Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Derivation of the fourth-order DLSS equation with nonlinear mobility via chemical reactions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a discrete chemical reaction network, in the vanishing-mesh limit, converges to the fourth-order DLSS equation with nonlinear mobility ∂tρ = −∂xx(ρ^α ∂xx log ρ) for every α>0.

desk verdict Serious EDP-convergence paper that deserves refereeing, but the abstract overclaims: the limit is an EDI solution, and the upgrade to the DLSS PDE is conditional for most α. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.07149 v2 pith:3DGOPVLN submitted 2025-10-08 math.AP cs.NAmath-phmath.MPmath.NA

Alexander Mielke , André Schlichting , Artur Stephan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APcs.NAmath-phmath.MPmath.NA MSC 35A1535K5535A3547J3565M08
keywords DLSSequationnonlinearmobilitychemicalreactionnetworkEDPconvergencegradientflowdiscrete-to-continuumlimitenergy-dissipationbalancetravelingwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a simple chemical reaction network—pairs of particles at a site jumping apart and the reverse jump together—produces a full family of fourth-order diffusion equations in the macroscopic limit. Depending on the rate coefficients, the continuum limit is either the classical Derrida–Lebowitz–Speer–Spohn (DLSS) equation or its generalization with power-type nonlinear mobility ∂tρ = −∂xx(ρ^α ∂xx log ρ), for any α>0. The limit carries a thermodynamic gradient structure driven by the Boltzmann entropy, and solutions satisfy an energy-dissipation balance (or at least an inequality) that encodes the physics. For α>1 the equation develops compactly supported fronts, for α<1 algebraic tails, mirroring porous medium and fast diffusion behavior. A careful reader cares because this is a microscopic, first-principles derivation of a whole family of degenerate fourth-order PDEs, not just the classical α=1 case.

What carries the argument

The central object is the energy-dissipation functional Lα,N built from the discrete entropy E_N, the primal dissipation R_{α,N} with perspective function C(s|w)=w·2 arsinh(s/(2w)) and mobility mα, and the relaxed slope Sα,N. The continuous counterpart is the quadratic dual dissipation R*_α(ρ,η)=½∫ρ^α η² dx and the relaxed slope Sα(ρ)=½∫ρ^α (Δ log ρ)² dx, which admits four equivalent expressions (3.4), the most useful being Sα(ρ)= (2/α²)∫(Δρ^{α/2}−4|∇ρ^{α/4}|²)² dx. The argument runs on a chain rule for the entropy: along any curve with finite dissipation, E(ρ(s))−E(ρ(r)) = −∫∫ Σ V dxdt, where V=ρ^{−α/2}j and Σ=−(2/α)(Δρ^{α/2}−4|∇ρ^{α/4}|²). The chain rule upgrades EDI solutions to EDB solut

What would settle it

For α>2, construct a sequence of discrete EDB solutions whose continuum limit has a zero of order γ with 3/α<γ<3/2 (e.g. near a point, ρ(x)≈|x|^γ); the computation in Step 5 of Proposition 4.2 indicates the regularized slope stays unbounded, so such a limit would satisfy the energy-dissipation inequality but fail the balance—refuting the unconditional weak-solution claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the rate equations (1.3) for the binary reaction network (1.2), with a rate activity σα satisfying Assumption 2.1, are the discrete microscopic model whose large-scale limit is the fourth-order equation ∂tρ = −∂xx(ρ^α ∂xx log ρ) on the torus. The proof runs through EDP convergence: the discrete equations are exact energy-dissipation-balance (EDB) solutions of a gradient system with entropy E_N and a cosh-type dissipation; passing N→∞ yields, up to subsequence, curves satisfying the energy-dissipation inequality for the continuous entropy E(ρ)=∫(ρ log ρ − ρ + 1)dx. With an additional regularity assumption—boundedness of ρ, and for α>2 also a positive lower bound—the

