pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.00587 · v3 · pith:UNAJ52JKnew · submitted 2025-10-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Transition between 2D Symmetry Protected Topological Phases on a Klein Bottle

Vibhu Ravindran , Bowen Yang , Xie Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords SPT phaseKlein bottlesymmetry defectZ2 symmetryground state degeneracyphase transitionnon-orientable manifoldlattice model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A symmetry defect along the Klein bottle's orientation-reversing cycle adds an extra charge to the ground state of a 2D Z2 SPT phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how 2D Z2 symmetry-protected topological phases respond when placed on a Klein bottle. Inserting a symmetry defect along the orientation-reversing cycle causes the ground state to acquire an extra charge. This response stays well-defined even at the transition into the trivial phase, producing an exact two-fold ground state degeneracy that does not depend on system size. The authors establish the effect with exactly solvable lattice models and numerical calculations across the transition, and relate it to modular properties of 3+1D Z2 gauge theory.

Core claim

We find that when a symmetry defect is inserted along the orientation-reversing cycle of the Klein bottle, the ground state of the 2+1D Z2 SPT phase acquires an extra charge. This symmetry response remains well defined at transition points into the trivial SPT phase, resulting in an exact two-fold degeneracy in the ground state independent of the system size. We demonstrate the effect using exactly solvable lattice models as well as numerical work across the transition and connect the result to the modular transformation of the 3+1D Z2 gauge theory and the emergent nature of the parity symmetry in the Z2 SPT phase.

What carries the argument

The symmetry defect inserted along the orientation-reversing cycle of the Klein bottle, which induces an extra charge in the ground state and produces a size-independent two-fold degeneracy at the transition to the trivial phase.

If this is right

  • The two-fold degeneracy provides a robust, size-independent signature that distinguishes the SPT phase from the trivial phase on the Klein bottle.
  • The charge response remains detectable even near the critical point, offering a probe of the SPT phase that does not rely on a finite energy gap.
  • The result links the emergent parity symmetry of the 2D Z2 SPT phase to the modular transformations of a 3+1D Z2 gauge theory.
  • Numerical confirmation across the transition shows that the exact solvability results hold beyond the special solvable points.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The persistent degeneracy on a non-orientable surface could be used to protect quantum information against local perturbations in a manner independent of system size.
  • Analogous defect insertions on other non-orientable manifolds such as the real projective plane may uncover similar responses in Z2 or other SPT phases.
  • The connection to 3+1D gauge theory suggests that 2D SPT phases can be viewed as dimensional reductions of higher-dimensional topological orders.
  • The size-independent degeneracy might appear in entanglement spectra or other observables at the transition, providing additional diagnostics.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry response and resulting degeneracy are assumed to be captured accurately by the chosen exactly solvable lattice models and confirmed by numerical work without being dominated by finite-size or manifold-specific artifacts.

