Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Chemically active emulsions with no internal order can exhibit spatiotemporal chaos driven purely by interfacial stresses in Stokes flow, and their amplitude equations match those of Rayleigh-Benard convection with mean flow.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 16:12 UTC pith:XAXPJMHG

load-bearing objection Solid new result: scalar active emulsions in Stokes flow map onto Rayleigh-Benard convection, with plausible chaos evidence; the missing grid-convergence study is the main gap. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.15526 v1 pith:XAXPJMHG submitted 2025-09-19 physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-ph

Fluid flow and spatiotemporal chaos in chemically active emulsions

Charu Datt , Jonathan Bauermann , Nazmi Burak Budanur , Frank J\"ulicher This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-ph
keywords active emulsionsphase separationspatiotemporal chaosStokes flowLyapunov exponentRayleigh-Benard convectionamplitude equationsinterfacial stress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies a minimal model of a binary fluid mixture that phase-separates while chemical reactions A⇌B continually mix it, keeping the system out of equilibrium. The authors show that the chemical reactions drive persistent fluid flows even when inertia is negligible, and that for strong reactions and low viscosity these flows make the demixing pattern evolve chaotically in space and time. Chaos is detected through positive Lyapunov exponents rather than through turbulent velocity fluctuations, and the system lacks the orientational order of active nematics. To place this behavior in a wider context, the authors derive amplitude equations for stripe and hexagonal patterns and find them identical in form to those of Rayleigh-Benard convection with mean flow and stress-free boundaries. If correct, the result identifies a simple, generic mechanism by which living-cell-like droplets can exhibit complex, unpredictable dynamics.

Core claim

The central claim is that a phase-separating binary fluid kept active by constant-rate chemical reactions can develop spatiotemporal chaos through interfacial stresses alone, with no orientational order and no inertia. The model couples a Cahn-Hilliard-type composition field to the Stokes equation through the interfacial force density φ∇μ; the reaction term acts as a reservoir that prevents full demixing. Numerical solution of this model in two dimensions shows that for large hydrodynamic coupling H and reaction strength R the ordered or traveling steady patterns give way to chaotic dynamics, quantified by maximal Lyapunov exponents that remain positive over long integration times. Near the

What carries the argument

The machinery is a dimensionless active emulsion model: a conserved composition field φ obeys a Cahn-Hilliard equation with a chemical-reaction source R(m−φ), and the Stokes equation is forced by the interfacial stress density φ∇μ, where μ is the chemical potential. In the weakly nonlinear analysis, the slow modulations of stripe amplitudes A and hexagonal amplitudes A_n are governed by Ginzburg-Landau equations coupled to a mean flow described by a biharmonic stream-function equation; these equations are identical to Rayleigh-Benard convection at low Prandtl number with stress-free boundary conditions. That formal identity is what lets the authors transfer predictions from a well-studied pa

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that resolving the interface with just two to four grid points per interface width captures the true chaotic dynamics and yields converged Lyapunov exponents, since no systematic grid-convergence study is reported.

What would settle it

Rerun the two-dimensional simulations at doubled and quadrupled resolution (2048 and 4096 points per direction for the same box) at representative parameters such as H=500, R=0.04 and compare the maximal Lyapunov exponents and the space-time pattern; if the positive exponent becomes zero or negative, or the chaotic state disappears, the claim of interfacial-stress-driven spatiotemporal chaos would fail as a numerically robust result. An experiment in a controlled phase-separating enzyme-active droplet system that shows no irregular low-Reynolds-number interfacial dynamics under conditions corr

