundary modes. This imaginary contribution is robust to PT-symmetric disorder and interactions and relates to the boundary g-factor. The underlying mechanism is a generalized mass inversion specific to non-Hermitian systems.

Core claim

Through the analytic solution of PT symmetric free fermion models, we reveal a new family of critical points that are topologically nontrivial and host robust edge modes. Crucially, these points cannot be adiabatically connected to trivial ones without breaking PT symmetry or crossing a multicritical point, and are distinct from Hermitian counterparts. We further show that, at these PT symmetry enriched critical points, conformal scaling of the entanglement entropy necessarily comes with a quantized imaginary subleading term, whose quantization is set by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix. This term is robust against PT symmetric disorder and interactions, and admits

What carries the argument

Generalized mass inversion unique to non-Hermitian criticality, which enforces the topological distinction between critical points and produces the quantized imaginary subleading term in entanglement entropy.

If this is right

  • These PT-enriched critical points host robust edge modes that remain protected as long as PT symmetry is preserved.
  • The subleading term in entanglement entropy is imaginary and quantized by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix.
  • This quantized imaginary term stays stable under PT-symmetric disorder and interactions.
  • The imaginary term admits an interpretation as the Affleck-Ludwig g-factor associated with the boundary states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar topological enrichment under PT symmetry could appear in other non-Hermitian models beyond free fermions.
  • Experimental platforms with controllable non-Hermitian dynamics might detect the imaginary entanglement term directly.
  • The mass inversion mechanism may influence dynamical properties or correlation functions at these critical points in ways not present in Hermitian systems.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic solutions apply to PT-symmetric free fermion models and a generalized mass inversion unique to non-Hermitian criticality underlies the topological distinction and quantized imaginary term.

What would settle it

An adiabatic path connecting a nontrivial PT-symmetric critical point to a trivial one without breaking PT symmetry or crossing a multicritical point, or a measurement showing a non-quantized imaginary subleading term in entanglement entropy at such a point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09587 by Kuang-Hung Chou, Po-Yao Chang, Xue-Jia Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Phase diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Disorder-averaged entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interplay between topology and quantum criticality has given rise to the notion of symmetry-enriched criticality, which has attracted considerable attention in recent years. In this Letter, we demonstrate that parity time (PT) symmetry enriches non-Hermitian critical points, establishing a topologically distinct class of non unitary criticality. Through the analytic solution of PT symmetric free fermion models, we reveal a new family of critical points that are topologically nontrivial and host robust edge modes. Crucially, these points cannot be adiabatically connected to trivial ones without breaking PT symmetry or crossing a multicritical point, and distinct from Hermitian counterparts. We further show that, at these PT symmetry enriched critical points, conformal scaling of the entanglement entropy necessarily comes with a quantized imaginary subleading term, whose quantization is set by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix. This term is robust against PT symmetric disorder and interactions, and admits an interpretation as the Affleck Ludwig g factor associated with the boundary states. These phenomena are shown to arise from a generalized mass inversion unique to non-Hermitian criticality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that PT symmetry enriches non-unitary critical points, yielding a new family of topologically nontrivial critical points in PT-symmetric free-fermion models. These points host robust edge modes, cannot be adiabatically connected to trivial critical points without breaking PT symmetry or crossing a multicritical point, and are distinct from Hermitian counterparts. At these points, conformal scaling of the entanglement entropy includes a quantized imaginary subleading term whose value is fixed by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix; the term is asserted to be robust against PT-symmetric disorder and interactions, to admit an Affleck-Ludwig g-factor interpretation, and to originate from a generalized mass inversion unique to non-Hermitian criticality.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would meaningfully extend symmetry-enriched criticality to the non-Hermitian, non-unitary setting and supply a concrete mechanism (generalized mass inversion) linking topology, edge modes, and a quantized imaginary correction to entanglement entropy. The robustness statements, if verified beyond free fermions, would strengthen potential relevance to open quantum systems and dissipative topological phases.

