pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.12571 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.soft

Anomalous statistics in the Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity: from Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion to anomalous diffusion and ergodicity breaking

Takuma Akimoto , Jae-Hyung Jeon , Ralf Metzler , Tomoshige Miyaguchi , Takashi Uneyama , Eiji Yamamoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft
keywords Langevin equationfluctuating diffusivityBrownian yet non-Gaussian diffusionanomalous diffusionergodicity breakingheterogeneous mediasubdiffusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity accounts for both Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion and a range of anomalous transport phenomena including subdiffusion and weak ergodicity breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review centers on the Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity as a model for particle motion in heterogeneous media. By letting the diffusion coefficient itself follow a stochastic process, the equation produces a linear mean-square displacement paired with non-Gaussian displacement distributions, reproducing the commonly observed Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion. The same setup further generates anomalous diffusion, ageing, and weak ergodicity breaking in which time averages differ from ensemble averages and vary from one trajectory to another. A sympathetic reader cares because the framework offers a single, minimal mechanism that connects these deviations from classical Brownian motion without separate explanations for each effect.

Core claim

The Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity captures essential features of diffusion in heterogeneous media by treating the diffusivity itself as a stochastic process. This leads to Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion, characterized by linear mean-square displacement but non-Gaussian displacement distributions. It also encompasses anomalous diffusion, ageing phenomena, and weak ergodicity breaking, where time averages do not match ensemble averages and show trajectory variability.

What carries the argument

The Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity (LEFD), in which the diffusion coefficient evolves as its own stochastic process. It carries the argument by introducing temporal heterogeneity in mobility that produces non-Gaussian statistics while preserving linear mean-square displacement and extends naturally to anomalous regimes.

If this is right

  • Time-averaged mean-square displacements can differ from ensemble averages, producing weak ergodicity breaking.
  • Subdiffusive or superdiffusive scaling emerges depending on the correlation time and distribution of the diffusivity fluctuations.
  • Ageing appears when the observation window affects the measured transport exponents.
  • The model accounts for experimental observations in molecular transport and biological systems through diffusivity heterogeneity alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Heterogeneity in the physical environment can often be summarized by effective diffusivity fluctuations, so experiments that tune environmental variability independently could isolate this effect.
  • Comparing LEFD predictions directly to data from crowded or porous media would test whether additional spatial correlations are required.
  • Trajectory-to-trajectory variability in time averages offers a practical observable for single-particle experiments to quantify ergodicity breaking.

Load-bearing premise

Modeling diffusivity fluctuations as a stochastic process is sufficient to reproduce the key statistical features of diffusion in heterogeneous media.