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the continuum limit as a true weak solution (rather than merely a variational EDI object) rests on a chain rule that requires the limit density to be bounded, and for α>2 additionally strictly positive; the paper constructs limits without proving these bounds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every α>0 there exists a microscopic reaction network whose large-scale limit is the DLSS-type equation with mobility exponent α; the classical α=1 DLSS equation is recovered as a special case.
  • The limiting equation carries a gradient structure driven by the Boltzmann entropy, giving solutions a variational characterization (EDB/EDI) that serves as a notion of weak solution for this degenerate fourth-order PDE.
  • Under the regularity conditions (1.12), the constructed limits satisfy the full energy-dissipation balance and are weak solutions with flux j ∈ L^{pα} for pα = max{(4+α)/(2+α), 4/3}.
  • For α>1 the equation admits compactly supported traveling waves; for α<1 it admits traveling waves with algebraic tails—quantitative behavior reminiscent of porous medium and fast diffusion equations.
  • The discrete scheme preserves positivity and the entropy as a Lyapunov function, so microscopic solutions are global and positive, and the macroscopic limit inherits these qualitative features in the variational sense.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derivation is one-dimensional; the same reaction-network structure in higher dimensions would face the issue that the flux space is no longer one-dimensional, so the EDP machinery would need a genuinely vectorial analogue—an extension the paper does not address.
  • The traveling-wave and source-type numerics suggest that for α>1 the PDE has finite speed of propagation; a direct comparison or entropy-dissipation argument could make this rigorous, but that is not proved here.
  • The chain-rule gap for α>2 without positivity indicates that the true solution set of (1.1) may contain EDI-only solutions that are not weak solutions; testing the discrete scheme on initial data with cusp-like zeros would reveal whether this gap is actually populated.
  • The variational EDP formulation may be transferable to other reaction networks where the entropy is the driving functional, potentially yielding new fourth-order continuum models from microscopic binary interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper derives a generalized fourth-order DLSS equation ∂tρ = −∂xx(ρ^α ∂xx log ρ) on the torus as the macroscopic limit of a chemical reaction network on a discrete circle with binary reactions X_{k−1}+X_{k+1} ⇌ 2X_k. The discrete rate equations are cast as gradient systems in continuity-equation form with an entropy driving functional. The authors prove well-posedness of the discrete system (Proposition 2.5), its variational characterization as an energy-dissipation balance (Proposition 2.6), and an EDP-convergence theorem (Theorem 3.6) that produces, under well-prepared initial data, a limit curve satisfying the energy-dissipation inequality (EDI). Under additional regularity assumptions (1.12), Proposition 4.2 provides a chain rule and Result C upgrades the EDI solution to an EDB solution and a weak solution of the PDE. The introduction also contains formal traveling-wave and numerical explorations. The central claim advertised in the abstract, however, is that the limit is the DLSS-type equation unconditionally for all α>0; the actual theorem establishes only an EDI solution, with the upgrade to a weak solution conditional on unproved regularity.

