Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Dimensionality reduction of optically generated vortex strings in a charge density wave

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A shallow-penetrating light pulse makes the vortex strings created after a quench behave as two-dimensional objects rather than three-dimensional ones.

desk verdict Solid experimental result, but the 'dimensionality reduction' claim is over-interpreted: the -4 linecut exponent is likely an orientation effect, not a change in defect dimensionality. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09819 v1 pith:FJOXVHDO submitted 2025-09-11 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Sajal Dahal , Alex H. Miller , Viktor Krapivin , Gal Orenstein , Ryan A. Duncan , Nicholas Leonard , Matthew J. Hurley , Jade Stanton
show 6 more authors
Roman Mankowsky Henrik Lemke Anisha Singh Ian Fisher Mariano Trigo Samuel W. Teitelbaum
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords chargedensitywavevortexstringstopologicaldefectsdimensionalityreductiontime-dependentGinzburg-Landaupump-probex-rayscatteringcriticalexponentsopticalpenetrationdepth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the spatial shape of a femtosecond light pulse—specifically how shallowly it penetrates a crystal—can set the effective dimensionality of the topological defects formed when a charge density wave is driven out of equilibrium. In a pump-probe x-ray experiment on Pd-intercalated ErTe$_3$, the authors find that the structure-factor tail falls off as a power law with exponent $\eta = -4.06 \pm 0.12$, not the $\eta = -5$ expected for a three-dimensional system with a two-component order parameter. They interpret the difference as a reduction from three-dimensional vortex strings to an effectively two-dimensional population, because the pump only melts the order within its optical penetration depth. If true, this means light can be used to engineer not just when a material transitions but also the topology of the defects it leaves behind, and those defects survive far longer than the electronic recovery.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the power-law tail of the time-resolved x-ray structure factor, $|S(q)| = B q^{\eta}$, measured along the surface-normal direction in reciprocal space. For a quenched system with an $n$-component order parameter in $d$ spatial dimensions, theory gives $\eta = -(n+d)$; for this incommensurate CDW $n=2$, so the bulk prediction is $\eta = -5$. The measured $\eta \approx -4$ is read as $d=2$. The argument is carried by a three-dimensional time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model built on a nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation for the complex order parameter $\varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)$, with a photoexcitation term $\alpha(\mathbf{r}, t) \propto e^{-t/\tau} e^{-z/\delta}$ that confines the quench to the optical penetration depth $\delta$; the simulation reproduces $\eta = -4$ and shows vortex strings confined to a planar domain wall.

