Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The paper claims that Landau quantum critical points amplify genuine multipartite entanglement in compact subregions (three-spin clusters), whereas beyond-Landau critical points suppress such small-scale GME and redistribute it into larger,

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 18:21 UTC pith:AZMPCASE

load-bearing objection A credible small-subregion fingerprint separating Landau and non-Landau QCPs, but the advertised 'redistribution into larger loops' is an inference, not a measurement. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.09983 v1 pith:AZMPCASE submitted 2025-09-12 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Entanglement architecture of beyond-Landau quantum criticality

Menghan Song , Ting-Tung Wang , Liuke Lyu , William Witczak-Krempa , Zi Yang Meng This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el quant-ph
keywords genuine multipartite entanglementquantum critical pointdeconfined quantum criticalityentanglement microscopyquantum Monte Carloresonating valence bondemergent gauge theorybeyond-Landau paradigm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the way quantum entanglement is shared among small clusters of spins can tell apart ordinary Landau quantum critical points from exotic beyond-Landau ones. Using quantum Monte Carlo to reconstruct the full reduced density matrix of tiny subregions, and computing the genuine multipartite negativity (GMN), the authors find a sharp dichotomy: at conventional O(2)/O(3) Wilson-Fisher critical points, entanglement within the smallest three-spin clusters peaks exactly at the transition, while at XY* and Néel–VBS 'deconfined' critical points (and in a critical resonating-valence-bond state), three-spin entanglement is absent and what entanglement remains sits in larger, loop-shaped regions. If correct, the spatial pattern of multipartite entanglement is a universal fingerprint of the underlying critical theory, one that entropy alone cannot resolve. The authors further show that where GMN vanishes, the subregion state is biseparable, strengthening the link.

Core claim

The central discovery is a dichotomy in the entanglement architecture of quantum critical points. For Landau-type transitions, the genuine multipartite negativity is enhanced at criticality in compact subregions, including the minimal three-spin L-shaped cluster, with a peak at the QCP for O(2) and O(3) Wilson-Fisher transitions. For non-Landau transitions — the XY* transition of the BFG kagome model, the Néel–VBS transition of the JQ3 model, and the critical RVB wavefunction — GMN vanishes in three-spin and other unicursal non-loopy regions, survives only in loopy or cross-shaped regions, and either vanishes or develops a local minimum at the QCP rather than a peak. The minimal multipartite

What carries the argument

The central tool is entanglement microscopy: unbiased quantum Monte Carlo sampling (stochastic series expansion with directed loops) of reduced density matrices of small subregions, followed by computation of the genuine multipartite negativity via a semidefinite program. GMN is an entanglement monotone that detects genuine multipartite entanglement; a zero value is inconclusive, so the authors complement it with adaptive polytope certification of biseparability. The geometric classification of subregions into unicursal (single-loop, e.g., three-site L, four-site line), non-unicursal (cross-shaped), and loopy (plaquette, bowtie, hexagon) configurations is what carries the argument: the dicho

Load-bearing premise

The JQ3 model's finite-size pseudo-critical behavior (L=24, beta=96, pinning field 0.01) is taken as representative of non-Landau critical entanglement even though the thermodynamic Néel–VBS transition may be weakly first-order; if that window is a finite-size artifact, the non-Landau side of the dichotomy loses its key lattice-model support.

