Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Unveiling the Role of Solvents in DBTTF:HATCN Ternary Cocrystals

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In solvated DBTTF:HATCN cocrystals, solvent molecules act as the primary electron acceptors, accumulating up to -0.35 e and even reversing HATCN's role to a net donor.

desk verdict Six new cocrystal structures with a careful structural story; the solvent-as-acceptor mechanism is a hypothesis that outruns the present evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09998 v1 pith:V3YNUHAK submitted 2025-09-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Ana M. Valencia , Lisa Schraut-May , Marie Siegert , Sebastian Hammer , Beatrice Cula , Alexandra Friedrich , Holger Helten , Jens Pflaum
show 2 more authors
Caterina Cocchi Andreas Opitz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords chargetransfercocrystalsDBTTFHATCNsolventinclusionRamanspectroscopydensityfunctionaltheoryorganicoptoelectronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether residual solvent molecules trapped in donor-acceptor cocrystals are passive structural guests or active electronic participants. In six new DBTTF:HATCN cocrystals, the authors combine Raman spectroscopy with density-functional theory to show that overall charge transfer stays near 0.11 electrons across all structures, yet the partial-charge analysis reveals that in solvated crystals the solvent, not HATCN, is the main electron acceptor. In the THF-heavy structure, two THF molecules together hold about 0.35 electrons and HATCN actually donates charge. The claim matters because it turns solvent from a processing artifact into a design variable and complicates the standard donor-to-acceptor charge-transfer picture.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on two complementary probes. First, the Raman shift of HATCN's cyano (C≡N) stretching mode is used as a charge-transfer meter, decomposed into a charge-transfer contribution (4.81 cm^-1) and a solvent-dipole contribution (1.06 cm^-1 per Debye), calibrated to about 45 cm^-1 per electron from a reference HATCN anion salt to yield 0.11 e. Second, partial-charge partitioning on the experimental crystal structures assigns net charges to DBTTF, HATCN, and each solvent molecule, revealing where the electrons actually sit and showing that the solvent can become the dominant acceptor.

What would settle it

Compute partial charges for the D:A:THF2 structure with an alternative partitioning method, such as Bader or electrostatic-potential fitting, and check whether THF still accumulates about -0.35 e; alternatively, measure the solvent's core-level binding energy by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and see whether it shifts as expected for negatively charged THF.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that in solvated DBTTF:HATCN cocrystals the solvent molecules actively participate in charge transfer as primary electron acceptors. Raman measurements give a consistent degree of charge transfer of 0.11 e in every polymorph, and density-functional theory on solvent-free structures reproduces that value. But when the solvent is included in the simulation, the picture changes: in D:A:THF2 the two THF molecules accumulate -0.35 e total, DBTTF loses 0.26 e, and HATCN loses 0.09 e, making HATCN a net donor. A similar pattern appears with acetone. The authors conclude that charge distribution in these ternary crystals involves the whole atomic network, not just the cyano

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computational partial-charge scheme correctly assigns electron density between the solvent molecules and the donor-acceptor stack; if that assignment is wrong, the claim that the solvent is the primary electron acceptor fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Solution-grown 1:1 cocrystals preserve the intrinsic donor-acceptor electronic character: band gaps and absorption onsets stay near 1.4-1.5 eV regardless of solvent inclusion.
  • The degree of charge transfer measured by Raman is essentially constant, about 0.11 e, across solvent-free and solvated polymorphs, so the donor-to-acceptor transfer is consistent across processing routes.
  • In solvated crystals, charge can flow to the solvent from both donor and acceptor, so HATCN's role is not fixed; in D:A:THF2 it becomes a net electron donor.
  • The solvent dipole moment shifts the cyano vibration linearly, allowing the polarity effect and the charge-transfer effect to be separated in Raman data.
  • Increasing the number of solvent molecules widens the band gap by roughly 0.1 eV, indicating a subtle but systematic handle for tuning electronic properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If solvents genuinely store significant negative charge, then 'degree of charge transfer' measured from the acceptor's vibrational modes is an incomplete metric: it reports the acceptor's net change, not the destination of the electrons, so doping models for solvent-containing films may need revision.
  • A testable extension would be to vary the solvent's electron affinity, for example by using fluorinated or nitrile-containing analogues of THF and acetone, and watch whether the Raman shift and band gap respond as the solvent becomes a stronger or weaker acceptor.
  • The same reasoning suggests that other 'inert' intercalants, including water or halogenated solvents, might also participate electronically; residual-solvent characterization should become a standard check in donor-acceptor cocrystal studies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports six new DBTTF:HATCN cocrystals: five solvated 1:1 polymorphs grown from THF, acetone, or acetonitrile solution, and one solvent-free 3:2 polymorph grown by horizontal vapor deposition. The authors combine single-crystal X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, optical absorption, and DFT (PBE/PBE0, FHI-aims) to examine how included solvent molecules affect structure, charge transfer, and electronic/optical properties. They find that the optical gap and the main charge-transfer excitations are largely insensitive to solvent inclusion. From the Raman C≡N shift of HATCN, they extract a degree of charge transfer (DCT) of about 0.11 e via a two-part decomposition: a constant DCT-induced shift of 4.81 cm⁻¹ plus a dipole-induced shift linear in the solvent gas-phase dipole moment (Eq. 2). DFT Hirshfeld charges indicate that in solvated structures the solvent molecules carry substantial negative charge, up to -0.35 e total in D:A:THF2, and in D:A:THF2 and D:A:ACE2 HATCN itself becomes a net electron donor. This leads to the central claim that solvent molecules act as primary electron acceptors rather than passive templates, while the overall electronic structure remains robust.