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Weak reactions or high viscosities drive the system to steady striped, spiral, or target patterns, while strong reactions and low viscosities produce spatiotemporal chaos (positive Lyapunov exponent).
  • The chaotic dynamics arises without fluid inertia, so it represents a distinct low-Reynolds-number chaos different from both classical turbulence and active-nematic turbulence.
  • Near the onset of pattern formation, the amplitude equations for stripes and hexagons are identical in form to Rayleigh-Benard convection with mean flow and stress-free boundaries, implying a shared mathematical description across the two systems.
  • In the absence of hydrodynamics the model maps to an equilibrium diblock-copolymer problem; adding flow breaks that mapping, so interfacial-stress-driven flows are essential for the non-equilibrium chaos.
  • Because the full amplitude equations lack a Lyapunov functional, oscillatory and possibly chaotic amplitude dynamics are allowed, not only relaxational pattern selection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the equivalence to Rayleigh-Benard convection with mean flow holds beyond the weakly nonlinear regime, tools developed for thermal convection (such as reduced-order models for spiral defect chaos) could be repurposed to predict when active-emulsion patterns become chaotic, even though the simulations see target patterns rather than spirals.
  • Editorial inference: The model's prediction of chaos at high H and R is testable in vitro: droplets of phase-separating protein solutions whose chemistry is controlled by enzymes might show irregular, non-repeating droplet-interface motion at low Reynolds numbers, measurable by particle-image velocimetry or interface tracking.
  • Editorial inference: Extending the model to three dimensions, where vorticity stretching is possible, might change the chaotic statistics and Lyapunov-exponent scaling, so the two-dimensional result is not automatically the three-dimensional behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a two-dimensional binary fluid mixture undergoing phase separation with reversible chemical reactions A⇌B, coupled to incompressible Stokes flow through the Cahn-Hilliard formulation (Eqs. (1)–(4)). Direct numerical simulations with a Fourier pseudospectral method find steady lamellar, spiral, and target patterns at weak activity and, at higher reaction rate R and hydrodynamic coupling H, spatiotemporal chaos diagnosed by positive maximal Lyapunov exponents. The authors also derive amplitude equations for stripe and hexagon patterns, Eqs. (7) and (8), and claim they are identical in form to the amplitude equations of Rayleigh-Bénard convection with mean flow and stress-free boundaries. The central conclusions are that chemically active emulsions without orientational order can exhibit low-Reynolds-number chaos driven by interfacial stresses, and that their weakly nonlinear dynamics connect to a well-studied pattern-forming system.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a valuable contribution: it demonstrates a new route to low-Reynolds-number spatiotemporal chaos in a scalar active mixture, distinct from both inertial turbulence and active-nematic turbulence, and it draws an explicit analogy to Rayleigh-Bénard convection that could guide future work. The paper's strengths include the minimal physical model, the direct computation of Lyapunov exponents with checks on perturbation amplitude σ and rescaling interval τ_Λ, the small reported error bars, and the linear-stability analysis leading to the dispersion relation (5). However, the central numerical claim rests on Lyapunov exponents computed at only 2–4 grid points per interface width with no grid-convergence study, and the amplitude-equation derivation is presented only as a final result without the intermediate solvability conditions. In addition, the chaotic simulations are in a parameter regime far from the threshold where the amplitude equations are derived. These gaps must be addressed before the paper's main claims are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical methods and Fig. 1c] The chaos claim is load-bearing and depends entirely on positive maximal Lyapunov exponents computed from simulations at 512 or 1024 points per direction, i.e. about 2–4 points per interface width. The authors state 'The number of grid points in each spatial direction is initially 512, in other words two points per interface width, and 1024 at late times, including when quantifying chaos' but provide no spatial grid-convergence study. The checks on σ and τ_Λ do not address spatial resolution. Since the interface width is the smallest physical scale and the dynamics are driven by interfacial stresses, underresolution could either suppress real instabilities or create spurious small-scale dynamics that change the sign or magnitude of Λ. Please provide a resolution study at, say, 2048 and 4096 grid points for at least one chaotic parameter set, and ideally vary the interface width while kee
  2. [Amplitude equations, Eqs. (7)–(8)] The manuscript states that the amplitude equations are derived 'systematically', but only the scaling ansatz is shown. The solvability conditions at each order, the closure for the mean-flow field B, and the elimination of higher harmonics are not presented. As a result, the central analytical claim that Eqs. (7)–(8) are 'identical in form' to the Rayleigh-Bénard mean-flow amplitude equations cannot be independently checked. Please include the full derivation in an appendix or supplementary material, or at least specify the solvability conditions and the equation that determines B.
  3. [Parameter regime of chaos vs. amplitude equations] The amplitude equations are derived near the pattern-forming threshold R_c = k_c^4 = (1-3m^2)^2/4, i.e. R_c = 0.25 for m = 0. The chaotic simulations in Figs. 1c and 2 use R = 0.04 and 0.08, for which R_c − R is O(0.1), not a small ε^2. Moreover, the hexagon derivation explicitly assumes 3m = ε s and H = ε h, whereas the chaotic runs use m = −0.2 and H = 500. Thus the amplitude equations as derived do not govern the simulated chaotic regime. The authors should either demonstrate chaotic dynamics in the asymptotic regime where the amplitude equations apply, or reframe the claimed connection between the observed spatiotemporal chaos and the Rayleigh-Bénard amplitude equations as an analogy rather than a derivation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, e.g. 'intriquing', 'non-equlibrium', 'symmeteric', 'equlibrium', 'instabiliy', and 'Bousinessq'. A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [References] References [34] and [46] are the same work (Chiam, Paul, Cross, and Greenside, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056206 (2003)) but appear with different formatting. Please merge or correct.
  3. [Fig. 1c] The text says error bars are smaller than the symbol size, but the actual numerical values of Λ are not given. Reporting the values (and the corresponding chaotic parameter pairs) in the text or a table would make the quantitative claim easier to assess.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The mean-flow equation is fourth order in Y but no far-field or boundary conditions are stated for B. Since periodic boundary conditions are used in the simulations, stating the assumed periodicity/mean-zero condition for B would clarify the derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: amplitude equations are derived from the stated model via perturbation theory, and the Rayleigh–Bénard connection is an external benchmark, not a self-citation or fit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, so no significant circularity is found. The governing equations (1)–(4) are a stated minimal model (model H plus a chemical reaction term), not a derived claim, and the dimensionless parameters R, H, and m are physical control inputs rather than fitted values. The amplitude equations (7)–(8) are obtained by a standard multiple-scales expansion from the dimensionless model (3)–(4) with the explicit ansatz in Eq. (6); the claimed identity to Rayleigh–Bénard amplitude equations is a comparison of form to external literature (Hoyle; Siggia–Zippelius; Young–Riecke), not a reduction to the paper's own prior work. The Lyapunov exponents are computed from direct numerical simulation using the external Benettin algorithm, with sensitivity checks on the perturbation amplitude σ and rescaling interval τ_Λ; they are not fitted to produce positive values. Self-citations (e.g., refs. [2], [5], [32], [63]) provide background, parameter estimates, or limitations and are not load-bearing for the central chaos claim or the Rayleigh–Bénard connection. The only notable limitation is numerical resolution: the text reports 'The number of grid points in each spatial direction is initially 512, in other words two points per interface width, and 1024 at late times, including when quantifying chaos' (Results and discussion) and provides no grid-convergence study. This is a numerical/convergence risk, not a circularity, because it does not reduce any prediction to its inputs or to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The model has physical parameters (a, b, kappa, M, eta, Gamma) and dimensionless control parameters R, H, m that are scanned. The main axioms are the model postulates and the numerical resolution assumption. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • H (hydrodynamic coupling) = 0.05 to 500; chaos for high H
    Dimensionless strength of hydrodynamic flows. Scanned across a wide range; chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
  • R (reaction strength) = 0.008, 0.04, 0.08
    Dimensionless reaction rate. Higher values lead to chaos; scanned, not fitted.
  • m (composition asymmetry) = 0, -0.2
    Dimensionless composition asymmetry. Chosen to represent symmetric and asymmetric mixtures; not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The dynamics obey the Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard equations with a linear reaction term R(phi - phi_s) (Eqs. 1-2).
    The model is postulated as the minimal description of chemically active emulsions; all results are about this model, so the central claim depends on its validity as a representation of the physics.
  • domain assumption The free energy is a Ginzburg-Landau double-well functional with constant coefficients; the components have equal density and viscosity.
    Standard model H assumptions; the paper explicitly restricts to this case.
  • domain assumption Constant forward/backward reaction rates break detailed balance, making the system active.
    The activity is the driver of the non-equilibrium dynamics; without it the model reduces to equilibrium diblock copolymer phase separation.
  • standard math Weakly nonlinear multiple-scales expansion is valid with scaling R_c - R = r epsilon^2, 3m = epsilon s, H = epsilon h.
    Standard amplitude-equation methodology (Hoyle 2006); the hexagon scaling follows Young and Riecke 2002.
  • domain assumption Numerical resolution of 2-4 grid points per interface width is sufficient to capture the chaotic dynamics and Lyapunov exponents.
    The paper states the resolution but provides no convergence study; the positive Lyapunov exponents and chaotic states rest on this assumption.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9577 in / 14383 out tokens · 134995 ms · 2026-08-04T16:12:41.757830+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluid flow and spatiotemporal chaos in chemically active emulsions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XAXPJMHG

