pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2510.00114 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-30 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· nucl-th

Chiral effects and Joule heating in hot and dense matter

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 11:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEnucl-th
keywords chiral magnetic effectJoule heatingchiral chemical potentialdense mattermagnetic field growthsupernovaeneutron star mergersQCD scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher temperatures reverse the hierarchy so that small electron chiral chemical potentials can still drive growing magnetic fields and deposit QCD-scale energy via chiral magnetic effect Joule heating.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Earlier work indicated that electron mass would cause chirality flipping fast enough to erase magnetic field growth from chiral imbalances unless those imbalances were as large as the vector chemical potential. This analysis shows that at higher temperatures the flipping rate no longer dominates in that way, allowing the instability to amplify fields from much smaller initial chiral potentials. The paper also identifies a new channel in which density fluctuations source the chiral magnetic effect and turn it into an efficient Joule heating mechanism. As a result, chiral chemical potentials of only a few keV can inject energy densities set by the QCD scale over timescales of milliseconds to seconds, with possible consequences for the evolution of supernovae and neutron star mergers.

Core claim

In hot and dense matter the temperature dependence of the chirality flipping rate reverses the expected hierarchy, so that an initial electron chiral chemical potential much smaller than the vector chemical potential can still produce growing magnetic fields through chiral plasma instability. In addition, when density fluctuations are present in a magnetized medium, the chiral magnetic effect they induce becomes a powerful source of Joule heating, allowing even keV-scale chiral chemical potentials to deposit energy densities characteristic of the QCD scale within a few milliseconds or seconds.

What carries the argument

Temperature-dependent chirality flipping rate that weakens relative to the instability growth at high temperature, together with the chiral magnetic effect sourced by density fluctuations that converts into Joule heating.

If this is right

  • Magnetic field growth occurs from initial chiral chemical potentials substantially smaller than the vector chemical potential once temperature is high enough.
  • Density fluctuations in a magnetized hot dense medium turn the chiral magnetic effect into a strong Joule heating source.
  • Modest keV chiral chemical potentials deposit energy densities set by the QCD scale on timescales of milliseconds to seconds.
  • The heating mechanism can influence the dynamics of turbulent density fluctuations in supernovae and neutron star mergers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the temperature reversal holds, similar chiral-driven heating could appear in other high-temperature dense systems where modest imbalances are present.
  • The mechanism implies possible feedback between chiral imbalance and the overall energy budget or stability of dense astrophysical objects.
  • Rapid energy deposition from small imbalances might alter the timescale on which density fluctuations evolve beyond standard hydrodynamic treatments.