Significance. If the solvent-as-acceptor mechanism is correct, this is a conceptually interesting result that would expand the design space for ternary organic cocrystals. The paper has clear strengths: six new crystal structures with deposited CCDC numbers, transparent experimental methods, a combined experimental/computational workflow, and a public data repository. The Raman and optical data are reported in a reproducible way. However, the headline claim rests on a single population-analysis scheme (Hirshfeld) and on a two-point linear decomposition whose constancy is partly built into the model. These issues are load-bearing because the abstract and conclusions generalize from the Hirshfeld charges to a 'primary electron acceptor' role for solvents. With additional charge-partitioning cross-checks or an experimental probe of the solvent charge state, the claim could become solid; as it stands, it is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 2 and 'Partial charge analysis from DFT'] The central claim that solvents are primary electron acceptors rests entirely on Hirshfeld partial charges from PBE0 calculations on PBE-relaxed experimental geometries. Hirshfeld partitioning is promolecule- and basis-set-dependent, and the short solvent contacts (e.g., d_D:sol = 2.54 Å and d_A:sol = 2.77 Å in D:A:THF2, Table 1) place overlapping densities precisely in the region where the partitioning is most ambiguous. The -0.16/-0.19 e on THF and +0.09 e on HATCN in D:A:THF2 are therefore not robust without a second independent scheme. Please provide Bader, DDEC, Hirshfeld-I, or electrostatic-potential-fitted charges, or an experimental probe (solvent vibrational mode, core-level shift, or transport/conductivity signature). If an alternative partitioning changes the sign or magnitude of the solvent charge, the headline mechanism must be revised.
  2. [Optical Absorption and Electronic Structure (Fig. 5)] The solvent-as-acceptor picture is in tension with the computed electronic structure. The PDOS in Fig. 5 shows THF states only in the deeper valence region, and CT1 is assigned to DBTTF→HATCN transitions. The authors state that DFT 'points to an excess of charge accumulated on the solvent molecule rather than a state-selective charge-transfer,' but Hirshfeld charges do not identify the orbital character of the transferred charge. If THF were truly a primary acceptor with -0.35 e, one would expect acceptor-like states near the frontier; none is shown. This does not disprove the claim, but the paper should explicitly reconcile the PDOS/transition assignment with the large Hirshfeld solvent charges, or soften the 'primary electron acceptor' formulation to 'net electron accumulation according to Hirshfeld partitioning.'
  3. [Vibrational analysis and DCT (Eq. 2)] Equation (2) decomposes the observed C≡N shift as Δν = 4.81 cm⁻¹ + 1.06 cm⁻¹/D·p, with the intercept taken as the DCT-induced shift and the slope fixed by two points (D3:A2 and D:A:MeCN). This assumes (i) the DCT-induced shift is exactly the same for the solvent-free 3:2 polymorph and all solvated 1:1 polymorphs, and (ii) the dipole-induced shift is strictly linear in the gas-phase dipole moment with zero intercept for zero dipole. Neither assumption is tested; the resulting constancy of the inferred DCT (0.11 e) is largely a consequence of the model structure. Please report uncertainties, use more than two data points to determine the dipole slope, and test the linearity assumption (e.g., with a nonpolar solvent or a wider range of dipole moments).
  4. [Raman calibration (Ref. 35 and Fig. 3)] The conversion of the 4.81 cm⁻¹ DCT shift to 0.11 e uses a single literature reference point (≈45 cm⁻¹ per electron from a crystal-violet HATCN anion salt). The raw C≡N shifts vary from 4.8 cm⁻¹ (D3:A2) to 9.0 cm⁻¹ (D:A:MeCN), and the measured values depend on peak fitting and on potential contributions from pristine phases (the authors note pristine DBTTF/HATCN in the MeCN-grown sample). An error estimate on the extracted DCT should be given, and the sensitivity of the result to the choice of reference calibration and to the two-point fit should be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The units in Eq. (2) should be written explicitly: Δν = 4.81 cm⁻¹ + 1.06 cm⁻¹·Debye⁻¹ × p.
  2. [Fig. 3] The dashed red line labeled 'DCT-induced shift' is drawn as a constant; consider labeling it 'constant DCT contribution (4.81 cm⁻¹)' to avoid implying it is a fitted line.
  3. [Experimental Methods] Typo in the diffraction software name: 'CrysAlisP rosoftware' should be 'CrysAlisPro software'.
  4. [Abstract/Conclusions] The phrase 'non-invasive knob' in the conclusions is vague; consider replacing with a more precise description of the tunable structural/electronic parameter.
  5. [Figure 1 caption] The label 'DBTTF:HATCN:soln' in panel (a) is ambiguous; spell out 'THF2' or use the same notation as Table 1.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Raman 'constant DCT' is an intercept of the model, but the central solvent-acceptor claim remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Vibrational analysis and degree of charge transfer', Eqs. (1)-(2) and following paragraph]
    "Inserting in Eq. (1) parameters extracted from Figure 3 leads to ∆ν = 4.81 cm−1 + 1.06 cm−1/Debye p, where the contribution due to D:A interaction is 4.81 cm−1, while 1.06 cm−1 per Debye is given by the slope of the line connecting the results for D3:A2 and D:A:MeCN. ... Based on our experimental evidence, the DCT between DBTTF and HATCN is estimated to be about 0.11e, independent of the polymorph and the solvent used for crystallization."