Significance. If fully established, the paper would give a genuine microscopic derivation of a whole family of fourth-order PDEs with nonlinear mobility, together with a thermodynamic gradient structure via EDP convergence. The analytic framework is carefully developed: the discrete well-posedness, the compactness argument (Lemmas 3.7–3.11, Proposition 3.12), and the liminf estimates (Propositions 3.14–3.15) are substantial and largely self-contained. The traveling-wave analysis and numerical simulations are useful illustrations. However, the main advertised result is stronger than what is proved: the passage from EDI to EDB/weak solution depends on the chain rule in Proposition 4.2, which requires L∞ bounds for α∈(0,2] and both L∞ and a positive lower bound for α>2. These bounds are not obtained from the EDP compactness, and the authors explicitly leave the α>2 case open. This is a load-bearing gap that prevents the unconditional interpretation of the derivation. The paper also relies on the unpublished preprint [HMS25] for crucial inequalities (2.8)–(2.9) and parts of the compactness argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 3.6 / Result C] The abstract states that 'in the vanishing-mesh-size limit we obtain either the classical DLSS equation or a variant with nonlinear mobility', and the introduction repeats the unconditional claim. However, Theorem 3.6 constructs only an EDI solution, i.e., a curve (ρ,j)∈CE with Lα(ρ,j)≤0. Definition 3.4 requires no constitutive relation between j and ρ. The identification j=−ρ^α∂xx log ρ is obtained only in Result C, which is conditional on conditions (1.12) and the chain rule of Proposition 4.2. For α>2 the authors themselves state in §4, Step 5: 'It remains open to show the chain rule (under L∞ bounds) for α>2 when no positivity bound is assumed.' Thus for α>2 the limit is not shown to be a weak solution of (1.1). The abstract and the statement of Result B should be revised to reflect the conditional nature of the derivation, or the missing regularity must be proved.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.2 and EDP compactness] The upgrade from EDI to EDB/weak solution is load-bearing, but the required bounds are not supplied by the compactness theory. Lemma 3.9 gives only ρ∈L^{α+1}([0,T]×T), and Proposition 3.12 gives strong convergence in L1 from the Dα≤C bound plus entropy bound. Nothing in this machinery yields the global L∞ bound (1.12b) or the positive lower bound (1.12c). Even for α∈(0,2], where the chain rule works under L∞, the constructed limit is not shown to satisfy that bound. Hence the result as stated does not deliver a weak solution for any α≠1 without an additional unproved a priori estimate. A concrete test would be to either exhibit a family of discrete solutions with uniformly bounded Dα,N but no uniform L∞ bound, or to prove such a bound. Without this, the phrase 'derivation of the DLSS equation' in the abstract overstates what Theorem 3.6 and Result C establish.
  3. [Assumption 2.1 and equations (2.8)–(2.9)] The central compactness and liminf arguments rely on the estimates (2.8) and (2.9), for which the proof is deferred to the unpublished preprint [HMS25]. The same preprint is invoked for parts of the flux compactness (Lemma 3.10) and for the Gagliardo–Nirenberg estimate used in the proof of Result C. Since these inequalities are not proved in the manuscript, the self-containedness of the derivation is weakened. For a journal submission, the authors should either provide full proofs of (2.8)–(2.9) in an appendix or state more prominently that the convergence proof depends on an external preprint. This is not a correctness issue if the preprint is sound, but it affects the verifiability of the main claims.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Result A] Typo: 'acitivity' should be 'activity'.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption says 'α∈{−1,...,5}', but the paper restricts α>0 in the model (1.1). Negative α appears to be a plotting artifact; please clarify or restrict the displayed range.
  3. [Section 2.2, proof of Lemma 2.4] The sentence 'The proof is analogously to [HMS25]' is ungrammatical; should be 'analogous to'.
  4. [Equation (2.7)] The perspective function C(s|w) is introduced without motivation. A short explanation of its role in the Legendre duality would improve readability.
  5. [References] Several references have incomplete bibliographic data, e.g., [GeH25] has '??' for volume/pages and year. Please update before final submission.
  6. [Section 1, traveling waves] The traveling-front ansatz is given only for α>1. For α<1 the paper refers to algebraic tails but does not provide the analogous calculation; a brief formula or reference would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity; the limit equation is not assumed in the discrete variational proof, though the paper relies on an unpublished overlapping-authors preprint for auxiliary estimates and its abstract outruns the proved EDB result.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the discrete input is the reaction network (1.2)–(1.3), and the continuum DLSS family is not inserted as an assumption into the compactness or liminf arguments. The target flux appears only through the formal expansion (1.6) and through the allowed homogeneity/bounds on the activity σα in Assumption 2.1; this is a consistency condition on the class of rates, not a fitting of the PDE from data. Theorem 3.6 obtains EDI solutions from the discrete EDB solutions via uniform bounds, Aubin–Lions compactness, and liminf estimates for entropy, primal dissipation, and slope. The passage from EDI to the actual PDE in Result C is via the chain rule Proposition 4.2 and the identity V=Σ, which are proved rather than assumed. The paper is explicit that the convergence result gives only an EDI solution a priori, and Proposition 4.2 is conditional on (1.12); the text also states: 'It remains open to show the chain rule (under L∞ bounds) for α>2 when no positivity bound is assumed.' This is a regularity/correctness gap between the abstract's unconditional wording and the theorem, not a circular step. The main non-circularity caveat is the reliance on the authors' unpublished preprint [HMS25] for the crucial estimates (2.8)–(2.9), for flux compactness arguments, and for a Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality. That makes the proof not fully self-contained and is a legitimate dependency concern, but those cited inequalities are auxiliary analytic facts and do not assert the target PDE, so the central derivation does not reduce to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on a postulated reaction network, an activity function satisfying technical bounds (Assumption 2.1), and functional inequalities inherited from the authors' earlier work [HMS25]. No new physical constants or external entities with independent evidence are introduced. The only adjustable numbers are α (a model parameter spanning the PDE family) and the arbitrary amplitude κ in the illustrative traveling wave.