@misc{pith2026250915526,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluid flow and spatiotemporal chaos in chemically active emulsions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XAXPJMHG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.15526}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study phase-separating fluid mixtures as they demix in the presence of chemical reactions that maintain them away from thermodynamic equilibrium. We show that in such chemically active emulsions the interplay of chemical reactions, phase separation, and hydrodynamics effects complex self-organisation and pattern formation that can give rise to spatiotemporal chaos. This chaotic dynamics, unlike in classical turbulence, is not due to fluid inertia $-$ we analyse the system in the Stokes flow regime $-$ and it is different from the $\textit{turbulence}$ of active nematics at low Reynolds number, for our fluid mixtures lack any orientational order. To explore the generic features of nonlinear dynamics in our system, we derive amplitude equations which we find to be identical to those obtained for Rayleigh-Benard convection with mean flow and stress-free conditions at the top and bottom plates. Chemically active emulsions possessing no internal order, we thus establish, can exhibit chaoticity that is driven by interfacial stresses in the fluid mixture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.15526 by Charu Datt, Frank J\"ulicher, Jonathan Bauermann, Nazmi Burak Budanur.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: For symmeteric mixtures. a) Patterns in ϕ after long times of O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Enroute to spatio-temporal chaos in a 40:60 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. E. Cates and E. Tjhung, Theories of binary fluid mix- tures: from phase-separation kinetics to active emulsions, J. Fluid Mech.836, P1 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    C. A. Weber, D. Zwicker, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. F. Lee, Physics of active emulsions, Rep. Prog. Phys.82, 064601 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    We study the dynamics near this bifurcation point, i.e

