pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.18255 · v2 · pith:KW2YTN2Dnew · submitted 2025-09-22 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el

Bootstrapping transport in the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords charge transportDrude modelKadanoff-MartinMott-Ioffe-Regel boundGreen's function boundslattice modelsmean free pathdiffusivity
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:KW2YTN2D Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{KW2YTN2D}

Prints a linked pith:KW2YTN2D badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

The Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model cannot hold at microscopic scales in lattice systems and produces a lower bound on collective mean free path that enforces a Mott-Ioffe-Regel limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives constraints on the parameters of the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model for charge transport, which is parameterized by current relaxation time τ, diffusivity D, and compressibility χ. Using upper bounds on the retarded Green's function for charge density, it demonstrates that this effective model is inconsistent with the exponential suppression of spectral weight at the highest frequencies present in any lattice model with local and bounded interactions. Assuming the model captures the low-energy dynamics, the analysis yields a lower bound on the collective mean free path ℓ defined as the square root of τ times D, which directly implies that conventional Drude peaks are impossible when this length scale is much smaller than the underlying lattice spacing.

Core claim

Under the assumption that the low energy dynamics is captured by the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model, we obtain a lower bound on the collective mean free path ℓ ≡ √(τ D). This bound is shown to imply a version of the Mott-Ioffe-Regel bound: systems with ℓ much shorter than the lattice length scale cannot have conventional Drude peaks. The Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model cannot pertain at microscopic energy scales because it is inconsistent with the exponential suppression of spectral weight at the highest frequencies in a lattice model.

What carries the argument

Upper bounds on the retarded Green's function for the charge density, which convert into constraints on the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin parameters τ, D and χ in lattice models with local and bounded interactions.

If this is right

  • The Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model is ruled out at microscopic energy scales due to mismatch with high-frequency spectral weight suppression.
  • A lower bound holds on the collective mean free path ℓ ≡ √(τ D) whenever the model applies at low energies.
  • Conventional Drude peaks are forbidden when ℓ is much smaller than the lattice length scale, giving a version of the Mott-Ioffe-Regel bound.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Green's function bounds could be applied to other low-energy transport descriptions to obtain analogous microscopic limits.
  • Numerical studies of interacting lattice models could directly test whether the extracted lower bound on ℓ is saturated.
  • Experimental transport data in materials near the Mott-Ioffe-Regel limit might be reinterpreted through this effective-model constraint.

Load-bearing premise

The low energy dynamics of the underlying lattice model with local and bounded interactions is captured by the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model.

What would settle it

A material or numerical simulation exhibiting a conventional Drude peak while having collective mean free path much shorter than the lattice spacing would contradict the derived bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.18255 by Aditya Hebbar, Ruby Khondaker, Sean A. Hartnoll, Subham Dutta Chowdhury.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The integrated spectral weight (solid curve) must lie within the shaded region, allowed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The two solid curves are the integrated spectral weight ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic evolution of the collective mean free path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model is a simple low energy and long wavelength description of charge transport, parameterised by the current relaxation timescale $\tau$, charge diffusivity $D$ and charge compressibility $\chi$. We obtain sharp constraints on these parameters in terms of the microscopic energy and length scales of any underlying lattice model with local and bounded interactions. Our primary tools are upper bounds on the retarded Green's function for the charge density in such a setting. We first note that the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model cannot pertain at microscopic energy scales because it is inconsistent with the exponential suppression of spectral weight at the highest frequencies in a lattice model. Secondly, under the assumption that the low energy dynamics is captured by the model, we obtain a lower bound on the collective mean free path $\ell \equiv \sqrt{\tau D}$. This bound is shown to imply a version of the Mott-Ioffe-Regel bound: systems with $\ell$ much shorter than the lattice length scale cannot have conventional Drude peaks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin (DKM) effective model for charge transport, parameterized by relaxation time τ, diffusivity D, and compressibility χ. It derives sharp upper bounds on the retarded charge-density Green's function from locality and bounded interactions in an underlying lattice model. These bounds are used first to show that the DKM form is inconsistent with the exponential decay of spectral weight at high frequencies, and second (under the assumption that DKM captures the low-energy regime) to obtain a lower bound on the collective mean free path ℓ ≡ √(τ D). The bound is shown to imply a version of the Mott-Ioffe-Regel criterion: conventional Drude peaks cannot exist when ℓ is much smaller than the lattice spacing.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a model-independent, locality-based constraint on effective transport parameters that directly limits the applicability of the DKM description. This strengthens the theoretical foundation for the Mott-Ioffe-Regel bound in lattice systems and provides a concrete criterion for when hydrodynamic or Drude-like peaks are admissible. The use of analytic properties of retarded Green's functions and exponential high-frequency suppression is a strength; the result is falsifiable once the low-energy assumption is tested in a concrete microscopic model.