What would settle it

Single-particle tracking data from a well-characterized heterogeneous medium that shows strictly Gaussian displacements at all times despite linear mean-square displacement and no detectable diffusivity fluctuations would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.12571 by Eiji Yamamoto, Jae-Hyung Jeon, Ralf Metzler, Takashi Uneyama, Takuma Akimoto, Tomoshige Miyaguchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Statistical signatures of fluctuating diffusivity in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Coarse-graining pathways for deriving the LEFD from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic illustration of the reptation model. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. RSD of the reptation model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. A typical trajectory of a single tagged particle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic illustration of a binary gas mixture and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Squared RSD of the TSDs—equivalent to the EB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Mean squared displacement of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Extreme MFPT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. DC-SIGN diffusion reveals weak ergodicity break [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Temporal fluctuations of the local diffusivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Heterogeneous superdiffusion of intracellular par [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Diffusion in heterogeneous media. (A) Snapshot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Diffusive motion is a fundamental transport mechanism in physical and biological systems, governing dynamics across a wide range of scales -- from molecular transport to animal foraging. In many complex systems, however, diffusion deviates from classical Brownian behaviour, exhibiting striking phenomena such as Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion (BYNGD) and anomalous diffusion. BYNGD describes a frequently observed statistical feature characterised by the coexistence of linear mean-square displacement (MSD) and non-Gaussian displacement distributions. Anomalous diffusion, in contrast, involves a nonlinear time dependence of the MSD and often reflects mechanisms such as trapping, viscoelasticity, heterogeneity, or active processes. Both phenomena challenge the conventional framework based on constant diffusivity and Gaussian statistics. This review focuses the theoretical modelling of such behaviour via the Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity (LEFD) -- a flexible stochastic framework that captures essential features of diffusion in heterogeneous media. LEFD not only accounts for BYNGD but also naturally encompasses a wide range of anomalous transport phenomena, including subdiffusion, ageing, and weak ergodicity breaking. Ergodicity is discussed in terms of the correspondence between time and ensemble averages, as well as the trajectory-to-trajectory variability of time-averaged observables. The review further highlights the empirical relevance of LEFD and related models in explaining diverse experimental observations and underscores their value to uncovering the physical mechanisms governing transport in complex systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review article examines the Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity (LEFD) as a modeling framework for diffusion in heterogeneous media. It covers how LEFD reproduces Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion (BYNGD) via linear MSD with non-Gaussian PDFs, and extends to anomalous diffusion features including subdiffusion, ageing, and weak ergodicity breaking, while discussing time-ensemble average correspondence and trajectory variability, along with empirical applications.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the review would usefully consolidate how a single stochastic framework with fluctuating D(t) can address multiple deviations from classical Brownian motion, providing a reference for interpreting single-particle tracking data in complex systems. The discussion of ergodicity breaking and its experimental signatures adds value for connecting theory to observations in statistical mechanics and biophysics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1 (Introduction): The assertion that LEFD 'naturally encompasses' subdiffusion, ageing, and weak ergodicity breaking in addition to BYNGD risks overstating generality. While any stationary fluctuating D(t) with finite variance and correlation time yields BYNGD with linear MSD, subdiffusion and ageing require specific long-time power-law correlations or trapping couplings in the diffusivity process; these are additional model choices rather than automatic consequences of fluctuating diffusivity alone. The review should explicitly map the minimal conditions on the D-process for each phenomenon (e.g., via the correlation function or stationary distribution of D) to support the central unifying claim.
  2. [§3] §3 (Anomalous diffusion and LEFD): The derivations or examples showing subdiffusive MSD or ageing should be checked for whether they rely on ad-hoc choices for the diffusivity stochastic process (e.g., specific Ornstein-Uhlenbeck parameters or power-law kernels) rather than emerging generically. If the manuscript presents these as direct outcomes of the minimal LEFD equations without further specification, this needs clarification to avoid circularity with the skeptic's concern.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Ensure consistent notation for the diffusivity process D(t) across sections; for instance, clarify whether D(t) is assumed Markovian or has explicit memory in the ageing discussion.
  2. [Discussion] Add a brief table or summary section comparing the correlation properties of D(t) needed for BYNGD versus subdiffusion to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive reading of our review. The comments highlight important points about precision in describing the scope of the LEFD framework, and we have revised the manuscript to address them directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1 (Introduction): The assertion that LEFD 'naturally encompasses' subdiffusion, ageing, and weak ergodicity breaking in addition to BYNGD risks overstating generality. While any stationary fluctuating D(t) with finite variance and correlation time yields BYNGD with linear MSD, subdiffusion and ageing require specific long-time power-law correlations or trapping couplings in the diffusivity process; these are additional model choices rather than automatic consequences of fluctuating diffusivity alone. The review should explicitly map the minimal conditions on the D-process for each phenomenon (e.g., via the correlation function or stationary distribution of D) to support the central unifying claim.

