pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.22797 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Determining the spatial origin of X-ray and optical emission in the z = 3.1 strongly lensed radio-quiet quasar GraL J065904.1+162909 to hundreds of parsecs

Julia Sisk-Reynes , Daniel Schwartz , Anna Barnacka , Cristiana Spingola , Giulia Migliori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 11:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational lensingquasarsX-ray astrometryhigh-redshift AGNChandra observationsGaia astrometryHST imagingradio-quiet quasars
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Gravitational lensing constrains X-ray emission in a z=3 quasar to within a 0.020 by 0.010 arcsecond ellipse offset 0.014 arcseconds from the optical source at 1 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that strong gravitational lensing can act as a high-resolution telescope for milliarcsecond astrometry on distant quasars. The authors derive a lens mass model from Gaia DR3 and HST data that reproduces the four image positions to 1 mas and locates the optical source with matching precision. They then apply a Bayesian comparison to Chandra X-ray observations of the same object, constraining the X-ray emission region to lie inside a small ellipse centered only 0.014 arcseconds away from the optical position. A sympathetic reader would care because the result demonstrates a practical route to mapping AGN structures at sub-kiloparsec scales in the early universe without requiring next-generation telescopes.

Core claim

The authors perform milliarcsecond X-ray astrometry on the quadruply lensed radio-quiet quasar GraL J065904.1+162909 at redshift 3.083. Using a gravitational lens mass model fitted to Gaia DR3 and HST observations that matches the lensed image positions to one milliarcsecond, they determine the optical source position and compare it to Chandra data via Bayesian testing. This yields the constraint that the X-ray emission originates within a 0.020 by 0.010 arcsecond ellipse centered 0.014 arcseconds from the optical source at the 1 sigma level. The work further shows that the same technique can separate soft and hard X-ray regions and discusses its extension to future spectrally resolved astro

What carries the argument

The gravitational lens mass model derived from Gaia DR3 and HST data, which reproduces lensed image positions to 1 mas and thereby places the optical source for direct comparison against Chandra X-ray astrometry.

If this is right

  • The X-ray and optical emission regions in this quasar are spatially coincident within the measured 0.020 by 0.010 arcsecond ellipse.
  • The same astrometric approach can be used to locate the distinct origins of soft and hard X-ray emission in other lensed quasars.
  • Broadband and spectrally resolved X-ray astrometry applied to lensed systems can probe quasar morphology and possible AGN multiplicity at sub-kiloparsec scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the method to a statistical sample of lensed quasars would allow mapping how X-ray and optical emission regions evolve with redshift.
  • A confirmed small offset between X-ray and optical centroids could be tested against models in which the X-ray corona sits slightly above the accretion disk.
  • Combining lensing astrometry with future X-ray missions could distinguish between single and multiple AGN activity in high-redshift systems.

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational lens mass model from Gaia DR3 and HST data accurately reproduces the image positions to 1 mas and correctly places the optical source, with no significant unaccounted systematics in the Chandra astrometry or source morphology assumptions.