major comments (1)
  1. §3.2, around Eq. (12): the conversion from the Green's-function upper bound to the inequality ℓ ≳ a (lattice spacing) appears to rely on a specific choice of the frequency window in which the DKM form is assumed to hold. Clarify how the window is chosen without circularity and whether the bound remains uniform when the window is varied within the regime where the exponential suppression is still negligible.
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract and §1: the phrase 'sharp constraints' is used; replace with 'rigorous upper bounds' or quantify the sharpness (e.g., by the prefactor in the ℓ bound) to avoid overstatement.
  2. Figure 1: the caption should explicitly state the values of τ, D, χ used in the plotted DKM spectral function and the lattice scale a against which ℓ is compared.
  3. §4: add a short remark on whether the same Green's-function bounds can be applied to other effective models (e.g., with momentum relaxation) or whether the argument is specific to the DKM form.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the helpful request for clarification on the frequency window. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [—] §3.2, around Eq. (12): the conversion from the Green's-function upper bound to the inequality ℓ ≳ a (lattice spacing) appears to rely on a specific choice of the frequency window in which the DKM form is assumed to hold. Clarify how the window is chosen without circularity and whether the bound remains uniform when the window is varied within the regime where the exponential suppression is still negligible.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The frequency window is fixed by the microscopic scales of the lattice model: it extends up to a cutoff ω_max ≪ Λ, where Λ is set by the bandwidth or interaction strength at which the exponential suppression of spectral weight becomes appreciable. This cutoff is determined entirely from the underlying lattice Hamiltonian and is independent of the transport parameters τ and D, eliminating circularity. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit statement of this choice together with a short argument showing that the resulting lower bound ℓ ≳ a is uniform for any window whose upper edge lies in the regime where the exponential suppression remains negligible (i.e., for any fixed fraction of Λ). The Green's-function bound itself supplies a window-independent constraint once the DKM form is assumed to hold throughout that interval, so the numerical prefactor in ℓ ≳ a changes only by O(1) factors under such variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from general properties of retarded Green's functions (analyticity in the upper half-plane, locality of interactions, and boundedness on a lattice) that are independent of the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin parameters. These properties yield upper bounds on the charge-density correlator at high frequencies and short distances. Under the explicit assumption that the low-energy sector is described by the DKM form, the bounds are converted into a lower limit on ℓ ≡ √(τ D). No equation equates the target bound to a fitted quantity by construction, no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified, and the central claim remains conditional on the stated effective-theory premise rather than being smuggled in by definition or renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on analytic properties of retarded Green's functions and the assumption that the effective model applies at low energies. No new particles or forces are introduced. The parameters τ, D, χ are inputs to the effective model rather than fitted outputs of this derivation.

axioms (3)
  • standard math Retarded Green's functions for charge density satisfy standard analyticity and causality properties in local quantum systems.
    Invoked to obtain upper bounds on the spectral weight at high frequencies.
  • domain assumption The underlying model has local and bounded interactions on a lattice.
    Used to guarantee exponential suppression of spectral weight at microscopic energy scales.
  • domain assumption Low-energy dynamics is captured by the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model.
    Required to translate Green's function bounds into constraints on τ and D.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1725 out tokens · 52169 ms · 2026-05-18T14:16:18.655734+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bootstrapping Euclidean Two-point Correlators

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A semidefinite programming bootstrap is formulated for Euclidean two-point correlators in quantum mechanics, yielding rigorous bounds and low-lying spectrum extraction in the ungauged one-matrix model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ziman,Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids

    J. Ziman,Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids. International series of monographs on physics. OUP Oxford, 1960

  2. [2]

    Ioffe and A

    A. Ioffe and A. Regel, Non-crystalline, amorphous, and liquid electronic semiconductors, in Progress in semiconductors, pp. 237–291. 1960

  3. [3]

    Mott, Conduction in non-crystalline systems ix

    N. Mott, Conduction in non-crystalline systems ix. the minimum metallic conductivity, Philosophical Magazine26, 1015–1026, 1972

  4. [4]

    Gunnarsson, M

    O. Gunnarsson, M. Calandra and J. E. Han, Colloquium: Saturation of electrical resistivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 1085–1099, 2003