What would settle it

Measure the three-spin GMN across the JQ3 Néel–VBS transition at larger system sizes (L>24) or in a model with a confirmed continuous deconfined quantum critical point; if a positive three-spin GMN peak appears at the QCP, the claimed absence of three-spin GME at non-Landau criticality is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • GMN spatial patterns can serve as fingerprints to locate non-Landau quantum critical points and distinguish them from Landau ones.
  • The vanishing three-party hexagon GMN at the XY* QCP acts as a nonlocal order parameter for ferromagnetic ordering in that model.
  • The disappearance of five-party cross-shaped GMN at the Néel–VBS transition provides a Néel order parameter.
  • The minimal multipartite entangled subregion (MMES) is a new diagnostic: three-spin L-shape for Landau QCPs versus larger loopy regions for non-Landau ones.
  • The architecture is shared by the JQ3 model and the critical RVB state, suggesting universality across emergent gauge theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dichotomy holds, small-subregion GMN could be measured in cold-atom or Rydberg simulators to detect deconfined criticality without needing the topological entanglement entropy.
  • The loopy structure might connect to the loop-gas or string-net representation of emergent gauge fields; a testable extension is to compute GMN on larger loops in loop models to see if the same suppression on small non-loopy regions appears.
  • The authors' reliance on the pseudo-critical window for JQ3 suggests a sharper test: measure the same GMN fingerprints in a lattice model believed to realize a true continuous DQCP with larger system sizes; if the three-spin absence persists, the architecture is intrinsic, not a finite-size artifact.
  • The GMN dichotomy may provide a way to classify quantum critical points without knowing the order parameter, using the geometry of entanglement rather than its amount.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses quantum Monte Carlo sampling of reduced density matrices—'entanglement microscopy'—to compute genuine multipartite negativity (GMN) for small subregions (up to six sites) across conventional O(2)/O(3) Wilson-Fisher transitions, the XY* transition in the BFG kagome model, the JQ3 Néel-VBS transition, and the critical resonating valence bond (RVB) wavefunction. The central claim is a dichotomy: Landau criticality amplifies GMN in compact, non-loopy subregions (notably the three-spin L-shape), while non-Landau criticality suppresses GMN in such regions and 'redistributes' entanglement into larger, loopy configurations. The authors support negative statements (absence of three-spin GMN, vanishing of non-loopy GMN in unicursal regions) with QMC data and certify some zero-GMN states as biseparable using an adaptive polytope method. Exact diagonalization at L=3 for the BFG model and a newly developed RVB sampler provide cross-checks. However, the positive claim about 'larger, loopy configurations' is not directly measured: no subregion larger than a six-site hexagon is simulated, and the hexagon GMN at the XY* QCP is extrapolated to zero in the thermodynamic limit.

Significance. If the dichotomy holds, the paper would introduce a genuinely new, multipartite-entanglement-based fingerprint distinguishing Landau from beyond-Landau quantum criticality, going beyond the coarse-grained information contained in entanglement entropy. The small-subregion suppression pattern at non-Landau critical points—absence of three-spin GMN, loss of non-loopy GMN, and local minima instead of peaks—is a concrete, falsifiable diagnostic that could be applied to other candidate deconfined critical points. The work has notable methodological strengths: QMC RDM sampling is standard and cross-validated by ED, the RVB sampling is carefully explained and size-converged, and the BSEP certification directly addresses the limitation that vanishing GMN is inconclusive for GME. The pinning-field study for JQ3 quantifies the systematic effect of the symmetry-breaking field. These elements make the negative part of the dichotomy credible. The positive 'redistribution to larger loops' claim, however, is currently an extrapolation rather than an observation, and the JQ3 data rest on a pseudo-critical window that the authors themselves flag as weakly first-order.