    The 4.81 cm−1 term is the fitted intercept of a two-point line (D3:A2 at zero dipole and D:A:MeCN), and Eq. (2) then assigns it to the D:A interaction for every structure. The subsequent claim that the DCT is 0.11e 'independent of the polymorph and the solvent' is therefore an input of the decomposition, not an output: the model defines the DCT shift as a constant and then reports that constancy as a finding. The magnitude 0.11e does retain independent content through the external 45 cm−1/e calibration, but the 'consistent across all structures' statement is forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central novel claim—that solvent molecules act as primary electron acceptors in the solvated cocrystals—rests on Hirshfeld partial charges from PBE0 DFT (Table 2). That is not circular: Hirshfeld partitioning is a scheme-dependent computational choice, but the claim is not defined in terms of the conclusion and is not justified by a self-citation. The absence of a Bader/Hirshfeld-I cross-check is a validity weakness, and the paper's own PDOS (Figure 5) showing no solvent frontier states creates tension, but those are support problems, not circularity under the hard rules. There is no load-bearing self-citation: Refs. 43-45 and 56-58 are methodological and do not inject the solvent-acceptor result. The one genuine circularity is in the Raman DCT analysis: Eq. (2) decomposes the measured shift into a constant 'DCT-induced' part and a solvent-dipole part, with the constant taken as the intercept of a line through D3:A2 and D:A:MeCN. Calling the resulting 0.11e 'independent of polymorph and solvent' restates the modeling assumption that the intercept is common to all structures. Because the magnitude is anchored by an external calibration and by solvent-free DFT charges, the circularity is partial rather than total, giving a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. Its load-bearing choices are the external Raman calibration constant, the additive dipole-DCT decomposition, the Hirshfeld partitioning scheme, and the DFT functional/setup. The first two determine the quantitative 0.11 e claim; the third supports the solvent-acceptor mechanism.