    Authors: We agree that the original wording in the abstract and §1 could be read as overstating the automatic nature of these features. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract and introduction to state that LEFD provides a unifying stochastic framework capable of reproducing these phenomena when the diffusivity process satisfies appropriate additional conditions. We have inserted a new paragraph in §1 that explicitly maps the minimal requirements: stationary D(t) with finite variance and finite correlation time for BYNGD; power-law or long-range correlations (or explicit trapping coupling) in the D-process for subdiffusion and ageing; and persistent memory in D(t) for weak ergodicity breaking. These conditions are illustrated with the corresponding correlation functions and stationary distributions, supported by the derivations already present in the review. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Anomalous diffusion and LEFD): The derivations or examples showing subdiffusive MSD or ageing should be checked for whether they rely on ad-hoc choices for the diffusivity stochastic process (e.g., specific Ornstein-Uhlenbeck parameters or power-law kernels) rather than emerging generically. If the manuscript presents these as direct outcomes of the minimal LEFD equations without further specification, this needs clarification to avoid circularity with the skeptic's concern.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the subdiffusive and ageing examples in §3 are obtained only after specifying particular forms for the fluctuating diffusivity (power-law kernels, non-stationary increments, or coupling to a trapping process). We have revised the opening and closing paragraphs of §3 to state explicitly that these behaviors do not follow from the minimal LEFD equations alone but require additional structure on the D-process. To remove any appearance of circularity we have added a compact summary table that lists, for each phenomenon, the necessary properties of the diffusivity process (correlation function, stationarity, etc.). This table distinguishes the generic BYNGD case from the more specialized anomalous cases and cross-references the relevant sections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review summarizes external literature on LEFD without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper that presents the Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity (LEFD) as a framework drawn from prior stochastic process literature. The abstract and structure indicate it accounts for BYNGD and anomalous phenomena by referencing established models rather than deriving new results from within the manuscript itself. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes introduced here; claims about encompassing subdiffusion, ageing, and ergodicity breaking are attributed to the flexibility of the LEFD setup as previously developed. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review builds on standard assumptions in stochastic differential equations and diffusion theory from prior literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Diffusivity fluctuates over time according to a stochastic process in heterogeneous media
    This is the core modeling choice enabling LEFD to reproduce BYNGD and anomalous behaviors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1237 out tokens · 51381 ms · 2026-05-18T17:03:20.726288+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Observation-Time-Induced Crossover from Fluctuating Diffusivity

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fluctuating diffusivity in a Langevin framework produces an observation-time-induced crossover in effective diffusion coefficient whose temperature location shifts systematically with measurement duration.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

271 extracted references · 271 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bouchaud and A

    J. Bouchaud and A. Georges, Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications, Phys. Rep. 195, 127 (1990)

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter, The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Goychuk, Viscoelastic subdiffusion: From anomalous to normal, Phys

    I. Goychuk, Viscoelastic subdiffusion: From anomalous to normal, Phys. Rev. E 80, 046125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Livi and P

    R. Livi and P. Politi, Nonequilibrium statistical physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 1992)

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    R. Brown, A brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies, Phil. Mag. 4, 161 (1828)

    work page

  7. [7]

    Einstein, Über die von der molekularkinetischen The- orie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Ann

    A. Einstein, Über die von der molekularkinetischen The- orie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Ann. Phys. 322, 549 (1905)

    work page 1905

  8. [8]

    Smoluchowski, Zur kinetischen theorie der Brown- schen molekular bewegung und der suspensionen, Ann

    M. Smoluchowski, Zur kinetischen theorie der Brown- schen molekular bewegung und der suspensionen, Ann. d. Phys. 21, 756 (1906)

    work page 1906

  9. [9]

    J. B. Perrin, L’agitation moléculaire et le mouvement brownien, Compt. Rend. 146, 967 (1908)

    work page 1908

  10. [10]

    Fick, Ueber diffusion [on diffusion], Ann

    A. Fick, Ueber diffusion [on diffusion], Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 170, 59 (1855)

    work page

  11. [11]

    Fourier, Théorie analytique de la chaleur [The ana- lytical theory of heat] (Didot, Paris, 1822)