  5. [5]

    N. E. Hussey, K. Takenaka and H. Takagi, Universality of the mott–ioffe–regel limit in metals, Philosophical Magazine84, 2847–2864, 2004

  6. [6]

    Kittel, Interpretation of the thermal conductivity of glasses, Phys

    C. Kittel, Interpretation of the thermal conductivity of glasses, Phys. Rev.75, 972–974, 1949

  7. [7]

    G. A. Slack, The thermal conductivity of nonmetallic crystals, vol. 34 ofSolid State Physics, pp. 1 – 71. Academic Press, 1979. DOI

  8. [8]

    Auerbach and P

    A. Auerbach and P. B. Allen, Universal high-temperature saturation in phonon and electron transport, Phys. Rev. B29, 2884–2890, 1984

  9. [9]

    D. G. Cahill, S. K. Watson and R. O. Pohl, Lower limit to the thermal conductivity of disordered crystals, Phys. Rev. B46, 6131–6140, 1992

  10. [10]

    C. H. Mousatov and S. A. Hartnoll, On the Planckian bound for heat diffusion in insulators, Nature Phys.16, 579–584, 2020, [arXiv:1908.04792 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]]

  11. [11]

    V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity in bad metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3253–3256, 1995

  12. [12]

    Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 111601, 2005, [arXiv:hep-th/0405231]

  13. [13]

    J. A. N. Bruin, H. Sakai, R. S. Perry and A. P. Mackenzie, Similarity of Scattering Rates in Metals Showing T-Linear Resistivity, Science339, 1227612, 2013

  14. [14]

    Zaanen, Why the temperature is high, Nature430, 512–513, 2004

    J. Zaanen, Why the temperature is high, Nature430, 512–513, 2004

  15. [15]

    S. A. Hartnoll, Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport, Nature Phys.11, 54, 2015, [arXiv:1405.3651 [cond-mat.str-el]]. 17

  16. [16]

    S. A. Hartnoll and A. P. Mackenzie, Colloquium: Planckian dissipation in metals, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041002, 2022, [arXiv:2107.07802 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  17. [17]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, Cambridge, UK, 2011

  18. [18]

    Legros, S

    A. Legros, S. Benhabib, W. Tabis, F. Laliberté, M. Dion, M. Lizaire, B. Vignolle, D. Vignolles, H. Raffy, Z. Z. Li, P. Auban-Senzier, N. Doiron-Leyraud, P. Fournier et al., Universal T-linear resistivity and Planckian dissipation in overdoped cuprates, Nature Physics15, 142–147, 2019

  19. [19]

    Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange Metal in Magic-Angle Graphene with near Planckian Dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076801, 2020

  20. [20]

    E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Commun. Math. Phys.28, 251–257, 1972

  21. [21]

    (Anthony) Chen, A

    C.-F. (Anthony) Chen, A. Lucas and C. Yin, Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 116001, 2023

  22. [22]

    Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets and M. A. Stephanov, Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography, JHEP04, 100, 2008, [arXiv:0712.2451 [hep-th]]

  23. [23]

    An upper bound on transport

    T. Hartman, S. A. Hartnoll and R. Mahajan, Upper Bound on Diffusivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141601, 2017, [arXiv:1706.00019 [hep-th]]

  24. [24]

    Locality Bound for Dissipative Quantum Transport

    X. Han and S. A. Hartnoll, Locality Bound for Dissipative Quantum Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 170601, 2018, [arXiv:1806.01859 [quant-ph]]

  25. [25]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers, Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 261601, 2023, [arXiv:2212.07434 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers, The space of transport coefficients allowed by causality, Nature Phys.20, 1948–1954, 2024, [arXiv:2305.07703 [hep-th]]

  27. [27]

    The stickiness of sound: An absolute lower limit on viscosity and the breakdown of second order relativistic hydrodynamics

    P. Kovtun, G. D. Moore and P. Romatschke, The stickiness of sound: An absolute lower limit on viscosity and the breakdown of second order relativistic hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D84, 025006, 2011, [arXiv:1104.1586 [hep-ph]]

  28. [28]

    Fluctuation bounds on charge and heat diffusion

    P. Kovtun, Fluctuation bounds on charge and heat diffusion, J. Phys. A48, 265002, 2015, [arXiv:1407.0690 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  29. [29]

    L. V. Delacrétaz, T. Hartman, S. A. Hartnoll and A. Lewkowycz, Thermalization, Viscosity and the Averaged Null Energy Condition, JHEP10, 028, 2018, [arXiv:1805.04194 [hep-th]]

