pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.01962 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-02 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Dispersion relations: foundations

Bastian Kubis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 10:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords dispersion relationscausalityanalyticityscattering amplitudesresonance polesRoy equationspion-pion scatteringthree-body decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

Causality in physical systems requires scattering amplitudes to be analytic functions in the complex energy plane.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper traces how the requirement that no effect can precede its cause in time forces scattering amplitudes to obey analyticity properties in quantum mechanics. Starting with simple mechanical oscillators and wave propagation, it shows that this analyticity directly yields dispersion relations that connect real and imaginary parts of amplitudes. These relations let physicists relate production processes to scattering data and extract resonance parameters even when they lie on unphysical sheets. The treatment extends to modern tools such as Roy equations for pion-pion scattering and dispersion relations for three-body decays. A sympathetic reader sees the work as establishing the mathematical backbone that lets data-driven methods replace model assumptions in low-energy hadron physics.

Core claim

Causality, implemented through the vanishing of commutators for spacelike separations, implies that scattering amplitudes are analytic in the complex energy plane except for cuts and poles required by unitarity and crossing; dispersion relations then follow by contour integration and yield integral constraints between real and imaginary parts of amplitudes.

What carries the argument

The mapping from strict causality to analyticity of the S-matrix in the complex plane, which converts time-ordered response functions into Hilbert-transform dispersion integrals.

If this is right

  • Hadronic production amplitudes and form factors are constrained by on-shell scattering data through dispersion integrals.
  • Resonance poles on unphysical Riemann sheets can be located from physical-region data alone.
  • Roy equations provide a rigorous, data-driven route to pion-pion phase shifts and scattering lengths.
  • Dispersion relations for three-body decays allow consistent treatment of final-state interactions without explicit resonance models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same causality-analyticity link should apply to effective theories of low-energy nuclear reactions, offering model-independent constraints on few-body amplitudes.
  • High-precision lattice QCD results for form factors can be cross-checked against dispersion predictions derived from experimental scattering.
  • Extensions to multi-channel systems with coupled thresholds may reveal new sum rules testable at future lepton colliders.

Load-bearing premise

Physical processes obey strict causality at every energy scale with no exceptions from underlying microscopic dynamics.

What would settle it

A measured scattering amplitude whose real and imaginary parts fail to satisfy the predicted dispersion integral while still respecting time-ordered causality would disprove the claimed link.

read the original abstract

We give a pedagogical introduction to the founding ideas of dispersion relations in particle physics. Starting from elementary mechanical systems, we show how the physical principle of causality is closely related to the mathematical property of analyticity, and how both are implemented in quantum mechanical scattering theory. We present a personal selection of elementary applications such as the relation between hadronic production amplitudes or form factors to scattering, and the extraction of resonance properties on unphysical Riemann sheets. More advanced topics such as Roy equations for pion--pion scattering and dispersion relations for three-body decays are briefly touched upon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a pedagogical introduction to the foundations of dispersion relations in particle physics. It starts from elementary mechanical systems to connect the physical principle of causality with analyticity in the complex plane, then implements these ideas in quantum mechanical scattering theory via the S-matrix. The text covers applications including relations of hadronic production amplitudes and form factors to scattering, extraction of resonance properties on unphysical Riemann sheets, and briefly touches on Roy equations for pion-pion scattering and dispersion relations for three-body decays.

Significance. If the explanations hold, the paper offers a clear, self-contained pedagogical resource that reinforces standard links between causality and analyticity without introducing new derivations, data, or free parameters. This can aid training in high-energy physics by grounding advanced topics like Roy equations in elementary linear response and S-matrix properties, consistent with textbook treatments.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states that the paper presents 'a personal selection' of applications; the introduction or §2 should explicitly list the chosen topics and their pedagogical rationale to help readers navigate the scope.
  2. [Resonance extraction section] In the discussion of resonance properties on unphysical sheets, the notation for the complex energy plane and branch cuts could be clarified with an additional diagram or explicit definition of the sheet labels to avoid ambiguity for readers new to the topic.
  3. [Advanced topics] The brief treatment of three-body decays would benefit from one or two key references to recent literature on dispersion relations in that context, even if the focus is foundational.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript as a pedagogical resource on the foundations of dispersion relations. We appreciate the recognition that it reinforces standard links between causality and analyticity in a self-contained manner consistent with textbook treatments, and we are pleased with the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard pedagogical derivation from causality input