What would settle it

If the two-fold ground state degeneracy splits or becomes size-dependent when the system size is increased or when different lattice regularizations are used on the Klein bottle, the claim of an exact, size-independent degeneracy would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.00587 by Bowen Yang, Vibhu Ravindran, Xie Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Changing from a torus to a Klein bottle. A semion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. A tripartite (red, green, black) triangular lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the distinct ways the symmetry defect line intersects a Hamiltonian term and the corresponding modifications to the Hamiltonian term. For example, the first term is modified through the conjugation of X1X2. B′ v = X1X2BvX1X2 = (X0CZ34CZ45CZ56)(X1X2CZ61CZ12CZ23X1X2) = −Z6Z1Z2Z3Bv (3) The modification to the other terms can be similarly calculated and are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Action of the single plaquette term in the double semion model on a minimal lattice on the torus (top row) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Rules for deforming the loop configurations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The phase boundary between the SPT phases and the ferromagnetic phase found using this method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase diagram of the model in Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Energy gap for different sytem sizes along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Dehn twist along a cylinder. The red line is shown to help visualize the translation. There are two Dehn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. S transformation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Gapped phases of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The green surface is a 2-torus embedded into the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The green surface is an embedded essential 2-torus in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Sandwich for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. In the sandwich structure, the defining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Possible ordering of the non-commuting product [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Manifolds with nontrivial topology play an essential role in the study of topological phases of matter. In this paper, we study the nontrivial symmetry response of the $2+1$D $Z_2$ symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phase when the system is put on a non-orientable manifold -- the Klein bottle. In particular, we find that when a symmetry defect is inserted along the orientation-reversing cycle of the Klein bottle, the ground state of the system gets an extra charge. This response remains well defined at transition points into the trivial SPT phase, resulting in an exact two-fold degeneracy in the ground state independent of the system size. We demonstrate the symmetry response using exactly solvable lattice models of the SPT phase, as well as numerical work across the transition. We explore the connection of this result to the modular transformation of the $3+1$D $Z_2$ gauge theory and the emergent nature of the parity symmetry in the $Z_2$ SPT phase.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the symmetry response of 2+1D Z_2 symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases on the non-orientable Klein bottle. It claims that inserting a symmetry defect along the orientation-reversing cycle induces an extra charge in the ground state; this response persists at the transition into the trivial SPT phase and produces an exact two-fold ground-state degeneracy that is independent of system size. The claim is supported by exactly solvable lattice models of the SPT phase together with numerical simulations across the transition, and is connected to the modular transformations of 3+1D Z_2 gauge theory and the emergent parity symmetry of the Z_2 SPT phase.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a concrete, topology-dependent diagnostic for 2D SPT phases that remains sharp even at a critical point. The use of exactly solvable lattice models constitutes a clear strength, furnishing parameter-free demonstrations of the extra-charge response and the resulting degeneracy. The link to 3+1D gauge-theory modular data adds theoretical context and suggests a possible route to higher-dimensional generalizations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical simulations section] Numerical results across the transition: the assertion of an exact, size-independent two-fold degeneracy at the SPT-trivial critical point requires explicit finite-size scaling data (energy splitting versus linear size L) to demonstrate that any observed degeneracy is not an artifact of small lattices, open-boundary effects, or Klein-bottle topology. Without such scaling analysis or a clear statement of the system sizes and extrapolation procedure, the numerical confirmation does not yet fully rule out the finite-size or manifold-specific concerns raised in the stress-test note.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the degeneracy is 'independent of the system size'; a brief clarification in the main text on whether this holds exactly for all finite sizes (via the solvable models) or only in the thermodynamic limit would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive feedback on the numerical evidence. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical simulations section] Numerical results across the transition: the assertion of an exact, size-independent two-fold degeneracy at the SPT-trivial critical point requires explicit finite-size scaling data (energy splitting versus linear size L) to demonstrate that any observed degeneracy is not an artifact of small lattices, open-boundary effects, or Klein-bottle topology. Without such scaling analysis or a clear statement of the system sizes and extrapolation procedure, the numerical confirmation does not yet fully rule out the finite-size or manifold-specific concerns raised in the stress-test note.

    Authors: We agree that explicit finite-size scaling strengthens the numerical confirmation. The exactly solvable lattice models already establish the exact, size-independent two-fold degeneracy analytically for the SPT phase and its persistence at the transition. The numerical results were intended to illustrate that this feature survives across the critical point on finite Klein-bottle systems. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated finite-size scaling subsection (or figure) showing the ground-state energy splitting ΔE versus linear size L for multiple system sizes (up to the largest feasible L for the chosen geometry and boundary conditions). We will also state the precise system sizes employed, the extrapolation procedure to the thermodynamic limit, and confirm that ΔE remains consistent with zero (within numerical accuracy) with no discernible L-dependent splitting that would indicate an artifact. This addition directly addresses the concern about finite-size or manifold-specific effects while preserving the original claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit lattice models and numerics

full rationale

The paper derives the symmetry response and size-independent degeneracy directly from exactly solvable lattice models of the Z2 SPT phase on the Klein bottle and from numerical diagonalization across the transition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain; the central claim is presented as an output of these constructions rather than an input. External connections to 3+1D gauge theory modular transformations are exploratory and not used to justify the lattice results. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated models and simulations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard framework of 2+1D Z2 SPT phases and their symmetry responses on non-orientable manifolds; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence and defining properties of 2+1D Z2 symmetry-protected topological phases
    Invoked as the background for studying defect responses on the Klein bottle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5703 in / 1398 out tokens · 169863 ms · 2026-05-21T21:30:15.528047+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Genus-protected higher-order topological phases