What would settle it

Measure the structure-factor tail on the same crystal after a spatially uniform quench—for example, with a pump wavelength whose penetration depth exceeds the sample thickness or with excitation through a transparent substrate—and compare $\eta$. If $\eta$ returns to $-5$, the shallow-depth explanation is confirmed; if it stays near $-4$, the exponent is set by linecut geometry or scattering-volume truncation rather than by defect dimensionality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the finite optical penetration depth of the pump imposes a new length scale that lowers the effective dimensionality of the CDW vortex strings from $d=3$ to $d=2$, and that this shows up as a measurable change in the universal power-law tail of the x-ray structure factor. Using the relation $\eta = -(n+d)$ with $n=2$ for the complex CDW order parameter, the bulk prediction is $\eta = -5$. The measured value is $\eta = -4.04 \pm 0.43$ averaged across runs (with $\eta = -4.06 \pm 0.12$ in the main fit), matching $d=2$. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations with an exponentially decaying pump profile reproduce $\eta = -4$ and show vortex strings born in a single two-dimensional domain wall; the same simulations also show a steeper $\eta = -2$ tail from persistent phase modes. The data collapse onto a universal scaling curve with a subdiffusive coarsening exponent $\gamma = -0.30 \pm 0.05$, indicating slow, defect-mediated ordering.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation collapses if the universal relation $\eta = -(n+d)$ does not apply to this experiment or if the scattering tail is not dominated by the topological defects; the finite penetration depth could then merely truncate the scattering volume or change what the linecut samples without actually reducing the dimensionality of the defects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In photoinduced CDW transitions, the spatial profile of the pump is not a minor detail: the penetration depth sets the effective dimensionality of the vortex strings that mediate recovery.
  • Vortex strings produced this way persist for timescales orders of magnitude longer than the electronic recovery time, so transient defect structures can be long-lived.
  • The same dynamical scaling framework that describes uniform quenches continues to apply, but with a reduced effective-dimensionality exponent, so scaling collapses can be used to detect this regime.
  • Structuring the light in space—for example with transient gratings or plasmonic nanostructures—should give additional control over where and how defect planes form.
  • Neither a purely coherent nor a uniform-quench picture describes the dynamics; the finite quench time, finite penetration depth, and amplitude-mode timescale together set the final state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is generic, other light-induced phase transitions with strongly absorbing pumps should show a similar effective-dimensionality reduction; a systematic scan of $\eta$ versus pump penetration depth $\delta$ across materials would test this directly.
  • The paper does not separate the in-plane and out-of-plane contributions to the tail, but the planar confinement of vortex strings implies an anisotropic structure factor, so a two-dimensional map of the scattering around the CDW peak should show a directional dependence of $\eta$ that a single linecut cannot reveal.
  • Because the effective defect plane is aligned with the sample surface, structured illumination such as crossed beams or transient gratings could create patterned arrays of defect planes, effectively writing topology into the material; this would be a testable extension beyond the uniform-spot excitation reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved optical pump, x-ray probe experiments on Pd-intercalated ErTe3, measuring the evolution of diffuse scattering around the CDW satellite peak after femtosecond excitation. The authors observe dynamical scaling of the differential intensity along a b*-direction linecut, extract a coarsening exponent gamma = -0.30 ± 0.05, and extract a structure-factor tail exponent eta = -4.06 ± 0.12 (mean -4.04 ± 0.43 across runs). Since the expected value for a three-dimensional complex order parameter is eta = -(n+d) = -5, the authors interpret the difference as a reduction of the effective dimensionality of the topological-defect system to d = 2, caused by the finite optical penetration depth. A three-dimensional time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulation with an exponentially depth-dependent excitation produces vortex strings confined to a plane and reproduces a b*-linecut tail of eta = -4, which the authors present as corroboration. The conclusion is framed as evidence that the spatial structure of light can control the dimensionality and orientation of topological defects in quantum materials.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the paper would demonstrate a new and experimentally accessible control knob for topological-defect dimensionality in photoinduced phase transitions, with potential consequences for stabilizing metastable electronic states. The experimental data appear nontrivial and are reported with care: universal collapse is shown, the coarsening exponent is extracted from multiple runs, and the TDGL simulation reproduces several qualitative features of the measurement. However, the load-bearing step—converting a linecut exponent into a statement about the dimensionality of the defect system—is not fully justified, and the simulation is constructed with the proposed cause built in. The measured exponent is a real and interesting result, but the paper currently overstates what it establishes. The distinction between reduced dimensionality and linecut anisotropy of an oriented defect gas is testable and should be resolved before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, paragraph beginning 'The main discrepancy...' and Fig. 3(c)] The conversion of the linecut exponent eta ≈ -4 into a reduced dimensionality d = 2 through eta = -(n+d) is valid for an isotropic gas of topological defects, but the proposed mechanism produces a strongly anisotropic defect distribution: vortex strings confined to a single plane. In that anisotropic case, a linecut along the plane normal (b*) can return eta = -(n+2) even if the order parameter and the defect system remain embedded in three dimensions. The paper's own Fig. 3(c) caption states that the eta = -4 tail is 'a direct result of the initial spatial orientation of the vortex strings to the plane of the domain wall,' which is exactly the anisotropic-defect scenario. The authors should compute the angle-averaged (spherically integrated) structure factor from the same simulation. If that tail is eta = -5 while only the b* linecut is -4, then the conclusion must be reframed as a linecut/anisotropy effect rather than a reduction in the dimensionality of the topological-defect system.