What would settle it

A refined lens model or higher-precision observation that shifts the predicted optical source position by more than 1 mas relative to the Gaia images, or that places the X-ray centroid more than 0.02 arcseconds away from that optical location.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.22797 by Anna Barnacka, Cristiana Spingola, Daniel Schwartz, Giulia Migliori, Julia Sisk-Reynes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: red, green, and blue (RGB) image of Orion’s crossbow and its field using the HST filters F160W (red), F814W (green) and F475W (blue). The image is 0.5 arcmin × 0.5 arcmin. Right: Zoom on the system (0.2 arcmin × 0.2 arcmin). The labeling of the four quasar lensed images and of the two deflector systems is kept throughout the text. Both images are centered at J2000 RA 06h 59m 03.971s and Dec +16◦ 29’ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Source plane (left) and image plane (right) reconstructions of the lensed system J0659. The source position predicted by our mass model is tens of milliarcseconds from the inner caustic, making J0659 an ideal candidate for the caustic method (Barnacka 2018). The image plane reconstruction shows that the Gaia DR3 observed lensed images and the model-predicted lensed images agree to better than one milliarcs… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: 0.5–7 keV Chandra image of the quadruply lensed quasar J0659 (ObsID: 23825), binned in 0. ′′25 (approximately half of the size of a native ACIS pixel). The radius of each extraction region (i-th image) is indicated by ri. Error bars in the number of counts correspond to 1σ statistical uncertainties on the number of photon counts enclosed by each region. The box encloses 516 ± 23 X-ray photons. The col… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Schematic showing the grid of putative sources we considered. Each putative source position is color coded according to its corresponding (forward-modeled) predicted lensed images. RA, DEC coordinates are quoted so that the position of image A at the optical source (i.e. that predicted by our mass model) is at (0,0). Right: zoom into the grid of putative source positions, defining a triangular region… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 68.3%, 95.5% and 99.7% CL contours for the origin of the soft X-ray emission (magenta) and the hard X-ray emission (orange) in J0659. The orange and magenta stars indicate the most likely origin of the soft and hard X-ray emissions in J0659, respectively. RA, DEC coordinates are quoted so that the position of image A at the optical source (represented by the black star) is at (0,0). Lines connecting each q… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Chandra image of the quadruply lensed quasar J0659 (ObsID: 23825), binned in 0. ′′25 (i.e., half the size of a native ACIS pixel), for soft (0.5–2 keV, top) and hard (2–7 keV, bottom) X-ray emission. The centroid and radial extent of each of the four circular regions corresponding to each quasar lensed image match those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projected separation vs. redshift for a sample of AGN, updated from Chen et al. (2022) and Spingola et al. (2022). The gray points correspond to the HST-discovered unlensed pairs through optical varstrometry in HST from Chen et al. (2022). The shaded region in blue outlines the discovery space for rare AGN and complex AGN morphology of strongly lensed quasars that have existing Gaia DR3 detections and arch… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform milliarcsecond X-ray astrometry of the quadruply lensed radio-quiet quasar GraL J065904.1+162909 (J0659). This $z = 3.083$ quasar is lensed into four images and was discovered with the second Data Release of the $Gaia$ Space Observatory ($Gaia$ DR2). Our J0659 study exploits strong gravitational lenses as high resolution telescopes. This technique shows promise to elucidate the origin of optical and X-ray emission in distant lensed quasars at spatial scales beyond the reach of current instruments. In our study, we use $Gaia$ DR3 and $HST$ observations of J0659 to infer a mass model for the deflector. Our model reproduces the $Gaia$ DR3 quasar lensed image positions to one milliarcsecond and determines the position of the optical source in J0659 to within this precision. Next, we analyze $Chandra$ observations of J0659 and conduct a Bayesian test evaluating whether the X-ray emission region coincides with the optical source. We then constrain the origin of the X-ray emission to within a $0.''020 \times 0.''010$ ellipse centered $0.''014$ away from the optical source at the $1\sigma$ level. We demonstrate that our approach can be extended to pinpoint the distinct origins of the soft and hard X-ray emission regions in lensed quasars. We discuss the potential of upcoming broadband and spectrally resolved X-ray astrometric studies to probe complex quasar morphology and AGN multiplicity at sub-kiloparsec scales otherwise inaccessible at high redshifts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to perform milliarcsecond X-ray astrometry on the quadruply lensed radio-quiet quasar GraL J065904.1+162909 at z=3.083 by modeling the deflector mass from Gaia DR3 and HST data to reproduce image positions to 1 mas and locate the optical source. Chandra observations are then analyzed via a Bayesian test to constrain the X-ray emission origin to a 0.020 × 0.010 arcsec ellipse centered 0.014 arcsec from the optical source at the 1σ level, with discussion of extensions to soft/hard X-ray separation.