free parameters (2)
  • dipole-induced shift slope = 1.06 cm^-1/Debye
    Linear slope of the C≡N shift versus solvent dipole moment, fitted through two data points (D3:A2 at p=0 and D:A:MeCN at p≈3.9 D) in Figure 3; it sets the dipole part of Eq. (2).
  • DCT-induced reference shift = 4.81 cm^-1
    Intercept of the same fit, equal to the measured D3:A2 shift; assumed to be the zero-dipole, pure-DCT shift and used to derive DCT = 0.11 e.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption C≡N stretching frequency in HATCN shifts linearly with molecular charge, with a slope fixed by the 45 cm^-1 shift of the HATCN radical anion in a crystal violet salt (Ref. 35).
    Used in the vibrational analysis section to convert the measured 4.81 cm^-1 shift to 0.11 e; if the slope differs in cocrystal environments, the absolute DCT is scaled accordingly.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed total shift Δν is the sum of a DCT-induced shift and a dipole-induced shift that is linear in the gas-phase dipole moment of the incorporated solvent.
    Equations (1) and (2) in the Vibrational analysis section; this additivity is assumed to separate the two contributions and is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption Hirshfeld atomic populations computed with FHI-aims faithfully partition electron density among DBTTF, HATCN, and solvent fragments, so that the sign and magnitude of molecular partial charges reflect the actual charge redistribution.
    Underpins Table 2 and the central claim that solvents are primary electron acceptors; no alternative population analysis is used.
  • domain assumption PBE-relaxed geometries with fixed experimental lattice parameters and PBE0 single-point electronic structure are adequate to describe frontier bands, gaps, and CT excitations in these molecular cocrystals.
    Standard practice in the field; adopted in Computational Details and used for band structures and RPA spectra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the Role of Solvents in DBTTF:HATCN Ternary Cocrystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V3YNUHAK

@misc{pith2026250909998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the Role of Solvents in DBTTF:HATCN Ternary Cocrystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V3YNUHAK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09998}
}
abstract

Donor-acceptor (D:A) cocrystals offer a promising platform for next-generation optoelectronic applications, but the impact of residual solvent molecules on their properties remains an open question. We investigate six novel D:A cocrystals of dibenzotetrathiafulvalene (DBTTF) and 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaazatriphenylenehexacarbo-nitrile (HATCN), prepared via solvent evaporation, yielding 1:1 molar ratios, and horizontal vapor deposition, resulting in solvent-free 3:2 cocrystals. Combining spectroscopy and density-functional theory (DFT) calculations, we find that, while the electronic and optical properties of the cocrystals are largely unaffected by solvent inclusion, the charge transfer mechanism is surprisingly complex. Raman spectroscopy reveals a consistent charge transfer of 0.11 $e$ across all considered structures, corroborated by DFT calculations on solvent-free systems. Partial charge analysis reveals that in solvated cocrystals, solvent molecules actively participate in the charge transfer process as primary electron acceptors. This involvement can perturb the expected D:A behavior, revealing a faceted charge-transfer mechanism in HATCN even beyond the established involvement of its cyano group. Overall, our study demonstrates that while solution-based methods preserve the intrinsic D:A characteristics, solvents can be leveraged as active electronic components, opening new avenues for material design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09998 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unit cell representations, optical images, and structural details of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Normalized Raman spectra of all D:A cocrystals and their pristine constituents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Raman shifts of the lowest-energy C≡N-mode in the investigated DBTTF:HATCN OCCs, as a function of the dipole moment of the solvent molecules, 36 offset to the value obtained for pristine HATCN. The dashed red line points to the DCT-induced shift, while the violet one indicates the dependence of the solvent polarity. cancelling the total dipole moment acting on the D:A stack. On the other hand, due to the larger dipo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Normalized absorbance measured for all D:A cocrystals and for the pristine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electronic band structure (left) and PDOS (right) of the (a) D:A:THF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Energy levels with respect to the vacuum level set to zero (gray dashed line) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Luminescence in crystalline organic materials: from molecules to molecular solids

    Gierschner, J.; Shi, J.; Mili \'a n-Medina, B.; Roca-Sanju \'a n, D.; Varghese, S.; Park, S. Luminescence in crystalline organic materials: from molecules to molecular solids. Adv.Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2002251, DOI: doi:10.1002/adom.202002251

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202002251 2021

  2. [2]

    Recent advances in organic donor–acceptor cocrystals: design , synthetic approaches , and optical applications

    Liu, H.-Y.; Li, Y.-C.; Wang, X.-D. Recent advances in organic donor–acceptor cocrystals: design , synthetic approaches , and optical applications. CrystEngComm 2023, 25, 3126--3141, DOI: doi:10.1039/D3CE00146F

    work page doi:10.1039/d3ce00146f 2023

  3. [3]

    Toward a comprehensive understanding of molecular doping organic semiconductors (review)