  2. [Sec. 5, Eq. (4) and Fig. 3] The TDGL simulation is constructed with the proposed cause already built in: Eq. (4) imposes a depth-dependent excitation with delta = 60 nm, and the simulation then shows that vortex strings are confined to the resulting domain wall. This makes the simulation a consistency check of the proposed mechanism, not an independent test that discriminates it from the alternative that a linecut through an oriented three-dimensional defect gas yields the same exponent. To strengthen the claim, the authors should run a control simulation with uniform excitation in z (delta -> infinity) and show that the b* linecut tail reverts to eta = -5 while all other parameters are held fixed. They should also report the angle-averaged structure-factor tail for the main simulation. Without these controls, the abstract's statement that the interpretation is 'corroborated by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations' overstates the evidentiary weight.
  3. [Sec. 3, Fig. 2(b,d)] The extraction of the key exponent eta is not fully specified. The black fit region in Fig. 2(b,d) is selected from the interpolated average of all time delays, but the selection criterion for the q/qmax fit range is not stated, and the individual points in Fig. 2(d) are shown without error bars. The quoted uncertainty eta = -4.06 ± 0.12 therefore reflects only the fit to the interpolated average and does not include point-wise uncertainties or model-selection uncertainty. Since the entire dimensionality claim rests on the difference between -4 and -5, the authors should state the fit-range selection rule, report the exponent with and without the interpolation step, and provide uncertainties that include the scatter across time delays.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, first paragraph after the abstract] The word 'tritellruide' appears in 'the CDW order in a rare-earth tritellruide'; it should be 'tritelluride'.
  2. [Sec. 5, discussion of Eq. (4)] The sentence defining eta0 reads 'eta0 is proportional to the the fluence'; the duplicate 'the' should be removed.
  3. [Fig. 2(c) caption] The caption says 'Red crosses indicate all points extracted and blue circles enclose the points used for the fit (corresponding to the red points in (a))', but Fig. 2(a) is described as using red circles. The color/point-style nomenclature should be made consistent across all panels.
  4. [Fig. 3(c) caption] The caption uses 'qt' without defining the scaling variables q and t, and states 'times t^gamma' without specifying the gamma value in the scalar-plot description; the caption should define the axes and the scaling factor explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured exponent is an independent input, the scaling relation is externally sourced, and the TDGL agreement is a consistency check rather than a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is not circular. The measured linecut exponent η = −4.06 ± 0.12 is an independent experimental input, and the benchmark η = −(n+d) = −5 is taken from external scaling theory (Mondello & Goldenfeld 1990; Bray & Rutenberg 1994; Bray & Humayun 1993), not from the present claim. The TDGL simulation is a forward model that includes the proposed optical penetration depth α(r,t) ∝ e^{−z/δ} and then outputs an oriented vortex-string state; its agreement with the measured linecut exponent is a consistency check of the mechanism rather than a derivation of the conclusion from the conclusion. The paper explicitly labels the result an 'apparent' or 'effective' dimensionality, and the remaining concern—that the same linecut exponent could arise from a 3D anisotropic defect distribution—is a scientific inference/completeness issue (the angle-averaged structure factor is not shown), not a circular reduction. Self-citations to Ref. [1] are used for prior LaTe3 measurements and simulation methodology, while the load-bearing scaling relation is also supported by external Refs. [26,28,29]; no argument reduces to a self-citation chain. Therefore no circular step is present in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on prior theoretical relations (η=-(n+d)) and on simulation inputs (ξ, Ω0, δ, etc.) that are not independently measured in this paper, but no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • ξ (TDGL spatial stiffness) = 1.2 nm
    Sets the length scale of order parameter gradients in the simulation; from prior modeling [1,13].
  • Ω0 (amplitude mode frequency) = 2π×1.7 THz
    Sets the oscillation timescale in the TDGL equation; taken from prior measurements.
  • η0 (excitation strength) = 1.25
    Proportional to fluence, chosen to represent the strong photoexcitation; not independently measured in this work.
  • τ (excitation lifetime) = 1 ps
    Carrier recombination time used in α(r,t); assumed.
  • δ (optical penetration depth) = 60 nm
    Used in the simulation to set the depth-dependent quench profile; not directly measured here (experiment quotes x-ray penetration depth 100 nm).
  • Γ (damping) = 0.12/Ω0^2
    Phenomenological damping in Eq. 3; chosen to match relaxation.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The structure factor tail follows the universal power law |S(q)| = B q^η with η = -(n+d) for topological defects (n=2, d=3).
    Invoked to interpret the measured exponent; from RG/Ginzburg-Landau theory and prior work [1,28]. If this relation does not hold for a depth-dependent quench, the dimensionality assignment fails.
  • domain assumption The time-dependent scattering at finite wavevectors (region I) arises from antiphase domain walls containing vortex strings.
    Identification based on prior work in LaTe3 and SmTe3 [1,13,19]; no direct real-space imaging in this experiment.
  • domain assumption The TDGL equation (nonlinear Klein-Gordon) with Langevin noise describes the CDW order parameter dynamics.
    Model used for simulations; standard but not derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimensionality reduction of optically generated vortex strings in a charge density wave." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FJOXVHDO