free parameters (2)
  • mobility exponent α = not fitted; model parameter
    Exponent in the target PDE (1.1) and in the rate equation (1.3) via the (α−2)-homogeneous activity σα. No data-fitting; the whole family α>0 is derived.
  • traveling wave amplitude κ = arbitrary; not fitted
    Scaling parameter for the explicit traveling front solution in Section 1 (ρ=κ(ct−x)^{3/(α−1)}); it is a free scaling of the side illustration, not of the central derivation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Chemical reaction network (1.2) with rate equation (1.3) as the microscopic model
    The starting point of the derivation; a modeling postulate chosen so that the formal limit is the DLSS-type equation.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1 on the activity σα (continuity, Stolarsky-mean bounds)
    Gives well-posedness, positivity, and the compactness/liminf estimates. The paper shows such σα exist for all α>0 (Lemma 2.4), but the bounds are assumed for the derivation.
  • domain assumption Inequalities (2.8)–(2.9) for the cosh-type dissipation function C and its perspective
    Quoted from the same-group preprint [HMS25] and not proven here; used for flux uniform integrability and monotonicity in Lemma 3.10.
  • standard math Aubin–Lions compactness theorem (Rossi–Savaré [RoS03])
    Used in Proposition 3.12 to obtain strong compactness of the embedded densities.
  • standard math Gagliardo–Nirenberg interpolation estimate (from [HMS25, Appendix C])
    Used to derive improved L^{α+1} integrability in Lemma 3.9.
invented entities (1)
  • chemical species X_k (lattice sites)
    purpose: Bookkeeping for the concentrations in the reaction network (1.2); not physical molecules
    The X_k are a modeling device for the discretized circle; they carry no falsifiable prediction outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Derivation of the fourth-order DLSS equation with nonlinear mobility via chemical reactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3DGOPVLN

@misc{pith2026251007149,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Derivation of the fourth-order DLSS equation with nonlinear mobility via chemical reactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3DGOPVLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.07149}
}
read the original abstract

We provide a derivation of the one-dimensional fourth-order DLSS equation based on an interpretation as a chemical reaction network. We consider the rate equation on the discretized circle for a process in which pairs of particles occupying the same site simultaneously jump to the two neighboring sites; the reverse process involves pairs of particles at adjacent sites simultaneously jumping back to the site located between them. Depending on the rates, in the vanishing-mesh-size limit we obtain either the classical DLSS equation or a variant with nonlinear mobility of power type. Via EDP convergence, we identify the limiting gradient structure to be driven by entropy with respect to a generalization of diffusive transport with nonlinear mobility. Interestingly, the DLSS equation with power-type mobility shares qualitative similarities with the fast diffusion and porous medium equation, since we find traveling wave solutions with algebraic tails or compactly supported polynomials, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.07149 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numerically obtained similarity profiles Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Numerically obtained solutions to (1.3) for α ∈ {2, 4, 7} (from left to right). Starting from a discrete bump function c 0 k = max 0, 1 − ((N/2 − k)/(ℓ N))2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From diffusion to transmission via EDP-convergence: a paradigmatic multiscale limit

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    EDP-convergence of Otto-type gradient structures for nonlinear diffusion yields a unique effective membrane kinetic relation that can be exponential even when the microscopic dissipation is quadratic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.nonempty.mrnumber duplicate missing pop "" 'skip if duplicate empty 'pop " " swap * " " * write if FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline INTEGERS nameptr namesleft numnames FUNCTION format.language language empty "" " (" language * ")" * if FUNCTION format.names 's := #1 'nameptr := s nu...