full rationale

The paper is a pedagogical exposition that takes strict causality (vanishing response for t<0) as the foundational physical input by design, then derives the link to analyticity in the complex plane and its implementation in S-matrix theory via standard textbook steps. No new derivation is claimed that reduces to a fitted parameter, self-referential loop, or load-bearing self-citation; the central chain is internally consistent with prior literature and externally falsifiable through scattering data. The assumption of causality is explicitly the starting point rather than a hidden output, matching conventional treatments without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard physical principles such as causality without introducing new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond domain assumptions in quantum scattering theory.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Physical systems obey strict causality (effects cannot precede causes)
    Invoked as the starting point to connect mechanical examples to analyticity in scattering amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1127 out tokens · 27380 ms · 2026-05-18T10:46:52.615681+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H. M. Nussenzveig, Causality and dispersion relations, Vol. 95, Academic Press, New Y ork, London, 1972

    work page 1972

  2. [2]

    Omn `es, Introduction to particle physics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd

    R. Omn `es, Introduction to particle physics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. , New Y ork, London, 1971

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    H. A. Kramers, La diffusion de la lumi `ere par les atomes, in: Atti del Congresso Internazionale de i Fisici, Como, Vol. 2, Zanichelli, Bologna, 1927, p. 545

    work page 1927

  4. [4]

    R. de L. Kronig, On the theory of dispersion of X-rays, J. O pt. Soc. Am. 12 (1926) 547. doi:10.1364/JOSA.12.000547

    work page doi:10.1364/josa.12.000547 1926

  5. [5]

    R. E. Cutkosky , Singularities and discontinuities of Fe ynman amplitudes, J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 429. doi:10.1063/1.1703676

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1703676 1960

  6. [6]

    Itzykson, J

    C. Itzykson, J. B. Zuber, Quantum field theory, Internati onal Series In Pure and Applied Physics, McGraw-Hill, New Y o rk, 1980

    work page 1980

  7. [7]

    M. E. Peskin, D. V . Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory , Addison-Wesley , Reading, USA, 1995. doi:10.1201/9780429503559

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  8. [8]

    K. M. Watson, Some general relations between the photopr oduction and scattering of π mesons, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 228. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.228

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.95.228 1954

  9. [9]

    V . L. Chernyak, A. R. Zhitnitsky , Asymptotic behavior of hadron form factors in quark model. (In Russian), JETP Lett. 25 (1977) 510, [Zh. Eksp. T eor. Fiz. 25 (1977) 544]. 14 Dispersion relations: foundations

    work page 1977

  10. [10]

    G. R. Farrar, D. R. Jackson, The pion form factor, Phys. R ev. Lett. 43 (1979) 246. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.246

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.246 1979

  11. [11]

    A. V . Efremov, A. V . Radyushkin, Factorization and asym ptotical behavior of pion form factor in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 245. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90869-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90869-2 1980

  12. [12]

    G. P . Lepage, S. J. Brodsky , Exclusive processes in quan tum chromodynamics: evolution equations for hadronic wave functions and the form factors of mesons, Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 359. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90554-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90554-9 1979

  13. [13]

    G. P . Lepage, S. J. Brodsky , Exclusive processes in pert urbative quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 215 7. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2157 1980

  14. [14]

    Electromagnetic form factor of the pion

    H. Leutwyler, Electromagnetic form factor of the pion, in: Continuous advances in QCD 2002 / ARKAD YFEST (honoring t he 60th birthday of Prof. Arkady Vainshtein), 2002, p. 23. arXiv:hep-ph/0212324, doi:10.1142/9789812776310_0002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812776310_0002 2002