    The instabiliy of this mode occurs atR=R c whereR c =k 4 c , so that λ=− k2 −k 2 c 2 +R c −R. We study the dynamics near this bifurcation point, i.e. whenR c −R=rε 2, whereεiso(1) andris the control parameter [38, 39]. We then proceed systematically to derive the ampli- tude equations [38, 40]. Looking first at the slow dynam- ics of stripe patterns align...

  4. [4]

    E. D. Siggia, Late stages of spinodal decomposition in binary mixtures, Phys. Rev. A20, 595 (1979)

    1979

  5. [5]

    A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys. 51, 481 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    Zwicker, A

    D. Zwicker, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Suppression of Ostwald ripening in active emulsions, Phys. Rev. E92, 012317 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Tjhung, C

    E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the Ostwald process, Phys. Rev. X8, 031080 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Berry, C

    J. Berry, C. P. Brangwynne, and M. Haataja, Physi- cal principles of intracellular organization via active and passive phase transitions, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 046601 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Siekevitz, Powerhouse of the cell, Sci

    P. Siekevitz, Powerhouse of the cell, Sci. Am.197, 131 (1957)

    1957

  11. [11]

    D. M. Glover, C. Gonzalez, and J. W. Raff, The centro- some, Sci. Am.268, 62 (1993)

    1993

  12. [12]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline p granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation, Sci- ence324, 1729 (2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    Jawerth, E

    L. Jawerth, E. Fischer-Friedrich, S. Saha, J. Wang, T. Franzmann, X. Zhang, J. Sachweh, M. Ruer, M. Ijavi, S. Saha, J. Mahamid, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Pro- tein condensates as aging maxwell fluids, Science370, 1317 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    H. Wang, F. M. Kelley, D. Milovanovic, B. S. Schuster, and Z. Shi, Surface tension and viscosity of protein con- densates quantified by micropipette aspiration, Biophys. Rep.1, 100011 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Zwicker, The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation, Curr

    D. Zwicker, The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation, Curr. Opin. Colloid In- terface Sci.61, 101606 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    C. Datt, S. P. Thampi, and R. Govindarajan, Morpho- logical evolution of domains in spinodal decomposition, Phys. Rev. E91, 010101 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    S. C. Glotzer, D. Stauffer, and N. Jan, Monte Carlo sim- ulations of phase separation in chemically reactive binary mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 4109 (1994)

    1994

  18. [18]

    Monte Carlo simulations of phase separation in chemi- cally reactive binary mixtures

    R. Lefever, D. Carati, and N. Hassani, Comment on “Monte Carlo simulations of phase separation in chemi- cally reactive binary mixtures”, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1674 (1995)

    1995

  19. [19]

    S. C. Glotzer, D. Stauffer, and N. Jan, Glotzer, Stauffer, and Jan reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1675 (1995)

    1995

  20. [20]

    te Vrugt, B

    M. te Vrugt, B. Liebchen, and M. E. Cates, What ex- actly is ’active matter’ ? (2025), arXiv:2507.21621 [cond- mat.soft]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Leibler, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules13, 1602 (1980)

    L. Leibler, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules13, 1602 (1980)

    1980

  22. [22]