Load-bearing premise

The chirality flipping rate continues to be set by the electron mass term without additional damping or equilibration channels becoming important at the higher temperatures and densities considered.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation that includes extra equilibration processes at high temperature and density and finds that magnetic field growth remains suppressed or that heating rates stay far below QCD-scale values would falsify the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.00114 by Srimoyee Sen, Varun Vaidya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. We plot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Initial states of dense matter with nonzero electron chiral imbalance could potentially give rise to strong magnetic fields through chiral plasma instability. Previous work indicated that unless chiral chemical potential is as large as the electron vector chemical potential, the growth of magnetic fields due to the instability is washed out by chirality flipping rate enabled by electron mass. We re-examine this claim in a broader range of parameters and find that at higher temperatures the hierarchy is reversed supporting a growing magnetic field for an initial electron chiral chemical potential much smaller than the electron vector chemical potential. Further, we identify a qualitatively new effect relevant for magnetized hot and dense medium where chiral magnetic effect (CME) sourced by density fluctuation acts as a powerful source of Joule heating. Remarkably, even modest chiral chemical potentials (keV) in such environment can deposit energy densities set by the QCD scale in a relatively short time of the order of a few milliseconds or seconds. We speculate how this mechanism makes CME-driven Joule heating a potentially critical ingredient in the dynamics of turbulent density fluctuation of supernovae and neutron star mergers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript re-examines chiral plasma instability in hot and dense matter with nonzero electron chiral chemical potential. It claims that at higher temperatures the rate hierarchy reverses, permitting exponential growth of magnetic fields even when the initial electron chiral chemical potential is much smaller than the vector chemical potential. The authors further identify a new effect in which density fluctuations source the chiral magnetic effect, producing Joule heating that can deposit QCD-scale energy densities on timescales of milliseconds to seconds from keV-scale chiral imbalances, with speculated relevance to supernovae and neutron-star mergers.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would be significant for models of magnetogenesis and energy transport in extreme astrophysical environments. The temperature-dependent reversal of instability versus flipping rates and the identification of CME-driven Joule heating as a dominant channel in magnetized hot-dense media could affect turbulent dynamics in neutron-star mergers. The approach applies standard chiral-plasma equations to a broader parameter range, but the absence of explicit rate derivations and numerical results limits immediate assessment of robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (chirality relaxation rate): the claim that the hierarchy reverses at higher T, allowing B-field growth for μ5 ≪ μV, rests on the assumption that Γ_flip remains controlled solely by the electron-mass term as parameterized in earlier literature. Additional channels such as electron-quark scattering or plasmon-mediated flips, whose T and μ dependence differs from m_e²/T, are not quantified; if any become comparable, the growth rate no longer exceeds Γ_flip and the reversal disappears. This is load-bearing for both the instability and the subsequent heating claims.
  2. [§5] §5 (Joule-heating estimate): the statement that keV-scale μ5 deposits QCD-scale energy densities in a few milliseconds to seconds via CME sourced by density fluctuations lacks explicit expressions for the heating rate, integration over fluctuation spectra, or numerical results. Without these, it is not possible to verify that the effect is parametrically dominant or that the quoted timescales follow from the equations rather than order-of-magnitude estimates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it stated the specific temperature or density range in which the hierarchy reversal is found.
  2. [Notation] Notation for chemical potentials (μ5 versus μV) should be defined once and used consistently in all equations and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the chirality relaxation rate and the Joule-heating estimates. We address each major point below, clarifying the basis of our claims while indicating revisions that will strengthen the presentation and robustness of the results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (chirality relaxation rate): the claim that the hierarchy reverses at higher T, allowing B-field growth for μ5 ≪ μV, rests on the assumption that Γ_flip remains controlled solely by the electron-mass term as parameterized in earlier literature. Additional channels such as electron-quark scattering or plasmon-mediated flips, whose T and μ dependence differs from m_e²/T, are not quantified; if any become comparable, the growth rate no longer exceeds Γ_flip and the reversal disappears. This is load-bearing for both the instability and the subsequent heating claims.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need to confirm the dominance of the mass-induced chirality flip. Our analysis adopts the standard parameterization Γ_flip ∝ m_e²/T from the literature, as this is the leading contribution in the high-temperature regime considered. We find that the instability growth rate increases sufficiently with temperature to reverse the hierarchy relative to this rate, permitting exponential B-field growth for μ5 ≪ μV. We acknowledge that channels such as electron-quark scattering and plasmon-mediated flips were not explicitly quantified in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we will add order-of-magnitude estimates of these rates for the relevant temperatures and densities, showing that they remain subdominant to the electron-mass term in the parameter window where the reversal occurs. Should these estimates indicate otherwise, we will qualify the claims accordingly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Joule-heating estimate): the statement that keV-scale μ5 deposits QCD-scale energy densities in a few milliseconds to seconds via CME sourced by density fluctuations lacks explicit expressions for the heating rate, integration over fluctuation spectra, or numerical results. Without these, it is not possible to verify that the effect is parametrically dominant or that the quoted timescales follow from the equations rather than order-of-magnitude estimates.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation of the Joule-heating effect would benefit from greater explicitness. The estimate follows from the CME current driven by density fluctuations in a magnetized medium, which sources an effective electric field and subsequent resistive heating. In the revision we will supply the explicit heating-rate expression, including the integral over the assumed density-fluctuation spectrum, and provide numerical evaluations for representative values (μ5 ∼ keV, T and density in the hot-dense regime). These will demonstrate that the deposited energy density reaches QCD scales on the quoted timescales and confirm parametric dominance over other channels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation applies standard chiral-plasma equations to new regimes with no self-referential fitting or definitional collapse

full rationale

The paper re-examines the chiral plasma instability growth rate by inserting the standard expression involving μ5, μV, and the chirality-flipping rate Γ_flip (modeled from prior literature as ~m_e²/T) into the dispersion relation for magnetized hot-dense matter. The reported hierarchy reversal at high T and the CME-driven Joule heating timescale both follow directly from solving these equations in the new parameter window; neither quantity is obtained by fitting to the target observable nor defined in terms of itself. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain or an ansatz smuggled from the authors' own prior work. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract alone; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are stated. The work relies on standard chiral-plasma-instability and CME equations whose detailed assumptions are not visible here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Chirality flipping rate is set by electron mass and remains the dominant damping mechanism across the temperature range examined.
    Invoked when re-examining the previous claim that growth is washed out unless chiral chemical potential is comparable to vector chemical potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1309 out tokens · 33397 ms · 2026-05-18T11:20:35.290345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Chiral plasma instability (CPI) triggered by an electron chiral imbalance in dense matter,

  2. [2]

    While the first of these two effects is widely studied in the literature, the latter is not

    Joule/ohmic heating of dense matter with electron chiral imbalance in strong background magnetic fields. While the first of these two effects is widely studied in the literature, the latter is not. In this paper we re-examine the viability of the former in dense matter as well as propose the latter as a significant source of energy dissipation in hot and ...