  30. [30]

    L. V. Delacretaz, A bound on thermalization from diffusive fluctuations, Nature Phys.21, 669–676, 2025, [arXiv:2310.16948 [cond-mat.str-el]]. 18

  31. [31]

    Grozdanov, Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping, Phys

    S. Grozdanov, Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051601, 2021, [arXiv:2008.00888 [hep-th]]

  32. [32]

    Nussinov and S

    Z. Nussinov and S. Chakrabarty, Planckian bounds from local uncertainty relations, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications636, 1354755, 2025

  33. [33]

    Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys

    M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev.123, 1053–1057, 1961

  34. [34]

    Martin, Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scattering amplitudes, Phys

    A. Martin, Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev.129, 1432–1436, 1963

  35. [35]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP10, 014, 2006, [arXiv:hep-th/0602178]

  36. [36]

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong, Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation, Phys. Rev. D31, 3027, 1985

  37. [37]

    M. R. Pennington and J. Portoles, The Chiral Lagrangian parameters, l1, l2, are determined by the rho resonance, Phys. Lett. B344, 399–406, 1995, [arXiv:hep-ph/9409426]

  38. [38]

    Consistency of the Chiral Pion-Pion Scattering Amplitudes with Axiomatic Constraints

    B. Ananthanarayan, D. Toublan and G. Wanders, Consistency of the chiral pion pion scattering amplitudes with axiomatic constraints, Phys. Rev. D51, 1093–1100, 1995, [arXiv:hep-ph/9410302]

  39. [39]

    On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions

    Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions, JHEP12, 099, 2011, [arXiv:1107.3987 [hep-th]]

  40. [40]

    M. A. Luty, J. Polchinski and R. Rattazzi, Thea-theorem and the Asymptotics of 4D Quantum Field Theory, JHEP01, 152, 2013, [arXiv:1204.5221 [hep-th]]

  41. [41]

    Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics,

    C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 2022. [arXiv:2203.06805 [hep-th]]

  42. [42]

    S. A. Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 224002, 2009, [arXiv:0903.3246 [hep-th]]

  43. [43]

    Positivity bounds on effective field theories with spontaneously broken Lorentz invariance,

    P. Creminelli, O. Janssen and L. Senatore, Positivity bounds on effective field theories with spontaneously broken Lorentz invariance, JHEP09, 201, 2022, [arXiv:2207.14224 [hep-th]]

  44. [44]

    Creminelli, O

    P. Creminelli, O. Janssen, B. Salehian and L. Senatore, Positivity bounds on electromagnetic properties of media, JHEP08, 066, 2024, [arXiv:2405.09614 [hep-th]]

  45. [45]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap II: two dimensional amplitudes, JHEP11, 143, 2017, [arXiv:1607.06110 [hep-th]]

  46. [46]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS, JHEP11, 133, 2017, [arXiv:1607.06109 [hep-th]]. 19

  47. [47]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part III: higher dimensional amplitudes, JHEP12, 040, 2019, [arXiv:1708.06765 [hep-th]]

  48. [48]

    Elias Miró, A

    J. Elias Miró, A. L. Guerrieri, A. Hebbar, J. Penedones and P. Vieira, Flux Tube S-matrix Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 221602, 2019, [arXiv:1906.08098 [hep-th]]

  49. [49]

    Guerrieri, J

    A. Guerrieri, J. Penedones and P. Vieira, Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 081601, 2021, [arXiv:2102.02847 [hep-th]]

  50. [50]

    Guerrieri, H

    A. Guerrieri, H. Murali, J. Penedones and P. Vieira, Where is M-theory in the space of scattering amplitudes?, JHEP06, 064, 2023, [arXiv:2212.00151 [hep-th]]

  51. [51]

    Kruczenski, J

    M. Kruczenski, J. Penedones and B. C. van Rees, Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap, 2022, [arXiv:2203.02421 [hep-th]]

  52. [52]

    Han, Quantum Many-body Bootstrap, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2006.06002, 2020, [arXiv:2006.06002 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    X. Han, Quantum Many-body Bootstrap, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2006.06002, 2020, [arXiv:2006.06002 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  53. [53]

    M. Cho, B. Gabai, Y.-H. Lin, V. A. Rodriguez, J. Sandor and X. Yin, Bootstrapping the Ising Model on the Lattice, 2022, [arXiv:2206.12538 [hep-th]]

  54. [54]