  15. [15]

    Implications of the recent high statistics determination of the pion electromagnetic form factor in the timelike region

    B. Ananthanarayan, I. Caprini, I. S. Imsong, Implicati ons of the recent high statistics determination of the pion e lectromagnetic form factor in the timelike region, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 096002. arXiv:1102.3299, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.096002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.096002 2011

  16. [16]

    Ruiz Arriola, P

    E. Ruiz Arriola, P . S ´anchez-Puertas, Phase of the electromagnetic form factor o f the pion, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 054003. arXiv:2403.07121, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.054003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.054003 2024

  17. [17]

    T . P . Leplumey , P . Stoffer, Dispersive analysis of the pion vector form factor without zeros (2025). arXiv:2501.09643

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Omn `es, On the solution of certain singular integral equations o f quantum field theory , Nuovo Cim

    R. Omn `es, On the solution of certain singular integral equations o f quantum field theory , Nuovo Cim. 8 (1958) 316. doi:10.1007/BF02747746

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02747746 1958

  19. [19]

    Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization

    G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, P . Stoffer, T wo-pion con tribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 0 06. arXiv:1810.00007, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)006 2019

  20. [20]

    The branching ratio $\omega \to \pi^+\pi^-$ revisited

    C. Hanhart, S. Holz, B. Kubis, A. Kup ´s´c, A. Wirzba, C.-W. Xiao, The branching ratio ω→π+π− revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 98, [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 450]. arXiv:1611.09359, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4651-x

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4651-x 2017

  21. [21]

    J. F . Donoghue, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, The decay of a li ght Higgs boson, Nucl. Phys. B 343 (1990) 341. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90474-R

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90474-r 1990

  22. [22]

    N_f Dependence of the Quark Condensate from a Chiral Sum Rule

    B. Moussallam, N f dependence of the quark condensate from a chiral sum rule, Eu r. Phys. J. C 14 (2000) 111. arXiv:hep-ph/9909292, doi:10.1007/s100520050738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100520050738 2000

  23. [23]

    Zweig rule violation in the scalar sector and values of low-energy constants

    S. Descotes-Genon, Zweig rule violation in the scalar s ector and values of low-energy constants, JHEP 03 (2001) 002 . arXiv:hep-ph/0012221, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/03/002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/03/002 2001

  24. [24]

    Dispersive analysis of the scalar form factor of the nucleon

    M. Hoferichter, C. Ditsche, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißner, Di spersive analysis of the scalar form factor of the nucleon, J HEP 06 (2012) 063. arXiv:1204.6251, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2012)063 2012

  25. [25]

    J. T . Daub, H. K. Dreiner, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, U.-G. Mei ßner, Improving the hadron physics of non-standard-model d ecays: example bounds on R-parity violation, JHEP 01 (2013) 179. arXiv:1212.4408, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2013)179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2013)179 2013

  26. [26]

    Lepton flavor violation in the Higgs sector and the role of hadronic tau-lepton decays

    A. Celis, V . Cirigliano, E. Passemar, Lepton flavor viol ation in the Higgs sector and the role of hadronic τ-lepton decays, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 013008. arXiv:1309.3564, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.013008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.013008 2014

  27. [27]

    J. T . Daub, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, A model-independent an alysis of final-state interactions in ¯B0 d/ s → J/ψππ, JHEP 02 (2016) 009. arXiv:1508.06841, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)009 2016

  28. [28]

    M. W. Winkler, Decay and detection of a light scalar boso n mixing with the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015018. arXiv:1809.01876, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.015018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.015018 2019

  29. [29]

    K^L_{mu3} decay: A Stringent Test of Right-Handed Quark Currents

    V . Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar, J. Stern, K L µ3 decay: a stringent test of right-handed quark currents, Phy s. Lett. B 638 (2006) 480. arXiv:hep-ph/0603202, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.079

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.079 2006

  30. [30]