    J. Fourier, Théorie analytique de la chaleur [The ana- lytical theory of heat] (Didot, Paris, 1822)

    work page

  12. [12]

    G. G. Stokes, On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Trans. 9, 8 (1851)

    work page

  13. [13]

    R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical physics II: nonequilibrium statistical mechanics , Vol. 31 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Brenig, Statistical theory of heat: Nonequilibrium phenomena (Springer, Heidelberg, 1990)

    W. Brenig, Statistical theory of heat: Nonequilibrium phenomena (Springer, Heidelberg, 1990)

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Langevin, Sur la théorie de movement brownien, C.R

    P. Langevin, Sur la théorie de movement brownien, C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 146, 530 (1908)

    work page 1908

  16. [16]

    W. T. Coffey and Y. P. Kalmykov, The Langevin equa- tion (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    H. B. Callen and T. A. Welton, Irreversibility and gen- eralized noise, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951)

    work page 1951

  18. [18]

    Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversib le processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversib le processes. i. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. J. 12, 570 (1957)

    work page 1957

  19. [19]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966)

    work page 1966

  20. [20]

    Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation (Springer, Hei- delberg, 1999)

    H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation (Springer, Hei- delberg, 1999)

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    B. D. Hughes, Random walks and random environments, Volume 1: Random walks (Oxford Science Publishers, Oxford, UK, 1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    Klafter and I

    J. Klafter and I. M. Sokolov, First steps in random walks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Y. G. E. Barkai and R. Metzler, Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells, Phys. Today 65(8), 29 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Metzler, J.-H

    R. Metzler, J.-H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non- stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Scher and E

    H. Scher and E. W. Montroll, Anomalous transit-time dispersion in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2455 (1975)

    work page 1975

  26. [26]

    B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. van Ness, Fractional Brow- nian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968)

    work page 1968

  27. [27]

    T. H. Solomon, E. R. Weeks, and H. L. Swinney, Ob- servation of anomalous diffusion and Lévy flights in a two-dimensional rotating flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3975 (1993)

    work page 1993

  28. [28]

    I. Y. Wong, M. L. Gardel, D. R. Reichman, E. R. Weeks, M. T. Valentine, A. R. Bausch, and D. A. Weitz, Anomalous diffusion probes microstructure dynamics of entangled f-actin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 178101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, E.-L. Munteanu, G. Thon, L. Oddershede, and K. Berg-Sorensen, Anomalous dif- fusion in living yeast cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 078102 (2004)

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    D. S. Banks and C. Fradin, Anomalous diffusion of pro- teins due to molecular crowding, Biophys. Journal. 89, 2960 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Golding and E

    I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Physcial nature of bacterial cytoplasm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006). 45

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Szymanski and M

    J. Szymanski and M. Weiss, Elucidating the origin of anomalous diffusion in crowded fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 038102 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    S. C. Weber, A. J. Spakowitz, and J. A. Theriot, Bac- terial chromosomal loci move subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 238102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Weigel, B

    A. Weigel, B. Simon, M. Tamkun, and D. Krapf, Er- godic and nonergodic processes coexist in the plasma membrane as observed by single-molecule tracking, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6438 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    J.-H. Jeon, V. Tejedor, S. Burov, E. Barkai, C. Selhuber - Unkel, K. Berg-Sørensen, L. Oddershede, and R. Met- zler, In vivo anomalous diffusion and weak ergodicity breaking of lipid granules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048103 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    M. J. Skaug, J. Mabry, and D. K. Schwartz, Intermittent molecular hopping at the solid-liquid interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 256101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    S. A. Tabei, S. Burov, H. Y. Kim, A. Kuznetsov, T. Huynh, J. Jureller, L. H. Philipson, A. R. Dinner, and N. F. Scherer, Intracellular transport of insulin granules is a subordinated random walk, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4911 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    G. M. Akselrod, P. B. Deotare, N. J. Thompson, J. Lee, W. A. Tisdale, M. A. Baldo, V. M. Menon, and V. Bulović, Visualization of exciton transport in ordered and disordered molecular solids, Nat. Commun. 5, 3646 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Manzo, J