    S. C. Glotzer and A. Coniglio, Self-consistent solution of phase separation with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. E50, 4241 (1994)

    1994

  23. [23]

    Sagui and R

    C. Sagui and R. C. Desai, Kinetics of phase separation in two-dimensional systems with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. E49, 2225 (1994)

    1994

  24. [24]

    R. E. Goldstein, G. H. Gunaratne, L. Gil, and P. Coul- let, Hydrodynamic and interfacial patterns with broken space-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. A43, 6700 (1991)

    1991

  25. [25]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  26. [26]

    Y. Huo, X. Jiang, H. Zhang, and Y. Yang, Hydrody- namic effects on phase separation of binary mixtures with reversible chemical reaction, J. Chem. Phys.118, 9830 (2003). 6

    2003

  27. [27]

    U. M. Ascher, S. J. Ruuth, and R. J. Spiteri, Implicit- explicit runge-kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations, Appl. Num. Math.25, 151 (1997)

    1997

  28. [28]

    N. B. Padhan, K. V. Kiran, and R. Pandit, Novel tur- bulence and coarsening arrest in active-scalar fluids, Soft Matter20, 3620 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Derevyanko, The (n+ 1)/2 rule for dealiasing in the split-step fourier methods forn-wave interactions, IEEE Photon

    S. Derevyanko, The (n+ 1)/2 rule for dealiasing in the split-step fourier methods forn-wave interactions, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20, 1929 (2008)

    1929

  30. [30]

    Choksi, M

    R. Choksi, M. Maras, and J. F. Williams, 2d phase di- agram for minimizers of a cahn–hilliard functional with long-range interactions, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.10, 1344 (2011)

    2011

  31. [31]

    S. C. Glotzer, E. A. Di Marzio, and M. Muthukumar, Reaction-controlled morphology of phase-separating mix- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2034 (1995)

    2034

  32. [32]

    Liu and N

    F. Liu and N. Goldenfeld, Dynamics of phase separation in block copolymer melts, Phys. Rev. A39, 4805 (1989)

    1989

  33. [33]

    Seyboldt and F

    R. Seyboldt and F. J¨ ulicher, Role of hydrodynamic flows in chemically driven droplet division, New J. Phys.20, 105010 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    Karimi, Z.-F

    A. Karimi, Z.-F. Huang, and M. R. Paul, Exploring spiral defect chaos in generalized Swift-Hohenberg models with mean flow, Phys. Rev. E84, 046215 (2011)

    2011

  35. [36]

    Furtado and J

    K. Furtado and J. M. Yeomans, Lattice Boltzmann simu- lations of phase separation in chemically reactive binary fluids, Phys. Rev. E73, 066124 (2006)

    2006

  36. [37]

    Benettin, L

    G. Benettin, L. Galgani, and J.-M. Strelcyn, Kolmogorov entropy and numerical experiments, Phys. Rev. A14, 2338 (1976)

    1976

  37. [38]

    Tanaka, Hydrodynamic interface quench effects on spinodal decomposition for symmetric binary fluid mix- tures, Phys

    H. Tanaka, Hydrodynamic interface quench effects on spinodal decomposition for symmetric binary fluid mix- tures, Phys. Rev. E51, 1313 (1995)

    1995

  38. [39]

    R. B. Hoyle,Pattern formation: an introduction to meth- ods(Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  39. [40]

    Shiwa, The amplitude and phase-diffusion equations for lamellar patterns in block copolymers, Phys

    Y. Shiwa, The amplitude and phase-diffusion equations for lamellar patterns in block copolymers, Phys. Lett. A 228, 279 (1997)

    1997

  40. [41]

    G. H. Gunaratne, Q. Ouyang, and H. L. Swinney, Pattern formation in the presence of symmetries, Phys. Rev. E 50, 2802 (1994)

    1994

  41. [42]

    E. D. Siggia and A. Zippelius, Pattern selection in Rayleigh-B´ enard convection near threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 835 (1981)

    1981

  42. [43]

    Matthews, Hexagonal patterns in finite domains, Phys

    P. Matthews, Hexagonal patterns in finite domains, Phys. D116, 81 (1998)

    1998

  43. [44]

    Young and H

    Y.-N. Young and H. Riecke, Mean flow in hexagonal con- vection: stability and nonlinear dynamics, Phys. D163, 166 (2002)

    2002

  44. [45]

    A. C. Newell and J. A. Whitehead, Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection, J. Fluid Mech.38, 279–303 (1969)

    1969

  45. [46]