    Salzmann, I.; Heimel, G. Toward a comprehensive understanding of molecular doping organic semiconductors (review). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2015, 204, 208 -- 222, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2015.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2015.05.001 2015

  4. [4]

    Charge-transfer crystallites as molecular electrical dopants

    Méndez, H.; Heimel, G.; Winkler, S.; Frisch, J.; Opitz, A.; Sauer, K.; Wegner, B.; Oehzelt, M.; Röthel, C.; Duhm, S.; Többens, D.; Koch, N.; Salzmann, I. Charge-transfer crystallites as molecular electrical dopants. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8560, DOI: doi:10.1038/ncomms9560

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms9560 2015

  5. [5]

    Crisenza, G. E. M.; Mazzarella, D.; Melchiorre, P. Synthetic Methods Driven by the Photoactivity of Electron Donor–Acceptor Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5461--5476, DOI: doi:10.1021/jacs.0c01416

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.0c01416 2020

  6. [6]

    Thin films of electron donor–acceptor complexes: characterisation of mixed-crystalline phases and implications for electrical doping

    Opitz, A.; Duva, G.; Gebhardt, M.; Kim, H.; Meister, E.; Meisel, T.; Beyer, P.; Belova, V.; Kasper, C.; Pflaum, J.; Pithan, L.; Hinderhofer, A.; Schreiber, F.; Brütting, W. Thin films of electron donor–acceptor complexes: characterisation of mixed-crystalline phases and implications for electrical doping. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 1017--1034, DOI: doi:10.1039/...

    work page doi:10.1039/d1ma00578b 2022

  7. [7]

    P.; Iqbal, H

    Goetz, K. P.; Iqbal, H. F.; Bittle, E. G.; Hacker, C. A.; Pookpanratana, S.; Jurchescu, O. D. Organic single crystals of charge-transfer complexes: model systems for the study of donor/acceptor interactions. Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 271--280, DOI: doi:10.1039/D1MH01214B

    work page doi:10.1039/d1mh01214b 2022

  8. [8]

    K.; McClellan, J

    Ourgessa, M. K.; McClellan, J. R.; Johnston, D. H.; Mauck, C. M. Molecular p-Doping in Thiophene Diketopyrrolopyrrole Thin Films through Formation of a Charge Transfer Complex. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 18694--18705, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03912

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03912 2023

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    G.; Vanossi, D.; Fontanesi, C.; Girlando, A.; Brillante, A.; Da Como, E

    Salzillo, T.; Masino, M.; Kociok-K \"o hn, G.; Di Nuzzo, D.; Venuti, E.; Della Valle, R. G.; Vanossi, D.; Fontanesi, C.; Girlando, A.; Brillante, A.; Da Como, E. Structure, Stoichiometry, and Charge Transfer in Cocrystals of Perylene with TCNQ-Fx. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, ...

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Impact of Stoichiometry and Fluorine Atoms on the Charge Transport of Perylene–F4TCNQ

    Wang, Y.; Zheng, C.; Hao, W.; Zhao, H.; Li, S.; Shen, L.; Zhu, J.; Di, C.-A. Impact of Stoichiometry and Fluorine Atoms on the Charge Transport of Perylene–F4TCNQ. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3376--3380, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01299

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Precisely Tailoring the Stoichiometric Stacking of Perylene-TCNQ Co-Crystals towards Different Nano and Microstructures with Varied Optoelectronic Performances

    Zhu, W.; Yi, Y.; Zhen, Y.; Hu, W. Precisely Tailoring the Stoichiometric Stacking of Perylene-TCNQ Co-Crystals towards Different Nano and Microstructures with Varied Optoelectronic Performances. Small 2015, 11, 2150--2156, DOI: doi:10.1002/smll.201402330

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    A Large Variety of Crystal Structures and Conducting Properties in Dimethylbenzoimidazolium Salts of Tetracyanoquinodimethanes

    Suzuki, K.; Kiyota, Y.; Yoo, D.; Uekusa, T.; Kawamoto, T.; Mori, T. A Large Variety of Crystal Structures and Conducting Properties in Dimethylbenzoimidazolium Salts of Tetracyanoquinodimethanes. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 5940--5946, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00624

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Molecular insertion regulates the donor-acceptor interactions in cocrystals for the design of piezochromic luminescent materials

    Zhai, C.; Yin, X.; Niu, S.; Yao, M.; Hu, S.; Dong, J.; Shang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, Q.; Sundqvist, B.; Liu, B. Molecular insertion regulates the donor-acceptor interactions in cocrystals for the design of piezochromic luminescent materials. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2041--1723, DOI: ...