@misc{pith2026250909819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimensionality reduction of optically generated vortex strings in a charge density wave},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FJOXVHDO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09819}
}
abstract

In phase transitions, mesoscale structures such as topological defects, vortex strings, and domain walls control the path towards equilibrium, and thus the functional properties of many active devices. In photoinduced phase transitions driven by femtosecond laser excitation, the temporal (pulse duration) and spatial (penetration depth) structure of the optical excitation present opportunities for control and creating structures with unique topologies. By performing time-resolved optical pump, x-ray probe experiments on the CDW system Pd-intercalated ErTe$_{3}$, we gain access to the nanoscale dynamics of the mesoscale topological features (vortex strings) produced after a quench, which have a different apparent dimensionality than the topological defects predicted from the bulk system. We show that these vortex strings persist for much longer than the electronic recovery time. The critical exponent obtained from power-law scaling of the intensity as a function of wavevector shows a reduction in the effective dimensionality of the topological defects in the system, corroborated by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations. Our results demonstrate a novel pathway to use light to control the dimensionality and orientation of topological defects in quantum materials, which could be used to stabilize competing quantum states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) A schematic of the pump-probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) The linecut with the “domain wing” (region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Linecut of the simulated diffraction with the regions I (wh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Orenstein, R

    G. Orenstein, R. A. Duncan, G. A. de la Pe˜ na Mu˜ noz, Y. Huang, V. Krapivin, Q. Le Nguyen, S. Teitelbaum, A. G. Singh, R. Mankowsky, H. Lemke, M. Sander, Y. Deng, C. Arrell, I. R. Fisher, D. A. Reis, and M. Trigo, Dynamical Scaling Reveals Topological Defects and Anomalous Evolution of a Photoinduced Phase Tran- sition, Physical Review X 15, 031058 (202...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, To- wards properties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Materials 16, 1077 (2017), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Hiroshi, 6 - Defects in Metals, in Physical Metallurgy (Fifth Edition) , edited by D

    N. Hiroshi, 6 - Defects in Metals, in Physical Metallurgy (Fifth Edition) , edited by D. E. Laughlin and K. Hono (Elsevier, Oxford, 2014) pp. 561–637