  2. [2]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar \'e , Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures , Birkhäuser Basel, Basel , 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah: Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM R eview 59:1 (2017) 65--98

    2017

  4. [4]

    P. M. Bleher, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer: Existence and positivity of solutions of a fourth-order nonlinear PDE describing interface fluctuations . Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 47:7 (1994) 923--942

    1994

  5. [5]

    Br \'e zis, Op \'e rateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contractions dans les espaces de H ilbert , North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1973

    H. Br \'e zis, Op \'e rateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contractions dans les espaces de H ilbert , North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1973

    1973

  6. [6]

    Dondl, T

    P. Dondl, T. Frenzel, and A. Mielke: A gradient system with a wiggly energy and relaxed EDP -convergence . Calc. Var. PDE 25:68 (2019) 68/1--45

    2019

  7. [7]

    De Giorgi, A

    E. De Giorgi, A. Marino, and M. Tosques: Problems of evolution in metric spaces and curves of maximal slope. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. (8) 68:3 (1980) 180--187

    1980

  8. [8]

    Disser and M

    K. Disser and M. Liero: On gradient structures for markov chains and the passage to wasserstein gradient flows. Netw. Heterog. Media 10:2 (2015) 233--253

    2015

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Derrida, J

    B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, E. R. Speer, and H. Spohn: Dynamics of an anchored T oom interface . J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24:20 (1991) 4805

    1991

  2. [10]

    Derrida, J

    B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, E. R. Speer, and H. Spohn: Fluctuations of a stationary nonequilibrium interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 165--168

    1991

  3. [11]

    Degond, F

    P. Degond, F. M \'e hats, and C. Ringhofer: Quantum energy-transport and drift-diffusion models. J. Stat. Phys. 118 (2005) 625--667

    2005

  4. [12]

    Esposito, G

    A. Esposito, G. Heinze, and A. Schlichting: Graph-to-local limit for the nonlocal interaction equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. 194 (2025) 103663

    2025

  5. [13]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess: Non-equilibrium large deviations and parabolic-hyperbolic PDE with irregular drift . Invent. Math. 234:2 (2023) 573--636

    2023

  6. [14]

    Frenzel and M

    T. Frenzel and M. Liero: Effective diffusion in thin structures via generalized gradient systems and EDP -convergence . Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S 14:1 (2021) 395--425

    2021

  7. [15]

    Gess and D

    B. Gess and D. Heydecker: The porous medium equation: large deviations and gradient flow with degenerate and unbounded diffusion. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. ??:?? (2025) ??

    2025

  8. [16]

    Giacomelli and F

    L. Giacomelli and F. Otto: Variatonal formulation for the lubrication approximation of the hele-shaw flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 13:3 (2001) 377–403

    2001

  9. [17]

    Gianazza, G

    U. Gianazza, G. Savar \'e , and G. Toscani: The W asserstein gradient flow of the F isher information and the quantum drift-diffusion equation . Arch. Ration. Mech. An. 194:1 (2009) 133--220

    2009

  10. [18]

    Hoeksema, C

    J. Hoeksema, C. Y. Lam, and A. Schlichting: Variational convergence for an irreversible exchange-driven stochastic particle system. Preprint arXiv:2401.06696 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Heinze, A

    G. Heinze, A. Mielke, and A. Stephan: Discrete-to-continuum limit for nonlinear reaction-diffusion systems via EDP convergence for gradient systems . arXiv \!:2504.06837 (2025) 1--44

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Heinze, J.-F

    G. Heinze, J.-F. Pietschmann, and A. Schlichting: Gradient flows on metric graphs with reservoirs: Microscopic derivation and multiscale limits. Preprint arXiv:2412.16775 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hraivoronska, A

    A. Hraivoronska, A. Schlichting, and O. Tse: Variational convergence of the S charfetter-- G ummel scheme to the aggregation-diffusion equation and vanishing diffusion limit . Num. Math. 156:6 (2024) 2221–2292

    2024

  14. [22]

    Liero, A

    M. Liero, A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. Michiel Renger: On microscopic origins of generalized gradient structures. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 10:1 (2017) 1--35

    2017

  15. [23]

    Maas and A

    J. Maas and A. Mielke: Modeling of chemical reaction systems with detailed balance using gradient structures. J. Stat. Physics 181 (2020) 2257--2303

    2020

  16. [24]

    Mielke, On Evolutionary -Convergence for Gradient Systems , Macroscopic and Large Scale Phenomena: Coarse Graining, Mean Field Limits and Ergodicity (A

    A. Mielke, On Evolutionary -Convergence for Gradient Systems , Macroscopic and Large Scale Phenomena: Coarse Graining, Mean Field Limits and Ergodicity (A. Muntean, J. Rademacher, and A. Zagaris, eds.), vol. 3, Springer International Publishing , Cham , 2016, pp. 187--249

    2016

  17. [25]

    , An introduction to the analysis of gradient systems, WIAS Preprint 3022, arXiv:2306.05026, 2023, (Script of a lecture course 2022/23, 100\,pp.)