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Stimuli-responsive behaviors of organic charge transfer cocrystals: recent advances and perspectives

    Sun, L.; Yang, F.; Zhang, X.; Hu, W. Stimuli-responsive behaviors of organic charge transfer cocrystals: recent advances and perspectives. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 715--728, DOI: doi:10.1039/C9QM00760A

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Brillante, A. et al. The four polymorphic modifications of the semiconductor dibenzo-tetrathiafulvalene. CrystEngComm 2008, 10, 1899--1909, DOI: doi:10.1039/B810993A

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    Kanakarajan, K.; Czarnik, A. W. Synthesis and some reactions of hexaazatriphenylenehexanitrile, a hydrogen-free polyfunctional heterocycle with D3h symmetry. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 5241--5243, DOI: doi:10.1021/jo00376a036

    1986 doi

  9. [17]

    oker, B.; Hofmann, O. T.; Rangger, G. M.; Frank, P.; Blum, R.-P.; Rieger, R.; Venema, L.; Vollmer, A.; M\

    Br\"oker, B.; Hofmann, O. T.; Rangger, G. M.; Frank, P.; Blum, R.-P.; Rieger, R.; Venema, L.; Vollmer, A.; M\"ullen, K.; Rabe, J. P.; Winkler, A.; Rudolf, P.; Zojer, E.; Koch, N. Density-Dependent Reorientation and Rehybridization of Chemisorbed Conjugated Molecules for Contro...

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    R.; Francis, A

    Gallegos, J. R.; Francis, A. H.; Ockwig, N. W.; Rasmussen, P. G.; Raptis, R. G.; Challen, P. R.; Ouedraogo, I. The spectroelectrochemical, magnetic, and structural characterization of reduced hexaazatriphenylenehexacarbonitrile, HAT(CN) _6 . Synth. Met. 2009, 159, 1667--1671, ...

    2009 doi

  11. [19]

    T.; Schottel, B

    Chifotides, H. T.; Schottel, B. L.; Dunbar, K. R. The -Accepting Arene HAT(CN)6 as a Halide Receptor through Charge Transfer: Multisite Anion Interactions and Self-Assembly in Solution and the Solid State. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7202--7207, DOI: doi:10.1002/anie.201001755

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    T.; Decurtins, S.; Veciana, J.; Rovira, C.; Mas-Torrent, M.; Liu, S.-X

    Geng, Y.; Pfattner, R.; Campos, A.; Wang, W.; Jeannin, O.; Hauser, J.; Puigdollers, J.; Bromley, S. T.; Decurtins, S.; Veciana, J.; Rovira, C.; Mas-Torrent, M.; Liu, S.-X. HOMO Stabilisation in -Extended Dibenzotetrathiafulvalene Derivatives for Their Application in Organic Fi...

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    Theoretical study on charge carrier mobilities of tetrathiafulvalene derivatives

    Li, H.-x.; Zheng, R.-h.; Shi, Q. Theoretical study on charge carrier mobilities of tetrathiafulvalene derivatives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 5642--5650, DOI: doi:10.1039/C0CP01016B

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    State-of-Matter-Dependent Charge-Transfer Interactions between Planar Molecules for Doping Applications

    Beyer, P.; Pham, D.; Peter, C.; Koch, N.; Meister, E.; Br \"u tting, W.; Grubert, L.; Hecht, S.; Nabok, D.; Cocchi, C.; Draxl, C.; Opitz, A. State-of-Matter-Dependent Charge-Transfer Interactions between Planar Molecules for Doping Applications. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 1237--12...

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Energy level alignment at a charge generation interface between 4,4´-bis(N-phenyl-1-naphthylamino)biphenyl and 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaazatriphenylene-hexacarbonitrile

    Kim, Y.-K.; Won Kim, J.; Park, Y. Energy level alignment at a charge generation interface between 4,4´-bis(N-phenyl-1-naphthylamino)biphenyl and 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaazatriphenylene-hexacarbonitrile. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 063305, DOI: doi:10.1063/1.3081409

    2009 doi

  16. [24]

    H.; Yoo, S.-J.; Kim, T

    Lee, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, K. H.; Yoo, S.-J.; Kim, T. G.; Kim, J. W.; Kim, J.-J. Determination of the interface energy level alignment of a doped organic hetero-junction using capacitance–voltage measurements. Organic Electronics 2012, 13, 2346--2351, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2...