    C. Manzo, J. A. Torreno-Pina, P. Massignan, G. J. Lapeyre Jr, M. Lewenstein, and M. F. G. Parajo, Weak ergodicity breaking of receptor motion in living cells stemming from random diffusivity, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011021 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Rajyaguru, R

    A. Rajyaguru, R. Metzler, I. Dror, D. Grolimund, and B. Berkowitz, Diffusion in porous rock is anomalous, Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 8946 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Rajyaguru, R

    A. Rajyaguru, R. Metzler, A. G. Cherstvy, and B. Berkowitz, Quantifying anomalous chemical diffusion through disordered porous rock materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 9056 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Geisel and S

    T. Geisel and S. Thomae, Anomalous diffusion in in- termittent chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1936 (1984)

    work page 1936

  43. [43]

    Ishizaki, T

    R. Ishizaki, T. Horita, T. Kobayashi, and H. Mori, Anomalous diffusion due to accelerator modes in the standard map, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 1013 (1991)

    work page 1991

  44. [44]

    Dräger and J

    J. Dräger and J. Klafter, Strong anomaly in diffusion generated by iterated maps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5998 (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Barkai, Aging in subdiffusion generated by a deter- ministic dynamical system, Phys

    E. Barkai, Aging in subdiffusion generated by a deter- ministic dynamical system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 104101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    Akimoto and T

    T. Akimoto and T. Miyaguchi, Role of infinite invariant measure in deterministic subdiffusion, Phys. Rev. E 82, 030102(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Akimoto, Distributional response to biases in deter - ministic superdiffusion, Phys

    T. Akimoto, Distributional response to biases in deter - ministic superdiffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 164101 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Sato and R

    Y. Sato and R. Klages, Anomalous diffusion in ran- dom dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 174101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Müller-Plathe, S

    F. Müller-Plathe, S. C. Rogers, and W. F. van Gun- steren, Computational evidence for anomalous diffusion of small molecules in amorphous polymers, Chem. Phys. Lett. 199, 237 (1992)

    work page 1992

  50. [50]

    Neusius, I

    T. Neusius, I. Daidone, I. M. Sokolov, and J. C. Smith, Subdiffusion in peptides orginates from the fractal-like structure of configuration space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 188103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Akimoto, E

    T. Akimoto, E. Yamamoto, K. Yasuoka, Y. Hirano, and M. Yasui, Non-Gaussian fluctuations resulting from power-law trapping in a lipid bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 178103 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    J.-H. Jeon, H. M.-S. Monne, M. Javanainen, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diffusion of phospholipids and cholesterols in a lipid bilayer and its origins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 188103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Yamamoto, T

    E. Yamamoto, T. Akimoto, M. Yasui, and K. Yasuoka, Origin of subdiffusion of water molecules on cell mem- brane surfaces, Sci. Rep. 4, 4720 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    J.-H. Jeon, M. Javanainen, H. Martinez-Seara, R. Met- zler, and I. Vattulainen, Protein crowding in lipid bi- layers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral dif- fusion of phospholipids and proteins, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    X. Hu, L. Hong, M. D. Smith, T. Neusius, and J. C. Smith, The dynamics of single protein molecules is non- equilibrium and self-similar over thirteen decades in time, Nature Phys. 12, 171 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    M. V. Tamm, L. I. Nazarov, A. A. Gavrilov, and A. V. Chertovich, Anomalous diffusion in fractal globules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 178102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    Klafter and I

    J. Klafter and I. M. Sokolov, Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings, Phys. world 18, 29 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    B. Wang, S. M. Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Anomalous yet Brownian, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 15160 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, When Brownian diffusion is not Gaussian, Nat. Mater. 11, 481 (2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    K. He, F. Babaye Khorasani, S. T. Retterer, D. K. Thomas, J. C. Conrad, and R. Krishnamoorti, Diffu- sive dynamics of nanoparticles in arrays of nanoposts, ACS Nano 7, 5122 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Bhattacharya, D