major comments (3)
  1. [Conclusion and outlook; Fig. 3 inset; Table I] The abstract and conclusion state that non-Landau criticality 'redistributes entanglement into larger, loopy configurations,' and Table I claims the MMES at the XY* QCP is 'larger than' a single hexagon. This is the positive, architecture-defining half of the dichotomy, yet no subregion larger than six sites is sampled anywhere in the manuscript. The only support is the extrapolation to zero of the hexagon GMN (Fig. 3 inset) plus the absence of GMN in smaller regions. The data are equally consistent with global suppression of GME at the QCP rather than redistribution to larger loops. To make the advertised claim, the authors must either directly measure GMN in larger subregions (e.g., 8- or 10-site loops) or explicitly reframe the conclusion as an inference, not a measured architecture.
  2. [Fig. 3 inset; 'GMN at Landau and beyond-Landau QCPs'] The conclusion that the XY* hexagon GMN vanishes thermodynamically rests on a power-law fit aL^{-b}+c to only three even system sizes (L=4,6,8), despite visible even-odd oscillations in the raw data. With only three points and a three-parameter fit, the extracted c≈0 is not robust. The authors should show the fit including odd sizes, alternative functional forms, and error bars on c; otherwise the 'vanishing GMN' result, which is load-bearing for the 'larger than a hexagon' claim, is not established to the standard used elsewhere in the paper.
  3. [JQ3 paragraph and Fig. 4] The Néel-VBS data at L=24, β=96, δ=0.01 are used as a second example of non-Landau criticality even though the paper acknowledges the thermodynamic transition is weakly first-order and the small-size behavior is pseudo-critical. The four-party plaquette GMN shows a local minimum at q≈0.6, but it is unclear whether this minimum reflects deconfined criticality or finite-size coexistence/pseudo-critical effects. Since the non-Landau leg of the dichotomy depends on this identification, the authors should provide a concrete check—for example, a scaling analysis of the GMN minimum as a function of L, or a comparison with a known pseudo-critical model—to show that the GMN feature is a property of the putative deconfined theory and not of the first-order transition's finite-size precursor.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table I] The table is incomplete in the main text: the 'MMES' row for the XY* case reads 'larger than' with no continuation. Please complete the table or remove it if it is only a schematic.
  2. [Introduction and Methods] The terms 'unicursal' and 'non-unicursal' are used repeatedly but never defined. A one-sentence definition at first use (e.g., a region whose site graph contains no loop) would greatly improve readability.
  3. [Genuine multipartite entanglement] Equation (1) defining GMN is unnumbered, while later references to 'Eq. (1)' would benefit from an explicit number. Also, the notation N_{M|M}(ρ) for negativity is introduced but not consistently used.
  4. [Supplemental Material, Fig. S2(e)] The phrase 'sudden-deathtemperature' is missing a space; also 'N7' is used for the hexagon three-party GMN without defining the subscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

We find no circular reduction in the derivation chain. The QCP locations and universality classes (O(2)/O(3), XY*, Néel-VBS) are taken from external literature (Refs. [18-22,26-31]), not derived from the GMN data; the GMN values are computed by QMC/RVB sampling of RDMs, so the reported signatures (peaks at Landau QCPs, suppression/absence at non-Landau QCPs) are independent measurements rather than consequences of the model definitions. The finite-size extrapolation of the hexagon GMN uses a power-law fit with c as a fitted parameter, but the conclusion that the MMES is larger than a hexagon is an extrapolation, not a self-fulfilling definition. The 'redistribution to larger loopy configurations' is an inference from the measured suppression in small subregions; it is a logical gap (larger subregions were not directly measured) but not a circularity. Self-citations [11-13] supply the entanglement-microscopy method and prior QSL/Ising benchmarks; the paper reproduces or extends those results with new data, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The acknowledged weakly first-order nature of the JQ3 transition is a correctness/finite-size concern, not a circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard QMC/RDM sampling and SDP, on literature values of critical couplings, and on the assumption that zero GMN plus selected BSEP certifications establishes absence of GME. The free parameters are finite-size fit constants and the pinning field; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Finite-size fit for hexagon GMN (a,b,c) = c close to 0 (not reported numerically)
    Fit to even sizes L=4,6,8 at the XY* QCP; the conclusion that hexagon three-party GMN vanishes thermodynamically depends on c being a free fitting parameter.
  • Finite-size fit for RVB plaquette GMN (a,c) = c small (extrapolates to a tiny value)
    Power-law fit a L^-2 + c for loopy subregions; used to argue the four-party plaquette GMN is tiny in the thermodynamic limit.
  • Pinning field strength delta = 0.01 (at L=24, beta=96)
    Ad hoc perturbation on J2 bonds to lift VBS degeneracy; chosen by hand after checking that larger delta disturbs the QCP and Neel-phase GMN (SM Fig. S4).
axioms (6)
  • standard math GMN positivity is a sufficient but not necessary condition for genuine multipartite entanglement; zero GMN is inconclusive unless states are proven biseparable.
    Definition in Eq. (1); the paper closes the gap via adaptive polytope BSEP certification [46].
  • domain assumption The cited critical couplings and universality classes are accurate (g_c=2.735(2) for O(2), 1.90951(1) for O(3), (Jplus/Jz)_c=0.07076(2) for XY*, q_c=0.59864(4) for JQ3).
    Used to place all QMC cuts at the transitions; taken from Refs. [18-22,26,27].
  • domain assumption JQ3 at L=24 is in the pseudo-critical regime that faithfully encodes beyond-Landau physics despite the weakly first-order thermodynamic transition.
    Acknowledged in the JQ3 paragraph; all Neel-VBS GMN data in Fig. 4 depend on it.
  • domain assumption The RVB wavefunction is a representative of critical states with an emergent U(1) gauge field.
    Used to claim universality; based on Refs. [44,45].
  • domain assumption SSE sampling of reduced density matrices converges to ground-state values in the chosen temperature windows.
    SM Fig. S2 energy plateaus and GMN convergence; temperature windows shaded in blue.
  • standard math Adaptive polytope certification correctly decides biseparability for the sampled states.
    Method of Ref. [46]; used in the 'Beyond multiparty negativity' section.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12835 in / 18363 out tokens · 196415 ms · 2026-08-04T18:21:37.281973+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement architecture of beyond-Landau quantum criticality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AZMPCASE