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    S. Wall, S. Yang, L. Vidas, M. Chollet, J. M. Glow- nia, M. Kozina, T. Katayama, T. Henighan, M. Jiang, T. A. Miller, D. A. Reis, L. A. Boatner, O. Delaire, and M. Trigo, Ultrafast disordering of vanadium dimers in photoexcited VO2, Science 362, 572 (2018), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    A. S. Johnson, E. Pastor, S. Batlle-Porro, H. Benzidi, T. Katayama, G. A. de la Pe˜ na Mu˜ noz, V. Krapivin, S. Kim, N. L´ opez, M. Trigo, and S. E. Wall, All-optical seeding of a light-induced phase transition with corre- lated disorder, Nature Physics 20, 970 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    T.-R. T. Han, F. Zhou, C. D. Malliakas, P. M. Duxbury, S. D. Mahanti, M. G. Kanatzidis, and C.- Y. Ruan, Exploration of metastability and hidden phases in correlated electron crystals visualized by fem- tosecond optical doping and electron crystallography, Science Advances 1, e1400173 (2015), publisher: Amer- ican Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 9, 1387 (1976)

    1976

  8. [8]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature 317, 505 (1985), publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    work page 1985

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    J. Lal, L. B. Lurio, D. Liang, S. Narayanan, S. B. Darling, and M. Sutton, Universal dynamics of coarsening dur- ing polymer-polymer thin-film spinodal dewetting kinet- ics, Physical Review E 102, 032802 (2020), publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  2. [10]

    Mondello and N

    M. Mondello and N. Goldenfeld, Scal- ing and vortex-string dynamics in a three- dimensional system with a continuous symmetry, Physical Review A 45, 657 (1992), publisher: American Physical Society

    1992

  3. [11]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Lee, A. A. Husain, L. Delacretaz, M. Zhu, G. de la Pe˜ na Munoz, S. X.-L. Sun, Y. I. Joe, A. H. Reid, S. F. Wandel, G. Coslovich, W. Schlotter, T. van Driel, J. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, S. Hartnoll, N. Gold- enfeld, and P. Abbamonte, Ultrafast time-resolved x- ray ...

    2019

  4. [12]

    Vogelgesang, G

    S. Vogelgesang, G. Storeck, J. G. Horstmann, T. Diek- mann, M. Sivis, S. Schramm, K. Rossnagel, S. Sch¨ afer, and C. Ropers, Phase ordering of charge den- sity waves traced by ultrafast low-energy electron diffraction, Nature Physics 14, 184 (2018), aDS Bib- code: 2018NatPh..14..184V

    2018

  5. [13]

    Trigo, P

    M. Trigo, P. Giraldo-Gallo, J. N. Clark, M. E. Koz- ina, T. Henighan, M. P. Jiang, M. Chollet, I. R. Fisher, J. M. Glownia, T. Katayama, P. S. Kirchmann, D. Leuenberger, H. Liu, D. A. Reis, Z. X. Shen, and D. Zhu, Ultrafast formation of domain walls of a charge density wave in...

    2021

  6. [14]

    Hsieh, M

    W.-P. Hsieh, M. Trigo, D. A. Reis, G. Andrea Arti- oli, L. Malavasi, and W. L. Mao, Evidence for photo- induced monoclinic metallic VO2 under high pressure, Applied Physics Letters 104, 021917 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Huber, S

    T. Huber, S. Mariager, A. Ferrer, H. Sch¨ afer, J. John- son, S. Gr¨ ubel, A. L¨ ubcke, L. Huber, T. Kubacka, C. Dornes, C. Laulhe, S. Ravy, G. Ingold, P. Beaud, J. Demsar, and S. Johnson, Coherent Structural Dy- namics of a Prototypical Charge-Density-Wave-to-Metal Transition...

    2014

  8. [16]

    G. A. de la Pe˜ na Mu˜ noz, A. A. Correa, S. Yang, O. Delaire, Y. Huang, A. S. Johnson, T. Katayama, V. Krapivin, E. Pastor, D. A. Reis, S. Teitelbaum, L. Vi- das, S. Wall, and M. Trigo, Ultrafast lattice disorder- ing can be accelerated by electronic collisional forces, Natur...