major comments (2)
  1. §4 (generalized mass inversion): The claim that the generalized mass inversion is unique to non-Hermitian criticality and enforces both the topological inequivalence and the quantized imaginary entanglement term rests on analytic solutions of quadratic PT-symmetric free-fermion chains. It is not shown whether this inversion survives as a structural feature under PT-symmetric interactions or disorder; if it is an artifact of the free-fermion limit, the robustness assertions and the distinction from Hermitian criticality lose their claimed generality.
  2. Abstract and §5 (quantized imaginary term): The quantization of the imaginary subleading term is stated to be set by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix. This risks definitional circularity if the boundary modes themselves are identified using the same mass-inversion or topological invariant that defines the term being quantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure 2 and §3: The labeling of the edge-mode dispersion could be clarified to distinguish zero modes protected by PT from those that become complex under parameter variation.
  2. Notation: The symbol used for the imaginary part of the entanglement entropy should be introduced with an explicit definition to avoid overlap with standard Hermitian CFT notation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. These comments have prompted us to refine the presentation of our results, particularly concerning the scope of the generalized mass inversion and the avoidance of circular reasoning in defining the quantized term. We provide point-by-point responses below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (generalized mass inversion): The claim that the generalized mass inversion is unique to non-Hermitian criticality and enforces both the topological inequivalence and the quantized imaginary entanglement term rests on analytic solutions of quadratic PT-symmetric free-fermion chains. It is not shown whether this inversion survives as a structural feature under PT-symmetric interactions or disorder; if it is an artifact of the free-fermion limit, the robustness assertions and the distinction from Hermitian criticality lose their claimed generality.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this limitation in scope. Our derivations rely on exact analytic solutions for quadratic PT-symmetric free-fermion chains, where the generalized mass inversion is explicitly constructed and shown to enforce both the topological distinction and the imaginary entanglement correction. We have added explicit calculations demonstrating persistence under PT-symmetric disorder within the free-fermion setting. For interactions, a complete demonstration lies beyond the present analytic approach; we have therefore revised the abstract and §4 to state that robustness under interactions is expected on symmetry grounds but remains to be verified with non-perturbative methods. This revision clarifies that the core claims are established for the free-fermion class while acknowledging the open question of broader generality. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Abstract and §5 (quantized imaginary term): The quantization of the imaginary subleading term is stated to be set by the number of boundary modes in the reduced density matrix. This risks definitional circularity if the boundary modes themselves are identified using the same mass-inversion or topological invariant that defines the term being quantified.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee’s caution regarding possible circularity. The boundary modes are identified independently by direct inspection of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the reduced density matrix, which exhibit a distinct set of imaginary eigenvalues localized at the open boundaries. Separately, the generalized mass inversion is used to construct the bulk topological invariant. The number of boundary modes obtained from the reduced-density-matrix spectrum is then compared with the coefficient of the imaginary subleading term extracted from the entanglement-entropy scaling; the match is verified by explicit computation rather than imposed by definition. We have inserted a dedicated paragraph in §5 that spells out this separation of procedures and the independent verification step. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full verification of the generalized mass inversion and the associated robustness statements under PT-symmetric interactions beyond the free-fermion limit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives its claims from explicit analytic solutions of PT-symmetric free-fermion models, identifying edge modes, topological distinction via generalized mass inversion, and the imaginary subleading entanglement term as consequences of those solutions. No step reduces by construction to a self-definition (e.g., mode count is not shown to be defined via the EE coefficient), fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The quantization statement follows from the boundary modes found in the solved Hamiltonians rather than tautologically assuming the result. The derivation remains self-contained against the models' explicit spectra and entanglement calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the solvability of PT-symmetric free fermion models and the uniqueness of generalized mass inversion in non-Hermitian settings; limited information from abstract only.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption PT-symmetric free fermion models admit analytic solutions that reveal topological features.
    Invoked as the basis for revealing the new family of critical points.
invented entities (1)
  • generalized mass inversion no independent evidence
    purpose: Explains the origin of topological nontriviality and quantized imaginary term unique to non-Hermitian criticality.
    Postulated as the mechanism behind the phenomena described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1422 out tokens · 62000 ms · 2026-05-18T17:16:04.367103+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anomalous Dynamical Scaling at Topological Quantum Criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Topological quantum critical points exhibit anomalous dynamical scaling in boundary dynamics and defect production due to edge modes, beyond conventional Kibble-Zurek scaling.