@misc{pith2026250909983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement architecture of beyond-Landau quantum criticality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AZMPCASE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09983}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantum critical points beyond the Landau paradigm exhibit fractionalized excitations and emergent gauge fields. Here, we use entanglement microscopy--full tomography of the reduced density matrix of small subregions and subsequent extraction of their quantum correlations--to resolve the entanglement architecture near such exotic critical points. We focus on genuine multipartite entanglement (GME). Through unbiased quantum Monte Carlo sampling of RDMs across conventional O(2)/O(3) Wilson-Fisher transitions, and unconventional XY$^*$, and N\'eel-VBS transitions in (2+1)d, we discover a dichotomy: Landau criticality amplifies GME within compact subregions, while non-Landau criticality redistributes entanglement into larger, loopy configurations. Key signatures at non-Landau criticality include the absence of three-spin GME, and the loss of non-loopy entanglement in unicursal regions. Similar results in a critical resonating valence bond wavefunction confirm this multipartite entanglement structure as a common feature of emergent gauge theories. Our findings reveal a distinct entanglement architecture in beyond-Landau quantum critical theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09983 by Liuke Lyu, Menghan Song, Ting-Tung Wang, William Witczak-Krempa, Zi Yang Meng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a), typical unicursal subregions show complete GMN extinction near criticality, except for the four￾party GMN in the loopy plaquette. Importantly, this remaining GMN shows a local minimum at the QCP, which directly opposes the typical Landau-type peak in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: presents GMN results for RVB wavefunc￾tions, computed using our generalized entanglement mi￾croscopy algorithm (see SM [17] for a detailed descrip￾tion), which are converged with system size to reflect thermodynamic behavior. Notably, RVB entanglement reflects non-Landau criticality: three-spin GMN is ab￾sent, unicursal subregions show no non-loopy GMN, which agrees with previous studies with L = 6 exact w… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Precise computation of universal corner entanglement entropy at 2+1 dimension: From Ising to Gaussian quantum critical points

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    Bubble-basis projector QMC extracts the universal corner log-coefficient of Rényi entanglement entropy at (2+1)d Ising and Gaussian quantum critical points as 0.020(1) and 0.025(1), the latter matching the analytic va...

  2. Fate of entanglement in open quantum spin liquid: Time evolution of its genuine multipartite negativity upon sudden coupling to a dissipative bosonic environment

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Time evolution of genuine multipartite negativity in the open Kitaev quantum spin liquid shows persistence in loopy subregions in Markovian regime and at higher temperatures in non-Markovian regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    E. M. L. L. P. P. Landau, Lev Davidovich,Statis- tical physics: theory of the condensed state, Vol. 9 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980)

    1980

  3. [3]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the Landau- Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B70, 144407 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    Kulchytskyy, C

    B. Kulchytskyy, C. M. Herdman, S. Inglis, and R. G. Melko, Detecting Goldstone modes with entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. B92, 115146 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    E. M. Stoudenmire, P. Gustainis, R. Johal, S. Wessel, and R. G. Melko, Corner contribution to the entangle- ment entropy of strongly interacting O(2) quantum criti- cal systems in 2+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B90, 235106 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    P.Bueno, R.C.Myers,andW.Witczak-Krempa,Univer- sality of Corner Entanglement in Conformal Field Theo- ries, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 021602 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Da Liao, M