    S. Bhattacharya, D. K. Sharma, S. Saurabh, S. De, A. Sain, A. Nandi, and A. Chowdhury, Plasticization of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) thin films under ambient hu- midity: Insight from single-molecule tracer diffusion dy- namics, J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 7771 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    J. Guan, B. Wang, and S. Granick, Even hard-sphere colloidal suspensions display Fickian yet non-Gaussian diffusion, ACS Nano 8, 3331 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    G. Kwon, B. J. Sung, and A. Yethiraj, Dynamics in crowded environments: is non-Gaussian Brownian dif- fusion normal?, J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 8128 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Diffusing diffusiv- ity: A model for anomalous, yet Brownian, diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 098302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Jain and K

    R. Jain and K. L. Sebastian, Diffusion in a crowded, rearranging environment, J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 3988 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion: From superstatis- tics to subordination of diffusing diffusivities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Tyagi and B

    N. Tyagi and B. J. Cherayil, Non-Gaussian Brownian diffusion in dynamically disordered thermal environ- 46 ments, J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 7204 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Sposini, A

    V. Sposini, A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, G. Pagnini, and R. Metzler, Random diffusivity from stochastic equa- tions: comparison of two models for Brownian yet non- Gaussian diffusion, New J. Phys. 20, 043044 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    J. M. Miotto, S. Pigolotti, A. V. Chechkin, and S. Roldán-Vargas, Length scales in Brownian yet non- Gaussian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Rusciano, R

    F. Rusciano, R. Pastore, and F. Greco, Fickian non- Gaussian diffusion in glass-forming liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 168001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Alexandre, M

    A. Alexandre, M. Lavaud, N. Fares, E. Millan, Y. Louyer, T. Salez, Y. Amarouchene, T. Guérin, and D. S. Dean, Non-Gaussian diffusion near surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 077101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Sposini, C

    V. Sposini, C. N. Likos, and M. Camargo, Glassy phases of the Gaussian core model, Soft Matter 19, 9531 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Sposini, S

    V. Sposini, S. Nampoothiri, A. Chechkin, E. Orlandini, F. Seno, and F. Baldovin, Being heterogeneous is ad- vantageous: Extreme Brownian non-Gaussian searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 117101 (2024); Being hetero- geneous is disadvantageous: Brownian non-Gaussian searches, Phys. Rev. E 109, 034120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    D. B. Madan, P. P. Carr, and E. C. Chang, The variance gamma process and option pricing, Rev. Financ. 2, 79 (1998)

    work page 1998

  75. [75]

    D. B. Madan and E. Seneta, The variance gamma (vg) model for share market returns, J. Bus. , 511 (1990)

    work page 1990

  76. [76]

    S. Kotz, T. J. Kozubowski, K. Podgórski, S. Kotz, T. J. Kozubowski, and K. Podgórski, The Laplace Distribu- tion and Generalizations: A Revisit with Applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering, and Fi- nance (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2001) pp. 15–131

    work page 2001

  77. [77]

    M. M. Meerschaert, T. J. Kozubowski, F. J. Molz, and S. Lu, Fractional laplace model for hydraulic conductiv- ity, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (2004)

    work page 2004

  78. [78]

    Gajda, A

    J. Gajda, A. Wyłomańska, and A. Kumar, Generalized fractional laplace motion, Stat. Probabil. Lett. 124, 101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    W. Wang, Y. Liang, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Met- zler, Non-Gaussian behavior in fractional Laplace mo- tion with drift, Phys. Rev. E 111, 034121 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Yamamoto and A

    R. Yamamoto and A. Onuki, Heterogeneous diffusion in highly supercooled liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4915 (1998)

    work page 1998

Showing first 80 references.