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    S.; Bloch, A

    Chappell, J. S.; Bloch, A. N.; Bryden, W. A.; Maxfield, M.; Poehler, T. O.; Cowan, D. O. Degree of charge transfer in organic conductors by infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2442--2443, DOI: doi:10.1021/ja00399a066

    1981 doi

  18. [26]

    Degree of Charge Transfer in Donor–Acceptor Systems of the - Type

    Kampar, E.; Neilands, O. Degree of Charge Transfer in Donor–Acceptor Systems of the - Type. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1986, 55, 334, DOI: doi:10.1070/RC1986v055n04ABEH003193

    1986 doi

  19. [27]

    VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data

    Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data . J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 44, 1272--1276, DOI: doi:10.1107/S0021889811038970

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    B.; Oonk, H

    Haget, Y.; Chanh, N. B.; Oonk, H. A. J.; Cuevas-Diarte, M. \`A . In Molecular Mixed Crystals; Cuevas-Diarte, M. \`A ., Oonk, H. A. J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 9--26, DOI: doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68727-4_2

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    K.; Banerjee, S.; Gonnade, R

    Ghosh, M.; Sikder, A. K.; Banerjee, S.; Gonnade, R. G. Studies on CL-20/HMX (2:1) Cocrystal: A New Preparation Method and Structural and Thermokinetic Analysis. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 3781--3793, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00015

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    The kinetics of growth from solution

    Brice, J. The kinetics of growth from solution. J. Cryst. Growth 1967, 1, 218--224, DOI: doi:10.1016/0022-0248(67)90056-5

    1967 doi

  23. [31]

    The role of the solvent in crystal growth from solution

    Davey, R. The role of the solvent in crystal growth from solution. J. Cryst. Growth 1986, 76, 637--644, DOI: doi:10.1016/0022-0248(86)90180-6

    1986 doi

  24. [32]

    Vibrational spectroscopy of mixed stack organic semiconductors: comparison with segregated stack systems

    Girlando, A.; Pecile, C.; Painelli, A. Vibrational spectroscopy of mixed stack organic semiconductors: comparison with segregated stack systems . J. Phys. Colloques 1983, 44, C3--1547--C3--1550, DOI: doi:10.1051/jphyscol/1983060

    1983

  25. [33]

    Raman spectra of radical ion DBTTF complexes; relation between raman frequency and formal charge

    Tanaka, M.; Shimizu, M.; Saito, Y.; Tanaka, J. Raman spectra of radical ion DBTTF complexes; relation between raman frequency and formal charge . Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 125, 594--596, DOI: doi:10.1016/0009-2614(86)87106-8

    1986 doi

  26. [34]

    V.; Khasanov, S

    Konarev, D. V.; Khasanov, S. S.; Kuzmin, A. V.; Mikhailenko, M. V.; Otsuka, A.; Yamochi, H.; Kitagawa, H.; Lyubovskaya, R. N. Solid-State Properties of Hexaazatriphenylenehexacarbonitrile HAT(CN) _6^ - Radical Anions in Crystalline Salts Containing Cryptand(M ^+ ) and Crystal ...

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    D.; Lide, D

    Nelson, R. D.; Lide, D. R.; Maryott, A. A. Selected values of electric dipole moments for molecules in the gas phase:. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 1967, DOI: doi:10.6028/NBS.NSRDS.10

    1967 doi

  28. [36]

    Electron-Intramolecular Phonon Coupling in regular and Dimerized Mixed Stack Organic Semiconductors

    Girlando, A.; Painelli, A.; Pecile, C. Electron-Intramolecular Phonon Coupling in regular and Dimerized Mixed Stack Organic Semiconductors . Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2007, 120, 17--26, DOI: doi:10.1080/00268948508075754

    2007 doi

  29. [37]

    P.; Tsutsumi, J.; Pookpanratana, S.; Chen, J.; Corbin, N

    Goetz, K. P.; Tsutsumi, J.; Pookpanratana, S.; Chen, J.; Corbin, N. S.; Behera, R. K.; Coropceanu, V.; Richter, C. A.; Hacker, C. A.; Hasegawa, T.; Jurchescu, O. D. Reply to Comment on Polymorphism in the 1:1 Charge-Transfer Complex DBTTF-TCNQ and Its Effects on Optical and El...