    Y. Da Liao, M. Song, J. Zhao, and Z. Y. Meng, Ex- tracting universal corner entanglement entropy during the quantum Monte Carlo simulation, Phys. Rev. B110, 235111 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological Entanglement En- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    Swingle and T

    B. Swingle and T. Senthil, Structure of entanglement at deconfined quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B86, 155131 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    S. V. Isakov, M. B. Hastings, and R. G. Melko, Topologi- cal entanglement entropy of a Bose–Hubbard spin liquid, Nature Physics7, 772 (2011)

    2011

  11. [11]

    L. Lyu, M. Song, T.-T. Wang, Z. Y. Meng, and W. Witczak-Krempa, Multiparty entanglement mi- croscopy of quantum Ising models in one, two, and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B111, 245108 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    L. Lyu, D. Chandorkar, S. Kapoor, S. Takei, E. S. Sørensen, and W. Witczak-Krempa, Multiparty entan- glement loops in quantum spin liquids, arXiv:2505.18124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    T.-T. Wang, M. Song, L. Lyu, W. Witczak-Krempa, and Z. Y. Meng, Entanglement microscopy and tomography in many-body systems, Nature Communications16, 96 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Jungnitsch, T

    B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Taming Mul- tiparticle Entanglement, Physical Review Letters106, 190502 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Balents, M

    L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. M. Girvin, Fraction- alization in an easy-axis Kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B65, 224412 (2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    Hofmann, T

    M. Hofmann, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Analytical characterization of the genuine multiparticle negativity, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 155301 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    The supplemental material details our algorithm for sam- pling reduced density matrices in RVB wavefunctions and computing GMN via semidefinite programming, and presents additional numerical data for the BFG andJ Q3 models

  18. [18]

    Zhao, Y.-C

    J. Zhao, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, Scaling of Entanglement Entropy at Deconfined Quan- tum Criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010601 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    N. Ma, P. Weinberg, H. Shao, W. Guo, D.-X. Yao, and A. W. Sandvik, Anomalous Quantum-Critical Scaling CorrectionsinTwo-DimensionalAntiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 117202 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Hasenbusch and T

    M. Hasenbusch and T. Török, High-precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D XY-universality class, Journal of 7 Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 6361 (1999)

    1999

  21. [21]

    Ma, G.-Y

    N. Ma, G.-Y. Sun, Y.-Z. You, C. Xu, A. Vishwanath, A. W. Sandvik, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynamical signature of fractionalization at a deconfined quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B98, 174421 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    S. V. Isakov, R. G. Melko, and M. B. Hastings, Univer- sal Signatures of Fractionalized Quantum Critical Points, Science335, 193 (2012)

    2012

  23. [23]

    S.V.Isakov, Y.B.Kim,andA.Paramekanti,Spin-Liquid Phase in a Spin-1/2Quantum Magnet on the Kagome Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 207204 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    Wang, X.-F

    Y.-C. Wang, X.-F. Zhang, F. Pollmann, M. Cheng, and Z.Y.Meng,QuantumSpinLiquidwithEvenIsingGauge FieldStructureonKagomeLattice,Phys.Rev.Lett.121, 057202 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Y.-C. Wang, M. Cheng, W. Witczak-Krempa, and Z. Y. Meng, Fractionalized conductivity and emergent self- duality near topological phase transitions, Nature Com- munications12, 5347 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    A. W. Sandvik, Evidence for Deconfined Quantum Criti- calityinaTwo-DimensionalHeisenbergModelwithFour- Spin Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 227202 (2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    J. Lou, A. W. Sandvik, and N. Kawashima, Anti- ferromagnetic to valence-bond-solid transitions in two- dimensional SU(N)Heisenberg models with multispin in- teractions, Phys. Rev. B80, 180414 (2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    M. Song, J. Zhao, M. Cheng, C. Xu, M. Scherer, L. Janssen, and Z. Y. Meng, Evolution of entanglement entropy at SU(N) deconfined quantum critical points, Science Advances11, eadr0634 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Z. Deng, L. Liu, W. Guo, and H.-Q. Lin, Diagnosing Quantum Phase Transition Order and Deconfined Criti- cality via Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 100402 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    J. Zhao, Z. Y. Meng, Y.-C. Wang, and N. Ma, Scaling of Disorder Operator and Entanglement Entropy at Easy- Plane Deconfined Quantum Criticalities, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2406.02681 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Takahashi, H