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    : Non-equilibrium steady states as saddle points and EDP -convergence for slow-fast gradient systems . J. Math. Physics 64:123502 (2023) 1--27

    2023

  19. [27]

    Mielke, A

    A. Mielke, A. Montefusco, and M. A. Peletier: Exploring families of energy-dissipation landscapes via tilting --- three types of EDP convergence . Contin. Mech. Thermodyn 33 (2021) 611--637

    2021

  20. [28]

    Matthes, R

    D. Matthes, R. J. McCann, and G. Savaré: A family of nonlinear fourth order equations of gradient flow type. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 34:11 (2009) 1352–1397

    2009

  21. [29]

    Mielke, R

    A. Mielke, R. I. A. Patterson, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. M. Renger: Non-equilibrium thermodynamical principles for chemical reactions with mass-action kinetics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 77:4 (2017) 1562--1585

    2017

  22. [30]

    Mielke, M

    A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and D. M. Renger: On the relation between gradient flows and the large-deviation principle, with applications to markov chains and diffusion. Potential Anal. 41 (2014) 1293--1327

    2014

  23. [31]

    Mielke, M

    A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and A. Stephan: EDP -convergence for nonlinear fast–slow reaction systems with detailed balance . Nonlinearity 34:8 (2021) 5762--5798

    2021

  24. [32]

    Matthes, E.-M

    D. Matthes, E.-M. Rott, G. Savaré, and A. Schlichting: A structure preserving discretization for the Derrida-Lebowitz-Speer-Spohn equation based on diffusive transport . Numer. Math. 157:4 (2025) 1347--1395

    2025

  25. [33]

    Matthes, E.-M

    D. Matthes, E.-M. Rott, and A. Schlichting: Diffusive transport on the real line: semi-contractive gradient flows and their discretization. Preprint arXiv: 2501.14527 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Otto: Lubrication approximation with prescribed nonzero contact anggle

    F. Otto: Lubrication approximation with prescribed nonzero contact anggle. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 23:11–12 (1998) 2077–2164

    1998

  27. [35]

    M. A. Peletier and A. Schlichting: Cosh gradient systems and tilting. Nonlinear Anal. 238:113094 (2023) 1--113

    2023

  28. [36]

    M. A. Peletier, R. Rossi, G. Savar \'e , and O. Tse: Jump processes as generalized gradient flows. Calc. Var. Partial Dif. 61:1 (2022) 1--85

    2022

  29. [37]

    Rossi, A

    R. Rossi, A. Mielke, and G. Savar\' e : A metric approach to a class of doubly nonlinear evolution equations and applications. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) VII:1 (2008) 97--169

    2008

  30. [38]

    Rossi and G

    R. Rossi and G. Savar\' e : Tightness, integral equicontinuity and compactness for evolution problems in B anach spaces . Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 2:2 (2003) 395--431

    2003

  31. [39]

    Sandier and S

    E. Sandier and S. Serfaty: Gamma‐convergence of gradient flows with applications to G inzburg‐ L andau . Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57:12 (2004) 1627--1672

    2004

  32. [40]

    Serfaty: Gamma-convergence of gradient flows on H ilbert and metric spaces and applications

    S. Serfaty: Gamma-convergence of gradient flows on H ilbert and metric spaces and applications . Discrete Cont. Dyn-a. 31:4 (2011) 1427--1451

    2011

  33. [41]

    Stephan: EDP -convergence for a linear reaction-diffusion system with fast reversible reaction

    A. Stephan: EDP -convergence for a linear reaction-diffusion system with fast reversible reaction . Calc. Var. Partial Dif. 60:6 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    K. B. Stolarsky: Generalizations of the logarithmic mean. Math. Mag. 48:2 (1975) 87–92

    1975

  35. [43]

    N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , Elsevier, 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.