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Hirshfeld, F. L. Bonded-Atom Fragments for Describing Molecular Charge Densities. Theor. Chem. Acta 1977, 44, 129--138, DOI: doi:10.1007/BF00549096

    1977 doi

  31. [39]

    Goris, L.; Haenen, K.; Nesl \' a dek, M.; Wagner, P.; Vanderzande, D.; De Schepper , L.; D'haen, J.; Lutsen, L.; Manca, J. V. Absorption phenomena in organic thin films for solar cell applications investigated by photothermal deflection spectroscopy . J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, ...

    2005 doi

  32. [40]

    Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Impact of Dopant Strength and Electronic Coupling

    M\' e ndez, H.; Heimel, G.; Opitz, A.; Sauer, K.; Barkowski, P.; Oehzelt, M.; Soeda, J.; Okamoto, T.; Takeya, J.; Arlin, J.-B.; Balandier, J.-Y.; Geerts, Y.; Koch, N.; Salzmann, I. Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Impact of Dopant Strength and Electronic Coupling. Angew. Chem...

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    M.; Cocchi, C

    Valencia, A. M.; Cocchi, C. Electronic and Optical Properties of Oligothiophene-F4TCNQ Charge-Transfer Complexes: The Role of the Donor Conjugation Length. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 9617--9623, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01390

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Optical spectra from molecules to crystals: Insight from many-body perturbation theory

    Cocchi, C.; Draxl, C. Optical spectra from molecules to crystals: Insight from many-body perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 205126, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.205126

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    T.; Valencia, A

    Cocchi, C.; Guerrini, M.; Krumland, J.; Nguyen, N. T.; Valencia, A. M. Modeling the electronic structure of organic materials: a solid-state physicist’s perspective. J. Phys. Mater. 2022, 6, 012001, DOI: doi:10.1088/2515-7639/aca935

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Physical vapor growth of organic semiconductors

    Laudise, R.; Kloc, C.; Simpkins, P.; Siegrist, T. Physical vapor growth of organic semiconductors. J. Cryst. Growth 1998, 187, 449--454, DOI: doi:10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00034-7

    1998 doi

  37. [45]

    Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT -- Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination . Acta Crystallogr. A 2015, 71, 3--8, DOI: doi:10.1107/S2053273314026370

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL . Acta Crystallogr. C 2015, 71, 3--8, DOI: doi:10.1107/S2053229614024218

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    B.; Sheldrick, G

    H \" u bschle, C. B.; Sheldrick, G. M.; Dittrich, B. ShelXle : a Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL . J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 44, 1281--1284, DOI: doi:10.1107/S0021889811043202

    2011 doi

  40. [48]

    Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS. 1996; University of G\"ottingen, Germany, Standard Software References

    1996

  41. [49]

    Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals

    Blum, V.; Gehrke, R.; Hanke, F.; Havu, P.; Havu, V.; Ren, X.; Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 2175--2196, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022

    2009 doi

  42. [50]

    Efficient O(N) integration for all-electron electronic structure calculation using numeric basis functions

    Havu, V.; Blum, V.; Havu, P.; Scheffler, M. Efficient O(N) integration for all-electron electronic structure calculation using numeric basis functions. J. Comp. Phys. 2009, 228, 8367--8379, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008

    2009 doi

  43. [51]

    High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools

    Setyawan, W.; Curtarolo, S. High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools. Comp. Mater. Sci. 2010, 49, 299--312, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865--3868, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  45. [53]

    P.; Ernzerhof, M.; Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P.; Ernzerhof, M.; Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9982--9985, DOI: doi:10.1063/1.472933

    1996 doi

  46. [54]

    aim ^2 dat

    Saßnick, H.-D.; Edzards, J.; Reents, T.; Santana-Andreo, J.; Cocchi, C. aim ^2 dat. https://github.com/aim2dat/aim2dat, 2025; Accessed: 2025-08-22

    2025

  47. [55]

    G.; Valencia, A

    Edzards, J.; Sa nick, H.-D.; Buzanich, A. G.; Valencia, A. M.; Emmerling, F.; Beyer, S.; Cocchi, C. Effects of Ligand Substituents on the Character of Zn-Coordination in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 21456--21464, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c06054

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    r Dk! h=OHݕg ϷjXPԖli zv 8o ? 1m

    Saßnick, H.-D.; Machado Ferreira De Araujo, F.; Edzards, J.; Cocchi, C. Impact of Ligand Substitution and Metal Node Exchange in the Electronic Properties of Scandium Terephthalate Frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 2098--2108, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03945 mcitethebi...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.