    J. Takahashi, H. Shao, B. Zhao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, SO(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quan- tum magnets, arXiv:2405.06607

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    D’Emidio and A

    J. D’Emidio and A. W. Sandvik, Entanglement Entropy and Deconfined Criticality: Emergent SO(5) Symmetry and Proper Lattice Bipartition, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166702 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang, Theory of deconfined pseudocriti- cality, Phys. Rev. B102, 020407 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: Sym- metries and Dualities, Phys. Rev. X7, 031051 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    D.-C. Lu, C. Xu, and Y.-Z. You, Self-duality protected multicriticality in deconfined quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B104, 205142 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B59, R14157 (1999)

    1999

  37. [37]

    Mao, Y.-M

    B.-B. Mao, Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang, S. Hu, and Z. Yan, Sampling reduced density matrix to extract fine levels of entanglement spectrum and restore entanglement Hamil- tonian, Nature Communications16, 2880 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E66, 046701 (2002)

    2002

  39. [39]

    Liang, B

    S. Liang, B. Doucot, and P. W. Anderson, Some New Variational Resonating-Valence-Bond-Type Wave Func- tions for the Spin-1 2 Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Model on a Square Lattice, Physical Review Letters61, 365–368 (1988)

    1988

  40. [40]

    A. F. Albuquerque and F. Alet, Critical Correlations for Short-Range Valence-Bond Wave Functions on the Square Lattice, Phys. Rev. B82, 180408 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Y. Tang, A. W. Sandvik, and C. L. Henley, Properties of Resonating-Valence-Bond Spin Liquids and Critical Dimer Models, Phys. Rev. B84, 174427 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    Zhang and K

    X. Zhang and K. S. D. Beach, Resonating valence bond trial wave functions with both static and dynamically determined Marshall sign structure, Phys. Rev. B87, 094420 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Torlai and R

    G. Torlai and R. G. Melko, Corner entanglement of a resonating valence bond wavefunction, arXiv:2402.17211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Wen and P

    X.-G. Wen and P. A. Lee, Theory of Underdoped Cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 503 (1996)

    1996

  45. [45]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott in- sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  46. [46]

    Ohst, X.-D

    T.-A. Ohst, X.-D. Yu, O. Gühne, and H. C. Nguyen, Certifyingquantumseparabilitywithadaptivepolytopes, SciPost Phys.16, 063 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Zhao, B.-B

    J. Zhao, B.-B. Chen, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, Measuring Rényi entanglement entropy with high efficiency and precision in quantum Monte Carlo simulations, npj Quantum Materials7, 69 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of en- tangled atom arrays, Nature604, 451 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Bourennane, M

    M. Bourennane, M. Eibl, C. Kurtsiefer, S. Gaertner, H. Weinfurter, O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, M. Lewen- stein, and A. Sanpera, Experimental Detection of Mul- tipartite Entanglement using Witness Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 087902 (2004)

    2004

  50. [50]

    Zhang, M.-G

    W.-Y. Zhang, M.-G. He, H. Sun, Y.-G. Zheng, Y. Liu, A. Luo, H.-Y. Wang, Z.-H. Zhu, P.-Y. Qiu, Y.-C. Shen, X.-K. Wang, W. Lin, S.-T. Yu, B.-C. Li, B. Xiao, M.-D. Li, Y.-M. Yang, X. Jiang, H.-N. Dai, Y. Zhou, X. Ma, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Scalable Multipartite Entan- glement Created by Spin Exchange in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 073401 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Beijing PARATERA Tech CO.,Ltd

  52. [52]

    Entanglement architecture of beyond-Landau quantum criticality

    A. W. Sandvik and H. G. Evertz, Loop updates for varia- tional and projector quantum Monte Carlo simulations in the valence-bond basis, Phys. Rev. B82, 024407 (2010). 1 Supplemental Material for "Entanglement architecture of beyond-Landau quantum criticality" I. RDM SAMPLING FOR THE RVB STATE The updating scheme is based on the combined spin- bond basis u...

    2010