  3. [3]

    4, there is an instability in favor of growing electromagnetic fields

    Chiral plasma instability It turns out with the CME term included in the Maxwell’s equations as in Eq. 4, there is an instability in favor of growing electromagnetic fields. To see this effect we can directly solve for the instability by considering a gauge field ansatz in Coulomb gauge (∇ ·A= 0) A0 = 0,A= (ˆxcos(kz)−ˆysin(kz))e t/τ Ak(0) (5) whereA k(0) ...

  4. [4]

    We can consider the modified Maxwell’s equation Eq

    Joule heating in a strong magnetic field Highly magnetized neutron star environments like magnetars and merging neutron stars can host very strong magnetic fields, sometimes of the order of 10 18 Gauss which is of the order of Λ 2 QCD where Λ QCD is the QCD scale. We can consider the modified Maxwell’s equation Eq. 4 in this environment. The electromagnet...

  5. [5]

    (25) Combining Eq

    The regime ofT≫µ 5 Let’s first consider the limit ofT≫µ 5 in which case ˙f+(k)≈ eβ(|k|−µe)(β˙µ5) 2(1 +e β(|k|−µe))2 , ˙f−(k)≈ − eβ(|k|−µe)(β˙µ5) 2(1 +e β(|k|−µe))2 (22) 7 leading to ˙f+ − ˙f− ≈ eβ(|k|−µe)(β˙µ5) (1 +e β(|k|−µe))2 (23) as well as ˙f+(k)≈ Z d3k′ (2π)9 d3p′d3p 2ωk2ωk′2ωp2ωp′ |M+−|2(2π)4δ4(p′ +k ′ −p−k)× eβ(|k|−µe)(−βµ5) (eβ(|k|−µe) + 1)(eβ(|k...

  6. [6]

    In this limit, the linearization of the distribution functions inµ 5 as shown in Eq

    The regime ofT≪µ 5 We will now go to the opposite limit ofµ 5 ≫Twhich was not considered in [9]. In this limit, the linearization of the distribution functions inµ 5 as shown in Eq. 22 and 23 does not apply. However, we can compute the rate at whichf + andf − change from the helicity flipping due to the mass term. More specifically, we will investigate ˙f...

  7. [7]

    Let’s first considerT≫µ 5

    The regime of T≫µ 5 was considered in [23] and our calculation reproduces its results. Let’s first considerT≫µ 5. In this limit, one can linearize the deviation in the distribution functions and compute ˙µ5 µ5 using Eq. 26. The new element is thatf P now represents a degenerate distribution function. In the opposite limit (µ 5 ≫T), linearizing the distrib...

  8. [8]

    28 with the expression for amplitude squared as given in Eq

    The regime ofT≫µ 5 In the limit ofµ 5 ≪T, one can recompute the rate in Eq. 28 with the expression for amplitude squared as given in Eq. 27 treating the protons as a degenerate gas ˙µ5 =−2µ 5 Z d3k′ (2π)6 d3p 2ωk2ωk′4ω2p 128π2α2 EM m2(1−cosθ)ω 2 p (2|k|2(1−cosθ) +m 2 D)2 (2π)δ(|k ′| − |k|) (eβ(|k|−µe) + 1) (eβ(|k′|−µe) + 1)f(p)(1−f(p)).(34) Using the resu...

  9. [9]

    However, we can again study the behavior of ˙f+ − ˙f− as enabled by the electron mass

    The regime ofT < µ 5,µ 2 5 < M T In this regime, as before, we cannot linearize the distribution functions inβµ 5. However, we can again study the behavior of ˙f+ − ˙f− as enabled by the electron mass. Interestingly, the corresponding rate matches with Eq. 37. The calculational details are similar to those in section III A 2 and we don’t repeat them here....

  10. [10]

    As we will see this is valid as long asµ 2 5 < M T

    The regime ofµ 5 > T,µ 2 5 > M T We have thus far ignored electron-electron collision in the calculation of the chirality flip rate. As we will see this is valid as long asµ 2 5 < M T. In the regime ofµ 2 5 > M Telectron -electron collision can play a dominant role in chirality flip due to electron mass. To show this, we will compute ˙f± in this regime. S...