    Dispersive representation and shape of the Kl3 form factors: robustness

    V . Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar, J. Stern, Dispersiv e representation and shape of the Kl3 form factors: robustness, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 034034. arXiv:0903.1654, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.034034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.034034 2009

  31. [31]

    Dispersive analysis of K_{L mu3} and K_{L e3} scalar and vector form factors using KTeV data

    E. Abouzaid, et al., Dispersive analysis of KLµ3 and KLe3 scalar and vector form factors using KT eV data, Phys. Rev. D 8 1 (2010) 052001. arXiv:0912.1291, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.052001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.052001 2010

  32. [32]

    A no-go theorem for non-standard explanations of the $\tau\to K_S\pi\nu_\tau$ CP asymmetry

    V . Cirigliano, A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, No-go the orem for nonstandard explanations of the τ→ KSπντCP asymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (14) (2018) 141803. arXiv:1712.06595, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.141803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.141803 2018

  33. [33]

    Hoferichter, B

    M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, J. Ruiz de Elvira, P . Stoffer, Nucleon matrix elements of the antisymmetric quark tensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 122001, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 199901 ]. arXiv:1811.11181, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.122001 2019

  34. [34]

    Couplings of light I=0 scalar mesons to simple operators in the complex plane

    B. Moussallam, Couplings of light I = 0 scalar mesons to simple operators in the complex plane, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1814. arXiv:1110.6074, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1814-z

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1814-z 2011

  35. [35]

    Radiative resonance couplings in $\gamma\pi\to\pi\pi$

    M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Zanke, Radiative resonanc e couplings in γπ→ππ, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 114016. arXiv:1710.00824, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.114016 2017

  36. [36]

    Mass and width of the lowest resonance in QCD

    I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, H. Leutwyler, Mass and width o f the lowest resonance in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 1320 01. arXiv:hep-ph/0512364, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.132001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.132001 2006

  37. [37]

    Precise determination of the f0(600) and f0(980) pole parameters from a dispersive data analysis

    R. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, R. Kami´nski, J. R. Pel ´aez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, Precise determination of the f0(600) and f0(980) pole parameters from a dispersive data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 07200 1. arXiv:1107.1635, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.072001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.072001 2011

  38. [38]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißn er, Nucleon resonance parameters from Roy–Steiner equatio ns, Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138698. arXiv:2312.15015, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138698

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138698 2024

  39. [39]

    M. Kirk, B. Kubis, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, A simple paramet risation of the pion form factor, Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025) 139 266. arXiv:2410.13764, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139266

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139266 2025

  40. [40]

    Mandelstam, Determination of the pion–nucleon scat tering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity

    S. Mandelstam, Determination of the pion–nucleon scat tering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity . General theory, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1344. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.112.1344

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1344 1958

  41. [41]

    Mandelstam, Analytic properties of transition ampl itudes in perturbation theory , Phys

    S. Mandelstam, Analytic properties of transition ampl itudes in perturbation theory , Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1741. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.1741

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.115.1741 1959

  42. [42]

    Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys

    M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev. 123 (1961) 1053. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.123.1053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.123.1053 1961

  43. [43]

    Martin, Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scatt ering amplitudes, Phys

    A. Martin, Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scatt ering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 1432. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.129.1432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.129.1432 1963

  44. [44]

    S. M. Roy , Exact integral equation for pion–pion scatte ring involving only physical region partial waves, Phys. Le tt. B 36 (1971) 353. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(71)90724-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(71)90724-6 1971

  45. [45]

    Roy equation analysis of pi pi scattering

    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyl er, Roy equation analysis of ππscattering, Phys. Rept. 353 (2001) 207. arXiv:hep-ph/0005297, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00009-6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00009-6 2001

  46. [46]

    The pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV

    R. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, R. Kami ´nski, J. R. Pel ´aez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, F . J. Yndur ´ain, The pion–pion scattering amplitude. IV: Im- proved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 074004. arXiv:1102.2183, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.074004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.074004 2011

  47. [47]