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Higher-order topological phases can be protected solely by the bulk gap, fundamental symmetries, and the global topology of the system shape via its genus, independent of crystalline symmetries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980)

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, physrep12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    W. Son, L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Hamma, S. Pascazio, and V. Vedral, Quantum phase transition between cluster and antiferromagnetic states, EPL (Euro- physics Letters)95, 50001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    J. H. Pixley, A. Shashi, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Frus- tration and multicriticality in the antiferromagnetic spin-1 chain, Phys. Rev. B90, 214426 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the landau-ginzburg-wilson paradigm, Physical Review B70, 10.1103/physrevb.70.144407 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.144407 2004

  6. [6]

    A. W. Sandvik, Continuous quantum phase transi- tion between an antiferromagnet and a valence-bond solid in two dimensions: Evidence for logarithmic corrections to scaling, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 177201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: Symmetries and dualities, Phys. Rev. X7, 031051 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    C.-M. Jian, A. Thomson, A. Rasmussen, Z. Bi, and C. Xu, Deconfined quantum critical point on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B97, 195115 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Y. Q. Qin, Y.-Y. He, Y.-Z. You, Z.-Y. Lu, A. Sen, A. W. Sandvik, C. Xu, and Z. Y. Meng, Duality between the deconfined quantum-critical point and the bosonic topological transition, Phys. Rev. X7, 031052 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Xu and G.-M

    W.-T. Xu and G.-M. Zhang, Tensor network state approach to quantum topological phase transitions and their criticalities of 𭟋2 topologically ordered states, Phys. Rev. B98, 165115 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    He, H.-Q

    Y.-Y. He, H.-Q. Wu, Y.-Z. You, C. Xu, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Bona fide interaction-driven topological phase transition in correlated symmetry- protected topological states, Phys. Rev. B93, 115150 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Grover and A

    T. Grover and A. Vishwanath, Quantum phase transition between integer quantum hall states of bosons, Phys. Rev. B87, 045129 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Lu and D.-H

    Y.-M. Lu and D.-H. Lee, Quantum phase transitions between bosonic symmetry-protected topological phases in two dimensions: Emergent qed3 and anyon superfluid, Phys. Rev. B89, 195143 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, One- dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions, Phys. Rev. B96, 165124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, D. Mao, and C. Xu, Quantum phase transitions between bosonic symmetry-protected topological states without sign problem: Nonlinear sigma model with a topological term, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    S. C. Morampudi, C. von Keyserlingk, and F. Poll- mann, Numerical study of a transition between 𭟋2 topologically ordered phases, Phys. Rev. B90, 035117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    L. Tsui, F. Wang, and D.-H. Lee, Topologi- cal versus landau-like phase transitions (2015), arXiv:1511.07460 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Dupont, S

    M. Dupont, S. Gazit, and T. Scaffidi, Evidence for deconfined u(1) gauge theory at the transition between toric code and double semion, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140412 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, The integer quantum hall plateau transition is a current algebra after all, Nuclear Physics B941, 458 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, Gapless symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041048 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    You and Y.-Z

    Y. You and Y.-Z. You, Stripe melting and a transition between weak and strong symmetry protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B93, 195141 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    X. Chen, F. Wang, Y.-M. Lu, and D.-H. Lee, Critical theories of phase transition between symmetry protected topological states and their relation to the gapless boundary theories, Nuclear Physics B 873, 248 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Tsui, H.-C

    L. Tsui, H.-C. Jiang, Y.-M. Lu, and D.-H. Lee, Quantum phase transitions between a class of symmetry protected topological states, Nuclear 19 Physics B896, 330 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Tsui, Y.-T

    L. Tsui, Y.-T. Huang, and D.-H. Lee, A holographic theory for the phase transitions between fermionic symmetry-protected topological states, Nuclear Physics B949, 114799 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    W. Ji, N. Tantivasadakarn, and C. Xu, Boundary states of three dimensional topological order and the deconfined quantum critical point, SciPost Physics 15, 10.21468/scipostphys.15.6.231 (2023)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.6.231 2023

  26. [26]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Building models of topological quantum criticality from pivot hamiltonians, SciPost Physics14, 10.21468/scipostphys.14.2.013 (2023)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.14.2.013 2023