    2023

  9. [17]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y.-Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Baldini, E. Erge¸ cen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, H. Zhou, J. Straquadine, P. Walmsley, P. E. Dolgirev, A. V. Rozhkov, I. R. Fisher, P. Jarillo- Herrero, B. V. Fine, and N. Gedik, Evidence for topological defects in...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Wandel, F

    S. Wandel, F. Boschini, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Shen, M. X. Na, S. Zohar, Y. Wang, S. B. Welch, M. H. Seaberg, J. D. Koralek, G. L. Dakovski, W. Hettel, M.- F. Lin, S. P. Moeller, W. F. Schlotter, A. H. Reid, M. P. Minitti, T. Boyle, F. He, R. Sutarto, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Ha...

    2022

  11. [19]

    L. Kong, R. Shindou, and Z. Sun, Fate of transient or- der parameter domain walls in ultrafast experiments, npj Quantum Materials 10, 1 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Ru, Charge density wave formation in rare-earth Tritellurides, PhD, Stanford University (2008)

    N. Ru, Charge density wave formation in rare-earth Tritellurides, PhD, Stanford University (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Iguchi, J

    Y. Iguchi, J. A. Straquadine, C. Murthy, S. A. Kivelson, A. G. Singh, I. R. Fisher, and K. A. Moler, Anomalous Superfluid Density in a Disordered Charge-Density-Wave Material: Pd-Intercalated ${\mathrm{ErTe}} {3}$, Physical Review Letters 133, 036001 (2024), publisher: American...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Ingold, R

    G. Ingold, R. Abela, C. Arrell, P. Beaud, P. B¨ ohler, M. Cammarata, Y. Deng, C. Erny, V. Esposito, U. Flechsig, R. Follath, C. Hauri, S. Johnson, P. Ju- ranic, G. F. Mancini, R. Mankowsky, A. Mozzan- ica, R. A. Oggenfuss, B. D. Patterson, L. Patthey, B. Pedrini, J. Rittmann, ...

    2019

  15. [23]

    E. Prat, R. Abela, M. Aiba, A. Alarcon, J. Alex, Y. Arbelo, C. Arrell, V. Arsov, C. Bacellar, C. Beard, 7 P. Beaud, S. Bettoni, R. Biffiger, M. Bopp, H.-H. Braun, M. Calvi, A. Cassar, T. Celcer, M. Chergui, P. Chevtsov, C. Cirelli, A. Citterio, P. Craievich, M. C. Divall, A. Dax...

    2020

  16. [24]

    A. G. Singh, M. D. Bachmann, J. J. Sanchez, A. Pandey, A. Kapitulnik, J. W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, S. A. Kivelson, and I. R. Fisher, Emergent tetragonality in a fundamentally orthorhombic mate- rial, Science Advances 10, eadk3321 (2024), publisher: American Association for the Advan...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Mozzanica, A

    A. Mozzanica, A. Bergamaschi, S. Cartier, R. Di- napoli, D. Greiffenberg, I. Johnson, J. Jungmann, D. Maliakal, D. Mezza, C. Ruder, L. Schaedler, B. Schmitt, X. Shi, and G. Tinti, Prototype characteri- zation of the JUNGFRAU pixel detector for SwissFEL, Journal of Instrumentati...

  18. [26]

    A. J. Bray and A. D. Rutenberg, Growth laws for phase ordering, Physical Review E 49, R27 (1994), publisher: American Physical Society

    1994

  19. [27]

    G. F. Mazenko and M. Zannetti, Instability, spinodal de - composition, and nucleation in a system with continu- ous symmetry, Physical Review B 32, 4565 (1985), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    1985

  20. [28]

    Mondello and N

    M. Mondello and N. Goldenfeld, Scaling and vortex dy- namics after the quench of a system with a continu- ous symmetry, Physical Review A 42, 5865 (1990), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    1990

  21. [29]