Significance. If the central offset result holds after validation, the work provides a concrete demonstration of using strong lensing for sub-arcsecond astrometry of high-redshift quasar emission regions, enabling tests of AGN multiplicity and complex morphology at scales of hundreds of parsecs that are otherwise inaccessible. The approach is extensible to spectrally resolved X-ray studies and merits attention for its potential to deliver falsifiable spatial constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lens modeling] The lens mass model section: the reproduction of Gaia DR3 image positions to 1 mas is stated but lacks explicit tabulation of residuals, covariance with mass-model parameters, or tests for unaccounted systematics (e.g., higher-order multipoles or external shear) that would propagate into the source-plane optical position and the subsequent 0.014 arcsec X-ray offset.
  2. [Chandra analysis and Bayesian test] The Chandra analysis and Bayesian test section: no quantitative error budget is supplied for absolute astrometric alignment between the Chandra frame and the Gaia/HST optical reference, nor for PSF convolution or source morphology assumptions; these directly determine whether the reported 1σ ellipse (0.020 × 0.010 arcsec) remains meaningful or is dominated by frame-registration uncertainty.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and methods] The abstract and methods would benefit from a brief statement of the number of Chandra counts and any data filtering applied before the Bayesian inference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The lens mass model section: the reproduction of Gaia DR3 image positions to 1 mas is stated but lacks explicit tabulation of residuals, covariance with mass-model parameters, or tests for unaccounted systematics (e.g., higher-order multipoles or external shear) that would propagate into the source-plane optical position and the subsequent 0.014 arcsec X-ray offset.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit tabulation of the residuals would improve the clarity of our lens modeling results. In the revised version, we will add a table listing the observed Gaia DR3 positions, the modeled positions, and the residuals for each image. We will also include an analysis of the covariance matrix for the mass-model parameters and perform additional tests for unaccounted systematics such as higher-order multipoles and external shear. These additions will allow us to better quantify their potential impact on the derived source-plane optical position and the reported X-ray offset. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The Chandra analysis and Bayesian test section: no quantitative error budget is supplied for absolute astrometric alignment between the Chandra frame and the Gaia/HST optical reference, nor for PSF convolution or source morphology assumptions; these directly determine whether the reported 1σ ellipse (0.020 × 0.010 arcsec) remains meaningful or is dominated by frame-registration uncertainty.

    Authors: We recognize the need for a detailed error budget in the astrometric analysis. In the revised manuscript, we will provide a quantitative assessment of the absolute astrometric alignment uncertainty between the Chandra observations and the Gaia/HST reference frame, drawing on the known astrometric precision of Chandra and the specifics of our alignment procedure. Furthermore, we will discuss the contributions from PSF convolution and assumptions about source morphology to the overall uncertainty, and evaluate whether these dominate the reported 1σ ellipse or if the offset remains significant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation separates independent datasets: the lens mass model is constructed solely from Gaia DR3 and HST optical image positions (reproducing them to 1 mas), after which a Bayesian test is applied to distinct Chandra X-ray data to constrain the source-plane offset. This does not reduce any central claim to a fitted parameter defined by the same inputs, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The approach is self-contained against external astrometric benchmarks and exhibits no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result depends on the accuracy of the deflector mass model fitted to optical image positions and on the assumption that Chandra astrometric uncertainties are well characterized for the Bayesian coincidence test.

free parameters (1)
  • Deflector mass model parameters
    Parameters adjusted to reproduce the four Gaia DR3 lensed image positions to 1 mas precision.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The gravitational lens mass model derived from Gaia DR3 and HST data places the optical source position correctly to within 1 mas.
    This premise is required to define the reference optical location against which the X-ray offset is measured.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5878 in / 1406 out tokens · 51022 ms · 2026-05-18T11:46:01.607427+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Anders and N

    Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 1993

  3. [3]

    Antonucci, R. R. J., & Miller, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 297, 621, doi: 10.1086/163559

    work page doi:10.1086/163559 1985

  4. [4]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    A., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Culhane, J

    Arnaud, K. A., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Culhane, J. L., et al. 1985, MNRAS, 217, 105, doi: 10.1093/mnras/217.1.105 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astro...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/217.1.105 1985

  6. [6]

    W., Dauser, T., et al

    Bambi, C., Brenneman, L. W., Dauser, T., et al. 2021, SSRv, 217, 65, doi: 10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8 2021