    Colangelo, A brief introduction to dispersive metho ds (2025)

    G. Colangelo, A brief introduction to dispersive metho ds (2025). arXiv:2509.24548. Dispersion relations: foundations 15

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    G. E. Hite, F . Steiner, New dispersion relations and the ir application to partial-wave amplitudes, Nuovo Cim. A 18 ( 1973) 237. doi:10.1007/BF02722827

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02722827 1973

  49. [49]

    A new analysis of $\pi K$ scattering from Roy and Steiner type equations

    P . B ¨ uttiker, S. Descotes-Genon, B. Moussallam, A new analysis of πK scattering from Roy and Steiner type equations, Eur. Phys. J . C 33 (2004) 409. arXiv:hep-ph/0310283, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2004-01591-1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s2004-01591-1 2004

  50. [50]

    J. R. Pel ´aez, A. Rodas, Dispersive πK →πK andππ→ K ¯K amplitudes from scattering data, threshold parameters, an d the lightest strange resonanceκor K∗ 0(700), Phys. Rept. 969 (2022) 1. arXiv:2010.11222, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.004 2022

  51. [51]

    Roy-Steiner equations for gamma gamma -> pi pi

    M. Hoferichter, D. R. Phillips, C. Schat, Roy–Steiner e quations for γγ→ππ, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1743. arXiv:1106.4147, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1743-x

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1743-x 2011

  52. [52]

    Hoferichter, P

    M. Hoferichter, P . Stoffer, Dispersion relations for γ∗γ∗→ππ: helicity amplitudes, subtractions, and anomalous thresh olds, JHEP 07 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    arXiv:1905.13198, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)073 1905

  54. [54]

    Roy-Steiner-equation analysis of pion-nucleon scattering

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißn er, Roy–Steiner-equation analysis of pion–nucleon scatte ring, Phys. Rept. 625 (2016) 1. arXiv:1510.06039, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.002 2016

  55. [55]

    Jacob, G

    M. Jacob, G. C. Wick, On the general theory of collisions for particles with spin, Annals Phys. 7 (1959) 404. doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6022

    work page doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6022 1959

  56. [56]

    Dispersive analysis of omega --> 3pi and phi --> 3pi decays

    F . Niecknig, B. Kubis, S. P . Schneider, Dispersive analysis ofω→ 3πandφ→ 3πdecays, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2014. arXiv:1203.2501, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2014-1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2014-1 2012

  57. [57]

    Extracting the chiral anomaly from gamma pi --> pi pi

    M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, D. Sakkas, Extracting the chi ral anomaly from γπ→ππ, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 116009. arXiv:1210.6793, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.116009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.116009 2012

  58. [58]

    What $\pi-\pi$ Scattering Tells Us About Chiral Perturbation Theory

    J. Stern, H. Sazdjian, N. H. Fuchs, What ππscattering tells us about chiral perturbation theory , Phys . Rev. D 47 (1993) 3814. arXiv:hep-ph/9301244, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3814

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.3814 1993

  59. [59]

    The Low Energy $\pi\,\pi$ Amplitude to One and Two Loops

    M. Knecht, B. Moussallam, J. Stern, N. H. Fuchs, The low- energy ππamplitude to one and two loops, Nucl. Phys. B 457 (1995) 513. arXiv:hep-ph/9507319, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00515-3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00515-3 1995

  60. [60]

    Dispersive Approach to Chiral Perturbation Theory

    M. Zdr ´ahal, J. Novotn´ y, Dispersive approach to chiral perturbat ion theory , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 116016. arXiv:0806.4529, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.116016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.116016 2008

  61. [61]

    N. N. Khuri, S. B. T reiman, Pion–pion scattering and K±→ 3πdecay, Phys. Rev. 119 (1960) 1115. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.119.1115

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.119.1115 1960

  62. [62]

    Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the D^+ --> K^- pi^+ pi^+ Dalitz plot

    F . Niecknig, B. Kubis, Dispersion-theoretical analys is of the D+ → K−π+π+ Dalitz plot, JHEP 10 (2015) 142. arXiv:1509.03188, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)142 2015