  11. [11]

    We can then obtain a scaling for the proton chemical potential by demanding that the medium is electrically neutral

    Non-degenerate proton distribution By non-degenerate protons, we mean the regime whereT≫T p. We can then obtain a scaling for the proton chemical potential by demanding that the medium is electrically neutral. In this analysis we assume the electron is relativistic while the proton can be treated non-relativistically, i.e.M≫k F ≫m e. Moreover we are worki...

  12. [12]

    Degenerate proton distribution This is the regime whereT p ≫T. In this case, for the integral over the proton distribution function, we can write Z p2dpfP (p) =− p π 2 PolyLog h 3 2 ,−e β(µP −M) i β M 3/2 ≈ p π 2 (βTp)3/2 β M 3/2 Γ[3/2 + 1] = (TpM) 3/2 3 .(A5) This follows fromµ P −M≈T p and utilizing the limit PolyLog[ν,−e z]z→∞ =−z ν/Γ[ν+ 1]. Again from...

  13. [13]

    The Chiral Magnetic Effect

    Kenji Fukushima, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Harmen J. Warringa, “The Chiral Magnetic Effect,” Phys. Rev. D78, 074033 (2008), arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Polarized electromagnetic radiation by chiral media with time-dependent chiral chemical potential,

    Kirill Tuchin, “Polarized electromagnetic radiation by chiral media with time-dependent chiral chemical potential,” (2025), arXiv:2508.12923 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    Dynamical evolution of the chiral magnetic effect: Applications to the quark-gluon plasma

    Cristina Manuel and Juan M. Torres-Rincon, “Dynamical evolution of the chiral magnetic effect: Applications to the quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. D92, 074018 (2015), arXiv:1501.07608 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma

    Kirill Tuchin, “Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. C91, 064902 (2015), arXiv:1411.1363 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    Photon radiation in hot nuclear matter by means of chiral anomalies

    Kirill Tuchin, “Photon radiation in hot nuclear matter by means of chiral anomalies,” Phys. Rev. C99, 064907 (2019), arXiv:1903.02629 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    Chiral Plasma Instabilities

    Yukinao Akamatsu and Naoki Yamamoto, “Chiral Plasma Instabilities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 052002 (2013), arXiv:1302.2125 [nucl-th]

  19. [19]

    The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport

    Dmitri E. Kharzeev, “The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.75, 133–151 (2014), arXiv:1312.3348 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    Energy Conservation and the Chiral Magnetic Effect

    David B. Kaplan, Sanjay Reddy, and Srimoyee Sen, “Energy Conservation and the Chiral Magnetic Effect,” Phys. Rev. D96, 016008 (2017), arXiv:1612.00032 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    The Role of the Electron Mass in Damping Chiral Magnetic Instability in Supernova and Neutron Stars

    Dorota Grabowska, David B. Kaplan, and Sanjay Reddy, “Role of the electron mass in damping chiral plasma instability in Supernovae and neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D91, 085035 (2015), arXiv:1409.3602 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Chiral transport of neutrinos in supernovae: Neutrino-induced fluid helicity and helical plasma instability

    Naoki Yamamoto, “Chiral transport of neutrinos in supernovae: Neutrino-induced fluid helicity and helical plasma insta- bility,” Phys. Rev. D93, 065017 (2016), arXiv:1511.00933 [astro-ph.HE]

  23. [23]

    Effective Chiral Magnetic Effect from Neutrino Radiation,

    Naoki Yamamoto and Di-Lun Yang, “Effective Chiral Magnetic Effect from Neutrino Radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 012701 (2023), arXiv:2211.14465 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation

    Xu-Guang Huang, Kentaro Nishimura, and Naoki Yamamoto, “Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation,” JHEP 02, 069 (2018), arXiv:1711.02190 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Magnetars and the Chiral Plasma Instabilities

    Akira Ohnishi and Naoki Yamamoto, “Magnetars and the Chiral Plasma Instabilities,” (2014), arXiv:1402.4760 [astro- ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    Chiral Shock Waves

    Srimoyee Sen and Naoki Yamamoto, “Chiral Shock Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 181601 (2017), arXiv:1609.07030 [hep- th]

  27. [27]

    Macroscopic parity-violating effects: Neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal radiation,

    Alexander Vilenkin, “Macroscopic parity-violating effects: Neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. D20, 1807–1812 (1979)

  28. [28]