  7. [7]

    2018, PhR, 778, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.001

    Barnacka, A. 2018, PhR, 778, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.001 2018

  8. [8]

    2006, A&A, 448, 499, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054091

    Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., & Chiaberge, M. 2006, A&A, 448, 499, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054091

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054091 2006

  9. [9]

    A., Pooley, D., Rappaport, S., & Schechter, P

    Blackburne, J. A., Pooley, D., Rappaport, S., & Schechter, P. L. 2011, ApJ, 729, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/34

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/34 2011

  10. [10]

    2025, sherpa/sherpa: Sherpa 4.17.1, 4.17.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.593753

    Burke, D., Laurino, O., wmclaugh, et al. 2025, sherpa/sherpa: Sherpa 4.17.1, 4.17.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.593753

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.593753 2025

  11. [11]

    2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Burke-Spolaor, S., Blecha, L., Bogdanovi´ c, T., et al. 2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, ed. E. Murphy, 677 16

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    2009a, ApJ, 693, 174, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174 —

    Garmire, G. 2009a, ApJ, 693, 174, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174 —. 2009b, ApJ, 693, 174, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/174

  13. [13]

    2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 356, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612313

    Chartas, G., Rhea, C., Kochanek, C., et al. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 356, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612313

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201612313 2016

  14. [14]

    2022, ApJ, 925, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac401b

    Chen, Y.-C., Hwang, H.-C., Shen, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac401b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac401b 2022

  15. [15]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4476

    Connor, T., Stern, D., Krone-Martins, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4476

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4476 2022

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Crummy, J., Fabian, A. C., Gallo, L., & Ross, R. R. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1067, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x 2006

  17. [17]

    S., Chartas, G., et al

    Dai, X., Kochanek, C. S., Chartas, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 278, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/278

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/278 2010

  18. [18]

    C., Trump, J

    Davis, M. C., Trump, J. R., Charisi, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.05742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.05742

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05742 2025

  19. [19]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3084

    DeGraf, C., Chen, N., Ni, Y., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3084

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3084 2024

  20. [20]

    2019, A&A, 622, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833802

    Delchambre, L., Krone-Martins, A., Wertz, O., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833802

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833802 2019

  21. [21]

    A radio census of lensed systems

    Dobie, D., Sluse, D., Deller, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 5880, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad4002 D’Orazio, D. J., & Charisi, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.16896, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.16896

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad4002 2024

  22. [22]

    2025a, A&A, 697, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553807

    Dux, F., Millon, M., Galan, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553807

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553807

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Dux, F., Millon, M., Lemon, C., et al. 2025b, A&A, 694, A300, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452970

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452970

  24. [24]

    McHardy, I. M. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3931, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu249

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu249 2014

  25. [25]

    N., Evans, J

    Evans, I. N., Evans, J. D., Mart´ ınez-Galarza, J. R., et al. 2024, ApJS, 274, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad6319

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad6319 2024

  26. [26]

    2023, Low-Mass X-ray Binaries, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 94-1

    Fabbiano, G., & Elvis, M. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo (Springer Living Reference Work), 92, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 111-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 2022

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Fabian, A. C., Rees, M. J., Stella, L., & White, N. E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729, doi: 10.1093/mnras/238.3.729

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/238.3.729 1989

  28. [28]

    2020, ApJ, 892, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab72fa

    Foord, A., G¨ ultekin, K., Nevin, R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab72fa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab72fa 2020

  29. [29]

    T., et al

    Foord, A., G¨ ultekin, K., Reynolds, M. T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 877, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab18a3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab18a3 2019

  30. [30]

    2024, Universe, 10, 237, doi: 10.3390/universe10060237

    Foord, A., Cappelluti, N., Liu, T., et al. 2024, Universe, 10, 237, doi: 10.3390/universe10060237

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10060237 2024

  31. [31]