  27. [27]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Gapless topological phases and symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, Physical Review X11, 10.1103/physrevx.11.041059 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041059 2021

  28. [28]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Moradi, S

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, Topological holography: Towards a unification of landau and beyond-landau physics (2022), arXiv:2207.10712 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Huang and M

    S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng, Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states (2023), arXiv:2310.16878 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen, and H. Zheng, Boundary- bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers (2015), arXiv:1502.01690 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.155136 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.155136 2023

  33. [33]

    Lichtman, R

    T. Lichtman, R. Thorngren, N. H. Lindner, A. Stern, and E. Berg, Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states, Phys. Rev. B104, 075141 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri, and Y. Tachikawa, Asymptotic density of states in 2d cfts with non-invertible symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep03(2023)094 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)094 2023

  35. [35]

    Bhardwaj, D

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and J. Wu, Gapped phases in (2+1)d with non-invertible symmetries: Part i (2024), arXiv:2408.05266 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    A. P. O. Chan, J. C. Y. Teo, and S. Ryu, Topological phases on non-orientable surfaces: twisting by parity symmetry, New Journal of Physics18, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    F. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.-Z. You, and X.-G. Wen, Modular transformations and topological orders in two dimensions (2014), arXiv:1303.0829 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    Kawabata, A

    N. Bultinck, Uv perspective on mixed anomalies at critical points between bosonic symmetry-protected phases, Physical Review B100, 10.1103/phys- revb.100.165132 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2019

  39. [39]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model block distribution functions, Z

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model block distribution functions, Z. Phys. B43, 119 (1981)

    work page 1981

  40. [40]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Grover, A. Turner, M. Oshikawa, and A. Vishwanath, Quasiparticle statistics and braiding from ground-state entanglement, Phys. Rev. B85, 235151 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Johannson, Dehn twists of 3-manifolds, inHomo- topy Equivalences of 3-Manifolds with Boundaries (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1979) pp

    K. Johannson, Dehn twists of 3-manifolds, inHomo- topy Equivalences of 3-Manifolds with Boundaries (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1979) pp. 187–226

    work page 1979

  42. [42]

    Mapping class groups of non-orientable surfaces for beginners

    L. Paris, Mapping class groups of non-orientable surfaces for beginners (2014), arXiv:1410.1123 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Chen and B

    L. Chen and B. Tshishiku, Mapping class groups of circle bundles over a surface (2023), arXiv:2301.05375 [math.GT]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    W. Ji, D. T. Stephen, M. Levin, and X. Chen, Bulk excitations of invertible phases (2025), arXiv:2506.11288 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Kawahigashi, A remark on gapped domain walls between topological phases, Letters in Mathematical Physics105, 893 (2015)

    Y. Kawahigashi, A remark on gapped domain walls between topological phases, Letters in Mathematical Physics105, 893 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Science338(6114), 1604–1606 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227224

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological orders in inter- acting bosonic systems, Science338, 1604 (2012), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1227224

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1227224 2012

  47. [47]

    Wen,Quantum field theory of many-body systems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons(Oxford university press, 2004)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum field theory of many-body systems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons(Oxford university press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    D. T. Stephen and X. Chen, Fusion of one- dimensional gapped phases and their domain walls, Phys. Rev. B110, 165144 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Zhao and X

    J.-Y. Zhao and X. Chen, Fusion of low-entanglement excitations in 2D toric code, SciPost Phys.18, 106 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    M. B. Hastings, Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. B69, 104431 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. B72, 045141 (2005)

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2015(2), 172 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2015, 10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015

  53. [53]

    Roumpedakis, S

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Higher gauging and non-invertible condensation defects, Communications in Mathematical Physics 401, 3043 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Tantivasadakarn and X

    N. Tantivasadakarn and X. Chen, String operators for cheshire strings in topological phases, Physical Review B109, 10.1103/physrevb.109.165149 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.165149 2024

  55. [55]

    Kitaev and L

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls, Communications in Mathematical Physics313, 351 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases, Physical Review B71, 10.1103/physrevb.71.045110 (2005). 20 Appendix A: Calculating the SPT ground state symmetry charge using the gauged theory An independent calculation of the ground state symmetry charge calculated in Section. II can be performed by gauging...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.045110 2005