    A. J. Bray and K. Humayun, Universal ampli- tudes of power-law tails in the asymptotic struc- ture factor of systems with topological defects, Physical Review E 47, R9 (1993), publisher: American Physical Society

    1993

  22. [30]

    Yusupov, T

    R. Yusupov, T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, S. Bra- zovskii, P. Kusar, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and D. Mihailovic, Coherent dynamics of macroscopic elec- tronic order through a symmetry breaking transition, Nature Physics 6, 681 (2010), publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    2010

  23. [31]

    P. E. Dolgirev, M. H. Michael, A. Zong, N. Gedik, and E. Demler, Self-similar dynamics of order pa- rameter fluctuations in pump-probe experiments, Physical Review B 101, 174306 (2020), publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  24. [32]

    Trigo, P

    M. Trigo, P. Giraldo-Gallo, M. E. Kozina, T. Henighan, M. P. Jiang, H. Liu, J. N. Clark, M. Chollet, J. M. Glownia, D. Zhu, T. Katayama, D. Leuenberger, P. S. Kirchmann, I. R. Fisher, Z. X. Shen, and D. A. Reis, Coherent order parameter dynamics in SmTe3, Physical Review B 99,...

    2019

  25. [33]

    Maklar, Y

    J. Maklar, Y. W. Windsor, C. W. Nicholson, M. Pup- pin, P. Walmsley, V. Esposito, M. Porer, J. Rittmann, D. Leuenberger, M. Kubli, M. Savoini, E. Abreu, S. L. Johnson, P. Beaud, G. Ingold, U. Staub, I. R. Fisher, R. Ernstorfer, M. Wolf, and L. Rettig, Nonequilibrium charge-den...

    2021

  26. [34]

    T. Danz, T. Domr¨ ose, and C. Ropers, Ultrafast nanoimaging of the order parameter in a structural phase transition, Science 371, 371 (2021), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2021

  27. [35]

    A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, A. Kogar, Y. Su, X. Shen, J. A. Straquadine, X. Wang, D. Luo, M. E. Koz- ina, A. H. Reid, R. Li, J. Yang, S. P. Weath- ersby, S. Park, E. J. Sie, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, E. Demler, and N. Gedik, Role of Equilibrium Fluctuations in Li...

    2021

  28. [36]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straqua- dine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, S. Weathersby, S. Park, M. E. Kozina, E. J. Sie, H. Wen, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Light-induced charge density wave...

    2020

  29. [37]

    H. Li, N. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Song, Y. Sun, M.-L. Ng, T. Sato, D. Hanlon, S. Dahal, M. D. Balcazar, V. Es- posito, S. She, C. C. Ornelas-Skarin, J. Vila-Comamala, C. David, N. Berndt, P. R. Miedaner, Z. Zhang, M. Ihme, M. Trigo, K. A. Nelson, J. B. Hastings, A. A. Maznev, L. Fo...

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. R. Rouxel, D. Fainozzi, R. Mankowsky, B. R¨ osner, G. Seniutinas, R. Mincigrucci, S. Catalini, L. Foglia, R. Cucini, F. D¨ oring, A. Kubec, F. Koch, F. Ben- civenga, A. A. Haddad, A. Gessini, A. A. Maznev, C. Cirelli, S. Gerber, B. Pedrini, G. F. Mancini, E. Raz- zoli, M. B...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Bencivenga, R

    F. Bencivenga, R. Cucini, F. Capotondi, A. Battis- toni, R. Mincigrucci, E. Giangrisostomi, A. Gessini, M. Manfredda, I. P. Nikolov, E. Pedersoli, E. Principi, C. Svetina, P. Parisse, F. Casolari, M. B. Danailov, M. Kiskinova, and C. Masciovecchio, Four-wave mixing experiments...

    2015

  32. [40]

    H. Wang, D. W. Brandl, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, Plasmonic Nanostructures: Artifical Molecules, Accounts of Chemical Research 40, 53 (2007), pub- lisher: American Chemical Society

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.