    2001, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Freeman, P., Doe, S., & Siemiginowska, A. 2001, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4477, Astronomical Data Analysis, ed. J.-L. Starck & F. D. Murtagh, 76–87, doi: 10.1117/12.447161

    work page doi:10.1117/12.447161 2001

  32. [32]

    and Allen, Glenn E

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.671760 2006

  33. [33]

    A., Rosner, R., & Vaiana, G

    Galeev, A. A., Rosner, R., & Vaiana, G. S. 1979, ApJ, 229, 318, doi: 10.1086/156957

    work page doi:10.1086/156957 1979

  34. [34]

    E., Kim, D

    Gianolli, V. E., Kim, D. E., Bianchi, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 4468, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1697

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1697 2023

  35. [35]

    E., Bianchi, S., Kammoun, E., et al

    Gianolli, V. E., Bianchi, S., Kammoun, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451645

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451645 2024

  36. [36]

    2001, ApJ, 552, 508, doi: 10.1086/320581

    Venturi, T. 2001, ApJ, 552, 508, doi: 10.1086/320581

    work page doi:10.1086/320581 2001

  37. [37]

    A., Boyce, M

    Gordon, Y. A., Boyce, M. M., O’Dea, C. P., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 175, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/abbe23

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abbe23 2020

  38. [38]

    and Maraschi, L

    Haardt, F., & Maraschi, L. 1991, ApJL, 380, L51, doi: 10.1086/186171 —. 1993, ApJ, 413, 507, doi: 10.1086/173020

    work page doi:10.1086/186171 1991

  39. [39]

    Halpern, J. P. 1984, ApJ, 281, 90, doi: 10.1086/162077

    work page doi:10.1086/162077 1984

  40. [40]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  41. [41]

    E., Biretta, J

    Harris, D. E., Biretta, J. A., Junor, W., et al. 2003, ApJL, 586, L41, doi: 10.1086/374773

    work page doi:10.1086/374773 2003

  42. [42]

    E., Cheung, C

    Harris, D. E., Cheung, C. C., Biretta, J. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 211, doi: 10.1086/500081

    work page doi:10.1086/500081 2006

  43. [43]

    Perlman, E. S. 2009, ApJ, 699, 305, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/305 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/305 2009

  44. [44]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  45. [45]

    H., Cohen, L., Edgar, R

    Jerius, D. H., Cohen, L., Edgar, R. J., et al. 2004, in X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. W. Siegmund, Vol. 5165, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 402 – 410, doi: 10.1117/12.509378 17

    work page doi:10.1117/12.509378 2004

  46. [46]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    N., Fabian, A

    Kara, E., Alston, W. N., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1695

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1695 2016

  48. [48]

    Keeton, C. R. 2001a, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0102340 —. 2001b, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0102341

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0102340

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., & Green, R. 1989, AJ, 98, 1195, doi: 10.1086/115207

    work page doi:10.1086/115207 1989

  50. [50]

    A., & Barnacka, A

    Casey-Clyde, J. A., & Barnacka, A. 2023, ApJ, 955, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace16f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace16f 2023

  51. [51]

    Kochanek, C. S. 2004, ApJ, 605, 58, doi: 10.1086/382180

    work page doi:10.1086/382180 2004

  52. [52]

    S., & Dalal, N

    Kochanek, C. S., & Dalal, N. 2004, ApJ, 610, 69, doi: 10.1086/421436

    work page doi:10.1086/421436 2004

  53. [53]

    2012, ApJL, 746, L22, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/746/2/L22

    Koss, M., Mushotzky, R., Treister, E., et al. 2012, ApJL, 746, L22, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/746/2/L22

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/746/2/l22 2012

  54. [54]

    H., & Kriss, G

    Krolik, J. H., & Kriss, G. A. 2001, ApJ, 561, 684, doi: 10.1086/323442

    work page doi:10.1086/323442 2001

  55. [55]

    2022, A&A, 657, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142138

    Lemon, C., Millon, M., Sluse, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142138

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142138 2022

  56. [56]

    150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars

    Lemon, C., Anguita, T., Auger-Williams, M. W., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 3305, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3721