    C. O. Nancarrow and Y. Xin, Bootstrapping the gap in quantum spin systems, JHEP08, 052, 2023, [arXiv:2211.03819 [hep-th]]

  55. [55]

    P. F. Maldague, Optical spectrum of a hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. B16, 2437–2446, 1977

  56. [56]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, D. van der Marel, M. Dressel and K. Haule, Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 471–541, 2011

  57. [57]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck and F. m. c. Huveneers, Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 256803, 2015

  58. [58]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman, A universal operator growth hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X9, 041017, 2019

  59. [59]

    L. P. Kadanoff and P. C. Martin, Hydrodynamic equations and correlation functions, Annals of Physics24, 419–469, 1963

  60. [60]

    N. P. Armitage, Electrodynamics of correlated electron systems, 2025, [arXiv:0908.1126 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  61. [61]

    P. T. Brown, D. Mitra, E. Guardado-Sanchez, R. Nourafkan, A. Reymbaut, C.-D. Hébert, S. Bergeron, A.-M. S. Tremblay, J. Kokalj, D. A. Huse, P. Schauß and W. S. Bakr, Bad metallic transport in a cold atom fermi-hubbard system, Science363, 379–382, 2019

  62. [62]

    R. A. Davison and B. Goutéraux, Momentum dissipation and effective theories of coherent and incoherent transport, JHEP01, 039, 2015, [arXiv:1411.1062 [hep-th]]

  63. [63]

    Chen-Lin, L

    X. Chen-Lin, L. V. Delacrétaz and S. A. Hartnoll, Theory of diffusive fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 091602, 2019, [arXiv:1811.12540 [hep-th]]. 20

  64. [64]

    L. V. Delacretaz, Heavy Operators and Hydrodynamic Tails, SciPost Phys.9, 034, 2020, [arXiv:2006.01139 [hep-th]]

  65. [65]

    A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin and L. V. Delacrétaz, Corrections to Diffusion in Interacting Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. X14, 031020, 2024, [arXiv:2310.10564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  66. [66]

    Mukerjee, V

    S. Mukerjee, V. Oganesyan and D. Huse, Statistical theory of transport by strongly interacting lattice fermions, Phys. Rev. B73, 035113, 2006

  67. [67]

    C. W. Hicks, A. S. Gibbs, A. P. Mackenzie, H. Takatsu, Y. Maeno and E. A. Yelland, Quantum oscillations and high carrier mobility in the delafossitepdcoo2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116401, 2012

  68. [68]

    E. W. Huang, R. Sheppard, B. Moritz and T. P. Devereaux, Strange metallicity in the doped hubbard model, Science366, 987–990, 2019

  69. [69]

    C. H. Mousatov, I. Esterlis and S. A. Hartnoll, Bad metallic transport in a modified hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 186601, 2019

  70. [70]

    L. V. Delacrétaz, B. Goutéraux, S. A. Hartnoll and A. Karlsson, Bad Metals from Fluctuating Density Waves, SciPost Phys.3, 025, 2017

  71. [71]

    Glorioso and S

    P. Glorioso and S. A. Hartnoll, Joule heating in bad and slow metals, SciPost Phys.13, 095, 2022, [arXiv:2202.00689 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  72. [72]

    Córdova, Y

    L. Córdova, Y. He, M. Kruczenski and P. Vieira, The O(N) S-matrix Monolith, JHEP04, 142, 2020, [arXiv:1909.06495 [hep-th]]

  73. [73]

    A. L. Guerrieri, A. Homrich and P. Vieira, Dual S-matrix bootstrap. Part I. 2D theory, JHEP11, 084, 2020, [arXiv:2008.02770 [hep-th]]

  74. [74]

    Lederer, Y

    S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and non-fermi liquid behavior near a nematic quantum critical point, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 4905–4910, 2017

  75. [75]

    New Developments in Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics

    P. Romatschke, New Developments in Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1–53, 2010, [arXiv:0902.3663 [hep-ph]]

  76. [76]

    Spectral sum rules for the quark-gluon plasma

    P. Romatschke and D. T. Son, Spectral sum rules for the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D80, 065021, 2009, [arXiv:0903.3946 [hep-ph]]

  77. [77]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP08, 106, 2016, [arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]]

  78. [78]

    Operator size at finite temperature and Planckian bounds on quantum dynamics

    A. Lucas, Operator size at finite temperature and Planckian bounds on quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 216601, 2019, [arXiv:1809.07769 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  79. [79]

    Poland and D

    D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The conformal bootstrap, Nature Physics12, 535–539, 2016. 21