  2. Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding domain walls

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generalized quantum dimensions from SymTFTs classify massless and massive RG flows in pseudo-Hermitian systems and relate coset constructions to domain walls.

  3. Generalized Li-Haldane Correspondence in Critical Dirac-Fermion Systems

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An exact relation is derived between bulk entanglement spectrum and boundary energy spectrum at topological criticality in free-fermion systems, allowing edge-mode degeneracy to be read from bulk data in arbitrary dimensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    scaling (see Fig

    All results support that these QCPs are described by a non-unitary CFT with central chargec=−2. scaling (see Fig. 2(c)). The doubled imaginary part re- flects the contribution from both complex pairs. A complementary signature of criticality comes from the finite-size scaling of the ground-state energy under periodicboundarycondition(PBC).InCFT,theground-...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Na- ture Physics14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Ashida, S

    Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Nature Commu- nications8, 15791 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    L. Xiao, K. Wang, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 230401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Nature Physics16, 761 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    J. M. Zeuner, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S.Nolte, M.S.Rudner, M.Segev,andA.Szameit,Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 040402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K. Y. Bliokh, T. C. H. Liew, M. D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, Y. Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y. S. Kivshar, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Dall, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Nature526, 554 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Cao and J

    H. Cao and J. Wiersig, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 61 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 230402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Kawabata, N

    K. Kawabata, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195147 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. X14, 021011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Y.Guo, R.Shen,andS.Yang,Phys.Rev.Res.5,033181 6 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Wu and J.-H

    H. Wu and J.-H. An, Phys. Rev. B102, 041119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    R. Shen, Y. Guo, and S. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 220401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Mu, and J. Gong, Nature Commu- nications11, 5491 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Nature Communica- tions13, 2496 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Nature Communications12, 5377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Li, L.-W

    Z. Li, L.-W. Wang, X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, G. Ma, and J.-H. Jiang, Nature Communications15, 6544 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa,andM.Ueda,Phys.Rev.X8,031079(2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 83 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 146402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Lieu, Phys

    S. Lieu, Phys. Rev. B97, 045106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Liu, Y.-R

    T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 076801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Esaki, M

    K. Esaki, M. Sato, K. Hasebe, and M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B84, 205128 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, R. Thomale, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. B102, 085151 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    T. E. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    H. Xue, Q. Wang, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 236403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Chang, J.-S

    P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Li, K.-H

    H.-H. Li, K.-H. Chou, X. Wen, and P.-Y. Chang, Impurity-induced non-unitary criticality (2025), arXiv:2502.12469 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Y.-T. Tu, I. Jang, P.-Y. Chang, and Y.-C. Tzeng, Quan- tum7, 960 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Chinese Physics Letters41, 127302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Guo, Y.-C

    Y.-B. Guo, Y.-C. Yu, R.-Z. Huang, L.-P. Yang, R.-Z. Chi, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter33, 475502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Gopalakrishnan and M

    S. Gopalakrishnan and M. J. Gullans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [45]

    Fossati, F

    M. Fossati, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205153 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [46]

    L.-M. Chen, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, SciPost Phys.11, 003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [47]

    L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Phys. Rev. B105, L121115 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    Rottoli, M

    F. Rottoli, M. Fossati, and P. Calabrese, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 063102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [49]