    Charge separation induced by P-odd bubbles in QCD matter

    D. Kharzeev and A. Zhitnitsky, “Charge separation induced by P-odd bubbles in QCD matter,” Nucl. Phys. A797, 67–79 (2007), arXiv:0706.1026 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies,

    Dam T. Son and Piotr Sur´ owka, “Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 191601 (2009)

  30. [30]

    Gravitational Anomaly and Transport

    Karl Landsteiner, Eugenio Megias, and Francisco Pena-Benitez, “Gravitational Anomaly and Transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021601 (2011), arXiv:1103.5006 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Chiral Magnetic Wave

    Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Ho-Ung Yee, “Chiral Magnetic Wave,” Phys. Rev. D83, 085007 (2011), arXiv:1012.6026 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Chiral vortical wave and induced flavor charge transport in a rotating quark-gluon plasma

    Yin Jiang, Xu-Guang Huang, and Jinfeng Liao, “Chiral vortical wave and induced flavor charge transport in a rotating quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. D92, 071501 (2015), arXiv:1504.03201 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Berry Curvature, Triangle Anomalies, and the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Fermi Liquids

    Dam Thanh Son and Naoki Yamamoto, “Berry Curvature, Triangle Anomalies, and the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Fermi Liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 181602 (2012), arXiv:1203.2697 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. 16

  34. [34]

    Chiral Magnetic Effect in Protoneutron Stars and Magnetic Field Spectral Evolution

    G¨ unter Sigl and Natacha Leite, “Chiral Magnetic Effect in Protoneutron Stars and Magnetic Field Spectral Evolution,” JCAP01, 025 (2016), arXiv:1507.04983 [astro-ph.HE]

  35. [35]

    Relaxation of the chiral imbalance and the generation of magnetic fields in magnetars

    Maxim Dvornikov, “Relaxation of the chiral imbalance and the generation of magnetic fields in magnetars,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys.123, 967–978 (2016), arXiv:1510.06228 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Perego, S

    Albino Perego, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and David Radice, “Thermodynamics conditions of matter in neutron star mergers,” Eur. Phys. J. A55, 124 (2019), arXiv:1903.07898 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Fields, A

    Jacob Fields, Aviral Prakash, Matteo Breschi, David Radice, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Andr´ e da Silva Schneider, “Thermal Effects in Binary Neutron Star Mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett.952, L36 (2023), arXiv:2302.11359 [astro-ph.HE]

  38. [38]

    General-Relativistic Large-Eddy Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Mergers

    David Radice, “General-Relativistic Large-Eddy Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett.838, L2 (2017), arXiv:1703.02046 [astro-ph.HE]

  39. [39]

    Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants

    A. Perego, Stephan Rosswog, Ruben M. Cabez´ on, Oleg Korobkin, Roger K¨ appeli, Almudena Arcones, and Matthias Liebend¨ orfer, “Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.443, 3134–3156 (2014), arXiv:1405.6730 [astro-ph.HE]

  40. [40]

    The Dynamics of Binary Neutron Star Mergers and GW170817,

    David Radice, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Albino Perego, “The Dynamics of Binary Neutron Star Mergers and GW170817,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 95–119 (2020), arXiv:2002.03863 [astro-ph.HE]

  41. [41]

    Turbulent magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers,

    Carlos Palenzuela, Ricard Aguilera-Miret, Federico Carrasco, Riccardo Ciolfi, Jay Vijay Kalinani, Wolfgang Kastaun, Borja Mi˜ nano, and Daniele Vigan` o, “Turbulent magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D106, 023013 (2022), arXiv:2112.08413 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers

    Kenta Kiuchi, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Koutarou Kyutoku, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, and Masaru Shibata, “Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D92, 124034 (2015), arXiv:1509.09205 [astro-ph.HE]

  43. [43]

    Equilibration of the chiral asymmetry due to finite electron mass in electron-positron plasma,

    A. Boyarsky, V. Cheianov, O. Ruchayskiy, and O. Sobol, “Equilibration of the chiral asymmetry due to finite electron mass in electron-positron plasma,” Phys. Rev. D103, 013003 (2021), arXiv:2008.00360 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Electrical conductivity of neutron star matter,

    Gordon Baym, Christopher Pethick, and David Pines, “Electrical conductivity of neutron star matter,” Nature224, 674–675 (1969)

  45. [45]

    Effect of magnetic fields on Urca rates in neutron star mergers,

    Pranjal Tambe, Debarati Chatterjee, Mark Alford, and Alexander Haber, “Effect of magnetic fields on Urca rates in neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. C111, 035809 (2025), arXiv:2409.09423 [nucl-th]