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3721 2023

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Lemon, C., Courbin, F., More, A., et al. 2024, SSRv, 220, 23, doi: 10.1007/s11214-024-01042-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01042-9 2024

  58. [58]

    H., Prigozhin, G

    Li, J., Kastner, J. H., Prigozhin, G. Y., et al. 2004, ApJ, 610, 1204, doi: 10.1086/421866

    work page doi:10.1086/421866 2004

  59. [59]

    Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603, doi: 10.1093/mnras/168.3.603

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 1974

  60. [60]

    Magdziarz, P., & Zdziarski, A. A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 837, doi: 10.1093/mnras/273.3.837

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/273.3.837 1995

  61. [61]

    and Hopkins, Philip F

    Schurch, N. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 250, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14255.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14255.x 2009

  62. [62]

    W., Kochanek, C

    Morgan, C. W., Kochanek, C. S., Dai, X., Morgan, N. D., & Falco, E. E. 2008, ApJ, 689, 755, doi: 10.1086/592767

    work page doi:10.1086/592767 2008

  63. [63]

    M., & Kochanek, C

    Mosquera, A. M., & Kochanek, C. S. 2011, ApJ, 738, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/96

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/96 2011

  64. [64]

    M., Kochanek, C

    Mosquera, A. M., Kochanek, C. S., Chen, B., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/53

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/53 2013

  65. [65]

    Nair, S., Jin, C., & Garrett, M. A. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 1157, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09355.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09355.x 2005

  66. [66]

    Nandra, K., & George, I. M. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/267.4.974

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/267.4.974 1994

  67. [67]

    Nandra, K., & Pounds, K. A. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 405, doi: 10.1093/mnras/268.2.405

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/268.2.405 1994

  68. [68]

    M., Treu, T., Wright, S

    Nierenberg, A. M., Treu, T., Wright, S. A., Fassnacht, C. D., & Auger, M. W. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2434, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu862

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu862 2014

  69. [69]

    1995, ApJ, 444, 567, doi: 10.1086/175631

    Padovani, P., & Giommi, P. 1995, ApJ, 444, 567, doi: 10.1086/175631

    work page doi:10.1086/175631 1995

  70. [70]

    and Alexander, D

    Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., et al. 2017, A&A Rv, 25, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 2017

  71. [71]

    S., Chatterjee, R., & Agrawal, V

    Pal, I., Stalin, C. S., Chatterjee, R., & Agrawal, V. K. 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 87, doi: 10.1007/s12036-023-09981-5 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09981-5 2023

  72. [72]

    Pringle, J. E. 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033 Ramos Almeida, C., & Ricci, C. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 679, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033 1981

  73. [73]

    2025, MNRAS, 542, L78, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf064

    Rantala, A., & Naab, T. 2025, MNRAS, 542, L78, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf064

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf064 2025

  74. [74]

    C., Reynolds, M

    Reis, R. C., Reynolds, M. T., Miller, J. M., & Walton, D. J. 2014, Nature, 507, 207, doi: 10.1038/nature13031

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13031 2014

  75. [75]

    Reynolds, C. S. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 117, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022 2021

  76. [76]

    S., & Fabian, A

    Reynolds, C. S., & Fabian, A. C. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 1167, doi: 10.1093/mnras/273.4.1167

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/273.4.1167 1995

  77. [77]

    T., Walton, D

    Reynolds, M. T., Walton, D. J., Miller, J. M., & Reis, R. C. 2014, ApJL, 792, L19, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/792/1/L19

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/792/1/l19 2014

  78. [78]

    2025, ApJ, 987, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add71a

    Rogers, A., Schwartz, D., Spingola, C., & Barnacka, A. 2025, ApJ, 987, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add71a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add71a 2025

  79. [79]

    R., & Fabian, A

    Ross, R. R., & Fabian, A. C. 1993, MNRAS, 261, 74, doi: 10.1093/mnras/261.1.74

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/261.1.74 1993

  80. [80]

    R., Fabian, A

    Ross, R. R., Fabian, A. C., & Mineshige, S. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 189, doi: 10.1093/mnras/258.1.189

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.189 1992

Showing first 80 references.