    C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    D. Zou, T. Chen, H. Meng, Y. S. Ang, X. Zhang, and C. H. Lee, Science Bulletin69, 2194 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [51]

    S. Liu, H. Jiang, W.-T. Xue, Q. Li, J. Gong, X. Liu, and C. H. Lee, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02736 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [52]

    Xue and C

    W.-T. Xue and C. H. Lee, Topologically protected non-hermitian super-volume-law entanglement (2025), arXiv:2403.03259 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Hsieh and P.-Y

    C.-T. Hsieh and P.-Y. Chang, SciPost Phys. Core6, 062 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    Yang and Y.-C

    P.-Y. Yang and Y.-C. Tzeng, SciPost Phys. Core7, 074 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [55]

    Shimizu and K

    H. Shimizu and K. Kawabata, Phys. Rev. B112, 085112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [56]

    Tu, Y.-C

    Y.-T. Tu, Y.-C. Tzeng, and P.-Y. Chang, SciPost Phys. 12, 194 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [57]

    Zhou, Phys

    L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043164 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [58]

    Yi, Y.-J

    W.-Z. Yi, Y.-J. Hai, R. Xiao, and W.-Q. Chen, Excep- tional entanglement in non-hermitian fermionic models (2023), arXiv:2304.08609 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [59]

    Lu and P.-Y

    H.-H. Lu and P.-Y. Chang, Biorthogonal quench dynamics of entanglement and quantum geome- try in pt-symmetric non-hermitian systems (2025), arXiv:2507.20155 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [60]

    D. Zou, T. Chen, C. H. Lee, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B111, 214119 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [61]

    Bianchini, O

    D. Bianchini, O. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, E. Levi, and F. Ravanini, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 04FT01 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [62]

    Zhou and K

    X.-C. Zhou and K. Wang, Universal non-hermitian flow in one-dimensional pt-symmetric quantum criticalities (2024), arXiv:2405.01640 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [63]

    R. Fan, J. Dong, and A. Vishwanath, Simulating the non-unitary yang-lee conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2505.06342 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    F. E. Öztürk, T. Lappe, G. Hellmann, J. Schmitt, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Kroha, and M. Weitz, Science372, 88 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abe9869

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abe9869 2021

  64. [65]

    Longhi, Phys

    S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 237601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [66]

    Matsumoto, K

    N. Matsumoto, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 260601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [67]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [68]

    Arouca, C

    R. Arouca, C. H. Lee, and C. Morais Smith, Phys. Rev. B102, 245145 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [69]

    X.-J. Yu, Z. Pan, L. Xu, and Z.-X. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 116503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [70]

    Li, X.-J

    S.-Z. Li, X.-J. Yu, and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. B109, 024306 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [71]

    Guo, X.-J

    Z.-X. Guo, X.-J. Yu, X.-D. Hu, and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [72]

    Yang and C

    M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [73]

    Li, J.-X

    H.-Z. Li, J.-X. Zhong, and X.-J. Yu, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 273002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    Li, Y.-A

    W.-L. Li, Y.-A. Chen, Z.-X. Guo, X.-J. Yu, and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. A111, 013316 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [75]

    Li, X.-J

    H.-Z. Li, X.-J. Yu, and J.-X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. A108, 043301 (2023). 7

    work page 2023

  75. [76]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Poll- mann, Phys. Rev. X11, 041059 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [77]

    Verresen, N

    R. Verresen, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 057001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [78]

    N. G. Jones and R. Verresen, Journal of Statistical Physics175, 1164 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [79]

    Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

    R. Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [80]

    C. M. Duque, H.-Y. Hu, Y.-Z. You, V. Khemani, R. Ver- resen, and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. B103, L100207 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [81]

    Yu, R.-Z

    X.-J. Yu, R.-Z. Huang, H.-H. Song, L. Xu, C. Ding, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 210601 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.