    L. A. Segel, Distant side-walls cause slow amplitude mod- ulation of cellular convection, J. Fluid Mech.38, 203–224 (1969)

    1969

  46. [47]

    Chiam, M

    K.-H. Chiam, M. R. Paul, M. C. Cross, and H. S. Green- side, Mean flow and spiral defect chaos in Rayleigh- B´ enard convection, Phys. Rev. E67, 056206 (2003)

    2003

  47. [48]

    Bodenschatz, W

    E. Bodenschatz, W. Pesch, and G. Ahlers, Recent de- velopments in Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.32, 709 (2000)

    2000

  48. [49]

    Shiwa, Hydrodynamic coarsening in striped pattern formation with a conservation law, Phys

    Y. Shiwa, Hydrodynamic coarsening in striped pattern formation with a conservation law, Phys. Rev. E72, 016204 (2005)

    2005

  49. [50]

    Shiwa, Spirals, hexagons, and all that through hy- drodynamic coupling with a zero mode, AIP Conf

    Y. Shiwa, Spirals, hexagons, and all that through hy- drodynamic coupling with a zero mode, AIP Conf. Proc. 832, 205 (2006)

    2006

  50. [51]

    Ohnogi and Y

    H. Ohnogi and Y. Shiwa, Nucleation, growth, and coars- ening of crystalline domains in order-order transitions be- tween lamellar and hexagonal phases, Phys. Rev. E84, 011611 (2011)

    2011

  51. [52]

    T. C. B. McLeish, M. E. Cates, J. S. Higgins, P. D. Olmsted, M. E. Cates, J. Vollmer, A. Wagner, and D. Vollmer, Phase separation in binary fluid mixtures with continuously ramped temperature, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.361, 793 (2003)

    2003

  52. [53]

    A. A. Golovin, A. A. Nepomnyashchy, S. H. Davis, and M. A. Zaks, Convective Cahn-Hilliard models: From coarsening to roughening, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1550 (2001)

    2001

  53. [54]

    A. A. Golovin and L. M. Pismen, Dynamic phase sepa- ration: From coarsening to turbulence via structure for- mation, Chaos14, 845 (2004)

    2004

  54. [55]

    Miike, S

    H. Miike, S. C. M¨ uller, and B. Hess, Oscillatory defor- mation of chemical waves induced by surface flow, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2109 (1988)

    1988

  55. [56]

    Miike, S

    H. Miike, S. C. M¨ uller, and B. Hess, Hydrodynamic flows traveling with chemical waves, Phys. Lett. A141, 25 (1989)

    1989

  56. [57]

    Diewald and H

    M. Diewald and H. R. Brand, Chemically driven con- vection can stabilize turing patterns, Phys. Rev. E51, R5200 (1995)

    1995

  57. [58]

    De Wit, Chemo-hydrodynamic patterns and instabil- ities, Annu

    A. De Wit, Chemo-hydrodynamic patterns and instabil- ities, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.52, 531 (2020)

    2020

  58. [59]

    Huffman and H

    A. Huffman and H. Shum, Boundary-bound reactions: Pattern formation with and without hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. E108, 055103 (2023)

    2023

  59. [60]

    Tiribocchi, R

    A. Tiribocchi, R. Wittkowski, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Active model H: Scalar active matter in a momentum-conserving fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 188302 (2015)

    2015

  60. [61]

    Lowengrub and L

    J. Lowengrub and L. Truskinovsky, Quasi–incompressible Cahn–Hilliard fluids and topological transitions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A.454, 2617 (1998)

    1998

  61. [62]

    Onuki, Domain growth and rheology in phase- separating binary mixtures with viscosity difference, Eu- rophys

    A. Onuki, Domain growth and rheology in phase- separating binary mixtures with viscosity difference, Eu- rophys. Lett.28, 175 (1994)

    1994

  62. [63]

    Y. Huo, H. Zhang, and Y. Yang, Effects of reversible chemical reaction on morphology and domain growth of phase separating binary mixtures with viscosity differ- ence, Macromol. Theory Simul.13, 280 (2004)

    2004

  63. [64]

    Bauermann, S

    J. Bauermann, S. Laha, P. M. McCall, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. A. Weber, Chemical kinetics and mass action in coex- isting phases, J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 19294 (2022)

    2022

  64. [65]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun. Phys.5, 167 (2022)

    2022

  65. [66]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation, J Phys.: Con- dens

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation, J Phys.: Con- dens. Matter12, R207 (2000)

    2000