  63. [63]

    J. B. Bronzan, C. Kacser, Khuri–T reiman representatio n and perturbation theory , Phys. Rev. 132 (1963) 2703. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.132.2703

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.132.2703 1963

  64. [64]

    Solving integral equations in $\eta\to 3\pi$

    J. Gasser, A. Rusetsky , Solving integral equations in η→ 3π, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 906. arXiv:1809.06399, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6378-8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6378-8 2018

  65. [65]

    Bernard, S

    V . Bernard, S. Descotes-Genon, M. Knecht, B. Moussalla m, A dispersive study of final-state interactions in K →πππamplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 744. arXiv:2403.17570, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13084-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13084-y 2024

  66. [66]

    Kambor, C

    J. Kambor, C. Wiesendanger, D. Wyler, Final-state inte ractions and Khuri–T reiman equations in η→ 3πdecays, Nucl. Phys. B 465 (1996)

    work page 1996

  67. [67]

    arXiv:hep-ph/9509374, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00676-1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00676-1

  68. [68]

    A. V . Anisovich, H. Leutwyler, Dispersive analysis of t he decay η→ 3π, Phys. Lett. B 375 (1996) 335. arXiv:hep-ph/9601237, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00192-X

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00192-x 1996

  69. [69]

    Dispersive analysis of $\mathbf\eta \rightarrow 3 \pi$

    G. Colangelo, S. Lanz, H. Leutwyler, E. Passemar, Dispe rsive analysis of η→ 3π, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 947. arXiv:1807.11937, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6377-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6377-9 2018

  70. [70]

    Akdag, T

    H. Akdag, T . Isken, B. Kubis, Patterns of C- and CP-viola tion in hadronic ηandη′three-body decays, JHEP 02 (2022) 137, [Erratum: JHEP 12 (2022) 156]. arXiv:2111.02417, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)137

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)137 2022

  71. [71]

    Albaladejo, D

    M. Albaladejo, D. Winney , I. V . Danilkin, C. Fern ´andez-Ram´ ırez, V . Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, A. Pilloni, J. A . Silva-Castro, A. P . Szczepaniak, Khuri–T reiman equations for 3πdecays of particles with spin, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054018 . arXiv:1910.03107, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.054018 2020

  72. [72]

    Niehus, M

    M. Niehus, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, The γπ→ππanomaly from lattice QCD and dispersion relations, JHEP 12 ( 2021) 038. arXiv:2110.11372, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)038

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)038 2021

  73. [73]

    Stamen, T

    D. Stamen, T . Isken, B. Kubis, M. Mikhasenko, M. Niehus, Analysis of rescattering effects in 3πfinal states, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 510, [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 586]. arXiv:2212.11767, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11665-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11665-x 2023

  74. [74]

    Albaladejo, et al., Khuri–T reiman analysis of J/ψ →π+π−π0, Phys

    M. Albaladejo, et al., Khuri–T reiman analysis of J/ψ →π+π−π0, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014035. arXiv:2304.09736, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.014035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.014035 2023

  75. [75]

    Hoferichter, B.-L

    M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, Extracting the ch iral anomaly from e+e−→ 3π, JHEP 07 (2025) 095. arXiv:2504.13827, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)095

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)095 2025

  76. [76]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, S. Mizera, What is the iǫfor the S -matrix?, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer, 2023. arXiv:2204.02988, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18258-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18258-7 2023

  77. [77]

    Mizera, Physics of the analytic S -matrix, Phys

    S. Mizera, Physics of the analytic S -matrix, Phys. Rept. 1047 (2024) 1. arXiv:2306.05395, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.006 2024

  78. [78]

    R. J. Eden, P . V . Landshoff, D. I. Olive, J. C. Polkinghor ne, The analytic S -matrix, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1966

    work page 1966

  79. [79]

    J. A. Oller, A brief introduction to dispersion relatio ns, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13582-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13582-9 2019